I TESTIFY AGAINST THE JEWS

By Robert Edward Edmondson

Robert Edward Edmondon

I TESTIFY

AGAINST THE JEWS

By

Robert Edward Edmondson

Third Edition

Sons of Liberty

P.O. Box 214

Metairie, LA 70004

First Printing 1953 Second Printing 1954

PRO PATRIA

The Mighty Force that gave—
To Greece its Eternal Beauty and Imperishable Glory
To Rome its Imperial Power and Sublime Grandeur
To America its Immortal Constitution

Is not dead!

It still lives

To Save The Republic of Washington-Franklin-Lincoln.

At the inception of the patriotic crusade for Uncle Sam herein described, face to face with devastating horror—and the Road to the Right—these elemental questions posed themselves:

Since the "Men of '76" patriotically risked "their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor" for this Republic, can true citizens endowed with so royal a birthright do less in time of National Peril?

Should not every American on whom it bestowed surplus wealth, hold such in trust and devote it to needed defence when danger threatens the Republic?

The only answer to each question was an emphatic "Yes!"

DEDICATION

This book is humbly dedicated to-

Marian Louise Edmondson, who, defying dual terror, faithfully stood beside her husband—to die before her time February 22, 1952, a heart attack victim. I bear testimony that she justified her existence by word and deed.

To "The Twenty Immortals," that inspired band of fearless American lawyers, who, embattled in a courtroom of the Nation's capital in 1944, went far beyond the Call of Duty in behalf of The Constitution versus the New Deal might, and in defence of impoverished Innocence—AND WON! And received the deserved judicial high-honor tribute: "You have maintained the highest traditions of your profession."

And to that magnificently courageous company of "fire-tested" men and women communistically smeared by New Dealer dominated newspapers of the Nation as "Crackpots of the Lunatic Fringe;" who, sacrificially hazarding all they held dear, enemy-hounded from pillar to post, with high morale and indomitable spirit, gave back blow for blow—I take off my hat in reverential salute to rare individualistic valor.

With a veneration for Truth, a zeal for Principle and an unquenchable love for and loyalty to our immortal Constitution, I hereby hail them with congratulatory felicitations on the ineluctable fact that they alone in prophecy nearly two decades ago forecast, with incontestable accuracy, today's fulfilling exposures of direful socialistic subversions, which those heroic unsung militant Christian soldiers then envisioned and, cherishing no "passion for anonymity" (like their "invisible enemy") they patriotically broadcast signed warnings, to awaken unsuspecting countrymen to the imminence of the greatest danger ever menacing The Republic.

I would not be true to them nor to myself were I to fail, in the current crisis, to "stand up and be counted" publicly—For The Republic!

To Them All: HONOR! PEACE! HAPPINESS!

WHY "I TESTIFY"

"Inspection of the alleged libelous documents in this case will show the court that they are the result of mature study of the literature and press of the world. The defendant will have the right to occupy the time of the jury to read into the record a mass of material without end. There is no telling how many months trial might consume. It would develop racial and religious antagonisms that would rock the foundations of the community."

The foregoing court argument was made May 2, 1938, by Defence Counsel Wise for Robert Edward Edmondson following backdown dismissal pleas by five amicus curiae, whose leadership is credited with having instigated a communistic misleading sectarian indictment, a violation of state and national guarantees of freedom of the press, and which petitions were succeeded on May 10, 1938, by an unconditional formal dismissal of the case by N. Y. Judge Wallace.

With whatever authority he may have been equipped by more than half a century of specialization in the publicity fields of politico-economic and affiliated problems, this author, editor, lecturer and publisher has no hesitancy in emphatically stating if that New York group-libel case had progressed normally to a logical end the enormous cumulative explosive power generated would have smashed any news suppression-dam ever erected, and "rocked the foundations" of The Republic from coast to coast. The tremendous import of factual exposures of appalling high treason by the Roosevelt New Deal would have inescapably elevated righteous citizen-rage to transcendental heights, and boiling passions might well have produced civil commotion of great intensity, with ramifications to the National boundaries—and beyond.

The Fire of Truth widely broadcast then would have been later swept into a prairie conflagration through the confirming sequel in 1942-7 of the Roose-velt mass-case travesty on justice at Washington, D. C., dismissed in 1947, for the high news value of the first would have been revivified and expanded by the overt acts laid bare by the second persecution, as to the treacherous New Deal conspiracy with its perversion of tolerance.

Weak Legal Evidence Unmasked

The premature dismissals in both the New York and Washington plot-cases were due to early unmasking of the irrelevant and weak legal "evidence" presented by the Roosevelt prosecutions, defence counsel having been able to prove that there was no state law covering the absurd, intolerant and proven false N. Y. City prejudiced indictment. The Department of Justice not only failed to establish trial jurisdiction in the District of Columbia, but the defense so effectively cited U. S. Supreme Court precedent-decisions invalidating the prosecution that finally the prosecutor himself admitted he "had no case" in the Washington Communistic action.

RUSSIAN ANTI-SEMITISM PURGES

The 1952-3 puzzling spectacle of "Anti-Semitism" purges in Russia's "Semitic"-created Communist Government has revived and endowed with new life the collateral subject matter of the mass-documentation herein. That alone would have justified this presentation as a result-sequel of the American People's repudiation of the New Deal, Nov. 4, 1952, very closely related to "Anti-Semitism," calling for a public explanation of this multi-meaning mystery term, which is analyzed herein.

"President Eisenhower has appointed Lewis L. Strauss, a Special Assistant, to serve as liaison advisor on atomic energy matters."—Washington special to N. Y. Times, March 10, 1953.

Advice from such a source would be as unacceptable to this writer as would counsel from U. S. Ambassador Dillon to France. Both are prominent Jews. Strauss was not only a partner of the international banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., but served the Truman regime as a member of the Atomic Energy Commission. Dillon was head of the Wall St. banking firm of Dillon, Reed & Co.

Individuals referred to herein who appear to this reporter to be in un-American associations, are, so far as he knows, entirely true to their convictions; but HIS DUTY to The Republic and the Fourth Estate requires him to put his findings before the Bar of American Public Opinion for its enlightenment and action.

The writer has dared to hope that this up-to-date reproduction of vitally important and hitherto unpublished material will do the job of effectually educating his fellow countrymen as to the tremendous menace of a still operating "clear and present danger" to the existence of The Republic, which danger has merely been driven "underground" temporarily by the Anti-New Deal mandate of last November, and continues to invisibly carry on its plans for the destruction of national governments and religions.

And he sincerely believes that the aforesaid Anti-New Deal repudiation (Only Liberation Step No. 1) would have occurred many years prior to 1952 but for the inadvertent judicial suppression of the "real issue" testimony inherent in the evidence contained in the two dismissed Edmondson cases heretofore mentioned.

While publicity per se is obviously no treat for a news reporter veteran, being human he would naturally welcome the accolade of general public vindication denied by free speech suppression; but his chief reward and great happiness lie in the conviction that he has performed to the best of the ability with which he has been endowed, the worthwhile task of exposing Wrong to his blinded fellow-countrymen by holding high the Torch of Right without fear or favor, in a firm belief that faith without works is sterile, and that 'Pitiless Publicity is the Cure for Public Evils.'

AMERICAN BAR OF PUBLIC OPINION

Above all, the author felt it would be dereliction in high duty not to promptly distribute this invaluable legacy throughout The Republic—and beyond—considering the vital intra-national import of its exclusive, extensive and unique confessional-documentation, which he had been privileged to compile. Complimentary first copies of this book were therefore placed in "key quarters."

The author has elaborated The Real Issue in the formally filed Petition to Congress (made under oath) quoted herein and made a part hereof; for through only such a publicity channel can it be adequately placed before the "Court of Last Resort"—the American Bar of Public Opinion—and final decision had as to whether or not our Republic is to be destroyed by alienism.

With such American tribunal I rest my case supremely confident that the unimpeachable guilt-confessions "from the horse's mouth" herein documented, will bring conviction and emancipation action before it is too late.

