The Plot

Against Christianity

by Elizabeth Dilling

Published by

"The Elizabeth Dilling Foundation", Lincoln, Nebraska

Third printing 1964 Copyright 1984

ELIZABETH DILLING

WHO IS ELIZABETH DILLING?

Box 659, Chicago 90

We were appalled, not only at the forced labor, the squalid crowded living quarters, the breadline ration-card workers' stores, the mothers pushing wheelbarrows and the begging children of the State nurseries besieging us.

The open virulent anti-Christ campaign, everywhere, was a shock. In public places were the tirades by loud speaker, in Russian (our friends translated). Atheist cartoons representing Christ as a villain, a drunk, the object of a cannibalistic orgy (Holy Communion); as an oppressor of labor; again as trash being dumped from a wheelbarrow by the Soviet "Five-Year-Plan"—these lurid cartoons filled the big bulletin boards in the churches our Soviet guides took us to visit.

In the Museum of the Revolution we were shown a huge world map. As our Guide turned a switch lights came on indicating the places all over the world where Communist Party headquarters were then functioning. Proudly our Guide announced: "Our world revolution will start with China and end with the UNITED STATES".

Russia Changes My Life

We were taken to the beautiful Church of the Redeemer in Moscow which was then, we were told, about to be dynamited to make way for a "Palace of Soviets". There was a display of full-sized mannikins dressed in the robes of the Church carrying on the Good Friday Footwashing ceremony. Our Guide rasped: "This was to show that if the Archbishop could wash the feet of the humble priest the poor should endure their sufferings without complaint! Religion was always for the suppression of the people, to keep them working from dawn to late at night under the lash!"

I thought of our Savior washing the feet of His Disciples as an example, and telling them that he who would be great among you should be the servant of all (John 13:13-15; Matt. 23:11). I glanced up at the

exquisite stained glass window of Christ, about to be demolished, and a little tear trickled down my cheek as I thought: "I can never hate You like that!" (I did not know then that the Pharisce Talmud gives Him FIVE sadistic deaths today).

Staying at my hotel was the representative of a foreign country. He told me of the police terror; how the last manager of that hotel had been whisked off in the middle of the night by the "Black Mariah"—like millions of others never to be seen again. Some of our party had been taken to the police station; they had laughed in a movie theatre. They were released when they explained that they had laughed at a private joke not at the picture (which was Soviet-made). After this and more, I returned to the "NICE" North Shore of Chicago where the "intelligentsia" were rendering brainwashed reverence to the "great Soviet Experiment".

Lecturing

Behind the backs of the careless Guides I had taker movies of the rickety trains, etc., in Russia. By chance started showing these movies to patriotic audiences my husband running the projector as I told the story Articles written for a little local newspaper were reprinted by the DAR and larger and larger groups called for my talks: District meetings of the Legion; the Military Intelligence; churches from coast to coast. It was recommended for all Chambers of Commerce, and spoke for the Minneapolis, Cleveland, Los Angeles etc., groups. I broadcast over the Moody Bible Institute radio and its head became my closest friend to her death. Dr. Ironside introduced me as the only woman he had ever asked to occupy his pulpit in the Moody Church. I spoke in the great church of Dr. W. B. Riley, organizer of the World Fundamentalist Assn., my defender to his death. I frequently spoke in Detroit churches and on numerous occasions was entertained at the executives' table at the Ford plant. Henry Ford (who never changed his mind about the role of Jewry) had me write (1939) a report on the U. of Michigan (80 pages). He contributed that year \$5,000 to the cost of my office labor which cost \$12,000 that year. The head of the National Sojourners had me airmail my two books to Sen. Royal Copeland to give to Vice-Pres. Garner who, I was told, stayed up all night reading them and had his friend Cong. Dies of Texas start

up the Dies Committee on Un-American Activities (later called the House Com.) as a result.

The hub of world Jewish anti-Christ power, the financial and industrial power best described in Rev. 18:11-, is the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE with its B'nai B'rith brotherhood, and its "secret police", s mear and ruin arm, the Anti-Defamation League. After having pushed a reluctant USA into World War II—to sprend Communism across the earth, and with its first world base, Soviet Russia, as our "ally", it was decided to crush all ANTI-COMMUNISTS by trying them as "Fascists, Nazis". A series of indictments against some 30 anti-Communists, of which I was one, was engineered by the American Jewish Committee, in 1942, 1943, 1944. The 1942 indictment never came to trial. The 1943 indictment was dismissed in Washington by Judge Adkins. Only the 1944 indictment went to trial under a stooge Judge Eicher. An unbelievable farce was staged without any legality or fact. After the death of Judge Eicher, the case was dismissed by Judge Bolitha Laws with the scathing denunciation that it had been a crime to hold those people on trial all that time without a single piece of evidence in accordance with the charge being introduced by the prosecution against ANY defendant. The Communist press had been gloating that the "sedition trial" was part of the "Moscow Purge trials" then in session all over Europe. I reproduced the item on one of my Bulletins, sent to every Congressman.

Background of E. D.

Travel in more than 60 countries convinced me that

the USA had the greatest system of government, and was the most fortunate nation on earth. I did not want it Sovietized, collectivized. Careful research and documentation have resulted in the fact that nothing I have ever printed has, to date, been refuted by friend or foe

BORN in CHICAGO, daughter of Dr. L. Kirkpatrick, physician and surgeon, of Virginian. Scotch-Irish, Presbyterian ancestry. My mother, Elizabeth Harding, descended from a long line of Anglican bishops thru her father. Her mother, Jane Musquet, was of English-French descent with a Catholic priest uncle in Paris. I married Albert Dilling, of Norwegian Lutheran ancestry. Mother of two children, married and active in Episcopal Church, of which I am a communicant. Graduate of the Starrett School for Girls, Chicago Normal School; Univ. of Chicago student, before and after marriage; pupil of world's greatest harpist. Alberto Salvi; was concert harpist and pres. of Chicago Harpists' Society. The RUSSIAN trip ended a musical career and a "nice" suburbanite existence.

WRITINGS

The famous RED NETWORK—A Who's Who and Handbook of Radicalism for Patriots, of which some 100 000 copies have circled the globe, unrefuted factually by friend or foe. The ROOSEVELT RED RECORD AND ITS BACKGROUND—a second Red Network. of over 400 pages with two indexes. THE OCTOPUS—on the ramifications of Jewish power. A Bimonthly BULLETIN SERVICE, etc., etc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

We all know how terrifically Jesus Christ denounced the Pharisees. He said they nullified all the Commandments of God by their Tradition, "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" (Mark 7:13; Matt. 15:6-9, etc). His invective, in truth, cannot be equalled. All of Matthew 23 is like a whiplash. He likened Pharisaism to a whited sepulchre, indeed beautiful outwardly, but "inside full of dead men's bones and of all uncleanness". He climaxed one condemnation after another with the expletive, "Hypocrites!" He called the Pharisees children of them that killed the Prophets. He foretold they would go on killing, crucifying and persecuting until the guilt for all the righteous blood shed from Abel on down would be upon them. "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?", He asked.

Christ is as utterly devastating of Pharisaism in the record of John 8. Altho He admitted that His hearers were descendants of Abraham, He said they were, spiritually, of the devil. He told them: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because the truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it" (John 8:44).

The Missing Link

"But", says the disinterested Christian," "what has that to do with us today? What a little bunch of Pharisees did two thousand years ago is over and done with!"

The missing link in Christian understanding is best expressed, on the subject of "Pharisees," by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943):

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The TALMUD is the largest and most important single piece of that literature. . .and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism."

Concerning the Pharisees, the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia says: "with the destruction of the Temple (70AD) the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was

reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition (Abot 1:1). Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future." (See Exhibit 264 herein).

The Scripture believers, it might be added, had accepted Christ as Him foretold and no longer called themselves "Jews" but "Christians", and were hounded and persecuted by the Pharisees as such.

The Babylonian Talmud, Sole Authority

You may ascertain by turning to top Jewish authorities today that the Babylonian Talmud, the written form of the Tradition of the Pharisees, is the sole authority of the so-called "Jewish" religion.

Rabbi Louis Finklestein was chosen in 1937 by the Kehillas (Jewish communities) of the whole world as one of the top 120 Jews who best represent a "lamp of Judaism" to the world. He has long headed the Jewish Theological Seminary of America with branches in New York and Los Angeles. In "The PHARISEES", his two-volume work, Rabbi Finklestein writes:

In Rabbi Finklestein's history of the Jews, he states: "The TALMUD derives its authority from the position held by the ancient academies." (Pharisee) "The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of Palestine, were considered the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin. . At the present time, the Jewish people have no living central authority comparable in status to the ancient Sanhedrins or the later academies. Therefore, any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be based on the TALMUD as the final resume of the teaching of those authorities when they existed." ("The JEWS - Their History, Culture, and Religion", vol. 4, p. 1332, Jewish Publication Society of America, 1949).

"THE TALMUD: HEART'S BLOOD of the JEW-ISH FAITH", was the heading of the 11/17/59 install-

ment of a best-seller book by Herman Wouk which ran serially in the New York Herald - Tribune. To quote:

"The TALMUD is to this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs, or ceremonies we observe—whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists—we follow the TALMUD. It is our common law"

Why Was It So Often Burned?

Why is the Talmud kept so unknown to non-Jews? Why was there no English translation of the Talmud until the Soncino, 1934-48? Why, in European history, when the laws of the Talmud became commonly known, was it burned over and over by order of the Popes, excoriated by Martin Luther, denounced everywhere, and its followers exiled from one country after another down the centuries?

The TALMUD's basic law is that only the Pharisee ranks as a man, or human being. All others rank as animals: "the people who are like an ass—slaves who are considered the property of the master" The attitude resulting from such teaching has been resented by the "asses" in all countries and centuries. Such resentment, however, is always publicized as "persecution of the Jews".

Moses, on the contrary, was most insistent upon having one law for the stranger and for the "homeborn" and in teaching that the stranger must not be oppressed. (Exodus 12:49; Lev. 24:22; Num. 9:14:15:15-16, 29, etc, etc). In fact he ordered: "Love yetherefore the stranger: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt" (Deu. 10:19). It was only the abominators he warned against.

Was CHRIST JUST to PHARISEES?

Without some knowledge of the written form of the Tradition of the Pharisees, the Babylonian Talmud, one is unable to intelligently judge whether Jesus Christ was fair and just in His acid denunciations of Pharisaism, or not. One needs proof, offered by the irrefutable Exhibits from Jewish authorities herein, that the Talmud reverses every one of the Ten Commandments, the teachings of Moses and the Prophets, and enshrines their opposites under a "whited sepulchre", an Old Testament disguise for murder and "all uncleanness", as Christ charged. Murder of non-Pharisees is always permitted; theft, sodomy, incest, rape are all permitted, and the righteousness of grown men violating baby girls under three is a favorite topic for discussion in book after book of the Talmud. On the contrary, Our Lord's treatment of little children is like the Light of Heaven compared to the filth of Hell—embraced by the Talmud.

"Babylon the Great"

The very word BABYLON in the Bible is used to symbolize everything foul and pagan. It is agreed by commentaries that the curses upon Babylon in Isaiah 13, 14 and Jeremiah 50, 51 refer not merely to the Babylonian empire of ancient times but to the one to end this age.

Christ in His Revelation from the Spirit to John about 96 AD, said: "there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is "(in power)" and the other is not yet come. . .and goeth into perdition" (Rev. 17:10-). Five world kingdoms had then come and gone: Egypt Assyria, Babylonia, Medo-Persia, Greece. Rome was then in power over the whole known world. Christ describes the coming world government as red, or scarlet colored, as a behind-the-scenes or "MYSTERY" power, and calls it "BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS and ABOMINATIONS of the EARTH. . .drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus." The ten component parts of this world government which make war on the "Lamb", in this chapter: Rev. 17:12-14, as well as the prophecy of the satanic anti-Christ, correspond with the prophecy of Daniel the Prophet on the same ten-king anti-God power (Dan. 7:24-). But its complete defeat is chronicled in both places.

Now Comes the UNITED NATIONS

There has been no one world power since the eastern capitol or "leg" of the Roman empire, Constantinople, fell to the Turks in 1453, a thousand years after Rome fell to Attila the Hun in 453. Now the seventh anti-God world government has been set up by the Babylonian Talmudists. The American Jewish Year Books, put out yearly by the world czars of money, industrial and political power, encompassing the Rothschilds, Lazard Freres, Lehmans, Kuhn Loebs, etc, international bankers, in short, by the American Jewish Committee, have chronicled each and every step in their accomplishment, the creation of a vehicle for world power. The Red take-over of Christian Russia was financed by Kuhn Loeb & Co, as will be seen.

The UNITED NATIONS, of over a hundred nations centered in New York City, is a Godless, prayerless assemblage. Its only religious emblem, in Babylonian style, is the nude, lewd statue of the sex-god Zeus, counterpart of Tammuz, Adonis, etc, in ancient times. He stands, unspeakably modeled, arms outstretched, commanding the great entrance hall of the U.N.

When the Greeks conquered the world they spread the unifying propaganda that their sex-god Zeus, who had raped his mother and his sister, was also the progenitor of all the sex-gods of the far flung Greek world empire. He represents unity, in abomination and lust

Babylon, Mother of Harlots

Whereas Talmudic literature is one long paean of praise for the very name Babylon, and all that it means to Babylonian Talmudism today, it is a term of reproach in Old and New Testaments.

Note the Foreword to the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud. It is by the late Chief Rabbi of Great Britain who, like Rabbi Finklestein, was one of the 120 Jews chosen by the Kehillas of the world as best holding up the "lamp of Judaism" in 1937. Hertz starts out:

"The Talmud is the product of Palestine, the land of the Bible, and of Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilization. The beginnings of Talmudic literature date back to the time of the Babylonian Exile in the sixth pre-Christian century. . When a thousand years later, the Babylonian Talmud assumed final codified form in the year 500 after the Christian era, the Roman Western Empire had ceased to be" (See Exhibit 30).

Hertz extolls the Babylonian Exile, saying: "The Babylonian Exile is a momentous period...During that Exile Israel found itself. It not only rediscovered the Torah and made it the rule of life..."

"When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealing with what most people understand when they speak or write of the Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an autonomous Jewish center for a longer period than any other land; namely from soon after 586 before the Christian era to the year 1040 after the Christian era—1626 years" (Exhibit 34).

Talmudic Freudianism

With a dash of French or Latin, to create a facade of supposed "higher learning" or gnosis, the communist Pharisee, Sigmund Freud, was able to sell his degenerate Talmudic sex ideas as "scientific". That every baby girl supposedly suffers for sexual relations with her father, every little boy with his mother, violates all rules of nature, reality, and reason. It simply matches the depraved incessant teaching of the Talmud about it being morally correct for grown men to violate baby girls under three and commit sodomy with little boys (See Exhibits herein).

The Palestinian Talmud

If someone comes up with the argument that there is a Palestinian Talmud that is nice, you may look up the fact that authorities state it was lost for a thousand years, has missing parts and lacks Gemara, etc, and is only used as a scholar's curiosity. You may note the statement of Rabbi Hertz (Exhibit 33):

"The Palestianian Talmud. . .was for many centuries almost forgotten by Jewry. Its legal decisions were at no time deemed to possess validity, if opposed by the Babylonian Talmud".

Akiba Hooks On To The Bible

Hertz lauds Rabbi AKIBA (Exhibit 32):

"Akiba was the author of a collection of traditional laws out of which the Mishna actually grew. He was the greatest among the rabbis of his own and of succeeding times...His keen and penetrating intellect enabled him to find a Biblical basis for every provision of the Oral Law".

Gnosticism

Gnosticism has been defined as "a system of syncretizing, an attempt to blend opposite and contradictory tenets into one system to produce union and concord". Twice in Christ's message to the Church at Ephesus, He denounces the Nicolataines, a Gnostic cult (Rev. 2:6,15). "So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolataines, which thing I hate", He said. St. Ignatius, St. Clement, St. Irenaeus, St. Epiphany—early fathers of the Church, wrote with horror of the Nicolataines." St. Iraenaeus described a Christian deacon, Nicholas, as "the master of the Nicolataines." This and subsequent Gnostic cults assumed to find Christian dogmas to justify debauchery. To quote the French historian Lacroix:

"The doctrine which was most common among these hertics was that of community of women and the promiscuity of the sexes. The Carpocratians and Valestians professed that doctrine. Carpocratus, who had studied in the pagan school of Alexandria, was but a disciple of Epicurus, altho he called himself a Christian. He made of Jesus Christ, as a matter of fact, an epicurean philosopher".

altho the very name "Pharisees" means "separated ones". The basic Pharisee doctrine is that "only Pharisees are men" (humans,) and that Christ deserved FIVE sadistic deaths, including Crucifixion; that one should always speak against Him, unless this might endanger the interests of the Pharisees. The current propaganda for "co-existence with Khruschev" is a means of encompassing and strangling Christian liberty under Pharisaic Communism.

Christ Was Not Fooled

But Christ was not fooled by Pharisaic assumption of "gnosis". In Matthew 13 and Mark 7, He asked the Pharisees: "Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition? For God commanded, saying, Honor thy father and thy mother and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death".

Then Christ reminded them of the Pharisee custom of dedicating their goods to the Temple, then telling their needy parents that what they might have given them is now the property of God and they must do without, altho they themselves went on using the proceeds of their wealth for themselves.

As for cursing, the Talmud permits a man to curse his parents providing he does not use the four-letter word for Jehovah, Y-H-W-H, called the Tetragrammaton, in doing so. "May the Almighty, or Divine One, curse you to hell" would be perfectly proper.

As for the "sacredness" of the Tetragammaton word for Jehova. In current English Jewish publications the word God is frequently written "G-d". The Tetragrammaton written in full is reserved for the use of the Baal (Master) Shem (of the Name of God) who by using 14, 42, 72 letter combinations of the name is supposedly able to invoke spirits. Baal Shems are the Big-Shots of the Hassidic movement. At the beginning of the century, according to authorities, about half of Jewry was Hassidist. They have dynasties of rabbis called Rebbes, lean heavily on the Cabala and employ all sorts of occultism. The Bible, however commands:

"There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass thru the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times" (astrologer) "or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer" (Deu. 18:10-11). But the Baal Shem practices necromancy with Talmudic sanction.

The Talmud permits burning children to Molech and denies it is idolatry. To be correct you must burn ALL of them. For the most cruel, heartless rites this side of hell, read the section on Molech in the Commentary herein. See Talmud Exhibits 66-69.

A Priest's Wife

God commanded Moses to instruct the priests that they do not marry "a wife that is a whore, or profane... for he is holy unto his God" (Lev. 21:7). It seems reasonable that a man in God's service should have a wife of good character. This very Scriptural reference, you may note on Talmud Exhibit 82, is cited. The argument of the Beth (school or house of) Shammai is that if a woman has sex relations with her own little son, if he is under eight years and one day, she is pure enough to marry a priest. Hillel, always the more generous one, holds that the son may be a year older than that—nine years and one day—and the mother still remain pure. That is a characteristic Hillel ruling.

Hillel Honored Today

Rabbi Hertz on the second page of his Foreword (Exhibit 32) pays tribute to Hillel:

"The product of the feverish activity of the Pharisaic schools threatened to become too unwieldy to be retained by unassisted memory. For all the teaching was oral, and was not to be written down. The first effort at arrangement of the traditional material into a system was made in the first pre-Christian century by Hillel".

In Our Colleges

The Babylonian-born Hillel is honored with a Hillel center, or Foundation, run by B'naiB'rith, in most of our colleges. The American Jewish Year Book (1963) states that there are 241 of these Hillel centers, most of them in United States colleges. These are named in honor of the putrid-minded Hillel, as illustrated.

Ezekiel on Jerusalem Abominations

Between the first and last big deportation of Jews from Jerusalem to Babylonia (606-588 BC)—where the Jews were treated as colonists, Ezekiel the Prophet was carried away to Babylonia. About 595 BC he, in a God-given vision, is transported back to Jerusalem, whose citizens he had warned against their filthy ways. The God-sent one "said unto me", writes Ezekiel, when they saw the Temple: "Go in, and behold the wicked abominations that they do here. . .Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the Lord's house which was toward the north and behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. . .And he brought me into the inner court of the Lord's house, and behold, at the door of the temple of the Lord. . .were about five and twenty men. . .their faces toward the east and they worshipped the sun toward the east. Then he said unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of

man? Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here? for they have filled the land with violence, and have returned to provoke me with anger" (Ezekiel 8:9-17).

Greeting the Sun

Greeting the Sun is a Babylonian Talmudic ceremonial today. It takes place every 28 years. The last ceremony, which included a Government plane, according to the Jewish press, took place March 18, 1953. The next observance will be April 8, 1981.

The Sun, universally, in paganism, represented the male procreative spirit, the Moon the female. Tammuz was a Babylonian version of the sun god. The weeping for Tammuz, and his powers of human and agricultural fertility was a Babylonian ceremonial. Tammuz was also called Adonis, and the female counterpart Astarte, Mylitta, Venus, according to location.

The Schulchan Aruch Rules

The "religious" or synagogue calendar of Judaism today is the Babylonian lunar calendar. Each year the old Fast of Tammuz is celebrated from the 17th of Tammuz to the 9th of Ab. The Fast of Tammuz fell in 1963 on July 9th, and the 9th of Ab (or "Av") on July 30th.

The Schulchan Aruch, says the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, is the "standard authoritative source for Judaism. It is a compendium of the religious practices of the Jews", It was compiled by Joseph Caro, who died, 1575, in Palestine. A "kitzur" or condensed compilation of his work is on sale at Jewish bookstores (Rabbi Solomon Ganzfried, Hebrew Pub. Co., 79 Delancey St., N. Y.).

Sections CXXII to CXXV give directions for such petty observances as not bathing, or paring nails during the Tammuz fast. At its termination: "In the evening all enter the synagogue and take off their boots... All should be seated on the ground, and only a few lights are lit just sufficient to enable them to say Lamentations and the special lamentations. Lamentations and the special lamentations are likewise said in a low tone with a weeping intonation" (CXXIV, p. 60).

The excuse given for keeping up this typical pagan Babylonian custom is that one must mourn for the loss of the Jerusalem Temple (and the power it is intended to portend in the future under their Anti-Christ messiah). It was rebuilt in 1958 and dedicated by a plane load of British Jews, etc., including Isaac Wolfson, chain store operator, who was in the USA in 1963 raising more huge funds for Talmudic "Israel".

New Moon Days

Isaiah, the saintly prophet of Christ (760-698 BC), started right off in chapter 1 with his fulminations against Judah and Jerusalem. . .Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity. ..children that are corrupters. . .Except the Lord of hosts had left unto us a very small remnant, we should have been as Sodom. . . like unto Gomorrah. . .Bring no more vain oblations . . .the NEW MOONS and sabbaths. . .it is iniquity. . . Your NEW MOONS and your appointed feasts my soul hateth. . I am weary to bear them." (Isa. 1:1, 4, 9, 13-14).

Trachtenberg

Now, there are two New Moon Days celebrated monthly in the synagogue. Rabbi Joshua Trachtenberg, who has been listed in Who's Who in America, and in Jewry, authored the book "Jewish Magic and Superstition" (Behrman's Jewish Bookhouse, N.Y., 1939). In it he states:

"The pagan veneration of the new Moon, which had by no means disappeared in Biblical times, has no direct connection with the ceremony of blessing the new moon which was outlined in the Talmud and is observed to this day. But certain superstitious practices have been associated with the rite, pointing to its continued occult importance in human affairs. . . . In the first group are the practices of skipping three times at the close of the blessing, and addressing the moon three times: 'As I skip before you and do not reach you, so, if others jump before me may they not strike me,' and of then thrice bidding one's neighbor 'Peace be unto you.' The ceremony, as well as the threefold repetitions are typical of magical acts. In the latter group are the practice of shaking one's clothes 'to cast off the spirits,' and the belief that one who performed the full rite need not fear death during the ensuing month" (p. 256).

Babylon, Home of Harlotry

"The History of Prostitution" is a two-volume work by the French historian Paul Lacroix.

Herodutus

It was translated in 1931 and published by Covici Friede, Inc. It opens thus:

"It is in Chaldea, the ancient cradle of human society" (Note: The Bible refers to it as Chaldea, Shinar, as well as Babylonia) "that one must look for the first traces of Prostitution . . . Hear Herodutus, the venerable Father of History and the oldest collector of the Traditions of the world: "The BABYLONIANS have a very shameful law; every woman born in the land is obliged, once in her life, to repair to the Temple of Venus to give herself to a stranger. A number of them, proud of their riches, and disdaining to mingle with

the others, have themselves brought to the temple in covered chariots. There they remain seated, with, behind them, a great number of domestics who have accompanied them; but most of the others take their seats in the piece of land adjoining the Temple of Venus, with a crown of fig-leaves about the head. They come and go. One sees lanes separated by ropes which have been stretched; the strangers walk up and down these lanes and choose the women who please them most. When a woman has taken her place in this line, she is not permitted to return home until some stranger has cast silver upon her knees and had intercourse with her outside the sacred place. It is required that the stranger, in casting the silver, say to her: 'I invoke the goddess Mylitta.' Now the Assyrians give to Venus the name of Mylitta. However modest the sum it cannot be refused: the law forbids it, for this silver becomes sacred. She follows the first one who tosses her silver, and it is not permitted her to repulse anyone. Finally, when she has been acquitted of what she owed the goddess, by abandoning herself to a stranger, she returns home. . . "

Strabo

"Herodutus had seen with his own eyes, about the year 440 BC, Sacred Prostitution among the women of Babylon. . . . Three centuries and a half after him, another traveler, Strabo, also bore witness to these disorderly practices, and the latter tells us that all the women of Babylon obeyed the oracle by giving their bodies to a stranger whom they looked upon as a guest. . . . One understands how the constant spectacle of Sacred Prostitution must have corrupted the manners of Babylon. . . . Alexander the Great himself had been terrified by Babylonian debauchery, when he went there to take part in it and to die. 'There is null other more corrupt than this people,' reports Quintus Curtius, one of the historians of the conquerors of Babylon. .

Babylon Bears Fruit

"The example of Babylon had borne fruit, and the cults of Mylitta had been propagated, with the Prostitution which accompanied it, in Asia and in Africa, even to the interior of Egypt, as of Persia; but in each of these countries the goddess took a new name and her cult affected new forms, under which there always reappeared Sacred Prostitution" (p. 20).

Weeping for Tammuz"

religious literature of Babylonia Tammuz appears as the youthful spouse or lover of Ishtar, the great mother goddess . . . every year Tammuz was believed to die . . . every year his divine mistress journeyed in quest of him. . . . During her absence the passion of love ceased to operate; men and beasts alike forgot to reproduce their kinds: all life was threatened with extinction. . . . His death appears to have been annually mourned . . . by men and women about midsummer in the month named after him, the month of TAMMUZ. . ."A Babylonian dirge of lament for Tammuz is quoted (pp. 379-80), one line after another starting with the words: "Her lament is for. . ." Reproductive proclivity is the object. The same unspeakably obscene rites carried on for the god Molech are described by Lacroix—unnatural as well as "Sacred Prostitution" acts were part of the tribute to TAMMUZ. Why do Pharisees today cherish that observance?

New Year for Trees

Another of the regular Babylonian Talmudic synagogue festivals today is "New Year for Trees." Its Talmudic name is "Hamishshah-'asar bi-shevat," under which title it is listed in the Babylonian, which is the synagogue, calendar, given in the American Jewish Year Books. It falls on the 15th of Shevat, which in our calendar, in 1964, is January 29th.

Tree worship, one of the oldest forms of paganism, is based on the belief that trees are inhabited by spirits of fecundity. The article "New Year for Trees" in the Jewish Encylopedia (1905) cites Gittin 57a of the Talmud on the custom of planting a cedar tree for every new born male and a cypress tree for every female. "When a marriage was about to take place the trees were cut down and used as posts for the nuptial canopy."

The Bible on Trees

Still quoting: "The extent of its worship" (the tree) "is indicated also by the denunciations of the Prophets. A favorite phrase of theirs in describing idolatrous" (sex) "practices as 'upon every hill and under every green tree' (Deut. 12:2; Jer. 2:20). . . . As has been pointed out, the Prophets were unable completely to suppress tree-worship, which has survived in Palestine through all religious changes to the present day."

Cabalistic Practice

. The article tells how the Cabalists when they settled in Palestine in the 16th century, instituted the custom of eating fruits on that day, instead of planting trees. The Christian reader may be perplexed at Biblical excoriations against trees. The fact was that owing to the fertility myth, individual and mass harlotry was carried on under trees, and these were planted for that purpose in groves.

Two kings of Judah were commended, Hezekiah and Josiah, because they "cut down the groves" (II Kings 18:4 and 23:14). God promised Moses He would bless the people he was leading into Palestine providing they drove out the pagan abominators, the Canaanites, saving:

"Take heed lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants whither thou goest, lest it be for a snare.... But ye shall destroy their altars . . . and cut down their groves" (Exodus 34: 12-13). "Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods . . . under every green tree. And ye shall . . . burn their groves with fire" (Deut. 12:2-3). Deuteronomy 7:5, etc., repeat the same command. This was about 1450 BC.

Today

Since the Babylonian Talmudists acquired Palestine in 1948, formal tree planting has gone on at a feverish pace. Groves are being planted in "honor" of various characters. President Kennedy is slated to have a grove of 50,000 trees in his honor, around Jerusalem.

"TREE PLANTING TO BE HOLIDAY EVENT" headed the report:

"Jewish people the world over will celebrate the New Year for Trees, Tu B'Shvat. . . . As has been the custom for many years, the Jewish National Fund will observe the holiday by planting trees in Israel" (California Jewish Press, 1/31/58).

In view of the millions upon millions of dollars of taxpayers' money given to "Israel," it is suitable that a forest in honor of the USA Government, "American Freedom Forest," was proposed: "It is to serve as a living monument to the friendship and close cooperation existing between the citizens and governments of the United States and Israel" (B'naiB'rith Messenger 7/8/60).

Now that the Anti-Christ Talmudists possess Palestine, as predicted by Scripture, there promises to be if current reports are any indication, more groves in Palestine than Moses and the Prophets ever ordered to be cut down or burned.

BABYLON Never Forgotten

Reproduced herein are two pages of the Jewish Encylopedia article on "BABYLONIA" (Exhibits 295-6). These illustrate the proud and devoted attitude of present day Pharisaism toward Babylonia: the "vatican", the glory, and source of their Pharisee tradition, the TALMUD. Until 1040 AD, we read, the Talmud-Cabala academies in Babylonia shone—then finally closed to pollute the rest of the world, moving up thru Spain and across Europe. We read that "the Academy of SURA. . .reached a point of unprecedented splendor. . PUMBEDITA. . .in 1040 also

passed away after an existence of 800 years. . . Babylonian learning should be transplanted to Europe. . . This forms an appropriate point at which to consider the general influence of Babylonia upon European Judaism. . . the West received both the written and the Oral Law from Babylonia."

"Babylonia, however, still continued to be regarded with reverence by Jews in all parts. . . the Jews of Abyssinia placed the sages of Babylon first in their prayers. . .a similar prayer, although it has quite lost its application, is extant today in many congregations . . ." There is more of same, extolling Babylon the Great (See Exhibit 296).

The CARALA

The existence of a spirit world, of evil spirits, is mentioned thruout the Bible. Christ drove out possessing spirits. There is one hard and fast rule taught on the subject, however: namely, to leave them alone, do no invoking or communicating with them. It is clear that the gangster elements could deceive the finite powers of human beings.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me", is the First Commandment. And that you shall do no bowing to, or serving them, is the Second Commandment (Exodus 20:3-5).

Whereas the Bible represents God as the Supreme Intelligence, Creator and Ruler, the pagan and atheist concept is pantheism. In other words, there is a great nature essence, out of which individual lives perk blindly without direction. "Pan" (nature) "theism" (god-ism) holds that the sum of nature is god. MAN is the Big-Shot Luciferian. It is foretold in Biblical prophecy that the Anti-Christ will personify that attitude (Isaiah 14:12-19; Daniel 11:36-8; Matt. 24:15; Mark 13:14).

Babylonia

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943), on the "Cabala". states:

"Altho Palestine was the birthplace of Jewish mysticism, the land where the Cabala was conceived, it was in Babylonia that it attained its greatest importance". It cites "the mystic speculations of the TALMUD and the system of the CABALA, originating in the one and reaching its completion in the other".

The Cabala is a library of literature, all on magic, spiritism, based on sheer pantheism. "Aaron ben Samuel is credited with bringing the mysterious doctrine from Babylonia to Italy about the middle of the ninth century; thence it spread to almost all the Christian countries of Europe" (p. 616). Cabala, also spelled Kabbalah, means "tradition", and it is the tradition of the paganisms of Babylon, Egypt, and the pagan philosophers. The ZOHAR (book of Splendor)

has been translated in several large volumes. It is more degenerately sexy, if that were possible, than the Talmud itself.

The world is explained by a chart representing three copulating triads: male, female and offspring—given fantastic names. The EN SOF surrounding these is the god-essence which percolates thru the three sets back into itself. Admittedly, the Cabala is pantheism. If God has no intelligence—out the window goes the Bible as His inspired Word. To quote:

"God is the infinite, unlimited being, to whom one neither can nor may ascribe any attributes whatever, who can therefore be designated merely as En SOF = 'without end' " (Jewish Ency., "Cabala", p. 472). Describing the ten sephirot, which include the three spawning triads, the same source designates as "Yesod = 'foundation' the reproductive element, the root of all existence" (p. 475). Under the same title, the 1943 Universal Jewish Ency. emphasizes the same idea: "But the En Sof, being boundless, cannot become the direct creator, for He has neither will, intention, desire thought, language, nor action, attributes which belong to finite beings" (p. 619). And Metatron is given top place as boss of this world.

Metatron

Metatron is the prince of this world, the "demiurge" in the Talmud and Cabala. He is the same as the Persian sun god MITHRA, according to the Jewish Ency. ("Metatron").

While the Talmud-Cabala explains life as a series of blind "EMANATIONS", the fond stooge of the Talmudists, Darwin, explains life as self development from matter, equally blind and without a Chief Engineer. Marx, in his Talmudic formula for world power, calls the same Cabalistic process "dialectical materialism", leading to Communism.

The "theoretical Cabala" is the idea of emanations noted above, The "theurgic" or "practical" Cabala is a set of formulae embracing voodoo of all kinds including bloody rites. These, which are copied from the master by the pupil, have found their way into museums. "Ritual Magic" by E. M. Butler, Cambridge University Professor, is a documented book on this (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1949). Under "Blood Accusation", the Jewish Ency. (1905) lists some 122 outstanding cases brought to trial involving ritual murder. Thirty nine of these, from one end of Europe to the other, took place in the 19th century.

Letters Create the World - Not God

Note in Exhibit 285 herein that thru the Cabala "one may thus easily make himself master of creation"—a Luciferian idea. Also wild animals can be slain and "terror diffused through the world". Note in Exhibit

Cabala Exalts the Jew

The Cabala, says the Jewish Ency., taught the top position of man, "the true Jewish view of life, and one that appealed to Talmudic Judaism. The Jew as well as the man was recognized in the Cabala. Notwithstanding the strongly pantheistic coloring of its metaphysics, the Cabala never attempted to belittle the importance of historic Judaism, but, on the contrary, emphasized it. . the cabalists developed a Jewish Magic" (p. 478) ". . .Demonology, therefore, occupies an important part in the works of many cabalists. . .many cabalists developed their theories on CASTING of LOTS, NECROMANCY, EXORCISM. . . ASTROLOGY was legitimized and bibliomancy found its justification in the assumption that the sacred Hebrew letters are not merely signs for things but implements of divine powers by means of which nature may be subjugated" (p. 479).

Isaiah on Anti-Christ

For a perfect description of the above spirit, we have Isaiah's picture of the Anti-Christ in Isaiah 14: 12-17 This is a description of the fall of the Babylonian World Power at the end of this age, the end of the seventh world government we are now living under:

"They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee... saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?"

That last reminds one of the vast concentration camps housing millions under Communism.

Fall of Babylon

It is recognized by Bible scholars universally that the fulminations against Babylon by Isaiah 13, 14, and by Jeremiah 51, refer not merely to the Babylon existing in their day, but look down the coming centuries to the end of the age and the coming of a new era. The similar excoriations against Babylon by Jesus Christ from the Spirit about 96 AD, over 600 years after the fall of literal Babylon, had, necessarily, to refer to a future World Government controlled by the whore-like Babylonian mind, anti-God, anti-Christ, in other words:

"MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. . .drunken with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus". Its scope is likened to a beast with ten horns which are ten kings that will reign very briefly—"one hour". The HARLOT "reigneth over the kings of the earth" (Rev. 17). For the complete control of trade and industry by "her merchants", read Rev. 18:11-.

See how similarly Jeremiah and Christ describe the final crash. Jeremiah ends his long denunciation in chapter 51 thus: "And it shall be, when thou hast made an end of reading this book, that thou shalt bind a stone to it and cast it into the midst of the Euphrates: And thou shalt say, Thus shall Babylon sink, and shall not rise from the evil that I will bring upon her. . Thus far are the words of Jeremiah" (Jer. 51:63-4).

And Christ, after prophesying the fall of the Red, anti-Christ whorelike Babylonian world power run by rich men, says: "And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all. . .thy merchants were the great men of the earth: for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived". Then the last verse, on the Babylonian Harlot:

"And in her was found the blood of PROPHETS, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth" (Rev. 18:24).

In Matthew 23, when Christ was facing the Pharisees eye to eye and calling them "Hypocrites!", again and again, He said: "...Ye are the children of them that killed the PROPHETS. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents...how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify...and persecute them from city to city: That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from the blood of Abel..." (Matt. 23:31-5).

Babylonian Pharisaism

Thus did Christ link the Pharisees of His time with the rulers of the Babylonian Red World Power to come and be sunken like a stone in deep water. A reading of the twaddle and blasphemy of the Babylonian Talmud of today throws new light upon the words Christ used against Pharisaism in Matthew 23: "Ye fools and blind... ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayers..." He denounced their strutting. He said they shut the kingdom of heaven to others and refused to go in themselves, etc. etc.

Proselytes

But are all of Christ's denunciations for the Pharisees themselves? He said: "ye compass land and sea to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves" (Matt. 23:15). Strong words.

"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one and love the other: or he will hold to the one and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon" (Matt. 6:24). The "disciple whom Jesus loved"—John—in his second Epistle, is even more pointed, saying: "If there come any unto you and bring not this doctrine" (that Jesus is the Christ) "receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds" (II John 10-11). "Hate the evil, and love the good, and establish judgment in the gate", said the Prophet Amos (5:15).

"Them Which Say They are Jews" (Rev. 2:9)

"I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan", said Christ from the Spirit to John, about 96 AD. At that time, when the Scripture believers had accepted Christ and called themselves Christians, and the Sadducees had disappeared, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia, the Pharisees were in complete control and Judaism was synonymous with Pharisaism (See Exhibit 264).

What Did Christ Mean?

Whether or not they were lineal descendants of the patriarch Judah, a sinner, was not the issue. They had had access to the word of God and. instead, adopted a pagan Tradition which nullified, as Christ said, the commandments of God (Matt. 15:3-9; Mark 7:5-9). He said: "Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition".

Faith in God and His Word was the test. As Paul said: "For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly...

But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly. . . in the spirit. . . whose praise is not of men, but of God" (Romans 2:28-9). Again, Paul made it clear that the promise of blessing thru Abraham was Christ. "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made, He saith not. . . seeds, as of many, but as of one. . . which is Christ. . .

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise" (Galations 3:16, 28-9).

The saintly Prophet Isaiah was a prophet indeed when, after recounting the abominable practices of the Iudah tribe, he foretold:

"And ye shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord God shall slay thee, and call his servants by another name" (Isaiah 65:15). And this is but a few sentences after his Godly prophecy that Christ would be born from the line of Judah:

"Thus saith the Lord...I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains" (Jerusalem) "and mine elect shall inherit it... but ye are they that forsake the Lord..." (Isaiah 65:9-).

Christ Born of Judah

It is as anti-Biblical to enthrone the abominationserving Pharisees of today as it is to deny that Christ was born, as foretold, thru Judah. Otherwise, He has not yet come. To Abraham, to Isaac, his son, to Jacob ("Israel"), his grandson, to David, of the same line, was a special revelation made that the Christ would be their descendant, according to the flesh. That line identified Him when He came. It did not furnish His Divinity. As Paul said: "it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah" (Hebrews 7:14).

The patriarch Jacob, about 1700 BC had foretold that He would be. On his deathbed, he likened the coming Christ to Shiloh, where rested the tablemacle of God. Jacob said:

"The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until SHILOH come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be" (Gen. 49:10).

And the semblance of a Judah kingdom in Palestine did not disappear until after Christ was born there.

JEWS NOT A RACE OR TRIBE

The question arises whether the boasts of present day Pharisees "which say they are Jews" have any genealogical backing. Are the so-called Jews of today descendants of the patriarch Judah? The Bible is the best answer to this. And the answer is that they are not. There was barely enough record in Christ's time to identify Him and a few of His followers, as descend-

ants of a certain Israel tribe, Paul being a Benjaminite, etc.

Anti-Semitism" a Myth

At a recent Bible conference I sat next to a little blue-eyed lady with a German accent who kept boasting: "I am Jewish!" Finally, I asked her two questions which silenced her. One was: "How do you know you are Jewish? How far back can you trace your ancestry to the patriarch Judah of about 1700 BC?" No answer. When she agreed she had been trained in the Talmud in her synagogue, before she was "converted" to Christianity, and I replied that I had spent some twenty years on that subject, a terrible silence fell and she sought to escape while we sang the next hymn. She had never met a "goy" who knew what "Jewishness" meant, before, and was unable to cope with the situation. She had posed as a star with the Christians, previously, assuming to be a sort of "cousin" to Jesus.

Shem, Ham and Japeth were the three race-founding sons of Noah. To be a Semite one must descend from Shem, just as to be a Jew, genealogically, one must descend from Judah. Ham was the father of the abominating Canaan who mistreated Noah sexually (Genesis 9:25), and Canaan's descendants who peopled the Land of Canaan had the same proclivities. That is why Moses, in leading the Israelites back from Egypt in 1491 BC., warned them to make no marriages, no alliances with the Canaanites or they might lose their faith and decency.

But what is the Biblical record? Moses died in 1451 BC and Joshua actually led the Israelites into Canaan, or Palestine. They had been told in no uncertain terms that they could choose between life and death, blessing and cursing: "A blessing if ye obey the commandments of the Lord your God...And a curse if ye will not" (Deu. 11:26-8; 30:19-20). They were to drive out the Canaanite abominators, make no marriages or deals with them. The sons of the cursed Canaan fathered the Jebusites, Amorites, Girgasites, Hivites, Arkites, Sinites, Arvadites, Zemarites and Hamathites, according to Genesis 10:15-18 and I Chronicles 1:13-16.

A reading of the books of Joshua and Judges will show that instead of driving out these Canaanite tribes, the Israelites mixed with them all and adopted their abominations. That is the reason the Prophets thundered and threatened until the northern tentribe Israel kingdom was deported by the Assyrians in 721 and "lost" by being strewn across their world empire.

Were JEWS Ever Pure Semites

Jacob, called "Israel", had twelve tribe-founding sons. Three of them started their tribes by marrying non-Semites. JUDAH married a Canaanite (descendant of Ham not Sem or Shem). See Genesis 38. His offspring were as Hamitic as they were Semitic from the start. Four hundred years later, around 1300 BC, Judah's half-Hamitic son Shelah's descendants were weavers and potters (I Chronicles 2:3; 4:21-3). They were still producing "Jews". SIMEON, another of Israel's tribe-founding sons married a Canaanite (Gen. 46:10). Israel's son JOSEPH married the daughter of the Hamitic Potiphar in Egypt. Egypt was settled and peopled by Mizraim, son of Ham. It was called "the land of Ham" (Num. 12:1; Psalms 78:51; 106:22; 105:23).

Named in Genesis 49 are the twelve sons of Jacob or "Israel": Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Zebulon, Issachar, Dan, Gad, Asher, Napthali, Joseph, Benjamin

In monotonous repetition the books of Joshua and Judges record that altho the Israelites were triumphant in their battles against the Canaanites, they let the abominators remain and intermarried with them. For example: "but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day" (Joshua 15:63). "Neither did Ephraim" (also Manasseh) "drive out the Canaanites... but the Canaanites dwelt among them..." Other verses of the first chapter of Judges start the same way: "Neither did Zebulon... Neither did Asher... Neither did Napthali... drive out the Canaanites... And the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem; but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem to this day." (Judges 1:21).

"And the children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites, Hittites, and Amorites and Perizzites and Hivites, and Jebusites. And they took their daughters to be their wives, and gave their daughters to their sons and served their gods. And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord. . .and served Baalim and the groves" (Judges 3:5-7).

From 1095 to 975 BC there was a united Israel kingdom under Kings Saul, David and Solomon. Then the ten-tribe northern Israel kingdom divided and lasted until deported by the Assyrians in 721 BC. The Judah-Benjamin Jerusalem kingdom lasted until

606 when deported by the Babylonians. The denunciations of the Israel kingdom are superlative on the ground of mixing with abominators, making "altars to sin." "Ephraim" (the dominant Israel tribe) "hath mixed himself among the people" (Hosea 7:8; 8:9,11, etc.). Isaiah called them "the drunkards of Ephraim" (Isa. 28:1,3). The charges of mixing with abominators, whoring "under every green tree" (Isa. 57:5; Deut. 12:2) hardly builds up a foundation of genealogical purity.

The Pharisee Myth Today

The miracle of how Pharisaism has convinced the Christian world that its adherents stem from a pure Judah-Israel racial stock cannot be fathomed. since Christians have access to the Biblical record, itself. In Christ's time, when the Pharisees boasted that they were children of Abraham, John and Christ threw the boast back into their faces (Matt. 3:7-10; John S: 33-44). When the little German lady who boasted to me of her Jewishness at the Bible conference, said, "We are children of Abraham", I replied: "Lots of people are. In fact. God changed Abram's name to Abraham, meaning a 'father of many nations', saying: 'for a father of many nations have I made thee' (Gen. 17:5). Abraham did not just father the tribe of Judah. Thru his grandson, Jacob, came the 12 mixed-blooded tribes of Israel. He had 16 offspring by Keturah who fathered a horde of eastern peoples, Midians, Arabs, etc. Thru his son Ishmael, born of the Hamitic Egyptian Hagar, twelve separate nations were founded. The great blessing promised thru Abraham was CHRIST". She did not reply, nor repeat her Jewish "ownership" of Abraham.

Moses was not a Jew. He was a Levite on both sides (Exodus 2:1). Abraham, his son Isaac, and his son Jacob, called "Israel". were not Jews. Only one of Jacob's twelve sons turned out Jews—that was Judah. Grabbing the whole Bible, as modern Pharisees do, is false. It is likewise false for Christians to deny the identifying genealogy of Christ thru Judah, as Biblically foretold.

A Pharisee Sect

There have been Chinese "Jews" for centuries, India "Jews", Falasha Negro "Jews", people of every race and nation who adopted Pharisaism and took on the boasts that this sect made them "God's Chosen People". The Negro Jews of New York City are in 1964 asking for money for a new synagogue, claiming that they number about 120,000 members and maintain five synagogues and need money for a new one. Marilyn Monroe, Negro Sammy Davis, and many others have been notable additions to the Pharisee sect of "Chosen People". The great sweep of Asiatic "Kha-

zars" who adopted Pharaism in the 8th century, under King Bulan, and constitute the Ashkenazi Jews of Russia. Poland and Germany, are but one injection into what Christ called "the synagogue of Satan". You may read up on them in Jewish encyclopedias, in Col. Beatty's Iron Curtain Over America", etc., etc.

Why Do They "Look Jewish"?

A long article with pictures and charts in the Jewish Encyclopedia (1905) seeks to answer the question as to why there is a recognizable "Jewish look" to so many self-styled "Jews". Percentages of blonde and branette types, their origin, skull formations, etc., are discussed.

Then, to quote: "What is popularly known as 'the Jewish type' is not a correlation of definite anthropological measures or characteristics, but consists principally in a peculiar expression of face, which is immediately and unmistakably recognized as 'Jewish' in a large number of cases. . It has also been remarked that persons who do not have the Jewish expression in their youth acquire it more and more as they grow from middle to old age". Illustrations of how Negroes, as well as Gentile adults and children, recognized this Jewish look, are related. That the "look" is not racial is illustrated by "the Little Russians, who apparently resemble their Gentile neighbors in every facial characteristic, but are differentiated from them by some subtle nuance which distinguishes them as Semites" (!). "It is seemingly some social quality which stamps their features as distinctly Jewish". (TYPES, ANTHROPOLOGICAL").

The Anti-Defamation League of B'naiB'rith (130 N. Wells St., Chicago) issued a series of leaflets for Fireside Discussion Groups. Number 7 is entitled::"Three Questions Jews Must Answer". The question "Are Jews a Race?" is answered, briefly, with the conclusion that Jews are part of a "general admixture" of races. "Are Jews a Nation?" is answered with the idea that Jews form parts of all nations; that some of them have the Zionist ideal of a Palestinian nation but "Jews have a consciousness of world unity". To quote: Jews are "definitely a type, and consciously a unity, we are an historic people—a world community."

The question "Are Jews a Religion?" is answered by the assertion that "There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who are unbelievers. Yet they still consider themselves Jews". The incident of Jews converted to Christianity asking to help build a Jewish Palestine is related. "It is true that there are hundreds of thousands of atheist Jews, but they need not fear to be represented by Judaism. Of this they may be sure: that Judaism will not misrepresent them".

This is a good place to stop and agree on that point Aside from the "whited sepulchre," the showmanship

and trimmings of so-called "Judaism", its basic doctrine is that God is the "EnSof", a nature essence which has no attributes and can neither know nor be known. That IS atheism and the basis of all pagan pantheism. Communism merely calls the same concept "dialectical materialism". Darwin, mouthpiece of his Talmudic cohorts, labeled it "Evolution". The blind perkings of Evolution correspond to the cabalistic "Emanations" of the "EnSof". The article ends:

"In a race-mad world, we will not be one more race. In a world destroyed by nationalism we will not add one more nationalistic fury. But in a world in which religion is trying to re-establish brotherhood, we... (are) the creators and bearers of one of the eternal faiths of the human race."

But is Pharisaism an "eternal" faith of the "human" race?

In truth, Pharisaism teaches that ONLY Pharisees are "men" or humans (Exh. 268). This is its basic law. But that "the synagogue of Satan", as Christ called Pharisaism (Rev. 2:9; 3:9) is to be "eternal", is denied by the whole Bible.

Pharisaic "brotherhood" in atheistic Communism, in a world having no nationalism except Pharisaism, is built on Satan's, not God's plan. The final world-despot Anti-Christ will fall. As the Prophet Micah (710 BC) foretold of the future kingdom of Christ on earth: "they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree: and none shall make him afraid" (Micah 4:4). No more prison-like collectives, no more swooping down upon Katanga Christians to force their "brotherhood" with the enemies of Christ.

A Jewish Editorial

With the outside of the "whited Sepulchre" of Pharisaism represented as "God's Chosen People", "People of the Book", and the inside of the sepulchre denying every teaching of the Book, it is no wonder that the Hillel Summer Institute "in a program entitled, 'Ask the Rabbi'," seeks to "clarify" the thoughts of Jewish college students on such questions as this:

"Is God necessary for morality?"

"Since, according to philosophy, God's existence cannot be proven, how then can a Jewish student, after being exposed to philosophical thought, get the necessary faith to believe in God?" The National Jewish Post (3/4/64) editorially praises Hillel for "being willing to bring the questions in the open. This is maturity", is their comment.

Cause of the Jewish "Look"

The B'naiB'rith pamphlet previously quoted states: "We want a world in which nationalism shall definitely diminish". However, Jews feel "they belong to one world unity. When the Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492, the Jewry of northern Africa received them.

When the Jews were expelled from Germany during the crusades, the nascent Jewry of Poland received them. When they were expelled from Poland in 1648, the reconstituted German community received them in turn; and when Eastern Europe sent its Jewish... eviles across the world, American Jewry helped them find a home; they have always welcomed their own exiles...We are the children of...a great and noble tradition. We were united by that tradition. Whenever a scholar in northern Africa wrote a new commentary on the TALMUD, it was read on the shores of the North Sea by another scholar, and whenever a rabbi along the Rhine became known in the field of Talmudic jurisprudence, his fame spread to Spain and even to Mesopotamia. They were united by one spiritual culture, ... It is not race, so-called, but it is spiritual culture which has made us one".

As a man "thinketh in his heart so is he" (Proverbs 23:7). The gangster, the woman of the streets, acquire a "look", not evident in the cradle. A glance at the photos of leading Jews in Jewish Who's Whos reveals a striking "Talmudic look". Isaiah the prophet in denouncing the Judah tribe for their abominations said:

"The show of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves!" (Isa. 3:9). Sodomy in general, and specifically with little children, dead bodies, neighbors' wives and one's own wife is permitted by the TALMUD. (See Indexed Commentary, "Sodomy").

Talmudism is Communism

One of the perpetual difficulties of the Talmudists is putting Communism into power and then concealing the Talmudic origin and direction of it. That "Jewish look" arouses what is foolishly called "anti-Semitism" (actually anti-Pharisaism) on the part of the stabled "people who are like an ass—slaves who are considered the property of the master" (Kethellla), as the Talmud designates all non-Pharisees.

In Washington today, the Talmudic character of the chief advisors and wheel horses of the Jew Deal Jew Frontier, etc, is apparent to all familiar with the situation. After World War II which was used to extend Communism over much of Europe, drastic purges were necessary to stop the incitation to mass reprisals on "Jews" by their enslaved victims. The official reports of the czars of world banking, industry and political power, the American Jewish Committee, in their own American Jewish Year Books, reported this in detail.

The State Department Paper

You may note in the official US State Department Papers, relating to Russia in 1918 (Exhibits 243-261) that Jews were most prominent in the Red Russian Revolution. Also that Jacob Schiff, then head of Kuhn Loeb & Co., was financing Lenin and Trotsky thru Max Warburg, a Hamburg Jewish banker whose brother was married to Schiff's daughter; that Kerensky was their agent.

Oudendyke Report

Also reproduced is the suppressed report of Mr. Oudendyke, the Netherlands Minister who had taken over British affairs at the moment. He sent this message to various governments including our own. It includes this:

"The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other Governments to the fact that if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once the civilization of the whole world will be threatened. This is not an exaggeration. . .I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging and unless as above stated Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. . " (Exhibits 258-9).

The Spy Cases - Change of Line

In 1950 the American press was seething with the cases of Red Spies, atomic and otherwise, who had long been operating to sell out American secrets to the Soviets. The Rosenbergs, Harry Gold, etc, were convicted. The code messages carried to and from Jacob Epstein, "a Communist agent in Mexico City," by a USA Communist agent, were exposed. Abraham Brothman and Miriam Moskowitz were convicted as spies. "FBI HANDS TIED AFTER AGENTS TRAP RED SPIES", headed the 2/18/50 report of Willard Edwards of the Chicago Tribune concerning Nathan G. Silvermaster, Russian born Jew, J. Peters, alias Isador Boorstein, and others. One thing in common was that the spies who were Communist agents were Jewish.

The American Jewish Committee, whose emphasis is on their "global responsibility" to Jewry, was not idle. In their American Jewish Year Book, Vol. 53, (1952), was this:

"The widely publicized recent indictments and trials for espionage, the evidence brought forth at investigative hearings and elsewhere, gave rise early

"During 1950. . we stressed the role of the Jew in the fight against Communism. We have employed the mass media to feature the activities of Jewish individuals who vigorously oppose Communist totalitarianism. . we have enlisted the active participation, thru our chapters, of Jewish groups in such enterprises as the CRUSADE for FREEDOM. . . We have also exerted our influence to dissociate Jews themselves from the activities of Communists and fellow-travelers . . . The Jewish Peoples Fraternal Order" (Note: Communist E. D.) "and other organizations of like character have recently been disaffiliated from Jewish communities in various parts of the country—an action strongly urged by our chapters" (p. 554). And to show what good "nationalists" these anti-nationalists are, to quote: "we have promoted such campaigns as CRUSADE for FREEDOM and such celebrations as 'I AM AN AMERICAN DAY'". (p. 557). The fight to get Jewish organizations to cease having known Communist speakers, and to cut out having paid Communists employed by their outfits, went on, we are told, "with such success that today we can report that the major Communist-dominated group has been eliminated from all but three of the (Community) Councils" (p. 555).

The control of American Legion activities, the dizzy use of periodicals reaching millions of people with propaganda articles written by the American Jewish Committee, plus their writing of Faith and Freedom readers for Catholic Schools, all sorts of material for the National Council of Churches, the Methodist church, the propaganda work on the Genocide Convention, which became part of international law January 8, 1951, and aims to punish anyone who causes a group (Jews) "mental harm": work on the United Nations, their creation—it is all so factual, so fantastic as to defy description. It must be studied to be believed

Foreign Purges

With Communism triumphant over much of Europe, the blatant "Jewish look" had also to be taken from the Communist governments abroad so as to disguise these governments as native ones, instead of the Jewish authored and run vehicles which they are.

Country by country the action taken to purge the face of the Communist government of the "Jewish look" is taken up in detail in the American Jewish Year Books. The propaganda given the general public is that the Communists are "anti-Jewish".

In Czechoslovakia

The Czechoslovakian purge, beginning 1949, went thru three stages. "Its first victims were high officials in the office of the Premier, and in the ministries of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade, and Information". And a string of Jews are mentioned. Their dismissals were not publicized at first; some "just disappeared". In 1951, some were reported to have been arrested for espionage and treason.

Then in 1950, we are told, the second stage of the purge began "concentrated around Secretary General Rudolph Slansky, a Jew," as part of a "conspiracy" to overthrow the government and restore capitalism! In 1951 Slansky was arrested. To quote:

"An Astonishing Number of Jews"

"Among his 'co-conspirators' arrested at the beginning of 1951, were an astonishing number of Jews." (Note: Indeed!) "These included Vitezslav Fuchs, Party Secretary in Ostrava; Hanus Lomsky (Lieben). son of a rabbi and Party Secretary in Pizen; Ruzena Dubova, a Party Secretary in Brno; Gen. Bedtich Rejcin; head of the Army Intelligence; and Ervin Polak, Deputy Minister of the Interior. Those arrested were either Party leaders from the districts where unrest in the factories was greatest, or Party agents in the most unpopular units of the army and police. ..." More Jews are named: "After the arrest of Slansky, the purge of the Jews became general". Purged Jews included: "Bedrich Geminder, former representative of the Czechoslovak Communist Party in the COMINFORM; Gustav Bares (Breitenfeld), Deputy Secy. General and chief of Party propaganda; Koloman Mosko (Moskowitz), one of the four chief Party secretaries in Slovakia; Ludvik Frejka (Freund), one of the authors of the Czechoslovak Five-Year Plan; Josef Goldman, Deputy Chief of the Planning Office; Rudolph Margolius, Deputy Minister of Foreign Trade; Zikmund Stein, trusted Party lawyer and legal adviser of the Soviet embassy.

"The purge was most conspicuous in the diplomatic service...Among those recalled..." and a string of ambassadors to countries like Great Britain, our own, Argentina, Switzerland, East Germany, etc, are named. We are told: "...these victims were Communists, some of them of long standing. . .some were of German-Jewish descent..." (Vol. 54, 1953, pp. 345-9).

The emigration of Jews to Israel is cited. These purges were always used to also fill up Palestine. No country run solidly by a Jewish mass, can "purge" that government without a higher Jewish hand providing the force. The world banking of Rothschilds, Lazard Freres, Lehmans, Kuhn, Loeb & Co., etc., international Jewish bankers, industrialists and "kingmakers," stretched from one end of the world to the

other, and the over-all superintendence of world Jewry all heads up into the American Jewish Committee, with its endess ramifications

Jewish-run Purges

A similar review of the Jewish purges in Rumania appears in the same and the succeeding issue (Volume 55) of the American Jewish Year Book. There the Jewess Ana Pauker and a horde of Jewish officials were the center of the purging. A mass deportation was also carried out. The purpose, which was to get those "Jewish looks" away from an infuriated enslaved populace is shown by the provision that, "Those deported... were allowed to choose their new places of residence, provided that they were at least thirty miles from the nearest city" (Vol. 54, p. 356). And: "Many Jewish white-collar workers were dismissed from their jobs and joined the army of deportees. Later, after the fall of Ana Pauker, they were joined by many government officials of Jewish origin, victims of the purge."

In Hungary

The next words are the most significant:

"From the outset, the anti-Jewish campaign was carried on with special zeal by Communist leaders of Jewish descent, such as ex-Premier Mathias Rakosi and the ministers Ernoe Geroe and Joszef Revai" (p. 296).

Today

with millions grabbed from the collectives are being tried and executed. Most of them happen to be JEWS. Quelling the swindling of Jews is represented as causeless "anti-Semitism" and the U.N. and USA are being called upon to stop this cruel treatment. It is true that Kaganovich, former all-powerful head of all Soviet industry, a Jew whose family intermarried with Stalin's is no longer in power. His place has been taken by another Jew by the name of DYMSHITS.

WHO SAYS SOCIALISM IS JEWISH?

It may be seen by the attached photostats that for Jewish eyes Jewry boasts of having invented and run Socialism-Communism from the beginning.

Glance at the top Jewish authorities whose words are produced on pages 26-28 herein.

In (1): "Socialism was originated by Jews and to-day Jews play a leading role in its spread and interpretation". (2) Repeats the same idea. (3) Says the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia: "Jews have been prominently identified with the Socialist movement from its very inception". (4) The Jew Ferdinand Lassalle founded the great German Socialist Party; the Jew Karl Marx wrote "the Bible of modern Socialism", exhibiting his inherited "Talmudical bent." (5) Jews filling Russian universities, made them "hotbeds of socialistic agitation" and revolution. (6) These swarmed to America. (7) trained the Jewish masses, making them "the pedlers of socialism". Election of the first socialist mayor in the USA is cited as "a noble example of the proselytizing work of Russo-Jewish Socialists" (8) Leaders of the Bolshevik Russian Revolution were Jews. (9) The Kerensky Socialist government, and (10) the Bolshevik, alike turned the Jewish masters loose on Russia. (11) "The actual Jewish Socialist movement began in Russia". (12) Zionism adopted Socialism. (13) The unions were founded by Jews. (14) Jewish control over the Socialist (Second) International is evident today. (15) Communist triumph in Russia stimulated Socialism everywhere. (16) Jewish leadership of Red parties in all countries cited. (17) "Scientific socialism originated in the combination of Jewish messianic feeling with German philosophy in Marx and Lassalle."

Check these statements with the photostats from the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943), the Jewish Encyclopedia (1905), the Jewish Publication Society book, "Jewish Contributions to Civilization", the brochure issued by the Union of American Hebrew Congregations with the Central Conference of American Rabbis.

"Jewish Messianic Feeling"

What the Cross means to Christianity, Babylon the Great means to the cult of Pharisaism. That "Hu-

mans" should wish to stable "animals" under Communism is natural. And, that a chief warlord will arise as the "Messiah" of the Pharisees, is part of Talmudic lore. However, the Jews themselves are regarded as the world Messianic force. Note in Sanhedrin 98b (Exhibit 100): "...it will be difficult to remove the Gentiles from their position without inflicting much suffering" (footnote 3) "...The Jews are destined to eat their fill in the days of the Messiah - the years of plenty which the Messiah will usher in will be enjoyed by the Israelies" (footnote 4). The next page (Exhibit 101):

"And thus a MIN" (Christian) "said to Rabbi Abbahu: 'When will the Messiah come?' He replied: 'When darkness covers those people—Alluding to the questioner and his companions" (Christians). Footnote 11: "Thus Israel should hope for the redemption, because it will be a day of light to them: but why should the Gentiles, seeing that for them it will be a day of darkness?"

This is an illustration of calling evil. good, and good, evil. The genealogically nondescript, self-styled "Jews", who adhere to all of the pagan abominations are, Biblically speaking, "Gentiles". Those who love and try to follow the "Holy One of Israel," Christ, are the "congregation of Israel", into which anyone of right spirit may enter (Isa. 56: 1-7; Gal. 3:28-9, etc.).

Babylon the Great

Babylon is the very symbol of moral filth in the whole Old Testament. But those who call themselves "People of the Book" exalt it in every way. Pharisaism today lives by the Babylonian calendar, keeps the Babylonian festivals and Fast of Tammuz, and enshrines its anti-Biblical immorality, including sodomy and burning children to Molech, necromancy, etc.

The Talmud cites as the word of "the Masters" that, "All countries are like dough" (inferior) "toward the Land of Israel, and the Land of Israel is like dough toward Babylon" (See Exhibit 146). Continuing: "We have a tradition that Babel" (Babylon) "will not witness the suffering that will precede the coming of the Messiah", A footnote states that a more correct reading of this is that the suffering" frequent in modern Christian books is fictious. These are the throes of mother Zion which is in labor to bring forth the Messiah—without metaphor the Jewish people" (Exhibit 147).

Continuing, is the Talmudic place to be given the non-Pharisees (called "Canaanites") in this Messianic world of the future. Those buried in Israel will be "resurrected" and the non-Pharisees will have their place as "the people that are like an ass—slaves who are considered the property of the master". The text is divided up with footnotes so as to becloud the

mind of the non-Pharisee possible reader, as the gangster meaning is that all non-Pharisees will be slaves—as the whole Talmud teaches they should be. Anything profitable to the "masters" may be done to the animals or "people that are like an ass"—their burdenbearers. (Exhibit 148).

Where Talmud and Bible Agree

Take Matthew 24 or Mark 13 in which Christ foretells the age we are now in. Luke 21 is also a report of His Olivet discourse. The wars of nation against nation begin the final "sorrows" (Matt. 24:7-8). The persecution of Christians "in all nations" follows; then the Falling Away or apostacy of Christians, which Paul describes as the sign of the finish (IIThes. 2), is also noted by Christ in verse 12. Then comes the "SIGN" of the clean-up when "the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet (shall) stand in the holy place." The "holy place" always refers to the Jerusalem Temple. But there has been no Temple for an Anti-Christ to stand in since, as Christ foretold at the very beginning of this discourse, the Temple was left without "one stone upon another" not "thrown down." Titus dragged a plow over Jerusalem in 70AD. In 1958, a new "Hechal" (temple) Shlomo on the highest hill in Jerusalem was dedicated. Two of the three million dollars cost were donated by a British chain store operator, Isaac Wolfson (Nat. Jewish Post 5/16/58, etc). The building of this temple had been pledged by a delegation of 550 Orthodox synagogues in the USA who visited Israel (London Jewish Chronicle 4/2/54). It is called a "world center of Judaism". Rabbis of the whole world are expected to receive their orders from this Temple establishment.

Christ's Identification Marks

Christ calls this world government "scarlet colored", or RED, as we say. "Israel" is the home of the Red Flag. Articles in the Jewish press have deplored the flamboyant way the Red Flag is flown on red May Day. No wonder. The ruling party MAPAI is a section of the Second International of red parties. Its official songs, printed in my Roosevelt Red Record and Its Background, reproduced from the Socialist song sheet include "The Red Flag", the Soviet "International", with its anti-Christ words:

"We want no condescending saviors to judge us

from a judgment hall,

We workers ask not for their favors; let us consult for all!

'Tis the final conflict, let each stand in his place, the International Soviet (or Party) shall be the human race".

This is sung with upraised clenched fist

MAPAM is Marxist like MAPAI and even more pro Soviet and pro-Russian. The other parties are Marxian splinter parties.

against the God of gods...in his estate shall he honor the god of forces...yet he shall come to his end and none shall help him" (Daniel 11:36, 38, 45).

In the meantime, we must do our part. The RED BABYLONIAN seventh world government will come down, Christ said, "by the blood of the lamb, and by the word of their testimony" who "loved not their lives unto the death" (Rev. 12:11). For "ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free" (John 8:32).

The next great trick of Pharisaism, as now planned, is to bring to trial everyone who dares tell the truth about Pharisaism, under the Genocide Convention. GOOD. May there be those who will overcome by the "word of their testimony" and be able to PROVE that the fountainhead of anti-human genocidal harm to all non-Pharisees is the Talmudic religion.

Those "that do know their God shall be strong and do exploits;" at this time, said Daniel, and shall instruct many and "shine as the stars forever" (Dan. 11:32-3; 12:2).

May you be prepared to overcome by the word of your testimony, and shine as the stars forever.

THE COMMISSION ON
INFORMATION ABOUT JUDAISM

AN ESTIMATE

вү JOSEPH JACOBS

Philadelphia
The Jewish Publication Society of America
5706-1945

value, great. However, even in the industrial world, had there been malice in his heart towards his fellowmen, the freedom of association which such life necessitates would have been impossible. It can not be without its meaning that the Jew has played a leading role in the great modern industrial movements which have an ethical basis. Socialism was originated by Jews; and today Jews play a leading role in its spread and interpretation. And under the leadership of a Jew trades unionism has been brought to its highest point of efficiency and been given an increasing ethical bearing. The Jew has thrown himself into the vortex of modern life with a most commendable zeal, and has contributed in most generous manner his very best to the realization of the ideals of the nation of which he has become a citizen.

JEWISH CONFRIBUTIONS TO CIVILIZATION

probably rest on his connection with Bismarck at the formative period of his career, when the future chancellor was also a member of the Kreuzzeitung party.

Disraeli's career and influence is far better known and need not be further adverted to in this place. The fact that both were converts has little significance from our present point of view, since many of the Jewish leaders on the Liberal side had also adopted Christianity. It is more pertinent to remark that one cannot trace their conservatism to their Judaism, since there was everything in the Jewish position of their time to range Jews on the Liberal side. Stahl and Disraeli are, therefore, to be regarded merely as examples of Jewish ability. There is nothing specifically Jewish in their influence, unless we regard the socialistic strain in Disraeli's conception of "Young England" as a part of the Jewish sympathy with the "under-dog." which can be attributed to their own experiences and to the traditions of the prophets.

Certainly we find a strong Jewish participation throughout the socialistic movement which, from its inception up to the present day, has been largely dominated by Jewish influence. Modern 2)

Jews Not a Race - A World Pharisee Sect

ELIZABETH DILLING

Author of

"The Red Network"
"The Roosevelt Red Record"
"The Octopus"
Box 659, Chicago 90

JESUS CHRIST. THE MOST RABID ANTI-PHARISEE

Since "Jews" were a mixed race from the beginning, the term "Semites" applied to them, admittedly, is silly. "Anti-Semitism", actually; means "Anti-Pharisaism". The Christian who realizes this can well understand the hatred borne for Christ by modern Pharisees. Christ's excoriations of Pharisaism and all that it stands for, in terms of liquid fire, are unequalled by any phillipic in history. One familiar with Matthew 23, John 8:37-44, etc., can realize that the Pharisees were justified in having such a fiery Opponent Crucified, for every doctrine, every aim and ethical ideal He taught, is the exact opposite of every principle of Pharisaic Judaism. As Christ's teachings spread, it is not strange that the Talmud "Sages" came to decree that He deserved not ONE death but FIVE deaths and an eternity in hell. They incorporated this in the Talmud which was declared complete about 500 A.D. in Babylon. Those five deaths are taught in every Talmud-Torah, Yeshiva, and synagogue in the world today.

PHAR15EES

THE UNIVERSAL IEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA

[ 474

the date indicated above, and have continued to be held down to the present day. The name Pharisee, which has come into the English language through the Latin translation of the New Testament and represents the Greek word Pharisaios, goes back directly to the Aramaic word Parisha, the equivalent, in popular speech, of the Hebrew Parush, from the verb parash. The root meaning of the verb is "to separate." The

that the written Torah tended more and more to become obsolete, as the occasions multiplied on which additional directions were needed. Therefore a second theory began to be held, to the effect that along with the written text there was, and always had been from the time of Moses, an unwritten tradition which supplied what was wanting in the written text. Acceptance of the Torah and the obligation to obey it meant therefore acceptance of the Torah written and unwritten, and more particularly the recognition of the Torah as the full revelation made by God, not final as limited to the written text, but always unfolded into greater clearness as the meaning therein contained was gradually

drawn out. The tendency of the older theory was to make Judaism a mere memory of what had once been a living religion. The actual effect of the other theory was to keep Judaism as a living religion. Those who maintained the older theory were the Sadduces: the exponents of the newer theory were the Pharisees.

This explains the true historical importance of the Pharisees. They were the strongest guardians of the re-

practice, in spite of all outward disasters. The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a

Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism

*Rabbinic literature, in all its length and breadth, goes to show that the Jewish religion as interpreted by the Pharisees was continuous with the forms of

Leader of the Harlem flock. Rabbi Matthew in pulpit holds torah during service

The Rev. M. R. Sassoon Ezekiel. a oung Sefardi mohel now in London. Jewish

young Sefardi mohel now in London, has circumcised 2.000 Arabs, mostly children but also some men over the age of 21. He holds the licence of the Health Department of the Israelt Government to circumcise Arab adults and children living in Israel.

Jewish Chronicle, London 3/24/54 The Israel "Moses" less solemn mood Allahlin or Eliproves

fourth Sentenel (Chicago) Marilyn Becomes A Jew

Film Magazine Credits Warmth Of Jewish Family Life With Converting Famous Actress

(From The Jewish Times Of Brookline, Mass.)

New York — Warmth and love of Jewish family life won Marilyn Monroe over to Judaism. Marilyn found love, family unity and intellectual stimulation in the home of the parents of author Arthur Miller.

MARILYN MONROE

STUDIED JUDAISM

Marilyn, according to the Modern Screen magazine, asked Miller that "knowing who you are, being content . . . all comes back to being Jewish, doesn't it?"