Practically all the Petition evidence passed the court libel test with a judicial precedent-pronouncement that under American law no large group "defamation" broadcast is actionable if publication is motivated by concern for the public welfare and circulated in good faith. In this connection it is understood that the N. Y. judge's 1938 dismissal of the Edmondson group libel case was in response to the 1936 annual meeting dictum issued by the American Institute of Law at Washington, D. C., reported by the N. Y. Times of May 9, 1936, saying that "where the circumstances are such as to induce a reasonable belief that factors exist which affect a sufficiently important public interest," existing laws should be changed.

Under the influence of the high quality of the Petition evidence the new Congress, which is already responding to constituency pressure for exhaustive investigation of New Deal subversions, should welcome this hitherto unpublished-and-broadcast revealing documentation-identification.

Communist ideology ever howls for "academic freedom" in its "pull-down" propaganda of destruction. How can you even practice academic freedom until you have a base on and from which to operate? To what do American citizens owe first allegiance, to academic freedom or constitutional freedom of speech and press! Without the latter vantage point academic freedom cannot even exist. You may work to improve that base, not to destroy it. The U. S. Constitution does not authorize its citizens to subvert it—that is treason to it and also to academic freedom. As a matter of simple self-preservation the Constitution must impose on its citizenship the high DUTY of defending it. And you can't dodge the consequences of dodging your responsibilities.

The exposure seems so apt and well-deserved that I cannot refrain from paraphrasing below against these academic fanatics a philippic delivered to anti-assimilationists some years ago by a once great American citizen, viz.: More and more of late do we see the very foundations of that majestic and beneficent structure of The Republic clamorously assailed by those to whom it opened wide the Portals of Freedom. But they have been blinded by the glare of Liberty. Blinded, they dare force their guidance on Americans who for generations have walked in the Light of Liberty. Drunk with the strong wine of Freedom, they presume to impose their reeling gait upon citizens to whom Freedom has been a pure and refreshing fountain for a century and a half.

EXHAUSTIVE RESEARCH TO B.C.

The author's exhaustive research, in an earnest attempt to isolate and identify the genesis, origins and promoters of Communism, went back through recorded history Before Christ; thence downward through the centuries to "Proofs of a Conspiracy against all Religions and Government" by John Robison, Professor of Natural History and Secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburg, Scotland (1798); which book blazed "The Trail of the Serpent" of subversion, "The Illuminatti," to the sequel of the French Revolution, into the Bolshevist Marxian holocaust, and then the First and Second World Wars, to the present Soviet internationalist threat to all nations.

No other book like this is in existence. It is a memoir-recital of a man now in his eighties who, standing alone and childless "in the shadow" of inevitability, obviously can have no ulterior or selfish motive in producing it.

While this report to countrymen covers the high spots, a general review of correlative and corroborative evidence discloses an additional similar mass of what newspapermen call "good stuff" after applying the acid test of "cold print" inspection.

Its "official" character is attested by the fact that it is a Constitutional "Petition to Congress," which is the representative of the American Bar of Public Opinion, and therefore its legality cannot be successfully challenged; plus the further fact that such a status is affirmed by the following notaried oath which conveyed the Petition to the Congress:

"Personally appeared before me a notary public in and for the County of Deschutes of the State of Oregon, Robert Edward Edmondson, who swore that the foregoing Petition to Congress dated April 1, 1953, was written, compiled, published and circulated solely by him; that all this was done to the best of his knowledge and belief with honest conviction as to the truth of the matter presented therein with reasonable interpretations, and which he broadcast with the good motive of public interest, for the welfare and protection of The Republic of the United States of America; and that said Robert Edward Edmondson hereby offers one thousand dollars for proof that the author has intentionally falsified any part of said production."

In conclusion, speaking from the independent vantage point of half a century of strenuous service in the highly educative fields of The Fourth Estate, the logic of events impels the judgment that the average Occidental mind is at a loss to comprehend and interpret the fantastic aims and sadist cruelty of circuitous Oriental thinking as exposed herein; and most Americans seem not only unable to grasp the realities but are actually unwilling to accept as yet the sinister plot pattern now progressively unfolding. Witness: It required two decades of revolutionary suppression by the Roosevelt New Dealers merely to arouse the American People to take Liberation Step No. 1 on November 4, 1952.

MUST "THE LUNATIC FRINGE" BE SUMMONED "ONCE MORE TO THE BREACH?"

Robert Edward Edmondon

Dated April 1, 1953 At Bend, Oregon P. O. Box No. 854

(Summary of Book Contents) PETITION TO CONGRESS HIGH-LIGHTS

SECTION ONE, order of presentation: New Deal N. Y.-Washington indictments—unconditional Dismissals—Seven years of persecution—Patriotic Publicity Crusade origins 1933-4—Communistic New Deal called "Jew Deal" by leading Jew—Evolution of "Jewish-Anti-Americanism" slogan—1936 Arrest and imprisonment in N. Y. "Tombs" Jail—Charge "Libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion" for unmasking Jewish Communism—"Out on Bail," crusading—In 1938 Jews petition court to dismiss indictment as free speech violation—Unconditional Dismissal—Anti-Communist Publicity Crusade continued to Nov. 30, 1940—III-health Vacation: including unbelievably boastful Jewish detailed and written DOCUMENTED CONFESSIONS OF SADISTIC SECRET PLOTTING, INVISIBLE SABOTAGE, INTERNATIONALIST AND INTERNAL SOCIALISTIC REVOLUTION TO OVERTHROW THE U. S., its form of government and its Christian foundation, through civil war.

SECTION TWO, Order of presentation: New Deal "seditious conspiracy" indictments at Washington 1942—Mass-Trial 1944—Judge's death in November causes "mis-trial"—Unconditional Dismissal of Communistic Mass-Case in November, 1947—Persecution tactics at "Mess"-Trial exposed by daily diary reports from Defendant Edmondson's wife—Deadly Parallel—Court Exhibits uncover Communist Treason Warmongering—FDR Jewish Ancestry—New Deal conspiracy against defendants proved—Edmondson Testimonials and Biographical Sketch—ANALYSIS OF ANTI-SEMITISM—1952-3 Russian Jew Purges explained; Stalin Successors unmasked—Jewish Problem in solution—A REMEDY—including two decades of irrefutable record-proof of almost incredible internal and internationalist ACTS OF PLANNED NEW DEAL HIGH TREASON to The Constitutional Republic of the U. S. A., its political, educational and religious institutions, its Press and its Radio Systems.

A SOCIAL JUSTICE
Politico-Economic Solution
of
The Jewish World Problem

PETITION TO CONGRESS

This is a "Petition To Congress For Redress Of Grievances, Succor and Relief."

It is hereby filed with Congress under the authority of the Constitution of the United States of America, by the undersigned Robert Edward Edmondson, reporter, editor and publisher, a native-born citizen of pre-American Revolution ancestry Scotch descent. at present a legal voting resident of the State of Oregon, domiciled at Bend in Deschutes County; and who repeatedly voted against the Roosevelt Administration from its New Deal inception, casting his ballot November 4, 1952, for the straight Republican ticket.

During 1942-44 your Petitioner was indicted by the Roosevelt Administration's Department of Justice, charged with "seditious conspiracy," based on a free-speech non-profit patriotic-publicity peace-time one-man crusade exposing by documentation subversive Communism, its origins and propaganda, with the good motive of defending, protecting and preserving our Republic, beginning at the end of 1933 and concluding November 30, 1940.

Trial by Indictment No. 73086 of January 3, 1944, was begun in the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia at Washington, D. C. early in 1944 before Chief Justice Eicher.

On November 22, 1946, following failure of the New Deal prosecution to make a case after years of investigation and mistrial, the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia, by Chief Justice Laws, unconditionally dismissed indictments as a travesty on justice; with the public press terming the action a violation of the free speech amendment to the United States Constitution, while the Washington Times-Herald Nov. 23, 1946, printed: "The case was bred in malice, prosecuted in hate and pursued in bigotry."