It was Marilyn who requested that they be married by a rabbi, though at the time she didn't know that she would have to study Judaism and be converted before a rabbi could marry them. This she readily agreed to do, under the tutelage of Rabbi Robert Goldberg of New Haven,

"Is it of your own free will that you seek admittance into the Jewish fold?" the rabbi asked.

'Yes", Marilyn said.

"Do you renounce your former

She had had none, so she r

"Do you pledge your loyalty to Judaism? Do you promise to east in your lot with the people of Israel amid all circumstances?"

It is good, she remembered, to

. "Yes."

CLOSE BOND

"Do you promise to lead a Jew-ish life?"

She thought of her new family, nolding each other close in a cond of love. "Yes."

Converted To Judaism—These happy and smiling children,

the boys of whom have been circumcized and brought into the Abrahamic Covenant, are growing up as traditional Israelites. Studying Hebrew and adhering strictly to the laws of Kashruth, they are all ardent Zionists. Their parents belong to a world-wide movement known

as United Israel World Union with headquarters a West Olive, Michigan, and Wilbur, West Virginia. More than 11,000 former American Christians are members Not so long ago, David Ben Gurión sent them a letter in which he stated that he and his friends in government would welcome them with open arms should they decide to visit the Holy Land. The Feast of Tabernacles will see many of them living in booths built-out-of-door close to biblical altars which were dedicated with ap propriate ceremonies some time ago. Among the lead ers in the movement is a former Methodist minister and school principal, Rev. James H. Burkey. His four children, who pray daily in Hebrew, are seen in the above picture, two at the extreme left, and two at the right

How to become one of "God's Chosen beoble"?
adopt the Talmud

"Should you be blessed with children do you agree to rear your children according to the lewish faith?"

Her children, who would forever know who they were, who would have an answer to their questions. "Oh, yes," she said.

The Rabbi smiled at her. "Repeat after me," he said, and together they spoke the ancient words of the convert:

"I do herewith declare in the presence of God and the witnesses here assembled that I . . . seek the fellowship of Israel.

"I believe that God is one.

The "one
God" of
Pharisaism "\nis the "EnSof

— the\nun Knowing,\nun Knowable
self-berkind
mass — each
phase run
by individual
"gods" or ke
Metadon
(sungod),
— identical
with he istic
pagian 14:13)
(Tsaiah 14:13)

Flag of their faith. Zionist banner hangs from the prayer house of the San Nicandro community. Some villagers, already in Palestine, have written back glowing reports.

"Prophet of San Nicandro," Story of Italian Converts

stories of all time was recorded indelibly in Jewish history,
10 years ago, when an entire
group of Italians embraced Juda-\nism and settled in Israel. Their
act was the result of a conviction\nin the justice of spiritual teach-\nings of the Old Testament. Their

The remarkable story of this remarkable group of people is told by the man who chanced to meet them before the end of World War "I—Phinn E. Lapide—whose book." "The Prophet of San Nicandro," is one of the most fascinating stories on record. The book, properly subtitled "A Modern Adventure in the Discovery of Faith" (published by Beechhurst Press, 11 E. 36th St.,

NY16), is divided into two patts:
"The Vision," which tells the early
history of the group's discovery
and acceptance of the new faith,
and "The Way to Canaan," their
settlement in Israel where they
now function among the wholesome Jewish settlements.

dian who became an Israeli, left his home at the age of 15 despite his parents' objections, trained in England with Youth Aliyah, was guided by the late Henrietta Szold who made a lasting impression on him and worked in the field of the Palestine Jewish colonies. He perfected his knowledge of Hebrew and Arabic, stood watch agains Arab raiders, later joined the Jewish Brigade and fought in Africa

Brothers Under The Skin

In the little Italian village of San Nicandro, 36 men, women and children who have embraced the Jewish faith, are waiting for the day they can leave for Palestine. They were converted by a wounded veteran of World War I, Donato Manduzio, himself a nan-Jew, who had become convinced that the Jews were God's chosen people. Manduzio died in 1948, but his work is being carried on in San Nicandro by his widow.

Italian
Christians
Turn
"Jewish"—
as the
Asiatic
Khazars
did—in
8th century

with Wavell's Eighth Army. H was wounded in battle and deco rated for bravery. He travele widely in Europe and while is Italy met San Nicandro's nev Jews, becoming their godfather adviser and leader. He knows 1 languages and holds a diploma from the University of Vienna. His at present attached to the Is rael Foreign Office.

THUS, FORTUNATELY, th man who comes on their track was an Israeli who was able t guide them, to direct them to thei destiny.

The story Lapide tells is thrilling from beginning to end. He traces Manduzio's background a a ruffian in his youth. When the future "prophet" of his group returns from the first war cripple

Their discovery by Lapide, afte the Israeli Sergeant Carmi of Ki butz Kinneret, Israel, passed then by thinking that the waving of the flag with a Shield of Davi may have been a trick, was the beginning of fast-moving events. The mass conversion, the whole sale circumcisions—marked an unusual event in all history.

Raphaele Cantoni, who was the first Jew to make official contact with the group, postponed a trict to America "to attend the ceremony of conversion." Dr. Ascareli was to be the Mohel. The arm Chaplain commented: "There had been nothing like it (a mass conversion) since the Khusaro trit became Jews in the eighth cen

"I had single cases once of twice," said Dr. Ascarelli, "bu he never more than two at a time." as

Together with Lapide, "the Chaplain, Cantoni, and Dr. Ascerelli were all present." And the great miracle became an historica fact on that historic day in 1944.

THEN CAME another miracle: A camp was to have been established for survivors from Nazism. There were no supplies. But without advance knowledge the new Jews had gathered enough supplies to make that possible.

And then came another great development: volunteers from the ranks of the new Jews for defense

Keeps faith. This is the widow of Donato Manduzio, founder of a Zionist group in Italy. Since her husband died she is revered as religious leader of converts.

The five volunteers selected their own location for the group's settlement: Ras el Ahmar in Galilee. They sent for the entire group and while the San Nicandra Christians offered them freedom from taxes to remain there, they refused: they were called home to Israei.

THE NATIONAL JEWISH POST

DR. CAMILLE HONIG

Literary Editor

ISRAEL BETWEEN

The Jewish Publication Society of America, under the able editorship of the eminent his-

Dr. Camille Honi

Jewish scientists whose field of inquiry was shamefully neglect-

ed.

Such a book is "Israel Between East and West" by that outstanding anthropologist, folk-lorist and ethnologist Dr. Raphael Patai. Dr. Patai holds two doctorates from the University of Budapest (1933) and from the University of Jerusalem (1936). After years in Israel where he was director of research of the Palestine Institute of Folklore and Ethnology, he came to this country, lectured at various universities, acted as consultant on the Middle East for the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations, and is at present Professor of Middle Eastern Anthropology at Dropsie College and Visiting Lecturer at Princeton University.

His publications in English and in Hebrew (he was editor of the Jerusalem anthropological journal "Edoth") particularly his two volume study in comparative religion: "Man and Earth in Hebrew Custom, Belief and Legend" and "The Science of Man: an Introduction to Anthropology" (Jerusalem, 1947 two volumes) made him an outstanding authority on the Jewish Middle East, the cradle of our and Western civilization.

Dr. Patai's present volume "Israel Between East and West" is a study in human relations in more senses than one. The book is as timely as it is important for anyone who wants to understand one of the most important problems of the young State of

Is There a Jewish Race?

The neglected field of Jewish cultural anthropology, just as of Jewish social and cultural psychology has always fascinated me. Without it it is quite impossible to understand Jewish

Reform Rabbi Quotes Bible Against Scientists

NEW YORK (NJP)—The findings of two Israel scientists that Jews are members of an ancient Mediterranean people of common ancestry was disputed by a Reform rabbi, who quoted the Bible as his authority.

The scientists, Dr. Leo Sachs of the Weizmann Institute, and

SILVER

raeli Institute for Biological Research, told to the International Congress of Human Germetics in Corpenhagen, Denmark, that they used ex-

tensive examination of fingerprints to reach their conclusion. They said that Jews had common genetic factors not found in non-Jews, according to the New York Times.

Rabbi Samuel Silver, editor of American Judaism and director of information of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, told the paper it was of little consequence what Jews were. What matters, he asserted, is what they have accomplished.

Dr. Jacob R. Marcus, of the

Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Cincinnati, also questioned the findings,

MARCUS

"When the
Jews come on
the stage of
history, that is
to say when
we have actual historical\nevidence about
Jews, some-

Half of Israel Jews are COLORED

history or the enigma of Jewish survival

If you studied Jewish types and communities in five continents, as this writer had the opportunity of doing, you would have realized that it is sheer nonsense, and very dangerous fonsense, as well as unscientific to speak about a Jewish race.

And Dr. Patai continues: "Oriental Jews have approximated the physical type of their gentile neighbors in a more narrowly locolized sense. Persian Jews look like Persians, Yemenite Jews look like Persians, Yemenite Jews look like Yemenite Arabs, Bokharan Jews like Bokharan Tajiks and other Turkestan peoples. This means that, whenever in these gentile groups the Alpine and Iranian Plateau elements with their broad-headed and heavier types predominate, the same physical type is found to characterize also the Jews; on the other hand where the Mediteranean type is the more usual one, the same is usual also among the Jews, the Yemenite Jews being the best example of the latter", and he concludes: "The impression is thus gained that the Jews do not belong to a single homogeneous racial group".

The broad division of the Jew-\nish people in three main groups,
the Ashkenazim, Sephardim and
Oriental Jews in Israel and the
cultural and economic problems
the latter constitute in Israel is
the main subject of Dr. Patai's
well documented and extremely\ninteresting book

THE NATIONAL JEWISH POST

Friday, September 14, 1956

SHAMIR: DISCRIMINATION RIFE AGAINST COLORED JEWS

By LEO HEIMAN

HAIFA—Racial discrimination with Jew discriminating against Jew because of the color of his skin is widespread in Israel.

This is the opinion of Moshe Shamir, Israel's most popular young author and playwright.

Writing in Rimmon, Israel' jects the claim that there is no discrimination in Israel because legislation prohibits it and the government is doing all it can to wipe out the evil.

IN SPITE of all efforts aimed at eradicating discrimination, the fact remains that the darker an Israeli's skin, the lower his social and economic status, says Shamir.

Shamir also takes up the contention of those who claim that discrimination will disappear within a few generations.

He points out that white newcomers show little discrimination when they first arrive. They treat their colored brethren, who now number half the Lewish population, as equals. It is only after they become veterans of the country that they adopt the

universal attitude towards the

IT IS THE sabra (born in Israel) white children who retuse to sit together with colored kids at school and discrimination is strongest among the second and third generation Israelis, Shamir contends. The longer one is in Israel, he wrote, the more one is inclined to treat the colored Jews with contempt.

Shamir asserted that special schools had to be established for colored children in the immigrant slums where most of the colored Jews live because the white mothers in the neighboring streets refused to send their children to the same schools.

RABBI SETS OPEN HOUSE

Mexican Indian Jews

Members of congregation begin gathering on Sabbath in front of synagogue in Venta Prieta, one of several small Jewish communities near Mexico City

SINCE THE TIME of Cortez' conquest of Mexico some 400 years ago, in that predominantly Roman Catholic country there have been small communities of Indians who devoutly practice the Jewish religion. Little is known of their origin except that their ancestors were Spanish colonists who clung to Judaism through great persecution. The Indian Jews' long memories of their tribulations and their lack of contact with any but their own people have made them hostile to strangers. Silence, then a slammed door is the usual answer to questions.

The village of Nonoalco, near Mexico City, is less averse than the others to tell of its religious life. Rabbi Licenciado Ramirez, the only one in the community who knows Hebrew, sings the traditional hymns in the synagogue at services. The congregation observes Jewish law—sons are circumcised, only Kosher food is eaten and the Sabbath and all other traditional holidays are ritually celebrated.

Rabbi Salazar reads to the congregation in Spanish. Although it hasn't always been so, today these Indians marry only within their own Jewish communities

SUNDAY NEWS, OCTOBER 6, 1963

European in type. This Nonoalco Jewess' face is Indian

SUNDAY NEWS, OCTOBER 6, 1963

PART I

Indexed COMMENTARY on the Exhibits in Part II These Exhibits are reproductions from:

THE PHARISEES, by Rabbi Louis Finklestein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of New York; one of 120 Jews chosen by the Kehillas (Jewish Communities) of the world in 1937, as the outstanding luminaries of Judaism who were alive in 1936. Exhibits 1-3.

THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD, translated by Michael Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin) in 1903 (Boston); the first English translation of the Talmud, abridged, and without identifying folio numbers; edited by Rabbi ISAAC M. WISE, who introduced "Reform" (in certain details) Judaism into the USA. Exhibits 4-27.

THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD, Soncino, London, English translation (1934-), various books appearing from year to year; the first complete English translation, and with identifying folio numbers, with Foreword by the late Rabbi J. H. HERTZ, Chief Rabbi of Great Britain, another of the 120 Jews chosen as outstanding by world Jewry, 1937.

THE JEWISH COMMUNAL REGISTER of New York City, 1917-1918, Edited and Published by the KEHILLA (Jewish Community) of New York City.

Exhibits 210-242

A Publication of the Department of State, House Document No. 1868: PAPERS RELATING TO THE FOREIGN RELATIONS of the UNITED STATES—1918—(with) RUSSIA (U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington: 1931).

Exhibits 243-261.

THE UNIVERSAL JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA title page, Exhibit 262. This work was copyrighted 1939, 1948, etc.

THE JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA, Funk and Wagnalls Co., N.Y. and London, 1905.

"GLAMOROUS PURIM FORMULA—Exterminate Anti-Semitic Termites As Our Ancestors Did 2,500 Years Ago," by Rabbi Leon Spitz, "American Hebrew," March 1, 1946.

THE RABYLONIAN TALMUD

And GEMARA, or argumentative teachings about these laws.

All Talmud books have MISHNA (plural Mishnaim) Some lack a Gemara.

The Talmud is divided into SIX main divisions called "SEDARIM" (orders) but each division, each volume, is a hodge-podge of every subject imaginable. The main characteristics are: pomp, silliness, obscenity and more obscenity, a setting up of laws seemingly for the purpose of inventing circumventions and shyster-like evasions; delight in sadistic cruelty; reversal of all Biblical moral teachings on theft, murder, sodomy, perjury, treatment of children and parents, etc.; insane hatred of Christ, Christians and every phase of Christianity.

The Six Divisions of the Babylonian Talmud, called "Seder" (plural Sedarim), are:

• a. Berakoth. This book, whose name supposedly means benedictions, is as foul a collection of obscenity as one could find; 405 pages of privy talk, etc.

The following 10 books occupy one 406-page volume in the Soncino edition:

• b. Pe'ah (corner)
• c. Demai (doubtful)
• d. Kil'ayim (mixtures)
• e. Shebi'ith (seventh)
• f. Terumah (heave offerings)
• g. Ma'aseroth (tithes)
• h. Ma'aser Sheni (second tithe)
• i. Hallah (dough)
• i. 'Orlah
• k. Bikkurim (first friuts)

There are 11 books in Zeraim

• 9 SEDER MOED (feetivals).

• a. Sabbath (laws of; endless silly regulations and evasions of)

  • b. Erubin (mingling)
  • c. Pesahim (passover)
  • d Shekalin (shekels)
  • e. Yoma (Yom Kippur)

• f. Sukkah (booths)

• g. Yom Tob (feast day)

• h. Rosh Hashona (New Year)

• i. Ta'anit (fasting)

• i. Megillah (Scroll of Esther, read on Purim)

• k. Moed Katan (half feasts)

• 1. Hagigah (feasting)

The Megillah is a sadistic celebration of drunkenness and bloodlust, the Talmudic admonition being that it is the duty of the Jew to be so drunk on Purim he doesn't know the difference between "Blessed be Mordechai" and "Cursed be Haman." See Exhibit 299.

There are 12 books in MOED.

• 3. SEDER NASHIM (women). This section includes
• a 13-page introduction in the Soncino edition by Rabbi J. H. Hertz. The books are distinguished by sub-sewer filth and obscenity:
• a. Yebamoth (the dead brother's widow) occupies 2 volumes, 871 pages in Soncino edition.
• b. Kethuboth (on the sum due a wife who is divorced) occupies 2 volumes and 728 pages of typical Talmudic sex filth, the baby girl being fair prey for adult men, etc.
• c. Nedarim (vows), 283 pages of silly dirt and immorality illustrative of Christ's denunciations of Pharisee vowings.
• d. Nazir (more vows); 253 pages in Soncino on hairsplitting, immoral junk; Kol Nidre.
• e. Sotah (the suspected woman), 271 pages in Soncino.
  • t. Kiddushin (betrothal)
• g. Gittin (on getting the "Get" or divorce); with time out for such things as placing Christ and all Christians in hell—439 Soncino pages.

There are 7 books in Nashim.

• 4. SEDER NEZIKIN (damages):

• a. Baha Kamma (the first gate): 719 pages of Talmudic ramblings, the general law on damages being that hurting Gentile property is permissible; injuring Jewish property is like assaulting the Divine, for "Jews" only are "men," non-Jews rank as animals. This is "brotherhood."

• b. Baba Mezia (middle gate): 676 pages in Soncino edition of S. O. S. (same old stuff).

• d. Sanhedrin (781 pages): "it forms, along with Makkoth, the chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud;" includes the choicest calumnies of Jesus, His stoning, burning in dung, His decapitation, His strangling in dung, His hanging, or crucifixion for "blaspheming" the Pharisee "sages."

  • e. Makkoth (beatings), 175 pages in Soncino.

• f. Shebuoth (oaths-more vows)-309 pages.

• g. Edunuoth (testimonies)

• h. Abodah Zarah (on treatment of the non-human non-Jew, 366 pages).

  • i. Aboth (savings of the fathers of Talmudism).
  • j. Horayoth (rulings)

There are 10 books in Seder Nezikin.

SEDER KODASHIM (sacrifices):

• a. Zebahim (bloody sacrifices)
• b. Menahot (meal offering)
• e. Hullin (killing)
• d. Bekorot (first born)
• e. 'Arakin (estimation)
• f. Temurah (exchange)
• g. Keritot (extermination)
• h. Me'ilah (trespass)
• i. Tamid (daily offering)
• i. Middot (measures)
• k. Kinnim (birds' nests)

There are 11 books in Kodashim.

SEDER TOHOROTH (cleanness):

• a. NIDDAH (the menstruant woman) is the prize item in this section; it devotes 509 pages to discussing the smell, color and examination by the rabbis of menstruation, without medical or other purpose than groveling in the repulsive; pomp and asininity abound; urinating off of roofs, etc., occupy the Pharisee "sages" in this only book of uncleanness in the section on cleanness which has a Gemara, or argumentative passages. The other 11 books occupy one 589-page volume in the Songino edition:
• • c. Oholoth (tents)
  • d. Nega in (plagues)
  • e. Parah (young cow
  • f. Tohoroth (purification)
• g. Mikwaoth (ritual bath—such as the menstruan woman takes before having intercourse with her hus band, ridding her of the evil eye, etc.).
  • h. Makshirin (kosher, proper)
  • i. Zabim (flux)
  • i. Tebul Yom
• k. Yadayim (hands): the drizzling of water alternately on the hands, to carry off demons, who presumably live in water, a Pharisee custom in Christ's time, is still in force. The "Code of Jewish Law" (Schulchan Aruch). or boiled down Mishna of the Talmud, holds that an evil spirit takes over a sleeping person:

"When he rises from his sleep the evil spirit departs from his entire body excepting from his fingers. From there the unclean spirit does not depart unless he spills water on them three times alternately. One is not permitted to walk four cubits without having his hands washed. (Schulchan Aruch, Vol. 1, Chapter II: Hebrew Pub. Co. 77-9 Delancey St., New York, copyright 1927). Says the Introduction to the Soncino edition of YADAYIM (handwashing):

"This . . . rite . . . formed one of the chief breaches between Jesus and the Pharisees" (p. 545).

1. The last book of Tohoroth is "Ukzin" (stems) There are 12 books in TOHOROTH. The last 11 of these (excepting Niddah) occupy one 589-page volume in the Soncino edition. The 1,098 pages on "cleanness," filled with the foulest obscenities of thought, illuminate Christ's disdain for this hypocrisy and the justification for His attitude.

There are 63 books in the Babylonian Talmud, divided, largely without much point, all being general rubbish baskets, grab bags of disconnected import, into six "orders," divisions, or "sedarim," a foul brew cursed by Christ, Luther, the Popes.

ABODAH ZARAH (Babylonian Talmud book, on non-Jews), title page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

AKIBA: first century Pharisee Talmud "sage" who is credited with doing most to find a Biblical hook on which to hang the Babylonian pagan traditions of the Pharisees. Even Moses was jealous of him (!). He was a master of sorcery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE, AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS, AMERICAN FEDERATION of LABOR, see under JEWISH KEHILLAH.

AMULETS, see under DEMONOLOGY OF THE PHARISEES.

ASSIMILATION of Jews by other nations, see under HADRIAN.

ASTROLOGY, pagan belief in the control by Boss Spirits of the sun, moon and the seven planets, of human life and affairs on this earth. "Baal worship did not play so great a part in the later religion of Judah as did the adoration of the heavenly bodies and related usages borrowed from Assyria and Babylonia"

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exh. 293
The entire Talmud and Cabala (with its Sefer Yetzirah, Sefer Raziel, Zohar books) are built upon astrological beliefs of the ancient pagan world. Only the atheistic Talmudist Maimonides, of all the "sages," opposed astrology, says the Jewish Ency., and that today's Talmudic rules on weddings, in the Schulchan Aruch, and the greeting: "Mazel Tob" (May you have a good constellation) are astrological. This, despite all the Biblical teachings against being an "observer of times" (Deut. 18:10; 4:19, etc.), or pagan. The word "Chaldean" (Babylonian) was synonymous with astrologer and magician (Daniel 2:10, etc.).

Attributing control to and soliciting help from astrological powers violates God's commandment: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." And the whole Old Testament rings with denunciations of the "whorings" and services to such "other gods."

I

BAAL, meaning lord, or master; the god of male procreative powers associated with the Sun in Biblical times, and with a goddess of female procreation, called variously: Venus, Astarte, Mylitta, etc. Mass nudism fornication, sodomy, and mad knife-slashing rites, and burning children, were features of the worship denounced thruout the Bible. Demonism, as in all paganism, was the essence of Baal-worship.

The place of the shrine to Baal, appears in such titles as "Baal-Peor." Some of the repulsive features appear in Sanhedrin 64 a . . . Exhs. 65-6 Yet the Talmud note states that Baal-Peor worship is "nowhere stigmatized as moral depravity, by the Rabbis" (Sanh. 60b footnote, Exh. 61), as affirmed by the Jewish Encyclopedia . . . Exh. 294 The cover-up, that the Rabbis would have so designated it if it had been connected with Gnosticism, and the Talmud text denouncing service of Merculis, is shown up by the fact that the Jews hated Roman gods and customs, and Gnosticism is Talmudic in every way: its immorality, sex ideas, emanations (Cabala), etc. (See under Gnosticism).

BAAL SHEM, meaning "master of the name," the name of God, or Jehova: Y-H-W-H, the skeleton consonants of it being used in 14, 42, 72, etc., weird combinations to summon up the demons. A sorcerer. For Baal Shem Tob, see under HASIDISM.

BABA KAMMA, title page, Exh. 29 BABIES

BABY BOYS: may always be used as subjects for

sodomy by grown men . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Likewise, under "nine years and one day," the "first stage of intercourse" with the mother, or any grown woman, is harmless, Biblically. Shammai (see HIL-LEL) to seem more "strict," lowers the age to eight years in some cases (Sanh. 69b) . . . Exh. 82

A long harangue about the amount of the Kethubah (payment if divorced) a woman gets if her virginity was removed by a young boy, fills Kethuboth 11b.

And the foul mother is reckoned pure, depending on the age of the child. Such degrading use of children was typical of paganism thruout the ancient world.

BABY GIRLS: "When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this—that is, less than three years old—it is as if one puts the finger into the eye—tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years." (Keth, 11b).

Exh. 136

This is the standard doctrine of the whole Talmud on baby girls. Sodomy and intercourse with babies is the prerogative of the adult Talmudic man, in contrast to Christ's beautiful words on little children.

The fictitious age of sexual maturity of baby girls set by the Pharisee "sages," is "three years and one day." This is typical: "A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by coition . . ." (Sanh. 55b; Sanh. 69a-69b; Yebamoth 57b-58a; Yeb 60b . . . Exhs. 55, 81, 156, 159, etc. But, in the case of a baby girl who is not Jewish-born, a "proselyte," she may be "married" thus by a grown priest: "A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest;" altho "one who is fit for cohabitation," as stated on the same page, is "one who has attained the age of three years and one day" (Yeb. 60b), Exh.159. There is nothing worse in degrading Hindu child-marriages than this.

This Yebamoth passage continues with the ruling on the case of a baby under three married to a grown man priest, and declared eligible to continue as his wife—Exh. 160... This baby girl was a "proselyte," of course, so age did not matter. But "under eleven years and one day" a little girl "carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner" (Yeb. 12b). Exh. 152

BARYLO?

Pharisaic Babylonian Talmudism, as Chief Rabbi Hertz put it, from 586 B.C. to 1040 A.D., when the last of the Talmud "academies" moved out into Europe, Asia and Africa from Babylonia . Exh. 33-34 The "glory" of Babylon, the Talmud (Rodkinson) . . . . . . . . . . . Exh. 18 And from Babylon, to Africa, Europe and all over the world. Pharisaism and its Traditions (Talmud)

And from Babylon, to Africa, Europe and all over the world, Pharisaism and its Traditions (Talmud) went, so that the Jew today repeats Pharisaic arguments when he studies Talmud, says Rabbi Louis Finklestein, one of Jewry's world top Jews . Exh. 2

Babylon, First, Now as Always

From Talmud "academies" at Sura, Nehardea, Nisibis, Pumbeditha, Talmudic ideas and decisions went out and were accepted by the "Jews" of the world. The Jewish Ency., considering "the general influence of Babylonia upon European Judaism," states: "The West received both the written and the oral Law from Babylonia," and even after the close of the Talmudic "glories" in Babylon (1040 A.D.): "Babylonia, however still continued to be regarded with reverence by the Jews in all parts... in the ninth century... Jews of Abyssinia placed 'the sages of Babylon' first in their prayers... a similar prayer, altho it has quite lost its application, is extant today in many congregations. Rabbi Paltiel of Cairo contributed one thousand gold pieces to the schools of Babylonia... in accordance... with a custom prevalent in all places where Jews dwelt.... Toward the end of the twelfth century... Benjamin of Tudela... relates that the 'nasi' of Damascus received his ordination from the academic head of Babylonia so that this country was still predominant in the minds of the Jews of the Moslem world" (Jewish Ency. "Babylonia" Exhs. 295-6).

NASI (prince), the head of the Sanhedrin, ruler of temporal affairs of Jewry; the Ab Beth Din, being the religious head and the joint ruler with the Nasi of Jewish affairs, in Pharisaism. There were five of these "pairs" before 70 A.D., famous ones.

A Babylonian Talmud passage on Babylon, exalts it as the "centre of religion and learning" (Kethuboth 111a, Exh. 146). Like the ruling pairs (zugot) of the Pharisees, Shammai and Hillel at the time of Christ and King Herod being the fifth of these, is the status of Israel and Babylon. The latter is the spiritual head, Israel is the future place of messianic world rule. Jews have gone to die in Israel to save themselves the pain of rolling thru cavities to get to Israel when their rule

The non-Jew, here called "Canaanite," is given the place of an ass in this messianic world. A Biblical verse about Abraham going up to pray and telling his young men to "Abide ye here with the ass," and he would return to them (Gen. 22:5) is dragged in for the purpose of saying that the correct interpretation of this verse is that non-Jews are "PEOPLE THAT ARE LIKE AN ASS—SLAVES WHO ARE CONSIDERED the PROPERTY of the MASTER." Exh. 148

For the superiority of the BABYLONIAN TALMUD to the Bible, see TALMUD.

For the curses upon adherers to the Bible, instead of Talmud, see BIBLE.

Banks and Bankers

For role of, in fomenting the Red Russian Revolution of Jewry, see STATE DEPARTMENT PUBLI-CATION.

Ben-Gurion, David

See under JEWISH KEHILLA (Communal Register), under POALE-ZION.

Bestiality

Altho Moses ordered that if a woman have intercourse with a beast both should be killed (Leviticus 20:16), and that a priest must not marry a harlot or woman who is profane (Lev. 21:7), the Talmud teaches that "unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a High Priest," since then "you will find no woman eligible. . . ." (Yeb. 59a-59b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

sweeping the floor, she is likewise reckoned to be pure, not profane. For, "The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not regard such an intercourse either."

This gives a fair idea of the systematic deformation of Scripture by the Pharisees and of Christ's denunciations about their making God's commandments of none effect by their Tradition (Matt. 15:6).

BIBLE versus Oral Law (Talmud)

Stealing for themselves the title of "Israelites," the Talmud "sages" teach that "God made a covenant with Israel only for the sake of that which was transmitted orally". And the Biblical "basis" of this is given as Exodus 34:27. BUT this verse states, instead: "And the Lord said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel"—the opposite! (Gittin 60b, Exh. 204). The Talmudic reversal of Moses' written words are said to have been transmitted "orally", and thru Moses himself—believe it or not!

Bearing in mind that the Scribes were the Pharisee teachers of the Law of Moses (carefully distorted) whose teachings comprise the Talmud, note: "There is greater stringency in respect to the teachings of the Scribes than in respect to the Torah... so that a Biblical law may be transgressed", the Torah in its narrow sense being the Old Testament, still narrower the first five books (Pentateuch) of Moses, but in its wider use it means the Torah as misinterpreted by the Pharisaic Talmud. See Sanhedrin 88b, Exh. 95. Always the Talmud ranks above the Bible in every way.

Not reproduced is the passage from Nedarim (vows) of which Exh. 170 is the title page. On page 107 of the Soncino edition is this: "As will be seen on 37a Scripture was generally regarded as the study of children only, adults usually investigating the deeper meaning. From this we see that it was usual to teach the Bible to girls, in spite of the Talmudic deduction that daughters need not be educated (Kid 30a.) The opposition of Rabbi Eliezer to teaching the Torah to one's daughter (Sotah 20a: He who teaches his daughter Torah is as though he taughter

her lewdness) was probably directed against the teaching of the ORAL LAW, and the higher branches of study (V. Maimonides Yad. Talmud Torah)... The context shows that the reference is to the higher knowledge of Biblical law.

BIBLE Used for Obscenity

Typical of the misuse of the Bible for purposes of inventing obscenity and then giving it a Biblical coating, is the following. SISERA, head of the Canaanite army, fights all day and is the only man left alive. He flees to the tent of a supposed friend of the Canaanites, Heber the Kenite. Jael, Heber's wife, welcomes him in but as soon as he falls into exhausted sleep drives a tent nail thru his temple and he dies. She boasts of this to his pursuing captors. Next, Deborah makes up a song of rejoicing in which she embroiders on Sisera's actual death in his sleep (Judges 4:21) and with poetic license sings: "when she had stricken through his temples—at her feet he bowed, he fell, he lay down: at her feet he bowed, he fell where he bowed, there he fell down dead" (Judges 5:27). The verbs "bowed" and "fell" are used three times each, and "lay" is used once. This makes seven verbs used in this verse. The standard use of this verse is to indicate "seven sexual connections". It is used thus about Christ. The words: "at her feet he bowed, he fell" are explained as: "Judges 5:27. This is taken to refer to sexual intercourse . . ." (Sanhedrin 105a-b, Exh. 108).

This is rehashed in Yebamoth 103a-103b; "That profligate—Sisera—had seven sexual connections on that day for it is said, 'Between her feet he sunk, he fell, he lay: at her feet he sunk, he fell; where he sunk, there he fell down dead", with the footnote explaining the Talmudic reasoning: "Each of the expressions he sunk', and he fell', occurs three times, and he lay occurs once" (Exh. 162).

The Talmud book of Nazir rehashes the same for no reason whatever: "That wicked wretch, Sisera, had sevenfold intercourse with Jael at that time, as it says, 'At her feet he sunk, he fell, he lay,' etc.—The words he sunk', 'he fell' occur three times, and the words he lay once. Judges V, 27" (Nazir 23b, Exh. 165).

Note that the book of Horayoth repeats the same asinine obscenity (13a-13b, Exh. 196). To use the agonized convulsions of a dying man, thus, is Pharisaic "wisdom".

Torah Means Talmud, as a Rule

The word 'Torah' does not refer to the Bible in Sanhedrin 59a—see Exh. 60: "A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death, for it is written, Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs". Reference is then made to the "No-

achian laws" which the non-Jew may study "but not laws which do not pertain to them". Also:".. (the) objection was to the studying of the Oral Law... Rabbi Johanan feared the knowledge of Gentiles in matters of Jurisprudence, as they would use it against the Jews in their opponents' courts". In other words, since all Talmud laws discriminate against the non-Jew and rank him as an animal, knowledge of this was dangerous. The Jewish Encyclopedia is still more open about Sanhedrin 59a, above, threatening death to any Jew who revealed the "Torah" laws to Gentiles "for such knowledge might have operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts." This follows a dissertation on the laws on cheating and getting the best of Gentiles in trade and in court ("Gentile", Exh. 271, Left column). "Noachim" is just another name for non-Jews, using this double-talk to deceive the reader.

Asinine Use of Bible by Talmud

One is enlightened as to Christ's denunciations of the Pharisees as "fools and blind" (Matt. 23, etc.) by the following so-called "wisdom of the sages":

ADAM: Adam's words about Eve are cited: "And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh...", a statement Christ used in His teaching about marriage (Matt. 19:3-6). But the Talmud teaches:

"I am weary with my groaning; all the night make I my bed to swim; I water my couch with my tears". Citing the above verse, Psalm 6:7, the "sages" make this to be the meaning: "Even during David's illness he fulfilled the conjugal rights of his eighteen wives, as it is written, 'I am weary with my groaning: all the night make I my bed to swim; I water my couch with my tears" (Sanhedrin 107a, Exh. 116).

WOMEN who are "unclean" (menstruating) are to

remain separate, says Moses, "all the days of her issue", and this verse (Leviticus 15:26) is cited, but the sages hold "that a woman is not regarded as a 'zabah' "(one with a discharge) "except during the day time because it is written, 'all the days of her issue'—Emphasis being laid on days" (Horayoth 4a, Exh. 194).

HARLOTS and DOGS: The creative powers were worshipped in all ancient pagan countries as the procreative powers of male and female with sex rites to match. Men who became priests to the female goddess Venus, Mylitta, Astarte, or by whatever name, in a wild orgy of drugged frenzy would castrate themselves with "sacred swords" and then contribute part of their earnings as sodomists to the upkeep of the pagan cult and temple, and would train and sell and rent dogs for immoral purposes. Girls who became priestesses to the pagan temples earned their keep and contributed to the cult's upkeep thru their earnings as "sacred prostitutes". But Moses taught that the worship of GOD was not to be maintained on such earnings. The Talmud cities Deuteronomy 23:19 (but in our Bibles it is verse 18):

"Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog, into the house of the Lord thy God for any vow: for even both of these are abomination unto the Lord thy God". Then the Talmud makes this out of that ruling: "there is not adultery in connection with an animal, Because it is written, 'Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog', etc. and it has been taught: 'The hire of a dog and the wages of a harlot' are permissible, as it is said, 'Even both of these are an abomination unto the Lord'—the two specified in the text are abominations but not four". Then the permission is given to use for the temple: "Money given by a man to a harlot to associate with his dog. Such an association is not legal adultery. If a man had a female slave who was a harlot and he exchanged her for an animal, it could be offered" (Sotah 26b, Exh. 168).

Abodah Zarah takes up this same "matter of a harlot's hire which is permitted—To be devoted to the Temple, in spite of the Law of Deut. XXIII, 19" (18). The man is permitted to do this: "If he gave her it" (the money) "and subsequently had intercourse with her, or had intercourse with her and subsequently gave it to her, the hire is permitted—The two matters are regarded as separate and what she received is legally a gift". This shyster argument goes on for two pages (Abodah Zarah 62b-63a, Exhs. 190-191).

No wonder that Christ charged that the Pharisees nullified the commandments of God by their Tradition, which in written form is the Talmud. For similar nullification see PARENTS, GENTILES, BLASPHEMY, SORCERY, MURDER, INCEST, PERJURY, THEFT,

SODOMY, MARRIAGE, CHRISTIANS, etc., herein,

Two Hairs (Exh. 153)

The asinine harangue in Yebamoth 12b-13a about two hairs proving puberty, or not proving it, as the child may have lost the two hairs thru childbirth(!), and the calling for an examination by the rabbis, refers in Soncino edition, to three similar messes of junk and muck in Kethuboth 36a, Baba Bathra 156a and Niddah 52a. To be unable to tell whether a little girl is as yet adolescent, or has borne a child or not, by counting two hairs, is too dumb to credit to anything except the love of sub-sewer subjects—"the reprobate mind", as Paul called it, "Who changed the truth of God into a lie" (Romans 1:25, 28). To deal in unnatural filth and sex matters is the core of Talmudic "scholarship."

Down With Agriculture

In the course of that terrible prophecy against Tyre, the New York of the ancient world, reprobate with sodomy, lesbianism, child-burning abominations, is the verse foretelling that "all that handle the oar, the mariners, and all the pilots of the sea, shall come down from their ships; they shall stand upon the land" (Ezek. 27:29). (The prophecy, all the details of the preceding chapter were literally fulfilled by Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander the Great. Nebuchadnezzar pounded down the walls and Alexander made a causeway of the rocks, killing and selling into slavery the inhabitants who had taken refuge on an island off shore.) However, the Talmud uses it thus.

"No occupation is inferior to that of agricultural labour, for it is said, 'they shall come down'—emphasis on "down" (Yeb.63a., Exh. 161).

Pomp and Privy (Exhs. 196-8)

The assumptions of wisdom in regard to remedies are the most asinine poses of the Pharisee "sages", but no pompous dissertation is complete without the privy element. The son of a "scholar", we read, that is the son of one who can discuss each filthy morsel in the Talmud, may "enter and sit down before their father, with their backs to the people" (if they understand the Talmudic jabber). "When, however, they do not possess the capability of understanding the discourses they enter and sit down before their father with their faces towards the public. . . . if he went out to ease himself he may re-enter and sit down in his place . . . This

applies only to the minor functions of the body but not to the major functions since he should have examined himself before . . . A man should always make a habit of easing himself early in the morning and late in the evening in order that there be no need for him to go far . . ." And so on, thus illustrating Christ's excoriations of the Pharisees as: "full of all uncleanness"; their love of the "uppermost rooms at feasts . . . all their works they do for to be seen of men"—"full of hypocrisy and iniquity" (Matthew 23:5-6, 27-8, etc.).

The Pharisee "sages" then dispute whether dipping one or two fingers in salt makes one wise; whether passing under the bit of a camel, or under the camel itself, interferes most with mentality, then back to the pomp about the head of the Sanhedrin, the "Nasi", and the vice-president or head of a Talmud school, the "Ab-Beth Din", and how many rows have to rise when each one enters to honor him (Exh. 197).

Dates and Beds (Exh. 132-3)

They harangue about dates: "they remove three things: evil thoughts, stress of the bowels, and abdominal trouble". This leads to a play on words, door, ladder and bed, where "one is fruitful and multiplies on it"—back to the old subjects. This is Kethuboth 10b-11a (Exh. 133). On this same page is the Mishnah (law) that a baby girl under three years and one day is always reckoned as a virgin: "If they had intercourse before they were three years and one day old the hymen would grow". Which last is a Satanic violation of all nature and decency and sense. "Fools", as Christ called them, is a mild but accurate designation of such teachers.

Gertrude Stein Stuff, (Exh. 154)

If you have staggered thru the "nothing mumbles but bricks is relishing, a dishpail, a skylark and red, red wine", the "a rose is a rose is a rose", stuff, the Talmudic Gertrude Stein made Christians pay huge sums to be hypnotized into thinking was "art", you will see the fountainhead of this twaddle of nonsense in the Talmud, in Yebamouth 14a (Exh. 154). They did, they did not, they did, they did not, they did", act in accordance with their views". Just let go and go crazy and imagine you paid \$250 to hear this prattled, as the University of Chicago did, when Gertie, in dirty sweat-

er and with dirty fingernails, appeared as their speaker when she was here a few years back.

The funny thing about the horrendous and silly remedies of the Talmud book of Gittin, with their mixtures of dung and blood and filth, is not the asininity of the remedies themselves so much as the commentary, in English, by a British doctor with a string of alleged degrees, which appears in the Soncino edition of this book. He attempts to justify and praise these nutty things! The wrong people, it is often said, are in asylums. A Talmud "scholar" must have all the characteristics, it would seem.

Exh. 199 is the title page of Gittin, the translation being dated 1936. Exhs. 205-209 are reproductions of 69a-70b devoted to dung and dog remedies too fantastic to believe. The privy and the demons and the privates are mingled in insane array. But the "Appendix" (not reproduced) is entitled: "Notes On the Various Remedies Recommended in Folios 68b-70b", By W. M. Feldman, MD, FRCP, Lond., FRAS, FRS".

For the "Charms, Amulets, Incantations, Astrological associations", he finds the benefits of "suggestion" with "profound effect", and for whatever he cannot find a "rational physical basis", he invents imagined benefits. He points out that "animal excrements as remedial agents" are ancient and we "shall not lightly dismiss the ancient folk-remedies—however absurd they may appear". He extolls the incantations and drools over these Rabbis' "knowledge of all parts of theoretical and practical medicine, in which they... surpassed their contemporaries..." He refers to several works to study the glories of "Talmudic Medecine" as his closing shot in five pages of whitewash, and professes to look down upon "the probable sneers of the sophisticated, but untutored reader"—which should hold you and your common sense in leash!

BIBLE ADHERENTS

The supreme hatred of Talmudic Judaism is reserved for and directed against the hated "adherers to the text" of Scripture who are, thus, accused of spurning the words of the Pharisee "Sages", as enshrined in the Babylonian Talmud.

Sadduccees

The Sadducees were the first of these enemies. They were the constant opponents of the Pharisees and their

imported Babylonian paganism, which they misrepresented as the Tradition of the Elders, the "Oral Law" transmitted privately to Moses and on down the line, superceding anything written in the Bible. In the six years of civil war between them and Alexander Jannaeus, King and High Priest of Jerusalem, 50,000 were killed on both sides before this Sadducean ruler succumbed and his widow Salome turned affairs over to the Pharisees in 79 BC. Her brother, Simon ben Shetah, had been waiting for such an opportunity. The continued civil war resulted in the sons of Alexander, Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, both going hat in hand to Pompey, Caesar's Roman general in Syria, in 63 BC, and asking him to invade Palestine and slaughter their respective opponents. This is how Rome happened to be in power when Christ was born, Only after Christ's Ascension did the Pharisees triumph.

The Samaritans, whom Our Lord seemed to favor, had been brought in from Cutha and other far places in the world Assyrian empire, to take the place of the ten Israel tribes they had deported in 721 BC. They had adopted Biblical Judaism and opposed the return from Babylon of the Pharisee-run horde in 536 BC. Each year the American Jewish columnist, Rabbi Alstat, contemptuously refers to the handful of Samaritans who yearly celebrate Passover on the site of their former temple at Mt. Gerizim. The Talmud refers to adherers of the Bible scathingly as "Samaritans" and "Cutheans", and these words are used to designate Christians as similar trash.

The Karaites arose in the 8th century in Babylonia to plague the Pharisee top element by scorning Talmud and holding up the Bible as authority. The molten stream of hatred, therefore, was turned on them. But, when the few remaining thousands of Karaites were favored by the Czar of Russia, altho they are classed as untouchables by Talmudists, the latter offered to join the Karaites to get immunity from Czarist displeasure—but the Karaites turned the hypocrites down.

The Christian is planted for eternity, therefore, in hell under a deluge of "boiling excrement", the stock punishment:

"WHOEVER MOCKS THE WORDS OF THE SAGES IS PUNISHED WITH BOILING HOT EXCREMENT" (Gittin 57a). See Exh. 202. On this same page where the ordinary Christian is getting this eternal fate, Christ is being similarly punished in hell with

"boiling semen", forever.

Exhibits 16, 24-5-6 are reproductions from the History of the Talmud which is one of the ten volumes of the "Rodkinson" translation of the Babylonian Talmud (1903). His real name as a Russian Jew was M. Levi Frumkin, and altho he deleted much much filth, and used no identifying folio numbers, Jewry was irate at him for translating any of the book which had illegalized Jews again and again. He quotes from the Talmud.

"If a man goes out from the study of the Mishna" Talmud law) "to read the verses of the Bible, this nan can have no more peace" (Exh. 24).

BLASPHEMY

Not content with consistent reviling or blasphemy of God's Word, this shysterism is taught concerning blaspheming the Divine Name: "blasphemy is an indictable offense only if it is mentally directed against God... If, however, one reviles the Divine Name, whilst mentally employing it to denote some other object, he is not punished! (Sanhedrin 65 a-b, Exh. 70). The Jewnited Nations employs this same double talk.

Like the Statute of the International Court of the United Nations, which permits one, three, any number of judges, secretly, without defense, juries, or precedent, to try a victim and give him "summary punishment", the above ruling, leaving the guilt safely in the hands of the rabbinical judge as to what was going on in someone's mind, keeps the dictatorship over the flock secure—to loose or to bind.

BLOOD AND INTERCOURSE

The bloody, the sadistic, and the obscene, are the darlings of the "synagogue of Satan" mentality. The appetite is never sated. Therefore eight running pages of just one discourse have been reproduced on the favorite subject of blood and intercourse. This concerns whether or not the first intercourse on the Sabbath would constitute "labor" on the Sabbath. Is it performed to see if she was a virgin, etc., etc., is discussed. But the rule which governs is the dominant rule of the Sabbath on the subject of labor. An act of INJURY never ranks as labor. So, if the intent is to injure the wife the act is permissible (Exh. 122, Kethuboth 5b-6a).

The eighth page ends with the thought that it is permitted anyway. Then a new line of "religious" discussion about women and blood starts in—senseless, needless, and due only to a love of the sub-sewer for its own sake. These longwinded, silly pages of Pharisee "wisdom" are but a sample of the preoccupation of the whole Talmud (Exhs. 121-141).

The Wife and By Trades

Kethuboth 51b, Exh. 142, which follows, presents the proposition that a wife who is attacked may grow acquiescent—unless she has witnesses who testify "that she cried from the commencement to the end". But this is then modified to excuse the wife who does not keep on protesting on the ground that she is the victim of her own passions and therefore okay anyway (Exh 143).

The Mishnah which follows (Keth. 61b, Exh. 145), which ranks above all Biblical rules and teachings, doles out by trades the proper number of relations between husband and wife: "men of independence every day", down to "sailors, once in six months". Talmud rules are seemingly set up to be broken by shysterism, with judgment left in the hands of a dictator—formerly the Rabbi.

BOOK BURNING

Talmudists keep up a continual propaganda that burning anti-Christian, immoral or subversive books is the depth of bigotry, bias, intolerance, etc. But the teaching in Sabbath 111a is even cited in the Jewish Encyclopedia, under "Gentiles", which holds that Christian books should be burned "without regard to the name of God appearing therein" (See Exh. 273, right hand column). But that is "different"!

BROTHERHOOD in JUDAISM

For "Brotherhood", see "Gentiles". Not only is the non-Jew, or "Gentile", not a brother, he is not even a human being, and has no human rights under any legal code, Mosaic or otherwise. He ranks as a chicken, pig or cow, "slaves who are considered the property of the master".

CABALA, (Exhs. 285-92)

The Cabala is the bone and blood of Talmudic Judaism, which is pagan from start to finish. It uses the "whited sepulchre" of the Old Testament to cover its negation of every moral law in the Old Testament as it practices all the occult demonistic abominations excoriated by the Old Testament.

The Cabala has two aspects: theoretical and practical, or "theurgic" (wonderworking). The "God" of the Cabala is "the En Sof", the unknowing and unknowable sea of mind or matter out of which creation perks. "The doctrine of the En Sof", says the Jewish Encyclopedia, is the starting point of all cabalistic specualations. "God is the infinite, unlimited being, to whom one neither can nor may attribute any attributes whatever" (p. 472, "Cabala"). And Maimonides, pillar of Talmudism in the middle ages, "contributed to the

cabalistic doctrine of the En Sof by his teaching that no attributes could be ascribed to God unless it be of Pythagorean origin" (same, p. 465). And Pythagoras was the pagan sorcerer who set up a dictatorship along Iron Curtain lines, who attributed creative powers to letters and numbers, as does the Cabala.

The "Ten Intelligences" of pagan Aristotle, that is the Sun, Moon and seven planets each ruled by a Boss Spirit who dominates affairs of the universe in accordance with the complicated astrological time charts, is paralleled by the "Ten Sephirot" of the theoretical Cabala. Three triads, the male and female spawners and their offspring, plus the overall or En Sof, form a design representing every condition of life, every quality, from soup to nuts. Sex is the glorifying king and queen. The soul transmigrates around the lot, back into the unknowing and unknowable source, the En Sof, into a sort of Nirvana knownothingness, like Hinduism.

"Jewish mystics described the highest degree of love of man for God in sensuous forms in terms taken from marital life" (p. 465). "Closely connected... is the doctrine of the transmigration of the soul on which the Cabala lays great stress" (p. 476).

There are "ten classes of angels with their chiefs presided over by Metatron who was changed into fire" (p. 475). Metatron is the Boss Spirit of this universe and the Big Shot of Talmudic Judaism and admittedly linked to the Sun God, called by another sect, "Mithra".

Theoretical Cabala

Two qualities dominate the theoretical Cabala. Every attribute of Intelligence, of Knowing, Loving or Ruling is stripped from the God of the Bible and handed over to pagan spirits, who are invoked as in ancient paganism as the "other gods" denounced by the Prophets. This act of stripping God of Intelligence and reducing Him to a mass of self-perking essence, the En Sof, is, admittedly, pantheism (the sum of nature being God, without any Chief Engineer). And, whether called "emanation" by the Cabala, "immanence" by Talmudic Spinoza, or renamed by Hegel—for "the real and ideal is taught in the same way in the Cabala as in Hegel" (p. 474), or "dialectical materialism" by Karl Marx, it is the same old atheistic concept of nature just waiting for MAN to run it and push it around. The Luciferian god is always MAN.

The great heresy of Gnosticism, which nearly swept Christianity from the earth in the early centuries, is admittedly Cabalistic. And the Gnostic and Cabalistic idea that evil is non-existent is currently revived in "Christian Science", which is neither Christian nor scientific, and is a magnet for hundreds of thousands of Jews who claim, as the Universal Jewish Ency.

states, that they can be Christian Scientists without deserting their Talmudism ("Christian Science"). The Jewish Ency. quoted above, states: "As the divine has true being, evil is that which has no being, the unreal or seeming thing as it appears" (p. 477). The Universal Jewish Ency. says: "Evil, according to the Cabalistic philosophy, is nonexistent, anticipating Christian Science; . . . " (p. 620).

Practical Cabala

Every pagan trick of dethroning God and enthroning individual spirits is employed by the Cabalists. "Casting of Lots, Necromancy, Exorcism. . . Bibliomancy, and the mysticism of numbers and letters were developed into complete systems. Hence the cabalistic doctrine of the heavenly alphabet, whose signs are the constellations and the stars. Thus ASTROLOGY was legitimized, and bibliomancy found its justification in the assumption that the sacred Hebrew letters are not merely signs for things, but implements of divine powers by means of which nature may be subjugated" (by Man), says the Jewish Ency. ("Cabala", p. 479).

But the bloody business of making circles to circumscribe the spirits, of gouging out cocks' eyes, skinning lambs and throwing the blood around to weird incantations to bring up the spectres of the departed, as forbidden by Scripture, is hidden as an "esoteric" or secret lore entrusted to the Baal Shems, etc. HASSIDISM (also spelled Chassidism) specializes on Cabala. About half of all Jews were Cabalists at the end of the 19th century, we are told. Copied from hand to hand, cabalistic manuscripts, nevertheless, reach museums. One enlightening book on these is by a Cambridge professor, E. M. Butler, "Ritual Magic" (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1949).

The vast scholarship, the documentation on this subject, are presented in a light hearted style not unmixed with awareness of the perils, the ghastly viciousness of the occult "arts" which translations of the museum manuscripts must convey to any sane reader. Christ refers to the world red power rising over the seventh and last world government as "BABYLON the GREAT, the MOTHER OF HARLOTS and ABOMINATIONS of the EARTH" (Rev. 17). So reference is made to a branch of this demon magic in the Butler book as belonging to a much earlier age: to the world of the Akkadian-Chaldean "(Babylonian)" inscriptions and of the Graeco-Egyptian papyri animated by the belief that the gods could and would support the magician in his dealings with the demons if properly invoked; and that by the use of certain mysterious and ineffable names as well as other spells, they could be forced to do so even against their will. From the earliest times this extraordinary power was recognized as prone to abuse in the

hands of 'black' magicians, but the Art itself was not only respectable, it was a high and holy one. Christianity altered all that, anathematizing magic. . ." (p. 209).

Tetragrammaton

The skeleton letters of Jehova: Y-H-W-H-, called the Tetragrammaton, is the "ineffable word" in Talmudic Judaism, being used in weird combinations to evoke the demons. Its use is restricted to the inner circle of Rabbinical potentates.

Rabbi Joshua Trachtenberg, who is listed in Who's Who in America and Who's Who in American Jewry (1938-9), in his defensive yet illuminating book, "Jewish Magic and Superstition" (Behrmann's, N. Y., 1939), writing of the age long reputation of Jews as practitioners of black magic and all occult demonistic rites, states:

"The sources indicate that Jews were at least acquainted with methods of inducing disease and death, of arousing and killing passion, of forcing people to do their bidding, of employing demons for divinatory and other purposes. . . We find accounts of the magician's power to project his soul to far-distant places, there to perform an errand, and then return to his comatose body" (p. 13).

There is no kind or breed of occultism which is not included beneath the whited sepulchre of Pharlsaic Talmudic Judaism, and which does not appear in the Talmud and its Cabala. ALWAYS, power is ascribed to spirits, and MAN is the creator and chief engineer depending upon his mumbo-jumbo "knowledge", hence the word "GNOSIS", meaning higher knowledge.

ABRACADABRA, herein, see Exh. 281

AMULETS and CABALA, see Exh. 285

AMULETS, pictures of see Exh. 287

BEZALEL, whose occult knowledge put Moses to shame, says the Talmud, Exh. 288

CABALA, Babylonian, secret, see Exh. 288

GNOSTICISM, Jewish, and based on Babylonian magic, Exh. 288

Continued to Exh. 292 LETTERS CREATE the World, Exh. 288

MOGEN DAVID (6-pointed star), used by the Cabala, Exh. 282, and for amulets, Exh. 287

SHABRIRI, see Exh. 282

SOLOMON'S SEAL (5-pointed star), see Exh. 282

The Ma'aseh Mercabah and Ma'aseh Bereshit are called the very basis of this occult gnosticism. Pretending to be based upon Genesis (Creation) and Ezekiel's chariot throne of God vision (Eze. I), this last "mystery" is called "MERKABAH."

The words "by other means" are the most significant in the definition of the Merkabah in the Jewish Ency:

Pharisaic Mercahah

The Christian need not wallow in darkness. In the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia it was already clearly written down that the Pharisees took over "Judaism", removed all "obnoxious verbiage" concerning God, such as attributing to Him Intelligence and control over this world and bestowed all Biblical powers ascribed to Him to lesser spirits, or "angelic powers"—which is pure paganism. And, with the Angelology and Demonology (of Babylon) and the Ma'aseh Bereshit and Ma'aseh MERKABAH, they amplified the Bible (into pantheism). Anthropmorphism, or attributing to God any human quality like Intelligence, Love, or Control, such as God gave man over the animal world, was "obnoxious" to the Pharisee. See "Pharisee" reproduction, upper left column, Exh. 264, from Jewish Ency. See also DEMONOLOGY of the PHARISEES below.

Even burning children to the demon Molech for black occult power is allowed TODAY by the supreme scriptures of Pharisaic Judaism. See Exhs. 66-9, also "Molech", herein.

DEMONOLOGY of the PHARISEES

All forms of demonology were adopted by the Pharisees and incorporated into the "synagogue of Satan" when they took over Judaism. Demons of the privy, of the night, of every phase of nature, were and are catered to by the tenets and customs of this sect. The Talmud book of Yadayim (hands) is on ritual handwashing in connection with Pharisee demonology. The Talmud is larded with occult works and practices.

Despite Moses' orders: "There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass thru the fire" (See Molech, herein) "or that useth divination, or an observer of times" (astrology) "or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee" (Deuteronomy 18:10-12)—yet all of these are permitted by Pharisee scripture. Note Sanh. 65a-b, Exhs. 70, 71.

Quoting this very Scriptural passage, the "sages' hold that calling up demons to aid with sorcery is not

idolatry since demons are not thereby worshipped!

The ancient practice of spirits speaking from the privates by soothsaying is dwelt upon and this practice is attributed to Jesus ("He practiced enchantment by means of his membrum" in Sanh. 105a-b, Exh. 108).

MAN the Creator

The claim is made that "Rabbah created a man" Sanh. 65b, Exh. 72) and this is followed by a long footnote on the use of the "Sefer" (book) "Yezirah", the Book of Creation, a part of the Cabalistic lore of Talmudism, and its derivation from Babylonian, etc. occultism. Reference is made to Sanh. 67b (Exh. 78) where the claim is made that by this magic the rabbis created a calf and ate it. This is followed by turning a woman into an ass (Exh. 80). Creation by Hebrew letters is one means of ascribing God's powers to asinine objects so as to dethrone Him and enthrone Man as the creator. This letter business is Pythgorean. Also:

One learns that: "In uttering a charm one generally expectorated" (Sanh. 1012, Exh. 104). And that "snakes and serpents may be charmed on the Sabbath" (Exh. 105). And that one "is permitted to consult by a charm the spirits of oil or eggs—Both eggs and oil were used for purposes of magic... Every plant in the vegetable kingdom was believed to have its own presiding genius" (Exh. 105).

The dangers of SHABRIRI are pointed out, and reference made to the business of repeating his name, each time dropping one letter until this demon "shrinks" away with the letters of his name, thus curing the blindness he causes (Abodah Zarah 12b, Exh. 176). The cure, under "Abracadabra", is found in the Jewish Ency. Exh. 281.

The TETRAGRAMMATON (Y-H-W-H), the letters of the word Jehova (Hebrew lacks vowels), is reserved for whistling up spirits and it is a "sin" for the unauthorized to use the word. In the California Jewish Voice, and other current Jewish publications the word "God" is written "G-d" for this reason. "The Tetragrammaton, the four-lettered Name of God, was fully pronounced only by the Priests in the temple . . . Everywhere else it was pronounced 'Adonai'", referring to the time of the second temple when the Pharisees were in the ascendancy in Jerusalem (Abodah Zarah 17b-18a, Exh. 181). Using the word as it is sone of the "crimes" charged against Jesus (See Sanh. 55b-56a,

Exh. 56). On this ground Jesus is called a "blasphemer" of the lovely Pharisee pagan custom.

The BA'AL SHEM ("Master of the Name") is the sorcerer who uses this Name of God to make the demons mind him (See Exh. 265), and CHASSIDISM (also spelled Hassidism) is built upon this sort of demonology, Baal Shem Tob being extolled for his activities by Rabbi Louis Finklestein in his work THE PHARISEES (See Exh. 2-3).

See CABALA, above, for further exhibits on Pharisee demonology. The use of AMULETS to drive off Lilith, demoness of childbirth, and of the night, who collects "men's semen" to spawn demons (see Exh. 287 for picture), is part of current Pharisee demonology. By means of these demonistic gadgets one may cause "terror diffused through the world . . . one's enemies set to tearing each other to pieces . . . cause anyone to perish". All this is part of the Cabala or demonology of the Pharisees called "the art of employing the knowledge of the hidden world in order to attain one's purpose . . . ONE MAY THUS EASILY MAKE HIMSELF MASTER OF CREATION"—See Exh. 285, Jewish Ency. on "Amulet". For BIBLICAL enlightenment:

Read that terrible description of the ultimate fall of the Babylonian world government, now rising, in Isaiah 14. Its Anti-Christ head oppressing the earth, reigns in the Luciferian spirit: "I shall be like the most High" (Isa. 14:14). That fall was still future when Christ (96AD) foretold its fall in Revelation 17: it "goeth into perdition" (vs. 11). The sixth or Roman world government was then in power. Compare the prophecy of the fall of this demon-employing power in Jeremiah 51: "And Babylon shall become heaps, a dwelling place for dragons . . . Babylon hath been a golden cup . . . that made all the earth drunken . . . therefore the nations are mad" (Jer. 51: 37, 7). And: "when thou has made an end of reading this book . . . bind a stone to it, and cast it into the midst of the Euphrates: And thou shalt say, Thus shall Babylon sink, and shall not rise from the evil that I will bring upon her . . ." (Jer. 51: 63-4). Such worldwide events await us.

And in Christ's Revelation of this future fall: "And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all . . . for by thy sorceries were all men deceived" (Rev. 18:21, 23). And the "great whore . . . was arrayed in purple and scarlet color . . . having a golden cup in her hand . . . And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" (Rev. 17:1-5).

CHRIST and CHRISTIANS

The ultimate in infamy in Talmudic Judaism is Christ, and the target of all Talmudic hatred is not just "the people who are like an ass—slaves who are considered the property of the master" (Keth. 111a) The docile "asses" willing to be saddled and used will be used as burden bearers for the masters. But of all the recalcitrant "asses" the Christians are the most insanely hated and loathed because their doctrines are the reverse of every Talmudic doctrine. They rank not just as animals like the rest of non-Talmudic humanity, but as vermin to be eradicated. Language is exhausted to find foul and hated names for Christians in the Talmud.

CHRIST as BALAAM

Under the name of "Balaam" the most lewd passages concerning Jesus appear. Proof that Jesus is called "Balaam" is found in the Jewish Encyclopedia ("Balaam") which, after enumerating loathsome qualities, states: "Hence . . . the pseudonym 'Balaam' given to Jesus in Sanhedrin 106b and Gittin 57a". See Exh. 275, also 274.

In the same article, we are told that the Talmud likens the Gospel Christians and Christ to Baal sexworshippers because of whose abominations 24,000 Israelites died of plague at the time of Balaam (Numbers 25:1-9). Because Balaam had been asked to curse the Israelites but instead did not and foretold the coming Messiah (Num. 24:17), the flimsy excuse is made that Jesus was a curse like Balaam. "He is pictured as blind of one eye and lame in one foot and his disciples distinguished by three morally corrupt qualities . . ." He is called "one that ruined a people", and His churches are likened to nudist Baal worship.

And, "this hostility against his memory finds its climax in the dictum that whenever one discovers a feature of wickedness or disgrace in his life, one should preach about it (Sanh. 106b)." Hanging the calumny on the brief mention in the Bible that Balaam was slain (Num. 31:8), this passage in Sanhedrin is cited by the Jewish Ency. thus: "In the process of killing Balaam (Num. xxxi. 8), all four legal methods of execution—stoning, burning, decapitating, and strangling—were employed (Sanh. 1. c.)" (See Exh. 274). "He met his death at the age of thirty-three (Ibid) and it is stated that he had no portion in the world to come (Sanh. x. 2: 90a)."

Sanhedrin 90a denying "Balaam" a place in the world to come begins on Exh. 96. There it is stated that the resurrection being denied by Sadducees and Samaritans, "It was to oppose these that the doctrine was emphatically asserted in the second of the Eighteen Benedictions". The "sin" of pronouncing the Tetragram-

maton is cited against Christ and Christians (Exh. 97)

The Above Encyclopedia Data in the Talmud

Turning to Exhibit 114 which is Sanhedrin 106a-106b mentioned above, we see the likening of Jesus to the supposed act of Balaam in causing 24,000 Israelites to go whoring and die of plague (some 1450 years before Christ was born). He is due for his "reward" for this infamy. His mother, Mary, is "She who . . . played the harlot with carpenters . . . They subjected him to four deaths, stoning, burning, decapitation and strangulation . . . he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old". Another says: "I . . . have seen Balaam's Chronicle in which it stated, 'Balaam the lame was thirty years old when Phineas the Robber killed him". The footnote explains:

"Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus." And the mother of Jesus is identified, the four deaths enumerated, and: "... all the Balaam passages are anti-Christian in tendency, Balaam being used as an alias for Jesus, Phineas the Robber is thus taken to represent Pontius Pilate, and the Chronicle of Balaam probably to denote a Gospel".

Covering then Revealing

The curse of Christians, as those who pronounce the "Name" as "spelt" (Tetragrammaton) and read "uncanonical books", begins with the MISHNA starting on Exh. 97. Vague meanderings to throw off a possible Christian reader appear in the foot-notes on Exh. 97 with the mere hint that the "uncanonical books" may mean this or that but: "There are indications, however, that something more is meant".

But the footnote to "uncanonical books", still being hashed 68 pages later (p. 680 Exh. 102) frankly states it refers to the NEW TESTAMENT, and the word "Sadducees" is used to indicate "Gentiles".

Five Deaths

Jesus, as stated in the Talmud and Encyclopedia account of same, gets the "four legal methods of execution" and is also Crucified, as a blasphemer of this lovely Babylonian Pharisee religion.

JESUS STONED, then "hanged" or crucified, Sanhedrin 43a-45b, Exhs. 46, 48; Sanh. 67a, Exh. 75, where under another phony name (Ben Stada) Jesus is identified as "Jesus of Nazareth". Jewish Ency. Exhs. 277-8

JESUS' APOSTLES all killed, Sanh. 43a-b, Exh. 47, and their names decoded by Jewish Ency., Exh. 278, right column.

JESUS CRUCIFIED as a "blasphemer", Sanh. 46a, Exh. 51, Jewish Ency., Exh. 276.

JESUS BURNED, Sanh. 52a, Exh. 52; manner of burning, Yebamoth 6b, Exh. 151, verified by Jewish Ency. under "Balaam", Exh. 274. He is "lowered into dung up to his armpits then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck and the two loose ends pulled in opposite directions forcing him to open his mouth. A Wick was then lit, and thrown into his mouth so that it descended into his body and burnt his bowels . . . his mouth was forced open with pinchers against his wish . . ." (Exh. 52). And: "The death penalty of 'burning' was executed by pouring molten lead through the condemned man's mouth into his body, burning his internal organs" (Exh. 151).

JESUS STRANGLED: "He was lowered into dung up to his armpits, then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead", Sanh. 52a, Exh. 53. Repeated, Sanh. 106b, Exh. 114, verified by Jewish Ency., Exh. 274.

JESUS IN HELL where His punishment is "boiling hot semen", Gittin 57a, Exh. 202. Identified as Jesus in footnote to same, and in Jewish Ency. under "Balaam" Exh. 275.

CHRISTIANS IN HELL in above passage punished by "boiling hot excrement" which is the punishment for all who mock "at the words of the sages" (Talmud).

JESUS "limped on one foot" and "was blind in one eye", "he practiced enchantment by means of his membrum", "he committed bestiality with his ass", he was a fool who "did not even know his beast's mind", Sanh. 105a,-105b, Exhs. 108-9. The silly and foul misuse of Judges 5:27 about Sisera's dying convulsions meaning sexual intercourse is here applied to Jesus, with the footnote explanation of Judges 5:27: "This is taken to mean sexual intercourse . . ."

JESUS attempts to seduce woman, is excommunicated by a rabbi and then worships a brick, was a seducer of Israel, and practiced magic, Sanh. 107b, Exh. 117 and Jewish Ency. Exh. 277.

JESUS in index of Sanhedrin, "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud" (Exh. 43), showing page numbers where He is denounced. Check with reproductions. Exh. 118.

TRIAL of JESUS: "It was by the action of the priests that Jesus was sent before Pontius Pilate"; the Sanhedrin priests "had most reason to be offended with Jesus' action in cleansing the Temple"; the probable place of His trial, according to the Talmud. His cry: "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? . . . was in all its implications itself a disproof of the exaggerated claims made for him. The very form of his punishment would disprove these claims in Jewish eyes. No Messiah that Jews could recognize could suffer such a death; for 'He that is hanged is accursed of God' (Deut. xxi. 23)". This refers to an EVIL son and Talmudist Rashi adds, "an insult to God". This is from the Jewish Ency. on "Jesus". Exh. 276.

The foul charges against JESUS and His mother, His being a "bastard", etc., appear in the following Exhibit 277 from the same.

JESUS KNEW the TALMUD

Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin), who made the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud, in the section on the History of the Talmud, asks:

Jesus and The Traditions of the Pharisees

"Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it? . . . To such inquiries the learned class of Jewish rabbis answer by holding up the Talmud . . . The Talmud then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders, and to which he makes frequent allusions" (Exh. 27).

CHRISTIANS RANK-Rabbi Eliezer's Filth

The tale told is that because of talking to a Christian Disciple of Jesus, a Rabbi is suspected of being pro-Christian which makes him deeply ashamed. He tells the lie that Jesus taught that the hire of a harlot may be used to build a privy for the high priest (Abodah Zarah 16b-17a). This last pleased the rabbi very much, he says. (Exh. 178).

This filthy story to defame Christ is used in a typical Pharisee lie by Rabbi Louis Finklestein in his THE PHARISEES. Any epithets directed at Pharisaism by Christians in the early centuries he ascribes to conflict between Christians and "their former comrades, who continued loyal to unaltered Pharisaism. Nevertheless, the Pharisee and the Christian remained sufficiently close to regard one another with respect." Then the above Rabbi Eliezer lie is used as a complimentl: "Rabbi Eliezer ben Hyrcanus, one of the most orthodox of the sages, offered high praise to an interpretation of Scripture given by an early Christian (Aboda Zara 17a)"—the above libel on Christl (p. xv-xvi of Foreword to First Edition of THE PHARI-

SEES, of which Exh. 1 is the title page and Exhs. 2 and 3 are pages of the same Foreword).

Christianity Calls from Hell

Incest Preferable to Christianity

The woman who confessed that her younger son was the offspring of her older son and that incest was her lightest sin, wanted to die in peace but could not, for if incest was her lightest sin "it may be assumed that she had also adopted minuth" (Christianity) "... that is why she did not die ... Since she said of her guilt that it is one of the lightest, it may be assumed that she was guilty of idolatry" (Christianity) "also," says this gem of the sages. (Exh. 179-80).

Rabbi ben Dordia the "Pure"

The tale follows about a Rabbi who visited every harlot in the world, with lurid details, crossing seven rivers, etc., to get at the last one. He is allowed to die in peace because he had not committed the unforgivable minuth (Christianity). Abodah Zarah 17a, Exh. 180.

Death from Snakebite

Rabbi Ishmael (sage) has a nephew who is bitten by a snake and wants to let Jacob, a Disciple of Jesus, heal him but dies in the middle of the sentence. The Rabbi thereupon exclaims: "Happy art thou Ben Dama for thou wert pure in body and thy soul likewise left thee in purity. . . ." His joy was over the idea that it was preferable to die of snakebite than to be healed by a detested Christian. (Abodah Zarah 27b, Exh. 187).

More Lies to Fool Us

tianity the Rabbis lived on friendly terms with the minim" (Christians), then the privy tale attributed to Jesus is told as the it indicated friendliness—Abodah-Zarah 16b-17a, and then the above snake story follows:

"Ben Dama, a nephew of Rabbi Ishmael, having been bitten by a snake, allowed himself to be cured by means of an exorcism uttered by the minJacob, a Judaeo-Christian." See the Jewish Ency. article on "MIN," Exh. 267. Christ was amazingly correct in designating the Pharisees as children of the Father of Lies (John 8:44). This is exemplified by the head of the Jewish Theological Seminary, one of world Jewry's 120 top leaders, Rabbi Finklestein, and the Jewish Encyclopedia, compiled by Jewish leaders, both deliberately lying in print about the snake and privy stories in the Talmud pretending they are favorable to Christians instead of being anti-Christian hostilities.

In addition to the FIVE deaths given to Christ in the Talmud, in addition to all the rest of the foul calumnies heaped upon Christ, as reviewed by the Jewish Ency. article "JESUS", Exhibits 276, 277, 278, 279 being full-page reproductions of the same with a continuation of about a half-page on the next sheet, we also learn at the end of Exhibit 279 that: "when Judas found he could not touch Jesus in any way in aerial battle, he defiled him" (the old privy concept of everything beautiful).

Judas and Christ-Mohammedanism

Continuing: "This feature naturally especially angered Christians... according to a passage in the ZO-HAR" (chief set of Cabalistic books) "the same degrading fate is meted out to both JESUS and MO-HAMMED". The Talmudic influence on Mohammedanism is then hinted. Pursuit of this opens up amazing pictures of the infiltration of Talmudists into Mohammedanism as in Mormonism, all of this being concealed from the innocent followers. In fact, the whole theory that God's Chosen People return to Palestine before the reign of the Messiah is unsupported by a line in the New Testament which foretells only that the Anti-Christ forces will be centered in and defeated in Palestine before His Coming. They are there NOW. And the sex-god ZEUS of Daniel 8 (fulfilled in 168 BC) stands in the United Nations headquarters in New York, the sole "religious" object of the whole anti-God institution, the UN.

DEMONOLOGY of the PHARISEES, see CABALA. FINKELSTEIN, RABBI LOUIS: current head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of New York, Los Angeles, etc., is one of the 120 leading Jews of the world chosen by the kehillas (organized Jewish communities) of the world in 1937 from among Jews who were still alive in 1936 and most outstandingly hold up

the lamp of Judaism to the world. Litvinov (Finklestein), the Communist Commissar, bank robber terrorist; atheist communist Albert Einstein; those indefatigable Marxist reds, Harold Laski and his friend Felix Frankfurter (US Supreme Court judge), shared honors with the above Rabbi Finkelstein and others of his ilk.

FRENCH CATHOLIC BANKING: wrecked by the Rothschilds, see Exh. 298.

GIBBON, EDWARD (1737-94): famous English historian, author of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. In 1838 HENRY HART MILMAN, Dean of St. Paul's Cathedral, edited this work and current editions retain his running footnote battle with author Gibbon whenever Gibbon makes penetrating and historical references to the foul activities of Jewry in the Roman empire. For this, and for atheistic works favored by Jewry, MILMAN was "awarded" by prominent Jews for his favorable attitude towards these people—the enemies of his church and supposed Lord, Jesus. See Exh. 283.

GITTIN: a Talmud book on "gittin' the get" or divorce. Its title page is Exh. 199. Part of the Introduction in the Soncino edition, Exh. 200, is followed by some of the dog and dung remedies, the silly filth extolled in the Appendix to this book by a modern Jewish doctor, Feldman, discussed elsewhere. Also the fate of Christians in hell.

GNOSTICISM: see under CABALA herein, Exhibits 288-9-90-91-2; a Jewish anti-God pagan mess of demonism parading as "Christian" in early centuries, "syncretism" being its and Satan's outstanding role; to combine opposites under a deceptive coating, a strategy employed by all the modern pagan occult cults deifying MAN.

GENTILES

This is no place to expound upon the amazing fact that people who really believe in the Book of books, the Bible, and accept the Holy One of Israel, Christ, and the Israel prophets who foretold Him, meekly accept the designation "Gentiles" which in the Bible refers to pagan sex-worshippers, demon-invokers (I Thes. 4:5; I Cor. 10:20, etc.), and let the baby-raping, Metatron-venerating, demon-invoking Talmudists who revile every teaching, every respected character in the

Old Testament—yes, we GIVE these the name of "Israelites" and "Jews", whether they were converted among the 10,000 1954 Jap converts of yesterday, or are Negro, India or Asiatic Talmudists of brown, yellow or black races whose ancestors were converted formerly to this pagan "synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9; 3:9). For the sake of USAGE, the following items are listed as referring to the NON-TALMUDISTS whom we call "Gentiles".

The Basic Doctrine

The basic Talmudic doctrine is more than a superrace complex, it is an "only" race concept. The non-Jew ranks as an animal, has no property rights, no legal rights under any code whatever. Communism is, therefore, but the movement to tickle the noses of the cows to lead them into the barn under milking machines, there to beef those who kick or are dry. The eggs are collected from the human "hens" under Communism, or the hens fried for dinner. If lies, bribes or kicks are necessary to get the cows and hens under control—that is legitimate. There is only one "sin", and that is a frightening technique which will drive the other hens or cows away and make it harder for the "humans" to get them under control again. Milk the Gentile, is the Talmudic rule, but don't get caught in such a way as to jeopardize all Jewish interest. Hence the millions going into "Brotherhood" movements as the "animals" are being stabled across the whole earth by Talmudists and their bought or bossed proselytes.

Jewish Encyclopedia

The Jewish Ency. under "Gentiles" sums up the matter, with some intentional deceptive protective filler, thus:

Misusing Scripture shamelessly and characteristically, the Scriptural lines about God shining are misinterpreted to mean that God shined His laws to Moses on all the nations but since only the Israelites accepted them: "He withdrew His 'shining' legal protection from them, and transferred their property rights to Israel" (same, Exh. 269, upper left column). Then:

"It follows that the Gentiles were excepted from the general civil laws of Moses," and the Baba Kamma Talmud law on ox-goring is cited.

As usual, here MOSES is flouted for he taught again and again that the stranger is not only to be treated the same as the "home-born," or the Israelites, were: "the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shall love him as

thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt ... Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure" (Lev. 19:34-5). "Love ye therefore the stranger ..." (Deut. 10:19); Numbers 9:14; 15:29; "One law and one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you" (Num. 15:15-16, 29), etc.

Abodah Zarah

The excuse of the Pharisaic sages that Mosaic law does not apply to the stranger because he is not a "brother" is the bunk, since Moses told us to treat the stranger and "love him as thyself".

The book of Abodah Zarah, which concentrates on treatment of the non-Jew, but like all other Talmud books runs over the filth field as well, illustrates the status of the non-Jew as poisonous, something to keep separated from, and yet make money out of him. The word PHARISEE comes from the word "separated".

WINE, touched by a non-Jew would be poisoned and unfit to drink from the contact, so in the first English translation (Rodkinson), even, we see that the matter of using the wine after thieves had broken in to a house who might have touched it, is taken up with the Rabbi "who allowed the wine" (to be used) "on the ground that the majority of thieves in that city are Jews. In a similar case that occurred in Nehardea, Samuel" (a top sage), "too, allowed the wine". Both of these Babylonian towns of Pumbeditha and Nehardea were Talmud-Cabala centers for centuries. See Exh. 8

The Talmud teaches, as the Jewish Ency. records that non-Jews have no property rights. Their possessions are "like unclaimed land in the desert." The illustration is given of the Big Shot Rabbi Ashi of the 4th century who, knowing this, acted accordingly and gave "an adroit and evasive answer" when questioned by the Gentile owner of a vineyard who overheard Ashi tell his slave to go into his vineyard and get him some grapes if the vineyard belonged to a Gentile, but not to take any if the owner be a Jew. "Is it permitted to take from a Gentile?" the owner asked. Ashi's evasive answer is given with the explanation that it showed: "In truth Ashi coincided with the opinion of the authority stated above: namely, that . . . Gentile . . . property is considered public property, like unclaimed land in the desert".

And the authority above, the one which holds that Gentile property is like unclaimed land in the desert, is Baba Bathra 54b, there cited. This passage appears on page 222 of the Soncino edition: "Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel: The property of a heathen is on the same footing as desert land; whoever first occupies it acquires ownership". See "Gentiles", Exh. 270.

OXEN (Exh. 39)

Did the saying about right and wrong depending upon "whose ox is gored" come from the following? Baba Kamma 37b states the doctrine of all Talmudism in terms of injury done by oxen. If a Canaanite's (Gentile's) ox gores another Canaanite's ox or an Israelite's ox gores that of another Israelite, damages MUST BE PAID. But, if an Israelite's ox gores the ox of a non-Jew, or Canaanite, "THERE IS NO LIABILITY!" It makes no difference whether the animal was or was not fierce and a gorer which should have been kept shut up. Injury done to the property of a non-human "Canaanite" by the property of a human is perfectly legitimate. One does not reimburse "animals" for their loss of property.

LOST ARTICLES, (Exh. 40)

The Talmud always quotes the Bible in order to reverse it. Here Moses' admonition about returning lost articles, whether or not one knew the "brother" who had lost them, is cited. This does not apply to non-humans, however, since these are not the Jew's "brother". It is a sin to return a lost article to a non-Jew, UN-LESS the risk is run of letting people know the criminal and anti-human character of the so-called "Jewish" religion, causing a "profanation of the Name" of the infamous god of Judaism (Pharisaism), which Christ said was Satan (John 8:44). Exhs. 40, 84.

Lives of the "Saints" on Cheating, etc. Gentiles (Exh. 40-1)

This inspirational passage continues in Baba Kamma 113b with the examples of the pillars, the "saints" of Pharisaism, in cheating, deceiving, lying to Gentiles. Let us sit at the feet of these "masters".

The great Samuel who bought a gold bowl of a Gentile while pretending what he knew was false—that the bowl was brass, also cheated the goy on the change besides! This great man who bested a Gentile "ass" was the supreme head of the Talmud academy at Nehardea, Babylonia, where he had been born and died (about 257 AD) to be glorified in Talmudic legend. He wears today the Talmudic halo (of Satan's deception) as a figure to be emulated.

Continuing this religious exercise of Baba Kamma 113b, we see that cute old duck, Rabbi Kahana, who pretended to the goy that he was buying 100 barrels he knew to be 120, and while the goy was telling him: "I am relying upon you as to the number of the barrels", Kahana also short-changed him! Whatta clever man!

Rabina is another saint of Talmudism mentioned in this same passage. He was an associate of Rabbi Ashi whose noble example about stealing grapes is cited by the Jewish Encyclopedia, as mentioned above. Ashi was director of the Talmud academy at Sura, Babylonia, then the "Vatican" of world Talmudism, and Rabina was his assistant: "Next to Ashi, Rabina had the greatest share in the redaction of the Talmud undertaken by Ashi and his colleagues" (Jewish Ency., "Rabina I"). This "saint" who died about 420 AD bought a palm, we humble ones are taught, together with a goy or Gentile, which was to be divided. After being chopped up, Rabina sent his slave telling him to bring him the choice parts "QUICK" but to take the right number as the goy knew the number and it is not smart to get caught cheating the goy. Cute?

Learn and practice these noble deeds by studying Exhibits 40 and 41 of Baba Kamma 113b!

STEALING WOMEN, GOODS, MURDERING GENTILES (Exh. 57)

In the "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud" (together with Makkoth or beatings), which is the book of SANHEDRIN (see introduction, Exh. 43), is this repetition of the animal status of the non-Jew so far as legal or human rights are concerned, in anhedrin 57a, Exh. 57. The footnote explains that the censor (for the Talmudists) inserted the word "Cuthean" in substitution for the word GOY or Gentile, to fool the possible non-Jewish reader as to the real meaning. To quote:

"With respect to robbery—if one stole or robbed" (Footnote: by secret stealing or by open violence) "or seized a beautiful woman, or committed similar offenses, if these were perpetrated by one Cuthean against another, the theft, etc., must not be kept, and likewise the theft of an Israelite by a Cuthean, BUT THAT of a CUTHEAN by an ISRAELITE MAY BE RETAINED". Sufficient filler is inserted in the footnotes to confuse the goy reader, with a reference to the footnote on Baba Kamma 37b which may be seen in Exh. 39. There, the lying suppositions that non-Jews have no "laws of social justice" are said to justify this inhuman standard of immorality taught by the ox-goring Mishna of B. K. 37b and elsewhere in the whole

MURDER: "For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean or of an Isrealite by a Cuthean, PUNISH-MENT is INCURRED: but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, THERE IS NO DEATH PENALTY". And confusing miasma is inserted in the footnote. But the same doctrine abides thruout the whole Talmud. Glancing at the Jewish Ency. article on "Gentiles" we see that Rabbi Simon ben Yohai's edict is: "The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed". Three and a half large pages are devoted to this last worthy, whose black magic voodoo is venerated by the Cabalists in

Talmudism (See Jewish Ency. under "Simeon ber Yohai"). He was a pupil of the second century revolutionist Akiba, another top "saint", under whose leadership some million non-Jews were murdered until purdown by the Romans.

CHEATING a Gentile Out of WAGES (Exh. 58)

The oily reasons for pure Satanism being taught are sometimes amusing in their transparency. Exhibit 58 reproduces the continuation of the above "religious" teaching about Gentiles. Applying it to "withholding of a labourer's wage. One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is forbidden, but an Israelite from a CUTHEAN is PERMITTED", says the Talmud text. The laugh is in the footnote which states that: "This only borders on a robbery, for actual robbery means depriving a person of what he already possesses". So, if a laborer never gets his wages he cannot be robbed of what he never got! The shyster mind at work!

SODOMY and KILLING a Gentile (Exh. 59)

This Sanhedrin 58b passage not only states that sodomy or: "Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew" and permits sodomy with a "neighbor's wife," but also teaches that "If a heathen smites a Jew he is worthy of death". The Bible is hooked in then characteristically by mentioning that Moses killed an Egyptian who was mistreating one of his flock. This follows: "Rabbi Hanina also said: 'He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence'". By turning one word into another, then without rhyme or reason picking out a verse in Proverbs 20:25 ("It is a snare to the man who devoureth that which is holy."), the teaching is evolved that "One who smiteth MAN—that is an Israelite—attacketh the Holy One". The basic Pharisee teaching being, of course that only Pharisees are "men."

"Only Israelites are Men," (Exh. 268)

"The Pharisees ... held that only Israelites are MEN ... Gentiles they classed not as MEN but as barbarians", says the Jewish Ency. article on "Gentiles". After the word MEN in the above passage, you may note in the original, is this: "quoting the prophet, 'Ye my flock the flock of my pasture are MEN'", with Ezekiel 34:31 given as the Biblical, and Baba Mezia 108b as the Talmudic basis for this doctrine. What of the sense?

The Ezekiel verse ends the 34th chapter, a parable about good and bad cattle, promised justice and a Redeemer, being addressed as a "flock": "and I will judge between cattle and cattle. And I will set up one shepherd over them, even my servant David" (Christ)—the whole ending with the explanation of the parable:

"And ye my flock... are men" (not cattle)" and I am your God, saith the Lord God."

The Talmud invents and adds to the above words in the Baba Mezia 108b passage (not reproduced): "only ye are designated as 'MEN'". This Ezekiel verse is a popular quotation in the Talmud, always misused to infer that Talmudists are MEN but non-Talmudists are beasts, cattle.

The Baba Mezia passage is about the graves of Gentiles which rank like the graves of animals. "The graves of Gentiles do not defile", is the edict based upon this same Ezekiel verse: "Ye my flock . . . are MEN", and reference is made to Numbers 19:14 which lays out the rule that when a man has died in his tent, those who come in to the tent are suspect for seven days—as they may have caught the communicable disease perhaps, which killed the corpse. But that rule does not apply to dead Gentiles. They do not rank as human carcasses. The Sage who mouths this last choice bit is the above mentioned Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai (p. 651, Soncino edition, Baba Mezia, 114a-114b, not reproduced).

KILL THE GENTILE WHO STUDIES TORAH, (Exh. 60)

There is a sound reason for the doctrine that: "A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death . . . it is our inheritance, not theirs . . . he is as guilty as one who violates a betrothed maiden." Of course knowledge of the anti-human criminality of the Talmud Torah would put non-Jews on their guard. And the footnote here explains:

"This seems a very strong expression . . . it is suggested that Rabbi Johanan feared the knowledge of Gentiles in matters of Jurisprudence, as they would use it against the Jews in their opponents' courts. . .the Talmud places R. Johanan's dictum. . .immediately after the passage dealing with the setting up of law courts by Gentiles". And it goes on to say that study of the Oral Law (Talmud) is what is feared, and the same R. Johanan also said "God's covenant with Israel was only for the sake of the Oral Law".

They "Sit in Moses' Seat"

Bear in mind that ORAL LAW, the Traditions of the Pharisees, recorded in the Talmud, completely reverse each teaching of Moses, who time and again taught that the non-Israelite, the "stranger", must be treated, be loved, as one's self! No wonder Christ said "the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat", and by their Tradition make the commandments of God of none effect (Matt. 15:3, 6; Mark 7:13).

MURDERING GENTILES SANCTIFIES, (Exh. 90-2)

Murdering Gentiles might be classed with killing

wild animals for which the State pays one a bounty, according to the Talmud. Even more, the attempt to kill a Gentile so sanctifies a Jew that if he kills another "human", or Jew, in the attempt, the sin is washed away and there is no penalty. This sport flourishes in Jew-run Iron Curtain countries. The core of the long harangue in Sanh. 78b- 79a is if a Jew: "intended killing. . .a heathen and he killed a Israelite. . .he is not liable". After typical silly twaddle, this is repeated in the Gemara, Exh. 91, BUT: "if he intended killing one Israelite and killed another, HE IS LIABLE. The next page, weighing the purity of the killer's keart, says if a Jew: "threw a stone into a company of Israelites and heathens. . .Shall we say the company consisted of nine heathens and one Israelite . . . his NON-LIABILITY can be inferred from the fact that the majority were heathens. . .even if half and half. . .Since . . .we do not know whether he aimed at an Israelite or a heathen. . .he is not liable". A footnote concludes that this "verse under discussion teaches that the murderer IS NOT LIABLE". Even the breath of suspicion that the Jew was trying to kill a Gentile purifies him and purges him of the murder of another Jew, or "human". Ah! the beauties of "brotherhood" as taught by Talmudism!

GENTILES MUST SUFFER to Make JEWS THE MESSIAH, Exh. 100

Altho some Jews look for a War Lord individual who will help place Jewry on the throne of the world, the actual view of Judaism is that the Jewish people themselves comprise the Messiah, and their reign is the Messianic reign (foretold for Christ in the Bible). The tribulation foretold to precede the reign of Christ, in which Satanism strives to subdue the world, is scoffed at by the Talmud and called "fictitous". Babylonian power will not fall. The tribulation will be but "the throes of mother Zion which is in labor to bring forth the Messiah—without metaphor, the Jewish people" (Kethuboth Illa, Exh. 147). In other words, to call the Jewish people the Messiah is no metaphor; they are literally just that; they are the Messiah, says the Talmud.

The passage in Sanhedrin 98b (Exh. 100) records the exulting words of the Pharisee rabbis: "The Jews are destined to eat their fill in the days of Messiah". Above these words is this: "When the ox runs and falls, the horse is put into his stall", which is explained thus: "it will be difficult to remove the Gentiles from their position without inflicting much suffering". And then: "The years of plenty which the Messiah will usher in will be enjoyed by the Israelites".

Bear in mind, always, that the pagan Babylonian Talmudists have stolen the Biblical names for the followers of the Holy One of Israel (Christ) who believe in Him and in the Israel prophets who fore-told Him. Biblically, they are the sex-worshipping "Gentiles" and we are spiritually "Israel". But, let them reverse things; they HAVE.

The congregation of Israel was never a racial entity, any more than Catholicism or Protestantism. The Bible testifies to that. All blessings promised Christians are stolen.

LET the GENTILES MOURN, Exh. 101

"Thus Israel should hope for the redemption, because it will be a day of light to them, but why should the Gentiles, seeing that for them it will be a day of darkness?"

NON-JEWS Are "The People Who Are Like an ASS" Exh 148

The utterly mad way in which the Bible is tossed about to make a "whited sepulchre" for Talmudic Babylonian filth and criminality is illustrated by Kethuboth Illa. A reach here, and a grab there, and the Pharisee "sages" make out their own Satanic meaning out of unrelated scriptural verses, plays on words, and other childish devices. We see in Exh. 148: "it is written, 'Unto the people upon it'," and this is hooked to Isaiah 42:5 in the footnote. Isaiah 42:5 is a verse which refers to God as: "he that spread forth the earth. . he that giveth breath unto the people upon it", which has nothing to do with what follows immediately: "and elsewhere it is written, 'Abide ye here with the ASS' which may be rendered 'PEOPLE THAT ARE LIKE AN ASS—SLAVES WHO ARE CONSIDERED THE PROPERTY OF THE MASTER'". The reference is to the Gentile Canaanite, the "Canaanite bondwoman". The source of the phrase, "Abide ye here with the ass", given, is Genesis 22:5 which concerns Abraham going off to pray: "And Abraham said unto his young men, Abide ye here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again unto you." Which has no more to do with the doctrine above than the price of eggs.

Sly little verses are put in as a code in the above, such as: "Now according to Eliezer—Who based his view on Ezekiel 26:20..." This verse refers to the fall

Talmudism is the quintescence of distilled hatred, discrimination without cause.

ALWAYS MAKE MONEY, Exh. 174-5

The book of Abodah Zara on relations with the non-Jew is a series of contortions aimed to keep the "human" Jew separate from the "animal" Gentile and still make money off the Gentile. Christians, particularly, are designated as "idolators" with Jesus as the "idol". The Mishna of Abodah Zarah llb-12a attempts to shyster around the question of how to go to an "idolatrous festival" and do business without technically being there. The windy doctrine about the road leading to it is a howl:

"If the Road Leads Solely To That Place, It Is Forbidden, But If One Can Go By It To Any Other Place, It Is Permitted."

But the essence of it all is in this: "the Sages should not mind the possibility of receiving money of an idolater". This has a footnote to confuse a goy reader and keep him from the plain meaning.

GOING TO GENTILE STADIUMS, Exh. 182

On the general principle that dealing with a Gentile is dealing with a dirty animal, the Jew is here rabbincally forbidden to attend these gatherings at stadiums: "BUT Rabbi Nathan permits it for two reasons: first, because by shouting one may save the victim, secondly because one might be able to give evidence of death for the wife of a victim and so enable her to remarry". And marriage in the sexual sense is the aim, the end, the center, of the Talmudic mind. It is mandatory. A man is supposed to copulate after his children are grown, even if he has to take a wife who is old and deformed, etc.

The answer to the teaching that at "theaters and circuses entertainments are arranged there in honour of the idols" (Christian characters) — nevertheless "THERE is a DIFFERENCE in the CASE of CALLING to do BUSINESS". So, idols or not, one should call to do business with the loathed ones.

BUILDING GENTILE CHURCHES, Exh 183

This is part of a long harangue about the Mishna on page 81 (this is page 102), all about what can and cannot be built for non-Jews, which reads in part: "ONE SHOULD NOT JOIN THEM IN BUILDING

A BASILICA. . . BUT ONE MAY JOIN THEM IN BUILDING PEDESTALS FOR ALTARS. . .WHEN HOWEVER ONE REACHES THE CUPOLA IN WHICH THE IDOL IS PLACED HE MUST NOT BUILD.

The "IDOL" in chief is Christ, the saints being lesser idols in Talmudic lingo.

This Exhibit takes up the part about the cupola where the idol is placed. The hairsplitting then starts: if a Jew DID build the cupola he could accept the pay for this. Anyway, until the idols are actually worshipped, connection with these is not forbidden. But just making the thing ready for idol worship is all that is forbidden, and that is not done until the last stroke of work is done, and since the last stroke is not worth a "peruta" or smallest coin, the Jew can be paid for the whole job anyway.

Making jewelry for "idols" is forbidden EXCEPT for pay. One shouldn't sell to "idolaters" (Christians) things attached to the soil so the solution is to detach them and then sell them to the goys, or "goyim".

Silly? Windy? Of course. No wonder Christ called the Pharisees "Fools!" (Matt. 23:17).

ONLY FOR PAY, Exh. 185

Two pretty thoughts dominate this section of Abodah Zarah 26a. The Talmudic woman may not act as wet-nurse to a Christian child because she would thereby be rearing "a child for idolatry". A Christian or non-Jewish woman should not be allowed to act as wet-nurse for a Talmudist's child: "BECAUSE SHE IS LIABLE TO MURDER IT". Those dear old brotherhood thoughts. And Rabbi Meir, whom the Talmud says was a descendant of NERO, (a proselyte to Judaism noted for his butcheries of Christians while under the sway of his mistress-wife Poppaea), is the author of this and of the further admonition that even when others are watching it is not safe as the Christian "may take the opportunity of rubbing in poison on her breast beforehand and so kill the child." The chorus of Sages is primarily against the above unless this exception be made: "A Jewish woman may act as midwife to a heathen woman for PAYMENT, but not gratuitously!" And even on the Sabbath this is okay on the ground that refusal would arouse bad feeling toward Jews in general, and at all costs the goy must be fooled and kept from knowing the undying hatred felt for all non-Talmudic humanity by the followers of the Pharisees, or "separated" ones.

The Boy on the ROOF, Exh. 186

Those wonderful "Sages" even provide useful excuses so that one may have an excuse for letting a Gentile die in a pit. In general, non-Jews are not to

be thrown down a pit to die—that would make back feeling against Jews—except in the case of "MINIM" (Christians), apostates (from Talmudism) and informers (about the criminal nature of the Jewish religion)—THESE "may be cast in and need not be brought up."

Of course, there is always the matter of PAYMENT: "one is obliged to bring them up on account of ill feeling". But another Sage, Abaye, brings up the prize with:

"He could offer such excuses as, 'I have to run to my boy who is standing on the roof', or, 'I have to keep an appointment at the court'". Then, of course, the Gentile would be happy to die in the pit and no blame be attached to the Jew (with the boy who is allegedly standing on the roof, or who has to attend a mythical court). Clever?

Reference is made in the footnote to Abodah Zarah 13b (not reproduced) where it is repeated: "As to idolaters...even though one is not bound to get them out of a pit, one must not throw them in" (that is if they are not Christians, or "minim"). And reference is also made to Sanhedrin 57b where the silliest excuse perhaps of all is found to permit sentencing non-Jews to death with one witness, even a relative, one judge—just get him sentenced! Why bother with usual procedures?

"The interpretation is based on the use of the singular, 'I will require'". God not being plural, witnesses need not be plural. Why this only applies, as it does not apply to anything at all in the witness case, to just Gentiles, is not bothered with. The Bible is a grab-bag to have its pieces slapped on Pharisee criminality as a "whited sepulchre".

BETTER DIE THAN LET A CHRISTIAN HEAL Exh. 187

"Ben Dama, a nephew of Rabbi Ishmael, having been bitten by a snake, allowed himself to be cured by means of an exorcism uttered by the min Jacob, a Judaeo-Christian." Read the rest of it, blaming Christians for unfriendly feelings between Jews and Christians ("Min", Exh. 266, left column).

GENTILE BABIES DEFILE, Exh. 188-9

Sodomy being such an accepted privilege in Talmudism, we here learn that the exception may be if the subject is a Gentile baby. And on the ground of defilement only, then, the Sages decree that a heathen child causes "defilement by seminal emission, so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty (sodomy) with him". Then the harangue starts as to the age when a heathen child starts defiling by discharges (which are only possible after adolescence).

The standard silly idiotic doctrine is then repeated that a male is "capable of the sexual act" at "nine years and one day" and a female from the age of "three years and one day". From those ages on they defile the Jew, goes the argument in this passage, despite the standard doctrine that adultery with the wife of a non-Jew is never amiss. It is okay. The Sages just love to invent and discuss dirt; any sort of dirt against non-Jews being preferred.

Gentiles and Moses, Exh. 269

The GENTILE Not a "NEIGHBOR'

Says the Jewish Ency.: "The Mishna. . . declares that if a Gentile sue an Israelite, the verdict is for the defendant" (the Jew); "if the Israelite is the plaintiff, he obtains full damages." BabaKamma is then cited, the 4th chapter and 3rd Mishna, which is about the ox-goring being okay if the ox belongs to a Jew and gores the ox of a non-Jew (See Exh. 39). Any injury to the hated Gentile is holy.

And in Baba Kamma 113b (not reproduced, p. 664 of Soncino edition) is this: "Where a suit arises between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: 'This is OUR law'; so also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens, justify him and say to the

"Now, according to Rabbi Akiba the whole reason appears to be because of the sanctification of the Name, but were there no infringement of the sanctification of the Name, we could circumvent him!". And that is Talmudic "virtue" thru and thru.

Which is why the Talmud teaches that a Gentile must NOT be taught the Torah (See Exh. 272). And a Jew who teaches a Gentile Torah "deserves death" (same).

GENTILES MUST NOT REST Even on MONDAYS (Exh. 272)

There are no labor union laws for Gentiles under Talmudic "religious" rule: "A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death. . .not even on Mondays is the Gentile allowed to rest—probably to discourage general idleness", says the Jewish Ency quoting Sanhedrin 58b. This passage (not reproduced, p. 399, Soncino edition) states: "A heathen who keeps a day of rest, deserves death. . . . Their prohibition is the death sentence".

What Does the Bible Teach?

Now, you wonder how these "People of the Book" ring the Bible in on that? After the word "death" in the above quotation from the Talmud is this: "for it is written, 'And a day and a night they shall not rest' (Genesis 8:22"). And here is the Genesis verse:

"While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease". There is no bearing whatsoever.

More Bouquets for Gentiles

me a goy" (Jewish Ency., Exh. 273)

THE EIGHTEEN BENEDICTIONS, Exh. 284

The "religious" Jew recites the "Eighteen Benedictions". or "Shemoneh Esreh", three times week days four times on holidays and Sabbaths, the 7th and 12th of which curse the Christians and non-Jews to hell and perdition. Thus, the "good Orthodox Jew" gives us Christians 6 cursings on ordinary days, 8 on specials. Note all the changes in double talk which have been utilized down the centuries to keep the truth about the "Shemoneh Esreh" from the non-Jews, who might not be friendly to those who recite this 'Brotherhood' litany religiously 6 to 8 times daily! Note: "in order to obviate hostile misconstructions, the text was modified. . . .", and one change after another to fool the gov is enumerated.

The 12th, the "Birkat ha-Minim" (curse against Christians, etc.) "furnished the traducers of Judaism and the Jews a ready weapon of attack" (Exh. 284). This "Petition Against Enemies" (non-Jews) is called an "imprecatory appeal" and "imprecatory" means: "invoking evil, a curse" (Webster). And: "the SEV-ENTH benediction...looks like a duplication and is superfluous", says the wary Jewish Ency.

For SWEARING FALSELY to GENTILES, Exh. 171

One of the handiest little contraptions provided by the Sages to offset Moses' laws against swearing falsely, is found in the Talmud book of NEDARIM (vows), and is put into practice yearly in every synagogue across the world as "Kol Nidre" (all vows). But the Bible teaches:

The Mishna on this, with some confusing filler, states: "Every Vow Which I May Make In The Future Shall Be Null'. His Vows Are Then Invalid Providing That He Remembers This At The Time Of The Vow" (Nedarim 23a, Exh. 171). Discounting the filler about a man eating with his friend, we see the footnote (Exh. 172):

"This may have provided support for the custom of reciting KOL NIDRE (a formula for dispensation of vows) prior to the Evening Service of the Day of Atonement.... But KOL NIDRE as part of the ritual is later than the TALMUD.. (as).. the law of revocation in advance was not made public". To this one might add: not until it was considered safe to do so, and it usually is not safe. The Jewish Ency. account on KOL NIDRE relates how this custom of revoking all vows to be made a year in advance was used in European countries to bar the oath of a Jew.

AROVE KOL NIDRE TEXT

The text of the KOL NIDRE may be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia (not reproduced here). Three times the cantor, to a tune that sounds like the melodious grief of the ages, pompous, "bellyaching", intones the words: "All VOWS, OBLIGATIONS, OATHS... whether called 'konam', 'konas', or by any other name, which we may VOW or SWEAR, or PLEDGE, or whereby we may be BOUND, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, ANNULLED, and VOID, and made of no effect ... The VOWS shall not be reckoned VOWS; the OBLIGATIONS shall not be OBLIGATIONY; nor the OATHS be oaths".

The reply of the congregation confirming this infamy is typical of the blasphemous use of the Bible. Three times they moan a verse from Numbers. It concerns the duty of a congregation which has violated the laws of God in ignorance. They are to repent, make a repentance offering:

"And it shall be forgiven all the congregation of Israel, and the stranger that sojourneth among them; seeing all the people were in IGNORANCE" (Numbers 15:26).

GENTILES Are "BEASTS", Exh. 270

"The Torah" (Talmud) "outlawed the issue of a Gentile as that of a beast", Ezekiel 23:20 being given as the excuse. This chapter likens whoring Judah and Israel kingdoms to two sisters Aholah and Aholibah, both prostitutes, the grossness of whose paramours is likened to that of asses, and their illegitimate offspring to the "issue of horses". The utterly public mass sex-perversions, sadism and child-burning voodoo practices of these sexworshippers, in which offspring were spawned, was the subject of Ezekiel's lambasting. He promised the Judaites the same fate as their "sister" whore, the Israel kingdom, had experienced at the hand of God for the same crimes, for the Assyrians killed and deported the ten-tribe kingdom in 721 BC.

The amazing hypocrisy of the Talmud is that while endorsing burning children to Molech (see herein), sodomy, rape, incest, murder, perjury, etc., the very sins condemned by the Bible, the derision for the perpetrators voiced by Ezckiel and other Prophets, as in Isaiah 57:3, 5, etc., is turned instead against the anti-Talmudists who CONDEMN such sins. No wonder Christ exhausted language in denouncing Pharisaism.

HADRIAN and the JEWS

HASIDISM

Like so many Talmudic words this one is spelled in various ways: Chasidism; and with a "C" and two "s's", an "H" and two "s's". The Jewish encyclopedias of 1905 and 1943 use the above spelling, however. HASIDISM is called a religious movement within the fold of Talmudism "which won over nearly half of the Jewish masses." Its leading "Billy Graham" evangelist was Israel Baal Shem Tob, shortened to the "Besht". Father-to-son dynasties were set up of Hasidist leaders, wonderworkers, fortune-tellers, invokers of spirits,

healers, who employed drunkenness, singing, dancing, to create states of "ecstasy". Evil was indulged in to "purify" it. To quote the Jewish Ency. of 1905:"

"The teachings of HASIDISM . . . are founded on two theoretical conceptions: (1) religious PANTHE-ISM . . . and (2) the idea of communion between God and man . . which was adopted from the CABALA . . . not only that Deity influences the acts of man, but also that man exerts an influence on the will and mood of Deity. Every act and word of man produces a corresponding vibration in the upper spheres. From this conception is derived the chief practical principle of Hasidism—communion with God for the purpose of uniting with the source of life and influencing it . . ."

The name of God is used, in defiance of the Word of God, to summon up spirits. The skeleton letters of the Hebrew name for Jehovah, Y-H-W-H-, there being no vowels in Hebrew, are used in fanciful 14, 42, 72 voodoo combinations to evoke the demons. The Luciferian concept of the whole Cabala and of pagan sects, past and present, is that MAN can be God if he knows how. See CABALA exhibits, etc.

Isaiah in 712 BC foretold the fall of the Babylonian world power, still future, in the same words as Christ did at the end of the first century. The Babylonian wicked woman directress of it is to fall "for the multitude of thy sorceries, and for the great abundance of thine enchantments" (Isa. 47:9; Rev. 18:7). Moses commanded: "There shall not be found among you any one . . . that useth divination, or an observer of times" (astrology) "or an enchanter or a witch" (Deuteronomy 18:10). And those black arts are denounced thruout Scripture. They may evoke power, but cursed power.

The "Baal Shem", or master of the name, is also called a saint or Zaddik who, to quote the Universal Jewish Ency.: "rules by the possession of the largest number of... sparks' of divine emanation... he stands on the same level as Moses and the Prophets, and not only speaks with the authority of the Torah, but may even change and abrogate it. The HASIDIM must live in submission to the Zaddik, surround him with their love and confidence, bring him gifts, cater to his every whim, and not question his conduct even when it seems to depart from the accepted norm".

Gershom Sholem, head of the department of Jewish Mysticism at the Hebrew University in Palestine, in his book of lectures delivered at red Rabbi S. S. Wise's Jewish Institute of Religion in N. Y. (Schocken Books, N. Y., 1946), extolls Baal Shem Tob, the 18th century

evangelist of IIASIDISM, as does Rabbi Finklestein, in his "The Pharisees" (see Exh. 1-3), head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, to which Sholem also pays tribute and thanks for aid.

Sholem calls Baal Shem Tob "a true Baal Shem, that is to say . . . a master of practical Kabbalism, a MA-GICIAN" (p. 349). He closes his book with the prophecy that Jewish mysticism still has its greatest role to play. In that he coincides with the Bible and the prophecies of the Anti-Christ and his wonderworking after the order of Satan (II Thes. 2:9).

And the Universal Jewish Ency. ("Hasidism") is correct in stating that "Hasidism had not introduced any religious novelties into Judaism" (p. 240). And by Judaism is meant Babylonian Talmudic Pharisaism, which at base is crass paganism, pantheistic atheism, a conglomeration of all the forms of paganism concocted thru the centuries. The new words concocted for this very old satanism, "immanence" (Spinoza) "emanation" (Talmudic Cabala), "dialectical materialism" (Marx) merely dress up a very old pagan idea. See "Scphirot". Also "Moses Hess", its warm proponent.

MOSES HESS (1812-1875)

Like Karl Marx, "father of modern Socialism", Hess was born in Germany of Talmudic rabbinical ancestry, being steeped in Orthodox Judaism by the rabbi grandfather who raised him. He was active with Marx and Engels in promoting Communism which, he held, could best be achieved on a world-wide scale thru Hasidism and Nationalism, or Zionism, based upon Orthodox Judaism. That he remains the pillar of present-day Zionism is illustrated by the fact that the Jewish press announces the removal of his body to Israel, currently.

"He collaborated with Marx in writing, 'Die Deitsche Ideologie' (1845) . . . his continued publicizing for practical socialism in Germany earned him a sentence of death after the 1848 revolution" (Universal Jewish Ency.). His chief work, authorities agree, is "Rome and Jerusalem", translated by Meyer Waxman and published by the Bloch Pub. Co., "The Jewish Book Concern", N. Y., in 1945. He rushed home in 1848, says the Translator, from Paris, "taking an active part in the armed resistance of the people" (p. 22). "In 1845, Hess engaged in propagating the Communistic idea and founding societies devoted to its realization, an occupation which led Arnold Ruge to describe him as "The Communist Rabbi Moses'" (pp. 21-2).

Altho, "The fundamental principle of Hess' thought ... is based on the teaching of Spinoza, of which he was a devoted follower", he went further, says the Translator, in expounding the "basic unity" of mind and matter, "the basic unity and its various unfoldings".

COMMENTARÝ 63

In other words, he was a better pagan philosopher, even, than the pantheist Spinoza. Prayers, ritual and show are for the little "Jew". In the higher echelons the atheist Einsteins and Jewish Theological Seminary Finklesteins see eye to eye. As will be seen in the "Pharisee' article in the Jewish Encyclopedia, all personality, intelligence, planning and Biblical powers were taken from the Deity by the pagan Pharisees. This is called ridding the Bible of "anthropomorphisms" (Exh. 264, left column). And these powers were handed out to individual spirits, as in paganism.

The Translator quotes from a later article of Hess (p. 30) with a long German title, in which Hess holds that Judaism: "began with the family of the individua and will finally end with a family of nations" (p. 30). The Orthodox Jews have, in his opinion, a much higher and truer conception of Judaism. They have retained . . . the kernel of Nationalism, and the desire for Jewish restoration . . . He advocated the colonization of Palestine . . . he also dreamed of a Jewish Congress, demanding the support of the Powers for the purchase of Palestine . . . " (p. 32).

Hess on Breaking Down Christianity

Says Hess in his Preface to "Rome and Jerusalem": "From the time that Innocent III" (forced Jews to wear distinctive badges and be treated as the anti-Christians that they are and have been, 1198-1216 AD) "...Papal Rome symbolized to the Jews an inexhaustible well of poison. It is only with the drying up of this source that Christian German Anti-Semitism will die from lack of nourishment. With the disappearance of the hostility of Christianity ... to Judaism, with the liberation of the Eternal City on the banks of the Tiber, begins the liberation of the Eternal City on the slopes of Moriah; the renaissance of Italy heralds the rise of Judah ... Springtime in the life of nations began with the French Revolution".

Sneering at Christianity, holding up the myth of a Jewish race (instead of a breed of all races and nations dedicated to the "synagogue of Satan"), extolling the Talmud and delegating Moses to the inferior role given him therein (p. 91), the whole cry of Hess is for Jewish world rule from Palestine "between Europe and

"You have contributed enough to the cause of civilization and have helped Europe on the path of progress to make revolutions and carry them out successfully". He calls for Jews to "March forward!" and says: "the world will again pay homage to the oldest of peoples" (pp. 139-40). The "Talmud is the corner-stone of modern" Orthodoxy, (p. 143). He looks to the black magic, the occultism of CHASIDISM, which along with Zionism is to achieve the Communist dictatorship of the "humans" over the non-Jewish animals: "The great good which will result from the combination of CHASIDISM with the national movement is almost incalculable", he declares (p. 218). He adds: "Althothe CHASIDIM are without social organization, they live in socialistic fashion" (same).

The Translator called Hess, in the 1918 edition Preface: "The herald of Nationalism and the trumpet of Zionism". In the second edition of 1943, he points out the words of Hess (now 68 years old):

AMERICA is Doing It Now

"America represents the general regenerating power by means of which all elements of historical peoples will be assimilated into one" (Ninth letter). That the whole United Nations and its NATO are set up to flush in peoples, of contrasting races, is no accident. Liquidation and deportation are the two chief weapons of Soviet Jewish power.

Hebrew Union College

Founded by Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise in 1875 (Cincinnati, Ohio), who introduced Reform Judaism into the USA from Germany after his arrival here (1846), and who headed the College, a rabbinical training school, until his death (1900). Wise also edited the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud (1903, Boston) by Michael L. Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin) which, for safety's sake, was abridged and without identifying folio numbers. See Exh. 4.

Hille

A Babylonian who founded a school by his name (Beth Hillel) and was the acknowledged "Nasi" or prince of Jewry for 40 years in Palestine, from 30 BC to 10 AD. His edicts are considered the "milder" in contrast with his school's hairsplitting "opponents", the school of Shammai, another top Pharisee "sage" of Christ's time in Palestine. Their senseless harangues about filthy trifles fill the Babylonian Talmud. See Exh. 31-2. Centers in some 200 American colleges are named for Hillel.

Hyrcanus, Janai

Horayoth, title page, Exh. 192

INCEST Mother and Son, (Exh. 82)

Moses ordered the priests that: "They shall not take a wife that is a whore, or profane . . . for he is holy unto his God" (Leviticus 21:7). The laws against incest are most vehement: "the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother . ." (Lev. 18:7). And this is what the Pharisce "sages" make of this:

"If a woman sported lewdly with her young son, a minor, and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her—Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her unfit to the Priesthood" (And here the footnote explains that she could not marry a priest if this made her profane and the above Lev. 21:7 is quoted precisely).

We then learn that the dispute concerns only the AGE of the SON, not the lewdness of the foul mother: "All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and one day is a real connection whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2) So that if he was nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is invalidated from the priesthood, whilst if he was less than eight, Beth Shammai agree that she is not—their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old"—And here silliness reigns supreme, and one understands why Christ called the Pharisees "fools and blind":

"Beth Shammai maintaining. We must base our ruling on the earlier generations (3) when a boy of that age could cause conception—but Hillel hold that we do not". The supposition that boys became fathers at eight is the silly excuse for the Shammai school to argue that the boy must be under eight to leave the mother pure. The standard thruout the TALMUD is that the little boy becomes a person, "sexually mature" at nine years and one day—another asininity. And the whole argument strains at the gnat of age and swallows the camel of incest between mother and son.

With Relatives-"A Relaxed Membrum"

says the Book (Lev. 18:6). Scripture references are also cited which denounce a married woman who lies "carnally" with a man not her husband. But say the Sages: "THAT in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum-(13) Since no fertilization can possibly result. This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated". And the other Talmud sources are cited. "The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman (Footnote 15) Even though she died as a married woman". Thus one is "exonerated" for, or permitted, intercourse with dead relatives or with relatives, married or single, "with a relaxed membrum", "Since no fertilization can possibly result". And, altho Christ called the Pharisees "whited sepulchres. . .full of all uncleanness" (Matt. 23), yet His followers call the followers of the above, "God's Chosen People" and "People of the Book" in the best, instead of the abominator, sense!!

The above gem from Yebamoth 55b (Exh. 168) is echoed with some variation in "the chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud", the book of Sanhedrin (78a, Exh. 89, Introduction, Exh. 43). Intercourse with dead bodies was an old pagan practice.

There the act of sodomy with one suffering with an incurable disease, hence regarded as already dead a "terefah", is held to be merely "as one who abuses a dead person, and hence exempt". The explanation which continues on the next page (not reproduced) is: "punishment is generally imposed because of the forbidden (next page) pleasure derived—Whereas there is no sexual gratification in abusing the dead". Thus abuse of the dead is permitted because it does not give pleasure, so the pleasure is permitted! Christ knew His subject when He denounced Pharisaism!

Incest With Lot (Exh. 166)

The Bible tells us that after the destruction of Sodom with al! of its inhabitants, except Lot and his two daughters who took refuge in a cave: "the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us... Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose". The next night the same events took place for the younger: "Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father" (Genesis 19:31-8). The abominating tribes of Moabites and Ammonites were the products of these two sons, at first spared, then de-

molished by the fourth king of Judah, Jehosaphat (II Chron. 20). But the Pharisee "Sages" take anything but a critical view of such incest:

"A man should always be as alert as possible to perform a precept, for as a reward for anticipating the younger by one night, the elder daughter of Lot was privileged to appear in the genealogical record of the royal household of Israel four generations earlier". This is in Nazir 23b-24a, more of the same Talmudic "wisdom".

Nieces

The Jewish press in 1954 reported the attempts to alter state laws to legalize marriages between uncle and niece, which is common in rabbinical circles. This althouthe Bible prohibits marriages between uncles and aunts with nieces and nephews as incest, (Lev. 18:13 14).

Invocation

"A conjuring of evil spirits (b) an incantation used in conjuring" (Webester's New World Dictionary) INCANTATION:

The whole Jewish religion is a mass of such abracadabra directed at evil spirits as may be seen in the ritual for New Moon days, Tashlik, Habdalah, the use of amulets to drive off Lilith. See "DEMONOLOGY of the PHARISEES", "CABALA", and General Index herein. The Universal Jewish Ency. cities Joshus Trachtenberg's" Jewish Magic and Superstition" (1939) as a rabbinical authority on this subject.

JESUS

See under CHRIST and CHRISTIANS herein and General Index.

Jewish Community

Section on: JEWISH COMMUNAL REGISTER herein.

This 1597-page book was the report of the KEHILLA (Jewish Community) of New York City, 856 Second Ave., N.Y. City for 1917-18. Any idea that "Jews", so-called, are primarily citizens of the country in which they live is a delusion.

The structure of this inner world government covers three volumes totaling 1312 pages, issued by the Jewish Publication Society of America in 1948. And 348 pages of this are devoted to listing books on the subject "THE JEWISH COMMUNITY—Its History and Structure to the American Revolution", is the title, by Rabbi Salo Wittmayer Baron, Jur. D., Ph.D., Pol. Sc. D., Prof. of Jewish History, on the Miller Foundation, Columbia University.

Sadism, Conspiracy, and Control

Typical sedistic Talmudic thirst is shown in the

descriptions of rabbinical floggings in and outside the synagogues (Vol. 2, p. 224-); the mutilations, blindings and horrors visted upon the "moserim" or Jewish informers who squealed about the real doctrines of Talmudism to in ended victims (p. 222-, same); the practice of child marriage and polygamy, countenanced now as formerly wherever it will not embarass Jewry with the laws of the land (p. 310, etc.); the use of cemeteries for invocation of the dead (necromancy) (p. 154, same); the ferocious burials of "moserim" or informers (p. 156).

Light is thrown on the Jewish Cromwell conspiracy "and of the continued need of secrecy. . .the precariousness of their new institution" (the inner government in England, p. 275, Vol. 1), althouthe "Life of Menasseh Ben Israel" by Cecil Roth (Jewish Pub. Soc. of Am., 1945) is far more detailed and explicit.

As in all other Talmudic source books, the surging Gnostic Cabalism, or satanic and forbidden occultism of Talmudism, is portrayed in the three-volume" "The Jewish Community" (same, p. 354-).

These Photostats on Jewish Power

The Jewish Communal Register, of which photostats appear in THE PLOT, however, concerns itself largely with the political structure of the New York Kehilla, in which world control of Jewry is centered. The AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE is the most powerful single body in world Jewry. Its membership then and now embraces world Jewish capitalists and moving powers.

THE AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS, then being organized, does yoeman work thru its organization in some 65 countries. In all the world, Jewish organization is such that a bell rung by the New York American Jewish Committee functions right down to the Jew who had his toe stepped on in Borneo or Siam. His government is pressured, bullied or bought, until predatory Jewry is again in a position to re-start its climb to world dictatorship, world power, a world Anti-Christ totalitarian ruler.

Title Page

Jewish Immigration, Exh. 211

Jewish immigration, then as now, was "mainly from Russia, Poland . . . ", etc. These Jews, as will be discovered by reading up on the CHAZARS (Jewish Ency.) were part of an Asiatic horde, part of whom adopted Talmudism when their King Bulan and his court did so in the 8th century. Other Chazars who settled in Hungary adopted Christianity and are among the most advanced and civilized of Christians.

Kehilla Executive Committee, Exh. 212-3

A book could be written about the names on these ruling Kehilla committees: LOUIS MARSHALL, who broug it Henry Ford to his knees when he was printing the truth about Jewry in his Dearborn Independent, until now the whole Ford family on the hour as it were, knock their heads to the ground murmuring "Salaam!" and are lifted up watchfully and given Jewish "AWARDS" at frequent intervals. Marshall's son James, runs the N.Y. school board; another son, George, runs the Communist-aiding Marshall Foundation of a third son, Robert, who served Ickes in the Forestry Division of the Interior Dept. until his death.

Kuhn Loeb and Co. and the Am. Jewish Com.

Solidly intermarried, as is the Rothschild banking family custom, we see that in 1939 Max Warburg of the Hamburg, Germany bankers appears on the American Jewish Committee's "Institute on Peace and Post-War Problems", set up with a ponderous staff and full equipment to go forward, as it did, to write and move the United Nations Charter into being. This was before the USA entered World War II. Their propaganda agencies were picked and ready. We see FELIX M. WARBURG, brother of MAX, on the 1917-18 Kehillah. He was married to Frieda Schiff, daughter of the head of his Kuhn Loeb firm, Jacob Schiff. Then we see his son, FREDERICK M. WARBURG, a part of whose vast string of banking and rail power is listed in Who's Who in American Jewry (1938-9) as member of the American Jewish Committee, while his Hamburg relative. MAX WARBURG, who came here in 1939, serves on its "Post-war" Committee, as shown in the report of the American Jewish Committee in its American Jewish Year Book (Vol. 43, 1941-42, pp 751, 762). Max was also a member with Felix of the American Jewish Committee, as shown on the latter page. Then with them are the other powers running Ike's administration (Sidney Weinberg, banker, etc., etc.). The Big-Shots are all there.

One finds innocents taken in by the pose of the AMERICAN COUNCIL ON JUDAISM which propagandizes the bunk that Judaism is merely a religion, opposed to Zionism. The truth is the religion of Judaism is that Jewish NATIONALISM is world INTERNATIONALISM, a world run by the "humans" with the "asses" under their control. That IS Judaism. And there are William and Lessing I. Rosenwald (who

heads the "anti-Zionist" outfit) sitting on the American Jewish Committee with the Zionist, Rabbinical tycoons, all cooperating for the same Anti-Christ World Government, now so successfully rising.

Back to 1917-18, Exh. 212

There sat Rabbi Judah L. Magnes, protege of Jacob Schiff, as chairman of the Kehilla's Executive Committee. He ran the seditious People's Council (to set up Soviets here) during World War I, maneuvered the American Civil Liberties Union on which he served, and likewise the communist Garland Fund, and went over to head the Hebrew Univ. in Palestine. Earl Browder, Wm. Z. Foster were among his non-Talmudic Communist stooges, working the Communist end of world remodeling for Jewry.

Note his financing of "SOCIAL ECONOMICS" at Columbia U., "the germ of the Nation". Note that he "financed the enemies of autocratic Russia" to the acclaim of world Jewry. By following thru the STATE DEPARTMENT Papers, herein, it may be seen how bloody TROTSKY and LENIN were armed to clean up the job initiated by the Jewish agent KERENSKY—which put Russia under sadistic totalitarian enslavement to date, as more countries follow, under other lying propaganda barrages, and more Christians are tortured and worked sadistically and deliberately to death in concentration camps, under the whip of the "synagogue of Satan" and their proselytes, without exception, everywhere, always. Any other story is a studied, deliberate lie, all "anti-Communist" servants of Jewry to the contrary notwithstanding.

Jewish Nationalism is Internationalism Exh 216-7

Socialism is merely the clover held in front of the cow's nose to get her into the barn under the milking machine. It is a mechanism whereby a "human" can lead a whole herd into the Jewish barn. And, as the Russian "Jews" swept to this land, they set up Socialist organizations as in Russia, everywhere. Look at the current letterheads and directing personnel of these outfits, the Socialist Party of the renegade Christian, Norman Thomas. He provides the white collar for a mass of organizing skull caps and sidecurled Eastern Yids. The Communist Party, whose headquarters close on Jewish holidays, the Socialist Workers Party, the Social Democratic Federation—that companion "anti Stalinist" outfit to the "Freeman" magazine, "Human Events", various Jew-controlled "Freedom" outfits—they all reveal the same facade and same backroom

direction which provides the "clover" for the "cows' and "asses".

Zionism, Socialism, Exh. 218-9

In 1905, you may note, a Russia "free" for Talmudic aims, was held to be "quite sufficient" without a special Anti-Christ capitol in either Uganda or Palestine. And that, between the Talmudic Red revolutions of 1905 and 1917, was achieved.

Tribute is paid to a socialist leader (B. Boruchov) who trumpeted Zionism as a Socialist "theory which was necessarily very popular among the Jewish masses, who were at that time Socialistic through and through". And, as the vote in "Israel" in 1955 shows, they still are "Socialistic through and through". Continuing from Exh. 218 on to 219:

"Zionism thus received a Marxist basis, and appealed strongly to the masses." We see the organizations of the "Social Democratic Zionist Party Poale-Zion," by Socialist Borochov and Ben-Zwi; a great Russian general strike (always part of Zionist strategy); the organization of revolutionary red journals and:

"At the same time that the party was organized in Russia, sister societies were organized in America, in England, and, finally, in Palestine".

"Poale Zion", which means "Workers of Zion", which formed a world organization and affiliated with "Zeire Zion", became the strongest element in the Palestine "Histadruth" (giant cooperatives of unions, properties, industries, bus lines, banks, etc., on USSR lines), controlling 70% of its votes (Universal Jewish Ency., "Poale-Zion").

Poale Zion, like the rest of the Palestine Socialist parties, is part of the World Zionist Organization, maneuvering the world for Anti-Christ Zionist aims.

World Influence of Socialist-Zionism, Exh. 220-3

See how Samuel Gompers, product of the socialist Jewish English ghetto, worked the American Federation of Labor. Stemming from POALE-ZION we see not only the nationwide string of Marxist Jewish schools which, first in Yiddish, later led into the universities, where Marxism and its Talmudic aims and philosophy have taken over the minds of American youth and trained the totalitarian officials of our Tweedledum-Tweedledee administrations (Exh.222).

The Kitchen Where It Cooks, Exh. 222-

"Poale-Zionism" we read "is a party not for Palestine alone, but also for the Golus" (all Jews everywhere in so-called dispersion) "and its interests. For this reason, Paole-Zionism is the center of the East Side" (of New York) "from which come forth almost all Jewish American movements, or without which no movement can prosper."

And, continuing: "The Poale-Zion created the (Jewish) Congress movement. . ." And the participation by the millionaire Jewish Kehillah of N. Y. is cited:

"The Poale-Zion have made their best record in the Congress movement, where they forced the whole Jewish laboring class on the one hand, and the Zionists on the other hand, as well as the better-to-do elements, to participate."

Am. Jewish Congress-Kerensky, (Exh. 224)

"During the Congress movement" (Note: steered by Red Rabbi S. S. Wise who crowed over the Red Russian Revolution as the greatest feat of "the sons and daughters of Israel" (N. Y. Times, 3/24/17), continues the above, "they united all of the national radical elements in the National Socialist Workmen's Committee. . They found a capable worker in P." (Pinchas)" "Rutenberg, the well known Socialist Revolutionary" (Note: in Russia) "who later became the right hand of A. F. Kerensky in the position of Vice-Commandant of the Petrograd Military District".

Kerensky's Soviet

Pinchas Rutenberg, a Russian-Jewish industrialist, was chosen in 1937 as one of the 120 leading Jews of the world, along with Litvinov (Finklestein), Soviet Commissar, and Rabbi Louis Finklestein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of Am. (see his PHARI-SEES, Exh. 1-3), etc. He died in Palestine in 1942, much mourned, having set up the Palestine Electric Corp, using huge water rights under British protection for the benefit of Jewry.

Kerensky is still running around Socialist circles in New York where he retired to live graciously after doing his bit in the Russian Red Revolution. To quote: "alongside of the provisional government headed first by Prince Lvoff, the Socialist and Anarchist elements of Petrograd's population established a SOVIET of Soldiers', Workmen's and Sailors' Deputies . . . Its president at first was Tcheidze and its vice-president KERENSKY" (Kerensky was leader of the Socialist Social Revolutionary Party).

"In May, 1917, the SOVIET" (Kerensky's) "forced the resignation of the first cabinet . . . . Kerensky who succeeded Prince Lvoff, proved to be a weak and vacillating character" (N. Y. State Com. Investigating Seditious Activities, Vol. 1, p. 218, headed by Sen. Clayton R. Lusk, 1920).

The reason why Kerensky was so conveniently "weak and vacillating" was not because he did not know about the Lenin-Trotsky revolution financed by the Kuhn Loeb cabal which was to follow his activities. The STATE DEPARTMENT papers, herein, show that he knew every move in advance and said nothing about them. Not reproduced is Kerensky's departure as the Bolsheviks came in to take over, greeting them and keeping up illusory reports of his whereabouts, here and there, supposedly fighting the Bolsheviks, until his pleasant retirement became public in New York.

The Red wrecking work of Kerensky is described in part as follows in the above N. Y. State Lusk Report: "The liberal decrees of the Provisional a Government had destroyed the discipline of the army and the disintegration of the once powerful Russian military machine became complete" (p. 219). Kerensky's Social Democrats "distributed hundreds of thousands of leaflets among Russian soldiers" urging "that the soldiers should disobey their officers and lay down their arms" (p. 215). The "swift success" of this Revolution was "attributed in large measure by LENIN to a fortuitous cooperation between contending groups and factions" (p. 217 of same).

Poale Zion Today, Exh. 225-6

The chain of Red schools, the "more than one hundred societies in the National Workers' Alliance, which cooperates with Poale Zion", reported in 1917-18, even then summed up to this: "All of this constitutes a strong National-Socialist" (meaning a Jewish national-Socialist) "movement in America under the spiritual leadership of Poale Zion" (Exh. 225). And the avowed purpose:

"PURPOSE: . . . the establishment of a socialistic commonwealth . . . the education of the Jewish masses in America . . ."

The Universal Jewish Ency. (1943) reports under "Poale Zion", its formation in 1897; its founding of the "Jewish legion that fought on the side of the Allied army in Egypt and Palestine . . . a Yiddish weekly, Yiddisher Kampfer, and a monthly, The Jewish Frontier" (supporter of the Histadruth in Palestine, a Socialist combination of industry and labor on Soviet lines); and its prominent place in the Zionist World Organization. Its string of Marxist schools have done their work and are continuing to do it. The Jewish Workmen's Circle was teaching 10,000 children Marxism at last report. A Paole Zion Palestine party in the above 1943 report was called Ahduth Haabodah, also spelled in the Zionist Palestine Year Book (1946, p.

While there is changing and realigning, the Marxist composition of Israel remains. "Left Poale Zion" and Ahdut Avodah formed in part the MAPAM party: "Its socialistic outlook is similar to that of the Third International" (Note: of Moscow) "but was not permitted to affiliate with it". These Marxist parties comprise 92% of the Histadruth vote, says the same (p. 355). And the Histadruth is the dominant thing in Israel, aside from the Jewish-American corporations which own and run the place and take care of the political, financial world affairs which promote it. The 1955 vote for Knesset (parliament) members in Israel is reported as follows:

MAPAI, 40; MAPAI-affiliated Arab parties, 4; HERUT, 16; GENERAL ZIONISTS, 14; RELIGIOUS FRONT" (Mizrachi, Hapoel Hamizrachi) 12; AGU-DAH, 6; ACHDUTH AVODAH, 10; MAPAM, 8; PROGRESSIVES, 5; and COMMUNISTS, 5" (Jewish Voice, 8/12/55). And what are these parties, in brief? Says the Palestine Yearbook, 1946, p. 354:

"MAPAI is a Zionist Socialist party . . . From its inception Mapai has been affiliated with the Second (Brussels) International." To this Lenin, etc.' belonged in fact most world Red parties, until Moscow formed its own little vintage, called the Third International, a combine of Marxist parties formed in 1919.

MAPAM, which tried to join the Moscow International, being formed by Poale Zion, but was not permitted because of minor stipulations, the above Sternist paper said it: "generally has a line of policy similarly to Irgun and the FIGHTERS FOR FREEDOM. It stands for close cooperation with the Soviets . . . A little publicized fact is that Soviet arms have now been issued to all Israel troops . . . Recent Hebrew victories have been won with Soviet guns" ("Jerusalem Calling", organ of the Sternist, now HERUT, Fighters for Freedom, 9/3/48, 149 Second Ave., N. Y. 3).

AHDUT, or ACDUTH, or Leachduth, AVODAH, as before stated, is a Socialist party, a party dedicated

in other words, to subjugating all classes to one rule, the Iewish State "humans".

The RELIGIOUS FRONT—Mizrachi and Hapoel Hamizrachi, and the even more fanatical AGUDAH parties are Talmudic parties, most fanatically dedicated to the achievement of the anti-Christian, immoral, anti-human world power aims of the Babylonian Talmud, their Pharisee religion. The difference between Communist tactics and Talmudic tactics is that one is political and deceptive, the other inspires and is the dynamic of these tactics. One practices what the other teaches. Communism is Talmudism in action.

The COMMUNIST PARTY is merely the arm attached to the Moscow branch of Talmudic imperialism

The GENERAL ZIONISTS are different only in their stress upon certain policies best calculated in the minds of the Big Shots to achieve Talmudic world aims. As for any imagined "conservatism", the leaders of the General Zionists, according to the Palestine Year Book, 1946, issued by the Zionist Organization of America, the ruling heads of the World Zionist Organization, were: red Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver, Louis Lipsky, Nahum Goldmann (p. 357).

WISE, SILVER, GOLDMANN, LIPSKY, were all included in the 120 top Jews of the world chosen by the world kehillas in 1937, along with Commissar Litvinov (Finklestein) of Russia, Rabbi Louis Finklestein (See his "Pharisees "herein), Felix Frankfurter, etc.

WISE was a founder of the American Jewish Congress and its president from 1924 on. He was committeeman of the Communist-aiding American Civil Liberties Union, communist American Lg. Against War and Fascism, before and after its change of name to Am. Lg. for Peace and Democracy, with Earl Browder as its nat vice-chmn., and the Party leaders as officials. He "committeed" for the anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti, for the Communist dynamiter Tom Mooney, for the Nat. Religion and Labor Foundation, featuring Atheist Soviet Cartoons and distributing "Toward Soviet America" by Communist Wm. Z. Foster. He ardently backed the Communist burners of Spanish Christian churches, in accordance with the insane Tal-

mudic anti-Christ hatred of the creed he rabbied, as shown by the Party's Daily Worker 11/5/38, 1/30/39 2/15/39 etc., etc. His American Jewish Congress greeted, and he spoke for the above American Lg. for Peace and Democracy whose offical program was the incitation of mutiny and sabotage within the armed forces to turn any war of the USA into a Red Revolution and hoist the Red Flag here. Notes pledging this treason were read from Communist members of the armed forces at their Congress in Chicago which I attended.

Rabbi Wise, Schiff and the Revolution

To his dying day, Rabbi Wise never waned in his enthusiasm for the Soviet slave state, the murderer of so many millions of Christians. When the Big Shots of Jewry deemed it wise to create the bogey of Russia as the new enemy and cause for arming the entire world, with our boys drafted to serve on 300 world bases, he refused to accept the switch in strategic line, as reported in his eulogistic memorial tribute.

Wise hailed the first World War to plant Jewry's world base in Russia and gloated over the Red Revolution financed by the big Jew bankers. The New York Times report of the great Carnegie Hall celebration of the Russian Revolution, 3/24/17, is sub-titled:

"Rabbi Wise Ready for War-RELATES HOW JACOB H. SCHIFF FINANCED REVOLUTION PROPAGANDA IN CZAR'S ARMY".

But this financing of Russian Red Revolution had started long beforehand, to quote: "An authority on Russian affairs, George Kennan, told of a movement by the Society of the Friends of Russian Freedom financed by Jacob H. Schiff, had at the time of the Russo-Japanese war spread among 50,000 Russian officers and men in Japanese prison camps the gospel of the Russian revolutionists . . . "The movement was financed by a New York banker you all know and love", he said, referring to Mr. Schiff, 'and soon we received a ton and a half of Russian revolutionary propaganda. At the end of the war 50,000 Russian officers and men went back to their country ardent revolutionists!" . . .

"Mr. Parsons then arose and said: 'I will now read a message from White Sulphur Springs sent by the gentleman to whom Mr. Kennan referred.' This was the message:

"Will you say for me to those present at tonight's meeting how deeply I regret my inability to celebrate with the Friends of Russian Freedom the actual reward of what we had hoped and striven for these long years. . . '" This was followed by pious hopes that a "proper government and a constitution which shall permanently assure to the Russian people . . . happiness and peace," and the signature:

"JACOB H. SCHIFF

We know what Schiff meant by a "proper government," Talmudically speaking, and Schiff financed the Talmudic Jewish Theological Seminary, etc., to teach Talmudic aims.

Wise in Carnegie Hall, 1917

Not only are the agent connections of Schiff with the Japanese war against Russia hailed in his Kehillah sketch (Exh. 214) and his agent tics chronicled elsewhere in aid of every phase of the Talmudic plan, his own words bear witness to his deeds.

At the Carnegie Hall celebration reported above, Rabbi Wise spoke and, to quote: "then the rabbi praised the Russian revolution . . . 'I cannot forget,'

American Jewish Vear Book Mourns

"He was a founder of the AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS... He was the moving spirit and president of the World Jewish Congress from its organization in 1936 to his death... in 1897, as a organizer and secretary of the Federation of American Zionists, Stephen Wise ushered in a career of leadership in Zionism which brought him many high offices in the movement in America and throughout the world... more than any other American he was the outstanding symbol and advocate of Zionism, not only in the eyes of American Jews but also to the entire American people and its leaders, including Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt."

He Champions Soviet to Last

This is but a small part of the tribute paid Red Rabbi Wise by the rich "conservative" American Jewish Committee in its 1950 Year Book: "Toward the end of his life Rabbi Wise was greatly disturbed about the foreign policy of the United States, which he felt was leading toward war with the Soviet Union . . . The last addresses he delivered in the weeks before his death were highlighted by attacks on those forces which he maintained were pushing his country toward war with Russia and which, he claimed, were attempting to suppress him. I will not be silenced! were the last words this writer heard Rabbi Wise speak publicly, and they were most typical . . ." This rhapsody closes with fervent praises, and chronicles the fact that Wise had amalgamated his Jewish Institute of Religion in New York, which trains rabbis, with Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati, Ohio, whose founder and head until his death, Rabbi Isaac M. Wise, edited the first English translation of the BABYLONIAN TALMUD (Boston, 1903) known as the Rodkinson translation. Isaac had introduced so-called "Reform" Judaism into this country from Germany. Rabbi S. S. Wise was Hungarian-born.

Rabbi Wise was a "character witness" for the Talmud and Jewish defendants in our libel suit against the Chicago Jewish Sentinel. In his testimony he ackCOMMENTARÝ

nowledged the SONCINO English translation of the Talmud and its Chief Rabbi Hertz endorser, by exclaiming irately: "He is my friend! I know it; I have it and I USE it!" His mouth twitched with anger under questioning about his Red affiliations and activites. The Jewish Sentinel settled with me in cash at my attorney's office, Dilling and Dilling, and declared in massmeetings to "fight the mamzer Dilling" ("bastard") that my Talmud testimony has been the set-back of a decade; that I had dragged their "sacred Talmud" in the sewer. It I had done so it might have cleaned it up; a mere sewer is a useful and normal channel for cleaning; the Talmud is an abnormal, diabolical channel for funneling sub-sewage into the minds of those who follow it. The whole Talmudic religion would have to be revamped to bring it up to the level of a sewer, revamped and cleaned up to the point of legality. Its doctrines are illegal in all civilized countries. It stands for mass murder of non-Jews, mass enslavement of mankind, the reversal of all laws based upon Old and New Testament morality.

The AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE. Exh. 227-32; 234-36

Note in Exhibit 235-6, the powerful capitalistic Jews functioning on the all-powerful arbiter of world Jewry, the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE.

LOUIS MARSHALL was then (1917-18) president of it. It was he who served notice upon Henry Ford that he must cease telling the truth about the Talmudic cabal or ELSE. According to the man perhaps most close to Henry Ford, Sr., high in the administration of his affairs, it was the attempt to assassinate Ford by driving his car off the road which caused Mrs. Ford to plead with Henry to cease his exposures of Talmudism thru his Dearborn Independent, as he told me. All the kowtowing now being done by the Ford family to "the synagogue of Satan" is but a repetition of what Ford exposed in his paper. One article on how President Taft was brought to his knees, refused a second term, then decorated by B'nai B'rith and given a professorship at Yale—then addressed B'nai B'rith audiences and wrote internationalist propaganda until his death—is almost a replica of the job done on the Fords.

The Marshall Fruit

The Marshalls have worked all sides of the street for Talmudic rule: the capitalistic, the educational, the Red revolutionary, the legal, the Jewnited Nations.

SON JAMES, son of Louis, has headed the New York City school board and a string of Jewish communal organizations, and as member of the law firm of Marshall, Bratter and Seligson lists himself as director

In Who's Who in America, 1954-5:

James boasts of arguing the Texas primary and first Area Zoning cases for the NAACP, going to the Supreme Court. He lists his positions as delegate and commission member for the USA of UNESCO, and as advisor to the US Commissions of UNESCO at Paris Mexico City, etc. The AMERICAN BAR ASSN., and a string of other legal affiliations, get the boy around. And his writings, characteristically, as he works for regimented education, as Vice-President of the Am. Assn. for an International Office of Education, include: "The Freedom to be Free". For "Freedom", a Talmudic current saw, read "regimentation". Wherever "democracy" or "freedom" is prated, look for the Talmudic hand in the woodpile, throwing these goodies at the kiddies to keep them occupied while the stockade is being built for them.

Brother ROBERT, son of LOUIS, SR., as head of the New Deal Forestry Division of the Interior Department, died, leaving a fat fortune to be spent for Marxian purposes, in the ROBERT MARSHALL FOUNDATION. Its benefits to every phase of Communistic activity are chronicled by the Dies Committee reports (Vol. 17, 1944-Section 1-6, etc.). This outfit is run by another of Louis' sons:

GEORGE: "George Marshall's Communist record is so clear and so voluminous that it leaves no doubt about his ideological devotion to the Soviet Union and the revolution upon which that government is based." GEORGE has 29 Communistic listings in the index of this Dies Report, all backed by documentary evidence, as usual,

Exhibit 235

duced, being "Chairman of the Board of Directors and of the Executive Committee of the JEWISH THEO-LOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA", etc., etc., he earned his outstanding position. Rabbi Louis Finklestein, along with Soviet Commissar Litvinov (Finklestein) was honored in 1937 by world Jewry for their accomplishments for the clan and the Rabbi has for some time headed the Talmudic Jewish Theological Seminary which Louis Marshall steered in his time. See Exh. 235-6, pp. 1426-7 of the Kehillah document. There, you may note on the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE, Rabbi Judah L. Magnes of the Communist Garland Fund, Soviet-establishing Peoples' Councils, etc., the protege of Jacob H. Schiff, head of Kuhn Loeh & Co.

There is Cyrus L. Sulzberger, father of Arthur Hays Sulzberger, New York Times tycoon. There is Herbert H. Lehman, N. Y. Governor, Senator, and head of UNRRA, the international hand-out agency notorious for its aid of every phase of Jewish power. There is Adolph Lewisohn, mining and N. Y. Stock Exchange executive financier, whose infiltration into the Young Men's CHRISTIAN Assn., along with his anti-Christian Talmudic activities, speaks for itself.

There is Leon Moisseiff who came here from Russia in 1891, went back to the USSR in 1929 to be Commissar of transportation. His presidency of the Russian Assn. of Engineers, 1927-32, is cited in Who's Who in Am. Jewry, 1938-9; also his designing of USA bridges. These included the Tacoma bridge which was called "Galloping Gertie" before it collapsed. There is Eugene Meyer, Jr. of Lazard Freres international bankers, Federal Reserve Bd.; Baruch World War crowd; Washington Post, etc.

There is Jacob Wertheim, father of Maurice, investment banker, industrialist of wide power, director of the revolutionary Socialist NATION magazine and of that center of Marxian propaganda and Talmudic-Freudian sex-filth, the NEW SCHOOL for SOCIAL RESEARCH in N. Y.

There is Oscar S. Straus, to whom the Universal Jewish Ency of 1943 devotes two full pages. This foreign-born Jew's maneuvers in the administrations of five presidents: Cleveland, Harrison, McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt and Taft; his running on the Progressive Party ticket (to split the Republican Party and elect Wilson); his activities in Turkey, the Phillipines; his negotiations with Theodore Herzl, father of modern Zionism; his appointment to the Theodore Roosevelt cabinet to a post created for him (Secy. of Labor, controlling immigration); his devotion to his Talmudic synagogue, are highlighted along with his representing the FEDERAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES of CHRIST in AMERICA in Palestine.

His is, indeed, a typical role of the American Jewish Committee conspirators for anti-Christ Talmudic world aims.

"'I have a very high estimate of your ability'". Pres. Teddy R. is quoted as saying to Straus when he told him he was putting him into a Cabinet position, the first American President to appoint a Jew to this honor and power: "'and I want you for personal reasons. There is a still further reason: I want to show Russia and some other countries what we think of Jews in this country'" (Univ. Jewish Ency., "Straus", p. 77).

Straus was presiding at the internationalist Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague, as his American Jewish Committee members today are presiding over its successor, the UNITED NATIONS, whose charter they wrote and prepared in every phase, and as Kuhn Loeb & Co.'s Lewis L. Strauss of the American Jewish Com. is heading the new instrument of world power—Atomic Energy, financed by the Jew-S.-A.

There is Felix M. Warburg and JACOB H. SCHIFF. This Kuhn Loeb & Co. banking family are intermarried with world Jewish banking like a woven rug, composed of the Lehman, Rothschild, world cabal of money and political power for Talmudism.

The Jewish Banking Clan

Out of the Frankfort-on-Main cradle of Rothschild Jewish bankers, came Jacob Schiff whose paternal home I visited. It has a common cellar and get-away under the former ghetto walls with the Rothschild family, with whom Schiff served in banking. The Red Shield (Rothschild) hung out the front of the narrow dwelling of the one, and the Ship sign (Schiff) out of its narrow companion house, each one but two rooms deep.