Effective July 31, 1947, the U. S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D. C. AFFIRMED the lower court dismissal decision, ending the false mass-conspiracy charges after five years of futile prosecution by the Roosevelt Department of Justice, concluding with the following words:

"In this case the record shows that from January, 1946, to the dismissal order entered near the end of that year the trial court, AT THE INSTANCE of some of the defendants, AGAIN AND AGAIN SOUGHT TO COMPEL ACTION WHICH WOULD EITHER RESULT IN A TRIAL OR DISMISSAL

"Its final decision to adopt the latter course seems to us ALTOGETHER REASONABLE AND PROPER, AND IN FACT WE ARE NOT PREPARED TO SAY THAT IT WAS NOT COMPELLED, in the light of the facts then shown to exist."

FULL TEXT OF DISMISSAL DECISION

Below is copy of the complete text of the unconditional dismissal decision of the Washington "Mass-Case" as handed down on Nov. 22, 1946, by Chief Justice Laws and upheld by the U. S. Court of Appeals effective July 31, 1947, ending the prosecution.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE U. S. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States of America
vs.

Jos. E. McWilliams et al,
Defendants

Criminal No. 73086

MEMORANDUM ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

These cases are before me on motions to dismiss, lately filed by permission of the

Until yesterday, so far as the Court has been informed, the prosecution has been chiefly entrusted to O. John Rogge, Spl. Asst. to the Arty. Gen.

On Jan. 25, 1946, when the Court heard previous motions to dismiss, Mr. Rogge stated that, in view of late decisions of the Supreme Court of the U. S., he felt doubtful as to whether a conviction of the defendants would be sustained. Counsel explained this was his personal opinion; that the Dept. of Justice had not taken a postion in the matter, and for this reason he was not at liberty to state its opinion.

Two weeks later Mr Rogge again appeared before the Court upon further hearings of the motions to dismiss. The Court asked whether he then was in a position to tell whether the prosecution wished to proceed with the case.

The Court was requested to give the Government a reasonable amount of time to answer this question. However, on this occasion the Chief Prosecutor again stated that, after considering Supreme Court decisions in comparable cases, it was his personal view that it was doubtful whether a conviction would be sustained.

The Court then took the question of dismissing the cases under advisement.

On Mar. 1, 1946, while the matter was pending under advisement, counsel for the prosecution applied to the Court to postpone its ruling for a period of thirty days, alleging it was believed certain testimony might be available from witnesses in Germany which would directly establish guilt of certain of the defendants.

When this application was presented it was stated the Attorney-General wished to send Mr. Rogge to Germany to make an investigation. Counsel for defendants objected.

While unusual in the midst of a long-pending criminal case to permit an investigation to endeavor to build up a doubtful case. I decided, because the charges were serious and access to possible evidence previously had been foreclosed by the war with Germany, I should permit time for the investigation.

Accordingly, the prosecution was granted until Apr. 30. 1946, a longer time than had been asked. A written memorandum filed by the Court granting this time that "on or before April 30, 1946, counsel for the prosecution will be expected to advise the Court in writing (copy to be sent to each defendant) whether prosecution of the case is desired; also whether, in his judgement, a conviction of defendants, if one is obtained, may be sustained under controlling decisions of the Supreme Court of the U. S."

On Apr. 30, 1946, a memorandum was filed by one of counsel for the prosecution, staring that prosecution was desired, "provided the prosecution's investigation being presently conducted in Germany elicits additional evidence of guilt of defendants." This memorandum stated that the investigation had not been completed, and that 45 days additional time would be required.

While I did not specifically grant the additional time to complete the investigation it eventuated that Government counsel was able to secure this time, because it was not until May 18, 1946, that the motions to dismiss the indictments were over-ruled.

The case was called on Sept. 20, 1946, for the purpose of setting a date for trial. On this occasion, Chief Prosecutor Rogge, being asked the third time in eight months,

the attitude of the prosecution, stated that there still remained in his mind the question whether there was sufficient evidence to meet the test of the Supreme Court cases. He said he had serious doubts on this point, as he previously had advised the Court, but that the Dept. of Justice wished to suggest a trial date in December.

Mr. Rogge informed the Court that an analysis he had made of evidence found in Germany had been turned over to the Dept. of Justice the previous week.

Motion to Dismiss Granted

Inasmuch as Mr. Rogge informed the Court, on three occasions, one after a lengthy investigation in Germany, had stated to the Court his serious doubts of a successful prosecution, a renewal of the motions to dismiss was permitted. The motions to dismiss now under consideration then were filed.

On yesterday, at the time of the hearing upon these motions. Mr. Rogge was not present representing the prosecution. Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the first time entered his appearance in behalf of the prosecution.

Mr. Caudle stated the Dept, wished to prosecute all of the cases and to have a date set for the trial; that the Dept, did not share the doubts of Mr. Rogge.

The Court requested Mr. Caudle to state his reasons why those now in charge had a different view from Mr. Rogge.

In answer, Mr. Caudle made no statement of reasons.

However, he offered to submit to the Court a trial brief which had been prepared and a written report of Mr. Rogge made to the Atty. Gen. Asked whether these documents would also be made available to the defendants, prosecutor stated they would not.

Counsel for the defendants objected to the Court's examining the documents without copies being furnished them.

The Court then informed counsel that by reason of the recent condemnation by the Conference of Senior Circuit Judges of the U.S., at a meeting presided over by the Chief Justice of the U.S., of the practice prevailing in some districts of trial judges receiving from the prosecution a brief or other documents not furnished opposing counsel, he was not in a position to consider the trial brief and the report of Mt. Rogge.

The defendants have undergone before a Court and jury part of a trial which ended on Nov. 29, 1944, by reason of the sudden death of the presiding justice. The prosecution was still in progress at the conclusion of this trial, which had been under way for eight months. Eighteen thousand pages of testimony were taken and 1100 documents were introduced in evidence. The prosecution was formally brought to a close Dec. 7, 1944.

Beginning on Dec. 9, 1944, and from time to time thereafter, various defendants have sought a speedy trial of their cases. For nearly two years such a trial has not been made possible for them. Their Constitutional right to a speedy trial has been denied.

I can reach no other conclusion than that there is a serious doubt as to validity of these cases. More than eight months is an abnormally long time to be required by the prosecution to establish guilt in a clear case. One would expect convincing testimony of guilt to be fully adduced long before the expiration of such a length of time.

When a retrial was in prospect, the Chief Prosecutor, who, more than any other person, is familiar with the cases, expressed his doubts as to sustaining a conviction; and because of these doubts made the unusual request for permission to hold the question of their retrial in abeyance until he could make further investigation into the facts. Not only two times before this request was made, but on one occasion lately, after a lengthy investigation had been completed in Germany, this Court asked the prosecution whether it desired to retry the case. Until yesterday, there was no answer that it did.

If these defendants are guilty, it would seem that any serious doubts as to their guilt would be resolved in more than five years of intensive investigation by able counsel and investigators of the Dept. of Justice.

If they were clearly guilty, the prosecution should have unwaveringly assured the Court to this effect, at least upon the completion of the investigation in Germany.

Usually the Court will permit the prosecutor to decide whether he will bring a case to trial; but when it appears, as here, there is serious doubt as to the success of the case, and that the defendants, because of long delays granted over their objections, cannot obtain a fair trial, the Court should exercise its discretion to deny prosecution. It would be both unjust and un-American to do otherwise.

The defendants have been before the Cours upon these charges for nearly four and one-half years. All of them were brought here from other parts of the country to stand trial. Because of the impoverished state of the defendants, they were represented by counsel not of their own choice but assigned by the Court to serve without compensation.

As in all long-delayed cases, the witnesses now are scattered; some are not accessible.

more particularly to the defendants who are without funds: the memories of witnesses as to events occurring many years ago, are not clear. It is for these reasons, among others, that the Constitution of the U.S. requires a speedy trial, and that the Congress of the U.S. has imposed Statutes of Limitation to prevent long-delayed prosecutions.

I DO NOT SEE HOW THESE DEFENDANTS CAN NOW POSSIBLY OBTAIN FAIR TRIALS.

Under the circumstances, to permit another trial, conceivably lasting more than a year, with new prosecutors and newly-appointed counsel for defendants, with the eventual outcome in serious doubt, as Mr. Rogge has stated to the Court on three occasions, would be A TRAVESTY ON JUSTICE.

I have no doubt the cases should be dismissed, and an order to that effect will be entered as to all defendants.

The question of terminating these cases is one of importance. If the dismissal I shall order is sustained, new prosecutions may not be started, because they will be barred by the Statute of Limitations.

The Court feels that the prosecution should have opportunity, if so advised, to take action by way of application to appellate courts to review my order dismissing the cases. While this seems to me to be possible after final judgments of dismissal, nevertheless, in order to safeguard the interests of the prosecution against any doubt, the final order of dismissal will not be entered by the Court until Dec. 2, 1946.

The Court should and does acknowledge with gratitude the services of counsel who served in behalf of the defendants without compensation. Their sacrifices were extensive; their financial losses were great. Specifically, the Court thanks for their services in these cases, W. Hobart Little, Frank H. Myers, Elizabeth R. Young, J. Austin Latimer, M. Edward Buckley, Orville C. Gaudette, P. Bateman Ennis, John S. Hillyard, Ethelbert B. Frey, Harry A. Grant, James A. Davis, Ben Lindas, Frank J. Kelly, Arthur Carroll, Charles E. Morganston, Claude Thompson, William Gallagher, Joseph H. Bilbrey, Rees B. Gillespie, L. J. H. Herwig, John B. Gunion and George B. Fraser.

(Signed)

BOLITHA J. LAWS Chief Justice

Washington, D. C. Nov. 22, 1946. (Emphasis Supplied

GROSS ABUSE OF COURTS

The following points are from the personally composed and formally presented appeal to the Washington Court of Appeals which upheld dismissal, entitled "Brief of Robert Edward Edmondson, Appellee, opposing Appellant's Plea Against Dismissal," which brief was highly commended by defense counsel:

"Why did the prosecution in the mass-case go back twenty-five years in the third indictment mistrial—as per Bill of Particulars and mistrial transcript—in search of evidence of criminal intent after Indictment No. 2 was struck because it violated the ex post facto clause of the Constitution by going back ten years? In its German-American Bund draft-evasion reversal-decision of June 11, 1945, the U. S. Supreme Court reprimanded the prosecution for going back only seven years.

"In view of the revelations herein made exposing the "infirmities-of-proofby-imputation" Prosecutor Rogge "secret report," why did the Justice Department even consider offering such an unacceptable document to Chief Justice Laws Nov. 21, 1946, in support of its request for retrial, since the subject matter thereof was not only palpably irrelevant to the mass-case charge but was inadmissible in court on hearsay grounds?

"Did the Justice Dept. offer such material knowing it to be inadmissible? Or, could it be so professionally ignorant as not to be able to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant evidence?

"Affirmative answers to either query would be damning!

"Exemplifying the vengeful, scandalous and libelous smear-technic apparently inculcated into the legal staff of the Department of Justice, Chief Prosecutor Rogge, who thrice admitted that he was unable to make a case, viciously attacked defendants' patriotism publicly in numerous lectures on his investigations in Nazi-Germany, delivered under the auspices of Jewish organizations in cities of states where defendants were resident, including Pennsylvania, California, Washington, Illinois and Michigan, continuing the smear-campaign in New York and Massachusetts after the mass-case was unconditionally dismissed.

"Mr. Rogge's amazing admission during an invitation-address before the American Jewish Congress as reported by the Boston Post of Dec. 2, 1946, disclosing the exceptionally high, wholly unimpeachable and unmistakable pro-American source of patriotic financial donations made to certain impoverished anti-Communist defendants during mistrial, thereby canceled out and utterly disproved his own Nazi bribery allegations made Mar. 1, 1946. All of which unmasks the inherently oppressive character of the Justice Dept. appeal from the lower court dismissal."

(After O. John Rogge, mass-case prosecutor, was discharged by the Department of Justice, he was reported in the public press as repeatedly acting as counsel for notorious pro-Communist elements, and once visited Soviet Russia "to pay his respects" to Stalin in Moscow.)

Continued quotations from the Edmondson brief follow below:

"Court-appointed Counsel Frey of Washington, D. C., wrote defendant Edmondson Feb. 21, 1945, reporting mass-case hearings on Feb. 19 before U. S. District Courr Associate Justice T. Alan Goldsborough. He quoted Justice Goldsborough as stating in open court after hearing oral arguments: "I don't know if this trial is going on again or not. If so, IT IS BLOODY MURDER!" Mr. Frey wrote: "That is exactly what he said." (This writer understands that Justice Goldsborough was a member of the banc of judges who wrote later the "mistrial" decision in the mass-case.)

"In his 1945 book The March of Bolshevism, Judge Geo. W. Armstrong of Texas, says the obvious Marxian conspiracy to deprive mass-case defendants of their Constitutional rights, with the connivance of the Attorney-General's Department," is such a serious abuse of the courts and of governmental power... that Congress should turn the searchlight of publicity on those who have brought about this infamous prosecution."

"It is of the essence of liberty that it be recognized that guilt is personal and cannot be attributed to the holding of opinions or to mere intent in the absence of overt acrs."—Former Chief Justice Hughes of the U. S. Supreme Court, to New York Assembly members in 1920, regarding expulsion of Socialists.

In his brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals from which the above quotations are taken, Defendant Edmondson emphasized the repeated evidence that

the Roosevelt Administration's Department of Justice did not go into court with clean hands; that it acted in bad faith during procedure; that it ignored U.S. Supreme Court precedent decisions; that it made exploratory searches as well as illegal seizures; that it flagrantly failed to uphold the vital Constitutional decrees of ex post facto and impartial and speedy justice.

"NO JURISDICTION" MOTION TO DISMISS

In consideration of the positive declaration of defense-counsel that the prosecution in the seditious conspiracy case had even failed to establish the legal right to try the indictment in Washington, Defendant Edmondson submitted to Chief Justice Laws under date of May 20. 1946, the following "Motion to Dismiss" the case on the ground that the judiciary, according to U.S. Supreme Court decisions cited, lacked jurisdiction anywhere to handle this essentially political case, which was de facto under the exclusive power of Congress.

"Now comes Ethelbert B. Frey, Attorney for Robert Edward Edmondson, defendant, says his client is innocent of the charge of conspiring to undermine the loyalty of U.S. armed forces, should not be prosecuted further, and hereby respectfully moves this honorable Court to dismiss all charges against him on the ground of lack of judicial power jurisdiction in the marter, as established by decisions of the United States Supreme Court, refusing to consider questions presented because they were political and not under control of the judicial power. (AUTHORITY: Questions arising under a republican-form of government are political, not judicial, and are for Congress, not courts. Ohio v. Akron Metro. Park Dist., 281 U.S. 80, L. ed. 715, 50 S. Ct., 230, 66 ALR 1465.)

"WHEREFORE, since this matter has degenerated into a wholly POLITI-CAL set-up, and is therefore beyond the jurisdiction of the Judicial Power, defendant hereby petitions the Court to forthwith dismiss the three indictments in furtherance of justice and in the public interest."

(Signed May 20, 1946) Robert Cowar & Edmondfon

While that motion was denied it will be noted that the accompanying affidavit (cited hereafter) not only refutes before dismissal, seriatim and meticulously, principal conspiracy allegations of the Roosevelt prosecution but unmasks the real conspiracy in this matter, namely, a conspiracy by the Roosevelt Department of Justice to deprive Edmondson of his substantial rights as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution—which policy follows precisely "the Communist Line" of attempting to conceal its own guilt by accusing adversaries of crimes the Communists themselves are actually committing.