JACOB SCHIFF came to this country. He married Therese Loeb, daughter of the Kuhn Loeb founder. His daughter, FRIEDA, married FELIX M. WARBURG, Hamburg-born banker who headed the AGRO JOINT work for Jewry in Russia to keep them in power after the Red Revolution. He was with Kuhn Loeb & Co. from 1896. Their daughter Carola married Walter N. Rothschild. Edward M. M.; Frederick M. (with Lehman bankers then Kuhn Loeb partner who has infiltrated into the Boy Scouts) and Paul Felix (banker) have a wide range of industrial power, inherited from their Kuhn Loeb family.

James Paul WARBURG, son of Paul M. and Nina Jenny Loeb, states in his sketch in Who's Who in American Jewry: "paternal ancestors through 6 generations have been bankers as mem.'s of the banking house of M. M. Warburg & Co. founded in Hamburg

in 1798; maternal grandfather, Solomon, founder of the internat. banking house of Kuhn Loeb & Co. . Came to U.S. 1902 . . . " and a column of his banking and international financial connections follow.

The Hamburgers Take a Hand Here

And thru the State Department Papers you may note the role played by the M. M. Warburg banking firm in financing the Red Russian Revolution. And when Max Warburg came here from Hamburg in 1939, the American Jewish Committee placed him on its "Post-War" committee for the reorganization of the world which, in turn, set up the propaganda claque for the UNITED NATIONS, with its own "Institute" turning out the material for nationwide papers and periodicals, using a chain of organizations to popularize this world dictatorship scheme of theirs.

And so these Kuhn Loeb "princes of Jewry" remold the world a second time in our generation toward the aim of the ages—world Jewish dictatorship, now almost here, ready for its complete and eternal fall, according to the Bible.

AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE—Exhs. 227-232 Or, "While You Slept"—They Worked

"NATURALIZATION LAWS—The Committee also opposed with success the passage of legislation . . . to deprive 'ASIATICS' of . . . naturalization because it was believed that such laws would deprive Jews coming from ASIA of the right to become citizens."

"SCHECHITAH," which is the merciless Talmudic method of slaughtering animals by slitting their throats from ear to ear and letting them slowly die in needless pain. Humane societies which have investigated have been up in arms in all countries at this sadism insisted upon in the name of the religion of the "synagogue of Satan." When "organized propaganda . . . against the practice of Schechitah" menaced this Talmudic love, "the Committee combatted this movement energetically and successfully."

Exhibit 228

1909) "and who had sought, or might seek, an asylum in this country." They won. So we got them all HERE.

RITUAL MURDER, Exh. 228

Until the Pharisee line changed for strategic purposes recently, "Red-baiting and witch-hunting" were twin terms of ridicule indicating that of course there were no Reds, and no "witches" (or dealers with the occult powers). Now, Reds do exist.

These "Christian divines" whom the AJC inspired to protest to Russia, the "leading Christian divines of America . . . disavowed their belief in the atrocious charge."

A reading of "Superstition" in the Universal Jewish Ency. will give a glimpse of occult practices of Judaism continuing today, foul practices such as "to fig," Kapporah, etc., and it will be seen that Rabbi Joshua Trachtenberg is cited as an authority in his "Jewish Magic and Superstition." In it he seeks to erase the Ritual Murder charges of the centuries, "the constant recurrence of child sacrifice in these trials and the importance of human blood in the witches' ritual . . . the most distinguishing elements in the technique of the sorcerer and the witch, as disclosed to popular view by the campaign of the Church" (p. 9). He admits a few pages later:

"The sources indicate that Jews were at least acquainted with methods of inducing disease and death, of arousing and killing passion, of forcing people to do their bidding" (Note: the late Dr. Dekker told me he was a member of the same occult group with Earl Browder when he was in the Communist movement, for the purpose of "influencing individuals.") "of employing demons for divinatory and other purposes... We find accounts of the magician's power to project his soul to far-distant places, there to perform an errand, and then return to his comatose body" (p. 13)

JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA ON

The 1905 Jewish Ency. elaborately denies the "Blood Accusation," dating from the time of Pharisee historian Josephus of the first century. To quote, however:

"Of the alarmingly large number of ritual trials only a few of the more important and instructive can be

Says the 1905 Jewish Ency.: "It may be positively asserted that there is no Jewish ritual which prescribes the use of the blood of any human being. Were there such a ritual . . . there would certainly be some reference to it in the colossal mass of halakic literature . . ." And "halackic" means legal, like the MISHNA in large type on the Talmud pages reproduced in the PLOT. The Mishnaim are what you can and cannot do. The GEMARA is the hashing of the Pharisee "sages" about it. The "haggadah" are the big lies for the love of big lies such as God splashing around playing with the leviathin in the sea, breaking eggs that cover several countries, teaching unborn children Torah (or Talmud manglings of the Scriptures) part of the day, while Metatron, the sun god, teaches them the rest of the time and they forget it all when born. One might call the HAGGADAH lying for the fun of it. It is distinguished from Halachah, or legal stuff.

Blood Use Not in Halachah (halakah)

No one has accused Judaism of carrying all the bloody business of its demonism in the haggadah OR halachah. It belongs in the "Practical Cabala" the "theurgic" or wonderworking business, the manuscripts for which are copied hand to hand. Occasionally one is printed in occult works. Blood, blood, blood is thru it all. "RITUAL MAGIC" is a good complement to Trachtenberg's "Jewish Magic and Superstition" (Behrman's Jewish Book House, Publishers, N.Y., 1939). "Ritual Magic" which contains much material and some bloody manuscripts, is by E. M. Butler, Prof. at Cambridge University and it was published by the University Press, 1949.

Right in the SHULCHAN ARUCH (distilled laws of the Talmud) you will find the ritual handwashing stemming from the Talmud in conjunction with Pharisee demonology. The whole Bible is full of the bloody business of pagan demonology: Baal worship with its self-cutting with knives; Molech worship with child sacrifice, both condoned or permitted by the modern BABYLONIAN TALMUD as shown herein. Every form of ancient paganism decried by the Bible may be found under the whited sepulchre of so-called "Judaism," Pharisee paganism. The "Christian divines," now, as then, in 1912, would do well to read up on what the Bible is yelling against and find it has NOT dis-

The Bible acknowledges the existence of evil spirits and warns us not to use them. Even Buddha wrote:

"It is because I see this peril in the marvel of psychic power that I am distressed by it, that I abhor it, that I loathe it." Christ drove out evil spirits, possessing souls.

Exhibits 228-29, More Immigration Work

No corner of the earth is too remote to manipulate for Jewry. We note in Exh. 228: "The Jews in the Balkans." And so our government was used again to pressure for Jewish power. Exh. 229 shows how restriction of immigration from Russia was fought so that the flow of revolutionaries might not be curbed.

The cry of "Persecution," as always, is used to cover the crimes of the only people on earth whose very religion teaches them that murder and enslavement and cheating of all other peoples is a sacred right. The LITERACY TEST is fought so that illiterate Jews might swarm here—as they did. Of three literacy test bills, we are told, President Taft vetoed one and President Wilson two under the pressure of the American Jewish Committee. And then when one of them was passed, despite the veto, the AJC "succeeded in procuring adoption of a clause which excluded . . . those who came to this country to avoid religious persecution, whether induced by overt acts, by oppressive laws, or by governmental relations." And so at every stage of the game of take-over for Talmudism, the United States was used as a base of operations for "the synagogue of Satan" to put Christian Russia under heel. Propaganda flooded this country which inculcated those of my vintage with the conviction that the weak Czar with his outnumbered outfinanced foes, wielded a blacksnake whip over little praying angel Jews, being made to suffer just because they are "People of the Book." We were taught that to the tune of AJC millions of dollars.

You have only to read such Jewish books as Dubnow's "History of the Jews of Russia and Poland," put out by the American Jewish Committee's Jewish Publication Society of Am. for its OWN PEOPLE, to see how every law was flouted as the Talmudists rose to assassinate and crowd their way into complete mastery and butchery in Russia.

JEWISH PASSPORTS, Exh. 230-232

We are told that the AJC considered it "one of its most important functions to bend every effort toward the solution of the PASSPORT question" (Exh. 230). This "solution" was to circumvent Russia which sought to bar Russian—born Red Jews, who came to the USA

to get citizenship in order to return to Russia as American citizens, from using their immunity to steer the Red Revolutionary overthrow of the Russian Christian government.

Russia had instructed its consuls to inquire of seekers for passports to enter Russia from the USA, and if they were Russian-born Jews, not to give them an entrance visa. For the USA was full of the jailbird revolutionaries wanted in Russia who thus sought to escape Russian laws as American citizens. The sole aim of the AJC was overthrow of the Russian government, and afterwards to sustain the butchers as they enslaved the Christian populace, as they did, for Talmudic world rule.

"The Jewish Faith"

Note the sanctimonious "Hearts and Flowers" pose of the AJC (Exh. 231) about Russia" refusing to recognize the American passport in the hands of AMERICAN citizens of the JEWISH FAITH." And what is that holy "FAITH?" A criminal conspiracy against all humanity, all civilized laws, all reciprocity, a code which makes that of the Capone gangsters seem benign, picayunish, in comparison with a baby-raping sewer, with apologies to the useful and beneficial sewer.

Exh 231-2 Schiff Puts the Works on Taff

The visit of ultimatum of the American Jewish Committee, headed by Jake Schiff, is dramatically covered by the Dearborn Independent article of Henry Ford entitled: "TAFT ONCE TRIED TO RESIST JEWS AND FAILED" (Dearborn Independent 1/15/21). To quote: "Mr. Taft once stood out against the Jews was strongly denounced as unfavorable to the Jews was soundly beaten by the Jews in a matter on which he had taken a firm stand, and has ever since shown that he has learned his lesson by accommodating the Jews in their desires . . .

"For centuries Russia has had her own troubles with the Jews and, as the world knows, has at last fallen prostrate before the Jewish power which for centuries has been working to undermine her . . . The biggest hoax in modern times was the propaganda against Russia as the persecutor of the Jews. Russia devoted to the Jews a large part of the most favored section of the land, and was always so lax in those laws which prohibited Jews from settling in other parts of the country that the Jew was able to create an underground system thruout the whole of Russia which controlled the grain trade, controlled public opinion, and utterly baffled the Czar's government. The cry of 'persecution' arose because the Jews were not permitted to exploit the peasants as much as they desired. They

have, however, gained that privilege since."

Reports of USA Ministers are quoted showing that while 1500 Jews were registered in St. Petersburgh with the police, 30,000 were operating there illegally. Jewish editors and writers wielded power on "the leading newspapers of St. Petersburgh and Moscow," and, as in the USA, the liquor trade was entirely in Jewish hands, according to Jewish authorities. "At every turn the United States Govt. discovered that the Jews were exaggerating their difficulties for the purpose of forcing governmental action . . . The Jews represented that their life in Russia was a hell . . . Presently, after years of underground work and open propaganda against Russia in the daily press, until the American conception of Russia was fixed almost beyond correction, the agitation took the form of the 'RUSSIAN PASSPORT QUESTION' . . . Jews demanded nothing less than that the United States break all treaty relations with Russia. They DEMANDED it."

Taft is TOLD

How JACOB SCHIFF, LOUIS MARSHALL, AD-OLPH KRAUSS and JUDGE HENRY M. FOGLE (executive committee members of the AJC) walked in on Taft at the White House, Feb. 15, 1911, is described. They had demanded the conference, were dined at the White House luncheon table, but Taft insisted upon reading them HIS conclusions that the trade treaty of 1832 with Russia should not be broken as an exceptional favor to Jews, despite his sentiments in favor of Jewry.

JACOB SCHIFF was enraged: "This means WAR!", he exclaimed: "On leaving the White House, Jacob Schiff refused to shake the President's hand, but brushed by it with an air of offended power . . . Neither did the President know what was behind it all . . . It meant that German Jews would be the intermediaries of trade between Russia and the United States" (if the treaty were broken) ". . .The Frankfort bankers and their relatives in the United States knew what that meant . . . the relation meant power over Russia—and JACOB SCHIFF LIVED TO OVERTHROW RUSSIA.

"When the Jewish ambassadors left the White House, orders flew from Washington and New York

to every part of the United States, and the Jewish 'nagging' drive began. It had a center in every city. It was focused on every Representative and Senator—no official, however, was too mean or unimportant to be drafted. American editors can remember the drive; it was operated on precisely the same lines as the one which is proceeding against the press today. The Jews have given absolute proof in the last two months that they control the majority of the American press . . .

"JACOB SCHIFF had said on Feb. 15, "This means War!" He had ordered a large sum of money used for that purpose . . . On December 13 of that same year—almost ten months to a day after Jewry had declared war on President Taft's conclusions—both houses of Congress ordered Pres. Taft to notify Russia that the treaty with Russia would be terminated. Frankfort-on-Main Had Won!"

Nine years later, at the writing of this article, it is noted that Taft is making speeches for the Jews after the "Jewish press of the United States berated Pres. Taft with Jewish unreserve. It would be an eye-opener if, at every speech which Wm. Howard Taft makes for his Jewish clients, there could be distributed copies of the remarks printed about Pres. Taft by those same Jewish clients nine years ago... Two governments had been beaten... and the glee with which Jewry hailed the event is also known." The fact that Taft was that strange phenomenon—a one-term President, is noted and the question raised that this might have been in consequence of his disobedience.

"The President had really done what he could to prevent the Jewish plan from going thru. On Feb. 11, 1911, he withstood them face to face. On Dec. 13, 1911, they whipped him. And yet, in the next year, 1912, a peculiar thing occurred; the high officials of the B'NAI B'RITH went to the White House and there pinned on the breast of Pres. Taft a medal which marked him as 'the man who had contributed most during the year to the welfare of the Jewish cause.' There is a photograph extant of Pres. Taft standing on the south portico of the White House, in the midst of a group of prominent Jews, and the president is wearing his medal. He is not smiling . . . .

"That is the story of Wm. Howard Taft's efforts to withstand the Jews, and how they broke him. It is probably worth knowing in view of the fact that he has become one of those 'Gentile fronts' which the Jews use for their own defense' (End).

Ford "Apologizes" to Jewry

The unqualified crawl, even the misstatement that he had been unaware of the contents of his Dearborn Independent, appeared over Henry Ford's signature, June 30, 1927, just about six-and-a-half years after this article appeared. The apology was addressed to LOU-IS MARSHALL as head of the American Jewish Committee. Yet Jewry never trusted Henry Ford. It was known that he repeatedly gave large sums of money to such "anti-Semites" as W. D. Pelley, Rev. Gerald Winrod, and my office received \$5,000 from him in 1939, a year when \$12,000 was spent in office research in my work, not to me, but to nine employees, etc., and his staff knew my ideas, well.

Before Fundamentalists All Kneeled

In vain did Jewry seek to bow the knee of Dr. James M. Gray, head of the Moody Bible Institute who refused to recant his assertions that the Protocols of Zion represent the program of Talmudic world Jewry. Concerning the Henry Ford apology, Dr. Gray wrote an article in the Moody Monthly of Sept. 1927 citing it and stating:

"This confession in our opinion is another link in the chain of prophecy. As we read it we were impressed that the great millionaire went further than the circumstances of the case required him to go. To put it another way, we do not believe the editor of the Independent, Mr. Ford's paper, was either as foolish or as wicked as the confession of its proprietor would make him appear. We believe he had good grounds for publishing some of the things about the Jews which he did publish. Indeed, the pressure brought to bear upon Mr. Ford to make his confession was in itself such corroborative evidence. This pressure came from the Jews all over the world, and in the face of it Mr. Ford was panic-stricken. He is one of the richest men in the world, and of course conscious of the power that money brings with it; but he was made to feel that the Jews have more money and hence more power than he, and that in such a cause their money and their power can be quickly mobilized against an opponent and with crushing consequences. . ."

I knew Dr. Gray. My RED NETWORK was sold in large quanities in the Moody Bookstore, and I spoke over the Moody radio and in the church, etc. Dr. Gray was undismayed by threats. His successor quieted down many matters in favor of Jewry and the Institute has been "blessed" by large buildings and financial solidity.

TREATIES and the AJC BOAST, Exh. 232

Unmentioned, unrealized, today, is the fact that under Article 6 of the Constitution a TREATY becomes the "supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby; anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary not-withstanding." At one gulp, thereby, all State laws as well as all of the Constitution may be legally nullified by a treaty. This has been done. The United Nations

Charter, ratified not merely as provided in Article 2 by two-thirds of the Senators PRESENT, but by a resounding proportion, almost 100% of the Senators, became as a TREATY the Supreme Law of the Land, anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. The Supreme Court desegregation decision was compulsory since "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby," says the Constitution gimmick. With the UN Charter the Supreme Law of this Land, State laws on segregation became null and void—in fact all State laws, all Constitutional rights.

The Canny AJC Knew This

That the top AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE was well aware of this provision of the Constitution back in 1917-18 when this report was issued, is evident from the text. The reciprocal trade treaty of 1832 had to be broken. It permitted Russia to have some say as to the USA crowd it must admit to its borders. It retained some sovereignty which Red Revolutionary Jewry from Russia, armed with American citizenship could not hurdle. The Jewish mob MUST be free to come here and return to put over the Jewish revolution. So, as the text states:

"The effect of the termination of the treaty, was the declaration of the national policy of the United States, that it would not tolerate further discrimination against American citizens" (!!)" of the JEWISH FAITH. Since treaties are, under the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, with the termination of the treaty there no longer exists a law which according to the Russian Government's contention was susceptible of the unconstitutional construction that our Govt. permitted discrimination . . . on account of race or RELIGION." Then follows the big VICTORY:

"The action of President Taft and of the Congress of the United States was subsequently approved by all the great political parties of the country, in the platforms adopted by them in 1912, and again in 1916." Then there follows the achievement of the first of the FEPC Talmudic laws aimed to force Christians to hire their enemics with the Negroes being used as a smoke-screen—they too being non-humans under Talmudic doctrine, and Christian Negroes ranking with the lowest hell-bound scum who, according to the Talmud, merit an eternity of "boiling excrement." Hell is reserved for Jesus, eternally plied with "boiling semen," and His followers covered with "boiling excrement." Of course, deportation for race mixing, and liquidation for the elimination of opposition to Talmudic despotism are the two main weapons of the Iron Curtain Talmudic dictatorships. A mixed, confused herd can be shot or jailed by the "masters" more easily. There

is no unity of action, no esprit de corps left

JEWRY, Like Its Religion, TOTALITARIAN Exhibits 233, 239-241

The NATIONAL WORKMEN'S COMMITTEE of 1915—nationwide Jewish Marxism;

The JEWISH PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE and JEW-ISH LABOR COMMITTEE, 18 years later and NOW (1955); a million radical JEWS and their delegates. What are they?

The National Workmen's Committee, says the Kehilla report (Exh. 233) "was organized in the early part of 1915, by representatives of the four leading radical organizations, viz.: The Workmen's Circle, the United Hebrew Trades, The Jewish Socialist Federation of America, and the Forward Association." Their global policy for Jewry follows. And, the collections taken by David Dubinsky's outfit for the Spanish Red Revolution, in which Jews from all over the world acted as "Political Commissars" like John Gates, carried this policy out, as did the World War II underground murderbund which liquidated French Christians by the thousands under the pretext that they were "collaborators" with the anti-Red "enemy." Israel Regenstreich, alias John Gates, was editor of the Communist Party's Daily Worker here. After his service to the Reds in Spain, his return passage, according to TIME magazine, 1/39, along with many other Reds, was paid for by that great "conservative," "unofficial President," and perpetual boss of presidents, Barney Baruch, who is called the "clder statesman" despite the fact that he has never been elected dog-catcher, even, by any American electorate. He put up \$10,000 to bring these anti-Christian Redshome here.

The FORWARD, in Yiddish, is still the largest Socialist paper in the world. I visited one of the fratornal insurance society headquarters and training schools of the WORKMEN'S CIRCLE where anarchist meetings are held and the long flowing whiskers of Karl Marx' big picture adorn the walls. Their schools reported teaching some 10,000 children Yiddish and Marxism in recent years. The UNITED HEBREW TRADES always sent delegates to the Socialist international conferences. These organized the 1915 outfit.

The 1915 Meeting, Exh. 233

"Over two hundred organizations were represented," the 18th of April, 1915, says this report, "Similar conferences were held in practically every important Jewish community all over the United States."—(Now skip to Exhibit 239, the continuation).

Note that their first convention, at a time when

there were supposedly only a small percentage of the Jews now in this country, then about 3 millions, that this Red convention represented "a total membership of half a million Jewish workmen." That is quite a large proportion of organized Marxists with one purpose in mind. They set out to propagandize the American people and the American Government—and DID.

The SOCIALIST TERRITORIALISTS cited on this page along with the POALE ZION PARTY were then wrangling over whether Yiddish was to be THE language. But they amalgamated.

And 19 Years Later

The organization of the JEWISH LABOR COM-MITTEE in 1934 is cited in the Universal Jewish Ency. (1943), in a sketch by its executive secretary. It represented a membership of half a million in 1942 and included David Dubinsky's Intl. Ladies Garment Workers' Union, Sidney Hillman's Amalgamated Clothing Workers, Max Zaritsky's United Hat, Cap and Millinery Worker's Union, "and 765 other labor organizations." The donation of a day or half-day's pay to underground activities abroad is covered. ADOLPH HELD, JOSEPH BASKIN, DAVID DUBINSKY, and the writer, JACOB PAT, are given as chmn., secy., treas., and exec. secy., respectively.

Rescuing Socialists during World War II was the noble work of this outfit: "In all, about 800 labor leaders and leading Socialists were brought to the United States or to safety in other countries," states the article. And to this underground fund, non-Jewish needleworkers who have written me HAD to contribute.

The millionaire banker AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE, and B'NAI B'RITH, and the JEWISH LABOR COMMITTEE formed a joint council with the Zionist radical AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS (A.P. 6/17/38) and have since been known as the "Big Four." Thus a solid phlanx of Talmudic power operates from the cap maker or his Jewish organizer thru to the top banking powers of Talmudism.

B'nai B'rith Compares 1915 With 1934

... To show the world that we have great armies of labor is a very good thing, but to have the same world note that these hosts are largely of radical frame of mind is something about which we have in the past been somewhat squeamish."

DUBINSKY, for example who was arrested repeatedly in Russia, and served 18 months in one prison, and was exiled to Siberia, escaped after 5 months and came to the USA (Am. Labor Who's Who, 1925).

ISRAEL WEINBERG, another worthy of the Jewish Labor Committee was "acquitted on one count of charge of murder in San Francisco preparedness day parade bomb explosion, 7/22/16, eight other indictments still pending" (same source). The San Francisco Preparedness Day bombing was the work of the Anarchist-Communist Tom Mooney and his cohorts. Mooney had been expelled from the Socialist branch of the Party for dynamiting. But world Communism made him a hero until his death. Unlike the prisoner, being described by another prisoner to his buddy, who asked: "Wat is he in fer?" "O, he cut his mudder's throat—but he's a good guy, he was sorry!"—Mooney remained proud of his murders, not "SORRY."

B'nai B'rith Gloats Again

On the same page (p. 329), B'nai B'rith gloated also about the convention of the Communist Party's JEWISH PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE, "with 1,000 delegates."

JEWISH LIFE Reports

The 1/38 issue of JEWISH LIFE magazine (published by the "N. Y. State Jewish Buro, Communist Party, 50 E. 13th St., N. Y. City"), reporting the con-

vention of the above JEWISH PEOPLE'S COMMIT-TEE, said:"

"Close to 1,000 delegates representing HALF-A-MILLION American Jews participated in the National Conference and anti-Polish Pogrom march on Washington under the auspices of the Jewish People's Committee... A spokesman for Jewish reaction, Dr. S. Margoshes, tried to pooh-pooh the whole conference by saying: 'About a thousand delegates, representing mostly Left and Communist-controlled Jewish organizations, assembled in Washington over the week-end." But the article goes on to say, "Half a million Jews constitute a significant cross section of American Jewry."

USA Jewry in Three Red Groups

The Jewish Stalinist Brigade

The Soviet Jews having been the first winners, naturally they have been tops in popularity with the Talmudists. The Socialist "JEWISH FRONTIER," supporter of the Palestine socialist Histadruth in this country, and leaning to Jerusalem instead of Moscow as the desired world capitol for Talmudic world government, made this family thrust in its 8/40 issue (p.23), when it referred to the Communist Party as the "Stalinist brigade which is also the Jewish brigade." It goes on to relate what any student of the Red movement knows in a short time, which is that Jewry predominates in all subversive anti-Christian Marxist movements (in accord with their religion of hatred toward Christianity and Christian civilization), only that this paper limits its observations to Stalinism, as Jewish. It observes:

"Four students of New York City College have been arrested on grounds of interfering with a student military parade on their campus" (Note: before the line changed to arming every young kid to send abroad to win and hold Jewish world power). "ALL FOUR ARE JEWS. The Communist press carries daily reports of 'pacifist' activities in other colleges. Whenever participants... are mentioned by name, the names are generally Jewish. The Stalinist-controlled American Youth Congress has placed pickets... The names of the pickets announced in the press are also Jewish..." And so on.

The American Jewish Committee Changes Line

And so, says the AJC: "During 1950, whenever appropriate opportunities arose, we stressed the role of the Jew in the fight against COMMUNISM. We have employed MASS MEDIA to feature the activities of Jewish individuals who... oppose Communist totalitarianism..." There follows the support of the CRUSADE FOR FREEDOM, the derision of Soviet envoy MALIK, and the Stockholm Peace Petition... etc.

"We have also exerted our influence to dissociate Jews themselves from the activities of Communists and fellow-travelers. . . against the affiliation of Communist. . . organizations with legitimate Jewish groups", And as the result of AJC pressure:

"The Jewish People's Fraternal Order" (Note: of the Communist Party's Intl. Workers' Order)" and other organizations of like character have recently been disaffiliated from Jewish communities in various parts of the country... our chapters have assumed a leadership role ... taking the fight against Communist-dominated Jewish groups directly into the local Community Relations Councils" (of Jewry) "with such success..." (p. 555) "...we participated in the All-American Conference against Communism sponsored by the American Legion in order to insure that certain reactionary groups and individuals should not...sell to the American public a brand of anti-communism..." (Note: which might expose the FACT that Communism is a Jewish technique, invention and game, now as always). Pressure was put on to sidetrack the Red connections of Anna Rosenberg—as a Talmudic defense measure.

On and on, this Jewish game is outlined until page 559 contains boasts of the "significant advances. . .in achieving the elimination of hostile references from CHRISTIAN textbooks and lesson books, particularly relating to the Crucifixion story... Largely due to our efforts . . . 85% of Protestant textbooks are free of disparaging references to the Jew. Similar, tho not quite as extensive, results have been achieved among Catholics . . . Arrangements have been completed with . . . the NATIONAL COUNCIL of CHURCHES whereby

the AJC and ADL "(Note: Anti-Defamation Lg of B'nai B'rith)" will jointly. . .aid in the preparation of lesson materials, study guides and visual aids . . . sponsored by the Protestant organizations." Aid to atheist court cases is then covered.

AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS, EXH. 240

As for the millionaire American Jewish Committee in regard to the American Jewish Congress: "The two organizations differed on the question of method rather than of principle". And conferences were held between the two outfits, both dedicated to one objective—the supremacy of Talmudism all over the world.

We see Sholem Asch, author of deceitful "Christian" stories, who served on the staff of the socialist Yiddish FORWARD, then on that of the Stalinist FREIHEIT, also printed in Yiddish. There is Rabbi Judah L. Magnes, Schiff's pet rabbi of the Communist Garland Fund, etc.; Louis Marshall, humbler of Henry Ford, and Louis D. Brandeis whose hysterical cry to Jewry was: "Organize, organize, organize!" until every Jew has to stand up and be counted with or against his pack. Pres. Wilson put Zionist Brandeis, the largest single contributor to Communist Commonwealth College, on the Supreme Court. Free love, nude bathing, singing the Soviet International, in the training school for red agitators, Commonwealth College, at Mena, Ark., resulted finally in the place being closed up under the Arkansas anarchy law, after the whole Jewish FDR crowd had deluged the place with support and sympathy.

Exh. 242—Jewry Sustains the Red Russian Revolution

My book THE OCTOPUS (1940, written under the pen name of Rev. Frank Woodruff Johnson at my husband's request) was written to factually refute, as it does, the lying propaganda bilge of B'NAI B'RITH in its brochure which was widely copied under Jewish pressure by Christian dupes, entitled: "Answer Anti-Jewish Propaganda with Statistics." The title would be more fitting if it were: "Answer Anti-Talmudic Truths with Lies."

We "Dumb Dogs"

First, the Jew KARL MARX was handed to the Christians, altho every Jewish source today boasts of his rabbinical ancestry, and his "keen dialectical abil-

ity" as manifested in his "masterpiece" (the abstruse, hairsplitting Das Kapital, of dull wind), being due to this Talmudic inheritance. Knowing Christians to be the suckers they are, they had no fear of misrepresentting a Jew they adore as a Christian product! Christians do not know enough to check up on what they don't know. They loll in innocent ignorance. As before the foretold slaughter and deportation, with loss forever of national sovereignty, of the Israel kingdom, for their black magic pagan crimes, the Prophet Isaiah said:

"His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter" (Isa. 56:10-11).

Thus he prophecied, 760-698 BC and, in 721 BC, the Israel kingdom was slaughtered and finished, unrepentant, unhearing.

The B'nai B'rith "defense" was more revealing than defending—if one knows the subject. For example, the Mensheviks were a branch of the Socialist Second International along with the Bolsheviks—Tweedle-Dum instead of Tweedle-Dee-ers, all Marxian Talmudic revolutionaries with one objective. Hence the folly of telling an informed person that Jews were not Communistic because: "THE GREAT PART OF THE RUSSIAN JEWISH POPULATION BELONGED TO THE MENSHEVIK PARTY, WHICH WAS A DEMOGRATIC PARTY AND OPPOSED TO THE BOLSHEVIK PARTY" (B'nai B'rith Article 5, p. 12).

The same tactic for suckers was employed for the German Jewish Reds. To whitewash these of the Red flag, the same B'nai B'rith article (Article 5, p. 11) stated that in Hitler Germany: "MOST OF THE JEWS WERE SOCIAL DEMOCRATS." Turning to the authoritative N. Y. State Committee Investigating Subversive Activities' Report (headed by Sen. Clayton Lusk, 1920): "The principles of the Karl Marx COMMUNIST MANIFESTO were adopted as early as 1869 as the basis of the first SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY." And, in 1891, the Party's "Congress . . . adopted a thorough and comprehensive Marxian position . . . which remained the basis of the Party from that time forward . . . The Party had over 3,000, 000 votes in 1903" (N.Y. State Lusk Report pp. 87-8). While, in Marx' lifetime, it was led by his students, Wilhelm Liebknecht and August Bebels, its Left-Wing under Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg (Jews) staged the bloody Sparticist revolution to Sovietize Germany in which they were killed, Jan. 15. 1919.

The Bolshevik Soviets

The Hungarian Soviet set up by another Jew in 1919, BELA KUN (Cohen), spent 32 days of murdering, torturing Christians, burning nuns alive in an oven, as a former border guard himself described to me. When this preliminary regime fell, the Jews and their pack who conducted it were killed in large numbers by outraged citizens. Of this the above N.Y. Lusk report states, under the index: "HUNGARIAN AND SOVIET GOVERNMENTS PRINCIPALLY JEW-ISH:

"Of thirty-two principal Commissars, twenty-five were Jews, which was about the same proportion as in Russia."

The BUND

Altho B'nai B'rith (and all Jewish encyclopedias and histories of the authoritative class) admit the Jewishness of Bolshevik leaders, the above B'nai B'rith would-be whitewash of Jewry as a whole, whose Talmud is but Bolshevism in doctrine, states:

"As for that part of Jewry which was united politically as JEWISH, it grouped itself in the only mass-like Jewish party, the BUND. The BUND as well as the Zionists have been persecuted by Bolshevism from the first days of the October upheaval of 1917 to the present day . . . " (Article 5, p. 30).

But to quote the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia ("Bund"): "After the revolution of March, 1917, the Bund grew rapidly . . . It succeeded in electing 800 of its candidates to city councils, and 515 to Jewish community boards . . . The Bolshevik revolution in October of the same year led to sharp conflict of opinion within the BUND. Certain groups immediately joined the Communist Party; others . . . formed separate Communist BUNDS (Kombund) for a time, but soon after joined the Communist Party as well. The members who remained in the party decided at the 11th convention (1919) to favor a SOVIET form of government . . . A year later the MAJORITY of the party had adopted the Communist platform and shortly afterwards were ready to liquidate the BUND itself and join the Communist Party. These conflicts reduced the Bund to a fraction of its former size . . . What was left of the Bund in Russia was suppressed by the Soviet government in 1920." At the article's end, is this: "See also SOCIALISM."

Thus the separate existence of the BUND in Russia was finished by the members joining the Bolsheviks in form, as well as in feeling and action as before.

Not Reproduced in Exhibits

Pages 1256-61 of the Kehilla report, not reproduced tell how the Russian BUND in this country formed the Jewish Socialist Federation of America here, and was

foremost in organizing the National Workmen's Committee of radicals of 1915, representing: "a total membership of half a million Jewish workmen...representative of all radical wings" (p. 1448 of same, see Exh. 239), Further:

"A net of BUND branches was spread thruout the United States and Canada. For a number of years these branches, whose primary object was to collect funds for the BUND in Russia, were the most active and influential bodies in the Jewish radical world. Their members formed the vanguard of the Workmen's Circle and swelled the ranks of the Jewish trade unions. The activities of the branches were coordinated and supervised by a CENTRAL-VERBAND . . . "
(p. 1257, not reproduced).

Exh. 242: The CENTRAL VERBAND of the BUND

Note that this 1917-18 report states that the purpose of this Central Verband of the Bund, here, was to raise thruout all its branches funds to maintain and sustain the completed Bolshevik Red Revolution in Russia:

"Since the Russian Revolution in 1917, the Central Verband of the Bund has been active in collecting funds to assist the Russian Bund in its work AGAINST COUNTER-REVOLUTION forces and against the agitation by the Black Hundred for massacre of the Jews" (Exh. 242). As in Hungary, Russians were wholly aware of the fact that the bloody Red Revolution was the work of Jewry. Instead of eliminating the Jews, millions and millions of Russian Christians have been tortured and deliberately slave-labored to death in concentration camps in accordance with the Talmudic doctrine that non-Jews, and particularly hated Christians who are below mere animals, are "the people who are like an ass—slaves who are considered the property of the master"—the Talmudic "human."

We see in Exh. 224 how the Jewish Kehillah report boasted of Pinchas Rutenberg as a founding force in the American Jewish Congress as well as right hand man to Jewish Kerensky in the Russian Revolution.

Mourning the death of their founder, Pinchas Rutenberg, the American Jewish Congress publication, the Congress Weekly (1/16/42), in an article, "RUT-ENBERG'S MISSION TO AMERICA" said:

"His role in the birth of the American Jewish Congress was immense... The young Russian intellectual, in other words, revolutionist, soon made his influence felt in the underground council of the Social Revolutionary Party. Rutenberg was the man who, in 1905, piloted the revolutionary activities of the notorious Father Capon and then sat in judgment and brought about his execution.

Father Gapon

The above Father Gapon incident is typical of Judasism. The dramatic prayer addressed to the Czarist government with the threat that if it were not granted "we shall die here on the Square before thy Palace," combined with mutinies, strikes involving more than 2,000,000 people, are related in Chamberlin's "History of the Russian Revolution." We read: "Gapon himself was doubtful about the wisdom of bringing large masses . . . to present this petition" (Vol. I, p. 48). Yet Gapon was pushed ahead as the leader. Then, "when the demonstrators refused to obey orders to disperse and go home volleys of rifle fire were poured on them . . . The casualties of Bloody Sunday (Jan. 22, 1905) are estimated at from two hundred to fifteen hundred. . ." (same).

That the Jew Rutenberg "piloted the revolutionary activities of the notorious Fr. Gapon then sat in judgment and brought about his execution," is not mentioned by historian Wm. Henry Chamberlain who reminds one in some ways of Fr. Gapon. He was correspondent for 12 years in Russia for the Leftist-oriented Christian Scientist Monitor, and now writes for the new Jewish-line "Anti-Communist" Human Events; is the darling of the anti-Socialist "patriots" as he serves as Contributing Editor of the Socialist Social Democratic Federation Party's magazine, New Leader, and writes for the Wall Street Journal. Father Gapon was a "conservative" friend of the people also. The New Leader is Jewish-run, as is Human Events. Many served like the Gapons, then their pilots sat in judgment when the time came and had them executed. To parody the old saying, "it is the way of a man with a maid," it is the way of a "hu-man" with the asses he has made. It is Judas-ism.

JUDAS: according to the Talmud, he defiled Jesus in aerial combat (a tale of wishful thinking known as "haggadah") second page, Exh. 279. This aerial battle is again referred to: "Judas remained victor and Jesus fled." See Exh. 278, left column center.

"Judas 'the betrayer' . . . does not occur at all in Talmudic legends," Exh. 278, right column, center.

KARAITES: a tiny sect of Jews now practically extinct, who revolted against the Babylonian Talmud under Anan in Babylonia in the 8th century. Anan was, with true Talmudic "brotherhood" and "tolerance," ex-

pelled from Babylonia and founded his sect in Jerusalem. The supreme curses the Karaites have shared with Christians are due to the adherence of the Karaites to the Bible, instead of to the "sages" or Talmud. They are likened to the Sadducees and Samaritans in this. . . Exhs. 16, 24-6

KETHUBOTH, book of the Babylonian Talmud, title page . . . Exh. 119.

The Kethubah is a contract promising to pay a wife a certain sum of money if the husband divorces her, which he can do at will, according to Talmudic doctrine. The Kethubah need not be paid if the wife can be proven not to have been a virgin when married. Hence the custom of the groomsmen waiting outside the bridal chamber door for the bloody sheet to be exhibited, proving the wife's virginity, in case witnesses are needed. Elaborate cuts of these Kethuboth appear in the 1943 Universal Jewish Ency.

Virginity at a Price

A Dr. A. A. Whamond who ran a private hospital of his own on Washington Blvd., in Chicago, used to boast to a member of my family about the money he made by putting in false hymens, cat-gut, for Jewish girls who were not virgins before they were to be married. The Talmud price for getting rid of a wife, who had been a virgin, is "200 zuz", given by the Univ. Jewish Ency. as 200 denarii or about \$30. "If the wife refuses sexual intercourse, she can be threatened with a reduction of her claims in the Kethubah, and this threat can be carried out" (same source). If the husband can contend that the wife had not been a virgin, she gets only "a maneh", or the smallest coin, says the Talmud. The talk about blood and virginity is perhaps the favorite Talmudic subject, endless, seemingly.

Exhs. 121-145 on blood and intercourse are typical of the Talmudic mind. Note the successions of running pages, precluding the charge that certain ones are taken out of context. Filth, sadism and criminality are the essence of this religion.

MARY, MOTHER OF JESUS

All rabbinical sources ascribe to Jesus, "illegitimate birth. ..the seducer was a soldier by the name of Panthera" (also called Pandira, and Stada). "Pappus" (husband of Mary) "has nothing to do with the story of Jesus, and was only connected with it because his wife happened to be called 'Miriam' (Mary) and was known to be an adulteress". All the Life of Jesus (Toledot Yeshu) "editions contain a similar story of a dispute which Jesus carried on with the SCRIBES who on the ground of that dispute declared him to be a bastard" (Jewish Ency., "Jesus", Exh. 277).

The MESSIAH

"The Messiah" (is) "without metaphor the Jewish people" (Kethuboth 111a). Exh. 147.

MISHNA (plural Mishnaim)

Altho the Mishna or law of one or another Pharisee may be referred to as the "Mishna of Rabbi Akiba", or of "Eliezer ben Jacob": "The name Mishnah is applied in particular to the collection of Halachoth, or laws made by Judah Hanasi (generally known as Rabbi) and his colleagues at the beginning of the 3rd century C. E." (Note: "C. E." stands for "Common Era", to avoid "A. D.", meaning Year of Our Lord, from the Latin, Anno Domini). Continuing to quote:

"The Mishna represents the culmination of a series of attempts to bring order into the vast mass of traditions which had been transmitted orally for many centuries . . . The compilation of the Mishna is not, however, the work of one man, or even of the scholars of one age, but rather the result of a long process extending over a period of two centuries". In the Palestine Pharisee Talmudic center at Jabneh (for it was never in Jerusalem but at Jabneh where the Jerusalem Talmud was concocted), "there was a concerted effort on the part of the sages of Jabneh (about 90 C. E.) to assemble and harmonize the Halachah . . . Akiba (died about 135 C. E.) arranged the Halachoth in logical order and probably constructed the framework of the present day Mishnah; (4) the collection of Akiba was enlarged and brought up to date by his disciple Meir" (Note: which the Talmud says was a descendant of Nero who had been a convert to Talmudism); "(5) it became the custom, after the time of Akiba, for every head of an academy to compile his own Mishnah so that the confusion that resulted . . . . motivated Judah Hanasi to compile a standard authoritative Mishna; (6) although it is reported that Judah made use of thirteen different collections of Halachoth in his work, his Mishnah is based largely upon the collection of MEIR, and indirectly, therefore, upon that of Akiba" (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, "MISHNAH").

Sanhedrin

"The usual number of the Great Sanhedrin was seventy-one. However, this was the case only in the time of the Zugoth" (Note: pairs) "when there were both a NASI and an AB BETH DIN (from 141 to 30 B.C.E.). Thereafter, when Hillel assumed power and the HILLELITE house controlled the entire institution for the next hundred years, the position of the Ab

Beth Din was abolished, reducing the number to seventy" ("Sanhedrin", Universal Jewish Ency.).

Hillel and Christ

Since the HILLEL school of Pharisees controlled the Sanhedrin from 30 BC to around 70 AD, when Jerusalem was demolished and the Sanhedrin passed out of existence, the Hillelites were in control when CHRIST walked the earth. Today, in some 200 American colleges, propaganda centers for Jews featuring lectures, etc. to befuddle Christians, are functioning and named HILLEL centers. The sect of Pharisees flourishes today as never before in history, and is carrying the world on to that conflict of the ages fore-told thruout Scripture, signaled by the seventh world government now rising.

Nero's Crowd

"The Talmud tells that . . . NERO was converted to Judaism and that from him was descended Rabbi MEIR" (Univ. Jewish Ency., "Nero"). The sadistic butcheries of Christians conducted by Nero have made him world infamous down the centuries. But all of his garden-lighting with pitch-smeared bodies of living Christians used as torches, was conducted on a kindergarten basis in comparison with the present-day torture, enslavement and liquidation of millions of Christians at the hands of Iron Curtain Talmudists in pursuance of Talmudic doctrine, to which Nero was a convert. Already, the Babylonian Whore-Like Power is "drunken with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus", as foretold (Rev. 17).

MIN, Exh. 284

MIN, plural Minim: used thruout the Talmud to designate Christians. In the Shemoneh Esreh, or 18 Benedictions, the word has been changed from time to time as wary neighbors became aware of its meaning. Note, left column of Exh. 284, that Zaddukim was substituted, and Apikoresim.

In the right column, we see Epicureans substituted by Maimonides (Talmudic pillar). Reference is made to uncensored Talmud editions of Berechoth 28b (left col.) Sanhedrin 27a; Horyoth 11a and Gittin 45a. The Berechoth gem reads: "The benediction relating to the MINIM was instituted in Jabneh" (Palestine) "after the rest". And the harangue goes on to decree vengeance against anyone who left out the benediction against the MINIM, "because we suspect him of being a MIN".

that "a scroll of the Law which has been written by a MIN should be burnt." Distilled Hate is the spirit.

MOLECH in Bible and Talmud

The Biblical denunciations of the "abominations", such as Molech and Baal worship, carry little color to the modern reader who is ignorant of the black demonism, the bloody cruelty and unbridled perverted lust of paganism, nor do Biblical writers of today enlighten us. Soundly bedded in the Bible and ancient history is Gustave Flaubert's description of child sacrifice to the Baal Molech in Carthage, which had been founded by the Phoenicians. Their city Tyre, the New York trading center of the ancient world, was infamous for its Lesbianism, Sodomy and Child-burning black rites. Its total and permanent destruction fore-told by Ezekiel (chap. 26, 27) was finally fulfilled to the last detail after Alexander the Great sold 30,000 of the leading citizens of their off-shore retreat into slavery, building a causeway out of the battered walls and towers Nebuchadnezzar had demolished.

"All were feeble in comparison with Moloch the Destroyer... there was no pain great enough for the god, since he delighted in such as was of the most horrible description... He must, accordingly, be fully gratified—it was believed that an immolation by fire would purify Carthage. The ferocity of the people was predisposed towards it.

"The Ancients assembled . . . and when the pontiff of Moloch asked them whether they would consent to surrender their children . . . All successively bent their heads in approval . . . The decision was almost immediately known in Carthage, and lamentations resounded. The cries of the women might everywhere be heard; their husbands consoled them, or railed at them with remonstrances . . . Then . . . the priests of Moloch began their task. Men in black robes presented themselves in the houses . . . the servants of Moloch came and took the children away. Others themselves

surrendered them stupidly. Then they were brought to the temple of Tanith, where the priestesses were charged with their amusement and support until the solemn day. . . .

"Part of a wall in the temple of Moloch was thrown down in order to draw out the brazen god without touching the ashes of the altar. Then as soon as the sun appeared the hierodules pushed it towards the square of Khamon.

"It moved backwards sliding upon cylinders; its shoulders overlapped the walls. No sooner did the Carthaginians see it in the distance than they speedily took to flight, for the Baal could be looked upon with impunity only when exercising his wrath.

"A smell of aromatics spread thru the streets. All the temples had just been opened simultaneously, and from them came forth tabernacles borne upon chariots, or upon litters carried by the pontiffs. Great plumes swayed at the corners of them, and rays were emitted from their slender pinnacles which terminated in balls of crystal, gold, silver or copper.

NTARY 85

Jeremiah bewailed the paganism of those whose "children gather wood and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven" (Jer. 7:18). But when they had to flee into Egypt, and Jerusalem was leveled to the ground for their abominations, as foretold, and Jeremiah reproved them for the same worship of the sexgoddess, they replied that they would do as they pleased: because they had plenty when they did that and had had troubles since they quit "And . . . did we make her cakes to worship her, and pour our drink offerings unto her without our men?" (Jer. 44:18, 19). Then Jeremiah tells them that is just why they are in the trouble they are—because they did these things.

"The brazen statue continued to advance towards the square of Khamon. The rich, carrying scepters with emerald balls. . . the Ancients with diadems on their heads. . masters of the finances, governors of provinces, sailors and the numerous horde employed at funerals, all with the insignia of their magistracies or the instruments of their calling, were making their way . . . At last the Baal arrived exactly in the Centre of the square. His pontiffs arranged an enclosure with trellis-work to keep off the multitude. . ." A picture is drawn of the various orders and their positions, their colorful array, "the necromancers all covered with tattooings and the shriekers in patched cloaks. . . and the Yidonim, who put the bone of a dead man into their mouths to learn the future. The priests of Ceres . . . were chanting a thesmophorion in the Megarian dialect." (Note: the festival in honor of female procreation was Thesmophoria).

"From time to time files of men arrived, completely naked, their arms outstretched, and all holding one another by the shoulders . . . they drew forth a hoarse and cavernous intonation; their eyes. . . shone thru the dust, and they swayed their bodies simultaneously, and at equal distances, as the they were all affected by a single movement. They were so frenzied that to restore order the hierodules compelled them, with blows of the stick, to lie flat on the ground, with their faces resting against the brass trellis work".

Why Moses Decreed as He Did

"He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy

member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord" (Deut. 23:1).

The Fire Burns for the Children

Continuing Flaubert:

"Meantime a fire of aloes, cedar, and laurel was burning between the legs of the colossus. The tips of its long wings dipped into the flame; the unquents with which it had been rubbed flowed like sweat over its brazen limbs.

"Around the circular flagstone on which its feet rested, the children, wrapped in black veils, formed a motionless circle. . .The rich, the Ancients, the women, the whole multitude, thronged behind the priests and on the terraces of the houses. The large painted stars revolved no longer; the tabernacles were set upon the ground; and the fumes from the censers ascended perpendicularly. . .

"Many fainted; others became inert and petrified in their ecstasy. Infinite anguish weighed upon the breasts of the beholders . . . At last the high priest of Moloch passed his left hand beneath the children's veils, plucked a lock of hair from their foreheads and threw it upon the flames. Then the men in the red cloaks chanted the sacred hymn: 'Homage to thee, SUN! king of the two zones, self-generating Creator'... their voices were lost in the outburst of instruments sounding simultaneously to drown the cries of the victims. The eight-stringed scheminiths, the kinnors which had ten strings and the nebals which had twelve, grated, whistled, and thundered. Enormous leathern bags, bristling with pipes, made a shrill clashing noise; the tambourines, beaten with all the players' might, resounded with heavy, rapid blows; and, in spite of the fury of the clarions, the salsalim snapped like grasshoppers' wings.

"The hierodules, with a long hook, opened the seven-storied compartments on the body of the Baal. They put meal into the highest, two turtle-doves into the second, an ape into the third, a ram into the fourth, a sheep into the fifth, and as no ox was to be had for the sixth, a tawny hide taken from the sanctuary was thrown into it. The seventh compartment yawned empty still. . . it was well to make trial of the arms of the god. Slender chainlets stretched from his fingers up to his shoulders and fell behind, where men by pulling them made the two hands rise to a level with the elbows, and come close together against the belly; they were moved several times in succession with little abrupt jerks."

As In the Bible

"Then the instruments were still. The fire roared. An individual sacrifice was necessary, a perfectly voluntary oblation . . . Then the priests to encourage the people drew bodkins from their girdles and gashed

their faces" (Note the description in I Kings 18:28 of the priests of Baal: "And they cried aloud, and cut themselves after their manner with knives and lancets, till the blood gushed out upon them").

"The Devotees, who were stretched on the ground outside, were brought within the enclosure. A bundle of horrible irons was thrown to them, and each chose his own torture. They drove in spits between their breasts; they split their cheeks... then they twined their arms together, and surrounded the children in another large circle which widened and contracted in turns. They reached to the balustrade; they threw themselves back again, and then began once more, attracting the crowd to them by the dizziness of their motion with its accompanying blood and shrieks."

And Hinduism

A newsreel I saw in recent years showed the knifesticking, and goat-bleeding rites of Kali in India, horrible sights. Kali, to quote, is "a Hindu goddess. She is represented as black, with four arms, wearing a necklace of skulls, and the hands of slaughtered giants round her waist as a girdle. Her eyebrows and breast appear streaming with the blood of monsters she has slain and devoured. One hand holds a sword, another a human head. She is the goddess of death and destruction, and goats and other animals are sacrificed on her altars. Ancient Hindu books even enjoined human sacrifices to this bloodthirsty goddess. Her worship is said to be characterized by vile secret rites" (American Intl. Ency. "Kali"). In sex filth, degrading treatment of baby girls, low status of women, and the caste system, Talmudic Judaism and Hinduism are closely allied. Whereas the appeasement of many spirits is covered in Judaism and is open in Hinduism, the caste system which numbers some 2,000 Hindu castes, is much simplified in Judaism, there being but two castes: the human and the animal, that is the "Jew" and non-Jew, the "Brahmin" or semi-divine "Jew," and the non-Jewish "Untouchable".

The Moloch Sacrifice Climaxes

"At last a man who tottered, a man pale and hideous with terror, thrust forward a child; then a little black mass was seen between the hands of the colossus, and sank into the dark opening. The priests bent over the edge of the great flagstone, and a new song burst forth

"The children ascended slowly, and as the smoke formed lofty eddies as it escaped . . . Not one stirred. Their wrist and ankles were tied, and the dark drapery prevented them from seeing anything and from being recognized . . .

"The brazen arms were working more quickly. They paused no longer. Every time that a child was placed in them the priests of Moloch spread out their hands upon him to burden him with the crimes of the people vociferating:

"'They are not men, but oxen!' The devout exclaimed: 'Lord! eat!' and the priests of Proserpine complying thru terror with the needs of Carthage, muttered the Eleusinian formula: 'Pour out rain! bring forth!'

"The victims when scarcely at the edge of the opening, disappeared like a drop of water on a red-hot plate, and white smoke rose amid the great scarlet color. Nevertheless, the appetite of the god was not appeased. He ever wished for more. In order to furnish him with a larger supply, the victims were piled up on his hands with a big chain above them which kept them in their place. Some devout persons had at the beginning wished to count them, to see whether their number corresponded with the days of the solar year, but others were brought, and it was impossible to distinguish them in the giddy motion of the horrible arms. This lasted for a long, indefinite time until the evening. Then the partitions inside assumed a darker glow, and burning flesh might have been seen. Some even believed they could descry hair, limbs, and whole bodies.

"Night fell: clouds accumulated above the Baal. The funeral-pile, which was flameless now, formed a pyramid of coals up to his knees; completely red like a giant covered with blood, he looked, with his head thrown back, as tho he were staggering beneath the weight of his intoxication.

"In proportion as the priests made haste, the frenzy of the people increased; as the number of the victims was diminishing, some cried out to spare them, others that still more were needful. The walls, with their burden of people, seemed to be giving away beneath the howlings of terror and mystic voluptuousness. Then the faithful came into the passages, dragging their children, who clung to them; and they beat them in order to make them let go, and handed them over to the men in red. The instrument-players sometimes stopped thru exhaustion; then the cries of the mothers might be heard, and the frizzling of the fat as it fell upon the coals.

share in the sacrifice;—fathers, whose children had died previously, cast their effigies, their playthings, their preserved bones into the fire." (The next reminds one of Deut. 14:1 "ye shall not cut yourselves").

"Some who had knives rushed upon the rest. They slaughtered one another. The hierodules took the fallen ashes at the edge of the flagstone in bronze fans, and cast them into the air that the sacrifice might be scattered over the town and even to the region of the stars.

Carthage was under siege from the unpaid Barbarians whom they had enlisted in their war against Rome, as mercenaries. They were out of funds, water etc. at the time.

Lacroix on Moloch

"Moloch was represented under the figure of a man with the head of a calf . . . erected upon an immense oven, which was lighted to consume at once the seven kinds of offerings. During this holocaust, the priests of Moloch kept up a terrible music, with sistrums and tambours, in order to stifle the cries of the victims. Then took place that infamy cursed by the God of Israel: the Molochites abandoned themselves to practices worthy of the land of Onan" (masturbation) "and, inspired by the rhythmic sound of the musical instruments, writhed about the incandescent statue, which appeared red thru the smoke; and they gave forth frenzied cries as, in accordance with the Biblical expression, they gave their seed to Moloch" (History of Prostitution," by Paul Lacroix, French author, historian; 1806-84).

The TALMUD Today On Moloch, Exhibits 66-69

By sheer shysterism, burning children to the demon Moloch is permitted today by the supreme legal authority of the so-called "Jewish" religion, the opposite of Old Testament religion, which is the Babylonian Talmud. The Talmud book of SANHEDRIN, 64a-64b teaches the following. And, remember, the book of Sanhedrin is, according to its Introduction in the Soncino English translation of 1935, the "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud" (Exh. 43).

The Mishna sets out to make the very clear orders of Moses against burning or causing to be burned any child to Molech into two parts: (1) handing the child to those "men in red," the priests of Molech (to burn); (2) causing the child to be burned. Of course, giving the child to the priest to put on the idol's hands which

are raised to dump it into the furnace inside the idol IS causing the child to pass thru the fire.

But, note the explanation to the Mishna (Exh. 66). The Mishna states in shyster fashion: "HE WHO GIVES OF HIS SEED TO MOLECH INCURS NO PUNISHMENT unless HE DELIVERS IT TO MOLECH" (1) "and CAUSES IT TO PASS THROUGH THE FIRE" (2). "IF HE GAVE IT TO MOLECH but did not CAUSE IT TO PASS THROUGH the FIRE, or the REVERSE" (Note: caused it to pass thru the fire, but did not give it to Molech) "HE INCURS NO PENALTY, unless HE DOES BOTH." Then explained:

"(5) As two separate offenses, proving that giving one's seed to Molech is not idolatry," says the explanatory footnote, altho it is nothing BUT foul idolatry.

Quibbling along some more, "UNLESS HE GIVES IT TO MOLECH" is subverted into this: "Punishment is not incurred unless he delivers his seed to the acolytes of Molech" (PLUS causing it to pass thru the fire, of course). And the explanatory footnote says that the Sage teaching this: "He explains this to be the meaning of the Mishna UNLESS HE GIVES IT TO MOLECH (5) This proves that the offense consists of two parts; (1) formal delivery to the priests, and (2) causing the seed to pass through the fire" (Exh. 67). In other words, give it to the priests to burn, and burn it oneself!

Exh. 68 is a masterpiece of satanism: "If one caused ALL his seed to pass thru the fire to Molech, he is exempt, because it is written, 'OF THY SEED' implying, but not all thy seed." Here in footnote 4 the Biblical citation as authority is given as Leviticus XX, 2 (following) which reads: "And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying: . . . Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel that giveth ANY OF HIS SEED to Molech . . ." and the treatment of a murderer is demanded: "He shall surely be put to death." So, unless one puts the child in the fire and also hands it to the "men in red," the priests of Molech, to burn—one is free of blame—and to do both is an impossibility, so one IS free to burn children to Molech!

There is no ignorance, just sheer satanic blasphemy. The verses forbidding any one to burn or cause to be burned any of one's children to Molech are cited clearly.

Exhibit 68 Falsifies

Footnote "(4)" I have underlined, as it cites Leviticus 20:2 — and following as the source of the passage.

Footnote "(7)" specifies verse 4 of the same Lev. 20:2—Altho the death penalty is demanded in verse 2 for the person who "giveth ANY of his seed to Molech," and verse 4 is a continuation of this thought, adding that those who fail to punish the child-burner are guilty also, as is the man who "hath given OF HIS SEED to Molech," this is the Talmudic twist for verse 4:

'If one caused all his seed to pass through the fire to Molech, he is exempt from punishment, because it is written. OF THY SEED, implying, but not all thy seed." In other words, the supposed admonition not to burn part of your children, licenses you to burn all of your children! To tell you not to steal one object, likewise, would give permission to clean out everything in the place you robbed! That is the "wisdom of the Sages!"

Thus, as Christ put it to the Pharisees, they make the "commandment of God of none effect. Ye hypocrites! well did Esaias" (Isaiah) "prophecy of you, saying, This people draw nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" (Matt. 15:7). Christ referred to Isaiah 29:13, and Isaiah knew the breed of Satanists who use the Bible to destroy it.

No one with a grain of common decency could teach anything but the utmost demunciation for mur dering children in orgies of blood and obscenity. But the Talmud permits this, in its supreme "repository of the criminal law of the Talmud," TODAY!

MURDER Exhibits 85-89

IN GENERAL: mere shyster hairsplitting is inserted to befuddle permission to seal up a neighbor in an airtight "alabaster chamber" — providing one does not put in a lighted candle to help eat up the oxygen, but allows the victim to pass out by breathing it up himself unaided. See Exhibit 86 (Sanhedrin 77a-77b).

Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of starvation; Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of sunstroke; Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of cold;

Binding up your neighbor so that a lion may kill him or mosquitoes bite him to death; Throwing your neighbor into a pit and leaving him to die there; let him starve! Killing your neighbor with arrow wounds;—al these killings are okay (Exhs. &5 - &6).

Exhs. 87 gives some more jolly instructions on how to drown your neighbor and yet be "guiltless" of his death! Just bind up the neighbor before it is hot or cold enough to kill him and all is well—you are guiltless of what follows. As for the lion, he could not have fought him anyway, so that is alright too. As for the mosquitoes, they come and go, so, since the ones which bit him when you tied the victim go away and others finish him, you are pure and blameless again. Shooting the neighbor with an arrow is alright since if there is balsam for sale, somewhere, he presumably could have sent for some and been cured instead of dying. Remember to cause the water to travel a little distance before it drowns the neighbor—then you are guiltless of his death!

Ten Innocent Men

It is granted that the Bible forbids taking a man's life—but that means taking his life all by yourself. That is, you must not take the whole of his life all alone, which permits you to help nine other men to take a life, so that: "If ten men smote a man with ten staves whether simultaneously or successively, and he died, they are exempt". Answering the Rabbi who suggests that killing whatever is left of a man's life might be wrong, we learn: "If ten men assailed him successively, he was already nearly dead when the last smote him: therefore the last, too, is exempt" (Exh. 88).

"Mercy" Killings, Exhs. 88-89

Elaborate pains were taken, rather recently, to have rabbis deny that "mercy" killings are permitted in Judaism—because they ARE. The public discussion was on whether or not a hopelessly sick person should be put out of his misery. The Rabbis denied that that would be proper. Exhibits 88 and 89 of the "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud", Sanhedrin 77b—78a, contain these rabbinical edicts: "Both agree that if he killed a TEREFAH—a person... suffering from some fatal organic disease, recovery from which is impossible—he is exempt" (Exh. 88). And: "If one kills a TEREFAH, he is exempt; whilst if a terefah committed murder: if in the presence of a Beth Din" (Note: a Talmudic law court) "he is liable; otherwise he is exempt".

This uplifting passage continues with the matter of sodomy, which is harmless if committed with a terefah or with a dead body: "one who commits pederasty with a terefah. . . is as one who abuses a dead person, and hence exempt" (Exh. 89).

When young women died, ancient historians tell us, their bodies were kept from the undertaker's long

NAZIR, title page, Exh. 164

A book of asinine vowings which clarify Christ's denunciations of Pharisee vowings. A Nazirite (to vow) was one who had vowed not to cut his hair or drink or eat any product of the grape for a certain time. Only reading is believing that such idiocy exists today. The Mishna on the Heifer and the Door is an example (not reproduced). The Mishna opens with the Door saying if the man doesn't open it, and the HEIFER saying if the man does not make it stand up, he must be a Nazir. Three pages of haranguing Gemara discuss the fact that the heifer then got up of its own volition. The door shuts up, evidently, for nothing more is said by it. The school of Shammai holds that since the man did not of his own power force the heifer up, he must be a Nazir; but the Hillel gang say that the essence of the vow is the upping of the heifer which was "recumbent" (fancy term for lying down) and is now standing up, so the man does NOT have to be a Nazir. And the schools of Hillel and Shammai were in full flower in Palestine when Christ lived.

In Matthew 5:34-6, and in Matthew 23: 16-22 are recorded the lambastings Christ gave the Pharisees for this imbecility: "ye blind guides which say, Who soever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whoseever sweareth by the gift that is upon it he is guilty. Ye fools and blind: for which is greater the gift or the altar that sanctified the gift? . . . "And Christ goes on to illustrate their silliness. Do no swear by anything, is the gist of the Matthew 5:34 passage, not by your head for you cannot "make one hair white or black". One can only appreciate His words after reading hundreds of pages of NAZIR and NEDARIM drivel.

NEDARIM (vows), title page, Exh. 170

The above applies to this book of vows, also, plus the usual garbage and odds and ends on every unrelated subject characteristic of the Talmudic grabbag mind, looking for sewage, while pomping around on silly inventions below the mind of a six-year-old child

ORAL LAW

See the BIBLE versus ORAL LAW; it is always superior to the Bible; see Exh. 60. What makes Talmudists "God's Chosen People" is only the Pharisee "Oral Law", or Babylonian Talmud, they say.

PARENTS

The Bible, thru Moses, teaches that anyone who strikes or curses his parents is worthy of death. But the Pharisee "Sages" have improved upon that. One may strike parents to the point of wounding them, while they are alive, but the sky is the limit after they are dead. Ah! what a privilege to follow the ORAL LAW or Talmud!

Nor is that all that the "Chosen People" are sanctioned in doing. They may curse their parents providing they use any term meaning God except the Y-H-W-H consonants of the word Jehovah, the Tetragrammaton, which is reserved for the Big Shots to use in whistling up demons. The word "God" is not supposed to be written or spoken today, and the California Jewish Voice carries articles in which the word is spelled "G-D" thruout. Not piety but sheer superstition governs this. And one of Christ's major "crimes" was that He pronounced the Name as spelled—see Exhibit 56 (Sanhedrin 55b-56a) from the "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud"—Sanhedrin. In this, it is explained that "Bless" is used instead of "Curse"—in Talmudic double-talk style. This style has been necessary until Iron Curtain power could be achieved, to conceal a wholly criminal religion which is a blasphemy and conspiracy against the rest of the entire human race, but Christianity and its followers first.

MOSES said that anyone who cursed or struck mother or father should be put to death (Exodus 21:15,17; Leviticus 20:9; Deuteronomy 27:16). One must honor parents.

Christ on Parents vs. Exhs. 74, 94

Christ knew Pharisee doctrine. He knew the Pharisee custom of drizzling water alternately on the hands to chase off the demons on arising, and before eating, for demons supposedly live in water and go for it. It is the pushbroom which dislodges and refunnels them. Tashlik is the current and ancient Pharisee custom of dropping crumbs into a river or body of water at Rosh Hashona, or flapping the garments at them, as the Hasidim do, to appease them. Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges in New York are much used for this today, says the Jewish Ency. of 1905, ("Tashlik").

"Yad" is hand and "Yadayim", the plural, hands. The Talmud book of Yadayim is devoted to the handwashing in connection with the demonology of Pharisaism to which Christ objected. So, when the Pharisees came baiting Him about His Apostles not doing the handwashing act, He came back at them, saying that they were hypocrites, "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. . . Full well ye reject the commandment of God that ye may keep your own tradition.

"For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death;

"But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say a gift" (Or I have dedicated to God that which would relieve your need) "...ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother: making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered, and many such like things ye do" (Mark 7:1-13). Matthew 15 contains the same denunciation and same quotation from Isaiah, calling them hypocrites, etc.

Christ was hated by the pagan Pharisees for such teachings as: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill...Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but who soever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven... except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 5:17-20).

POLYGAMY

There is nothing now, as formerly, in Talmudic doctrine, against polygamy. It is practiced by Jews in countries where it is allowed. It was Rabbi Gershom Ben Judah (born Metz, 960; died Mayence, France, 1040) whose edicts were accepted by European Jewry as final for all time, who commanded Jews in Christian countries to stop getting into trouble with the law by polygamy. Israel first proposed extra allowances for plural wives but now seems to be screening polygamy from Christian eyes.

After the period of the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and before this, in the case of Adam, and Noah, Monogamy ruled. The Prophets were Monogamists. Moses commanded regarding a man of God that: "Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away..." (Deuteronomy 17:17). And, admittedly, the polygamy of David and his son Solomon ended the Israel twelve-tribe united kingdom. Their hordes of pagan wives with foul altars broke down any Godly spirit which had formerly united them. The Pharisee "Sages" embroider upon the above words of Moses against polygamy, their permission to have 18, 24 or 48 wives (Sanhedrin 20b-21a).

The Mishna asks: "WHY THEN IS IT WRITTEN, NEITHER SHALL HE MULTIPLY WIVES TO HIMSELF... Rabbi Simeon said: He must not marry even one who may turn away his heart—(5) From which it might be inferred that he may marry a lesser number even if they should corrupt him."

The 1952 book by "Salo Wittmayer Baron, Prof. of Jewish History, Literature, and Institutions on the Miller Foundation, Columbia University" (Note: known as "Columbia the Germ of the Nation"), is

entitled: "A SOCIAL and RELIGIOUS HISTORY of the JEWS' and is published by the top American Jewish Committee's Jewish Publication Society of America. The chapter, "The World of the Talmud", cites the harem of King Solomon (which finished him morally and otherwise) saying its "memory kindled the imagination of polygamous Jews in subsequent ages". Altho, we are told, there was no real difference between Palestinian and Babylonian Jewries fundamentally, "there are indications that Babylonian Jewish society had more polygamous features than did that of Palestine."

Rabbis Advertise

"Anecdotes like those current in regard to Rab and Rabbi Nahman (who) after arriving in a foreign city they used to advertise for women ready to marry them for the time of their sejourn ('man havya le-yoma') ... In law, too, the Babylonian emphasis lay upon the Jew's right to 'marry as many wives as he is able to support' ... Perhaps egged on by the growing Christian propaganda against divorce, the Hillelite school stressed the husband's freedom to divorce his wife even for some culinary deficiency, or, as Rabbi Aquiba "(Akiba)" taught, because he had found a betterlooking woman." And, if you doubt that the above Rabbis are "saints" of the "synagogue of Satan," as Christ put it, then read up on them in the Jewish encyclopedias.

Under "Talmudic Eugenics," is this on incest: "In Egypt the Ptolemaic rulers themselves, for the most part, married their own sisters. In Parthia-Persia, marriages between parents and children were valid, and those among brothers and sisters were quite customary. The Parsee religion . . . encouraged such marriages as the fittest means of preserving family purity (cf. 'Yasna' 12, 9) . . Artaxerxes II had married his two daughters, and . . Mithraidates I had married his mother. Ardea Viraz is said to have married his seven sisters" (p.229, Vol. II). This was not harmful, we are told!

"On one point, particularly, Roman law differed from Jewish: marriages between an uncle and a niece... We recall that both Rabbi Eliezer and Abba married nieces, as did Rabbi Jose the Galilean... Rabbi Ishmael made a special effort to overrule his vow (not to marry his own niece) "and to make the niece more attractive to him by improving her teeth..." (p. 230, same). That tooth business shows his nobility?

Now, altho Moses commanded, in God's name, that a woman should not marry her uncle, or a man his aunt (Lev. 18:14), these "People of the Book" today are fighting to modify American state laws against such marriages, and have been successful in some states, on the ground that their "religion" requires such latitude. And we dumb Christians parrot the lie that "Judaism" is founded on Mosaic law, the Old

POPES, Exhs. 11, 20-21

Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin) in the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud, edited by the father of "Reform" rabbis, Isaac M. Wise, which includes a "History of the Talmud," puts his finger on the real cause of trouble between the czarist governments of Russia and the Talmudic Jews. This work was put out in 1903, which was before the 1904 Kuhn-Loeb-financed Japanese-Russian war culminated in the bloody Talmudic Red Revolution of 1905 in Russia. At the celebration of the 1917 final triumph of Jewry, at Carnegie Hall in N. Y. (N. Y. Times, 3/24/17), it was proudly told how Jacob Schiff had financed Communist propaganda spread among 50,000 Russian war prisoners in Jew-financed Japan, which sent them back to put over the 1905 Red Revolution in their Russian homeland. But Rodkinson tells what was wrong.

"The Rabbis next encountered the Popes. From the time of Pope Innocent III, the Talmud was burned at the stake in nearly every century from the 11th to the 18th in Italy, France, Germany, Spain, and many other countries . . ." He speaks of the disputations which the Popes and kings held in which the accusers of the Talmud were answered by its defenders. The results were always that, the criminality of the Talmud being revealed in all its horror, the Talmud was ordered burned, expunged or censored, until the same thing started over again. Rodkinson contines:

"Still what has been the result? The TALMUD EX-ISTS TODAY, AND NOT ONE LETTER IN IT IS MISSING." Then:

Rodkinson "Spills the Beans"

"It is true that persecutions against it are not yet at an end; accusations and calumnies by its enemies, under the new name of anti-Semites, are still directed against it, while the government of Russia legislates against and restricts the rights of the NATION WHICH ADHERES TO THE TALMUD" (Exh. 11). But, Rodkinson expects the sub-sewer TALMUD to reign eternally "as long as the sky spans the earth" (He reckoned without God).

Talmud Burned

A partial chart of the burning of the Talmud at the hands of the Kings and Popes appears in Exhibits 22 and 23.

The POPES in Jewish Encyclopedias

Jewish encyclopedias give credit to the Popes for stopping violence against them; for seeking to convert them, and securing certain rights for them in territories over which they exercised temporal power. Altho the Bishops were issuing restrictive laws against Jewish aggressions long before this, the reign of Gregory the Great (590-604) is taken as the starting point of consistent relations between the Jews and the Popes. He condemned the holding of Christian slaves by Jews.

Pope Leo VII wrote the Archbishop of Mayence a reply telling him he might offer his Jews the choice between conversion or emigrating.

Anacletus II (antipope) was a Jew and his claim to the papacy always contested.

Benedictus VIII had a number of Jews put to death for blasphemy against Jesus.

Gregory VII charged the German emperor, Henry IV, with favoritism towards the Jews, and "in 1078 he renewed the canonical laws which prohibited giving Jews power over Christians . . . Jews might not be employed as tax-farmers or mint-masters."

Popes Calixtus II (1119-24) and Pope Alexander III are cited for pro-Jewish acts.

INNOCENT III is the most hated of the Popes, in Jewish literature. In 1215, the Fourth Lateral Council which he convened "renewed the old canonical prohibitions against trusting the Jews with public offices and introduced the law demanding that Jews should wear a distinctive sign on their garments . . . Nevertheless he protected them against the fury of the French Crusaders." Under "BADCE" is more on this.

"Gregory IX . . . in various official documents insisted on the strict execution of the canonical laws against the Jews . . . . his successor," to continue quoting,

"Innocent IV, ordered the burning of the Talmud in Paris (1244)."

Thru Emperor Sigismund, "who was heavily indebted to them, they (the Jews) obtained from Pope Martin V (1417-31) . . . various bulls (1418 and 14-22)" (favorable to them). "In the last years of his pontificate, however, he repealed several of his ordinances, charging that they had been obtained under false pretenses."

Eugene IV and Nicholas V are cited for moderation. Sixtus IV sanctioned the Spanish Inquisition, which was aimed at the 300,000 Jews who had entered the Church, retained their Talmudism, and secured power over all phases of Spanish life (See "The Marrano's" by Cecil Roth, Jewish Pub. Soc. of Am.).

"Alexander VI (Borgia), known in history as the most profligate of the popes, was rather favorably inclined toward the Jews."

Today the Bulls of the POPES are buried alongside of those of LUTHER!

Clement VII (another Medici servant of Jewry) was the bastard son of Guilio, brother of Lorenzo the Magnificent, founder of the pagan salon, the Platonic Academy.