(Note: Chief Justice Laws of the U. S. District Court of the District of Columbia, unconditionally dismissed the seditious conspiracy case as a travesty on justice six months after this Motion To Dismiss by Edmondson May 20, 1946.)

In the record below, to enhance simplicity and accuracy and to clarify, the accompanying affidavit has been individualized and focused as much as possible consistent with important facts; diversive irrelevancies being minimized by concentration on essentials.

ALLEGATION: That defendants issued propaganda to destroy the American form of Government.

REBUTTAL: Whereas, in an address Aug. 14, 1940, at Stoddartsville, Penna., delivered to Boy Scouts, Defendant Edmondson said: "Usurpers have sought to destroy our protective system of checks-and-balances by a communizing process labeled 'democracy.' In these days of peril we should be more on guard than ever to protect traditional Americanism from alien labels and foreign ideologies of all kinds. The American Model is unique and unlike other so-called republics, and it is the best government on earth. We should be prepared to defend it against all comers."

The foregoing address—one of many defence exhibits—was printed under the title "American Republic Model Best."

ALLEGATION: That defendant wanted a one-party system like that of the Nazis

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, on July 18, 1940, Defendant Edmondson published a bulletin headed "Commandeer & Compel Labor & Capital," declaring: "This is a two-party nation."

ALLEGATION: That defendant "intended to abolish Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Assembly."

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, Defendant Edmondson on May 12, 1938, published under the caption "Court Dismissal" statements regarding his publications, saying that his "patriotic politico-economic exposures were directed without hate, to defend-protect-preserve the peace and safety of the Constitutional State against irreligious Jewish-Communist subversions thereof... Our great Constitutional Form of Government stands or falls with Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly."

REBUTTAL NO. 2. Under the title "Free The Press!." on Mar. 3, 1938, Defendant Edmondson published: "Our Constitutional Guarantees have been communized and broken down by the 'terrible power of the purse' operating through the 'great power of the press.' FREE THE PRESS—and the Constitution is preserved! FREE THE PRESS—And America is saved! I am for free speech ballots—not communistic bullets. By public enlightenment, bloodshed can be avoided. Let the people know The Truth! They will act to Rescue The Republic!"

ALLEGATION: That defendant wanted to run the U.S. as a totalitarian state in accord with the Nazi Leadership Principle.

REBUTTAL: Whereas, on Oct. 24, 1935, Defendant Edmondson published a bulletin headed "Why Americanism Rejects Socialism," in which he stated: "German Socialism . . . retains the European mass-action 'master-leadership' principle, which is un-American . . . The world political struggle today is between the American Ideal of Individual Liberty and the foreign doctrine of regimentation."

ALLEGATION: Defendant agreed that they should destroy our form of government and set up a Nazi or Fascist form.

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, Defendant Edmondson published Apr. 23, 1934, a bulletin captioned "Mis-Representative Minority Government," stating: "Being pro-American, this writer is ANTI-FASCIST, anti-communist and ANTI-SOCIALIST, because these forces have been obviously subverting Americanism; having threatened to destroy the very foundation of American Liberty . . . This writer is pro-American under the Constitution; for Representative Government without selfish minority dictation; for Individual Liberty without license; for Equality of Opportunity with profit-reward; for capitalistic economic freedom minus predatory practices."

REBUTTAL NO. 2. Whereas, Defendant Edmondson published Feb. 24, 1938, under "Patriots Halt Internationalists," his lecture on Americanism before the German-American Bund in N.Y. City following an FBI 1937 investigation-report clearing the BUND of Nazi subversive activities, in which address was the following:

"Are you a Fascist?"—I am asked

"The answer is NO."

"Are you inclined toward Fascism for America?"

"No, the dictatorship regimentation thereof is un-American."

"Do you favor German Nazism for the U.S.?"

"I do not. It represents regimentation by master-leadership, which is also un-American. ALLEGATION: Defendant appealed to members of the armed forces to be disloyal to our democracy form of government.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson challenges the prosecution to produce ONE such appeal. His publications were always addressed to the American People under the constitutional free press guarantee—never addressed to members of U. S. armed forces.

ALLEGATION: Defendant attacked every step our government made to defend itself."

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, Defendant Edmondson wrote May 20, 1940 under the publication title "High Treason:" "There is no excuse for not making America invincible to all comers . . . The Hour is Grave! And the time has come to make the voice of We The People effective in Washington. . . . Rescue The Republic! Make it Invincible!"

REBUTTAL NO. 2. "Keep America out of the second Jew-made European War!" published Defendant Edmondson Sept. 4, 1939, under the title "STAY OUT OF THE SUICIDE WAR!," in an appeal to the American people calling for "Billions for defense against invasion but not one drop of American Christian blood for the second kosher suicide war!"

ALLEGATION: That defendant set race against race by publications to promote the Nazi racial concept in the U.S.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson declared Oct. 24, 1935, summing up the Nazi German racial stand: "COMPOSED OF MANY RACES, America cannot cultivate 'A RACIAL SOUL' like Germany"—captioning the article "Why Americanism REJECTS Socialism"

ALLEGATION: That defendant "identified himself by the main label of anti-Communist;" spread propaganda that Communists were trying to take over the U.S.; accused many of our public officials of being Communists; labeled everything he opposed as Communist and Jewish including international bankers and democracy; and preached hatred of Communism and Jews.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson admits being anti-Communist because Communism is directly against the American constitutional representative republican form of government.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson is "being prosecuted for circulating, right up to the time of the finding of Indictment 73086 on Jan. 3, 1944, thousands of documents describing President Roosevelt as a Jew because some of his ancestors were named Jacob, Sarah and Samuel—carrying the implication that he got the country into the war to help fellow-Jews," and "referring to the President as a warmonger."

REBUTTAL: NO. 1. Since Defendant Edmondson retired from all publishing activities Nov. 30, 1940, he could not have been "circulating" said documents "up to Jan. 3, 1944."

To uncover and explain to his countrymen what he believed to be President Roosevelt's Jewish anti-Americanism and pro-Internationalism, which put Jewish before American interests. Defendant Edmondson, many years before the Nazis in 1939 referred to it, reproduced previous publications as below listed which traced the Roosevelt ancestry to the Rosenvelt-Samuels Family of Holland.

The Daily Citizen of Tucson, Ariz., Published Mar. 7, 1934, a Roosevelt genealogy made up in the Carnegie Institution of Washington, showing descent from the Rosenvelt-Samuels Family of Holland.

The St. Petersburg, Fla., Times of Feb. 8, 1934, printed an interview with former Gov. Chase Osborn of Michigan, personal friend of Franklin D. Roosevelt, detailing Roosevelt's Jewish descent from the same Holland ancestry.

REBUTTAL NO. 2. This defendant believed President Roosevelt was warmongering by placing Jewish interests in peace and war before those of The Republic, in view of the following associations:

"The Social Justice Committee of the Rabbinical Assembly favors the general tendency of the recently adopted social legislation in particular the scope of the Tennessee Valley Authority. It endorses the President's plan for reorganization (packing) of the U.S. Supreme Court."—From the Jewish National Day of N.Y. City, May 11, 1937.

Challenging the present American social system, the Central Conference of American Rabbis, largest Sanhedrin in the world, at its 1936 annual convention, declared by resolution: "We advocate a socialization of basic enterprises. There is only one way in which the American People can escape Fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing A THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY." (N.Y. Times, Sept. 13, 1936) A thoroughly socialized democracy is communism.

"The man behind the U.S. Supreme Court repacking process was Samuel I. Rosenman, close friend of the President."—Washington Correspondent Paul Mallon, Feb. 7, 1937.

President Roosevelt appointed Felix Frankfurter to the U.S. Supreme Court Jan. 4, 1939, although he had never administered a judgeship.

A short history of B'nai B'rith in England, written by Paul Goodman, Past President, says: "In the U.S. the B'nai B'rith Order is the power behind the President."—Free Press of London, July, 1938.

The late Gen. Hugh Johnson, who called President Roosevelt "The Jewish People's Idol" in the N. Y. World-Telegram of June 19, 1939, wrote in the Philadelphia Inquirer of June 18, 1940: "There is no longer any question that Mr. Roosevelt is exercising no effort to keep us out of war. It may not be fair to say that it is his purpose to exert every effort within his supposedly limited powers to get us into war; but at least this statement is incontestible: EVERY ACT OF HIS IN THE PAST THREE YEARS IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH A PURPOSE, AND NO ACT IS INCONSISTENT THEREWITH. It is shooting craps with the country's destiny."

"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread all over Europe and the world, as it is organized and worked by Jews."—Netherlands Minister to Russia reporting to the British Govt. in September, 1918.—From U.S. State Dept. Book 1931. entitled "Foreign Relations of the U.S., Russia I," Pages 674-679. Library of Congress.

The 1919 Overman Report to the U. S. Senate contains much evidence that leaders of the Bolshevist Revoltion were largely Jewish.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson attacked New Deal public officials, with intent to undermine the confidence of the American people in them.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson's "attacks" were exposures of New Deal anti-Americanism, delivered under authority of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and were in direct response to a Presidential call (Oct. 15, 1933) to newspapermen for criticism of New Deal policies.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson spoke before the German-American Bund meetings. He spoke at a Bund meeting Oct. 30, 1937, at the N. Y. Hippodrome.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson challenges the prosecution to produce any evidence whatever that he spoke at that Hippodrome meeting. He lectured on Americanism once before the Bund Feb. 24, 1938, after a 1937 FBI investigation report had cleared that organization of Nazi subversive activities.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson collaborated with the German-American Bund, exchanging publications with it.

REBUTTAL: By advice of counsel, Defendant Edmondson never joined nor collaborated with any group or organization whatever, maintaining an independent position in his anti-Communist activities. He exchanged publications with many publishers, in accord with established custom.

ALLEGATION: Defendant Edmondson worked with James True and Geo. E. Deatherage.

REBUTTAL: Publisher Edmondson exchanged publications with Publishers True and Deatherage in the customary publishers-exchange relationship. He did not meet either of them until about a year after he had engaged in his one-man crusade for Americanism.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson was in contact with the German Embassy at Washington.

REBUTTAL: While publishing from the country hamlet of Stoddartsville, Penna. Defendant Edmondson received a Martin Luther pamphlet printed in German. Not understanding German, he sent it to the German Embassy at Washington asking for the courtesy of translation—which was done. That is the sum total of such contact.

ALLEGATION: That after Pearl Harbor defendant asserted that our Government deliberately invited the Japanese attack Dec. 7, 1941.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson retired from all publishing activities Nov. 30, 1940, more than a year before Pearl Harbor, and consequently could not have published the assertion indicated.

ALLEGATION: That defendant called Democracy decadent and wnnted to destroy our democracy form of government.

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Just how could defendant conspire to destroy a democracy form of government in the U.S. where such a setup does not exist, in view of the following facts:

(A) The Founders of the U.S. specifically repudiated "democracy," the "Father of the Constitution," James Madison, stating that it was incompatible with personal security and the right of private property; (B) Since Sec. 4 of Art. 4 of their Constitution, which did not contain the word "democracy," by the simple act of guaranteeing to each state in the Union a REPUBLICAN form of government, completely bars a democracy-form; and (C) The 1928 U.S. Army Citizenship Training Manual seals the anti-democracy verdict with these words: "The Government of the United States is NOT a Democracy BUT A REPUBLIC."

ALLEGATION: Defendant Edmondson "followed the Nazi Line" in-

Attacking Democracy: Whereas he was guided by the repudiation of the Democracy-Form by the Founders of the U.S., whose Constitution bars from the Nation any but a Republican Form of government;

In Attacking Public Officials: Whereas, he exposed their New Deal political Social Democracy ideology as destructive of our Constitutional Representative Republican System—doing so long before the Nazi attacked U.S. public administrators;

In Attacking President Roosevelt: Whereas, five years before the Nazis attacked the President as a Jew, this defendant exposed his Jewish Internationalism and his state socialist domestic policies as diametrically against the interests of The Republic;

In Attacking Communism: Whereas, this defendant was guided in such activity by the Principles laid down in the book "Communism Unmasked" by Maj. Gen. A. A. Fries, USA retired, which American Army high official pointed out over a decade ago that Communism was the worst enemy of The Republic, and that Fascism was merely the name applied to all anti-Communists by Communists themselves.

In Attacking Jews: Whereas, he directed his attack against Jews who were undermining our form of Government by aggressive and forceful Socialism, Communism and Sovietism—calling attention to the historic fact tha: "Anti-Semitism" ("exclusively a product of European politics" according to the 1910 edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica), had been in existence in Germany 50 years pre-Hitler. (See Donald S. Strong 1941 book "Organized Anti-Semitism in U.S.")

Not only did the prosecution in the mass-case fail to establish venue in the City of Washington in the District of Columbia (as indicated in the "Not Guilty Joint Starement" of defence-attorneys), but also JUDICIAL jurisdiction, in view of the overwhelming POLITICAL character of this case which automatically removes it from consideration by the JUDICIAL POWER into the province of the LEGISLATIVE—as witness decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court cited hereafter, refusing to take jurisdiction in similar cases on the specific ground that they constitutionally come under the control of Congress.

The essentially political nature of the prosecution's allegations is obvious in the indictment, the bill of particulars and the prosecutor's address to the 1944 trial jury, as pointed out below; being replete with political terms, i.e.:

"Forms of Government;" "republican;" "totalisarum state;" "Democracy;"
"Party program"; "Nazi movement;" "New Deal Party;" "Socialist;" "Communist;"
"Nazi or Socialist State;" "National Socialist Party;" "British Imperialism;" "Presidential election;" "political campaign;" "Anti-Semitism."

(The political phrase "National SOCIALIST German Workers PARTY" and its derivatives appears 240 times in the prosecutor's 1944 address to the trial jury; "Democracy" 50 times; "Communist" 39; "Anti-Semitic" 33 and "Fascist" 13 times.)

In his long address to the trial jury the prosecutor repeatedly emphasized the point that "Anti-Semitism" was "the spearhead of the Nazi Party movement;" thereby bringing the essential nature of these indictments to a POLITICAL focus on "ANTI-SEMI-TISM." which is not a crime under American Law.

The following citation is from Page 168 of "The Constitution Of The U.S., Its Sources And Its Application," a 1941-5 hook by Thomas James Norton, published by "The Committee For Constitutional Government," 205 E. 42nd St., New York City.

"In 1912 a taxpayer in Oregon . . . claimed that the Amendment of 1902 to the Constitution of Oregon, by which the people reserved to themselves the right to propose amendments to the Constitution and to enact or reject at the polls laws or amendments independent of the legislative assembly, had destroyed the republican-form of government which had been guaranteed by the National Constitution.

"The U.S. Supreme Court said that the questions presented HAVE LONG SINCE BY THIS COURT BEEN DEFINITELY DETERMINED TO BE POLITICAL AND GOVERNMENT, AND EMBRACED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE POWERS CONFERRED UPON CONGRESS, AND NOT THEREFORE WITHIN THE REACH OF THE JUDICIAL POWER."

Which apparently puts this miscalled sedition case under the sole jurisdiction of Congress because practically every page of the indictment (except the charging part), the bill of particulars and the prosecutor's opening address to the trial jury is OVER-WHELMINGLY POLITICAL IN CHARACTER; coming directly under the free speech authority of the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Robert & oward & amongfou

Subscribed and sworn to before me a Notary Public in and for the County of Nevada, State of California, on this 23rd day of April, 1946.

Lynne Kelly Notary Public

ADDENDA

Below is a perfect example of the attempt by the prosecution to follow the infamous "Lasswell Thought Parallel" thesis of "guilt by association" notwithstanding its repeated denunciation by the U.S. Supreme Court.