How Medicis Gained the Throne

five of his relatives cardinals, including his bastard cousin, Giulio. Leo X (Giovanni), made Pope on March 11, 1513, was ordained a priest on the 15th and made a bishop on the 19th of the same month, and he reigned until December 1, 1521, nine years.

It was Leo X who launched the selling of indulgences in 1517 which was the immediate forerunner of Luther's break with the Church, and of Europe's arousal. Every effort was made to corrupt and Talmudize the church from the inside, while Jewry worked to wreck it from the outside. The hotheads among Jews, says Cecil Reth, the Jewish historian, expected to end Christianity and supplant it with Talmudism, but when Luther nailed the theses on the Wittenberg Cathedral door, he nailed the Jews back in the ghetto, and Popes eager for Christian faith and morals were elected in place of the pro-Talmudic "humanist" Medeci popes. Luther, in turn, found the same forces polluting his own following and ended his life beseeching the Protestant princes to expel or put at hard labor all Talmudists, after burning synagogues and Talmuds first of all. Read his words—if you can find them in any library!

There is only praise for the Medici Popes in Jewish literature and only disappointment about the condition of Jewry during the Reformation and afterwards, for the succeeding Popes drove the Talmudists out of Vatican circles back into the ghetto.

Bewailing this, the Jewish Ency. reports how the Talmud was burned by Pope Julius III in 1553 and Christians prohibited from printing it. "The worst was yet to come." Paul IV (1555-1559) in his bull "Cum Nimis Absurdum" not only renewed all the canonical restrictions on Jews, but restricted their commerical activities and made them wear a yellow hat and made them live in their own territory—the ghetto. Pope Pius IV gave "a brief period of respite" (1566-72), then his successor Pius V (1566-72) "not only repealed all the concessions of his predecessor, and not only renewed the laws of Paul IV, but added some new restrictions. . . ." In 1569 he expelled the Jews from his territory.

Gregory XIII (1572-85) allowed the Jews to return but "introduced a large number of severe restrictions . . . and they were obliged to send every week at least 150 of their number" to listen to conversionist sermons (dreadful!).

Sixtus V (1585-90) "was more favorable to the Jews," and permitted the printing of the Talmud after it was censored (1586). Clement VIII (1592-1604) ordered the Jews expelled and prohibited printing of the Talmud.

Under Clement X (1670-76) the Portugal Inquisi-

tion (against Jewry) was halted but he refused to help the expelled Jews of Vienna (1670). "The worst feature . . . under papal dominion was the closing of the gates of the Roman ghe'to nights. Severe penalties awaited a Jew leaving the ghetto after dark, or a Christian entering it."

Pius VI (1775-1800) "renewed all the restrictions enacted from the 13th century. The censorship of books was strictly enforced... and their attendance at conversionist sermons was enforced." And Leo XII (1826) reinforced these rules with extreme rigor. Pius IX (1846-78) started in soft but, as stated in other Jewish literature, after he had been expelled from Rome at the hands of a Jewish movement which showed its Talmudic anti-Christian face with savagery, he changed his mind. To quote:

"Pius IX during the first two years of his pontificate, was evidently inclined to adopt a liberal attitude, but after his return from exile he . . . condemned as abominable laws all measures which gave political freedom to them . . . showed his approval of the medieval laws as enacted by Innocent III. He maintained the ghetto in Rome until it was abolished by the Italian occupation of Rome (1870)" (Jewish Ency. "Popes").

"His successor, Leo XIII (1878-1903) was the first pope who exercised no territorial jurisdiction over the Jews. His influence, nevertheless, was prejudicial to them. He encouraged anti-Semitism by bestowing distinctions on leading anti-Semitic politicians and authors, as Lueger and Drumont" (Note: Eduard Drumont's book, "LaFrance Juive" traces the Talmudization of French Christian life in every phase. A Judaized France was the result he deplored.) "he refused to interfere in behalf of Captain Dreyfus, or to issue a statement against the blood accusation" (Note: that human blood is used in Talmudic black magic rituals). "In an official document he denounced JEWS, freemasons, and anarchists as the enemies of the Church."

"Pius X (elected 1903) is not sufficiently known" (Note: this is the 1905 Jewish Ency.) "to permit a judgment... but in his diocese of Mantua, before he became pope, he had prohibited the celebration of a solemn mass on the king's birthday because the city council which asked for it had attended a celebration in the synagogue."

19th and 20th Century Popes and Jews

In 553, Emperor Justinian forbade the spread of the TALMUDIC books thruout the Roman empire (Corp. Juris can. VII Decretal, lib. V, Tit. IV, cap. 1). Popes Julius III, Paul IV, Pius V, Gregroy XIII, Clement VIII Alexander VII, Benedict XIV, etc., who issued new editions of the Index of Forbidden Books, condemned them rigorously; in accord with the orders of the Council of Trent, proscribed them.

The Index Expurgatorious issued by the above Leo XIII in 1887 stated concerning "The Talmud and other Jewish books."

"Altho in the Index issued by Pope Pius IV, the Jewish Talmud with all its glossaries, annotations, interpretations and expositions were prohibited: but if published without the name TALMUD and without its vile calumnies against the Christian religion they could be tolerated; however, Our Holy Lord Pope Clement VIII in his Constitution against impious writings and Jewish books, published in Rome in the year of Our Lord 1592 . . . proscribed and condemned them: it was not his intention thereby to permit or tolerate them even under the above conditions; for he expressly and specifically stated and willed, that the impious Talmudic, Cabalistic and other nefarious books of the Jews be entirely condemned and that they must remain always condemned and prohibited, and that his Constitution about these books must be perpetually and inviolably observed."

In 1938

"But—in order to set things straight—by this it was not intended that Jews should be allowed to abuse the hospitality of Christian countries. Along with these protective ordinances, there existed restrictive and precautionary decrees with regard to them. The civil power was in accord with the Church in this, since, as Delassus says, 'they both had the same interest in preventing the nations from being invaded by the Jewish element and thereby losing control of society.' But if Christians were forbidden to force Jews to embrace the Catholic religion, to disturb their synagogues, their Sabbaths and their festivals, the Jews, on the other hand, were forbidden to hold public office, civil or military; and this prohibition extended even to the children of converted Jews. The precautionary decrees concerned the professions, education, and business positions."

Marranos

from the inside, can realize the necessity of the precaution underlined above. The word "Convert" is so often false.

One must learn from Jewish authorities that Torquemada himself, leading the Inquisition, was a Jew, and that the Inquisition was only aimed at the Marranos who under the pretense of conversion threatened to end Christianity by their inside job.

LUTHER and POPE INNOCENT III

Jewish authorities are well aware of the two phases in the teachings of Luther: the phase during which he wrote his drooling "Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew," filled with sympathy for their long unbelief, which Luther laid to the unsympathetic attitude of the Catholic Popes and hierarchy. Luther's study of the TALMUD became the dividing line. His second and last phase was one of warning against the Jews as destroyers of Christianity and of Christians. He preceded the world events created by the Red Beast regimes of Talmudists by more than 350 years. He reached an opinion in perfect unison with Pope Innocent III and the Popes of the centuries following him.

POPE INNOCENT III in a long decree stated: that Jews are "not to be killed by anyone," but "they are to us dangerous as the insect in the apple, as the serpent in the breast. . . . Since, therefore, they have already begun to gnaw like the rat, and to stink like the serpent, it is to our shame that the fire in our breast which is being eaten by them, does not consume them. . . . Altho Christian piety tolerates the Jews . . . and allows them to continue with us, altho the Moors will not tolerate them, they must not be allowed to remain ungrateful to us in such a way as to repay us with contumely for favors, and contempt for our familiarity. They are admitted to our familiarity only thru our mercy. . . ."

Under this same Pope, canons 67-70 were adopted by the Fourth Lateran Council which include protective measures against Jewish usury; their wearing of a distinguishing badge (to warn Christians against their mental leprosy); forbidding intercourse with Christians, as employees, in marriage, etc.; and barring their testimony as witnesses in legal matters (their KolNidre license for perjury then being well known) etc.

It is more than a little strange that the Bulls of the Popes over the many centuries, warning against the Jews, should be seemingly unknown to the Catholic clergy today, and that the writings of Luther on the same subject, which are like almost a second gospel to Protestants of the Lutheran fold, should be equally unknown today!

Luther's Shem Hamphorash

Where is Luther's reply to the Talmudic charge that Jesus did His miracles by magic with the Tetragrammaton, or Shem Hamphorash, the consonants of the word Jehovah (by which the Rabbis whistle up the demons)? He published it in 1543 and wrote:

"Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain . . . that the Jews, as they are today, are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over . . . to afflict the different nations with their usury, to spy upon others, and to betray, to poison wells, to deceive and to kidnap children, —in short, to practice all kinds of dishonesty and injury."

The Arab Charge

In the above underlined charge of Luther, we see modern substantiation in the report of the "ARAB HIGHER COMMITTEE FOR PALESTINE - 4512 Empire State Bldg., N.Y., N.Y., presented to the United Nations July 20, 1948. In the printed brochure, among such subtitles as the following, are details on well-poisoning: "Massacres, Indiscriminate Killing and Savage Acts"; Maltreatment and Humiliation of Prisoners"; "Indecent Acts Against Women and Girls"; Looting of Property"; "Destruction of Holy Places" (14 churches being shelled, used as arsenals, etc.) and later evidence showing the typical Talmudic acts, told me by a Christian priest, of intercourse on altars, defiling same with excreta, etc.

Under the heading: "Jews Resort to Bacteriological Warfare", is data concerning the outbreak of cholera in Egypt and Syria, "with some, but not conclusive evidence that Zionists were responsible", but positive evidence of their bacteriological laboratories in Palestine for such ends. The NBC reporter Leon Peason, in Paris, is quoted as reporting Jan. 12, 1948 that "the Jewish underground is preparing to launch bacteriological warfare against the Arabs", followed by official Egyptian evidence that the Gaza water supply of the Egyptians was poisoned by typhoid and dysentary germs by Jews who had confessed the job (p. 14). And there is more. One can assert positively that Talmudic doctrine sanctions and sanctifies such acts against "Goyim", cattle.

Luther, in his brochure, "The Jews and Their Lies" reveals his perception of the close affinity (and substance) of Talmudic Judaism with paganism; and his disdain for Talmudic idiocies is expressed in language only second in strength to that of Christ Himself.

Plato and Judaism

Plato and Aristotle are Talmudic idols. Plato's Republic uses a false religion to keep the slaves in subjection, but his real god is the sum of nature, presided over by the intelligences, spirits, like old Aristotles's ten boss Intelligences of the plane's (now the Ter Sephirot of the Talmudists' Cabala). God is a self-perking insensate agglomeration of spirit or matter-take your choice, as Marx did. Marx chose matter as eternal and spirit as an attribute of it; Plato took the "idea" as reality, like Christian Science and the Cabala, with "error" or sin, as unreal. "Evil a ccording to the Cabalistic philosophy, is non-existent, anticipating Christian Science.." ("Cabala", Universal Jewish Ency.). Hence we read in the same source of "the considerable number of Jews (who) have been attracted to this faith", and "have held that they did not necessarily desert Judaism by so doing". There is no gain in switching, says the Universal Jewish Ency., and the glorification of Jesus is the one repugnant feature warned against as non-Jewish ("Christian Science"). As the older Jewish Ency. states under "Cabala" (p. 477):

"As the divine" (small "d" in original, for it means the pantheistic sum of nature) "has true being, evil is that which has no being, the seeming thing, the thing as it appears". And one ASSERTS, declares one's own divinity; one does not ASK, either in Cabalism or so-called "Christian" "Science". Aristotle's bastard son, and the dressed up "heterai", or prostitutes, who popularized the pagan philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, and the entire peripatetic school of Athens, are examples of immoral conduct mirrored in the Talmud, but not in the Person of the Man of Galilee. Carefully buried are the old historical accounts cited by the French historian Lacroix (1806-84) (English translation by Samuel Putnam, 1931, CoviciFriede, N. Y.), in his "History of Prostitution". Aspasia, the heterai whom Pericles married and continued to share with Socrates and Alcibiades, carries on a revolting dialogue with Socrates and advises him how he can secure Alcibiades as his subject for sodomy. Plato's obscene poems; his mistress Archaenesse to whose wrinkles he wrote an ode; the degradation of little ohildren, outnumbering adults in paying the prostitute tax to the city of Rome as lesbians and sodomists, trained in that vice by their parents at the time of Christ—the sodomy of Horace and all his foul poems, make one realize the position of the LIGHT of the WORLD in a sewer of Talmudic paganism. The Talmudic role of little children today is the same as in Christ's time—subjects for vice—in direct opposition to that decreed by Christ.

Luther on Plate

Note the Jewish Ency. Exhibit 271 (last of right column, "Gentiles"): "Judah ben Ilai recommends the daily recital of the benediction, Blessed be thou...

who hast not made me a goy". This also has: "who hast not made me a woman", and also "who hast made me an Israelite... who hast not made me a slave". This is a "benediction" prescribed by the Talmud and listed under "Benedictions" (Jewish Ency.).

"For thus the historians write that the Greek PLATO daily gave such praise and thanks to God, if such blasphemy and haughtiness could be called the praise of God. For that man (Plato) also praised his gods for these three things, that he was a man and not an animal, a man and not a woman, a Greek and not a non-Greek or barbarian. Such is the praying of a fool and the praise of a blasphemous barbarian; just as the Mals imagine that they alone are human beings and all the rest of the world nothing but inhuman beings, ducks, or mice."

Luther Cites Christ-Esther

Luther quotes John 8:39 and verse 44, wherein Christ told the Pharisees: "Ye are of your father the Devil," and warns Christians to "be on their guard against these hardened condemned people—who accuse God of lying and proudly despise the whole world... They are boastful, proud fools.." He goes on to call them "Liars and Bloodhounds". The book of Esther, which Catholic and Protestant theologicans in all centuries have protested as being unhistorical, irreligious (the name of God does not once appear on it) and out of place in the Bible, Luther then cites. The Jewish Publication Society book on "PURIM ANTHOLOGY" (Phillip Goodman, 1949) points out the inconsistency of Persian-run nobles giving permission to Jews to slaughter Persians and calls attention to Purim having been a souse and gift festival of Babylonians celebrating the triumph of the Babylonian sex-gods Bel MARDUK (Mordechai) and ISHTAR or Astarte (Esther) over the rival sex-goddess Mashti (Vashti). In the Persian city of Susa the colony of Babylonians had celebrated this festival, which, we are told, was refurbished at the time of the Maccabees (168 BC) to put fight into their crowd. The victory of Judah the Maccabee over the Syrian general Nicanor was celebrated and the day declared a holiday, the 13th of Adar, 161 B.C. There is no mention of Purim in the New Testament, no certainty that a

king Ahasuerus mentioned in the book of Esther ever existed. How about a Godly heroine bearing a pagan sex-goddess' name? Luther wrote: "They are the real liars and bloodbounds, who have perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end without ceasing, with their interpretations. . .O, how they love that book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their revengeful people—they who imagine themselves to be the people of God, who desire to think they must murder and crush the heathen. . . As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do so now, if only they could. . ." Here, Luther anticipated the carnage of millions of Christians under the Talmudic Red Iron Curtain of today.

Jews-Worse than the Heathen

Luther reflects that passage in II Peter 2 about those who "speak great swelling words of vanity", promise liberty, but "they themselves are the servants of corruption... For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they had known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them... according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to its wallowing in the mire". Luther wrote:

"How much better it would be if they did not have God's Commandment or did not know it. For if they did not have it, they would be uncondemned. They are condemned because they have God's Commandment and do not keep it, but act against it without ceasing. . . In like manner murderers and whores, thieves and scoundrels and all evil men could boast they are God's holy and chosen people, because they have His Word and know that they should fear and obey him. . ."

Luther then knew the Talmud, and continues: "The heathen philosophers write much more honorably. . . They write that man by nature is obligated to serve others, also to keep his word to his enemies . . . Yea, I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of TAL-MUDISTS and Rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews. Should someone think I am saying too much—I am not saying too much, but much too little! For I see in their writings how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money thru usury. . . they play us all manner of mean tricks; what is worst of all, they. . . teach that such should be done. No HEATHEN has done such things and none would do so except the Devil himself, and those whom he possesses like he possesses the Jews".

Number Tricks

Luther goes into a dissertation showing he was familiar with the letter and number tricks, by which adding the numerical value of a word is used to create a new Talmudic meaning for Scriptural verses—devilish ones. Luther goes into the perversion of the name of Jesus. Christ foretold the numerical number of the Anti-Christ's name as 666, according to Pharisee custom now, as then (See under "Gematria, Notaricon Temura in Jewish authorities). Much of the "wisdom of the sages" depends on these number-letter tricks, which are utterly cheap shyster stunts.

Calling Mary a Whore

Luther continues with the Talmud: "Thus they call Him (Jesus) the child of a whore and His mother, Mary, a whore, whom she had in adultery. . . Reluctantly I must speak so coarsely in opposing the Devil. . . We do not call our wives whores as they call Maria, the Mother of Jesus; we do not call them bastards, as they call our Lord Christ. We do not curse them, but wish them all manner of bodily and spiritual good; permit them to lodge with us. We don't steal and mutilate their children; do not poison their water; do not thirst after their blood. . .

"Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us. Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1400 years ago and during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by Jews in all the world. For nearly 300 years we might well complain that during that time they captured and killed the Christians, which is the clear truth. On top of that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem. On top of that no one is holding them now. Land and highways are open to them. . . They are a heavy burden to us in our country, like a plague, pestilence, and nothing but misfortune. . . Should the Devil not laugh and dance, when in this manner he can have his paradise among us Christians . . . and to thank us . . . blasphemes and curses God and man! . . . Now what are we going to do with these rejected condemned Jewish people?"

Luther's Conclusions

After Luther became conversant with the TALMUD and the ritual cursings of so-called "Judaism", his advice exactly matched that of the ever-reenforced edicts of the beleagured Popes. A person who condones such blasphemies, he said, partakes of them. He said they should be forced to leave the country:

"We should not suffer it, after they are among us and we know about such lying," (Note: as authorized by the KolNidre, etc.) "blaspheming and cursing among them, lest we become partakers of their lies,

"FIRST, that we avoid their synagogues and schools and warn people against them. . . that God may see that we are Christians and have not knowingly tolerated such lying, cursing and blaspheming of His Son and His Christians. For what we have so far tolerated in ignorance (I myself did not know it), God will forgive us. . . Moses writes in Deuteronomy that where a city practiced idolatry, it should be entirely destroyed with fire and nothing left. If he were living today he would be the first to put fire to the Jew schools and houses" (—which he follows with Scriptural support).

"SECONDLY: That all of their books be taken away; prayer books, TALMUDS, and not one page of it be left. .. For they use all that only to blaspheme the Son of God; that is God Himself. . .and will never use it in any other way".

Spiritually, Luther connects the Jews with those who betrayed Moses: "Of such are the remaining dregs of the Jews, of whom Moses knows nothing; they also know nothing of him, for they do not keep one passage in Moses." This reminds one of the constantly recurring charge of Christ that the Pharisees violated and nullified the laws of Moses, such as: "The Scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses seat" (Matt. 23:2). In other words, they occupy his throne giving forth as Mosaic LAW, their own foul permissions which they attribute to "ORAL" laws Moses handed down to their own crowd unknown to the rest of the world, a thin lie recognized as such by the rabbis.

Without any Jewish Encyclopedias or Soncino translations of the Babylonian Talmud, one sees that Luther understood perfectly the way the Talmud blasphemes and hangs obscene charges on Christ thru double talk and words (The Balaam passages are an example of this, but Luther names others). Luther recognized that any Messiah expected by Jewry was only to lead them in slaughter to power:

"The Jews desire no more from their Messiah than that he should be a Kochba" (leader of the Pharisee revolt against Rome in 135 AD in which about a million non-Jews were sadistically slaughtered, details being cited by historian Gibbon, from ancient historical sources. E.D.)—"and a worldly king, who would slay 'he Christians, divide the world among the Jews and nake them rich lords..."

It is clear that Luther knew the MARRANOS, the Spanish word meaning "swine", of which Talmudists are so proud, because it designated the some 300,000

Talmudists who deliberately invaded the Catholic Church of Spain in order to accomplish what they did accomplish, and this they call the "Golden Age" of Jewry, which was the complete take-over of church and state, financial, educational, and ecclesiastic, to the helpless wrath of the subject Spanish Christians. Only the Inquisition directed against Talmudic tumors within the Church saved Christianity from extinction—as Talmudists so well know today. Read Cecil Roth's "Marranos" (Jewish Pub. Soc. of Am.)

The two-volume "House of Nasi" by the same able current Jewish author, compares the underground refunnelings of Jewry after the expulsion from Spain (1492) and Portugal, a little later, with the network set up under Hitler. "Nasi" means Prince of Jewry. MAIMONIDES, whose "harmonizing" of pagan Aristotle with the Pharisaic pantheistic "Bible" is the idol of the Jewish world, was one of that vast horde of Talmudists who invaded Mohammedanism as a "convert", and lived the pose of a Mohammedan while he wrote Talmudic books ("Guide to the Perplexed", etc.).

In 1955, Jewry has been celebrating the anniversary of Maimonides, whose intitials, Rabbi Moses Ben Maimon are turned into that favorite "NRA". "UNRRA" "UNO", alphabetical jargon favored by Jewry in Russia and the USA, so that he is referred to as RAMBAM. His wholesale deception, his role as a confidence man, is greatly admired and, as usual, attributed, by that stock pose of the persecutors, to "persecution". He was born in Cordova, Spain, 1135, and moved to Fez, Morocco, in 1160, a "convert".

Digressing from Luther's "The Jews and Their Lies", we see in his "Table Talk" his reaction to marranoism:

"If a Jew, not converted at heart, were to ask baptism at my hands, I would take him on to the bridge, tie a stone round his neck, and hurl him into the river; for these wretches are wont to make a jest of our religion" (CCLVI).

Luther's diatribes at the papacy, at a time when the Medici popes were more Talmudic than the Talmudists themselves, apply with equal force to Talmudized Christian denominations and leaders, such as the Oxmans and McConnells, today. Protestantism has been corrupted by the same satanic influence. As Jewish historian Roth states in his "Jews of Italy" (1946, Jewish Pub. Soc. of Am.) concerning Jews and the Medici:

Medicis and Jews

the Medici were driven out in 1527 they accompanied them. . It was only when the ruling house was at last securely established, from 1530 onwards, that the interruptions end and the continuous history of Florentine Jewry begins" (p. 190).

Also: "When Martin Luther nailed up his famous Theses on the cathedral door of Wittenberg, thereby setting the machinery of the Reformation in motion, the fate of the eager Jewries of Renaissance Italy were sealed. Threatened by this dangerous movement of secession, the Catholic Church began to set its house in order, more systematically and more comprehensively than ever before, in the process known as the Counter-Reformation. No longer were the Popes to be pre-eminently enlightened patrons of literature, science and the arts, with worldly inclinations and interests. Henceforth they were chosen among those in whose eyes the requirements of the Church, spiritual and temporal, were paramount. . who. . regarded the Jews as a leaven of disbelief which positively endangered Christianity and Christendom—at least until they were segregated from intercourse with other men, as the Lateran Councils had prescribed three and a half centuries before". Whereas the Talmud had been printed under Leo X, a Medici, in 1553, the Pope denounced the Talmud, and the other restrictions were set up ("History of the Jews of Italy", pp. 190-following).

The ALENU, or the Spitting Jew

It is evident that Luther knew of the custom, wherever it did not endanger Jews, of spitting in the synagogue when reference to Christianity is sung in the ALENU, for he advised:

"Whenever you see or think about a Jew, say to yourself as follows: Behold, the mouth which I see there has every Saturday cursed, execrated, and spit upon my dear Lord, Jesus Christ, who has redeemed mo with His precious blood; and also prayed and cursed before God that I, my wife and children, and all Christians, should be stabbed and perish in the most miserable manner—and would like to do so himself if he could, that he might come into possession of our goods. . Should I eat, drink with, or speak to such a Devilish mouth?. . I would partake of all the Devils who live in that Jew, and would spit upon the precious blood of Christ—God keep me from doing that".

Repeatedly, Luther warns the clergy against participation in the blasphemies of Judaism, by aiding or enduring these in any way. His last sermon includes this: "You, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ;

they call our Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and Her Son a bastard. . .if they could kill us all, they would gladly do so; in fact many of them murder Christians, especially those professing to be surgeons and doctors. They know how to deal with medicaments in the manner of the Italians—the Borgias and Medicis—who gave people poison which brought about their death in one hour or a month. . .As a good patriot I wanted to give you this warning for the very last time to deter you from participating in alien sins. You must know I only desire the best for you all, rulers and subjects."

But, typically, as this is being written, a professor at the Lutheran Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, scornfully replied to my query as to what is being taught there about the dangers of the Talmud to Christian life,—that this subject had nothing to do with modern life. "It is only responsible for our whole foreign policy with our boys stationed on some 300 world bases to set up Anti-Christ World Government in accordance with prophecy", said I, as he added that he would refuse to read any proofs I might submit to him on the subject. The "higher-ups" paid no attention to even the Divine One when He came with His Gospel of Truth: one had a new piece of land he had to attend to; another had a new wife—they were too busy. This gentleman was too busy to study the findings of Luther in whose honor his seminary was set up.

Astrology, the Oldest Paganism

A glance at Chicago newspapers reveals the fact that, today, "moderns" have not abandoned the oldest idolatry—Sabeanism, or worship of the stars: the seven planets, sun, moon, to which Talmudism has always been addicted, along with every other form of paganism, like the horrors of Molech child-burning and Baal depravities. The fulminations of the Old Testament mean nothing today, any more than the opinions of Luther on this astrology:

After expressing his profound respect for astronomy, he said: "Astrology is no art; it has no principle, no demonstration whereupon we may take sure footing; 'tis all haphazard work... They set forth in their almanacs, that we shall have no snow in summer, nor thunder in winter; and this the country knows as well as the astrologers. Philip Melanethon says: That such people as are born in the ... ascension of Liber towards the south, are unfortunate people. Whereupon I said: the astrologers are silly creatures to dream that their crosses and mishaps proceed not from God, but from the stars. . The nativities of Cicero and of others were shown me. I said: I hold nothing thereof, nor attribute anything to them. I would gladly have the astrologers answer me this: Esau and Jacob were born together, of one father and one mother, at one time,

and under equal planets, yet they were wholly of contrary natures, kinds and minds. What is done by God ought not to be ascribed to the stars. The upright and true Christian religion opposes and confutes all such fables... An Astrologer, or horoscope monger, is like one that sells dice, and bawls: Behold, here I have dice that always come up twelve. If once or twice their conjectures tell, they cannot sufficiently extol the art; but as to the infinite cases where they fail, they are altogether silent. Astronomy, on the other hand I like... by reason of its manifold benefits...

"When at one time many are slain together in a battle, no man can affirm they were all born under one planet, yet they die altogether in one hour, yea, in one moment" ("Table Talk"; "Of Astronomy and Astrology" DCCCXLI).

PURIM TODAY

Strangely, the features of the Babylonian souse and gift-giving festival of Farvardigan, in honor of the sexgods of the Babylonians, have been retained by the Talmudists today. In the oldest translation of the Old Testament the festival is called Fruria (the Septuagint translation), whereas Purim, meaning "lots", refers to the lots cast by Haman to decide on the day to get after "Jews", as we are supposed to believe.

Catholic and Protestant Bible students have argued against both the historicity and the religious value of the book of Esther. Even the Schofield Bible notes, and the Schofield Bible notes unfailingly identify the present day pagan Talmudists with the "Israel" followers of the Prophets and Him they foretold, even these cite the fact that the name of God does not once appear in the book of Esther. The Kirkbride Bible notes go further. Elsewhere we learn that the gods of Elam, a province east of Persia of which Susa, the scene of the Esther story, was the eapitol, were Humman (Haman) and Mashti (Vashti) and these were rivals of Bel (Baal) Marduk (Mordechai) and Ishtar (Astarte), the male and female sex-gods of the Babylonians whose holiday the Jews adopted. Whereas archaelogical discoveries all over the world have confirmed the reality of the Flood, and of practically every Biblical event, including the invasion of Canaan by the Mosaic congregation from Egypt (in the Tel El Amarna letters), there is not one piece of historical substantiation for the slaughter of Persians by Jews which allegedly took place by permission of the enamored but unknown king "Ahasuerus" in behalf of his lady with the pagan name, Ishtar. That Mordechai was a professing Jew yet no one suspected his daughter (Jewish sources say wife) by adoption, his niece

might be Jewish, is another unlikely feature. If the supposed happenings actually took place at the time of the prophet Ezra, if Artaxerxes was the real name of Ahasuerus, then it is strange that neither he nor any other Biblical source makes any mention of this event. And the very earliest mention of Purim is in II Maccabees 15: 37, of the second century BC, in which, because of the victory of Judah Maccabeus over Nicanor the Syrian general, a day of celebration was declared, called then "Mardochias' day", on the 13th day of the month of Adar (Babylonian calendar, which is today the "Jewish" calendar). This victory is recorded in I Maccabees 7:43, and the day, 13th of Adar, declared a holiday (verse 48).

The Babylonian souse festival of the sex-gods, Farvardigan, in Susa, fell on the 14th day of Adar, the end of winter. Purim today falls on the 18th, 14th and 15th of Adar (see current synagogue calendars). In the Apocryphal book of Esther, Haman is called a Macedonian or Greek and the king Artaxerxes.

Christian Message of Esther

Altho Christians deplore the purely secular Godless character of the Esther book, its justice being done by purely human means, it mirrors the care of God for those who aim to serve Him, and it repeats in a form, the 'terrible day of the Lord', when the earth shall be cleansed of the Babylonian Satanism fore-told to culminate in the seventh and last world government, now rising. Down the ages that message has rung alongside of the first and second Advents of the Messiah, Christ. The Babylonian Talmudists, of course, dismiss that fall of "Babylon the Great" (Rev.17 and also the Old Testament, before it was foretold by Christ in 96 AD) as a myth. Babylon is to be immune in every sense, says the Talmud. Babylon in the Bib¹ical sense is a world-wide power, an absolutism of dictatorship of which Stalinism-Leninism is but the forerunner. Babylon is adored for all that it stands for in moral filth, by the Talmud.

The 12th Month, Adar

Purim, in the modern and ancient Babylonian calendar of the Babylonian Talmudists is in Adar, the 12th month, and the celebration falls on the 12th, 13th and 14th of the month, corresponding with February or March of our solar calendar. The Babylonian lumar cal-

After the slaughter of non-Jews, recorded in Esther, "the Jews who were at Shushan," (the palace city of Elam, then Persia, which was called Susiana) "assembled together on the 13th day thereof, and on the 14th thereof; and on the 15th day of the same they rested and made it a day of gladness" (Esther 9:18).

The lateness of Purim customs is recorded in all Talmudic sources, but for the drunkenness expected we read: "even the TALMUD remarks that one should drink so much that he can not distinguish between 'Cursed be Haman' and 'Blessed be Mordechai' (Megillah 7b)". Megillah, meaning a single or small scroll, came to mean solely the book of Esther in Talmudic usage. The same source just mentioned (Universal Jewish Ency., "Purim") states: "Many scholars assert that Purim is based on a Persian festival called FRAWARDIN" (spelled "Farvarigan" in the "Purim Anthology" by Goodman, before quoted), "but this furnishes no parallels and presents difficulties as regards the name. . . Of greater probability is the association of Purim with the Babylonian New Year festival, Zagmuk, and with the presumably related myth which tells of the struggles between MARDUK, the chief Babylonian god, and the Elamite deity, HUMMAN. . . other figures in the Esther story, such as VASHTI and ZERESH the wife of Haman are reminiscent of such figures as ISHTAR, VASHTI, and KIRISHA in Babylonian and Elamite mythology.

"Furthermore, in the ZAGMUK festival there were such elements as the casting of LOTS, wailing and jubilation, and great banquets and drinking bouts at which intoxication often occurred. However,...the origin and development of...Purim, as well as...customs and practices of this festival still remain altogether obscure".

"Since PURIM was the festival of deliverance, its name was given to other occasions of deliverance observed by communities or by individual families".

Such Purim celebrations follow as the "Purim of Shiraz," because an accuser of the Jews died leaving a "confession" his charges were "false", "Purim of Cairo", because an accuser of the Jews was conveniently assassinated, etc., etc.

"Glamorous Purim Formula" (Exh. 299)

What makes Purim "the gayest in the Jewish calendar...the most glamorous of the Jewish holidays", as Rabbi Spitz repeats in the American Hebrew (3/1/46) article reproduced as Exhibit 299? Because it heralds the time of "Jacob's trouble" when Christians and all

dissenting non- Talmudists can be exterminated, slaughtered, and ground to bits as can be done now only behind the protective Iron Curtain which alone makes such sadism possible. His sub-title is:

"EXTERMINATE ANTI-SEMITIC TERMITES AS OUR ANCESTORS DID 2,500 YEARS AGO". And Spitz ends on that Talmudic note of jubilation, gloating in blood-lust which has but increased since it put Christ to the torture and attempted to finish off His Disciples as well:

"American Jews too must come to grips with our contemporary anti-Semites. We must fill our jails with anti-Semitic gangsters, we must fill our insane asylums with anti-Semitic lunatics, we must combat every alien Jew-hater, we must harass and prosecute our Jew baiters to the extreme limits of the laws, we must humble and shame our anti-Semitic hoodlums to such an extent that none will wish to dare to become 'fellow travelers'." And the very term "anti-Semitic" puts the stamp of the "Father of Lies", which Christ used against this "synagogue of Satan", for it is false from the beginning to end. The first descendants of Judah who founded the tribe of Judah, to which modern Talmudists never belonged by geneaogy, by tribe or by religious faith, were products of the non-Semitic Hamite, the daughter of Shuah the Canaanite (Gen. 38). As a tribe they were mixed from the start, racially. Spiritually, they largely followed the paganism surrounding them, with but a remnant holding to God and His teachings.

Happy Happy Day! Hurray!

The spirit of Purim is: "Happy, Happy Day-Hurray!" And it requires a whole volume of over 500 pages to tell of the worldwide customs of Purim. In Russia, we are told, the wife throws a stick of wood on the floor, and she and her husband kick it as a symbol of Haman until they throw it in the stove and burn it!

"Groggers" or noisemakers, are used to rasp and fill the synagogues with loud noises at every mention of Haman when the book of Esther is read on Purim.

"Adloyada" is the Bacchanalian cry of Purim (p.82) which means "UNTIL", or we must souse UNTIL we cannot tell the difference between "Blessed be Mordechai" and "Cursed be Haman", the Talmud doctrine for the event (Megillah 7b).

"The Rabbis teach that in future, in the days of the Messiah, ALL SCRIPTURE WILL BE ABOLISHED EXCEPT THE BOOK OF ESTHER, also ALL FESTIVALS EXCEPT the feast of PURIM. (See Meno-

rath Hamaar, folio 135, column 1)." (p. 155).

Burning Haman and his sons in effigy in the synagogues where wax images were placed, is another typical custom of Purim.

"The beating of Haman", says "Purim Anthology", was "an early feature" of Purim, and suggests that it may have been taken over from the beating in the pagan festivities in which the FOOL was made king for the day. "Hanging Haman in effigy soon turned into a popular sport and on several occasions brought trouble to the Jewish community". The "blood-lust", shown in the reading of how many thousands the Jews killed, which Christians have complained of, the same authority continues, was justified. Again, it is the Christians who are wrong, as usual (pp. 11-12).

In Palestine Today

Now at last, with the Babylonian Talmudists in control of Palestine, a really joyous Purim celebration can be held. The whole city of TelAviv takes part, and joy can be "unrefined", this and other Jewish authorities state.

Parodies on the whole Old Testament are a Purim feature. Solomon and his wives drive thru the streets in caricature. Back to good old times, plus.

Why are the Purim festivals so much duller now than in other years, is a question answered by a rabbinical authority: "The explanation is simple...the change has arisen thru...disinclination from pranks that may be misconstrued as tokens of vindictiveness against an ancient foe or his MODERN REINCARNATION... Fortunately, this tendency of which Israel Abrahams complains is being arrested in the more normalized and freer atmosphere...in ISRAEL...where the Jewish community is unhampered in the expression of its Jewish feelings and spirit" (Purim Anthology", p. 329).

Grinding Haman

Drunken Songs and Stories

The vast array of drunken poems, stories and plays

celebrating Purim must be read to appreciate the above "Jewish spirit", so well carried out under Communism. Just as the book of "Makkoth" (beatings) ranks with Sanhedrin as the "chief repository of the criminal law of the Tahmud" (Exh. 43), we read of the origin of a favorite Purim dish "Krepah" (dough filled with chopped meat): "On the Day of Atonement men are flogged with forty stripes. Willow branches are beaten on Hosh'ana Rabba. During the reading of the book of Esther on Purim, Haman is beaten whenever his name is mentioned. . Purim shares Kreplah with two other significant days in the Jewish calendar—the eve of the Day of Atonement and Hosh'ana Rabba" (p.416).

A favorite parody is "The Drunkard's Chain of Tradition" in which the Bottle is supreme (p. 336). Another: "Said Rabbi Bakbuk (Bottle): Whosoever drinks wine on Purim, and becomes as intoxicated as Noah the Righteous, will be protected the rest of the year from the evil effects of bad water...Rabbi Hamram (Wine Dealer) said: Why did the eyes of Isaac our forefather grow dim sooner than those of any other Patriarch? Because all his life he busied himself with nothing but digging wells...and never planted even one vineyard'. The same note runs thru the whole parody. It is one long eulogy of wine and those who drink it to excess on Purim" (p. 344). One Purim favorite poem is typical:

The cup of penitence at Purim tide,
And flees the hermits with drunkards to
bide—Howling thru the night. . .

"Your praise, my friends, aloud I'll cry
If ne'er the wine in my cup go dry.
With brimful jugs of beer we'll try
To get drunk tonight.

"Red wine I prize as meed,
White wine is good in time of need,
But the water-drinker I hate, indeed,
As the dense darkness of the night. . .

"A holy deed I teach you, hear!
Men of wisdom, incline your ear!
Keep your house of water clear,
"Tis as bad as the night".

And, there is more of same

PYTHAGORAS—NUMEROLOGY—PAGANISM Exh. 72—3, 288

Numbers are supposed to be endowed with creative spirits. The pagan did not adore sticks and stones.

These were but the symbols of spirit powers the pagan solicited for personal benefits. Giving numbers to letters in Talmudism is called "Gematria" and a whole world of nutty and devilish meanings is evolved by this means. When all these "other gods" are solicited, the first of the Ten Commandments is broken— and it was a good commandment for more than one reason. Dealing with the Spirit World makes it possible for the Gangster Spirits to confuse, and mislead, and enslave one. Countless occulists have discovered that the hard way.

Wherever one turns in modern Jewish authorities, the name of Pythagoras appears as the source of various features of Cabalistic Talmudism we suckers call "Judaism". No Christain is permitted to learn that polytheistic atheism, or pantheism, is the religion which pretends to be based upon the Old Testament, as it is NOT.

Since the Talmud teaches that this world was created by the Hebrew LETTERS, and this lore is ascribed to Pythagoras and Babylonian witchcraft (see above Exhibits), the man and his work are of basic importance. Sex procreation, as in all paganism, was worshipped as Creation. The gods of sex were the gods of earth: the Sun, the male, and the Moon, symbol of the Female, with innumerable lesser spirits running everything, from their own private blade of grass to the Planets. Only seven planets were included, with their Boss Spirits, which added to the Sun and Moon and the over-all, made up the heavens of Aristotle under their "Ten Intelligences". These are renamed the "Ten Sephirot" by Cabalistic Judaism. New names, old ideas; Biblical jargon, anti-Biblical paganism.

Pythagoras, Master of Sorcery, Dictatorship

The pagan Pythagoras, ancient historians tell us, lived about 540 B.C. He spent 22 years being initiated into Egyptian sorcery (condemned by the Bible) in connection with the sex-goddess ISIS, elsewhere called Mylitta, Venus, Astarte, etc. "A hundred times the risk of death was incurred, especially if one's object was to gain control over occult forces. He mastered sacred mathematics" (always connected with ancient witchcraft) "and the science of numbers, or universal principles, which he made the basis of his system... "The science of numbers and the art of willpower', said the priests of Memphis, 'are the two keys of magic'".

Pythagoras also spent 12 years in Babylon. There: "To evoke spirits they employed graduated formulas, borrowed from the most ancient languages on earth. The following is the psychic reason they themselves gave thereof: 'Make no change in the barbarous names employed in evocation: for they are the

pantheistic names of God; they are magnetized with the worship of multitudes; and their power is ineffable'" (The Oracles of Zoraster, from the theurgy of Proclus). That is current Judaism exactly. The names cooked up from the letters of the Name of God, Y-H-W-H, or Tetragramaton, in 14, 42, 72 combinations are used to evoke spirits, and the spirits represented by that Name are supposed to have created the world out of the pantheistic substance called "God"—the unseeing, unknowing, unknowable mass called the "En Sof". Is that Biblical? Certainly NOT. It is, admittedly, Pythagorian, Babylonian, pagan. The difference between pagan pantheism and the world of the Bible is that the pagan world is a composite of spirits and manifestations of a mass of spirit or matter without a Chief Engineer, without a Supreme Intelligence. The God of the Bible is Supreme Intelligence and the spirits are but the little rats and mice playing around His great basement.

Pythagoras and Apollo

Then: "After an absence of 34 years, Pythagoras returned to Samos...His work was greater and more mysterious; it was to rouse to life the slumbering soul of the gods in the sanctuaries, to restore the temple of APOLLO to its former might and prestige, and then found...a school of science and of life whence should come forth...men and women initiates".

Again: "In Orphic thought, Dionysus" (Note: Bacchus, god of sex and wine) "and Apollo were two revelations of the same divinity...we find in Apollo the solar Logos, the universal Word...the Vishnu of the Hindus, the MITHRAS of the Persians, and the Horus of the Egyptians.. In antiquity, a strong tie united divination to the solar cults, and here we have the golden key to all so-called magic mysteries... Mithras is the male fire and Mitra the female light... In the crypts of Egypt the initiates seek the same sun under the name of Osiris". Yes, and you will see by ploughing thru the Jewish encyclopedias that the Boss Spirit of the world in Talmudism is MITHRA the Sun God who is called "METATRON" and associated with Horus. If the God of the Bible is described at all—for He is dogmatically in a serious vein called the unknowing and unknowable substance—he is represented as a silly old man with big feet splashing around with the huge leviathin fish and teaching the unborn children Torah part of the day, but Metatron boss of all spirits, and earthly affairs, teaches them the rest of the day—the biggest part—and they forget it all when born. While the inner circle of adepts are doing the Mercabah "riding" to see in "ecstacies" induced by dope "and other means," besides incantations, the vision of Mithra, the Sun God, renamed "Metatron", the whole Talmudic world is "Greeting the

Sun" every 28-year cycle, as it did in 1953 and as the Jews of New York did in Tomkins Square, in 1897.

Sun, Moon and Sex

Ezekiel Might Repeat

About 594 BC, before the finish of the Judah kingdom and temple in 586, the Prophet Ezekiel warned the Judaites in vain. Chapter 8 tells us how he was taken in a vision to the Jerusalem Temple: "and behold, there sat women weeping for TAMMUZ... and behold, at the door of the temple of the Lord...were about five and twenty men with their...faces toward the east; and they worshipped the SUN toward the east." And this is denounced as ABOMINATION.

Today, you may read of the superstitious rites in conjunction with the monthly New Moon Day, and in the codified law of Talmudism, the Shulhan Aruch of Joseph Caro, of the Fast of Tammuz when it is advantageous to hire wailers. As in pagan times no marriages may be performed during this time. What would Ezekiel say today were he to write his vision of the "synagogue of Satan", as Christ called it (Rev 2:9; 3:9) with its celebrations of Sun and Moon, its Fast of Tammuz, its sex filth?

Pythagoras and Communism

Pythagoras lived in Croton 30 years, organized a Communistic community. He also organized a super-Commissariat of the Three Hundred recruited from his initiates. A bloody revolution overthrew his aristocratic occult power, his Super-State. He and his leading followers were killed by the irate citizenry who also expelled the rest of his pupils from all the towns of Southern Italy they ruled. Cyclon, the leader of the democratic revolution, called the Pythagorean religion a "crime against liberty". Pythagoras he called: "the tyrant of Croton. the worst of tyrants, an occult one. What else than scorn and disdain for the people is this indissoluble friendship which unites all the members of the Pythagorean cult composed of? They are never tired of repeating the words of Homer when he says the prince should be the shepherd of the people. In their eyes the people are evidently nothing better than a worthless flock" (Note: which is the same idea as the Talmudic designation of all others as "The people who are like an ass—slaves who considered the property of the master").

"The very existence of the order, I say, is a permanent conspiracy against the people. Until it is destroyed liberty will be a vain word in Croton". Pythagora; and his leaders were killed by the people but the remnants of the order spread thruout Greece and Sicily. Today, admittedly, its doctrines flourish in the Cabala of Judaism and its leading Cabalistic set of books, the ZOHAR.

Pythagoras and Cabala

As the pagan melee of Pythagorianism is unfolded, the same Cabalistic concepts of the current Jewish Cabala are seen: man as a miniature universe, or microcesm, within the larger macrocosm or Adam Kadmon of the Cabala; the Souls of the Planets or Astrology; Theosophy or transmigration of souls: "the ascensional life of the soul thru series of existences is the common feature of esoteric traditions and the crown of theosophy", to quote, and the return into the mass, the "En Sof" is the destination of the soul in the Cabala in which: "Evil...has only an apparent existence". Pythagoras, the master, "to crown his teaching demonstrated to them how eternal Truth is manifested in the union of man and woman in marriage. The beauty of the sacred numbers... they were about to recognize at the very heart of life, for them God was reflected in the great mystery of Sex and Love". Data taken from "Pythagoras and the Delphic Mysteries", by Eduard Schure, Wm. Riderson, London, 1923, is corroborated by other historians and Jewish authorities today.

The Ten Sephirot, or intelligences of the Cabala, are designed as male and female procreative agencies: "Kether", or "Crown" or the "I AM" emanates the "masculine or male potency", and from this "the feminine or passive potency. The union of the masculine and feminine potencies. produced again", and so the fantastically named male and female Sephirot spawn along: "Thus each triad is compounded of force, counter-force, and their connecting link: namely active and passive agents and combination"—which is a good picture also of Karl Marx dialectical materialism and its self-perking universe leading to Jewish rule hiding behind the disguise, "the dictatorship of the PROLETARIAT" (the Talmudist)—"They were all combined in the Adam Kadmon ('Primordinal man')" (Jewish Ency. "Sefirot, Ten").

Number "Magic" of Pythagoras

Concerning Pythagoras' system of numbers: "Lack of order was synonymous with non-existence since it was indescribable and hence unknowable. . . the abstractly mathematical, because it was the most perfectly ordered, was the very essence of being. Thus numbers themselves were the primordia of all things: the active or male principle was the number one; the passive or female principle was the number two; marriage or the union of the dual forces was the number three; and so on until one number explained a horse, another a man, a third justice—which some Pythagorians held to

More "Vain Babblings"

"Having exalted abstract numbers to an existence above the transcient flux of the material world, the Pythagoreans...sought to establish all social sanctions in mathematical harmonies and proportions, and, like the Athenians, attempted to impose this 'truth' upon their neighbors by fire, knife and other forcible means in the conviction that it was their duty to 'free' their fellow men from 'injustice' by forcing them into the Pythagorean union represented by Croton, Sybaris, Catana, Rhegium and other towns of Sicily and Southern Italy. If the people of Croton believed that to be conquered and told how to order their lives according to the supernal mystical numbers was a loss of freedom it was only because they were abysmally ignorant".

The "Play's" Cast Today

"Before he began to develop a philosophy of his own, PLATO was a PYTHAGOREAN...he had woven together the Pythagorean belief in the primacy of numbers...to form his own philosophic system... nowhere simply or consistently set forth, but deviously expounded throughout the 'Dialogues'...he was enthralled by the 'WISE SOUL'—the god-in-man in the person of SOCRATES. With the aid of this 'clever ghost' he ultimately explained away the whole of observable nature as a mirage of ERROR."

"In Platonic philosophy it is the 'WISE SOUL' which perceives. However, untutored by Plato, it perceives erroneously. Things as they appear to the uninstructed soul are in greater or lesser degrees misleading, illusory, chimerical: at one extreme is mere appearance, which is identical with complete ignorance, at the other extreme is knowledge, which is to be equated with pure truth or reality; and in between is opinion, which is a varying mixture of ignorance and truth. Since that which is wholly false and illusory cannot exist, ignorance is non-being; while knowledge is identical with being, since that which

is true must also be real. Since what is true must always be true, truth is absolute-changeless and eternal—and is indeed the open reality. . ." Note: there is nothing in the strained "scholarship" of the Babylonian Talmudists and their "culture", or in our institutions of "higher learning" which they have taken over, that was not current and known to the Apostles. Plato lived in his world of "intellectual" heterai, or prostitutes, strutting about in sodomy, abandoned children and smug superiority, 429-847 years before Christ.

Plato's Talmudic "Republic"

In Soviet Russia and its satellites we see the largest application of the "Republic" of Plato. To again quote: "As in its beginnings, so to its ultimate application, Plato's philosophy was concerned with politics and social sanctions, and in his masterpiece, 'the Republic', he constructed a perfect state which would bring about the perfect life, and function as an organ of justice, even as the 'WISE-SOUL' is an organ of justice in the individual body.

"Again he follows the Pythagorean system in developing a special ruling and possessing class...". Here we see the "humans", the Talmudists, who aim to rule the animal world, and to liquidate, as is being done by the millions today, all dissenters who are unsatisfactory as "the people who are like an ass—slaves who are considered the property of the master" (Talmudist), which is the basic doctrine of Talmudism and the dynamic of its political weapon, COMMUNISM. The phony titles of the ruling Kagonovitch, Jake Berman, Ana Pauker, Leon Blum, Jules Moch, Bela Kun, etc, "humans", of "dictatorship OF the proletariat" do not alter the nature of "the rose", which is the dictatorship Over the proletariat, or "people who are like an ass". Not "OF" but "OVER".

Birth Control

Resuming the above item on Plato's Republic: "Women are to be allowed to breed from their 20th to their 40th, men from their 30th to their 50th years, warriors being given the greatest sexual freedom so that the most children would be born of their stock. Altho intercourse is to be FREE beyond these age limits, abortion or infanticide is to be used to prevent the offspring from growing up. In all cases in which children are permitted to survive they are to be taken from their elders, since paternal influence is usually REACTIONARY and adverse".

Here is seen the hordes of little tots in state orphanages in Russia, the ones five and six years old going around in our tourist party at Tsarkoyselo (summer home of the Czar near Leningrad), naked from the waist up, begging in acquired English, with outstretched skinny hands: "Gimme a cigarette?". I see the guides at the Palestine communist cooperative farms, "kibbutz", showing us the house where small children and the one where the older children, and another where the babies, were kept in communal nurseries and buildings while mothers worked in the fields, Soviet style. For "Israel" is a vast training school for "humans" as managers of future "barns" for "the people who are like an ass". Marxian Communism—Socialism is totalitarian because Marx was a Talmudic Jew enunciating Talmudic doctrine, aims and program. To destroy Communism, under whatever name—"free world" or what-have-you, it is necessary to destroy the Talmudic religion and all of its organized forces conspiring against humanity, as the Pythagoreans conspired, inspired by their practice of demonism, satanism.

Chad Gadyah and Birth Control, Exh. 152

That Passover song, Chad Gadyah (the "Only Kid") heralds the day, after one nation has devoured another (in accordance with Daniel's prophecies: Dan 7:23-, etc.), when only the Talmudist or self-styled "ISRAEL", is left! The Talmud book of Yebamoth 12b, harangues about the ages when birth control may be exercised: "From the age of eleven years and one day until the age of twelve years and one day" (a year);the pregnant woman might have a "second conception" which would make her foetus a "sandal" or "flat fish", etc. Read the nonsense, followed by the "two hairs" test.

Karl Marx-Plato's Copy Cat

Continuing the above quotation on Plato's "ideal" Republic, one hears the voice of the Talmudic Karl Marx thundering in his COMMUNIST MANIFESTO for: "Abolition of the family!...The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course...with the vanishing of capital. The bourgeois "(middle class)" claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting..." (And he makes it all an economic matter). He continues: "But you Communists would introduce a community of women" (and the USSR at first openly did so) "...Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters of their proletariat at their disposal, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's wives... Bourgeois marriage is in reality a system of wives in common, and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be repreached with is that they desire to introduce...an

openly legalized community of women" (pp.27-8, Communist Manifesto). And PLATO the pagan:

"THE FAMILY IS TO BE ABOLISHED AND INFANTS ARE TO BE RAISED IN A PUBLIC CRECHE AND LATER EDUCATED BY THE STATE, and then assigned to the various tasks for which they are best fitted"—in other words, the penitentiary state, universal draft, federal education, from the kibbutz to the battlefield. And, to continue: "those of aristocratic" (for Plato's aristocratic, read proletarian) "birth are to be given further training in preparation for becoming rulers, Those who fail to qualify are to be made auxiliaries of government, officers and clerks, while those who succeed will continue into the higher studies of the PHILOSOPHY of the state...who shall become the 'guards' or rulers of the state".

The Little Jew and the Big Atheist Einsteins

"Since men are by nature acquisitive, jealous, combative, erotic and generally not to be trusted, how can they be expected to enter into such a scheme of things? How can those who fail to qualify be reconciled to a subordinate place? Will not jealousies and disappointments be the seed of discontent and of ultimate revolution?

"PLATO foresaw this difficulty and devised an answer. He believed that a state could not be strong and unified unless it believed in a god. A mere 'cosmic force' a 'first cause' that was not a personal deity" (Note: like the "En Sof" of the Einstein Talmudists) "could not inspire hope or devotion . . . or restrain greed and passion. The social force of a belief in a god is enhanced when it is joined with a belief in personal immortality. Granted that such beliefs cannot be demonstrated, and may be false, they will, he argued, do no harm and may do immeasurable good.

"So he suggested that the children of the state be taught to believe in an afterlife and in a just and punishing god merely as a political expediency. It could be pointed out to them that the god had made men differently, some of gold, some of silver, some of brass, and some of iron; the oracle of the god could constantly proclaim that when a man of iron tried to rule the state, he would be destroyed. By this and similar strategems the populace could be kept subservient to the guards, who could presumably change the strategems from time to time as the need arose.

"JUSTICE...turned out in PLATO'S REPUBLIC to consist of the freezing for all time of aristocratic privilege..." Note: This is what the Talmudist hopes to do by subjugating the world by means of little Jews fed on the pageantry of "prayers" to an unknowing "En Sof", the rigamarole of being "Chosen People"

providing they carry out the schemes, the daily "line", of their top "Guards" who, like Einstein and the Jewish Theological Seminary, which honored him and worked with him, an avowed atheist, look down upon the little followers of their "religion", a stage show draped with the myth that it is the Old Testament religion; the truth being that it is a merciless "synagogue of Satan", as unsparing of the disobedient "Jew" as of the "animal" non-Jew. Today, as always, there is nothing "democratic" about the structure of the "synagogue of Satan" which has never rescinded the death penalty for its informers, the "MOSER" (plural, Moserim), who alert the "animal" victimsto-be. The AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE "tells 'em"; it does not "ask 'em," and recalcitrants are as ineffective against political and economic boycott and pressure as a screaming tot asserting he is NOT going to take his nap en route to taking his nap. The Communist Party, modeled upon the Jewish structure which forms and runs it, has its front men who are known, and the inner kernel which remains underground or unknown so as to be safe from attack and obliteration.

Communism, Talmudism, Paganism

The identical principles of aristocratic Communism Talmudism and "intellectual" Paganism is demonstrated by the following:

Wives and children in common, in the slave state of Plato and Marx, is the same.

The "common meals" of Plato's Republic are carried out in the Socialist cooperatives and "Israel" kibbutzes.

Compulsory federal education, as in Soviet Russia, current "federal aid to" (control of) "education", are Platonic pagan principles.

Women acting as soldiers in war, advocated by Plato, carried out by the USSR, and in Israel where they are drafted for the army.

The establishment of a naturalistic State religion with the death penalty for those who will not subscribe to it, is the teaching of Plato carried out by Talmudic Communism and its atheistic, "EnSof" impersonal, naturalistic religion.

The Dictator doctrine of Plato and of Marxism-Stalinism is the same. And the dictator NASI of Talmudism holds, with the inner "guards", the same position. In Plato's Politicus is a passage, Pythagorean in essence: "As God stands to the world, the King stands to the State, and as the State stands to the world, the King stands to the world. . .the State. . .has imitated the ordering and harmony of the world".

Plato's acceptance of slavery, his ranking of slaves as different species, and his idea of legal justice concerning murder of slaves, of freemen, ranking differently, coincide with the rank given by the Talmud to "the people who are like an ass—slaves who are considered the property of the master", and all the laws on "Gentiles" which teach that killing, cheating, defrauding and lying to the "slaves" is as permissible as to trick an animal.

The "souls" of the planets being gods, which is astrology, is Plato's theory as it has always been the doctrine of other pagans and of the Talmudic religion.

The mystical use of NUMBERS, as separate powers, as all wisdom, is a basic tenet of Talmudism.

The barracks life (of Russia and Palestine), all property being in common, all wives being in common, the children being immediately taken to state creches for raising (as in Russia and Palestine, theoretically at least), are Platonic doctrines. The Talmudist however, does not share HIS wife. He can get and discharge as many as he likes and can share the Gentile's wife, but his women are private property (he thinks).

Babylonian Nudism

The Babylonian custom which forced every woman to participate in "sacred" prostitution in honor of the procreative goddess, Mylitta, at least once in her life; the nude orgies in honor of the same, against which the Prophets roared, are mirrored in the teaching of Plato that young people should be together nude before marriage (a trimming he illogically added to his wives-in-common state). To quote:

"Marriage in the LAWS" (of Plato) "...is controlled from beginning to end, by the State. Every month each tribe is to have a religious assembly, for acquaintance sake and to promote good fellowship; and these assemblies are to serve the purpose of introducing men to their future wives (771D)." Also (772) he favors the old nudism:

"He provides, too, that men and women should see one another stripped, before they are married... Friendship and social intercourse are one of the bonds of the State". Also we see the current Talmudic passion for "AWARDS": ". . .citizens should know one another personally, in order that honor may be given to those to whom honor is due, and the office to the deserving (738 E).

and thought is devoted to the discussion of social intercourse, and the consideration of the place which dance and song and especially WINE, should occupy in such intercourse" ("Greek Political Theory—Plato and His Predecessors", Sir Ernest Barker, 1918-51,

Barnes and Noble, N. Y., p. 328)

"Celibacy Is Really a Form of Impiety"

In Plato's herd, the perfect herd State, he teaches: CELIBACY IS REALLY a FORM of IMPIETY (721D), which is exactly the teaching of the Talmud. If a man has no children he must sell his Torah to get a woman of child-bearing age, but even if he has children, any number, he must not cease copulating, even if he has to "contract a less expensive marriage with an old or sterile woman" (Yebamoth 61b, not reproduced, p. 411 of Soncino edition).

Private Property

Just as a herd owns no property and has no rights, so the best way to reduce humans to the herd state is to strip them of private property rights—as Marxism does, and as the Talmud does in teaching that Gentile property is "public property—like unclaimed land in the desert".

This is in contrast to the foretold Kingdom of God on earth when: "They shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid" (Micah 4:4).

"The Republic and Its Theory of Communism", a chapter in the above treatise, states: "Plato's scheme not only embraces community of property; it also contemplates community of wives...The most thorough—going modern Socialists equally recognize that Socialism, which means a revolution in property, must also involve a reformation of the family" (p. 217).

RED FLAG, Exhs. 282

The color RED, the flag of Socialist and Communist Internationals, is linked in the Bible to Babylon and to the Pharisees whose religion was born and fostered there for 1,626 years. Christ called them the children of the killers of the Prophets (Matt.23:31-5). He depicts their power as a "Great Whore", "drunken with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus" (Revelation 17), persecuting Christians relentlessly. And in her, then, is found, when this Babylonian World Power falls, "the blood of the prophets" (Rev. 18:24). Not only does all "Jewish" literature connect present-day "Judaism" with Babylon and with the Pharisees, the term Babylon is used to designate the present, seventh, rising Anti-God world government, in Isaiah 14, and 47; Jeremiah 51, and Rev. 17 and 18, etc.

met King Matthias of Hungary in the fifteenth century showed two pentacles with two golden stars...", says the Jewish Ency. "Magen". See Exh. 282.

The complete devotion to BABYLON of the Pharisee religion may be seen by reading the Jewish Ency. On "Babylon"—See Exh. 295-296. The supreme place given the BABYLONIAN Talmud and the word BABYLONIAN used on the title page of every volume of it, are other indications of the Babylonian character of "Judaism" so-called. The "FOREWORD" to the Soncino English translation of the Babylonian Talmud by the late Chief Rabbi of Great Britain, J. H. Hertz, is another indication. See Exh. 34, etc. Also the tribute paid to Babylon in the History of the Talmud in connection with the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud by "Rodkinson" (M. Levi Frumkin, Boston, 1903). See Exh. 34, etc.

The Red Flag Today

Marxism, the political vehicle for Talmudism, cooked up by the Rabbinical descendant, Karl Marx, has always and everywhere used the RED FLAG, which is the official banner of the Socialist and Moscow internationals (the second and third world federations of socialist parties). It stands everywhere for persecution of Christians and is the banner of parties and countries run without exception by Talmudists, now as from the beginning. The Egyptian (1), Assyrian (2), Babylonian, ending 536 BC (3); Medo-Persian (4), Greek (5), Roman (6) ending finally in 1453 when the Turks took the eastern "leg", Constantinople, as the Huns took the western in 453 AD (6); these are the six world governments which preceded the foretold Babylonian World Abomination finally headed by a supreme Dictator Anti-Christ, a RED affair, (7), now rising.

Over more than half the earth the RED FLAG of the Talmudic Anti-Christ waves.

The REPROBATE MIND, Exh. 155

St. Paul, who had been a Pharisee, in his discourses haranguing Pharisees, often bores Christians who do not know what he was arguing about. But one familiar with the Tradition of the Pharisees, or paganism, which is the Talmud, can appreciate his diatribe against the "uncleanness" of those "Who changed the truth of God into a lie" and: "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools", until "God gave them over to a REPROBATE MIND...Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness..." etc., etc. (Romans 1:22, 25, 28).

top of the bed curtain proving that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! "When a pedlar leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar (breech-cloth)... If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed. . .she must, said Rabbi, go—Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place—Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, therefore, be suspected".

From a Roof

The book of YEBAMOTH concerns the duty to marry a brother's widow who is childless. Two volumes of junk and obscenity for its own sake carry this title. An illustration of the "reprobate mind" is the teaching that if a man falls from a roof "and his fall resulted in accidental insertion", as "When in a state of erection the levir fell from a raised bench upon his sister-in-law who happened to be below"—and here the great Talmudic "saint" RASHI is cited as authority. "His commentary on the Talmud is a consummate masterpiece, a remarkable and gigantic work", says the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1943, in the volume dedicated to the Communist-supporting Justice Louis D. Brandeis. "Illustrious jurist...and lover of Zion". Rashi was born in Troyes, France, 1040, and croaked there in 1105.

REMEDIES of GITTIN

For foul, senseless, filthy remedies, illustrative of "the wisdom of the "Sages", see the GITTIN remedies, Exhibits 205-9. Their defence by a modern Jewish doctor is the last word in something or other. See Section on, herein.

SABBATH, Talmud Book, Exhs. 4, 6, 122

If any Talmud book illustrates Christ's depiction of Pharisaism better than the book of SABBATH, one cannot think which one it might be. He said: "Ye blind guides, which strain at a GNAT and swallow a CAMEL" (Matt. 23:24). One way to go raving crazy is to study the book of Sabbath with its rules on what is or what is not permissable on the sabbath. An act of injury, no matter how laborious, is always permissible. On that basis, if a man's aim is to injure his bride, he is permitted to have his first intercourse on

the sabbath, as may be seen in the Exhibits

Exhibits 121-8, inclusive, are running discourses on the proposition of the first intercourse being labor on the Sabbath (Kethuboth 5b-10b, pages 18-25 in the Soncino edition). Not reproduced are the endless hashings on absolutely senseless trifles. Even the boiled down laws, or Mishna of the Talmud, in the Schulhan Aruch, on the Sabbath, take up 82 pages in volume 2 (from page 63-145). The sum and subtance of all of them is a game of subversion. A rule is set up. How many ways are there to get around it and nullify it? That is the problem. Why bother with crossword puzzles when you can play "gnats and camels" with the "sages"?

The Door Key

Now, the rule is that you cannot move goods from one category of property to another; from private to public property or from what is neither public or private, on the sabbath. Your door step is neither public nor private. The street or sidewalk outside the doorstep is public; your house inside is private. THERE-FORE, you must have the goy not only insert your key in the lock, but push the door in as, otherwise, if you pushed the door in with the key in it, you would be moving the key from property neither public nor private (the sill) to the inside of the house (private property). There is so much of the same "gnatting", it is to sigh with boredom. The above gem is not reproduced, so you must content yourself with absorbing the "culture", the "scholarship", of the louse-hunt on the sabbath, Exh. 6.

The Louse-Hunt

Never forget, dear "scholars", that: "One who searches his garments and finds a louse shall not crack it, but simply rub it with his fingers and throw it away on the Sabbath". By "cracky", the whole gnat of the argument is in the cracking. The throwing away is not labor. Cracking is the thing to be avoided.

SANHEDRIN, Talmud Book, Title Page, Exh. 42

Since this book is avowedly "the chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud", together with the book of beatings (Makkoth), or floggings relished so much, it is interesting to see that it violates every one of the Ten Commandments thoroughly.

SEFER

Sefer Raziel, Exhs. 72-3, 283

"SEFER" means book.

"SEFER RAZIEL", meaning book of secrets, is "an ancient Cabalistic book". The rule about calling pagan practices "Jewish" in Talmudic practice. is to attribute them to some old patriarch like Abraham who has been dead for centuries and is unable to deny the charge. This one is pinned on Noah, Abraham, Shem and so on. Altho it is hinted and denied that the book came from Eliezer ben Judah of Worms (a suitable spot for Talmud-ing), the voodoo in it is as old as the pagan "philosophers" sometimes spelled "Foolosophers", Pythagoras, Plato, etc., lovers of the slave state.

"The book contains mystic lore on the LETTERS of the ALPHABET...and various magic receipts and amulets" (Univ. Jewish Ency.", Sefer Raziel"). "From the Talmud...we learn that the ALPHABET played an important role in the creation of the world...SE-FER RAZIEL states that Adam engraved the letters out of the likeness of the fallen angels" (demons) "from aleph to Tav. Every angel must appear as soon as his name is uttered...BEZALEL the builder of the Tabernacle in the wilderness, knew how to combine the letters by which heaven and earth were created (Berechoth 55a" (Univ. Jewish Ency. "Alphabet").

Altho the Bible refers to Bezalel only as a workman inspired to serve God in his efforts on the tabernacle, the Talmud makes him a demon evoker, a smarty of whom Moses was jealous. Bible references to Bezalel: Exodus 31:2; 35:30; 36:1-2; 37:1; 38:22; I Chron. 2:20; II Chron. 1:5. See Exh. 288 on LETTER creation.

"The most important letters of the alphabet are, of course, those which spelt out the TETRAGRAM-MATON, or Name of God, "Y H V" (or W) "H." This word is not to be pronounced as written, but must be read as 'ADONAI', 'The Lord'; and each letter has an especial potency... The belief in the power of the word was common to all the religions of antiquity. Thus the PLATONISTS had notions of the influence of ANAGRAMS made out of the names of persons... In the Talmud... there are many passages to indicate the rabbis were familiar with the various methods of permutation of the LETTERS of the alphabet... The first was that of codes "(Note: the ATBASH code of using the last letter for the first, etc., is described)"... the second.. was the anagram, in which the letters of a word were reshuffled to form a new word. The third was GEMATRIA, based on the numerical value of the letters. The fourth was NOTARIKON, which took each letter of a given word as the initial of an-

other word, and thus interpreted it in mystic fashion". And the Cabalists' special alphabet is diagrammed (Univ. Jewish Ency. "Alphabet").

Sefer Yetzirah, Exhs, 72-3, 288, 78

The MERCABAH rites inspired by dope, incantations, etc., at the end of which the Sun God (Mithra), called in Talmudism "METATRON", boss of this world, is seen, is then referred to.

Luciferian Spirit, Exh. 285, Isaiah 14

"business enterprises", the rousing of "demons", etc., can be accomplished with success ("Amulet," Exh. 285). Slaying and dead bodies are potent!

For the Pharisee job on the Bible, in eliminating the Chief Engineer, the God of Intelligence, planning, approachability, see "Pharisees," Jewish Ency. Exh. 264. Any human characteristic such as Intelligence or Love is "obnoxious verbiage" when attributed to God, and was eliminated, explained away, the shell kept for their "shell game" of cheating the gullible Christian. Attributing Intelligence to God is an "anthropomorphism", a big word for a pagan idea, the idea that humans alone are intelligent.

The Fate of the Anti-Christ Babylon

"Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall . . . consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners? . . . Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities. For I will rise up against them, saith the Lord of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant and son, and nephew, saith the Lord. . . ." (Isa. 14: 12-21). No wonder Babylonian Talmudists call this fictitious!

That this did not apply to the transfer of the ancient Babylonian kingdom of Nebuchadnezzar to Cyrus, the Medo-Persian, in 536 BC, is shown by the fact that Cyrus did not destroy a stone of the great capitol of Babylon whose gorgeous palace he made his winter residence. Also, the same prophecies were made not only by Jeremiah and Daniel, but by Christ in His Revelation (96 AD) where the fall of the FUTURE world government of BABY-LON, linked to the Pharisees, climaxes in the 17th and 18th chapters. It is identified as the 7th world government, counting from Egypt, (1) Assyria, (2) Babylonia, (3) Medo-Persia, (4) Greek, (5) Roman, (6)—then Babylon the Great, guilty of the blood of the Prophets and of Jesus. For the Pharisee "synagogue of Satan" will have a world head as foretold by "Daniel the prophet" (Matt. 24:15; Mark 13:14; Dan. 7:25; 8:23-5; 9:27; 11:31-39, 45; II Thes. 2:1-9).

The "Master of Creation"

Creators of Man, Exh. 72, 79, etc

Shulhan Aruch

Never worry about the spelling of a Talmudic word. As the to keep to their program of confusion, as soon as you have identified ONE spelling, you find another. The above happens to be the spelling in the Universal Jewish Ency., althouthe name on the book itself is spelled: "SCHULCHAN ARUCH" ("Code of Jewish Law," translated by Hyman E. Goldin; Hebrew Publishing Co., 77-9 Delancey St., N. Y., copyright 1927).

It is "the prepared table," "the authoritative code of Orthodox Judaism". It was arranged by Joseph Caro (1488-1575). He died in Safed, Palestine, seat of Jewish voodoo mysticism. He was one of those ousted from Spain in 1492 when Spain tired of being "the golden age" for Talmudists.

Since Caro was accused of neglecting some of the customs of Eastern Polish-Russian-German Jews in favor of Spanish or Sephardic customs (in preference to Ashkenazim Jewish tripe), additions were made to this boiled down compilation of the laws of the TALMUD by Moses Isserles (called "Mappah" or tablecloth for the prepared "table"). It was first printed in Venice in 1565, and, to quote: "it became practically canonical." The Universal Jewish Ency., complains that ever since 1700, due to the exposures of Eisenmenger, the Shulhan Aruch caused anti-Semites to accuse the Jews of being "hostile to humanity . . . permitting all forms of fraud, misconduct and treachery against non-Jews. These false accusations have repeatedly been exposed by Jews and non-Jews" (Univ. Jewish Ency.).

This lie is allowed to stand in this 1943 Universal Jewish Ency. without the fact being added that paid non-Jews are always ready to lie for thirty pieces of silver, and that "false accusations" about the

TALMUD were and are not FALSE. No follower of the "synagogue of Satan" is too small or too great to mimic his Lord, the Father of Lies.

Talmudic Handwashing in Shulhan Aruch

There are three obscene senseless chapters on how to behave in a privy, much about excreta, and all the demon handwashing from morning to night against which Christ declaimed. Just the chapters on "The gnat and camel" rules of the sabbath would wear out a piece of stone: "One should not wash his hands upon the ground . . . because an evil spirit rests upon this water" (Chap. XLIV, Vol. 1 on handwashing at the end of a meal). The right hand and then the left has to be gedunked before a meal: "and he should not dry them with his shirt because it is harmful to the memory" (Chap. XL).

"Wisdom of the Sages" for today: "when a man is asleep the holy soul departs from his body, and the unclean spirit comes down upon him. When he rises from his sleep the evil spirit departs from his entire body excepting from his fingers. From there the unclean spirit does not depart unless he spills water on them three times alternately. One is not permitted to walk four cubits without having his hands washed" (Chapter II). A cubit is about 18 inches—so watch your step! This so-called "handwashing" is not for cleanliness but a ritual in connection with dislodging the demons the "Orthodox" or "pious" Jew spends the rest of the time invoking or inviting in.

The "Mezuzah" on the doorpost is another boundary line for demons not wanted.

SOTAH, Talmud Book, Title page Exh. 16'

Sotah supposedly refers to the woman suspected by her husband of infidelity. The same "high" moral tone revealed in the harlot and the dog thesis, in Exh. 168 (Sotah 26b), prevails thruout. Lewd relations without complete intercourse are ridiculed as merely an obscene act: "and did the All-merciful prohibit a wife to her husband for an obscene act?" (Exh. 169). This same work expounds the teaching that: "WHOEVER TEACHES HIS DAUGHTER TORAH TEACHES HER OBSCENITY", and continues: "A Woman Prefers One Kab" (scanty livelihood) "and Sexual Indulgence to NineKab and Continence" (Sotah 20a, p. 102, Soncino edition, not reproduced).