• (a) The Nazis were anti-Semitic; Defendant Edmondson was anti-Semitic; therefore defendant was Nazi.
• (b) The Nazis were anti-Communist; defendant was anti-Communist; hence, defendant was Nazi.
• (c) The Nazis wanted to keep U.S. out of war; defendant wanted to keep U.S. out of war; ergo, defendant was Nazi.
• (d) The Nazis and Fascists were anti-Roosevelt; defendant was anti-Roosevelt; so the defendant was Nazi and Fascist.
• (e) The Nazis and Fascists were anti-Democracy; defendant was anti-Democracy; so Defendant was Nazi and Fascist, notwithstanding he accepted the dictum of the 1928 U.S. Army Training Manual that "The United States is NOT a Democracy but a Republic."

WASHINGTON PROSECUTION SEQUEL TO N. Y. INDICTMENT

The foregoing unmasks a subversive New Deal political conspiracy to suppress news vital to the peace, dignity and safety of the American people: for the mass-prosecution was, as regards your Petitioner, a sequel to a June 11, 1936, New Deal New York City group libel indictment sponsored personally by Roosevelt advisor Mayor LaGuardia, against Defendant Edmondson, which action, when defendant in 1938 announced his READINESS FOR TRIAL, was promptly and unconditionally dismissed on the court's own motion, as WITHOUT WARRANT IN LAW and "in furtherance of justice"—and in direct violation of the free speech amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as ADMITTED in amicus curaie "backdown" petitions to the Court by the American Civil Liberties Union, American Jewish Congress et al. New Deal supporters whose members had previously publicly applauded the mayor's indictment, for which the latter was given a medal.

SUBVERSION—CORRUPTION—TREASON EXPOSED

The mass of documentation hereinafter submitted, not only in justification but in the line of further performance of patriotic duty, is of unique character: and your Petitioner is convinced that the invaluable confession documents quoted will effectively aid Congressional investigators in their present task of unmasking New Deal overt act treason to The Republic, as well as unprecedented politico-economic corruption.

Identification of the secret forces which have been promoting national destruction by acts as well as published propaganda, is unerringly indicated by circumstantial and direct evidence, providing testimony beyond reasonable doubts.

Verbatim quotations are provided by the following:

• (1) Exhibits in court procedure of twenty-two months in New Deal New York prosecution and five years in Washington.
• (2) Responsible "overt evidence" amply supported upholds this writer's legal exposures of the undermining of our Republic and traditional Americanism.
• (3) Original and photostat copies of historic books, pamphlets, documents, illustrations, etc., from all over the world, substantiate accusations regarding origins of Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Liberalism, Bolshevism and allied national subversions.
• (4) There are revealing confessions of guilt by boastful published confessions from "the horse's mouth," almost unbelieveable, staggering occidental imagination by their arrogance and sadism.
• (5) Edmondson bulletin publications of themselves completely refuting seditious conspiracy charges of the New Deal prosecutions, are shown to have been in the possession of Roosevelt Department of Justice lawyers before indictments were made.

The documentation next following begins with factors leading to the patriotic non-profit Edmondson Crusade, reported chronologically hereinafter as nearly as possible.

ROOSEVELT CALL FOR CRITICISM

Publisher Edmondson responded to a call to The Press for criticism, issued by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, as published in the New York Times of Oct. 14, 1933, from which the following is taken:

"This program (New Deal) is too vast an undertaking for any one man or set of men to make sure of. I rely on you newspapermen to check us. I

want your criticism as well as your support."

Following public endorsement of Roosevelt's platform promises, your Petitioner,—a journalist specializing in politico-economic fields—answered that call in good faith with an Oct. 24, 1933, signed bulletin headed "Wholesale Reform Blocking Recovery;" pointing out that wholesale reforms were operating to prevent business recovery, listing definite factors, concluding with "Replace Reform Fears With Recovery Confidence."

That constructive criticism publication was sent to the White House and later broadcast from coast to coast.

Finding no evidence of action along the lines suggested, becoming increasingly alarmed over repetitional evidence of communistic penetration into National administration key-posts, about two months later I wrote and published on Dec. 27, 1933, an "open signed letter" addressed "Mr. President: Do You Favor This un-Americanism?", from which the following extracts are quoted:

"Washington political communists are boring from within to undermine the American Government. Communists in Government service, by arrogantly making a false blanket accusation against all in the capitalist class, have cunningly counted upon fear to protest. In view of the foregoing and your recent call to The Press for criticism (of the New Deal) the time has come to ask, Mr. President, are you in sympathy with such apparent trend toward State Socialism? If not, why are those who seek to overthrow it allowed to stay in Government service against the interests of American citizens? Such unchecked boring shakes the foundations of The Republic. Is a new form of government to be forced upon Americans by a system of secret covenants secretly arrived at? Those of us who think for ourselves want to know, Mr. President."

That "open letter," was mailed to the White House, broadcast throughout the United States, and received widespread approbation. (It was "answered" in 1936 by a New York indictment against the undersigned in direct violation of the free speech amendment to the U. S. Constitution.)

Dated Mar. 27, 1934, an Edmondson bulletin captioned "Bankrupt Leadership" was given nationwide circulation, one patriotic agency mailing 20,000 copies. In it I categorically enumerated Roosevelt administration acts which were causing confusion and business uncertainty, promoting politico-economic unsettlement along the "Communistic Line:"

"Has a sinister alien economic power secretly gained invisible control of important political machinery as well as that of the channels of publicity and the U.S. monetary system?"

"Some of our friends kindly warn that we may be framed for daring to exercise the Constitutional right of free speech—but you might as well be crucified one way as well as another."

The foregoing "frame warning" was translated into action when I was group-libel indicted in New York; and prosecuted in Washington, D. C., 1942-7, as a seditions conspirator.

ORIGINS OF THE EDMONDSON CRUSADE

About April first, 1934, John T. Mills, associated with a prominent N.Y. Stock Exchange firm; Lewis Gouveneur Morris, descendant of a signer of the Declaration of Independence; and Clarence M. Chauncey, member of the Union League Club and of a prominent New York family, actively and practically working against Communism, communicated with Editor at his New York publication headquarters, following anti-Communist bulletins. They wanted to know if I was informed as to who was really behind the subversions of Communism and Socialism.

I replied "no."

"Will you read printed proof as to the internationalists promoting such anti-national propaganda?"

"Yes," was the answer, and I was given a large supply of old and modern historical books, pamphlets, and other documents, chiefly from British patriotic sources.

Those publications were carefully read and verified from New York Public Library sources in many cases; and, after intensive study, analysis and digestion I became fully convinced as to the identity of leadership-forces propagandizing and subversively using Communism and Socialism to undermine our Republic.

To the best of this Petitioner's recollection he was never harmed personally by Jews, and therefore his approach to the Jewish Problem could not have stemmed from personal animus; and it is worthy of note that he had three decades of previous experience as an independent successful reporter, editor and analyst in the greatest Jewish financial center of the world—New York's Wall St.—with its vicious cycles of international manipulation of security markets into general inflation-booms and depression-busts, due to calculated shiftings of cash billions, as dictated by the materialistic Gospel of Get.

It was this exceptional experience with its comprehensive knowledge, continual investment analysis and trained observation, which enabled him promptly to understand and with unerring accuracy to interpret the concrete suppressed record presented to him in 1934 by responsible sources as to the Cause of New Deal political subversions, energized by economic-financial-monetary monoply of the world's vast resources.

In his 1913 book, "Jews and Modern Capitalism," Economics Professor Werner Sombart, graphically epitomized thus: "Capitalism was born from the money loan; Jews made an art of lending money; they were taught early to look for their chief happiness in money; they fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords of Money—and Lords of the world."

That not only unmasked the Communist Plot to destroy The American Republic, but the world dominion aim of the ideological people today generally termed "International Jewry."

Later, I personally bought, with my own funds, other authentic English and French documents, which provided added confirmation.