SODOMY

Sodomy, despite the thunderings of the Bible, is permitted with dead bodies, little boys, baby girls, neighbors', wives, one's own wife—and in general. The argument for this last is in Nedarim 20b (p. 58 of Soncino translation): "our Sages said: . . . a man may do whatever he pleases with his wife at intercourse: Meat which comes from the abbatoir" (stockyards) "may be eaten salted, roasted, cooked or seethed: so with fish from the fishmonger. . . . A

woman came before Rab and complained" (of her husband's sodomy with her). . . . "Rabi replied: Wherein does it differ from a fish?"

References: Sodomy with boys under nine; baby girls under 3, Sanh. 54b-55a, Ex. 54. "Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew"; sodomy with a neighbor's wife: Sanh. 58b, Exh. 59. Permitted with a "terefah" or with a dead person, Sanh. 78a. Exh. 89. Intercourse with the dead permitted. Exh. 163.

All of this is made doctrine with the full Luciferian knowledge of the Bible's laws against it. "Thou shalt not lie with mankind," you may note, is cited in Exh. 54 and the verse given, Leviticus 18:22: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is ABOM-INATION". Yet Christians call Talmudists "People of the Book"!

STARS, Talmudic, Exhs. 282-5-6

The six-pointed Star, called "Davids Shield", or "Mogen David", has been used for magical amulets for centuries, all pagan purposes, then "hung" on to David. Only in the last century did this star commonly come to be used as a symbol of Talmudism. Read the Jewish Ency. Exhibit 282 (in two sections) for its history. The five-pointed Star, also used for pagan sorcery, was "hung" on Solomon. Together, on the RED FLAG, you may note, "both David's shield and Solomon's seal", were used to make a red flag, "with which the Jews met King Matthias of Hungary in the fifeteenth century". The Bible has an uncanny way of prophecying what Satanists will do, as a Doctor predicts the run of a disease in advance. The BABYLONIAN power of the future Red Government of the world is represented as RED. (Revelation 12:3; 17:3-4)

STARS, In Talmudic Idolatry

heavens, containing twelve constellations or signs which the sun traverses annually". And a "CONSTELLATION" is "a group or cluster of fixed stars designated by some name" (Webster). The findings of the ancient astronomer Hipparchus (160-125 BC) concerning the position of the constellations, in the cases of "those which bore the same name coincided approximately with the signs according to Talmudic tradition". In the case of the "choice of symbolic signs. . All may be traced to Assyrian mythology and influence. The Jews during the Babylonian exile adopted. . . Assyrian names of the months and constellations." To continue this Jewish Encyclopedia account ("Zodiac"):

"Since each of the planets was supposed to rule a certain hour of the day, while every constellation governed a certain month of the year, the fate of an infant was predicted according to the heavenly bodies that presided over the hour and the month

of its birth. The conjunction of the planets and constellations was accordingly manipulated to determine the fortunes of the person whose horoscope was thus drawn. A 'good' planet might synchronize with a bad' constellation to some extent. Both planets and constellations indicated certain characteristics in the person born at that time, and care had likewise to be taken to marry only such a mate as had been born under a harmonizing planet and constellation, since otherwise the marriage would be a failure".

The Ruling Gods of Planets

The SUN Enters the section called:
ARIES about March 21; TAURUS, about April 21;
GEMINI, about May 22; CANCER, about June 22;
LEO, about July 23; VIRGO, about August 24;
LIBRA, about Sept. 24; SCORPIO, about Oct. 24;
SAGITARIUS, about Nov. 23; CAPRICORNUS,
about Dec. 22; AQUARIUS about Jan 20; PISCES,
about Feb. 19.

Talmudic Months, Babylonian

The lunar Babylonian calendar having been adopted from the time of the deportation to Babylon of the Judah kingdom (586 BC), the Judaites, then Pharisaic Talmudists to this day, adopted the Babylonian calendar and pagan names of the months, with rites to match. These month names coincide roughly with the above signs of the Zodiac as follows: NISAN (Babylonian month) corresponds with Aries; IYYAR with Taurus; SIWAN with Gemini; TAMMUZ with Cancer; AB with Leo; ELUL with Virgo; TISHRI with Libra; HESHWAN with Scorpio; KISLEV with Sagitarius; TEBET with Capricornius; SHEBAT with Aquarius; ADAR with Pisces.

Star Worshin

"STAR WORSHIP... is perhaps the oldest form of idolatry practised by the ancients. The observation of the stars in the East very early led the people to regard the planets and the fixed stars as gods. The religion of the ancient Egyptians is known to have consisted preeminently of sun-worship. Moses sternly warned the Israelites against worshipping the sun, moon, stars, and all the host of heaven (Deuteronomy 4:19;17:3)...The Israelites fell into this kind of idolatry and as early as the time of Amos they had the images of Siccuth and Chiun, 'the stars of their god' (Amos 5:26); the latter name is generally supposed to denote the planet Saturn. That the kingdom of Israel fell earlier than that of Judah is stated (II Kings 17:16) to have been due, among other causes, to its worshipping the host of heaven. But the kingdom of Judah in its later period seems to have outdone the Northern Kingdom" (Israel) "in star-worship. Of Manasseh it is related that he built altars to all the

host of heaven in the two courts of the house of YHWH, and it seems it was the practise of even kings before him to appoint priests who offered sacrifices to the sun, the moon, the planets, and all the host of heaven. Altars for star-worship were built on the roofs of the houses, and horses and chariots were dedicated to the worship of the sun (II Kings 21: 5; 23:4-5, 11-12). Star-worship continued in Judah until the 18th year of Josiah's reign (621 BC) when the king took measures to abolish all kinds of idolatry. But altho star-worship was then abolished as a public cult, it was practised privately by individuals who worshipped the heavenly bodies, and poured out libations to them on the roofs of their houses (Zephaniah 1:5; Jeremiah 8:2; 19:13). . . Jeremiah, who prophesied in the sixth year of the captivity of Jehoiachin (591 BC) describes the worship of the sun as practised in the court of the Temple (Eze. 8:16) and from Jeremiah 44:17 and following, it may be seen that even after the destruction of the Temple the women insisted on continuing to worship the queen of heaven. . .

"The ancient Hebrews, being nomads, like the Arabs favored the moon, while the Babylonians, who were an agricultural nation, preferred the sun. But, as appears from Ezekiel 20:7-8 the moon-worship of the Israelites, even while they were still in Egypt, was combined with sun-worship" (Jewish Ency. "Star Worship").

Star-Worship in the Calendar

"During the Exile the Babylonian system was adopted, the names of the months being derived from the common Babylonian calendar...Thus TAM-MUZ is the month dedicated to the worship of the fertility spirit of that name" (Note: the male sex-god). "Elul is the month when he was bewailed" (Here, 'alal' is given as the Hebrew for "wail"). But this does not explain why the current Code of Jewish Law (Shulhan Aruch) suggests lamenters, wailers for the current Fast of Tammuz which is in each yearly synagogue calendar!; "Tebeth is the month he sank into the netherworld, and so forth...The following list gives the names of the Jewish months...

"Tishri (Sept.-Oct.)...The New Moon of Tishri is not blessed, as are those of other months...The zodiacal sign of Tishri is the Scales...

"Marheshwan or Heshvan (Oct.-Nov.)...New Moon is reckoned as two days. . .The zodiacal sign is Scorpion...

"Kislev (Nov.-Dec.)...New Moon is irregular, being either one or two days...The zodiacal sign is the Archer...

"Tebeth (Dec.-Jan.)...It is customary to refrain from slaughtering geese during Tebeth...The zodiacal sign is Capricorn. .

"Shebat (Jan.-Feb.) Thirty days. New Moon is reckoned as one day. 15: 'NEW YEAR FOR TREES'. It is believed that demons are abroad in this month. The zodiacal sign is the Waterman (Aquarius)...

"Adar (Feb.-Mar.)...The Zodiacal sign is Pisces (The Fishes)

"Second Adar. Occurs only in leap year...Nisan (March-April)...The entire month is regarded as a prolonged festival, and in one in which it is blessed to die. Every twenty-five years the SUN is ESPECIALLY BLESSED in Nisan. The zodiacal sign is the Ram. . .

"Iyar (April-May)...The zodiacal sign is the Bull...
"Sivan (May-June). ..The zodiacal sign is the Twins...

"TAMMUZ...New Moon is two days. 17: FAST OF TAMMUZ." Note: here two fictitious reasons for celebrating this fast are cited, followed by this admission:

"Ab (July-August)... 9: Fast of Ab" (with a fictitious reason) "... The zodiacal sign is the Lion...

"Elul (Aug-Sept.). . . The Zodiacal sign is the Virgin. . ." (Universal Jewish Ency., "Months").

ASTROLOGY Star-Worship

"Astrology. . . the belief that the sun, planets and star-groups (constellations) possess an influence over human destiny and the attempt to discover and to predict the nature of such influence. There are two main schools of interpretation: one based on the day of the year on which the individual was born, and classifying him by one of the twelve signs of the Zodiac; the other, deriving its conclusions from the exact time of day at which the birth took place and making use of the horoscope, or the study of the position of the sun and the planets in various heavenly 'houses'.

"Babylonia and Egypt...were the centers of astrology in the ancient Orient. Hebrews shared such beliefs..." (the prophets) "Believing as they did in an all-powerful God Who ruled the world on a basis of just reward and punishment, they had no room for a sidereal fatalism which made human lives helplessly subject to the influence of the heavenly bodies. Hence their repeated insistence that God was supreme over the sun, moon and stars, and their scorn for those who attempted to predict human fate by such means". Note: Isaiah 44:24-5; Jeremiah 10:2; Isaiah 47:13 are quoted, the latter quotation being attributed to a fancied "Deutero-Isaiah"—for all Scriptures with Messianic prophecies which Christ fulfilled and are hard to explain away are attributed to some late-comer, a "second Isaiah" of secondary worth, if any.

Continuing the above: "The Talmudic Rabbis, however, found no difficulty in reconciling the belief in astrology with the principles of Judaism". This is followed by a half-column of fine print citing the Talmudic Rabbinical pillars' support of astrology, such as: "Joshua ben Levi held that a man's character was determined by the day of the week on which he was born...Rabba ben Joseph made the statement that a man's fate, including the number of years he would live, the children he would have, and his fortune, was determined not by his piety, but by his horoscope.... Rabbi Hanina..held the determining influence was the star under which one was born...Those born under Venus will be rich..." And so on, and on, and on.

SURVIVAL OF THE OLD STAR-WORSHIP

The whitewashing adjective in the above sentence about the current greeting of "Mazel Tob" being the "SOLE" survival is just a whitewash for the alien eye. One or two New Moon Days are kept monthly. And, under "New Moon, Blessing of the", the Jewish Encyclopedia carries a full-page picture of a street full of Jews in 1748 out paying their respects to the MOON. The text of the above article cites the custom of raising the "body on the tips of the toes three times, addressing the Moon with the ancient formula: 'As I dance toward thee, but cannot touch thee, so shall none of my evil-inclined enemies be able to touch me'. Then those assembled greet one another with 'Shalom alekem' ('Peace be to you'). . .and say: 'Good luck to us and to all Israel'".

"Father of Lies"

In looking into the mess of paganism and criminality which is whited over under the name of, the stolen name of, "Judaism", be prepared to first read one subterfuge, one red herring, after another before the truth shines thru the cloud. Under "Superstition, Jewish", the Universal Jewish Ency. (1943) cites Rabbi Joshua Trachtenberg, and his book, "Jewish Magic and Superstition" as authoritative. His sketch also appears in the latest 1955 "Who's Who in World Jewry", with this work. Typically, Trachtenberg first says concerning New Moon Day rites in the synagogue that 'the pagan veneration of the New Moon" is not directly connected with the Talmudic ceremony observed today; then he goes on to admit: "But certain superstitious practices have been associated with the rite, pointing to its

continued occult importance in human affairs...(such as) addressing the Moon three times: 'As I skip before you and do not reach you, so, if others jump before me may they not strike me', and then thrice bidding one's neighbor 'Peace be unto you'. The ceremony as well as the threefold repetitions, are typical of magical acts...and the belief that one who has performed the full rite need not fear death during the ensuing month' (p. 256). Invoking the Sun along with the Moon is cited on page 201.

SUN, BLESSING OF THE

This ceremony of Blessing the Sun, says the Jewish Ency. (1905) occurs "on the first Wednesday of Nisan every twenty-eight years... This is calculated by the calendar of Samuel Yarbina'ah, which allots to the solar year 365¼ days, and asserts that each of the SEVEN PLANETS rules over one hour of the day in the following sequence: Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, the Sun, Venus, Mercury, and the Moon... the blessing is concluded with 'ALENU' and 'Kaddish Yatom'. The Blessing of the SUN was celebrated by the Jews in New York City in 1897 in Tompkins Square. The completion of the cycle will occur during the 20th century on April 1, 1925; March 18, 1953; and April 8, 1981. Compare NEW MOON, BLESSING OF THE". The following heading in 1952:

"Once in 28 Years"

"SUN AT POINT OF CREATION THIS YEAR TALMUD TELLS"

This appeared in the California Jewish Voice over an article by Rabbi Samuel Rubin. A long-winded hairsplitting article uses the old number and letter juggling to make an appearance of "scholarship." Leap years of 13 months were inserted every 19 years to make the lunar and solar years come out even, and these fell every 19 years. Since only every 28 years does the Sun business fall on Wednesday in Nisan, the Rabbis add 19 and 28 making 47. Now rest your brain—you will not need it: "Our Rabbis told us that this total of 47 (19 plus 28) comes from the following passage: 'And G-d saw that the light was good—'Ki Tov'. For these Hebrew words in turn, amount to 47. Moreover, the Sun has three names, Shemesh, Chamah, Charas. If we take the last letter of these three names and sum them, we get 365—the number of the days within the Sun year!...We say the following prayer: 'The luminaries are good which our G-d has created; he' (note: small "h") "formed them with knowledge, understanding, and discernment" (Note: some soulful attributes for hunks of matter!)"; "he gave them power and might to rule in the midst of the world..." (Jewish Voice, 10/24/52).

Actually, they dumbly follow the laws of gravity

one mass of matter pulling on the other in mathematical proportion without any more "knowledge" or "understanding" than the dirt in your garden.

I remember one exultant report of a SUN BLES-SING service conducted from a USA Government airplane when the great day came!

The vociferous chanting and typical ecstatic carrying on of the Chasidists, whose Baal Shems are experts at whistling up the spirits by voodoo combinations of the Tetragrammaton (or name of Jehova in skeleton, Y-H-W-H in 12, 42, 72 letter combinations known to the "elect). This was described by the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner 5/1/53.

All of the above tribute to the Moon (every month) and the Sun, is specifically forbidden by the Bible. Veneration of the SUN, MOON and STARS was the oldest idolatry.

That the ancients were condemned for the same things wrapped up in Judaism today, and practiced by these "lovely people" as well, is seen in the Bible: Deu. 4:19; IIKings 17:16; 21:3, 5; II Chron. 33:3, 5; PUNISHMENTS: Deu. 17:2-5; IIChron 28:23; Isa. Job 31:26-8; Jer. 7:17-20; 8:2; Ezek. 8:15-6; Zeph. 1:4-5; Acts 7:42. For WARNINGS AGAINST AND PUNISHMENTS: Deu. 17: 2-5; II Chron. 28:23; Isa. 2:6; Jer. 8:12, 19; 19:13 (On star-worship and drink offerings, see "Habdalah"); Eze. 8:14-16; Micah 5:12 (on soothsayers, or astrologists, and witchcraft)—plus the BIBLE from beginning to end—Zephaniah on the host of heaven, and so on. But your morning paper, if you live in Chicago, will give the soothsayers' daily horoscope. Jewish Encyclopedias will tell you that Astrology, or star-worship, was so well entrenched in Talmudism that only Maimonides of their "sages" ever opposed it.

"Other gods" is veritably the middle name of this religion based upon a non-anthropomorphic "god" and a pantheistic world of spirits, These are invoked and doused in water from the time of awakening to sleep at night. Guests are people we invite. If they are not invited they do not have to be thrown out when annoying. The same of the dark spirits in Talmudism.

SUPERSTITION

The primary definition of "superstition" in Webster's New World Dictionary (1953) is "excessive fear of the gods". There is no denial of the existence of a spirit world in the Bible. The ancients would not have bothered to consult oracles, as the Congressmen consult fortune-tellers in Washington, unless they gained, for their enslavement, some current information, along with misinformation (and often ruin). The Jew Dunninger is giving demonstrations of this on the TV. Every Jewish Theological institution has chairs of "Jewish Mysticism". See "Major Trends in

Jewish Mysticism" by Gershom Sholem of the Hebrew Univ., Palestine. The book is made up of lectures Sholem gave at Red Rabbi S. S. Wise's Jewish Institute of Religion, N. Y., now combined with Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati, O. (see Exh. 4), founded by Rabbi Isaac M. Wise who introduced Reform Judaism in this country and edited the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud—extolled as the rule of life for Jewry. Sholem's book was published by Schocken Books, N. Y., 1941, 1946.

There is no conflict between so-called "rationalism" (getting rid of God as Chief Engineer and substituting Man as the Big-Shot), and its political and Talmudic arm, Communism, and the use of spirits for power over individuals and groups of individuals. Look at some of the ZOMBIE faces in the One World movement and ask yourself whether Biblical descriptions of the fall of the Babylonian World Government accompanied by the unclean spirits utilized in gaining that power, are so far afield. Since that described SEVENTH world government is rising now with the god of lust and incest, ZEUS, as its sole religious symbol in the United Nations' buildings in New York, one should pause to consider more critically the former popular Pharisee taunt. They would have had you believe "Red-baiting and witch-hunting" was mere silliness. The supposition was, of course, that there actually were no Reds any more than there had ever been any "witches", or evokers of dark spirits. Now that the Jewish line has changed to pointing at RUSSIA and the COMMUNIST PARTY as the world menace, so that "anti-Communist" societies are sprouting like mushrooms to do the new pointing, of course THAT slogan is falling into disuse, popularly. But, unless the history of every country in every century and the whole Bible are cock-eyed, there ARE "witches".

Jewish Magic

"The sources indicate that Jews were at least acquainted with methods of inducing disease and death, of arousing and killing passion, of forcing people to do their bidding, of employing demons for divinatory and other purposes" (p. 13). And: "Jewish magic... functioned within the framework of the Jewish religion" (p. 15) whereas the Christian church, like the Bible, was thundering against it, as of the Devil.

Expert Trachtenberg Says:

"Knowledge of the names, through which Jewish

magic worked, was inaccessible to women, for it required not only a thorough training in Hebrew and Aramaic, which most of them lacked, but also a deep immersion in mystical lore from which they were barred. . Early mystical and magical lore was successfully guarded by a limited oral transmission. The secret lore of the Kalonymides" (Note: who brought it from Babylonia) "...was first written down in the 13th century. . . Jewish life had turned more and more inward. . . and intensive study of the TALMUD had become almost its sole intellectual pursuit. . . But the German KABBALAH never attained the theoretical depth of its Spanish counterpart, nor did it exert so much influence" (pp. 16-17).

"So we may say that every Jew whose desire led him thither essayed a little magic in a small way. But it was generally recognized that only a minor portion of the mystical lore had found its way into books; much of it remained private, jealously guarded property" (p. 18).

Under the title of "Forbidden and Permitted", Trachtenberg says: "The Bible had pronounced an unqualified condemnation of SORCERY. The TAL-MUD...pursued its customary function of clarifying "(?)" and classifying Jewish law, and so broke up the all-inclusive category of SORCERY into several divisions..." And he cites the various hairsplittings, ending with the admission that the Talmud permits the proscribed or forbidden acts denounced by the Bible.

Note Exhibits 70-74

Christ Charged, Exh. 76

But, with that characteristic of charging as a crime against others what Talmudists themselves are DO-ING, the same Sanhedrin passage denounces Christ as a sorcerer. It was to refute this Talmudic teaching of hate against CHRIST, that Martin Luther wrote his "Shemhamphoras" on the charge that Christ did His miracles by sorcery, using the Tetragrammaton, which, in some passages, He is said to have stolen and hidden in His flesh!

MAN the Big-Shot, Exh. 78

Then, with that old pagan deification of man idea in which nature as a whole is god and MAN is the DOER, Sanhedrin 67b, Exhibit 78, boasts about the Rabbis being able to create calves by "studying the laws of creation, by means of which they created a third-grown calf and ate it". The Sefer Yezirah does the trick if Talmud fails!

And how they do do wonders in Exh. 79. Hot dog! The "sages" are gods indeed.

SOME PRACTICES

The CHAD GADYAH, or HAD Gadyah, is a Passover song which ends: "the Most Holy—blessed be He—destroyed the angel of death that slew the slaughterer that killed the ox that drank the water that quenched the fire, that burned the stick that beat the dog that bit the cat that ate the kid which my father bought for two zuzim". Chad Gadyah is "The Only Kid", namely the Talmudic gang. The Jewish Ency. is more veiled about its meaning than is the book by Rabbi Morris S. Lazaron (Bloch Pub. Co., "The Jewish Book Concern", 1928) called: "ASK the RABBI—2,000 Questions and Answers About the Jew". "What is the sequence in the song, "The Only Kid" supposed to symbolize?" (Question on p. 23, answered on p. 141) "Answers: The rise and fall of great nations, each of whom destroys another until only Israel is left".

And this exactly matches Daniel's prophetic description of the seventh world government, the fourth after Nebuchadnezzar's (Medo-Persian, Greek, Roman, Red): "the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces" (Dan 7:23).

Isaiah and Hahdalah

Few Christians realize that the very practices of Paganism for which the Prophet Isaiah denounced the Judaites about 69S BC, are in use today in the "synagogue of Satan". In that 65th chapter, Isaiah promised the Messiah, Christ, as "a seed out of Jacob" (Israel, as the Lord called him) "and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains" (always the series of mountains on which Jerusalem is located) "...But ye are they...that prepare a table for that troop" (of demons) "and that furnish the DRINK OFFERING unto that number. Therefore...ye shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord God shall slay thee, and call his servants by another name" (Isa. 65:9. 11. 15). Lingering in cemeteries to invoke the dead and eating swine's flesh which was sacred to the sex-goddess Astarte, are further abominations named earlier in the same chapter. And His servants have not been called "Jews" or "Israelites" since the "Inheritor", Christ, came nearly 700 years later. Says

Rabbi Trachtenberg: "On Saturday evening, during the HABDALAH ceremony which marks the beginning of the new week, another libation was offered to the spirits, as part of the ritual. Some of the wine was poured upon the ground 'as a good omen for the entire week to symbolize good fortune and blessing'". Rabbi Trachtenberg then proceeds to debunk the pretense that this had any religious significance, then states:

"Moses Mat in the 16th century wrote that this practice is intended to 'give their portion to the company of Korah', namely, to the powers of evil. And that portion was not inconsiderable. As one rabbi in Silesia remarked, 'If I had the wine that is poured upon the ground in Austria during HABDALAH it would suffice to quench my thirst for a whole year!' This custom of pouring out some wine over which a blessing has been recited, which appears again in the wedding ceremony, may have been considered by some people not as an offering to the spirits, but as a means of driving them off" (p. 167. "Jewish Magic and Superstition").

Just preceding this, Rabbi Trachtenberg covers various food offerings to demons such as leaving a loaf of bread and cup of wine "left standing overnight", which, to quote, is categorized "as 'setting a table for the demons'. Yet it continued to be done sometimes with the frank admission that 'it extends fullness of blessing over the entire week'. During the Passover Seder a cup of wine is filled expressly for the Prophet Elijah, who is believed to visit every Jewish home on that occasion, and the door is opened for him to enter—this time the offering is to a good spirit, rather than an evil one. But during the same service there is a late custom, which arose in German-Jewish circles, to pour out a drop of wine at the mention of each of the ten plagues, possibly to placate the evil spirits, who may be impelled by the reference to so many disasters to visit some of them upon the celebrants. Israel Isserlein's biographer wrote of him, 'He always spilled some of the water from his cup before drinking', thus observing a UNIVERSAL JEWISH CUSTOM going back to Talmudic times. The explanation then given was that the water might have been contaminated by a demon—but obviously merely spilling some of it doesn't purify it all. The intention was to induce the demon to neutralize the possible ill effect of the water by making him a LIBA-TION" (same, pp. 166-7).

TASHLIK and KAPPARAH

Rabbi Trachtenberg cites the power of the KAP-PARAH rites in Judaism. In the first editions of the SHULHAN ARUCH, the accepted code of Judaism compiled by Joseph Caro, his reference to Tashlik be-

ing a "silly custom" was deleted "under the influence of the 16th century Polish annotator, Moses Isserles... The various features of the ceremony accentuate its superstitious and even magical character. Fowl are closely associated with the spirits in Jewish and non-Jewish lore, and are the commonest oblation to them... The cock is employed to represent a man, the hen, a woman, in many magic rites. The circles which are described about the head of the individual, and the numbers three and seven, are well-known magical elements. The words which effectuate the substitution have all the earmarks of a typical incantation. In the earlier texts the words 'this is my atonement' are not present; they were added so that the initials of the Hebrew terms might form the word HATACH, 'which is the name of the angel appointed over this'." Note:

Turn to Exhibit 264

If you will turn to the Jewish Encyclopedia Exhibit from their article on "Pharisees" you will see that when the God of Intelligence, the "anthropomorphic" God was eliminated from the Bible by the Pharisees, "these used...the ANGELOLOGY and DEMONOLOGY of the Pharisees...with the help of the Ma'aseh Bereshit and Ma'aseh Mercabah" (voodoo rites to see the Sur God, Mithra or Metatron, and learn the past and future) "not only to amplify the Biblical account, but to remove from the Bible anthropomorphisms and similarly obnoxious verbiage concerning the Deity by referring them to angelic and intermediary powers (for instance Genesis 1:20)..." In other words, the old mass of spirit or substance of which the universe is composed, god of the Pagans, called pantheism, or god as the sum-of-nature, left spirits or "gods" of every phase of nature to be invoked by the Big-Shots, MAN Above is just one of the "angels" or gods invoked thru the KAPPARAH rites. To continue with Rabbi Trachtenberg's data on this:

"The belief that evil spirits roost on roofs occurs often (the Talmud places them under the eaves)... In view of this requirement that the entrails be thrown on a roof acquires special significance. Thus analyzed there can be little doubt of the true meaning of the rite, which is still observed today. It is probably the most blatantly superstitious practice to have entered Jewish religious usage, for where the significance of other such practices has long since been lost sight of, the purpose of this is too apparent to escape the dullest wits" (pp. 164-5).

New Year fell on a Sabbath on the ground that carrying bread was a violation of the Sabbath rules."

Tashlik Excuses

The various excuse explanations (as usual used as the whited sepulchre for the stark PAGANISM of Pharisaism) are covered by Trachtenberg, and then: "These explanations only too patently evade the main issue, the bread offering to the spirits . . . Under Kabbalistic influence an attempt was made to limit the rite to shaking one's clothes at the river-side . . ." (p. 166). And, as stated elsewhere, herein, a picture appears in the Jewish Ency. showing Jews with bags of bread at the river-side performing the Tashlik ceremony of appeasing the demons of the water. And on this same basis, that demons live in water, the whole book of YADAYIM is based in the Talmud. Yadayim means "hands" and getting the demons off into water from the hands is the Talmudist's job, not cleanliness. That is why Christ would have none of the Pharisee hand-washing voodoo in His life, because of which the Pharisces upraided Him mercilessly.

TO FIG

One of the most characteristic and least charming of the Talmudic customs is the gesture "to fig". This is cited as one of the "most widely used anti-demonic devices . . . It is made by closing the fist and inserting the thumb between the two fingers. Its particularly obnoxious character . . . derives from the fact that it is meant as an obscene representation of the sexual act. Menasseh ben Israel was correct both in his explanation of the intent of this gesture, and his association of it with the Talmudic recommendation that to protect oneself against the EVIL EYE one should place his right thumb in his left fist and his left thumb in his right fist . . . 'When a man encloses his thumb in his fist he simulates a pregnant woman, and they, the spirits, do not harm him'. People who employed this gesture were warned that it infuriates the demons at the same time that it renders them harmless; therefore a weak person, 'especially one who is dangerously ill', should forbear to use it, for the spirits may subsequently take vengeance on him.

"Variations on this theme were also employed: For safety on a journey one should place the little finger of the right hand in the left fist and recite a charm formula. The fingers were used as PHALLIC symbols to the same end, and we learn that a witch is transfixed when one raises his index finger and thumb and recites the name 'Uriel' seven times, or that an 'evil impulse' may be vanquished by pressing the thumbs on the ground, repeating 'Pipi' nine times and spitting" (p. 162).

In all cases, the documentation of Rabbi Trachtenberg is monumental.

Demons of the Privy

In the Kitzur or abbreviated edition of the Shulhan Aruch, which boils down the Talmud laws or Mishnaim, to expedite knowing which shoe to put on in the morning to keep the demons in line, etc., etc., it requires three chapters to tell the modern Jew how to behave in that beloved subject—the privy. Says Rabbi Trachtenberg: "In Talmudic times it was customary to rattle nuts in a jar to scare away the demons that frequent privies . . ." and he cites other devices. The TALMUD never leaves this subject for long. Discussing it is like whiffing the choicest perfume, apparently.

In the endless discussions of it in the Talmud book of Berekoth, is this about a great Talmudic pillar in Babylonia: "Before Raba became head of the Academy, the daughter of Rabbi Hisda used to rattle a nut in a brass dish—to frighten away the evil spirits. After he became head, she made a window for him—in the wall of the house, through which she could put her hand—and put her hand on his head—as a protection. After becoming head of the Academy, he was more exposed to danger from evil spirits" (folio 62a, p. 389 of Soncino translation, not reproduced in the PLOT). Whether to wipe with the right or left hand occupies the preceding passage, and why Rabbi Kahana hid under "Rab's" bed: "He heard him chatting with his wife and joking and doing what he required. He said to him: One would think that Abba's mouth had never sipped the dish before! He said to him: Kahana, are you here? Go out, because it is rude. He replied: It is a matter of Torah, and I require to learn" (61b-62a). That IS the idea of "TORAH" to the Babylonian Talmudist, or Pharisee, sex and filth-worship.

LILITH-Favorite Demoness

Of the hordes of demons the Jew who would win out must use and dismiss, none is more prominent than LILITH. Some of the amulets meant to keep her in check reproduced from the Jewish Encyclopedia, appear in Exhibits 286-7. Lilith is jealous of lying-in mothers and their new-born babies. Her main job is spawning demons it would seem. Rabbi Trachtenberg repeats the Talmudic tale that "when Adam was parted from Eve, he had relations with female demons who bore him demonic offspring." He was at this for 130 years, we are told. Says Trachtenberg:

"As a result of the legend of Adam's relations with LILIT" (Note: just another spelling, as is usual with Talmudic words) ". . . the LILITS were most frequently singled out as the demons who embrace sleeping men and cause them to have nocturnal emissions which are the seed of a hybrid progeny . . . As

the demon whose special prey is lying-in women, it was found necessary to adopt an extensive series of protective measures against her . . . We seem to have here a union of the night demon with the spirit that presides over pregnancy, influenced no doubt by the character of the BABYLONIAN LAMASSU, and the lamiae and striga of Greek and Roman folklore" (p. 37).

CEMETERIES in TALMUDISM

"Obviously the spirits can help as well as harm the living . . . An observant visitor to the tomb of Simon bar Yohai, for instance, at Meron, Palestine, will discern a host of written entreaties for the saint's aid" (Note: the "saint" was a second century Talmudic voodoo-worker associated with the Zohar, principal multi-volumed work of the Cabala, more sexy, if possible, than even the Talmud). And, "the ancient practice of visiting the cemetery to entreat the offices of deceased relatives or scholars persisted . . . In addition to such individual visits, there grew up the custom of the entire congregation repairing to the cemetery annually on several occasions, such as the seven 'rain fasts', and on TISHA 'B'AB . . . and on the eves of New Year and the Day of Atonement, 'that the dead may beseech mercy on our behalf" (p. 64).

The Jewish Ency. ("Cemetery") refers to the custom of visiting the cemetery to consult the spirits, and cites Niddah 17a, There "spending a night in a graveyard in order that a spirit of uncleanness may rest upon him—to enable him to foretell the future" is mentioned with the warning that "in consequence he might sometimes be exposed to danger" (p. 113, Soncino edition, Niddah). Reference to this practice is also made in Sanhedrin 65b, see Exh. 72. That cemeteries are infested with spirits, demons, etc., is the general idea: "The custom of washing the hands after a funeral is very widespread. . . . Efforts were made to find a Biblical precedent for this act, but . . . there was a general admission that it was done 'to dispel the spirits of uncleanness' which cling to one's person, these being 'the demons that follow them home'" (p. 179, Rabbi Trachtenberg, "Jewish Magic and Superstition").

Forbidden Demonism is Talmudism

Says Trachtenberg: "The future is an open book to the denizens of the supernatural realm, and like the demons and the angels, the deceased can by eavesdropping pick up the latest decisions of the court on high; 'they flit thru the universe to hear what has been decreed.' Then they report back to intimates on earth, in dreams or personal appearances. . . . But in general the spirit-world is chary of its secrets and can be induced to reveal them only by magical means . . . mystical invocations and occult rites are effective in forcing the dead to obey the magician's will. The art of NECROMANCY is a specialized function of sorcery" (same, p. 65). Again: "the official language of the celestial court is Hebrew. . . . This principle was advanced in the Talmud" (p. 74).

In "The War With the Spirits", Trachtenberg classifies: "The methods of warding off the spirits fell into three general categories: 1. to drive them away . . . 2. to buy them off with gifts, to bribe them and thus conciliate them; 3. to deceive them by disguising their intended victims, or by pretending that the situation was other than what it was. Each of these methods, and often two or three of them combined, was known and employed by Jews and even found expression in special ceremonies which HAVE BECOME PART and parcel of JEWISH RITUAL". In addition to putting the severed foreskin in a bowl of water, the attendants dipping their fingers in this bloody fluid, Trachtenberg mentions burying the circumcizer with the foreskins he has severed, as demonic ritual. The unluckiness of even numbers except on special nights when FOUR cups of wine, instead of an odd number may be imbibed, the protective, and divine nature of Talmud study for blunting demons, and the recitation of the SHEMA at night are covered by this expert: "There was no attempt to disguise the purpose of this prayer-service; it was frankly admitted time and again that 'it exists only because of the demons'". He quotes: "'at my right Michael, at my left Gabriel, before me Uriel, behind me Raphael.' This is nothing more than the Jewish version of the ancient BABYLONIAN incantation, 'Shamash before me, behind me Sin, Nergal at my right, Ninib at my left', or 'May the good Shedu go at my right, the good LAMASSU at my left,' etc." (p. 156).

"The final weapon in the anti-demonic strategy is that of DECEIT". Apart from wailers at weddings to deceive the demons into thinking it a sad instead of glad occasion, breaking a glass at a wedding and the SHOFAR being blown to scare the demons, this strategy of deceit, says the Rabbi, is "most commonly employed in changing an invalid's name so that the spirits who might be charged with effecting his death would be unable to locate him . . . just as criminals adopt aliases to evade the police" (p. 168).

SYNAGOGUE NAME—CHANGING

If you will turn to "SHINNUY-HA-SHEM" in the

Jewish Encyclopedia, you may read the synagogue formula for changing the name of an invalid so as to fool those nincompoop low-brow demons. Such saps! Owing to the Pythagorean belief in the potency of letters and numbers on their own account, changing a name can fool the silly things! Was Christ so wrong to call the Pharisees "Fools and blind!" (Matt. 23:17) with all their asinine books of the Talmud on vowings, etc., along with running a synagogue of Satan (Rev. 2:9; 3:9)? Did He KNOW His subject? Read the synagogue formula for fooling the sickness demons:

"When the Righteous Judgment has already decreed death from illness, our saintly rabbis said: Three things annul the decree; and one of them is changing the name of the patient. We therefore, in conformity with their advice, have changed the name of (mention here the former name) to the name of (mention the adopted name) who is now another person" (Note: THAT ought to fool'em, telling that!) "The decree shall not have any force with regards to him . . ."

MONOTHEISM

Double-talk is the trade mark of the synagogue of Satan. Whenever Talmudists sanctimoniously declare that as devotees of "pure MONOTHEISM," or the "UNITY of God", this precludes their belief in His Personality being Incarnate in Jesus Christ, His SON, we Christians keep silent. The Unity of God to which they refer is the oneness of the pantheistic EN SOF, the mass without a Chief Engineer. That is the UNITY of nature in which the Pagans believed. But for every form of spirit invocation, and for the deification of MAN, that is Talmudism, a religion of POLYTHEISM, or many gods. Slyly, they say what they mean. We do not understand them

Go into any of the MODERN HERESIES, the "NEW" religions our tired Christians like to think were just hatched. You will find them all in Talmudism and its collection of ancient Old Testament paganism. THEOSOPHY—with its Socialist Annie Besants, its spiritualistic Mme. Blavatskys. Look it up under METEMPSYCHOSIS or Transmigration of Souls. Hinduism with its glamorous Swamis who hook the Christian ladies' funds, never letting them glimpse the degradation of womanhood, the degenerate Kali sacrifices (as to Molech), the baby tortures of child-marriage.

The way Mohammed started out fighting Jews, and ended by adopting their harem ideas, and the influence of Talmudists on the Koran, is another study. The CABALA with its non-existence of evil; its deification of MAN, is a source book for modern "ISMS", unknown to the modern devotees.

THE STATE DEPARTMENT EXHIBITS, 243-260 The Stage at the Time

The Actors in the Piece:

Ira Nelson Morris was Ambassador to Sweden. He and Henry Morgenthau. Sr., a'so rewarded, together with the late Red Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, a group of leading Jows, had picked, groomed, ran and elected Woodrow Wilson first as governor of New Jersey. They had placed Grover Cleveland on the board of trustees of Princeton University and caused the obscure professor Wilson to be made president of the institution, thus giving the now popular lustre of "Scholarship" to their candidate, as contrasted with the popular "backroom politician" type. This accomplished, in 1902 (Cleveland became trustee in 1901), Wilson starts his piece about "Humanity", building up the role of the "great humanitarian". The first Hague Conference on Carnegie money had been held in 1899, and one step after another was to follow in preparation for a Jewish World State in the name of "peace".

The Second Hague Peace Conference was held in 1907, and Carnegie endowed the Central American Court of Justice and the Pan-American Union founded by Wm. Howard Taft and Elihu Root, at the same time that the cornerstone was laid at the Carnegie Peace Palace at the Hague. Taft, Root and a chorus were advocating a World Court and Wilson was elected Democratic Governor of New Jersey—all in 1910.

Wilson, preceding Ike, had been made College president as prelude to his political career for Jewry. The "Great Humanitarian", Wilson, made Governor of New Jersey, was elected president in 1912. His "alter ego", Edward Mandell House, intimate and liaison man of Jewry, had already written in novel form the political creed calling for measures now largely adopted, leading to a dictatorship, entitled: "Philip Dru, Administrator". House in his "Intimate Papers of Col House" (Seymour; Houghton Mifflin Co., 1926), admits this and also his sponsorship, with the Kuhn Loeb Warburg crowd, of the Federal Reserve Act, pushed by Carter Glass into being (pp. 153, 166). "Philip Dru" was first published anonymously.

Like the Spanish-American War slogan, "Remem ber the Maine", the First and Second World War slo

gans were phony. Fresh from the Red Revolutions of Europe, 4,000 Jews served in the Spanish-American War. The blowing up of the Maine, now known to have been an inside job, altho Spain offered any amount of compensation, "provided the final occasion for the outbreak of war". Adolph Marix, its Jewish commander, who had 15 Jewish crew members on it, was made "secretary to the court of inquiry on the explosion", whose report precipitated the war, and: "The war resulted in the liberation of Cuba and the Philippine Islands from Spanish rule" (which was allergic to Jewry which had enslaved Spain) "and thereby made it possible for the Jews to settle in these islands" ("A Century of Jewish Life", Elbogen, Jewish Pub. Soc. of Am., 1944, pp. 341-2; Univ. Jewish Ency., "Soldier," p. 625, etc.).

Like "Remember the Maine!" (which sent so many to horrible and lingering death) and "Remember Pearl Harbor!", as now established as another planned phony, the Lusitania and other incidents "to make the world safe for democracy" were equally planned connived incidents.

Bleeding the Nations

Edward Mandell House had been erranding back and forth to see the Kaiser, Lord Arthur J. Balfour, British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Lord Grey and the French powers. They had expressed sympathy, but inability to make their old countries join a Jewnited States League of Nations world organization, until bled white. The Jewnited States was too new to be given world leadership like that. And so "watchful waiting" became the USA policy. The German Junkers were not for disarming in the face of a Russian-Jewish revolutionary pack ready to march on them, the Reichstag being already one-third Socialist. And Germany has always been Jewry's favorite oyster: it being a garden spot of efficient indefatigable "slaves" when under control.

And so, while cousin Teddy Roosevelt, idol of Jewry, was wielding the "Big Stick" on one side of the street, and Barney Baruch with other Jews was financing the Plattsburg training camp for officers, Wilson was playing the idealist "too proud to fight" role, and public opinion was kept about evenly divided so that the USA could have entered the European war on EITHER side. Wilson was to play the role of world mediator among exhausted nations. Jewry was piled into the Washington administration in Baruch's and other departments, as at Versailles for the Peace Treaty where the assemblage was called a "KOSHER" affair. The USA profits were phenomenal, all in the name of "humanity"—then unknown to little citizens like me. I resented the European awareness of this "Shylock" role when I first visited Europe

121

after World War I. Time was gained by arguing over submarine warfare, as we supplied the armed allied vessels and the Germans had to shoot unannounced or be sunk forthwith. And the hand was always being held out to Germany for us to cease supplying her enemies if she would come in under a League of Nations with teeth. House was running back and forth to see Count VonBernstorff, German ambassa dor here.

Henry Ford had bitten on that humanitarian "PEACE" propaganda and on the Ford Peace Ship, which he financed, he awakened to the Jewish scheme of it all revealed by his Jewish revolutionary guests like Rosika Schwimmer. The "Dearborn Independent" articles were his reaction—until his family was beaten down and now serves Jewry.

Wilson's Speeches

You could read the speeches of Woodrow Wilson, without his name, today, and think you were reading those of FDR, for the same inspiration, "the Father of Lies," wrote them. With a foot safely in both camps, Wilson campaigned and was re-elected in 1916 because he had armed the nation, and because he had "kept us out of WAR!"

Wilson saw the abdication of the Czar's government, March 15, 1917, and hailed it. The pretence then, on the part of stooges like Alexander Kerensky and other Jews, was that a "democratic" revolution had been successful, and that "humanity" was to profit from it; the weak czar, under the thumb of his Jewish bankers and occult Rasputin, having been a pushover achieved by Jewish finance for Jewish power objectives. As the above scholar, Jennings Wise, has written:

"Woodrow Wilson, despite the efforts of the British police, made it possible for LEON TROTSKY to enter Russia with an American passport" (p. 647).

TROTSKY (Bronstein) was then living in New York editing the Russian Communist paper, "NOVY MIR" (new world), financed by the communist Garland Fund, directed by Jacob Schiff's rabbinical protege, Rabbi Judah Magnes, and such leading Communists as Wm. Z. Foster, Robt. W. Dunn, etc., with

Sidney Hillman, Norman Thomas, etc., serving every front on the Red Revolutionary battlefield in this country, penetrating the churches, schools, every phase of American life, with Garland money.

The opinion of HOUSE of FDR is shown: "in 1932 when a press photograph showed Franklin D. Roosevelt, just returned from his nomination in Chicago conferring with HOUSE at the latter's Beverly home the author of PHILIP DRU, ADMINISTRATOR proclaimed the Presidential nominee a more suitable leader for a new American Revolution than even WOODROW WILSON had been" (p. 639, of the above book).

NOW for the STATE DEPARTMENT EXHIBITS

Francis Gropes in the Dark

Wilson, finding Germany adamant, had had to have the USA enter the war to knock the stuffing out of Germany and bring her into the Jewnited States League of Nations—as was done. Our Ambassador in Russia during the Red Revolution, David R. Francis, as you may note, was at first in the dark and friendly to the Kerensky crowd, and discovers only later on that Kerensky all the time was in on the follow-up of the Bolsheviks being financed by the Kuhn-Loeb crowd, aided by their powerful Hamburg M. M. Warburg relatives. He expresses surprise, as you will see, at the discovery.

Even the Weimar Republic, its constitution written by a Jew, Rathenau, and the Karl Liebknecht-Rosa Luxemburg Jewish-Bolshevik revolutions in Germany, failed to do the "CHAD GADYAH" smash on Germany required for the World State. Hitler armed Germany to trek thru Russia, attracting the anti-Semites as a trail of honey brings ants out of their holes, only to bottle them up, not permit the Vlassows to help overturn the Jewish USSR government, thus was Jew Dictatorship extended over much of the world, with iron-clad occupation of the beaten lands (Japan, Italy and Germany), held until the Jewnited Nations World could be stabilized under heel. All of this appears on the Jewish Gomberg map "completed October 1941" before the USA entered World War II in December, 1941. Ike helped send back the Russian anti-Bolsheviks to be executed, as General Vlassow was, by the Jewish USSR government. Many committed suicide.

Exhibit 244, Morris, Jews

Exhibit 244 shows the end of the communication of Ira Nelson Morris, Jewish meat packer of Chicago, who had helped Red Rabbi S. S. Wise, Barney Baruch and other leading Jews, to pick, groom, and put Wilson in the Presidency. Morris was then made Ambassador to Sweden, thru which arms, paid for by the Jewish cabal, were run thru to the Red Revolutionaries, as will be seen. Morris is here citing the proclamation of the Grand Duke Michael, the Czar's brother whom the Czar in abdicating March 15, 1917, had named as regent until his son came of age. This proclamation was sent in the nature of a report by Morris to Secretary of State Lansing, March 19, 1917.

Next, appears the report of Ambassador Francis in Russia to Lansing suggesting: "Financial aid now from America would be master stroke." And: "Immeasurably important to the JEWS that revolution succeed."

Not reproduced is the communication, the very next day, from Lansing telling Francis to call on Milyukov, Foreign Affairs Minister of the new government, and to "state that the Government of the United States recognizes the new Government of Russia," to which Francis replies that he has arranged to turn out his entire staff "in full uniform" to recognize the revolutionary outfit.

Also omitted are the pages showing the Premiership of Prince Lvov, a sop to the royalty-adoring Russians. All party functions of the Left had unitedly put over the revolution. To quote the New York State Committee Investigating Subversive Activities' four-volume report of 1920 (headed by Sen. Clayton R. Lusk): "alongside of the provisional government headed first by Prince Lvoff, the SOCIALIST and ANARCHIST elements of Petrograd's population established a SOVIET of Soldiers', Workmen's and Sailors' Deputies. . . . Its president was at first Tcheidze" (Menshevik leader) "and its vice-president KERENSKY" (who was leader of the socialist Social Revolutionary Party). "In May, 1917, the SOVIET" (Kerensky's) "forced the resignation of the first cabinet . . . Kerensky who succeeded Prince Lvoff, the first premier of the provisional government, proved to be a weak and vacillating character" (p. 218). Yes, "weak" and so, so "willing."

Exh. 245

The typical tactic of claiming the opposite of what is true, we next see. The (Jewish) "Russian refugees returning from America" are to howl about discrimination on the part of USA Secretary of State Elihu Root. The current Secretary of State Lansing in preparing Ambassador Francis for this coming fracas reveals

Exh. 247—A Little Planned Chaos—Exh. 248

Valiant Jewish Kerensky has to come home from the front when Schiff's humble servant Milyukov's Cadet Party ministers resign. And the next day, July 17, 1917, we see that the Bolshevik turmoil is used as "the ostensible grievance" for Kerensky to demobilize "two regiments at the front." ENTER TROTSKY:

With Kerensky having conveniently "departed for the front," leather-lunged Trotsky is haranguing the crowds. The Cossacks, who are anti-Jew, are unable to prevail.

That Mysterious "German Money"

123

ism;" "Farewell, O Prince;" "F.D.R. Unforgettable Friend of Israel;" "The Architect of a Better World;" "Like Unto Moses;" "He Made the Whitehouse a Lighthouse;" "Lament for Our Dead Leader;" "Roosevelt's Place in Jewish History;" "He Loved Us All;" "Our Pain Is Great;" "Architect of WORLD ORGAN-IZATION," (By Tamar de Sola Pool); "Captain, My Captain." There are 74 titles like that. The COM-MUNIST PARTY put out a record, with wailing accompaniment up and down the scale, dirging and lauding, which I bought in New York. It was sung by the Party chorus at his Memorial there.

Francis Gets a Shock Exhibits 250-255

While the Army is disintegrating and Kerensky is fluttering with small talk, knowing all the time what was to follow, the take-over by the open murderers came in November, 1917. We skip all that to the communication of February 9, 1918, when Ambassador Francis tells Secretary of State Lansing that the Kerensky files reveal a shocking picture. You need one omitted picture.

The day of the "Coup D'Etat," November 7, 1917, Francis communicates with Lansing telling him that the Secretary of the Embassy, Sheldon Whitehouse, met Kerensky hurrying out of Petrograd, and acknowledging that the Bolsheviks held the city and the Ministers of his government would be arrested (p. 224). From then on, the reports go like this: "all Ministers arrested except Kerensky"; "Bolsheviki took possession of Winter Palace where all Ministers except Kerensky were located", "all Ministers except Kerensky in Peter and Paul Fortress." Conflicting reports screen Kerensky's safe exit, not a hair of his head harmed, and he has been spending the intervening years resting comfortably in the luxury of Jew York.

Exhibit 250

It is plain to see that at first Francis sees the "German money" financing the Bolsheviks as just that and nothing more. He senses that a general European revolution is being fomented. And all his dope comes from the files of "Kontrerazvedka, Government secret service organized under KERENSKY." Then, queries Francis:

Exhibit 251

"If so, unavoidable question arises why K." (Kerensky) "did not use evidence against Bolsheviki last July" (And this is sent from February 9-13, 1918). "Many clues lead to Stockholm and Copenhagen."

Francis proceeds to quote the documents showing: That, in the name of the German government, agencies have been set up in such Finnish border towns as Lulea, Haparanda and Vardo, also in Bergen and Amsterdam. That "very close and absolutely secret relations (are) being established with Finnish and American banks. In this connection the Ministry begs to recommend the Swedish Nya Banken in Stockholm; the banking office of Furstenburg; the commercial company Waldemar Hansen in Copenhagen which are maintaining relations with Russia."

Francis adds this: "NOTE: this is outline of basic financial structure begun February, 1914, five months before war was launched and still in operation; notice reappearance in subsequent LENIN messages, towns Lulea and Vardo, likewise reference to American banks. Olof Aschberg, one of the heads of the Nya Banken, came to Petrograd month ago and boasted that N. B. "(Nya Banken)" was the "Bolsheviki bank." The GUARANTEE TRUST CO., of N.Y., is mentioned, and "FURSTENBURG," under the name of Ganetski, and ASCHBERG are cited as inner group members apt to run the Bolshevik state bank.

Continuing Exh. 252

Skipping the incendiary strikes and devices planned already in 1914, we come down to "DOCUMENT 3." You may see by referring to the 1943 Universal Jewish Encyclopedia ("Finance, Jews in") that the so-called "D" banks of Germany were all run by Jews, and here the Disconto Gesellschaft and Deutsch Bank, two of them, are mentioned as part of the conspiracy.

Exhibit 253

Continuing, we see the name of MAX WARBURG (of M. M. Warburg bankers of Hamburg, related to the Kuhn Loeb Warburgs of the USA). Max Warburg came from Germany in 1939 and served on the American Jewish Committee "Peace Committee" which drew up and organized the UNITED NATIONS, its Charter and its propaganda network, consummated at San Francisco in 1945 (See American Jewish Year Book, "Report of American Jewish Committee," on "Institute on Peace and Post-War Problems," p. 751, Vol. 43, 1941-2). Max is especially honored for his UN work on that page.

Note that the banker, Dmitri Rubenstein is cited on this Exh. 253 as one of the three Jewish bankers who maneuvered with the Russian revolutionaries (Zenzinov and Lunacharski), Max Warburg and Parvus being the other two bankers. After bribing his way out shamelessly as a draft dodger in this country, Rubinstein's son (Serge) was murdered in his N.Y. apartment. The 1/31/55 issue of the Chicago Tribune devoted an article to his financial speculations. He had been charged with fraud, served a term here, etc., before his murder in January, 1955.

Rasputin Controls

Schiff Connections

To quote: "When the Kehilla" (of New York; see Exhibits herein)" was organized in 1909, the control rested with a group of German Jews, including JACOB SCHIFF, president of Kuhn Loeb and Co., a branch of the Bleichroeder Mendelssohn Bank, affiliated with the big "D" banks in Germany: Deutsche Bank; Disconto Gesellschaft, Dresdener Bank, Darmstadter Bank." This is from "Waters Flowing Eastward" by L. Fry, published by the R.I.S.S. of Paris, founded by Msgr. Jouin, an authority. Again: "In Germany the leading private bankers included the Mendelssohns . . . and the Bleichroeders . . . who were bankers to Emperor William I, Bismarck, and the early industrialists . . . Frankfort, the mother city of Jewish bankers . . . produced its Lazards, Speyers, Sterns, Dreyfuses, and Sulzbachs, as well as sending abroad one JACOB H. SCHIFF" ("The Jews of Germany," Marvin Lowenthal, Longmans Green and Co., N.Y., 1936).

And, says the same source: "Towards the end of the period the house of WARBURG in Hamburg played an important part not only in the finances but the DESTINIES of Germany. MAX WARBURG was adviser to the government at the Versailles Peace Conference. Carl J. Melchior, another member of the firm . . . headed the financial section of the Armistice Commission in 1918-1919 and was one of the six German delegates to Versailles."

The Jewish Bankers

The great Jewish banking monopolies are interwoven by marriage like a rug. Note three things in the ROTHSCHILD Exhibit 298:

• 1. That of 58 Rothschild marriages to that date (1905, Jewish Ency.) exactly half or 29 had been to first cousins. This appears in the right hand column.
• 2. That the Rothschilds "were almost the first to make use of journalistic methods to arouse the interest of the public in their loans"—and one might add—lack of loans. AND: "They have, however, consistently kept the secret of their own operations!" A CHIEF REASON why Russia collapsed and went under the Red Heel during World War I appears in the third significant statement in Exh. 298:
     • 3. No loans to Christian Czarist Russia:

"Of recent years the Rothschilds have consistently refused to have anything to do with loans to RUSSIA

owing to the anti-JEWISH legislation of that empire' (This was 1905).

Schiff

Turn to the laudatory sketch of JACOB SCHIFF, of the Kehilla of which he was executive committeeman, report of 1917-18, Exh. 214, 215:

Matching number 3 above is this: "In 1873, he" (Schiff) "returned to Europe where he made connections with some of the chief German banking houses" (He headed Kuhn Loeb & Co.) "The firm of Kuhn-Loeb & Co. floated the large JAPANESE WAR loans of 1904-5. thus making possible the JAPANESE VICTORY over RUSSIA. . . ." And the last paragraph (Exh. 215) boasts that "Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the best interests of HIS PEOPLE. He financed the enemies of autocratic RUSSIA" (This was 1918 after the Bolshevik revolution had been made secure) "and used his FINANCIAL INFLUENCE to keep RUSSIA from the money market of the United States"—and all factions of Jewry hailed him for this.

All thru the STATE DEPARTMENT papers under discussion, most of which are not reproduced, is the picture of Russia in a state of economic collapse as soldiers and sailors are being PAID to demonstrate against the Christian government, by Jewry.

The KAISER

"It is a most significant fact that, as in Washington, the most constant and privileged visitors to the White House were Jews, so in Berlin the only private telephone wire to the KAISER was owned by Walter Rathenau" (who wrote the constitution of the Jewcontrolled Weimar "Republic"). "Not even the Crown Prince could reach the Kaiser except thru the ordinary telephone connections. . . .

alt was a family enterprise, this international campaign. JACOB SCHIFF swore to destroy Russia. Paul M. Warburg was his brother-in-law; Felix Warburg was his son-in-law. MAX WARBURG, of Hamburg, banker of the Bolsheviks, was thus brother-in-law to Jacob Schiff's wife and daughter. . . .

"MAX WARBURG represents the family in its native land. Max Warburg had as much to do with the German war government as his family and financial colleagues had to do with the United States war government.

"As has been recounted in the press the world over, the brother from America and the brother from Germany both met at Paris as government representatives in determining the peace. There were so many

The AMERICAN HEBREW carried a cover picture of the statue of Judith in bronze which had been presented by Mrs. Edsel Ford to the Detroit Institute of Arts. It depicted Judith "the moment she appears . . . after she had killed the sleeping Holofernes". At Channukah, which is around our Christmas time, cheese dishes are eaten by the Talmudists in honor of Judith who is supposed to have lured the head of the Syrian army of Antiochus Epiphanes (who was cooperating with the Jewish High Priest Menelaus in making Judea pagan) into a sex scene in which she fed him cheese until he became so thirsty he got drunk on wine and she then cut off his head with his own sword and carried the dripping member about the camp to disorganize the soldiers of this Holofernes, their leader.

Graced by this pretty cover picture of the Judith gift of the Fords, the leading article of this June, 1938 number is: "WILL EILI, EILI, TRIUMPH OVER HORST WESSEL?" The Jewish powers are lauded: filthy-minded Red Leon Blum of France; Maxim Litvinov (Finklestein) of Russia; Hore-Belisha, "Tommy

Atkins' new boss", and their wiles extolled, ending with this prophetic hope:

"And when the smoke of battle clears . . . there may be presented a tableau showing the SWASTIKAed CHRISTUS, being lowered, none too gently, into a hole in the ground as the trio of non-Aryans intone a ramified requiem that sounds suspiciously like a medley of the "MARSEILLAISE." 'God SAVE THE KING', and the 'INTERNATIONALE', blending in grand finale, into a militant, proud and aggressive arrangement of 'EILI. EILI'" (End). The prophecy was fulfilled. The EILI, EILI Talmudic crowd rode herd over Germany, supplied the Reds into power, partly thru UNNRA under the Kehilla's Herbert Lehman. Half the world stands to go to the torture rack, the firing squad or slave labor camp if they breathe the word "Jew" without kneeling to this anti-Christ Babylonian Power. Yes, Christ is being "lowered, NONE TOO GENTLY into a hole in the ground," everywhere behind the Talmudic Iron Curtain. They lowered Him there once before. But He ROSE AGAIN and HE WILL REIGN, despite the "EILI, EILI," "synagogue of Satan", as Christ called the Pharisees, whose religion in written form is the authority of "them which say they are Jews" today, the Babylonian Talmud.

SCHIFF in the SOCIETY COLUMNS

"Today it is estimated by JACOB'S grandson, JOHN SCHIFF, a prominent member of New York society, that the old man sank about 20,000,000 dollars for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia" (Cholly Knickerbocker in his society news column in the Hearst press, Feb. 3, 1949, appearing in the N.Y. Journal-American, etc.). JAMES PAUL WARBURG, in his sketch in "Who's Who in American Jewry—1938-1939" states:

Paul M. Warburg had married Jenny Nina Loeb, mother of James Paul, and Jacob Schiff had married Theresa Loeb, sister of Nina. Felix M. Warburg and Paul M. Warburg of Kuhn Loeb & Co., partners of Jacob Schiff, were brothers of MAX WARBURG of Hamburg, Germany, the pay-off man, in power with the Kaiser, who funneled funds to LENIN and TROT-SKY.

The ROTHSCHILDS

Jacob Schiff received his banking training in his father's business, he being a Rothschild agent and

associate. The basement of the two-in-a-row houses of Schiff and Rothschild, which I visited in Frankfort-on-Main, was one room-in-common, with a joint get-away which formerly led beyond a ghetto wall. The little shack at the back was where the kings, hat-in-hand, would come to get Jewish loans. The original name of Bauer had been abandoned for "Red Shield" (Rothschild) and a Red Shield hung out as an address sign at the front of the house, and a ship sign for "Schiff" hung out the Schiff home, built on the same common wall. Each house was about the size of an entrance hall in width, with the sink and kitchen in the front hall. The other room back of the Rothschild kitchen was a tiny synagogue when I was there in 1934. A skull-capped Jew was the guide who collected the entrance fees for showing the houses, the Rothschild house being the attraction. A gambling table was the main piece of furniture in the front room upstairs of the Rothschild house. Two rooms on each floor comprised the house. Just look up the Lehmans, Lazards, Speyers, Rothschilds, Warburgs, etc. and you will see a Jewish banking "rug" of interweaving intermarriage.

Continuing Exh. 253

As the DOCUMENTS 1 and 2 showed the revolutionary set-up, the banking credits all ready to function in 1914, and Document 3 specifically names MAX WARBURG in this 1914 conspiracy, so Document 4 of February 23, 1915, continues the work of revolution in detail with "W" (Warburg) "chiefly works from Stockholm," where one of the Jewish pickers of Wilson was USA Ambassador, Ira Nelson Morris. He had been there from July, 1914, and remained until 1922. The "Rhenish Industrial Syndicate" advises the Nya Banken in Stockholm and the Stockholm representatives of two of the Jew-run "D" banks of Germany that they are to give money for revolutionary propaganda against Russia.

Exh. 254, Lenin Gets Funds

In Document 6 we see that LENIN got funds in 1917 during the month of JUNE. As the note of our Ambassador states: "Kronstadt, the navy base, was the nerve center from which L's" (Lenin's) "activities radiated during the summer. . . ."

For a picture of the seething bloody result of the Jewish funds paid to LENIN, in this case "315,000 marks" at one swat, a vivid picture is painted in the "History of the Russian Revolution" by Wm. H. Chamberlin (1935) who still serves the socialist press.

Kronstadt

The great mutiny of the Kronstadt sailors of May 17, 1917, is chronicled even in modern encyclopedias as a Red Revolutionary event. Kronstadt is an island

21 miles from Petrograd in the Gulf of Finland. Chamberlin describes the march of 20,000 sailors who disembarked from Kronstadt and marched thru Petrograd shooting in o homes and killing people on the pretext that they had been attacked. The roaring bloody days of July 16th and 17th left the people helpless at the hands of the bloodthirsty demonstrators: "So the city was really at the mercy of the demonstrators," says Chamberlin (p. 173, Vol. I). He says: the Kronstadt sailors marched thru the main streets of Petrograd. . . They promptly broke into houses from which shots were supposed to have come and killed with scant ceremony anyone whom they suspected of shooting . . 'five people were killed and twenty-seven wounded before his eyes on Sadovaya Street'", reads one report, by one Kantorovitch. Things might have been even worse if the admired terrorist TROTSKY, who was to gouge out eyes and dismember his victims in sadistic Talmudic fashion in the Red Terror, had not appeared: "The sailors were completely subdued by Trotsky's eloquence and energy" (p. 174). He ordered his political opponent Chernov freed and told him to "return to the Soviet assembly hall". It was a mock battle between moderate and immoderate Soviets leading up to the ripe time for take-over in November. This was in July, a rehearsal.

More Funds for Lenin, Exh. 254

In September, 1917, Kronstadt is notified that the orders to give passports and 207,000 marks "as per order of your Mr. LENIN have been handed to persons mentioned in your letter". Then, remembering that IRA NELSON MORRIS, the Jewish picker-of-Wilson, with Red Rabbi Wise, etc., was USA Ambassador to Sweden at Stockholm, then, the next is pertinent:

"The selection met with approval of his excellency the ambassador." The communication is dated: "Stockholm, September 8, 1917".

Furstenberg at Stockholm

Stockholm was a cozy place those days for the Reds with the USA Jewish Ambassador friendly to Jewry's aims. There the "banking office of Furstenberg," and the "Swedish Nya Banken in Stockholm" are mentioned in Document I, shown in Exh. 251 and that was in February 14, 1914. Now, Document 8 is written to "Mr. Furstenberg" and is from the representative of the Deutsche, one of the German "D" Banks, in Switzerland. He is writing Furstenberg, June 16, 1917, to tell him that Bolshevik pamphlets costing 32,000 francs (and Swiss francs were the highest of all in exchange value, I know), have been sent and he would like to know when they arrive. "Maximalist" is

used thruout the reports, which means Bolshevik (majority).

WARBURG Opens Account for TROTSKY

Looking at the map of Sweden, you may see that up north where Sweden joins Finland, and the Gulf of Bothnia ends, washing both shores, there is a little border port town of Haparanda and south of it is Lulea, also on the Gulf, with Russia, of today, a short trek to the east across Finland. This was the spot chosen for the arms-running to the Bolsheviks. The Imperial and "D" banks of Germany, in the political saddle, in cahoots with the Jewish Ambassador to Sweden, and the Red Revolutionary Jews, armed with endless funds, put over the job. The Jewish network touched everywhere. The Universal Jewish Ency. boasts of the Jews who led the Bolshevik revolution in Russia:

Jewish Revolutionaries

"The political revolution of March, 1917, brought about the complete emancipation of the Russian Jews" (p. 670, "Soviet Russia").

"Individual revolutionary leaders of Jewish origin—such as TROTSKY, ZINOVIEV, KAMENEV and SVERDLOV—played a conspicuous part in the revolution of November, 1917, which enabled the Bolsheviks to take possession of the state apparatus." The great majority of Jews were Socialists, socialist Bundists, socialist Mensheviks, we are further informed, all of whom had worked for the overthrow of the Christian government of Russia in order to turn it into a milking barn and stockyards of the "people who are like an ass—slaves who are considered the property of the master"—as the Talmud teaches (Kethuboth 111a, etc.)—the "master" being Jewry.

And Consequent "Anti-Semitism"

It followed, in the fight between the Christian elements and the Bolshevik Jews and their dupes, as the same source asserts, that:

"Wherever the civil war was fought, the Whites identified the Jews with the Bolsheviks and singled them out for attack. . . . From the first, Anti-Semitism was severely condemned by the Bolsheviks. . . . The recuperative process which set in with the end of the civil war was furthered by the New Economic Policy (NEP) adopted in the spring of 1921. . . . By 1924 nearly one-third of all the stores in Moscow were owned by Jews" (p. 674, same).

Exhibit 254-

Furtsenberg, in good approved Communist style addresses his letter in Document 9 to Raphael Scholnickar as: "Dear COMRADE." He tells "Dear Comrade" that: "The office of the banking house M. WARBURG has opened . . . an account for the under-

Bolshevik Leader-Exh. 255

Furstenberg from his busy banking office is a busy Jew these days, sending messages of cheer. This one, Document 10, is to the Bolshevik military leader Antonov at Haparanda telling him that: "COMRADE TROTSKY'S request has been carried out," and that a trusty Bolshy, "Sonia," will be coming to hand him "400,000 kroner."

German Socialists

Overlooking nothing, including agitation in Germany for revolution which led later to the bloody Bavarian Soviet, we see the note of Ambassador Francis on Document 11:

Trotsky's paper, "Novy Mir" in New York had been subsidized by the communist Garland Fund (set up by Charles Garland who was jailed for running a free-love farm and turned over his fortune to aid the Red cause), under the direction of Rabbi Judah Magnes, who set up Peoples Councils on Soviet lines during World War I to cause a revolution here with a quick Jewish take-over, if possible. Magnes' long list of Red activities appears in my RED NETWORK. Magnes was the protege of JACOB SCHIFF.

Document 12-Against England and France

Jewish purposes are world-wide. Their "internationalism" is Talmudic "nationalism." This document reveals the transference of 180,000 marks for agitation "against England and France," etc.

Students of the Communist movement are bound to run across the story about how M. Oudendyke, Netherlands Minister in Russia at the time of the Russian Revolution, had warned the British and French governments that COMMUNISM is JEWISH, but that this warning had been carefully deleted from the British papers on the subject.

It will be asserted that such a report never existed. Yet, here it is, printed in the USA State Department Papers in 1931, and here it is reproduced for you. The Oudendyke report is long. I have reproduced not all of it but enough so that the context of his warning is

plain—some four pages—on Exhibits 256-9.

The meat of the horrible situation in Russia, he summarizes, is this:

"The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other Governments to the fact that if an end is not put to BOLSHEVISM in Russia at once the civilization of the whole world will be threatened . . . " (turn to Exh. 259)"...as it is organized and worked by JEWS who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. . . . I am also of the opinion that no support whatever should be given to any other socialistic party in Russia, least of all to the Social Revolutionaries, whose policy it is at the moment to overthrow the Bolsheviks, but whose aims in reality are the same . . . any profession . . . is merely a tactical move in their struggle with the Bolsheviks. . ." And Oudendyke begs that this be transmitted in full to the British Foreign Office in cypher.

Kerensky, Social Revolutionary

The brilliant Oudendyke was not the only one to perceive the game of the Kerensky leader of the Social Revolutionaries. Official and unofficial observers, native Russians, have declared him to have been the chameleon intermediary between one phase and the next phase of Jewish Imperialism over Russia, rewarded by a safe borth in the USA. His typical Talmudic appearance and talk over the TV in 1954 precluded any further effort to hide his identity.

One report after another in this State Department collection, speaks of the German money being received by Lenin and Trotsky—that is that it went thru Germany at that time. The USA Red Cross and Christian Association are cited for their pro-Bolshevik activities: "I suggest advising the Red Cross and Christian Association to instruct their representatives to confine their activities strictly to their line of work," wrote Francis (May 16, 1918, p. 531).

From our Embassy in Russia comes the report of: "conditions appalling; a veritable slaughter. . . . Men are shot without trial" (Sept 21, 1918). And "bloody delirium now reigning at Moscow and Petrograd (Sept. 25, 1918, p. 694).

We Get Ernst Toller

Into Red activity in Germany we have seen the money being poured in Exh. 255. Jewish Ernst Toller, leader of the bloody murdering Bavarian Red Revolution in 1918, was to come to this country where his play "Pastor Hall" was sponsored by James Roosevelt with Mrs. FDR in the filmed prologue. After Toller's suicide, 5/22/39, his heirs were suing the Roosevelts for the proceeds from his play. He was, to quote:

"chairman central committee Bavarian Soviet, 1919; and member of Red Guard; in prison 1919-24" (The American Labor Who's Who, 1925). He left his last article, "Last Testament of Ernst Toller" to the Communist Party's New Masses magazine (6/6/39); B'nai B'rith Hillel Foundation director, A. L. Sacher, recommended Toller's "I Was a German" as one of 50 best books (B'nai B'rith Magazine, 7/37). He went on being very active in support of the Communist church-burners of Spain until his death. Kurt Eisner and he had been fellow leaders of the Bavarian Soviet bloodshed.

Two other Jews attempted to hurry up Jewish imperialism in Germany, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg whose bloody "Sparticist" revolution for two weeks threatened to Sovietize Germany, until they were killed, January 15, 1919.

BelaKun (Cohen) attempted the same thing ir Hungary where for 132 days he and his Jewish cohorts murdered, tortured, introduced sex into the schools, threw bodies in the river nightly, even baked nuns alive in an oven (1919), as described to me by a former official, until their power was momentarily overthrown—until given back in World War II. The New York State Lusk Report (1920), indexing the above as "HUNGARIAN and SOVIET GOVERN MENTS PRINCIPALLY JEWISH," says of BelaKun's Hungarian Soviet: "Of thirty-two principal Commissars, twenty-five were Jews, which was about the same proportion as in Russia."

"Jew Baiting on the Left," an article in the socialist Jewish Frontier, May, 1940, quotes George Sorel ("Reflexions on Violence," chapter on "Plea for Lenin") thus:

"It seems that the JEWS who joined the revolutionary movement are chiefly responsible for the terrorist measures for which the BOLSHEVIKS are being blamed. This hypothesis seems to me all the more plausible as the intervention of the Jews in the Hungarian Soviet Republic was not fortunate."

Turn to KARL MARX, Ferdinand Lassalle, Emma Goldman, Rosika Schwimmer, any of the Jewish revolutionaries, in Jewish encyclopedias and note the loving handling of their sketches!

WRO SAYS SOCIALISM NOT JEWISH

The next time when some Christian dupe tells you: "But these Iron Curtain bosses are not JEWS! Socialism is not JEWISH!", for one thing, pull out the pamphlet put out by the Jewish "Reform" "Union of American Hebrew Congregations" and their "Central Conference of American Rabbis" who have voted to socialize the economy of this country more than once. "Jew and Non-Jew". Show them the New York Times of 9/13/36 in which this "Central Conference of Am. Rab-

"SOCIALISM WAS ORIGINATED BY JEWS; and today Jews play a leading role in its spread and interpretation" (p. 30). (Information About Judaism, Merchants Bldg., Cincinnati, O.)

Exhibit 260

Here, in Exhibit 260, we have a typical report from those on the ground, a communication from our Consul General at Moscow (Summers) to our Secy. of State, May, 2, 1918: "JEWS PREDOMINANT in local Soviet government; anti-Jewish feeling growing among population which tends to regard oncoming Germans as deliverers".

TREES. THE WORSHIP OF

"NEW YEAR FOR TREES" is part of the yearly synagogue calendar. It is sometimes claimed that certain Christian holidays were formerly celebrated by pagans. This may be true. But the objects of the celebrations were entirely opposite. As it is natural to compare a beautiful girl to a flower, it is natural that the resurrection of apparently dead nature and the Resurrection of Christ should be compared. But that is not the same as worshipping the god of procreation and fertility, as the ancient pagans did. There are no two answers from Christians as to why Christmas and Easter are celebrated. Read the varying, equivocating, hedging variety of reasons given by the Jewish authorities as to why their holidays are celebrated. "What goes on here?" is the natural reaction to all this evasiveness, or direct contradictions by top sources.

Under "NEW YEAR for TREES" in the Universal Jewish Ency. (1943) we are told that Shammai set this holiday for the 1st of Shebat (around February) and Hillel, the most popular of these two 1st century Pharisees, set it for the 15th of Shebat—and, of course, Hillel won. The "eating of many species of fruits" is cited for this occasion and: "NO SPECIAL LITURGY... is prescribed for the day".

tioned, and customs in various countries such as Russia described. There "The children are granted absence from school and join in eating the fruits".

That the trees around the Canaanite altars to the procreative powers and gods were not only symbols of fertility but were used as whoring places in their honor, is cited thruout the Old Testament. Each reform king cut down the "groves" which are denounced as a heathen abomination. Deuteronomy 12:2-3; 16:21; II Kings 18:4; 23:6, 15, are typical. Jeremiah, thundering at the Judaites, accuses them thus: "under every green tree thou wanderest, playing the harlot" (Jer. 2:20).

The posts, or "Asherah", marked "the high places" for sex degeneracy, in the name of "fruitfulness". "Asherah" is defined as: "a wooden post or tree-trunk with the branches lopped off...a seemingly indispensable part of the sanctuary in the ancient Canaanitish cult...a symbol of the fruitfulness of nature.." (Univ. Jew. Ency.).

Tree Worship

"Tree Worship", says the same source, is the belief "that trees are inhabited by spirits who exert good or evil influences and must therefore be revered. . . such a belief existed among the ancient Canaanites and . . . was adopted by the invading Israelites along with other elements of their religion and culture". Referring to the "sacred character of these trees": "This corresponds to...the Asherah. . and to what the prophets tell us of the worship 'upon every high hill and under every leafy tree' . . . The Deuteronomic law prohibited the Asherah (Deut. 16:21) and ordered the destruction of those already in existence (Deut. 12:3). But tree-worship was a custom difficult to eradicate and it has survived in many parts of the world down to the present day".

"As has been pointed out", says the Jewish Ency., "the Prophets were unable completely to suppress tree-worship, which has survived in Palestine through all religious changes to the present day" (End). Not only in Palestine, but in the synagogue calendar of "holy" days!

The Talmud on Trees, Cited Above

The Gittin 57b passage referred to as the source of trees in connection with weddings, follows the 57a passage about Christians being in hell under boiling "excrement" and every foul blasphemy of Christ. This is followed by a dainty tale about David: "He went into a privy and a snake came, and he dropped

his gut from fright and died" (p. 262, Soncino edition, not reproduced). Then, 57b:

"It was the custom when a boy was born to plant a cedar tree and when a girl was born to plant a pine tree, and when they married, the tree was cut down and a canopy made of the branches".

"The Golden Bough—A Study in Magic and Religion", a classic on the subject by Sir James George Frazer (with a string of titles for scholarship), devotes much space even in the abridged edition (Macmillan, 1951) to "Tree Worship" which he traces thru different countries as a pagan observance: Germany, Lithuania, etc., etc. He says of Buddhist monks who, believing that trees have souls, "will not break a branch of a tree 'as they will not break the arm of an innocent person'. These monks are Buddhists. But Buddhist animism is not a philosophical theory. It is simply a common savage dogma incorporated in the system of an historical religion. To suppose, with Benfrey and others, that the theories of animism and transmigration current among rude peoples of Asia are derived from Buddhism, is to reverse the facts."

What Frazer writes about the animistic, transmigration doctrines of Buddhism applies with equal force to so-called "Judaism", which is poles apart from Bibleism. The commonest statements of all Jewish authorities attribute this, that, and the other custom and doctrine of "Judaism" to Persian, Babylonian, Assyrian sources. The leading paganisms of all the centuries have been gathered up and treasured within the whited sepulchre of Pharisaic Talmudism. The long stay of Pythagoras in Babylon, his number and letter magic; the transmigration of souls out and back into the EnSof; procreation being the hub and center of the universe, a man's first duty being to get souls out of "guf" and if this is impossible to keep on copulating in honor of the procreative powers; the selflessness of the universe; the multitude of spirits in charge of all functions; Sun-worship; veneration of the Moon; man as a spark of the divine capable of pushing the universe with his own illuminated inflated "knowing" self (Lucifer means "light-bearer")—all this forms the old Nature religions of paganism, seeking power thru abracadabra, invocations, fasting and ecstasies to attract the spirits of the unseen world. It is all as old as the Old Testament and as current.

made in religious thought. Animism is passing into Polytheism. In other words, instead of regarding each tree as a living and conscious being, man now sees in it merely a lifeless, inert mass, tenanted for a longer or shorter time by a supernatural being. . . (who) enjoys a certain right of possession or lordship over the trees, and, ceasing to be a tree-soul, becomes a forest 'god'" (pp. 129, 135).

TAMMUZ

EZEKIEL, who, with Isaiah, Jeremiah and Daniel is one of the four major prophets, and had been deported to Babylon with the faithless king Jehoachir in 597 BC, in a vision of the Jerusalem Temple about 594 BC, was told by the angel: "Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here?". And: "behold, at the door of the temple of the Lord, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men. and they worshipped the sun to the east. . he brought me to the door of the gate of the Lord's house. . and behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz' (Ezek. 9:14-17). Yet both SUN and MOON veneration and celebration of the Fast of TAMMUZ, exactly as at the time of Ezekiel, prevails in "the synagogue of Satan" today. The seventeenth of Tammuz is the date of the Fast.

The authority for the Fast of Tammuz is Talmudic, and it is observed by the Orthodox Jews (Universal Jewish Ency., "Fasting"). It is one of two main fasts of the synagogue year. The other is in connection with the High Holidays when all vows and obligations to be made during the coming year are annulled in advance in the "Kol Nidre". During the three weeks between the Ninth of Ab and the preceding Fast of Tammuz no marriages may be performed. Look in "The Code of Jewish Law" (Shulhan Aruch) for today:

Wailings for Tammuz

Under "Laws Concerning the Interval Between the Seventeenth of TAMMUZ and the Ninth of Ab, Chapter CXXII: . . . one should not cut his hair during these days; paring of the nails is forbidden only during the week in which the ninth of Ab occurs; . . . concerning the goblet of wine for HABDALLAH on the conclusion of the Sabbath, if there be a child who is able to drink the greater part of the goblet it should be given him . . .; it is permissible to have (new garments) made by a non-Jewish workman, but not by an Israelite; . . . it is the custom to call up to Maftir the Rabbi who knows how to LAMENT. . ."

"Laws Concerning the Ninth of Ab . . . all enter the synagogue and take off their boots. . . but one light is

lit in front of the Reader . . . prayers are said in a low voice, with a weeping intonation, mourning like . . . All should be seated on the ground . . . Lamentations and the special lamentations are likewise said in a low tone with weeping intonation . . . special lamentations should be prolonged till close to noon . . . Bathing is forbidden, whether in hot or in cold water, even to put one's finger in water is forbidden . . . one may wash his hands in the morning, but should be careful not to wash more than the fingers, for this is what constitutes the main morning wash as an evil spirit rests on the fingers in the morning. . .

"Cohabitation is forbidden. . . It is proper not to have conjugal intercourse on the night of the tenth day, unless it be the night of the ritual immersion, or if he is about to go on a journey, or has come back from a journey" (End of Chapter CXXIV).

TAMMUZ, God of Procreation

With that awareness characteristic of Talmudism, the Universal Jewish Ency. cites Ezekiel's denunciation of the weepings for Tammuz who "was held to descend to the netherworld every year in the month of June or July and then, after lamentations and various offerings, to be restored to life through the intermediation of his wife or mother, Ishtar" (Astarte) "This is a vegetation myth very similar to that of Adonis in Syria. The share of the women in the rite was due to the fact that the myth was connected with the idea of fertility. . The fourth month of the Babylonian year (July-Aug.) was named after Tammuz, and this has been taken over into the Jewish calendar".

Harvest time in Palestine is in the summer, not the fall. Frazer treats of the Tammuz rites in connection with the cutting of the harvest as symoblical of the wounding of the procreative god (by a wild boar, in one place), and the insuring of the harvests to come by wailing over his demise. To quote him:

"Nowhere, apparently, have these rites been more widely and solemnly celebrated than in the lands which border the Eastern Mediterranean. Under the names of Osiris, TAMMUZ, Adonis, Attis, the peoples of Egypt and Western Asia represented the yearly decay of life, especially of vegetable life . . . The supposed death and resurrection of this oriental deity, a god of many names but of essentially one nature. . . We begin with Tammuz or Adonis.

"The worship of Adonis was practised by the Semitic peoples of Babylonia and Syria, and the Greeks borrowed it from them as early as the 7th century before Christ. The true name of the deity was TAM-MUZ: the appelation of Adonis is merely the Semitic 'Adon', 'Lord', a title of honor by which his worship-

pers addressed him...In the religious literature of BABYLONIA Tammuz appears as the youthful spouse or lover of Ishtar, the great mother goddess, the embodiment of the reproductive energies of nature... every year Tammuz was believed to die, passing away from the cheerful earth to the gloomy subterranean world, and that every year his divine mistress journeyed in quest of him 'to the land from which there is no returning....

"During her absence the passion of love ceased to operate: men and beasts alike forgot to reproduce their kinds: all life was threatened with extinction. So intimately bound up with the goddess were the sexual functions of the whole animal kingdom that without her presence they could not be discharged...His death appears to have been annually mourned, to the shrill music of flutes, by men and women about midsummer in the month named after him, the month of Tammuz. The dirges were seemingly chanted over the effigy of the dead god" ("The Golden Bough", Frazer, p. 878-9).

Female Procreative Goddess

"Istar", or Astarte, writes another authority, was "the principal goddess of Mesopotamia and perhaps the most popular deity in the BABYLONIAN pantheon...(she) so it was related in Nineveh and Babylon. had chosen Tammuz, 'son of light' (Dumuzu in Sumeria), to be the lover of her youth..." He is wounded by a wild boar and she goes to the nether world in search of him. "In the meantime the world of the living is wearing mourning on account of Ishtar's death. In the absence of the goddess the rites of love are no longer performed" ("Man and His Gods", H. W. Smith, p. 84).

The MOURNING, the cessation of intercourse, the show is right here today in honor of the procreative powers to which so much adoration is devoted in the Talmud. Explanations will be profuse, and silly. There is no reason to wail and mourn and keep a Fast of Tammuz today, nor to keep two NEW MOON DAYS.

The MOON and Talmudists

Isaiah, in that terrible first chapter of condemnation of the pagan abominations of the Judaites, inspired by God, writes:

"Your NEW MOONS and your appointed feasts my soul hateth...I am weary to bear them". They are given then, as their followers are now, a choice, and "if ye refuse and rebel" (against the teachings of God) "ye shall be devoured with the sword" (vs. 20).

In the Cabala the Talmudists represent themselves as the Divine Presence, or Shekinah, and when the Female Shekinah is copulating with her male, then "Israel" will be ruling the world. Says the Jewish Ency.: "The reason why the Jews count the days of the year by the MOON is that, like the MOON, which reigns both in the daytime and night, the Jews have both this world and the future one...The MOON on account of its monthly reappearance is considered as the emblem of Israel...Therefore the reappearance of the moon is sanctified...by the recitation of benedictions..." ("Moon").

The ZOHAR, Principal Work of Cabala

The Zohar is a veritable library. Like the Talmud it seeks to nullify all the literal meaning of the Bible. This the Zohar does by allegorizing. Whereas the "Sages" of the Talmud always give as "higher" meanings their own reversal of Biblical moral laws, the Zohar in more fanciful, and in sexy language seeks to reduce to Nature the whole of life and to Deify Man. Based upon the Cabalistic method and doctrines, the principal characteristic of Gnosticism was the "harmonizing" of opposites, or syncretism. By this means black can be represented as white. That Lucifer always arrays himself as an angel of light is a Biblical truth; "Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works" (II Corinthians 11:14). The Cabala was the basis of Gnosticism.

"ZOHAR ('brightness'), the principal work of the CABALA", starts the article in the Universal Jewish Ency. which includes this: "Cabalistic groups raised the ZOHAR to the same rank... as that given to the... Talmud... The reading of the Zohar was regarded as a religious duty by the HASIDIM and by Oriental Jews and some parts of the ZOHAR were used liturgically... The Zohar's teachings combine practically all the elements of the older Cabala: the doctrines of the Primordinal Man (Adam Kadmon), of the Sephiroth, of Creation and of the Mercabah... number and letter mysticism, especially in reference to the names of God..."

ZOHAR, "Cabalistic Theosophy"

The Jewish Encyclopedia (1905) on the ZOHAR, states: "it contains a complete cabalistic theosophy", and calls it: "NOT THE WORK of a SINGLE AUTHOR", under which subtitle the close relationship to Hinduism is cited: "it is necessary to ascertain where and when the Jews became intimately acquainted with the HINDU philosophy, which more than any other exercised an influence on the ZOHAR" (a parallel reading is quoted), and emphasis on the similarity follows. The Mohammedan Sufis had similar doctrines: "All these sects had their sacred writings which they kept secret, and these writings probably formed the

nucleus of the Zohar". One section is described as "explaining Scripture mystically by way of...GEMATRIA...the doctrine of Metempsychosis...the importance of washing the hands...The Zohar repeatedly endeavors to impress upon the mind of the reader that the Biblical narratives and ordinances contain HIGHER truths in addition to the literal meaning".

The Zohar in its later form (after the 13th century) "spread among the Jews with remarkable celerity... representatives of Talmudic Judaism began to regard it as a sacred book and to invoke its authority in the decision of some ritual questions.

"Glorification of MAN"

They were attracted by its glorification of manits doctrine of immortality...the Zohar declared him to be the lord of Creation. Indeed, according to the Zohar. ..man influences the ideal world of the Sephirot. ..altho the Sephirot expect everything from the EnSof, the EN SOF itself is dependent upon man". (The EnSof is the mass called "God", a mindless self-percolating essence, unknowing and unknowable). The Darwinian theory of evolution, like the Spinoza theory of "immanence", pantheism, are the same Cabalistic ideas in new world dress. Karl Marx called it by a still fancier name "dialectical materialism", the mindless bashing of germ to fish to mammal to ape to man, with the Jewish revolution as its crown and triumph.

The Universal Jewish Ency, will tell you how when the Hollanders began to call the thories of Spinoza by their right name—Atheism—his own Cabala teachers who were members of the Beth Din (Talmud law court) quickly excommunicated him to prevent MORE unpopularity from fastening upon the already unpopular Jewish community. But, ever since, he has borne the title of "Blessed Spinoza". All that he did was to voice the Cabala, the foundation of the basically atheistic "Jewish" Babylonian Talmudic religion.

Procreation is "God"

Says the above authority (Jewish Ency.): "Zoharic elements...crept into the liturgy of the 16th and 17th centuries...the characteristic features of which were the representation of the highest thoughts by human emblems and human passions, and the use of EROTIC terminology to illustrate the relations between man and God, RELIGION BEING IDENTICAL WITH LOVE...sensuous pleasures, and especially intoxication, typify the highest degree of divine love as ecstatic contemplation, while the wine-room represents merely the state thru which the human qualities merge or are exalted into those of the Deity". The vast number of spirits, etc. are covered.

Tied up in the ZOHAR and Cabala generally, are the doctrines of metempsychosis or transmigration of souls, the worship of the seven planets, Sun, Moon, and the over-all EnSof, diagrammed as the Ten Sephirot which perk themselves out and back into the mass, the EnSof, which corresponds with the pagan Aristotle's Ten Intelligences (or Boss Spirits of the heavenly bodies).

Transmigration of Souls

Reincarnation, or transmigration of souls, is a doctrine of the Cabala generally. Failing to wash off the demons of the hands may turn one into a river, says the Jewish Ency. under "Transmigration of Souls". The theory is the cause of much degradation in Hinduism. In the Cabala, each soul corresponds to a part of the body of the Adam Kadmon universe, some being "lower" organs, some "higher". The "dibbuk" or possessing spirit who can only be expelled by a "BaalShem" wonderworker came into the Jewish press recently (1955) when the dibbuk is alleged to have been seen leaving the body of its unwilling host. The Jewish press all carried the report.

God "Non-Existent"

"The KABBALAH" as expounded by Ginsburg (George Routledge & Sons, London, 1925) lays down as doctrine 1 of the "Kabbalah": "God is boundless in his nature. He has neither will intention, desire, thought, language, nor action" (Note: therefore, OUT goes the whole Bible and its Will-ing, Thinking, Acting, God of Intelligence). Continuing: "He cannot be grasped and depicted; and for this reason is called EN SOPH, and as such he is in a certain sense not existent" (Note: small letters for the Deity in original). 2. "He is not the direct creator of the universe since he could not will the creation..." Then come the self-perking emanations, the Ten Sephirot, then "the different worlds gradually and successively EVOLVED. These evolutionary worlds are the brightness and the express image of their progenitors, the Sephiroth, which uphold all things". The Sephiroth create the souls, and the souls must return to the source "whence it emanated...The creature shall not then be distinguished from the Creator" (Note: this is the 'Nirvana' of Hinduism, which Webster defines as "the extinction of individual existence by absorption of the soul into the supreme spirit") and, moreover:

"the soul will rule the universe: she shall command, and God obey" (pp. 145-146). In view of the distinction between Brahmins and untouchables in Hindu castes, and the difference in Talmudism between the "asses" who have no human status, alive or dead, and Jewish "humans", it will be easy to see who will do the ruling, and who will do the obeying, God Himself being but a lump, a mass, an essence, a source stream, for MAN to work. That is "monotheism".

Letters and Numbers

The way Pharisaic abstracts are made into Beings, and the Chief Engineer made into a lump is by a jungle of permutations of letters, the ten primary numbers and 22 Hebrew letters ranking as the "thirty-two ways of secret wisdom". Make a thing "secret" and doll it up with obscure verbiage, and the dupe wanders around thinking himself in a hall of profound wisdom beyond his own comprehension: "Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth" (II Timothy 3:7). Forseeing the fall of the climax of this Luciferian spirit in the Anti-Christ ruler over the 7th Babylonian (Talmudic) World Govt., Isaiah calls him the man: "That made the world as a wilderness, that opened not the house of his prisoners...O, Lucifer...how are thou cut down to the ground that didst weaken the national For thou hast said in thine heart,...I will exalt my throne above the stars of God...I will be like the most High...But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch...Prepare slaughter for his children...that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the earth with cities" (Isaiah 14:12-21; Daniel 11:45; Rev. 17:10-11; II Thes. 2:3-4. Compare Jeremiah 51:7-8 with the still-future Rev. of Christ in the 1st century: Rev. 17:3-5, calling the 7th World Govt. director—a Babylonian "whore", also its fall, like a stone: Jer. 51:63-4 and Rev. 18:21).

Metatron, Sun God, and the "Number of His Name"

With God a "lump", and MAN busy getting ready to rule the universe, someone has to be "Boss" around here, and METATRON (Mithra) is the guy. The Talmud sometimes gives the EnSof a comic character with big feet, splashing with the big fish in the sea, and has him teaching dead children Torah one-fourth of the day, but BIG SHOT Metatron teaches them THREE-fourths! This last, in AbodaZara 3b, is cited by the Jewish Ency. ("Metatron"), also his being "lord of all the heavenly hosts, of all treasures, of secrets. The ZOHAR defines his nature exactly by declaring that he is little lower than God" (Note: the "lump"). He is not only indentified with "Zorastrian Mithra", the Sun God here, but in Mercabah articles he is seen by the "rider" inflamed with incantations,

dope, "and other means", as comparable to the "demiurge": "in Plato's philosophy, a secondary deity, the creative spirit who made the world" (Webster). Under "Mercabah" the Jewish Ency. describes the spiritualistic Mithra rites of "Metatron" whose name letters add up to those of Shaddai (God). Non-Jews are unaware that using letters for numbers ("Gematria") is as prevalent today in Pharisaic Judaism as it was in the time of Christ who foretold that the number of the name of the Anti-Christ would be 666. This World Dictator will let no man "buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the NUMBER of his name" (Rev. 13:18). In war time and in Iron Curtain countries, dictatorship by rationing is already practiced, and thus foreshadows the above.

Sholem: "Divine" Talmudists:" "Holy Communion"

they cleave one to another, then says the Community of Israel in the largeness of her affections: 'Set me a seal upon thy heart'" (p. 69-70). And there is much more of the same

"The Ten Sefirot" and the En Sof

With that diversity of spelling characteristic of the Talmudists, God is called the "eyn sof, the Infinite Neither shape nor form has he" (Note: small "h" always in referring to the Deity) "and no vessel exists to contain him, nor any means to apprehend him" (p. 79). And here comes the vicious crack at Christianity so common to Talmudism. Our "crime" is in ascribing Intelligence to God, in accepting Christ's words that He is the personification of the Father, a real and Loving Spirit: "he that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 14:9):

The Zohar: "woe to the man who would make bold to identify the Lord with any single attribute...and the less so any human form existent...there is neither attribute, nor likeness, nor form in him" (p. 78).

"Three Aspects of the Soul"

"The names and grades of the soul of man are three: 'nefesh' (vital soul), 'ruah' (spirit), 'neshamah' (innermost soul). The three are comprehended one within the other, but each has its separate abode. While the body in the grave is decomposing...nefesh tarries with it, and it hovers about in this world, going here and there among the living...Ruah betakes itself into the earthly Garden of Eden...On Sabbaths, New Moons and festival days, it ascends up to the supernal sphere...But neshamah ascends for forthwith to her place in the domain from which she emanated... when the children of men...betake themselves to the graves of those who are gone, then nefesh is wakened, and it goes out to bestir ruah, which then rouses... neshamah... (pp. 96-7).

Polytheism on Pagan Lines

Note in the Talmud that spirits of "oil and eggs" even, are consulted and flattered. "Appointed over all these stars and constellations of the heavens are heads and leaders and ministers and it behooves them to give service to the world, each in accordance with his designated function. Nor does the smallest blade of grass in the earth fail to have its specially appointed star in heaven. And also, every star has a designated BEING over it, to represent it according to due rank ... Acting as guardians over this world are all the stars of the firmaments, with each individual object of the world having a specially designated star to care for it. . Some, being at duty the whole night thru, cause the plant which is their special ward to spring up and flourish".

of the sages with their wives...in gladly carrying out the religious duty to have conjugal intercourse before the Presence" (p. 35). "It behooves a man to be 'male and female' always...in order that the Presence may never leave him" (p. 34).

THE MORRIS LOFF SERIES

Exhibit No. 1

THE PHARISEES

THE SOCIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THEIR FAITH

BY

LOUIS FINKELSTEIN

PROVOST AND SOLOMON SCHECHTER PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY AT THE JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA

VOLUME I

PHILADELPHIA

THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA

5706-1946

Exhibit No.2

Judaism. Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew eads his prayers, he is reciting formulae prepared by pre-Maccabean scholars; when he dons the cloak prescribed for the Day of Atonement and Passover Eve, he is wearing the festival garment of ancient Jerusalem; when he studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies.

Exhibit No. 3

the modern Hasidic movement, Rabbi Elijah Gaon of Wilna (1720-1797) the founder of the critical school of Talmudical exegesis, and Moses Mendelssohn (1729-1786) the creator of a renewed synthesis between traditional Judaism and the learning of the West.

As recently as the latter half of the nineteenth century, there were rabbis who in their mode of life, in their courage, and in their realization that the Law was given man for his happiness, were the equals of the greatest of the Pharisaic or the Talmudic sages. I am especially mindful of the lives and activities of two of these men, because my father, to whose inspiration I am so much indebted, in his youth stood in close touch with them — Rabbi Isaac Elhanan Spektor (1817–1896), a statesman-scholar, and Rabbi Israel Salanter (ca. 1800–1883), a saintly ascetic, and founder of the Musar (ethicist) movement in Lithuanian Judaism.

A number of incidents recorded of the lives of these men indicate how nearly they approached the ancient Pharisees in their human pity and realization that the Law was given to man for his happiness and his development. It is impossible to cite these stories here, but reference may be made to the excellent biography of Rabbi Israel Salanter in Professor Louis Ginzberg's Students, Saints and Scholars, and to the brief statement about Rabbi Isaac Elhanan Spektor in the Jewish Encyclopedia.

The lives of these men, and numerous others like them, demonstrate the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism as a religious movement. Yet it would have been alien to the purpose of this book to consider the Order from this point of view. This inquiry is essentially historical and sociological, seeking to determine how the Pharisees came into existence, and what their distinctive teachings

NEW EDITION

OF THE

Exhibit No. 4

Babylonian Talmud

Original Text Edited, Corrected, Formulated, and Translated into English

BY

MICHAEL L. RODKINSON

First Edition Revised and Corrected

BY

THE REV. DR. ISAAC M. WISE President Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati, O.

Volume I. TRACT SABBATH

SECOND EDITION, RE-EDITED, REVISED AND ENLARGED

BOSTON
NEW TALMUD PUBLISHING COMPANY
100 BOYLSTON STREET

The attacks on the Talmud have not been made by the enemies of the Jews alone. Large numbers of Jews themselves repudiate it, denying that they are Talmud Jews, or that they have any sympathy with it. Yet there are only the few Karaites in Russia and Austria, and the still fewer Samaritans in Palestine, who are really not Talmud Jews. Radical and Reform, Conservative and Orthodox, not only find their exact counterparts in the Talmud, but also follow in many important particulars the practices instituted through the Talmud, e.g., New Year's Day, Pentecost (so far as its date and significance are concerned), the QADDISH, etc. The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud,

According to others, in the eighth century. See our "History of the Talmud

THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD.

"Wisdom of The" Soges The Ex. 5

anything in them that must not be carried about on the Sabbath. Said R. Joseph: This is an important ordinance con-

"One shall not search for vermin," etc. Does it mean one shall not search for vermin in the day-time (of a Sabbath) lest he destroy any; and he shall not read before a lamp-light lest he snuff (the wick); or are both ordinances connected with each other so as to make the ordinance prohibiting the snuffing of the wick binding? Come and hear. "One shall not search for vermin nor read before the lamp-light." What can we understand from this Boraitha better than from our Mishna? Come and hear another Boraitha: "One shall not search before the lamp-light; also, one shall not read before it." These two ordinances are among the other established Halakhas In the attic of Hananiah b. Hyzkiyah b. Gorion. From this is to be

R. Jehudah in the name of Samuel said: One must not try to distinguish even between his own and his wife's garments (before the lamp-light). Said Rabha: This is said only for the inhabitants of Ma'hoza,* but among the dwellers of rural places the garments can easily be distinguished. And even among the inhabitants of Ma'hoza, only the garments of old women cannot easily be distinguished from those of the men, but not of young women.

We have learned, R. Simeon b. Elazar said: "One shall not kill vermin on the Sabbath." So said Beth Shamai; Beth Hillel, however, allowed this. R. Simeon b. Elazar used also to say in the name of R. Simeon b. Gamaliel: "One is not allowed to negotiate marriage engagements for children, nor to engage teachers or artisan masters for children, nor to pay visits of condolence to mourners, nor to visit the sick on the Sabbath. Such is the decree of Beth Shamai; Beth Hillel, however, allows all this."

^* Large cities where the men are effeminate and wear garments like the women,

THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD. (Rolkinson)
Vol. 8 (Sanhelrin) showing omission V
and also in the name of R. Aqiba, that it is not necessary, as i
the above verses there is a warning for both *)

Fr. 7

MISHNA VI.: A blasphemer is not guilty, unless he mentioned the proper name of God (Jehovah). Said R. Jehoshua b. Karha: Through the entire trial the witnesses are examined pseudonymously—i.e. (the blasphemer said): "Jose shall be beaten by Jose." (Rashi explains that the name Jose was selected because it contains four letters, as does the proper name of the Lord.) When the examination was ended, the culprit was not executed on the testimony under the pseudonym; but all are told to leave the room except the witnesses, and the oldest of them is instructed: "Tell what you heard exactly." And he does so. The judges then arise, and rend their garments, and they are not to be mended. The second witness then says: I heard exactly the same as he told. And so also says the third witness.

GEMARA: There is a Boraitha: One is not guilty unless he blesses (i.e., curses) the Holy Name by the Holy Name (as illustrated in the Mishna): "Jose shall be beaten by Jose." And whence is this deduced? Said Samuel: From Lev. xxiv. 16, of which the term in Hebrew is "we-nauquib shem," which means, "when he has cursed with the name." And whence do we know that the term "nauquib" means cursing? From [Num. xxiv. 8]: "How shall I curse," etc. And the warning as to this is [Ex. xxii. 27]: "Thou shalt not revile Elohim." But does not "nauquib" mean "hole"? Why, then, not so say—i.e., suppose one wrote the Holy Name on a piece of parchment and tore it, the term "we-yiqaub" [11 Kings, xii. 10]? meaning he "bored a hole in its lid"—and the warning as to which should be from [Deut. xii. 3, 4]: "Ye shall destroy their name out of the same place. Ye shall not do so to the Lord," etc. It was said above if the Name should be cursed by the Name, which is not the case here. But perhaps the term "nauquib" is meant as plainly expressed, as the same is used in Num. i. 17, "which are expressed by name" (i.e., it was forbidden to

the next Mishna treating of miserable crimes with men and animals, and giving the discussion with questions and answers, it would be undesirable to express in the English language. However, it seems to us important to give the opinion of Rabh: "A minor who was over nine years and one day is guilty, and may be punished the same as one of age, if he commit a crime with man, or an animal of any kind and age." (And there is a Boraitha which agrees with him.) This is all that we think proper to take from the text.

An Israelite once happened to leave his wine in the press. Meanwhile a heathen, who heard the roaring of a lion, ran into the press among the casks of wine for his life. Rabha allowed this wine, because the heathen will surely think that some Israelite, too, may chance to save himself here from the lion, and thus take him by surprise, were he to attempt at touching the wine. (Wine Touched by Gentile'is ruin Po In the city of Pumbeditha thieves once intruded into a house, and it was alterward feared that the casks of wine had been opened by them. As it was not certain whether the thieves were Jews or heathens, the case was brought before Rabha, who allowed the wine on the ground that the majority of thieves in that city are Jews. In a similar case that occurred in Nahardea, Samuel, too, allowed the wine.

A heathen girl was once found among the casks of Jewish wine, holding in her hands wine froth. Rabha allowed the wine, for she might have gotten the froth on the outside of the cask, which, though now no longer noticeable there, might have come out before by chance.

Soldiers once arrived at Nahardea and opened quite a number of Jewish casks. R. Dimi tells of a similar case that occurred in Palestine, and R. Elazar allowed the wine, with no definite reasons, however, to base this decision; he either guided himself by the opinion of R. Eliezar, who holds that a doubt as to whether or no a heathen came near the wine found open is a reason to allow it; or he assumed that the majority of the soldiers were Jews.

A Jewish woman, dealing in wine, once left her keys in charge of a heathen, and the question came up as to whether her wine she has in the tavern is allowed? Said R. Itz'hak in the name of R. Elazar: A similar case was once cited before the sages assembled in college, and they allowed the wine; because entrusting one with the taking care of the key by no means allows him into the room. Abayi said: A like decision is pronounced in the following Boraitha: When one leaves to the care of an ignoramus the keys of his barn where fruit is stored up, the fruit is not defiled, because the keeper of the key is only appointed to watch the key. It is thus obvious that, since in the case of an ignoramus who is ignorant of the rules regarding cleanness the fruit is none the less allowed, the more so in case of the wine. It must, moreover, be concluded from here that the provisions of wine are not so stringent as those of

The persecutors of the Talmud during the period ranging from the first century B.C., when it began to take form, to the present day, have varied in their character, objects and actions. In one respect, however, they all agreed, namely, in their general wish to destroy its existence. Careful consideration of its many vicissitudes certainly justifies the assertion that the Talmud is one of the wonders of the world. During the twenty centuries of its existence not one of them has passed without great and powerful enemies vying with each other and exhausting every effort to destroy it; still it survived in its entirety, and not only has the power of its foes failed to destroy even a single line, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. It still dominates the minds of a whole people, who venerate its contents as divine truth, and countless numbers have sacrificed their lives and their possessions to save it from perishing.

Before the development of the Talmud had been completed, when hardly a single section had been arranged systematically and written down, it having been known merely as oral teaching in the mouths of the sages, and reconsidered and analyzed constantly by their disciples in the colleges, it was violently attacked. But no sooner had the Talmud been completed in Babylonia, and the Saburites had put their seal upon it, so to speak, deciding that nothing was to be added to or substracted from, when Justinian decreed practically its death; that is to say, what amounted to the same thing, capital punishment to all those who were occupied in its study (550). Then followed the Karaites, in the days of the Gaonim, who seriously threatened

THE HISTORY OF THE TALMUD.

Exhibit 10

CHAPTER I.

THE ORIGIN OF THE NAME "TALMUD"—THE SAMARITANS—ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES—THE SADDUCEES.

The name "written law" was given to the Pentateuch, Prophets and Hagiographa, and that of "oral law" to all the teachings of the "sages" consisting of comments on the text of the Bible. The word Torah alone was applied to the entire Bible, the term "Talmud" was reserved for the oral law, though the meaning of these two words is identical; namely, "teaching" or "study." Still, because it is written Velindo (Deut. xxxi, 19), and teach it the children of Israel (put it in their mouths; that is to say that the teacher's duty was to explain and comment on the laws and ordinances until the children understood them thoroughly and were conversant with them by heart)—the name "Talmud" was applied to what was styled by a long phrase "Oral Law" (Torah-she b'al-Peh). This word designated all the commentaries of the sages on the Scriptures which the Pharisees had begun to interpret figuratively.

Figurative interpretation was inaugurated in the days of the Great Assembly when its members resolved to keep themselves distinct from the Samaritans, their inveterate enemies, who adhered to the literal interpretation of the text, which, in the opinion of the Pharisees, was falsified by them. This study, however, commenced to make progress at the time of the Sanhedrin, or from that of the Macedonian conquest of Judea, when the term "Great Assembly" was changed to the Greek "Sanhedrin." It spread into every college where were assembled sages entrusted with the guidance of congregations, with instruction of the Law, of ordinances relating to clean and unclean, to prop-

A desire to know all that has befallen the Tahmud and all its vicissitudes since its inception would require the reading of all the scattered passages in countless volumes which have been compiled in various ages, languages, and countries. Its history, however, has never yet been written by a single author. Treaties on the Tahmud itself, or on certain subjects contained therein, have briefly related part of its history, each according to the subject and the aim of its theme. Such are the works of Zunz and Grätz, the one dealing with rabbinical literature, and the other writing concerning the history of the Jews. Similarly the historians of the world, relating in detail the occurrences of every century, have briefly made mention of what happened to the Tahmud in each century. Even in the year there appeared a pamphlet entitled "Ankläger und Vertheidiger des Tahmud" (accusers and defenders), by Dr. B. Kurrein, of Frankfort-on-the-Main, apparently giving the entire history of

erty, to crimes. All sages who interpreted the biblical passages figuratively, unlike the Samaritans, were called "Pharisees." The Samaritans of course persecuted those Pharisees (see App. No. 1), objected to their interpretation, and did them great injury whenever they had the power. At last, Janai, Hyrcanus the First, overcame them, burned their temple, devastated their city, and compelled them by force of arms to conduct themselves according to the doctrines of the Pharisees, though he himself in his latter years became a Sadducee.

leadership of Joshuah b. Prachia, Simon b. Shetah and Jehudah b. Tabai. The Talmud was then studied in all colleges of Palestine, Egypt and wherever Jews lived. Owing to the enmity of the Samaritans and the opposition of the Sadducees, many laws and regulations were added to the Talmud of the Pharisees. From that time the Pharisees began to restrict their interpretations so as to make them agree with the deep though literal meaning of the texts, employing therein much sophistry. They counted all the letters of the Torah, and if they found a word or letter not absolutely necessary to the understanding of the text, they said it was placed there only to add to or subtract from the meaning. But at that period the Mishna was not a separate and distinct thing from the Talmud, though many ancient Mishnas already existed in writing, but without a separate title. The Pharisees studied the ancient Mishnayoth, added (see App. No. 4) to them, and explained the biblical texts. All this was entitled Oral Law, or, shortly, "Talmud."

THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TALMUD DURING THE LAST CENTURY

OF THE SECOND TEMPLE'S EXISTENCE (i.e. THE FIRST A.C.)

SHEMAIA—ABTALIAN—HILLEL—SHAMMAI—THE PRINCES

(NASIS) OF ISRAEL—R. JOHANAN B. ZAKKAI—SANHEDRIN

OF IAMNIA—THE IEWISH CHRISTIANS.

After the triumph of Simon b. Shetah over the Sadducees, when he had finally cleared the Sanhedrin of them, and only the Pharisees remained there, the development of the Talmud progressed rapidly, for the number of the sages, the adherents, reverers, sanctifiers of the Talmud, increased greatly in the colleges of the Ashkaloth (Duumviri) who succeeded to ben Shetah: Shemaia and Abtalian, and, after them, Hillel and Shammai. And although at that time new enemies arose, in the Boethuseans, Essenes, and many other sects who were opposed to its particular doctrines, yet those had not the power to check its progress or to weaken its influence—not only on all Israelites, wherever they dwelt, but also on many Gentiles: for at that time we see that prominent persons of other nations (App. No. 5) come to the chief men of Israel and express their wish to

Ex. 14

CHAPTER III.

THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE—THE FALL OF BETHEL—THE

MASSACRE OF THE SAGES OF THE TALMUD, TILL THE WRITING OF THE MISHNA IN THE BEGINNING OF THE THIRD CENTURY

The Temple had been destroyed; Rabban Gamaliel and many of his colleagues were dead; the family of the Nasi extirpated, excepting only his son R. Simeon, who succeeded to his father as Nasi and established a college at Usha; and new persecutions, awful in their extent, were directed against those who were engaged in the compilation of the Talmud. The sages, the chief men of Israel, were slaughtered without pity by Trajan and his successors through the entire period of fifty-two years from the destruction of the Talmud who forfeited their lives for its sake are known to us only by their names: R. Ishmael, Simeon b. Azai, Papus b. Jehudah, Yishbab the Scribe, Huzpeth the Dragoman (interpreter), Jehudah the Baker, Hananiah b. Tradion and Aqiba; the last, the main pillar of the Talmud, and who contributed much to its diffusion and completion, died with joy at being enabled to sacrifice his life for it.

One of the causes of the great revolt against the Romans at this time was the prohibition by the Roman government of the study of the Torah, wherein alone the Jews found comfort, since only in their houses of learning could they enjoy complete peace and freedom. But as the death penalty had been decreed against all who occupied themselves with religious study and observed its precepts, and as this prohibition deprived them of their only source of consolation, they rebelled, led by Bar Kochba. R. Aqiba was the first to become his adherent, who journeyed from town to town, inciting the Israelites to rebel, and bringing them the message that a saviour of Israel had arisen in Bar Kochba, the Messiah. It is not surprising, therefore, that Hadrian when he had ascended to the throne, was not content barely with the massacre of the sages of the Talmud, but was intent also on the destruction of the Talmud itself. Unable to find a pretext for killing all the sages who kept it up, he decreed that if any of the old rabbis should

Thus the efforts of Hadrian met with no success, so that at last he said to himself: "Great is the sheep that stands among seventy wolves." He saw the Talmud still existing, bringing to naught his plan for converting the Jews, uniting Israel into one people, and establishing it still more firmly as a national and a religious whole. For the six rabbis named above very soon became the soul of Talmudic study; some of them were with R. Simeon, the Nasi, in Shprehem, and others founded colleges of their own. Through them the Talmud regained its former power and influence, and one of them, R. Ilai, became the chief teacher of R. Jehudah the Nasi, the compiler of the Mishna.

The translation of the Bible (written law) into Greek also contributed very much to the popularization of the Talmud. As long, as the Torah was in the sacred language only (for the Aramaic version of the time of Ezra had been concealed or destroyed as early as the time of Rabban Gamaliel the Elder, the son of Simeon who had been slain, or probably even during the

that the president of Sura, which was of far greater repute, was elected at that time, though his name is not mentioned in the chronicles.

With Babram's fall the vengeance of the lawful heir to the throne, Prince Chosru, was visited on the Jews. With the aid of the Byzantine emperor, Mauritius, and the loyal portion of the Persian people, he defeated the usurper, putting to the sword also the greater part of the Jewish population of Machuza, and probably of other cities as well.

adherers to Scripture obliterated -

OPPOSITION OF THE KARAITES. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SECT OF THAT NAME.

The Pharisees had been victorious over the Sadducees and the other sects opposed to the Oral Law, but had not annihilated them entirely; since only because these latter could not withstand them, they kept silence and were discontented in their hearts. As the Talmud gained strength and became more severe in its decrees against the Sadducees and Samaritans, so that in the end the Kuthing were declared as idolaters in all respects, then their indignation burned and they awaited a favorable time for revenge. In the time of the dominance of the Gaonim, who carried out the Talmud in practice, the measure became full, and Anan, the nephew of the Gaon at Sura, when he was not elected as Gaon, for the reason of his liberal ideas and his opposition to the Talmud, established the Karaite sect.

Those who hold that the Karaites were a new sect founded by Anan (760 C.E.), are mistaken, for a small sect under the name of Karaites, or adherents of the Text, had existed already in the days of the Talmud, where they are mentioned in many places, as "adherents of the Text," or once "the Karaites add" (Pesachim, 117a in text; in our edition, Vol. V., p. 145). Doubtless the remainder of the Sadducees assumed this name, having lost political influence since they had been vanquished, and the word "Sadducees" being hated by the people. Therefore the remains of the sect called themselves "Karaites," i.e.

THE HISTORY OF THE TALMUD. Ex. 17

among their European brethern, for the benefit of cacouraging a more assiduous study of the Talmud at the college of Sura; the vessel being captured by an Arab pirate, the four sages were sold as slaves. One, R. Shemariah b. El'hanan was then brought to Alexandria; there the Jewish community ransomed him, and appointed him as supervisor of religion and teacher of the Talmud in Cairo. The second, R. Hushiel, was sold into slavery at the African coast, and brought to Kairuban. The third, R. Moses b. Enoch was ransomed from his owners after many hardships, at Cordova, where the community chose him as Rabbi. The name of the fourth has not transpired. It is possible that he reached France. The four men, not having attained their object of collecting money for Sura, and its college having been closed seven hundred years after its foundation, brought to an end the spiritual dominion of Babylonia over the Jewish mind and scattered the seeds of Talmudic study throughout all lands.

CHAPTER IX.

their abode—this spiritual dominion waned greatly. The glory of these colleges irresistibly declined, in spite of all efforts to the contrary, even of a supreme man like Saadiah the Gaon. The spirit of investigation and free thought at Bagdad induced the disciples, to whom the religious teachings of their master Saadiah gave the example, to engage in the study of philosophy, grammar and the interpretations of the text of the Scripture, and to abandon the hard and exhausting studies of Sura. A slight cause, the voyage of the four scholars mentioned above to Europe, sufficed to hasten the end of this college, which did not exist long after the death of R. Saadiah the Gaon, so that it was closed forever after centuries of its existence.

The college at Pumbeditha continued some time longer; it put forth its last efforts, before the lights of its Gaonim and Exilarchs were extinguished, before the glory and religious and spiritual pre-eminence of Babylon departed from there to honor Spain; and as the light of a candle blazes up before it is extinguished, so there shone on the Babylonian horizon three Gaonim, Sherira b. Hanina, Hai his son, and Samuel b. Hophni the father-in-law of the latter (960-1038). The activity of these men in the field of Talmudic literature persists and exercise their influence yet.

R. Sherira placed the Talmudic studies too much above all other studies, whereas in the college at Sura, in accordance with the spirit of Saadiah the Gaon, the sciences also stood in the first rank of studies and a critical spirit reigned in studying Scripture and in commenting on the Talmud. At Pumbeditha the Talmud was the only dish offered to the students, the only subject of the curriculum. R. Sherira was the first who fearlessly taught and said: "The utterances of the Gaonim require no demonstration; whoso rebels against their decisions, rebels against God and betrays His Torah." His book "Megilath Stharim" (Scroll of Mysteries), which was undoubtedly written in this autocratic spirit, is lost. But, on the other hand, he has bequeathed to us a fragment which enlightens us at present, being the chief basis of all Jewish literary and theological history. This is the letter he sent to the congregation of Kairuban, termed "R. Sherira's Epistle," which treats of the history of the Talmud and of the Gaonim and is the key to the otherwise mysterious history of that epoch. From this letter only can

It will be in place here, before further consideration of the character and consequences of this and many other disputes in which Jewish apostates were the accusers and disputants, to speak of the Jews of the Middle Ages, what they were, and, having in view only the truth, to expose their faults. For by their great intolerance, and their conduct towards all who entertained opinions of the least liberality, differing ever so

With the conclusion of the first volume of this work at the beginning of the twentieth century, we would invite the reader to take only a glance over the past of the Talmud, in which he will see that in almost every century and place of the different countries in Europe, the Talmud was condemned to the stake. By a glance over the present time, however, he will see that not only was the Talmud not destroyed, but was so saved that not eyen a single letter of it is missing; and now it is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its past history, as will be seen further on.

The details of all the persecutions of the Talmud were given in the preceding chapters. Here we give a list of the places and dates in which it was at the stake, as well as the names of the persecutors.

When Christians Knew about the Island

1322.—Burned in Rome by order of Pope John XXII., and accompanied by robbery and murder of the Jews by the mob.

1553.—Rome: Pope Julius III.—Similar burnings by the same order took place in Barcelona, Venice, Romagna, Urbino and Pesaro.

Here three wagons full of books were burned; but first they were carried through the streets of the city, while royal officers proclaimed publicly that their condemnation was due to the insults to Christianity which they contained. (See also note, vol. ii. p. 52.)

1554 Burned by hundreds and thousands in Ancona Ferrara, Mantua, Padna, Candia and Ravenna.

1558. • Rome: Cardinal Ghislieri.

1559. Rome: Sextus Sinensis.

1560. Poland: Talmud burned because of the charge made against the Jews that they used the blood of Christian children in their ceremonies. This occurred during the Frankist disturbances.

Talmud flourishes in America

Such was the past of the Talmud which we hope will never be repeated. Now a glance at the end of the last century and

the beginning of this one.

The colleges for the study of the Talmud are increasing almost in every place where Israel dwells, especially in this country where millions are gathered for the funds of the two great colleges, the Hebrew Union College of Cincinnati and the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in New York, in which the chief study is the Talmud and its post-talmudical literature. The heads of these colleges are of the most learned scholars of their time, who are very careful in selecting the professors and instructors for these institutions of learning. We were honored to be present at some lectures which the late great Talmudist, Professor Mielziner, delivered before the senior class in Cincinnati, from which we derived great pleasure and, we may also say that in some instances they were to a degree instructive to us in our task of translating the Talmud.

There are also in our city houses of learning (Jeshibath) for the study of the Tahnud in the lower East Side, where many young men are studying the Tahnud every day.

We are also glad to notice that among Gentiles the study

Now we will stop for a moment to see who the Karaite sect was. There is no doubt that there existed a sect by this name in the days of the Talmudists, for they are mentioned several times in the Talmud under the name "Adherers to the Scripture," (RDDDD), and in one place it is plainly stated "the Karaites added" (Pesachim, p. 117; our edition, p. 246, see foot note 3). Neither is there any doubt that they were not favored by the Talmudists, as we find in many places in the Talmud remarks reflecting on them, as f.i.: "They who occupy themselves with the study of Scripture are not to be blamed, but, on the other hand, not to be praised" (Baba Metzia, 79), and in Hagiga, it states plainly; Rabb said: "If a man goes out from the study of the Mishna to read the verses of the Bible, this man can have no more peace." And there is no doubt that many similar remarks found in the Talmud have reference to this sect. But we can not, with exactness, fix the time when and to what extent this sect openly declared against the teachings of the Talmudists. However, we do not hesitate for one moment to state that during all that time this sect has brooded an intense hatred to every Israelite who has not followed them, although at times they were compelled to conceal their hatred.

One penetrating glance into the history of the Samaritans and into that of the Karaites; one penetrating glance into the literature of the former and into that of the latter; the curses pronounced by both of those sects against the followers of the Rabbanism; the beliefs and principles common to the religion of both (although differing slightly ceremonially), will suffice to induce one to agree with us that the Karaites, whose sect was established in the days of Anan, and a few of whom are living in our own time, have not only borrowed from the Samaritans their teachings, but that the Karaites are the former Samaritans and that even up to date they have changed slightly only in their outward appearance and

From the whole sect we will pick out only Anan, who descended from the family of the Exilarch, who came from the house of David (and perhaps was his mother or grandmother of Samaritan descent), and who, from jealously having scorned and despised

150 Karaites cursed as "idolators Ex. 25

The toleration of the Pharises and of their teachings is well known. The disciples of the Beth Hillel have done all that lay in their power to bring them into the house of Israel: they credited them in regard to purification; they permitted them to be counted in the number of three for the benediction over the meal (מוֹכְין (מוֹכִין)), and in the number of ten for prayer in the prayer house (מוֹכִין); and in fact, wanted to consider them as Israelites for all purposes, but their animosity and trickery increased to such an extent that they could no more be tolerated, and therefore, the leaders of Israel were compelled to regard them in all respects as idolators, and prohibited their bread, wine, and oil Exactly the same thing happened with the Karaites whom the Rabbanism endeavored, with all their might, to draw near them and debate with them, until they convinced themselves that their hatred toward Israel is so great that they said "מוֹצְיוֹ (the rents will never be sewed together), "the Karaites will never make up with us," and they are up to date regarded as idolators (has a second a the respect to Scrubture.")

We know well that we are too brief in this article and that we ought to adduce at length all the facts to prove that all that the Samaritans and Karaites have done unto Israel was not to derive any benefit therefrom, or with a view of subduing them, for they

An example may be given of the last century when a new sect (Chasidim) established themselves. The greatest authority, at least in Russia and Poland, Eliah Wilna, called the "Wilner Gaon" in conjunction with all the Rabbis, excommunicated the whole sect, prohibited their eatings and beverages and intermarriage with them. Moreover he allowed any one to denounce the new sect, and their rabbis were lamprisoned by the government. But what was the end? Nothing at all. All the excommunications, prohibitions, prosecutions, etc., were abolished, without even the result of a meeting, and as soon as the quarrel was over, not one of either party hesitated to mingle with the opposite sect. All are called Israel, all are Israelites, and at the present time nobody gives any attention to all that happened then.

But Red Jews Nont to use Karaites 157

well knew that this was an impossibility, but only out of blind hatred deeply rooted in them, which descends from generation to generation. We know this very well, but we can not enter here into such details, as it would exceed the limits of an article, and would comprise a whole book in itself. We, therefore, rely upon the intelligence and knowledge of the reader that he will know where to find those if needed.

Even in our own times, when the Karaites number only a few thousands, which accounts for their enjoying equal rights with the natives, since Emperor Nicholas of Russia, they make no secret of their hatred toward Israel. When the anti-Jewish disorders broke out in Russia some few years ago, and many of our coreligionists were exiled from the Middle States of the Russian Empire, the latter have petitioned the Russian Government to be permitted to embrace Karaitism. The Minister of the Interior has expressed his willingness to grant their petition if the Karaites will consent to receive them into their midst, and directed an inquiry to this effect to their Hacham in Odessa, but the latter answered that there is no desire on the part of the Karaites to receive the lews as their co-religionists.

These facts need hardly any comment; they speak for themselves. In fact, during all the long period since the year 760, it has not as yet happened that even a few individual Karaites should intermarry with our co-religionists, or should in any way associate with us. (Even in business affairs they do it only with great reluctance and very seldom.) Is there any stronger proof necessary of this race-hatred? No other race or nation, no matter how great their hatred may be, will ever decline to receive into their midst a lew, if he only wishes to gain their faith, and will never refuse to associate with him; and the masses, as well as the intelligent classes, have always been favorably inclined toward the Jews. But this hatred of the Karaites has no equal among other nations in any generation. They know 127 wife.

As the Samaritans have forged and falsified the Pentateuch, as is now well established, so also did the Karaites forge and talsify the Talmud. And we hereby reproach the writers of the history of the Karaites, who without much deliberations wrote; For Saadiah the Gaon, when king, unable to assign any good reason for a statement found in the Talmud (Jerushalmi), that the Beth Shammai have killed some of the Beth Hillel, and vice versa, has denied the existence of such a statement at all; and Sahl, the son of Matzliah, his opponent, in order to prove to the world the delinquency of R. Saadiah, has descended from Palestine to Babylonia with the

$\Gamma$ H E $_{\text{Ex. 28}}$

B A B Y L O N I A N T A L M U D

SEDER NEZIKIN

TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH

WITH NOTES, GLOSSARY AND INDICES

UNDER THE EDITORSHIP OF

RABBI DRI, EPSTEIN

B.A., Ph. D., D, Lic.

FOREWORD BY
THE VERY REV. THE CHIEF RABBI

DR J. H. HERTZ

THE EDITOR

LONDON
THE SONCINO PRESS
1935

B A B A K A M M A

TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH
Ex. 29
WITH NOTES, GLOSSARY

RY

E. W. KIRZNER, M. A., Ph. D., M. Sc.

LONDON THE SONCINO PRESS 1935

FOREWORD

BY. Exhibit No. 30

THE VERY REV. THE CHIEF RABBI Dr J. H. HERTZ

The Talmud is the product of Palestine, the land of the Bible, and of Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilisation. The beginnings of Talmudic literature date back to the time of the Babylonian Exile in the sixth pre-Christian century, before the Roman Republic had yet come into existence. When, a thousand years later, the Babylonian Talmud assumed final codified form in the year 500 after the Christian era, the Western Roman Empire had ceased to be. That millenium opens with the downfall of Babylon as a world-power; it covers the rise, decline and fall of Persia, Greece and Rome; and it witnesses the spread of Christianity and the disappearance of Paganism in Western and Near Eastern lands.

- Satanism incarnate

The Babylonian Exile is a momentous period in the history of humanity—and especially so in that of Israel. During that Exile, Israel found itself. It not only rediscovered the Torah and made it the rule of life, but under its influence new religious institutions, such as the synagogue, i.e., congregational worship without priest or ritual, came into existence—one of the most far-reaching spiritual achievements in the whole history of Religion. At the re-establishment of the Jewish Commonwealth, Ezra the Sofer, or Scribe, in the year 444 B.C.E. formally proclaimed the Torah the civil and religious law of the new Commonwealth. He brought with him all the oral traditions that were taught in the Exile, and he dealt with the new issues that confronted the struggling community in that same spirit which had created the synagogue. His successors, called after him Soferim ('Scribes'), otherwise

Hillel. He is the best known of all the rabbis, renowned for his enunciation of the Golden Rule, 'Whatsoever is hateful unto thee, do it not to thy fellow; this is the whole Torah, the rest is but commentary.' He was the embodiment of meekness and humanity. 'Love peace, and pursue peace, love thy fellow-creatures and bring them near to the 'Torah,' was his motto. He popularised seven exegetical rules for the interpretation of the Torah—e.g., the rules of inference, and analogy—by which the immanent meaning of Scripture might better be brought out; and he divided the mass of traditions that in his day constituted the Oral Law into the six main Orders, which division was accepted by all his successors.

Of the 150 Tannaim, or 'teachers', who may be called the architects of the spiritual edifice which in its completed form is known as the Mishnah, it is necessary to mention three more besides Hillel. These are Johanan ben Zakkai, Rabbi Akiba, and Rabbi Judah the Prince. Johanan ben Zakkai was the youngest of Hillel's disciples. By his Academy at Jabneh, he rescued Judaism from the shipwreck of the Roman destruction that overwhelmed the Jewish nation in the year 70. Jabneh became the rallying ground of Jewish Learning and the centre of Jewish spiritual life. Like nearly every one of the rabbis, he earned his bread by manual labour. Judaism, he held. could outlive its political organism; and charity and love of men replaced the Sacrificial Service. A good heart', he declared, was the most important thing in life.

In the following generation, Akiba was the author of a collection of traditional laws out of which the Mishnah actually grew. He was the greatest among the rabbis of his own and of succeeding times, the man of whom—as the legend says—even Moses was for a moment jealous when in a vision he was given a glimpse of the distant future. His keen and penetrating intellect enabled him to find a Biblical basis for every provision of the Oral Law. Romance illumines the early life of this great rabbi and mystic. In 1 32 he died a martyr's death for his God and People. On the day that Akiba died was born R. Judah the Prince, also called simply 'Rabbi'. He was a descendant of Hillel in the seventh generation, and a man of uncommon ability, wide culture and lofty virtue. As Patriarch—

destruction of the Temple no Academy existed in Jerusalem. It was Tiberias that was the principal seat of rabbinic learning, till the closing of the Palestinian schools in the 4th century.

The principal Teachers (now called Amoraim, 'expounders') of the Palestinian Talmud are Rabbis Johanan and Abbahu.

Abbahu of Caesarea was a man of wealth, general culture and influence with the Roman authorities. He was a skilful defender of his Faith against Christian attacks. 'Be of the persecuted not of the persecutors,' was his maxim. He put forward the bold notion of successive creations—the idea later taken up by the Jewish Mystics that prior to the existence of the present universe, certain formless worlds issued from the Fountain of existence and then vanished, like sparks from a red-hot iron beaten by a hammer.

The oppression in Palestine under the first Christian emperors led to the extinction of the Patriarchate and to the closing of the Schools in the year 425. The discussions in these Schools were never formally edited. It seems that the Palestinian Gemara originally extended over the whole of the Mishnah; but owing to the adverse circumstances of the time, much of it has been irretrievably lost.

Venice in 1523. Frankel's classical Introduction to the Jerusalem Tahnud appeared in 1859. There is a French translation of the Palestinian Tahnud by M. Schwab.

ΙV

When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealing with what most people understand when they speak or write of the Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an autonomous Jewish centre for a longer period than any other land; namely, from soon after 586 before the Christian era to the year 1040 after the Christian era—1626 years; from the days of Cyrus down to the age of the Mongol conquerors!

This is not the place to speak of the influence of the Talmud; how throughout the centuries of persecution and darkness, it saved Israel from intellectual and moral degradation. My purpose is merely to give a brief presentation of the Talmud as a book. I shall therefore conclude with the words of I. Abrahams. 'The Talmud,' he says, 'is one of the great books of the world. Rabbinism was a sequel to the Bible; and if, like all sequels, it was unequal to its original, it nevertheless shares its greatness. The works of all Jews up to the modern period were the sequel to this sequel. Through them all may be detected the unifying principle that literature in its truest sense includes life itself; that intellect is the handmaid to conscience; and that the best books are those which best teach men how to live. The maxim, Righteousness delivers from death, applies to books as well as to men. A literature whose consistent theme is Righteousness, is immortal.'

Former deletions included

A reliable English translation of the whole Babylonian Talmud has long been looked forward to by scholars. This expectation is beginning to be realised by the publication of the Soncino edition of the Order Nezikin.

The translation is based on the Text of the Wilna Talmud, corrected where necessary in the light of variants from MSS, and other printed editions. All the censored passages reappear in the Text or in the Notes. The Notes bring the essence of the classical interpretations, clarify the argument, explain technical expressions, and show in what sense the Biblical verses quoted are to be understood. Wherever possible, place-names are identified, historical and archaeological allusions elucidated, and their parallels in the life of contemporary nations traced.

This notable achievement is due to the quite extraordinary erudition of the Editor, Rabbi Dr I. Epstein, assisted by his staff of scholarly translators. The Editor's Prefatory Note gives some indication of his colossal task. Aside from planning the scope and character of the work, the Editor fixed the Text, controlled the

FOREWORD Exhibit No. 36

translation and interpretation, as well as the introductions and glossaries to the various parts, and supplied the greater portion of the 'cultural' notes.

The Publishers too have done their share in the undertaking conscientiously and efficiently. With the result, that never before has there appeared a translation of the Order Nezikin as helpful to the student as these volumes of the Soncino edition of the Babylonian Talmud in English.

J. H. HERTZ

London, Chanukah 5695 2 December 1934 By Easter I. ROBILETION Exhibit 37 important variants of manuscript and printed editions some of which have been adopted in the main body of the translation, the reason for such preference being generally explained or indicated in the Notes. All the censored passages appear either in the text or in the Notes.

Notes. The main purpose of these is to elucidate the translation by making clear the course of the arguments, explaining allusions and technical expressions, thus providing a running commentary on the text. With this in view resort has been made to the standard Hebrew commentators, Rashi, the Tosafists, Asheri, Alfasi, Maintonides, Maharsha, the glosses of Bald, Rashal, Strashun, the Wilna Gaon, etc.! Advantage has also been taken of the results of modern scholarship, such as represented by the names of Graetz, Bacher, Weiss, Halevy, Levy, Kohut, Jastrow, and happily still with us—Krauss, Büchler, Ginzberg, Obermeyer, Klein and Herford among others, in dealing with matters of general cultural interest with which the Talmud teems—historical, geographical, archaeological, philological and social.

GLOSSARY AND INDICES. Each Tractate is equipped with a Glossary wherein recurring technical terms are fully explained, thus obviating the necessity of explaining them afresh each time they appear in the text. To this has been added a Scriptural Index and a General Index of contents.

In the presentation of the tractates the following principles have also been adopted:

(i) The Mishnah and the words of the Mishnah recurring and commented upon in the Gemara are printed in capitals.

⁽¹⁾ These names are referred to more fully in the list of Abbreviations at the end of each Tractate.

• (ii) printroducing a Mishnah cited in the Gemara, is rendered 'we have learnt'.

• (ווו) מניא introducing a Baraitha, is rendered 'it has been (or was) taught'.

• (וע) הגי רבנן introducing a Tannaitic teaching, is rendered 'Our-Rabbis taught'.

• (v) Where an Amora cites a Tannaitic teaching the word 'learnt' s used, e.g., יתני רב יוכף, 'R. Joseph learnt'.

• (vi) The word tanna designating a teacher of the Amoraic period (v. Glos.) is written with a small 't'.

• (ix) ארבינא, lit.. 'The Merciful One', has been rendered 'the Divine Law' in cases where the literal rendering may appear somewhat incongruous to the English ear.

• (x) Biblical verses appear in italics except for the emphasized word or words in the quotation which appear in Roman characters.

• (xi) No particular English version of the Bible is followed, as the Talmud has its own method of exegesis and its own way of understanding Biblical verses which it cites. Where, however, there is a radical departure from the English versions, the rendering of a recognised English version is indicated in the Notes. References to chapter and verse are those of the Massoretic Hebrew text.

• (xii) Any answer to a question is preceded by a dash(-), except where the question and the answer form part of one and the same statement.

• (xiii) Inverted commas are used sparingly, that is, where they are deemed essential or in dialogues.

  • (xiv) The archaic second person 'thou', 'thee' etc. is employed

Raba said: Where an ox upon hearing the sound of a trumpet gores and upon hearing [again] the sound of a trumpet gores [a second time], and upon hearing [again] the sound of a trumpet gores [a third time], the ox will become Mu'ad with reference to the hearing of the sound of trumpets. Is not this self-evident?—You might have supposed that [the goring at] the first [hearing of the sound of the] trumpet [should not be taken into account as it] might have been due merely to the sudden fright that came over the ox. We are therefore told [that it would be taken into account].²

A non-Jew has no property rights Sec Exp. 268-70

MISHNAH. In the case of private owner's Cattle Goring an OX consecrated to the temple, or consecrated cattle goring a private OX, there is no liability, for it is stated: the OX of his neighbour, 5 not [that is to say] an OX consecrated to the temple. Where an OX belonging to an israelite has gored an OX belonging to a canaanite, there is no liability, 6 whereas where an OX belonging to a canaanite gores an OX belonging to an israelite, whether while tam OR MU'AD, 7 the compensation is to be made in full. 8

TEMARA. The [ruling in the] Mishnah is not in accordance

⁽¹⁾ So that full compensation should begin with the fifth occasion. (2) And full liability will commence with the fourth goring at the sound of a trumpet. (3) [Mishnah text: 'of an Israelite'.] (4) Lit., 'ox'. (5) Ex. XXI, 35. (6) As Canaanites did not recognise the laws of social justice, they did not impose any liability for damage done by cattle. They could consequently not claim to be protected by a law they neither recognised nor respected; cf. J. T. a.l. and Maim. Yal, Niz. Mam. VIII, 5. [In ancient Israel as in the modern state the legislation regulating the protection of life and property of the stranger was, as Guttmann, M. (HIICA, III 1 ff.) has shown, on the basis of reciprocity. Where such reciprocity was not recognised, the stranger could not claim to enjoy the same protection of the law as the cutzen.] (7) I.e., the ox that did the damage. (8) So that they should guard their cattle from doing damage. (Maim. loc. cit.)

Raba adheres to his own view as [elsewhere] stated by Raba, that a Hebrew slave is actually owned in his body by the master.

R. Bibi b. Giddal said that R. Simeon the Pious stated: The robbery of a heathen is prohibited, though an article lost by him is permissible. His robbery is prohibited, for R. Huna said: Whence do we learn that the robbery of a heathen is prohibited? Because it says: 'And thou shalt consume all the peoples that the Lord thy God shall deliver unto thee'; only in the time [of war] when they were delivered in thy hand [as enemies] this is permitted, whereas this is not so in the time [of peace] when they are not delivered in thy hand [as enemies]. His lost article is permissible, for R. Hama b. Guria said that Rab stated: Whence can we learn that the lost article of a heathen is permissible? Because it says: And with all lost thing of thy brother's: it is to your brother that you make restoration, but you need not make restoration to a heathen. But why not say that this applies only where the lost article has not yet come into the possession of the finder, in which case he is under no obligation to look round for it, whereas if it had already entered his possession, why not say that he should return it.—Said Rabina: And thou hast found it surely implies that the lost article has aready come into his possession.

It was taught: R. Phinehas b. Yair said that where there was a danger of causing a profanation of the Name even the retaining of a lost article of a heathen is a crime. Samuel said: It is permissible, however, to benefit by his mistake as in the case when Samuel once bought of a heathen a golden bowl under the assumption of it being of copper 10 for four zuz, and also left him minus one zuz. R. Kahana once bought of a heathen a hundred and twenty barrels which were

⁽¹⁾ Kid. 16a. [To withdraw therefore the slave without payment of redemption money amounts to actual robbery.] (2) Cf. B.M. 87b and Bek. 13b; v. also Tosef. B.K. X, 8 where it is stated that it is more criminal to rob a Canaanite than to rob an Israelite; cf. B.M. II, 5. (3) Deut. VII, 16. (4) I.e., it is not subject to the law of lost property; Deut. XXII, 1-3. V.B.M. (Sonc. ed.) p. 149, n. 6. (5) Deut. XXII, 1-3. (6) Ibid. XXII, 3. (7) B.M. 2a. (8) I.e., the finder's. (9) Of Israel and his God; V. The Chief Rabbi's commentary on Lev. XXII, 32. (10) Cf. however n. 9. (heat in A Gentiles. 1 a Valid.)

supposed to be a hundred while he similarly left him minus one zuz¹ and said to him; 'See that I am relying upon you.' Rabina together with a heathen bought a palm-tree to chop up [and divide]. He thereupon said to his attendant: Quick, bring to me the parts near to the roots, for the heathen is interested only in the number [but not in the quality]. R. Ashi was once walking on the road when he noticed branches of vines outside a vineyard upon which ripe clusters of grapes were hanging. He said to his attendant: 'Go and see, if they belong to a heathen bring them to me but if to an Israelite do not bring them to me.' The heathen happened to be then sitting in the vineyard and thus overheard this conversation, so he said to him: 'If of a heathen would they be permitted?'—He replied: 'A heathen is usually prepared to [dispose of his grapes and] accept payment, whereas an Israelite is generally not prepared to [do so and] accept payment.' See Exh. 270

The above text [stated], 'Samuel said: The law of the State is law.' Said Raba: You can prove this from the fact that the authorities fell palm-trees [without the consent of the owners] and construct bridges [with them] and we nevertheless make use of them by passing over them. But Abaye said to him: This is so perhaps because the proprietors have meanwhile abandoned their right in them. He, however, said to him: If the rulings of the State had not the force of law, why should the proprietors abandon their right? Still, as the officers do not fully carry out the instructions of the ruler, since the ruler orders them to go and fell the trees from each valley [in equal proportion], and they come and fell them from one particular valley, [why then do we make use of the bridges which are thus constructed from misappropriated timber?]—The agent

⁽¹⁾ This clause is altogether missing in Aliasi and Asheri. (2) As to the number of the barrels. (3) Of the pieces. (4) According to the reading of MS. M. (5) Especially since the branches were outside the vineyard and thus probably overhanging a public road; cf. B.B. II, 14. (6) For if the rulings of the State were not binding by religious law, it would have been a sin to make use of the bridges constructed in such a way. (7) Cf. supra p. 382. (8) In accordance with the interpretation of Tosaf. a.l.; v. also supra 148; but according to Rashi read 'What effect could there be even if . . . 'so long as no change in possession followed. (6) Lit. 'King'

SANHEDRIN

Exhibit 42

TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH

WITH NOTES, GLOSSARY

CHAPTERS 1-VI

ВΥ

JACOB SHACHTER

CHAPIER V.

ВΥ

H. FREEDMAN, B.A., Ph.D.

IN T W O V O L U M E S

LONDON THE SONCINO PRESS 1935

INTRODUCTION

Exhibit 43

The word Sanhedrin in the tractate which bears its name has a specialised meaning somewhat remote from that of its Greek original overloia. It designates the higher courts of law which in the latter part of the period of the Second Temple administered justice in Palestine according to the Mosaic law in the more serious criminal, and especially capital cases. The main subject of our tractate is the composition, powers, and functions of these courts. Incidentally, as is only natural, it deals in some detail with the conduct of criminal cases; and in this way it forms, along with Makkoth, the chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud. X Note This

When the Mishnah was compiled, towards the end of the second century C.E., the Sanhedrin was already a thing of the more or less distant past. As an institution it does not seem to have survived the destruction of the Second Temple; it may even have been falling into decay for some time before that event. Consequently, the information about it given in the Talmud, in this and other tractates, has neither the fulness nor the precision that we could desire. Both Josephus and the New Testament contain references to what is called the "Synhedrion" of the Jewish people, which it is not easy to reconcile with what we are told about any of the Sanhedrin mentioned in the Talmud.

From this tractate itself we learn that there were two kinds of Sanhedrin—the Great Sanhedrin, with 71 members, and the Lesser, with 23. Both, according to tradition, were instituted by Moses, but the first date at which a Sanhedrin is mentioned as actually functioning is 57 B.C.E. In the Talmud the Sanhedrin is almost always spoken of as a purely judicial institution, and the name seems in fact to be interchangeable with Beth Din Haggadol—the great Court of Justice. The Great Sanhedrin met in the Lishkath Hagazith [Chamber of Hewn Stone] in the Temple at Jerusalem; the Lesser Sanhedrin [there seem to have been several of them] met both in Jerusalem and at other places. The Lesser Sanhedrin was also competent to try capital cases, but the Great Sanhedrin was the su-

According to the Talmud, the two most distinguished members of the Great Sanhedrin were known as Nasi [Prince] and Ab-beth-din [Father of the Beth din], while there was a third known as Musta [distinguished]. The last named may have been a kind of expert adviser; the other two titles seem to have been purely honorary, and not to have denoted any official position. Certain it is that in Josephus and the New Testament it is the High Priest who is spoken of as the President of the Synhedrion, and this in itself seems inherently probable. Josephus and the New Testament also picture the Synhedrion as an institution of some political importance; whether this institution was identical with the Great Sanhedrin of the Talmud it is difficult to say.

In the eyes of Christian students, Sanhedrin has always occupied a favoured place among the tractates of the Talmud on account of the light which it is capable of throwing on the trial of Jesus of Nazareth. It is not without significance that when Reuchlin, the Christian champion of Jewish learning, searched Europe to find a copy of the Talmud, the only Treatise he could find was Sanhedrin. For the Jewish student also, in spite of the fact that its main theme was already at the time of its compilation one of academic interest only, it possesses a peculiar fascination, partly on account of the fundamental importance of the legal principles with which it deals, partly on account of the wide range of its digressions and the exceptionally high quality of its aggadic material. In particular, in view of their influence on the teaching of Maimonides, may be mentioned its famous statement on the limits of monarchic power.

⁽¹⁾ On this question v. Krauss, Introduction to Die Mischna Sanhedrin-Makkot, 1933; Büchler, Das Synedrion in Jerusalem und das grosse Beth Din in der Quaderhalle des jerusalemischen Tempels; and Taubsch. Z. הנשיא כסנהררין הגרולה.

SANHEDRIN Rentbit 45 206-216

Our Rabbis taught: Royal treasures' [must be given] to the king; but of all other spoil, half to the king and half to the people. Abaye said to R. Dimi or, according to others, to Rab Aha: We quite understand it is the natural thing to give royal treasures [wholly] to the king; but where do we learn that of all other spoil he is to receive half?—From the verse, [21a] And anointed him [Solomon] unto the Lord to be prince, and Zadok to be priest. Thus, the prince is compared with Zadok; just as in the case of Zadok [High Priest], half belonged to him, and half to his brethren, so also in the case of the ruler. And whence do we know it of Zadok himself?—As it has been taught, for Rabbi said: And it [the shewbread] shall be for Aaron and his sons; this means, half belonged to Aaron and half to his sons.

MISHNAH. Neither shall he multiply wives to himself. Only eighteen. R. Judah said: he may have more, provided they do not turn away his heart. R. simeon said: he must not marry even one who may turn away his heart. Why then is it written, neither shall he multiply wives to himself? — even though they be women like abigail. 6 (24 or 48 wives are advocated on next page based on the numerical value of the words in text? GEMARA. Are we to assume that R. Judah interprets Biblical law on the basis of its reason, 7 and R. Simeon does not? But we find the reverse; for it has been taught: A pledge must not be

(1) Taken in war. (2) I Chron. XXIX, 22. (3) Lev. XXIV, 9. (4) Deut. XVII, 17. (5) Ibid. From which it might be inferred that he may marry a lesser number even if they should corrupt him. (6) I.e., even of the most virtuous, only eighteen are permitted, and not a single one who misleads is permitted. Abigail was the wife of Nabal the Carmelite. (I Sam. XXV, 3.) She is regarded in the Aggadah as one of the most remarkable women in Jewish history. V. Meg. 15s. (7) Lit., 'he searches out the reason of the verse'. (8) Therefore, notwithstanding the explicit statement that the king must not multiply wives, R. Judah permits it, where the feared consequences will not follow; whilst R. Simeon have to the letter of the law.

How do they [the judges] know?!—Abaye said: Two Rabbis are sent with him: if his statement has substance, he is [brought back]: if not, he is not [brought back]. But why not do so in the first place?!—Because being terrified, he cannot say all he wishes.)

Jesus Stoned

MISHNAH. IF THEN THEY FIND HIM INNOCENT, THEY DISCHARGE HIM, BUT IF NOT, HE GOES FORTH TO BE STONED.

AND A HERALD PRECEDES HIM [CRYING]: SO AND SO, THE SON OF SO AND SO, IS GOING FORTH TO BE STONED BECAUSE HE COMMITTED SUCH AND SUCH AN OFFENCE, AND SO AND SO ARE HIS WITNESSES. WHOEVER KNOWS ANYTHING IN HIS

FAVOUR, LET HIM COME AND STATE IT.

and hung up, or crucified, as a blash hener GEMARA. Abaye said: It must also be announced: On such and such a day, at such and such and hour, and in such and such a place [the crime was committed], in case there are some who know [to the contrary], so that they can come forward and prove the witnesses Zomemim. 4 Exn. 75

AND A HERALD PRECEDES HIM etc. This implies, only immediately before [the execution], but not previous thereto. [In contradiction to this] it was taught: On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, 'He is going forth to be stoned because he has practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy. Any one who can say anything in his favour, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.' But since nothing was brought forward in his favour he was hanged on the eve of the Passover! Y' Ulla retorted: Do you suppose that he was one for whom a defence

⁽¹⁾ Whether his statement has substance. (2) l.e., as soon as he starts out for the place of execution, so as to avoid an unnecessary return even the first time.

⁽³⁾ Therefore the first two times he receives the benefit of the doubt. (4) V. Glos. (5) E.g., not forty days before. The two passages that follow have been expunged in all censored editions. [As to the historical value to be attached to them, v. Klausner, Jesus. p. 27ff.] (6) [Ms. M. adds 'the Nazarcan'.] (7) [A Florentine Ms. adds: and the eve of Sabbath.]

could be made? Was he not a Mesith [enticer], concerning whom Scripture says, Neither shalt then spare, neither shalt then conceal him? With Yeshu however it was different, for he was connected with the government [or royalty, i.e., influential].

[43b] R. Joshua b. Levi said: He who sacrifices 9 his [evil] inclination and 9 confesses [his sin] over it, 9 Scripture imputes it to him_as though he had honoured the Holy Que, blessed be He, in

(1) Deut. XIII, 9 (2) Ps. XI.II, 3. (3) Hold. XI.I, 6. (4) Ex. XXIII, 7. (5) Naki is employed here as subject. (6) Ps. X, 8. (7) Isa, XI. 1. (8) Hold. XIV, 19 (9) Ex. IV, 22 (10) Hold. IV, 23. (11) Ps. C. 1. (12) Hold. I., 23. [We can only regard this tencing with texts as a jeu d'esprit occasioned no doubt by some actual event', Herford, op. cit. p. 93. Cf. also Klausner, op. cit. p. 28II.] (13) I.e., resists, or conquers. (14) After having been induced to sin. (15) [Cf. e.g. Lev. XVI, 24, Ms. M. onuts 'over it'.]

see Exh. 274 Jesus Stoned

GEMARA. [45a] Our Rabbis taught: One part of a man was covered, [viz...] in front and two parts of a woman, [viz...] in front and behind, because she is wholly shameful [when naked]: this is R. Judah's opinion. The Sages said: A man is stoned naked, but not a woman, What is the Rabbis' reason?—Scripturestat es. And they shall stone otho [him]. Why state 'otho'?' Shall we say, 'otho' but not 'othah' [her]? but it is written, Then shall thou bring forth that man or that woman! What then is the significance of 'otho'?—That only he is stoned] without his garments, but she is stoned in her clothes.

R. Judah said: 'Otho' implies without clothes, and there is no

the other, and vice versa. An explanation of the happening was given by the Rabbi in a dream to one of his pupils who was disturbed at the occurrence, and he also informed him that severe punishment lay in store for Simeon b. Shetah in the world to come for the neglect of his duty in tolerating eighty women in Ashkelon guilty of sorcery. Simeon, on being informed about it, took a serious view of the matter and had them executed. The relatives of these women, however, inflamed with a passion for revenge, plotted against his son, charging him with a capital crime, as a result of which he was sentenced to death. On his way to the place of execution the condemned man protested his innocence so vehemently that even the witnesses were moved to admit the falsity of their evidence, giving as ground for their former act their feelings of enmity against Simeon b. Shetah. Yet their latter statement was not accepted, according to the law expounded in the text, that a witness is not to be believed when he withdraws a former statement. The source for Rashi's story is found in J. Sanh. VI, 1; 6, and in J. Hag. II, 2, with slight variations.

(1) In order to hasten his death and lessen the pain (Maim.). The Talmud, however, bases it on Scripture. (2) In a separate pronoun, instead of using the pronominal suffix. (3) Deut. XVII, 5, with reference to idolatry which is punishable by stoning. (4) I.e., a man. (5) I.e., a woman. (6) Who requires only partial covering of a woman.

distinction of sex. Are we to assume that the Rabbis are apprehensive of unchaste thoughts, and that R. Judah is not? But we know in fact that they both hold the reverse, for we learnt. The Priest seizes her garments at does not matter if they are rent or torn open, until he uncovers her bosom and unloosens her hair. R. Judah said: If her bosom was beautiful, he did not expose it, and if her hair was comely, he did not loosen it. A Rabbah said: In the other case, this was the reason: lest she should come forth from the Beth din innocent and the young priests conceive a passion for her; but here, she is about to be executed! And should you object, But through her their passions might be inflamed for others, Rabbah said: We have it on tradition that evil inclination moves a man only towards what his eyes see.

Raba said: Is there only an inconsistency between R. Judah's two statements and not between those of the Rabbis? — But, said Raba, R. Judah's two statements are not contradictory, even as we have solved the difficulty. And the Rabbis' views are also not opposed: Scripture says, That all women may be warned and not to do after your lewdness: 6 but here, no greater warning is possible than this [sc. the execution]. 7 And should you say, Let us wreak both upon her, behold R. Nahman said in Rabbah b. Abbahu's name: Scripture says, Love thy neighbour as thyself: 9 choose an easy death for him. 10 123310 n for stoned woman

⁽¹⁾ Since 'Otho' serves for one exclusion, that of clothes—it cannot serve as excluding women from that requirement, v. supra 43a. (2) Sotah 8a. (3) In connection with the procedure for a woman suspected of infidelity (sotah). Cf. Num-V, 11ff. (4) Hence it is R. Judah and not the Rabbis who are apprehensive that the sight of her may incite to unchaste thought. (5) For Rabbah's distinction only reconciled R. Judah's two views, but left the difficulty of the Rabbis' views untouched. (6) Ezek. XXIII, 48. The procedure with the Sotah therefore was only instituted as a deterrent. (7) Hence there is no need to add humiliation. (8) Humiliation and stoning. (9) Lev. XIX, 18. (10) One entailing as little humiliation as possible. (11) R. Judah and the Sages, inasmuch as the former, by requiring only partial covering of the woman and so enhancing her humiliation, does not seem to be of that opinion.

SANHEDRIN Exhibit 50 454

stoning

MISHNAH. The place of stoning was twice a man's height.) One of the witnesses pushed him by the hips, so that he was overturned on his heart, he was then turned on his back. If that caused his death, he had pulpilied [his duty]; but if not, the second witness took the stoned and threw it on his chest, if he died thereby, he? had done [his duty]; but if not, he the criminal was stoned by all israel, for it is written: the hand of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. It

GEMARA. A Tanna taught: And with his own height,¹² there were three [men's heights] in all. Yet do we really require so much height?¹³ For the following contradicts it: 'Just as a pit to be reckoned as causing death must be ten handbreadths [deep].¹⁴ so must all other [excavations] be sufficient to cause death, viz., ten

(1) I.e., the Sages. (2) Lit., 'bodily ease'. Though being clothed delays death and increases pain, yet the humiliation of nakedness is harder to bear. (3) I.e., six cubits, the normal height of man to the shoulders being three cubits. X(4) To see whether the drop brought his death forthwith. [So Abraham de Boton on Maim. Yad., Sanh. XV, 1. Rashi explains: Because it is degrading (for the dead) to lie on the face, v. Tosaf. Yom. Tob. The rendering could accordingly be: One of the witnesses pushed him down on the hips. If (however) he overturned (i.e., fell) on his heart, he was turned on his back, v. Hoffmann.] (5) I.e., the witness, the obligation of execution lying primarily upon him. (6) According to the Naples ed. he himself takes etc. and only if that failed to cause death did the second witness take part. (7) The' stone, because it was prepared beforehand. This was a very heavy stone, which it required two men to lift. (8) Lit., 'placed'. (9) Sc., the second witness. //(10) I.e., all the bystanders. (11) Deut. XVII. 7. (12) He was pushed down from a standing position. (13) To cause, instart death. (14) Cf. M. B.K. 50b.

MISHNAH. How is he hanged?—The post is sunk into the ground with a [cross-]piece branching oppose the top]. And he; brings his hands together one over theother and hangs him up [thereby]. R. jose said: the post is leaned against the wall, 5 and he hangs him up after the fashion of butchers. He is immediately afterwards let down. If he is left [hanging] over night, a negative command is thereby transgressed, for it is written, his body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt surely bury him the same day for he is hanged [because of] a curse against god, 6—as if to say why was he hanged?—Because he cursed the name [of god]; and so the name of heaven [god] is profaned. R. meir said: 9 when man suppers, 10 what expression does the she chinah! use?—my head is too heavy for

R. MEIR SAID: 9 WHEN MAN SUPPERS, 10 WHAT EXPRESSION

DOES THE SHECHINAH 11 USE? — MY HEAD IS TOO HEAVY FOR

ME; MY ARM IS TOO HEAVY FOR ME. 12 AND IF GOD IS SO GRIEVED

OVER THE BLOOD OF THE WICKED THAT IS SHED, HOW MUCH

ore so over the blood of the righteous! Exh. 276

(1) After being stoned. (2) This bears no resemblance at all to crucifixion. Ct. Rabbinowicz, Ligislation criminelle du Talmud, p. 111: What a difference between this hanging after death, where the executed man had both his hands tied and did not remain one minute upon the gallows, and the Supplicium, which the Romans inflicted upon Jesus, who was nailed to the cross whilst alive, with his hands on the cross, and left hanging on the gallows all day. (3) The first witness, Krauss, loc. cit. (4) [1700, Me'iri reads 1200.] (5) And net fixed into the ground. (6) Deut. XXI, 23. 1717 http://dx.nib.p. is interpreted by the Mishnah as an objective genitive—'a curse against God'. (7) If his body be left hanging a considerable time, thus reminding men of his blasphemy. (8) Man's sin reflecting, in a manner of speaking, on God. (9) In interpretation of the words 1717 http://dx.nib.p. (10) In consequence of sin, as those are who are executed in this instance. (11) The word 1717 is omitted in most editions of the Mishnah. Where it is omitted, the definite article is added to the word 1717, and the phrase is translated, 'When man suffers, what does the tongue say?' [The tongue stands for the Divine, and some texts accordingly add here, 'If it could be said', 1912.] (12) V. Gemara. The phrase is intended to express how painful it is to God when His children suffer, even though they may deserve pusishment for their insquities, as a father would deplote the pain of his sinful son.'

524

THAT IS THE MANNER OF STONING.

To what does this refer?3—To the statement [in a preceding Mishnah]: When the verdict [of guilty] was finally announced, he [the accused] was led out to be stoned . . . 4 Now, the scaffolding [for stoning] was twice a man's height etc. 5 And because the Tanna is about to teach the manner of death by fire, he sums up the foregoing with the words: THAT IS THE MANNER OF STONING etc.

Jesus Burned sec Ein. 161, 274

MISHNAH. THE MANNER IN WHICH BURNING IS EXECUTED IS AS FOLLOWS; HE WHO HAD BEEN THUS CONDEMNED WAS LOWERED INTO DUNG UP TO HIS ARMPITS; THEN A HARD CLOTH WAS PLACED WITHIN A SOFT ONE, 6 WOUND ROUND HIS NECK, AND THE TWO LOOSE ENDS PULLED IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS, FORCING HIM TO OPEN HIS MOUTH. A WICK WAS THEN LIT, AND THROWN INTO HIS MOUTH, SO THAT IT DESCENDED INTO HIS BODY AND BURNT HIS BOWELS. R. JUDAH SAID: SHOULD HE HOWEVER HAVE DIED AT THEIR HANDS [BEING STRANGLED BY THE BANDAGE BEFORE THE WICK WAS THROWN INTO HIS MOUTH, OR BEFORE IT COULD ACT], HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN EXECUTED BY FIRE AS PRESCRIBED. HENCE IT WAS DONE THUS: HIS MOUTH WAS FORCED OPEN WITH PINCERS AGAINST HIS WISH, THE WICK LIT AND THROWN INTO HIS MOUTH, SO THAT IT DESCENDED INTO HIS BODY AND

⁽¹⁾ In the sense of not holy. (2) That the father is cursed and reviled for his offspring's misdemeanours. (3) [This is Rashi's reading, found also in MS.M.; cur. edd.: What does he teach that he states?] (4) Supra 42b. (5) Supra 45a. (6) The soft one alone could not exert sufficient pressure to open his mouth; whilst a hard one alone would bruise the skin and unnecessarily disfigure him (Rashi).

[The verse]. So shalt thou put away the guilt of the innocent blood from among you, 'serves to denote that all that shed blood are likened [in treatment] to the atoning heifer: 'just as there, it is done with a sword and at the neck, so here too, execution is with the sword and at the neck [i.e., the throat]. If so, just as there it was done with an axe, and on the nape of the neck, so here too?—R. Nahman answered in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: Scripture saith: But then shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: 's choose an easy death for him.

GEMARA. Our Rabbis taught: [And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death]. The man' excludes a minor; 'that committeth adultery with another man's wife' excludes the wife of a minor; 'even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife' excludes the wife of a heathen; 'shall surely be put to death', by strangulation. You say, by strangulation; but perhaps one of the other deaths decreed by the Torah is meant here?—I will answer you: Whenever the Torah decrees an unspecified death penalty, you may not interpret it stringently but leniently:5 this is R. Josiah's view. R. Jonathan said: Not because strangulation is the most lenient death, but because by every unspecified death in the Torah strangulation is meant. Rabbi [proceeding to demonstrate this] said: Death by God is mentioned in Scripture; and death by man is also

⁽¹⁾ Deut. XXI, 9. (2) Lit., 'the heifer, the neck of which is broken.' (3) Lev. XIX, 18. (4) Ibid. XX, 10. (5) Lit., 'attract it to stringency etc'. Hence strangulation, the easiest of deaths, must be meant. (6) E.g., God's slaying of Onan, Gen. XXXVIII, 10.

SANHEDRINExhibit 54 541-554

treated as an old one. What is meant by this?—Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that. What is the basis of their dispute?—Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty [in that respect]. But Samuel maintains: Scripture writes, [And thou shalt not lie with mankind] as with the lyings of a memon. 4

R. Nahman, son of R. Hisda stated in an exposition: In the case of a woman, there are two modes of intimacy, but in the case of a

(1) The reference is to the passive subject of sodomy. As stated supra 548, guilt is incurred by the active participant even if the former be a minor, i.e., less than thirteen years old. Now, however, it is stated that within this age a distinction is drawn (2) I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum. (3) At nine years a male attains sexual matureness. (4) Lev. XVIII, 22. Thus the point of comparison is the sexual matureness of woman, which is reached at the age of three. (5) [Rashi reads 12] instead of the 12] in our printed texts. A male, aged nine years and a day who commits etc.] There are thus three distinct clauses in this Baraitha. The first—a male aged nine years and a day—refers to the passive subject of pederasty, the punishment being incurred by the adult offender. This must be its meaning: because firstly, the active offender is never explicitly designated as a male, it being understood, just as the Bible states, Thou shelt not lie with mankind, where only the sex of the passive participant is mentioned; and secondly, if the age reference is to the active party, the guilt being incurred by the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at least nine years and a day? Hence the Baraitha supports Rab's contention that nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner for the adult to be liable.

Even as R. Hamnuna propounded: What if a Jew committed bestiality in ignorance; must there have been both a stumbling block and degradation [for the animal to be stoned] and in this case there is only degradation, but no sin; or perhaps for degradation alone without there having been a stumbling block [the animal is stoned]? 1—R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; [if a niddah] she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with gonorrhoea]. If she married a priest, she may eat of terumah; If any unfit person has a connection with her, he disqualifies her from the priesthood. If any of the forbidden degrees had intercourse with her, they are executed on her account, but she is exempt. Now, 'any of the forbidden degrees' implies even a beast: in this case, there is degradation but no stumbling-block, yet it is taught that they [including a beast] are slain on her

(1) According to the latter explanation of the Mishnah, this problem is solved whilst the first remains unanswered; but according to the first explanation, the first problem is solved, but not the second. As we cannot be certain which is correct, both so far are unsolved. (2) A man who had sexual connection with a niddah, defiles that upon which he lies, even if he does not actually touch it. But the degree of uncleanliness it thereby acquires is not the same as that of bedding upon which a niddah herself, or a person afflicted with gonorrhoea, lies. For in the latter case, the defilement is so great that the bedding in turn renders any person or utensil with which it comes into contact unclean; whilst in the former, it can only defile foodstuffs and liquids. This is the same degree of uncleanliness possessed by a garment which has lain upon, or been borne by a zab (i.e., one afflicted with issue). (3) As the law of an Israelite's (adult) daughter who married a priest. But if she was less than three years old, although the Kiddushin accepted on her behalf by her father is valid, yet since she is sexually immature, the marriage cannot be consummated, and hence she is not thereby enabled to eat of terumah. On terumah, the priest's portion of an Israelite's produce. v. Glos.

(5) I.e., if a priest's daughter, or if the daughter of a Levite or Israelite married to a priest, she may not eat of terumah. (6) If they are of those forbidden on the daughter, the marriage cannot be consummated for the priest's daughter of a Levite or Israelite married to a priest, she may not eat of terumah. (6) If they are of those forbidden on the daughter of a Levite or Israelite married to a priest, she may not eat of terumah. (6) If they are of those forbidden on the daughter of a Levite or Israelite married the daughter of daughter.

rance. ¹ No! The second reason is one of stumbling-block and degra dation; but the first teaches that even if there is a stumbling-block without degradation, the animal is stoned, ¹ e.g., if a heathen committed bestiality, even as it was asked of R. Shesheth. ²

Jesus "blasphemer"

MISHNAH. The blasphemer is punished only if he utters [the divine] name. Ir. Joshua B. Karha said: [564] the whole day [of the trial] the witnesses are examined by means of a substitute for the divine name, thus, may jose smite jose. When the trial was finished, the accused was not executed on this evidence, but all persons were removed [from court], and the chief witness was told, 'state literally what you heard' thereupon he did so, [using the divine name]. The judges then arose and rent their garments, which rent was not to be resewn. The second witness stated; 'I too have heard thus' [but not uttering the divine name], and the third says: 'I too heard thus'.

GEMARA. It has been taught: [The blasphemer is not punished] unless he 'blesses' the Name, by the Name(3) Whence do we know this?—Samuel said: The Writ sayeth, And he that

(1) Which solves the problem propounded by R. Hamnunah. (2) V. p. 373, supra. (3) I.e., the Tetragrammaton. (4) The witnesses, in giving testimony, do not state that they heard the accused say, 'May He slay himself', uttering the actual divine name, but use the word 'Jose' as a substitute for the divine name. 'Jose' is chosen as a substitute, because it contains four letters, like the actual Tetragrammaton, which must have been used by the blasphemer for him to be punished. Moreover, the numerical value of 'Jose' is the same as of Elohim (81). According to Levy, s.v. '1272, the first Jose 'Dr stands for Jesus (1267, son), and the second is an abbreviation of 1279, Joseph, the Father, by which, however, God was to be understood. The witnesses were accordingly asked whether the accused in his blasphemy had set Jesus above God. (R. Joshua b. Karha, the author of this saying, lived at a time when Judeo-Christians ascribed more power to Jesus than to God.) (5) As in the Mishnah, 'Jose strike Jose'. 'Bless' is here a euphemism for curse, and is so in the whole of the ensuing discussion.

violation is not punished by death! -R. Nahman b. Isaac answered. Their prohibition is their death sentence.

has been taught: A Cuthean and a [Jewish] shepherd of small cattle [sheep, goats, etc.] need neither be rescued [from a pit] nor may they be thrown [therein]!

'And similar acts.' To what can this apply in the case of robbery?

—R. Aha b. Jacob answered: To a worker in a vineyard [who eats of the grapes]. When so? If his is the finishing work, it is permitted? If it is not the finishing work, is it not actual robbery? 4—But R. Papa said: This applies to [the theft of] an article worth less than a perujah. 5 But if so, why say that such robbery of a Jew by a Cuthean must not be kept: does he not forgive him? 6—Though he later forgives him, he is grieved when it occurs [therefore it is prohibited]. But how can you say that such robbery by one Cuthean from another is but a 'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since a Cuthean does not forgive, 7 is it not actual theft? —But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika answered: It applies to the withholding of a labourer's wage. 8 One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted. 9 To what can 'a similar act' apply in the case of a beautiful woman?

robbino wages of non-Jew

(1) Both are regarded as robbers, the latter because they permit their charges to graze in other people's fields. (2) One need neither exert oneself to save them from death, nor may one encompass it. This, of course, is theoretical only, v. p. 388, n. 6. Not a few of these harsh utterances (where they do not reflect the old Semetic tribal law, v. p. 388, n. 7) were the natural result of Jewish persecution by the Romans, and must be understood in that light. In actual practice, these dicta were certainly never acted upon, and it is significant that a commission of Roman officers, after investigating Jewish law in its relation to Gentiles, took exception only to two laws, one relating to the damage done by a goring ox, and the other permitting a Jew the use of property stolen from a Gentile. R. Gamaliel repealed this latter law. (B.K. 38a: Sifre Deut. 344.) Hence, reverting to the discussion, the Tanna could not have stated that the murder of a Cuthean by a Jew is permissible; therefore he is forced to speak of punishment. (3) E.g., the gathering in of the grapes. Deut. XXIII, 25 is interpreted by the Rabbis as referring to work in connection with the finishing touch given to the produce. (4) Not merely bordering thereon. (5) A small coin, one-eighth of the Roman as. (6) One does not mind such a trifle, and readily forgives it. (7) Even such a trifle, v. infra 59a. (8) This only borders on a robbery, for actual robbery means depriving a person of what

free again [to others]?—R. Huna said: From the time that she goes bareheaded in the streets.

R. Eleazar said in R. Hanina's name: If a heathen had an unnatural connection with his wife, he incurs guilt; for it is written, and he shall cleave, which excludes unnatural intercourse. Raba objected: Is there anything for which a Jew is not punishable and a heathen is? But Raba said thus: A heathen who violates his neighbour's wife unnaturally is free from punishment. Why so?—[Scripture saith:] To his wife, but nor to his neighbour's; and he shall cleave, which excludes unnatural intercourse. 4

R. Hanina said: If a heathen smites a Jew, he is worthy of death, for it is written, And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian. R. Hanina also said: He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, One who smiteth? man [i.e. an Israelite] attacketh the Holy One. 9*

(Mnemonic: lists, his servant, Sabbath.) Resh Lakish said: He who lists his hand against his neighbour, even if he did not smite him, is called a wicked man, as it is written. And he said unto the wicked man, Wherefore wouldst thou smite thy fellow? Wherefore hast thou smitten' is not said, but wherefore wouldst thou smite, shewing that though he had not smitten him yet, he was termed a wicked man. Ze'iri said in R. Hanina's name: He is called a sinner, for it is

(1) Even non-Jewish married women did not walk bareheaded in the streets, and this bondwoman, though not legally married, would do likewise. If she appeared bareheaded, it was a sign that her connection with the slave to whom she had been allotted was now broken. (2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction 'to his wife but not to his neighbour's wife is incurred only for natural, but not unnatural intercourse. X(5) [By the Hand of God, v. Yad, Melakim, I, 6].

(6) Ex. II, 12. Thus Moses slew the Egyptian for striking an Israelite, proving that he had merited it. (7) Deriving mokesh from nakosh. (8) Yala' 22, is here derived from los' 210 the jaw: lit., 'smiteth the jaw'. (9) Prov. XX, 25. (10) V. p. 387 n. 8. (11) Ex. II, 13.

594 Orollan SANHEDRIN Exhibit 60
a positive one, yet it is reckoned?—It is both positive and negative.

R. Johanan said: A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death, for it is written, Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs. Then why is this not included in the Noachian laws?—On the reading morasha [an inheritance] he steals it; on the reading me'orasah [betrothed], he is guilty as one who violates a betrothed maiden, who is stoned. An objection is raised: R. Meir used to say, Whence do we know that even a heathen who studies the Torah is as a High Priest? From the verse, [Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments:] which, if man do, he shall live in them. Priests, Levites, and Israelites are not mentioned, but men: hence thou mayest learn that even a heathen who studies the Torah is as a High Priest!—That refers to their own seven laws?

'R Hanania b. Gamaliel said: [They were also commanded] not to partake of the blood drawn from a living animal.'

Our Rabbis taught: But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat, 8 this prohibits flesh cut from the living animal. R. Hanania b. Gamaliel said: It also prohibits blood drawn from a living animal. What is his reason?—He reads the verse

(1) Positive: to dispense justice; negative: to refrain from injustice. But the Sabbath is entirely positive. (2) Deut. XXXIII, 4. (3) This seems a very strong expression. In the J. E. (loc. cit.) it is suggested that R. Johanan feared the knowledge of Gentiles in matters of Jurisprudence, as they would use it against the Jews in their opponents' courts. In support of this it may be observed that the Talmud places R. Johanan's dictum (which. of course, is not to be taken literally) immediately after the passage dealing with the setting up of law courts by Gentiles. It is also possible that R. Johanan's objection was to the studying of Oral Law by Jewish Christians, as the possession of the Oral Law was held to be the distinguishing mark of the Jews. It is significant that it was R. Johanan who also said that God's covenant with Israel was only for the sake of the Oral Law. (Cf. Ex. Rab. 47.) (4) In Pes. 495 two opinions on the reading of this verse are recorded. One view is that it should be read, Moses commended us a law for an inheritance (morashs Tayno), in accordance with the Scriptural text. Another version is, Moses commended us a law for a betrothal (reading me orasah Tayno) i.e., as something betrothed, consecrated to us, from Tayno i.e., as something betrothed, consecrated to us, from Tayno i.e., as something betrothed, consecrated to us, from Tayno in that of adultery. (5) Lev. XVIII, 5. (6) Which includes observing. (7) It is meritorious for them to study these; but not laws which do not pertain to them. (8) Gen. IX, 4.

MISHNAH. [60b] HE WHO ENGAGES IN IDOL-WORSHIP [IS EXECUTED]. IT IS ALL ONE WHETHER HE SERVE IT, SACRIFICE, OFFER INCENSE, MAKE LIBATIONS, PROSTRATE HIMSELP, ACCEPT IT AS A GOD, OR SAY TO IT, THOU ART MY GOD. BUT HE WHO EMBRACES, KISSES IT, SWEEPS OR SPRINKLES THE GROUND BEFORE IT, WASHES IT, ANOINTS IT, CLOTHES IT, OR PUTS ON ITS SHOES, HE TRANSGRESSES A NEGATIVE PRECEPT [BUT IS NOT EXECUTED]. HE WHO VOWS OR SWEARS [LIT. CONFIRMS A THING] BY ITS NAME, VIOLATES A NEGATIVE PRECEPT. HE WHO UNCOVERS HIMSELF BEFORE BAAL-PEOR [IS GUILTY, FOR] THIS IS THE MODE OF WORSHIPPING HIM. HE WHO CASTS A STONE ON MERCULIST THEREBY WORSHIPS IT.

BEAMARA. What is meant by WHETHER HE SERVE IT?!—

R. Jeremiah said: This is what is meant: Whether he serve it in its normal way, or sacrifice, make libations, offer incense, or prostrate himself, even if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if the serve if these acts are not the normal m de of worther the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve if the serve

The difficulty arises, if two witnesses are sufficient, surely three are: then why state it? R. Akiba answers, To teach that just as in the case of two, if one is proved invalid, the whole testimony loses its validity (since only one witness is left), so also, even if there are three or more, and one was proved invalid, the testimony of all is valueless, though there are still two or more valid witnesses left. Now, when the Mishnah states that the third also must testify 'I too heard thus', it is in conformity with R. Akiba's ruling, so that should he be contradicted as having been absent, the entire testimony is null. Otherwise, it would be unnecessary for the third witness to be examined at all

mode of worship) are not wholly imaginative and do not take their colouring from the rites of some heathen or antinomian-Gnostic sects is shewn by the fact that the worship of Peor is ridiculed, but nowhere stigmatised as moral depravity, by the Rabbis, which latter might have been expected, had the assertion of the Rabbis been based on the Gnostic cults mentioned.' J. E. s.v. Baal-Peor. (2) Mercurius, a Roman divinity, identified with the Greek Hermes; also a statue or a way-mark dedicated to Hermes, the patron deity of the wayfarer. (3) Are not all the actions mentioned modes of worship?

the people which are round about you, night unto thee or far from thee. In Now, what does it matter whether they are far or near?—But the Writt means this: from the character of the near idols you can learn the nature of the distant ones. If Surely then it means that the seducer had said to the seduced: It eats thus, it drinks thus, it does so much good and so much harm.' This proof is conclusive.

(Mnemonic: 'ebed yishtahaveh lemoshiah Abaye said, how do I know it? Because we have learnt, HE WHO ENGAGES IN IDOL WORSHIP, IT IS ALL ONE WHETHER HE SERVE THEET. Surely it means: whether he serve it through love or fear, [or whether he sacrifice to it as a god]. But Raba answers

(1) Ibid. 8. (2) A seducer generally seeks to entice one to worship distant idols by describing their great power, but avoids mention of the near ones, which his victims would themselves know to be powerless; therefore Scripture warns one against such enticement, by pointing out that the near (and known) idols are an object lesson for the distant ones. Scripture thus assumes that such blandishments were used. (3) Therefore his mere assertion is sufficient to condemn him, as it is certain that he will keep it. But an observant Israelite may reconsider his desire. (4) The first Mishnah states that the death penalty is imposed for engaging in idol worship; the second adds that this is so not only for actually worshipping idols but also for the mere statement of intention. Both Mishnahs will then refer to the same kind of Jew. (5) has not not not make a notice. The servant shall bow down to the anointed one. Three passages are adduced, whose catchwords are respectively Service, Prostration, The Anomaled One. S. Funk (Die Juden in Pubylonien, p. 94, n. 2) sees in this mnemonic an allusion to the Christians' acceptance of Jesus, 'the servant' being the title claimed by those who worship him as the Messiah. (6) For, as in supra 600 the difficulty arises, what is meant by 'whether he serve it', seeing that all other actions mentioned are forms of service. Abaye therefore proposes this solution.

you: That is not so, but as R. Jeremiah resolved the difficulty.

Abaye [further] said, Whence do I know it? For it has been taught: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them: thou mayest not bow down to them, but thou mayest bow down to a human being like thyself. I might think that this applies even to one who is worshipped, like Haman; but the Writ adds, nor serve them. But Haman was thus served through fear (Raba, however, explains it thus: like Haman, but not altogether so. [To bow down to one] 'like Haman' [is forbidden], since he set himself up as a divinity: but not altogether so,' for Haman was worshipped through fear, whilst the prohibition of this verse applies only to a voluntary action.

Rab Judah said in Rab's name: And the men of Babylon made Succoth-benoth: What is this?—A fowl. And the men of Cuth made Nergal: What is it?—A cock. And the men of Hamath made Ashima: What is that?—A bald buck. And the Avites made Nibhaz and Tartak: What are these?—A dog and an ass. And the Sepharvites burnt their children in fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech, the gods of Sepharvaim: What are these?—The mule and the horse: Adrammelech meaning that it [the mule] honours its master? [lit., 'king'] with its load; Anammellech meaning that the horse responds to its master in battle. The father of Hezekiah King of Judah wished to do likewise to him [i.e., burn him in fire], but that his mother anointed him [with the blood of the] salamander.

Rab Judah said in Rab's name: The Israelites knew that the idols were nonentities, but they engaged in idolatry only that they might openly satisfy their incestuous lusts. R. Mesharshia objected: As those who remember their children, so they longed for their altars, and their graves by the green trees etc; 11 which R. Eleazar interpreted: As one who yearns for his son [so they yearned]? 12—That was after they became addicted thereto. 13 Come and hear: And I will cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols. 14 It was related of Elijah the Righteous, that whilst searching for those who were languishing with hunger in Jerusalem, he once found a child faint with hunger lying upon a dungheap. On questioning him as to the family to which he belonged, he replied, 'I belong to such and such a family.'

burning children to demons

(1) Il Kings XVII, 30. This and the following verses refer to the idols set up by the heathens with whom Sannecherib repopulated Samaria after its inhabitants were deported. (2) They worshipped the image of a fowl, called in their language Succoth-henoth. (3) Ibid. (4) Ibid. (5) Ibid. 3. [Our printed Talmud texts read Nibhan. 113 = 'to bark' (instead of Nibhaz), hence taken to be a dog.] (6) Ibid. (7) Adar, Heb. hadar 1111 = 'to honour', and melech (melek) = king, master. (8) [I.e., the mule honours its master by carrying his load.] (9) 'Ana, Heb. 113 = 'to respond.' (10) A reptile believed to be engendered in fire. One who smeared himself with its blood was thought to be fire-proof. Hag. 27a. (11) Jer. XVII, 2. (12) This shows that they really believed in idols. (13) I.e., at first, it was only a pretext to satisfy their lust. But having engaged in idolatry, they were ensnared by its allurements and really believed in it. (14) Lev. XXVI, 30.

thereof. Then they said, 'Since the time is propitious, let us pray that the Tempter of Sin [may likewise be delivered into our hands].' So they prayed, and it was delivered into their hands. They imprisoned it for three days; after that they sought a new laid egg for an invalid in the whole of Palestine and could not find one. Then they said, 'What shall we do? Shall we pray that his power be but partially destroyed? Heaven will not grant it.' So they blinded it with rouge. This was so far effective that one does not lust for his forbidden relations.

Rab Judah said in Rab's name: A gentile woman once fell sick. She vowed, 'If I recover, I will go and serve every idol in the world.' She recovered, and proceeded to serve all idols. On reaching Peor, she asked its priests, 'How is this worshipped'? They replied, 'People eat beets, drink strong drink, and then uncover themselves before it.' She replied, 'I would rather fall sick again than serve an idol in such a manner.' But ye, O House of Israel, 4 were not so, [as it is written, Slay ye every, one his men) that were joined unto Baal Peor: 5 ye were attached to it like an air-tight lid. 6 Whereas, Whilst ye that did cleave unto the Lord your God, 7 implies merely like two dates sticking to each other. 8 In a Baraitha it has been taught: that were joined unto Baal Peor: [loosely] like a bracelet on the hands of a woman; 9 whereas Whilst ye that did cleave unto the Lord your God indicates that they were firmly attached. 10

Our Rabbis taught: Sabta, a townsman of Avlas, 11 once hired an ass to a gentile woman. When she came to Peor, she said to him, 'Wait till I enter and come out again.' On her issuing, he said to her, 'Now do you wait for me too until I go in and come out again.'

⁽¹⁾ Zech. V. 8. (2) Through the imprisonment of the Tempter sexual lust was dormant throughout creation. (3) Lig., 'half and half'. That it may arouse only legitimate sexual desire. (4) This is Rab's comment. (5) Num. XXV, 5. (6) This connects the Heb. "This hanizmadim, who cleaved, with zamid, now, an exactly fitting lid. (7) Deut. IV, 4. (8) "Para, par, dabak, used in this verse, does not imply so strong an attachment as zamad; thus they clung more fervently to Peor than to the Lord. (9) Deriving hanizmadim from zamid, a bracelet. (10) This reverses Rab's interpretation. (11) In Cilicia, mentioned as one of the northern border places of the Landsof Israel; Targum Jerus. Num. XXIV. 8: Targum Jonathan b. Uzziel a. l. (last.).

'But,' said she, 'are you not a Jew?' He replied, 'What does it concern thee?' He then entered, uncovered himself before it, and wiped himself on the idol's nose, whilst the acolytes praised him, saying, 'No man has ever served this idol thus.'

R. Manassch was going to Be Toratha. On the way he was told, 'An idol stands here.' He took up a stone and threw it at the idol's statue. Thereupon they said to him: 'It is Merculis'. He said to them, 'But we have learned, HE WHO CASTS A STONE FOR MERCULIS' THEREBY SERVES IT.' So he went and inquired at the Beth Hamidrash [whether he had done wrong, since his action was a gesture of contempt]. They informed him, We have learned, HE WHO CASTS A STONE AT MERCULIS! [thereby serves it]—that is to say even if it is merely to bruise it. He said to them, 'Then I will go and remove it.' But they replied, 'Whether one casts a stone or removes it, he incurs guilt, because every stone thus removed leaves room for another.'

Burning children To demon

MISHNAH. He who gives of his seed to molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to molech but did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does both.

(1) A town in Babylonia, on the road to Pumbaditha, 'A.Z. 26a. It may perhaps be identified with Bithra, on the south of the royal canal, on the Seleucian road (A. Neubauer, Geographie du Talmud, p. 363). (2) בירקולים i.e., as act of worship. (3) [He was told that the reading in the Mishnah is אונה בירקולים (A. Merculis, implying even as a gesture of contempt.] (4) On 53a. (5) As two separate offences, proving that giving one's seed to Molech is not idolatry.

view that Molech worship is not idolatry. For it has been taught, [if one causes his seed to pass through the fire,] whether to Molech or to any other idol, he is liable [to death]. R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon said: If to Molech, he is liable; if to another idol, he is not.

Abaye said: R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon and R. Hanina b. Antigonus said the one and same thing. R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon that which has just been stated. R. Hanina b. Antigonus—as it has been taught: R. Hanina b. Antigonus said: Why did the Torah employ the word Molech? To teach that the same law applies to whatever they proclaimed as their king, even a pebble or a splinter. Rabina said: The difference between them is in respect of a temporary Molech.

[64b] R. Jannai said: Punishment is not incurred unless one delivers his seed to the acolytes of Molech for it is said; And thou shalt not give of thy seed to pass through the fire to Molech. It has been taught likewise: I might think, that if one caused his seed to pass through the fire to Molech, without first delivering it to the priests, he is liable: therefore the Writ teaches, Thou shalt not give. If he gave it to the priests, but did not cause it to pass through the fire, I might think that he is liable: therefore the Writ states, to pass through. If one delivered it [to the priests of Molech], but caused it to pass through to some other deity. I might think that he is punished: therefore the Writ teaches, to Molech, Now, if he delivered it to the priests and caused it to pass to Molech, but not through the fire, I might think that he is liable:

The differences is, that if one sacrificed to Molech, or caused his son to pass through the fire to some other deity, he is not punished.

⁽¹⁾ Molech is connected with the idea of kingship. This shews that he too regards any fetish as a Molech. (2) In his view they did not say the one and the same thing. (3) I.e., anything which was only temporarily worshipped as Molech, such as a pebble, which would obviously not he a permanent idol.] According to R. Hanina b. Antigonus, he is executed even then. But Rr Eleazar son of R. Simeon holds that the law applies only to a permanent idol worshipped as Molech. (4) He explains this to be the meaning of the Mishnah unless he gives it to molech. (5) Lev. XVIII, 21. This proves that the offence consists of two parts; (1) formal delivery to the priests, and (ii) causing the seed to pass through the fire.

but, as here is written, to pass through; and elsewhere it is stated. There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire: just as there, the reference is to fire, so here too; and just as here the reference is to Molech, so there too.

R. Aha the son of Raba said: If one caused all his seed to pass through [the fire] to Molech, he is exempt from punishment, because it is written, of thy seed implying, but not all thy seed. To permit the for bidden

R. Ashi propounded: What if one caused his blind or sleeping son to pass through, 3 or if he caused his grandson by his son or daughter to pass through?—One at least of these you may solve. For it has been taught: [Any men... that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall be put to death... And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people;] because he hath given of his seed unto Molech. 4 Why is this stated? 5—Because it is said, there shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire. 6 From this I know it only of his son or daughter. Whence to I know that it applies to his son's son or daughter's son too? From the verse, [And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man] when he giveth of his seed unto Molech [and kill him not: Then I will ... cut him off.]?

Now the Tanna commences with the verse, 'because he hath given of his seed', but concludes with 'when he giveth of his seed'?—This is to intimate another deduction. 8 Thus: [because he hath given] of his seed: From this I know only that the law applies to legitimate seed [that being the normal meaning of the word]; whence do I know

(1) Deut. XVIII, 10. (2) Probably because this would not be accounted a normal mode of Molech worship; cp. pp. 438, 440 (3) Is 'thou shalt not cause to pass' applicable only to a son who can naturally pass through himself, but not to a blind or sleeping son, who must be led or carried, or does it apply to all? (4) Lev. XX, 2f. (5) Since the passage commences by explicitly referring to this offence, why is it repeated? (6) Deut. XVIII, 10. (7) Lev. XX, 4. Hence the law applies also to grandsons (8) I.e., from the first verse, because etc. we learn that the law applies to one's grandsons too; when he giveth is stated in order that another law may be deduced.

that one's own loss has priority over that of any other man?'There the deduction follows from 'save that'.'

R. Jose, son of R. Hanina said: Why is extinction thrice threatened for idolatry? —One teaches extinction for the normal worship of idols; one for abnormal; and one for the service of Molech But on the view that Molech worship is included in general idolatry, why is extinction mentioned in its case? —To apply to one who causes his son to pass through to an idol [not Molech], where such is not the normal mode of worship. Now, on the view that a megaddef? is a worshipper of idols,? why is extinction stated for it? —Even as it has been taught: That soul shall surely be cut off from among his people; he shall be cut off in this world and in the next: this is R. Akiba's view.? R. Ishmael said: But the verse has previously stated 'that soul shall be cut off': 10 are there then three worlds? 11 But [interpret thus:] 'and [that soul] shall be cut off'—in this world: 'he is to be cut off'—[of the following verse, and denoted by

⁽¹⁾ The questioner understood this to be deduced from 'among thee'—in thyself. Since this is not taught in the name of any particular Tanna, it should agree with the Rabbis too. (2) Heb. PBN efes, implying an admonition to avoid any action which may lead to poverty. Naturally, this is not to be interpreted as permitting dishonesty, but merely insists that poverty must not be courted. (3) Twice in Lev. XX, 2-5: Whosoever be he... that giveth of his seed to Molech... I will cut him off from among his people. And if the people of the land... kill him not. Then I will set my face against that man... and will cut him off. Once in Num. XV, 30f. But the soul that doeth aught presumptuously... the same reproacheth the Lord; and that soul shall be cut off from among his people. Because he hath despised the word of the Lord. This refers to idolatry.

(4) Which is not included in general idolatry. as stated above. (5) In Num. XV, 30, the Heb. for 'he reproacheth' is megaddef. (6) The meaning of megaddef is disputed in Ker. 7b. By a 'worshipper of idols' is meant, e.g., one who sings hymns in a heathen Temple. (7) Since, being a normal part of idolatry, it is understood. (8) Num. XV, 31. Continuing the verses quoted in note 3. In the Heb. as usual, this emphasis is denoted by the repetition of the verb, Papa Papa (9) He interprets the doubling of the verb as referring to two worlds. (10) Ibid. 30. (11) Rashi explains that this question is not put to R. Akiba, because he interprets megaddef in that previous verse as referring to blasphemy, not idolatry. But this question is rhetorically stated by R. Ishmael on his own assumption that megaddef means an idol worshipper.

burns incense as a charm. Abaye said to him: But burning incense as a charm is to act as a charmer, which is merely prohibited by a negative precept?—That is so, but the Torah decreed that such a charmer is stoned. Demon in vocation ckay

Now, as for R. Johanan, why does he maintain that in the view of the Rabbis the bending of one's body [in prostration] is an action, whilst the movement of the lips is not?—Raba said; Blasphemy is different, since the offence lies in the intention. [65b] R. Zera objected: False witnesses are excluded [from the necessity of a sin offering if they unwittingly offended], since their offence entails no action. But why so; their offence does not depend on intention?—Raba answered: False witnesses are different, because their offence is caused by sound. But does not R. Johanan regard sound as a [concrete] action? Has it not been stated: If one frightened [lit. 'muzzled'] off an animal by his voice, or drove animals by his voice, 9 R. Johanan ruled that he is liable to punishment.

(1) To exorcise the demons (Jast.). Rashi reverses the interpretation: to call up the demons, that they may assist him in his sorcery. This is not idolatry, for the demons are not thereby worshipped as divinities, but it comes under the heading of Ba'al'ob. (2) Consequently, for unwitting transgression a sin offering is due. But the charmer who is punished by lashes is one who charms animals by bringing them together. (3) Deut. XVIII, 10/. (4) Large objects, viz., cattle, and beasts; small objects, creeping things, insects, etc. (5) For blasphemy is an indictable offence only if it is mentally directed against God. If however, one reviles the Divine Name, whilst mentally employing it to denote some other object, he is not punished. Consequently, since the essence of the offence is mental, the slight action is disregarded. (6) Lit., witnesses proved zomemim, v. Glos. (7) Ker. 4a. (8) Causing certain sounds, i.e., words, to be heard at Beth din. Since sound too is not concrete, false testimony is comparable to blasphemy, and the essence of the transgression lies in intention. (9) The first refers to Deut. XXV, 4: Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn; the second to Deut. XXVI, 10. Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn;

Our Rabbis taught: A Ba'al ob is one who speaks from between the joints of his body and his elbow joints. A yidde'oni is one who places the bone of a yidoa'3 in his mouth and it speaks of itself. An objection is raised: And thy voice shall be, as of one that hath a familiar spirit, out of the ground: 4 surely that means that it speaks naturally? —No. It ascends and seats itself between his joints and speaks. Come and hear: And the woman said unto Saul, I saw a god-like form ascending out of the earth: [And Samuel said to Saul...] surely that means that it spoke naturally?—No. It settled itself between her joints and spoke.

Our Rabbis taught: Ba'al ob denotes both him who conjures up the dead by means of soothsaying? and one who consults a skull. What is the difference between them?—The dead conjured up by soothsaying does not ascend naturally [but feet first], nor on the Sabbath; whilst if consulted by its skull it ascends naturally and on the Sabbath too. [You say,] it ascends: but whither—does not the skull lie before him?—But say thus: It answers naturally, and on the Sabbath too. And this question was asked by Turnusrufus? of R. Akiba: 'Wherein does this day [the Sabbath] differ from any other?'—He replied: Wherein does one man differ from another?' —Because my Lord [the Emperor] wishes it.''The Sabbath too,' R. Akiba rejoined, 'then, is distinguished because the Lord wishes so.' He replied: 'I ask this: Who tells you that this day is the Sabbath?'—He answered: 'Let the river Sabbation'

⁽¹⁾ Hence we see that R. Johanan considers voice an action? (2) I.e., they offend by saying that they saw something; and sight does not entail work or ction. (3) Rashi, the name of a beast: Maim., the name of a bird. (4) Isa. XXIX. 4. (5) I.e., the dead actually speaking out of the ground. (6) I Sam. XXVIII, 13. (7) [1707, from Syriac 707, 'to divine'. Rashi connects it with 1707, 'membrum'.] (8) I.e., not from between the necromancer's joints. (9) Tineius Rufus, a Roman Governor of Judaea. (10) 'Why is one a noble and one a commoner?'—referring to the high office which Rufus held. (11) A legendary river, said to flow with such a strong current on week days, carrying

He who enquireth of an ob-is that not the same as one that consulteth the dead? —As has been taught: Or that consulteth the dead? —As has been taught: Or that consulteth the dead: this means one who starves himself and spends the night in a cemetery, so that an unclean spirit [of a demon] may rest upon him [to enable him to foretell the future]. And when R. Akiba reached this verse, he wept: If one who starves himself that an unclean spirit may rest upon him has his wish granted, he who fasts that the pure spirit [the Divine Presence] may rest upon him—how much more should his desire be fulfilled! But alas! 4 our sins have driven it away from us, as it is written, But your iniquities have separated between you and your God. 6

Raba said: If the righteous desired it, they could by living a life of absolute purity be creators, for it is written, But your iniquities have distinguished between etc. 7 Rabbah created a man, 8 and sent him to R. Zera. R. Zera spoke to him, but received no answer. Thereupon he said unto him: 'Thou art a creature of the magicians. Return to thy dust.' bower of creation

R. Hanina and R. Oshaia spent every Sabbath eve in studying the 'Book of Creation', by means of which they created a thirdgrown calf 10 (for note 10 see p. 447) and ate it.

along stones and rubble with tremendous force, as to be quite unnavigable, but resting on the Sabbath. [Cf. Plinius, Hist. Nat. XXI, 2, and Josephus, Wars, VII, 5, § 1].

(1) Who cannot conjure up the dead on that day. (2) The whole week smoke ascended from his grave, as he was being burnt in the fires of purgatory: but even the wicked in Gehenna have rest from their torments on the Sabbath. (3) Deut. XVIII, 11. (4) Lit., 'What am I to do'. (5) Lit., 'have brought (this) upon us'. (6) Isa. LIX, 2. (7) Ibid. Raba understands mabadilim in the sense of 'draw a distinction'. But for their iniquities, their power would equal God's, and they could create a world. (8) By means of the Sefer Yezirah, Book of Creation, V. next note. (9) The Book of Creation, Heb. Sefer Yezirah, is the title of two esoteric books. The older, referred to here, was a thaumaturgical work popular in the Talmudic period. It was also known as Hilkoth Yezirah (Laws of Creation), and is so called in the same story quoted on 67b. Rashi there states that the creation was performed by means of mystic combinations

Our Rabbis taught: Me'onen!—R. Simeon said: 1 hat is one who applies the semen of seven male species to his eyes in order to perform witchcraft. The Sages say: It is one who holds people's eyes. R. Akiba said: It is one who calculates the times and hours, saying, To-day is propitious for setting forth; to morrow for making purchases; the wheat ripening on the eve of the seventh year is generally sound; let the beans be pulled up [instead of being harvested in the usual manner] to save them from becoming wormy.

Our Rabbis taught: A Menahesh is one who says: So and so's bread has fallen out of his hand; his staff has fallen out of his hand; his son called after him; a raven screamed after him, a deer has crossed his path; a serpent came at his right hand or a fox at his left; 5 [66a] do not commence with me; 6 it is morning; it is new

moon; it is the conclusion of the Sabbath.7

of the Divine Name, which does not come under the ban of witchcraft. Its basic idea is that the Creation was accomplished by means of the power inherent in these letters (Cf. Rab's saying: Bezalel knew how to combine the letters by which heaven and earth were created'. Ber. 55a. Cf. also Enoch LXI, 3 et seq.; Prayer of Manasseh; Ecc. R. III, 11 on the magic power of the letters of the Divine Name), and that this same power could be utilised in further creation. The work was ascribed to Abraham, which fact indicates an old tradition, and the possible antiquity of the book itself. It has affinities with Babylonian, Egyptian, and Hellenic mysticism and its origin has been placed in the second century B.C.E., when such a combination of influences might be expected. It is noteworthy that Raba's statement above, though not mentioning the Sefer Yezirah, insists on freedom from sin as a pre-requisite of creation by man, v. J.E., XII, 602. (10) [l.e., a calf that has reached one third of its full growth; others interpret: (i) in its third year; (ii) third born, fat]. Den Ving Doner Of God

(1) Observer of times, Deuf. XVIII, 10. (2) Producing hallucinations in people by opening and shutting their eyes (Rashi). (3) Time was calculated by seven-year cycles. The seventh year was called the year of release, and the land was not to be ploughed or sown therein. Lev. XXV, 1-7. (4) An enchanter, Deut. XVIII, 10. (5) All these omens were regarded by the superstitious as generally bad. (6) I.e., if a tax-collector comes to him, he asks him to collect first from someone clse, as it is a bad omen to be the first to pay taxes. (7) He declines to pay his debts on these occasions, regarding it as a bad omen to start the week or day or month by paying debts.—All these superstitions are forbidden

under the term menahesh.

X Our Rabbis taught: Ye shall not use enchantments nor observe times. This refers to those who practise enchantment by means of weasels, birds, and fish. Prohibiting what no one wants to do and allowing evil practices for bidden by Bible MISHNAH. He who desecrates the sabbath [is stoned], providing that it is an offence punished by extinction if deliberate, and by a sin-offering if unwitting.

GEMARA. This proves that there is a manner of desecrating the Sabbath for the deliberate committal of which there is no extinction, nor is a sin offering to be brought for its unwitting transgression. What is it?—The law of boundaries, according to R. Akiba, and kindling a fire, according to R. Jose.

Cursing parents

MISHNAH. One who curses his father or his mother is not punished unless he curses them by the divine name. If he cursed them by an attribute or. Meir held him liable, but the sages ruled that he is exempt.

Sabbath distance

(1) Lev. XIX, 26. (2) Var. lac.: 'and stars'. (3) According to Biblical law, as deduced by the Rabbis, one was not to go more than 12 mil (a mil = 1,000 cubits) beyond the town boundaries on the Sabbath (the Rabbis reduced this to 2,000 cubits). R. Akiba maintained that if this law was violated the offender was liable neither to extinction nor to a sin offering. (4) V. supra 62a. (5) E.g., The Merciful, the Gracious, the Almighty. (6) This anonymous term did not necessarily represent the view of many Sages; it frequently connoted a single scholar. (7) Lev. XXIV, 16. (8) Since the beginning of the same verse explicitly states that the reference is to the Name: And he that blasphemeth the Name of the Lord shall surely be put to death.

MISHNAH. A MADDIAH IS ONE WHO SAYS, 'LET US GO AND SERVE IDOLS'. A SORCERER, IF HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS MAGIC, IS LIABLE [TO DEATH], BUT NOT IF HE MERELY CREATES ILLUSIONS. R. AKIBA SAID IN R. JOSHUA'S NAME: OF TWO WHO GATHER CUCUMBERS [BY MAGIC] ONE MAY BE PUNISHED AND THE OTHER EXEMPT: HE WHO REALLY GATHERS THEM IS PUNISHED; WHILST HE WHO PRODUCES AN ILLUSION IS EXEMPT.

Jesus a "Sorceror" and "Idolator" GEMARA. Rab Judah said in Rab's name: This Mishnah teaches of those who lead astray a seduced city.²

A SORCERER, IF HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS MAGIC etc.

Our Rabbis taught: [Thou shalt not suffer] a witch [to live]: I this applies to both man and woman. If so, why is a [female] witch stated?—Because mostly women engage in witchcraft. How are they executed?—R. Jose the Galilean said: Here it is written, Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live; whilst elsewhere is written, Thou shalt not suffer anything that breatheth to live. I Just as there, the sword is meant, so here is the sword meant too. R. Akiba said: It is here stated, Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live; whilst elsewhere it is said, [There shall not a hand touch it, but he shall surely be stoned, or shot

the name, he connects it with מצמס מברס 'seditious', and suggests (p. 345 n. 1) that it originally denoted 'that Egyptian' (Acts XXI 38; Josephus, Ant. XX, 8, 6) who claimed to be a prophet and led his followers to the Mount of Olives, where he was routed by the Procurator Felix, and that in later times he might have been confused with Jeshua ha-Notzri. This hypothesis, however, involves the disregard of the Talmudic data, for Pappos b. Judah lived a century after Jesus (Git. 900), though the mother's name, Miriam (Mary), would raise no difficulty, as מול מול מול מול מול מול מול מול מול מול

(1) I.e., the illusion of doing something, whereas in fact he does nothing.
(2) Cf. supra 53a. (3) Ex. XXII, 17. (4) Deut. XX, 17. This refers to the war of extermination against the seven races inhabiting Canaan before the Conquest by Joshua. They would naturally be killed by the sword.

out for the same purpose illumine the proposition as a whole.

R. Johanan said: Why are they [sorcerers] called Kashshafim?

There is null else besides Him: 4 R. Ḥanina said: Even by sorcery. 5 A woman once attempted to take earth from under R. Ḥanina's feet. 6 He said to her, 'If you succeed in your attempts, go and practise it [sc. sorcery]: it is written, however, There is null else beside him'. But that is not so, for did not R. Johanan say: Why are they called mekashshefim? 7 Because they lessen the power of the Divine agencies?—R. Ḥanina was in a different category, owing to his abundant merit. 8 (de mon older y)

R. Aibu b. Nagri said in the name of R. Hiyya b. Abba: Belatehem refers to magic through the agency of demons; belahatehem to sorcery [without outside help]. 9 And thus it is also said, And the flame [Heb. lahat] of the sword that turns of itself. 10

Abaye said: The sorcerer who insists on exact paraphernalia " works through demons; he who does not works by pure enchantment.

(1) R. Judah does not agree with the limitation expressed above, and it is precisely from this verse that he deduces that even two statements may be singled out to convey a teaching for the whole; v. Kid. 35a. (2) ***[2] (1) I.e., making incantations of death against those for whom Heaven has decreed life (Rashi); and in general seeking to interfere with the course of events as decreed from above. The word is treated as an abbreviation, thus KeshafiM, Kahash, Famalia, Ma'alah. (Lessens [the] Family on High). (4) Deut. IV. 35. (5) I.e., not even sorcerers have power to oppose His decree. (6) To perform magic against him. (7) **D**D**D**D** Hebrew form of Kashshafim. (8) Therefore God would certainly not permit any sorcerer to harm him. (9) In the references to Pharoah's magicians, two words are employed to denote their art: belatchem, (DTIDD**D) e.g., Ex. VII, 22 (with their enchantments); and belahatehem (DTIDD**D) e.g., Ex. VII, 11. (10) Gen. III, 24, thus lahat is referred to an action taking place of itself; similarly, belahatehem connotes sorcery performed without extraneous aid. (11) Demanding particular properties for different kinds of magic.

R. Oshaia, who spent every Sabbath eve in studying the Laws of Creation, by means of which they created a third-grown calf

R. Ashi said: I saw Karna's father blow his nose violently and streamers of silk issued from his nostrils.

Rab said to R. Hiyya: 'I myself saw an Arabian traveller take a sword and cut up a camel; then he rang a bell, at which the camel arose.' He replied, 'After that, was there any blood or dung? But that was merely an illusion.'

Ze'iri happened to go to Alexandria in Egypt and bought an ass. When he was about to water it, it dissolved, and there stood before him a landing board. The vendors then said to him; 'Were you not Ze'iri, we would not return you [your money]: does anyone buy anything here without first testing it by water?' 5

(1) V. p. 446, nn. 9, 10. It thus all depends as to whose help is invoked in performing the miraculous. (2) He was a magician. (3) Ex. VIII, 19; this refers to the plague of lice, which they could not imitate. (4) The ass had been a product of sorcery created out of a landing board. Things thus created reverted to their original form when brought into contact with water. (5) The scholars of the first century referred frequently to Egypt as the original home of magic arts (Blau, Das alijüdische Zauberwesen, pp. 37–49). Sorcery was very rife in Alexandria, and was actised by Jews too, who were more influenced by pagan ideas in this city than in any other place of their dispersion. Among the less intelligent, Jewish and pagan, witcheraft were freely indulged in (Schürer, Geschichte, 3rd ed., III, 294-304). It is not clear in this passage whether Ze'iri had bought the ass from a Jew or Gentile, but the fact that such particular respect was shewn to him would seem to indicate that the vendor was a Jew. (6) Rashi observes that this is the reading, not R. Jannai; for a scholar would not practise witcheraft.

water.' and they offered him shattitha.' Seeing the lips of the woman [who brought him this] moving. he [covertly] spilled a little thereof, which turned to snakes. Then he said, 'As I have drunk of yours, now do you come and drink of mine.' So he gave her to drink, and she was turned into an ass. He then rode upon her into the market. But her friend came and broke the charm [changing her back into a human being], and so he was seen riding upon a woman in public.

And the frog came up, and covered the land of Egypt. R. Eleazar said: It was one frog, which bred prolifically and filled the land. This is a matter disputed by Tannaim. R. Akiba said: There was one frog which filled the whole of Egypt [by breeding]. But R. Eleazar b. Azariah said to him, 'Akiba, What hast thou to do with Haggadah? Cease thy words and devote thyself to 'Leprosies' and 'Tents.' One frog croaked for the others, and they came'.

R. AKIBA SAID, etc. demonism

[68a] But did R. Akiba learn this from R. Joshua? Surely it has been taught: When R. Eliezer fell sick, R. Akiba and his companions went to visit him. He was seated in his canopied four-poster, whilst they sat in his salon. That day was Sabbath eve, and his son Hyrcanus went in to him to remove his phylacteries. But his father rebuked him, and he retreated crestfallen. It seems to me, said he to them, that my father's mind is deranged. But R. Akiba said to them, 'His mind is clear, but his mother's [sc. of Hyrcanus] is deranged: how can one neglect a prohibition which is punished by death, and turn his attention to something which is merely forbidden as a shebuth? To The Sages, seeing that his mind

^\$1, ال A drink prepared of flour and water. Cf. Lat. prisanarium, a decoction of barlex, cond the pressed of flour and water. Cf. Lat. prisanarium, a decoction of barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, barlex, prisker, ba

with a woman that is a bondmaid]. 'A man': from this I know the law only with respect to a man: whence do I know it of one aged nine years and a day who is capable of intercourse? From the verse, And 'if a man'? He replied: Such a minor can produce semen, but cannot beget therewith; for it is like the seed of cereals less than a third grown Y A minor may K177

The School of Hezekiah taught: But if a man came presumptuously [yazid] upon his neighbour to slay him with guile: 4 a man can inflame [his genital] and emit semen, but not a minor [7] R. Mordechai asked of R. Ashi: Whence do we know that mezid denotes heating?

—From the verse, And Jacob sod [wa-yazed] vottage, 6

the majority! This was reported back to Rabina. He replied: Do we then not follow the majority in capital charges? But we learnt: If one witness testified that the crime was committed on the second day of the month, and one on the third, their testimony is valid; for one knew that the past month had been full, and the other did not. But if you maintain that we do not follow the majority, should we not say that these witnesses testify exactly, and thus contradict each other? Hence it surely must be that we follow the majority who are wont to err with respect to the fulness of the month.

[Mishnah] refers to a husband who explicitly accepted her under all conditions. Lewd mother 18" pure"

Our Rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son [a minor], and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her,—Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her unfit to the priesthood Beth Hillel declare her fit. R. Hiyya the son of Rabbah b. Nahmani said in R. Hisda's name; others state, R. Hisda said in Ze'iri's name: All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not: their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old, Beth Shammai maintaining, We must base our ruling on the earlier generations, but; Beth Hillel hold that we do not.

Now, whence do we know that in the earlier generations [a Joy of eight years] could beget children? Shallwesay since it is written. [i] [And David sent and inquired after the woman, And one said:] Is not this Bath Sheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite? And it is written, [ii] Eliam, the son of Ahitophel the Gilonite; and it is written, [iii] And he sent by the hand of Nathan the prophet; and he called his name Jedidiah [afterwards Solomon] because of the Lord; and it is written, [iv] And it came to pass, after two full years [after Solomon's birth], that Absalom had sheepshearers; and it is written, [v] So Absalom fled and went to Geshur and was there three years; and it is written [vi] So Absalom dwelt two full years in Jerusalem, and saw not the king's face; and it is written, [vii] And it came to pass after forty years, that Absalom said unto the king, I pray thee, let me go and pay my vow, which I have vowed unto the Lord in Hebron; and it is written, [viii] And when Ahitophel saw that his counsel was not followed, he saddled his ass, and arose, and got him home to his house, to his city and put his household in order, and hanged himself; if and it is written, [ix] Bloody

1) I.e., she becomes a harlot, whom a priest may not marry (Lev. XXI, 7).

(2) So that if he was nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is invalidated from the priesthood; whilst if he was less that eight, Beth Shammai agree that she is not. -(3) When a boy of that age could cause conception.

(4) Il Sam. XI, 3. /5) Ibid. XXIII, 34. (6) Ibid. XII, 25. (7) Ibid. XIII, 23.

(8) Ibid. 18. (9) Ioid. XIV, 28. (10) Ibid. XV. 7. (11) Ibid. XVII. 23.

Shall we say that the following supports him? [For it was taught:] If she [sc. a betrothed maiden] sinned [by committing adultery], and then attained puberty [becoming a bogereth], she is strangled. Now, why not stoned? Surely, because since she is changed [physiologically], she is likewise changed [in respect of

brotality relished

[young] daughter to an old man. R. Akiba said: This refers to the delay in marrying off a daughter who is already a bogcreth.

R. Kahana said on R. Akiba's authority: The only poor in Israel is the subtly wicked and he who delays in marrying off his daughter, a bogereth. But is not one who thus delays himself subtly wicked? —Abaye answered: [76b] This is its meaning: Which poor man is subtly wicked? He who delays marrying off his daughter, a bogereth.

R. Kahana also said on R. Akiba's authority: Beware of one who counsels thee for his own benefit.

Rab Judah said in Rab's name. One who marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son, or returns a lost article to a Cuthean, 6—concerning him Scripture sayeth, [that he bless himself in his heart saying, I shall have peace, though I walk in the imagination of mine heart] to add drunkedness to thirst: The Lord will not spare him?

An objection was raised: He who loves his wife as himself and honours her more than himself, 8 and leads his children in the right path, and marries them just before they attain puberty—of him Scripture saith. And thou shalt know that thy tabernacle shall be in peace and thou shalt visit thy habitation, and shalt not sin.9—If just before puberty, it is different.

Our Rabbis taught: He who loves his neighbour, displays

(1) Having attained puberty, the may become unchaste if not married. Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now. (2) This is explained further on. (3) Why 'and he who delays etc.: the two are identical. His wickedness consists in that he keeps her unmarried, that he may profit by her labour whilst endangering her chastity. (4) Through his poverty he delays her marriage, that he may profit from her labour, The poor man has no other opportunity of cunning wickedness (5) Lit., 'in his own way' (6) V. p. 388, nn. 5-6. (7) Deut. XXIX, 18ff. i.e., the associations involved in these practices are displeasing in the eyes of the Lord. [How bitter must have been the persecution of the Jews under Ardeshir (v. Funk, op. cit 1, pp 66 ff.) to have provoked gentle Rab to this harsh utterance. (8) By providing her with fine ornaments (Rashi). (9) Job. V. 24. This proves that it is meritorious to marry off one's children whilst minors.

in a place where he must die]; [77a] then with respect to damages, wherein unwitting damage is treated as deliberate, and an accident as intention, surely he is liable for confining [the animal].

(1) It being a general principle that a man is liable for any damage he does, no matter how, B.K. 26b. (2) R. Aha b. Rab was a Babylonian amora of the fourth century, and the grandfather of R. Mesharshia. (3) Ibid. The first half of the verse extends the law to confining one's neighbour in a place of death, (p. 519). (4) I.e., he is liable only if the place was already exposed to heat or cold. But if it was merely destined to become hot, the sun not yet having risen, he is not liable. In the first case, he is regarded as a direct murderer, in the second, as an indirect cause. That is the general reason for the exemptions taught in this passage. (5) Because he could not have saved himself in any case. [Raba probably refers to a prisoner thrown into an arena to be torn by lions.) (6) I.e., the mosquitoes before which the prisoner was bound do not kill him entirely, as there is a continuous coming and going, Hence it is similar to binding one in a place where the sun will appear, but has not yet done so. (7) So that the cold entering therein, killed him. (8) This is similar: he did not kill him but indirectly caused his death.

shewn that R. Zera ruled that he is not liable. For R. Zera said: If one led his neighbour in to an alabaster chamber and lit a candle therein, so that he died [of the fumes], he is liable. Now, the reason is only that he lit a candle that he is liable; but had he not lit a candle [and the prisoner died of the natural heat and lack of air], he would be exempt! 1—I will tell you: In that case, without a candle, the heat would not have commenced [its effects] [77b] immediately [he placed him therein]; but in this case [of placing the upturned var over him] the heat commences immediately.

(Mnemonic: Ladder, shield, balsam, in a wall.) " Law '

Raba also said: If one shot an arrow at his neighbour, who had balsam in his hand [wherewith he could have healed the wound], but another dashed it out of his hand, or even if he himself [the thrower] did so, he is not liable, because when he did it he could have been healed. R. Ashi said: Therefore this holds good even if there was balsam in the market. 6 R. Aha the son of Raba asked R. Ashi: What if he came across the

⁽¹⁾ Which was then hermetically sealed, so that no fumes could escape. (2) This being considered active murder under the circumstances. (3) Thus R. Zera maintains that no penalty is incurred for indirectly causing one's death. (4) [By consuming the oxygen, the fire immediately produces effects of asphyxiation, but without fire such effects are not immediately felt.] (5) Lit., 'broken', as at the time it was released there was a shield to prevent its killing. (6) I.e., if when the arrow was thrown, a healing ointment could have been procured sufficiently quickly to prevent death, the attacker is not liable, even if for some reason the ointment became subsequently unavailable.

the side of the utensil, whence it fell into the trough, it is unfit?

—The reference here is to a dripping down.

Come and hear! If an [unclean] needle was lying upon a shard, and the [purifying] water was sprinkled thereon, but it is doubtful whether upon the needle or upon the shard, and then it spurted [miza] upon the needle, the sprinkling is invalid. I—R. Hinena b. R. Judah said in Rab's name: We have learnt, It was found [maza]. I How To Kill Explained

R. Papa said: If one bound his neighbour and then caused a column of water to inundate him, it is as his arrows, and he is liable [for his death]. But that is only if [he was drowned] by his direct agency; but if through his indirect agency he is merely regarded as a subsidiary cause.

R. Papa also said: If one threw a stone upwards, and it returned

(1) The reference is to the law of the red heifer: Num. XIX. The ashes thereof, when mixed with running water, are said to sanctify, the ashes themselves being denominated 'the sanctifier'. These had to be placed by a person into the water, not merely fall therein. Now, if one was engaged in sanctifying the water, and instead of pouring the ashes straight in, permitted them to fall upon his hand or on the side of a utensil, whence they fell into the trough containing the sanctified water, the water is unfit for its purpose, because the mixing had not been done directly by the person. This proves that a rebound is not regarded as a person's direct action, and thus contradicts the law of murder. (2) The ashes did not fall with force from the side of the utensil into the trough, but merely dripped down; therefore it is not regarded as man's direct agency. Had they fallen with force, however, the fall would be regarded as part of the man's action in dropping them on to the utensil, and the water would accordingly be fit. In the case of murder, the rebound is with force, and directly caused by the strength of the throw. (3) Because the sprinkling, as the mixing, must be done by man. Thus we see that the rebound is not regarded as direct action. (4) I.e., the text is corrupt, and instead of mize MY'D, maze MYD is to be read. Thus, the water was found upon the needle, but how it came there is not known, whether sprinkled direct thereon, or it had rebounded from the shard, which, on the present hypothesis, would also be valid, or flowed of itself from the shard on to the needle, in which case it was not due at all to man's action. (4) If the victim was lying immediately in front of the burst, where the strength of the water's flow is still due to the man's action, the drowning is by his direct agency. But if he was lying at some distance, he is held to be an indirect or secondary cause. (6) Not the actual murderer.

in a slanting direction and killed a man, he is liable. Mar son of R. Ashi asked R. Papa. Why so? Because it is by his agency! But if so, it should go upwards; [78a] whilst if it is not by his agency, it should fall [vertically] down? Dut it is through his agency, though weakened. 10" In nocent in men

Our Rabbis taught: If ten men smote a man with ten staves whether simultaneously or successively, and he died, they are exempt. R. Judah b. Bathyra said: If successively, the last is liable, because he struck the actual death blow. R. Johanan said: Both derive [their rulings] from the same verse, And he that killeth kol nefesh s [lit., 'all life'] of man shall surely be put to death. The Rabbis maintain that kol nefesh implies the whole life; but R. Judah b. Bathyra holds that kol nefesh implies, whatever there is of life.

Raba said: Both agree that if he killed a terefah he is exempt; if he slew one who was dying through an act of God, 10 he is liable; their dispute refers only to one who was dying through man's act: 11 the one likens him to a terefah, 12 the other to a person dying naturally. Now, he who likens him to a terefah, why does he not liken him to a person dying naturally?—Because no injury has been done to the latter; but an injury has been done to this one. Whilst he who likens him to a person dying naturally, why does he not liken him to a terefah?—A terefah has his vital organs affected!), but this one has not. 14 "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page of "Page

(1) For he had exerted himself to cause it tolgo up, not down. (2) Not in a slanting direction. (3) Le., most of the force with which he threw it was already expended, but sufficient was left to impel it in the direction in which it fell (4) Lit., 'brought his death near'; v. B.K. 26b. (5) ***9.2 **5.** (6) Lev. XXIV, 17. (7) Hence, if ten men assailed him successively, he was already nearly dead when the last smote him: therefore the last too is exempt. (8) I.e., however little life the man has, even if he is nearly dead, the man who actually kills him is liable. (9) V. Glos. When used of a person, it means that he was suffering from some fatal organic disease, recovery from which is impossible. (10) I.e., naturally, through age or weakness, but without an organic disease or wound. (11) As here: nine men had smitten him, and though not actually a terefals, he was already at the point of death. (12) Hence his slayer is exempt. (13) Lit., 'cut'. (14) Although suffering very much from the successive blows, and on the point of death, no vital organ, e.g., the heart or lungs, is injured, as in the case of a terefals.