When I reported back to the three patriots named, I was queried:

"Well, what are we going to do about it?"

"I don't know what you men are going to do" was the answer, "but I, as a publicity specialist, intend to start a non-profit patriotic exposure crusade

against Communism and its promoters to defend, protect and preserve our Constitutional Republic—with an independent editorial platform along the lines of the following:"

EDMONDSON EDITORIAL PLATFORM

Political, non-partisan, for Americanism First; Anti-Internationalism, and anti-Dictatorship, Communistic or Fascistic.

Financial, modestly independent, no entanglements.

Religion: a believer in Christian Principles, not a church member

Ancestry: Virginia-Maryland pre-Revolution native American, chiefly Scotch descent; born Dayton, Ohio, 1872.

Business career; Forry years of journalism as reporter, editor, author, publisher,

Ambition and Objective: Restoration of The Republic

Without ambition except to be of service to my country, I cater to no leadership complex. Believing that circumstances create and draft true leaders, I am ready to cooperate with any patriotic group not wasting time with effects. I follow no policy that takes account of fear and compromise. No important issue was ever won by cowardice or by suppressing truth. I am for free speech ballots, not Communistic bullets. Let the People know the Truth, they will Save The Republic. "Pitiless publicity is the cure for Public Evils!"

THE FOURTH ESTATE

Jewish power propaganda has accepted, applied and proved Irish Statesman Edmund Burke's historic tribute to the great power of the press when, during a 1780 session of the British Parliament, he dramatically turned and, pointing to the Reporters Gallery, said: "There is an Estate more potent than any! . . ."

He bore eloquent testimony to the maxim that "Pitiless Publicity is the cure for Public Evils," as did Voltaire when he epigrammatically exclaimed "Revolutions are made by the pamphleteer!" The logic of events indicates that Voltaire might have well added "and unmade" to that eulogy of "The Fourth Estate."

It will be noted by the reader that in his patriotic crusade reporting, upon encountering documents unauthenticated, such as the so-called "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," "Benjamin Franklin's anti-Jewish Prophecy," and other unauthenticated documents, the author hereof has been careful to treat them in accord with the basic principles of the Fourth Estate regarding rumors, gossip, etc., namely, as controversial data lacking confirmation but justifying a report as circulating news of live public interest. Also ultra-conservatism was exercised in handling documentation from Nazi, Fascistic or other sources which current propaganda had labeled as "prejudiced anti-Semitic matter." The whole truth has been assiduously cultivated to the best of this writer's ability, and when ascertained, he has presented it as clearly as possible, in the "language of vigor," logically convinced as to its reliability.

THE DEADLY PARALLEL

(Signed Bulletin of April 7, 1934, issued by Edmondson)

WHICH is more TRULY REPRESENTATIVE of American Institutions

This Group

ctical Americans who, under individual reward system, d United States prestige and

wealth to unequalled pre-eminence.

ATTERBURY, W. W., President Pennsyl

ALDRICH, Winthrop W., Chairman,

BRUERE, Henry, President, Bowery Savings Bank.

BUCKNER, Thomas A., President, New York Life Insurance Co., This List

Professors, Doctrinaires, et al, prominent National Administrators and Advisors, favoring policies antagonistic to American Traditions.

(Alphabetical)

BARUCH, Bernard M., "Unofficial President,"

BERLE, Prof. A. A. Jr., "Unofficial Advisor,"

BULLITT, W. C., U. S. Ambassador to Russia,

BRANDEIS, Louis D., "Braintrust God father,"

CORTELYOU, Geo. B., President, Consolidated Gas Co.,

DAVIS, John W., Former Democratic Presidential Candidate.

DAWES, Charles G., Former Republican

El.Y., Jos. B., Democratic Governor of Massachusetts.

FORD. Henry, Automobile Manufacturer. GLASS, Carter, Democratic Senator from Virginia.

GIFFORD, W. S., President, American

GRACE, E. G., President, Bethlehem Stee

HARRIMAN, H. I., Chairman U. S. Chamber of Commerce

HUGHES, Charles Evans. Chief Justice,

HARBORD, Gen. James G., Chairman, Radio Corp. of America.

JORDAN. Dr. Virgil P., President, National Industrial Conference Board.

KEMMERER, Prof. E. W., International Monetary Expert.

LINDBERGH, Col. Charles A., Famous American Aviator.

MORGAN, J. P., Great Republican Industrial Banker, given clean bill of health in Democratic Banking Investigation.

MELLON, Andrew, Noted Financier, reduced U.S. National Debt from 26 to 16 billion while Republican Secretary of U.S. Treasury,

RITCHIE. Albert C., Governor of Maryland, former Democratic Candidate for Presidency,

RAND, J. H., Jr., President, Remington-Rand,

SMITH, Alfred E., Former Democratic Candidate for President.

SPRAGUE, O. M. W., Professor. International Monetary System Expert,

SLOAN, A. P., Jr., President, General Motors Corp.,

SCHWAB, Charles M., Steelmaster,

TAYLOR, M. C., Chairman, U. S. Stee Corp.,

TEAGLE, W. C., President, Standard Oil of N. J.,

VANDERLIP, Frank A., Financier,

YOUNG, Owen D., Chairman, General Electric Co.,

WILLARD, Daniel, President, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad,

WADSWORTH, James W., Independent Republican Congressman,

WILLIAMSON, F. E., President, New

In all National crises, Washington, Lincoln and other great Presidents of the Republic enlisted America's distinguished practical patriots against enemies at home and

Why does the Roosevelt New Deal control discredit and deprive America of representative wisdom in its hour of supreme politico-economic distress?

Political Banktupt Leadership is the Poison of the People

COHEN, Benjamin, Stock Exchange Regulation Bill Co-Author,

EZEKIEL, Dr. Mordecai, AAA, "Farm Regimentation Co-Author,"

FILENE, E. A., "Unofficial Advisor,"

FRANKFURTER, Felix, "Unofficial Advisor," called "Karl Marx Professor,"

FFIS. Herbert, "the brains of the State

Dept.,"

FECHNER, Robert, Forest Army Head. FRANK, Jerome, AAA General Counsel, GOLDENWEISER, Dr. Emanuel, Federal Reserve Research Director,

Amal. Clothing Workers' Union Radical. HUNT, Henry, RFC, Ex Socialist Mayor, KIRSTEIN, Louis R., RFC Advisor, KOHN, Robert, PWA Special Advisor, LUBIN, Isador, Labor Statistics Director,

LILIENTHAL, David R., TVA Counsel, LANDAU, L. N., PWA General Solicitor, LANDIS, Prof. James M., FTC, Co-author Regulation Bill and Securities Act,

MORGENTHAU, Henry Sr., "Unofficial Advisor."

MARGOLD, Nathan R., Interior Dept.

MOLEY, Raymond, Prof., "Unofficial Favorite Advisor," Co-author Regulation Bill.

ROSENMAN, Samuel, "Unofficial Advisor," alleged creator of the "Brain Trust"

RICHBERG, Donald NRA Labor Counsel, SACHS, A., NRA Economic Advisor, SCHNEIDERMAN, Rose, Labor Advisory Board, noted New York Radical

SWOPE, Gerard, "Unofficial Advisor," SOBELOFF, Simon E. District Attorney

TAUSSIG, Prof. Albert E., NRA,

TUGWELL, Rex G., Asst. Secy. Agriculture, holds up Russian System as example for America.

UNTERMYER, Samuel, Stock Exchange Nemesis.

WARBURG, James P., "Unofficial Advisor."

WOLLMAN, Prof. Leo, Labor Radical, Neutral Member Labor Strike Board, WYZANSKI C. F. Labor Department

Solicitor.

(Many other consultants omitted for lack of space, including—in addition to Cabinet Counsellors Wallace, Morgenthau, Jr., Perkins, Farley, Ickes—"Advisors" Gov. Lehman, Basil Manley, Texas Banker Jesse Jones, H. J. Lasky, Gen. Johnson.

Robert Edward Edmondjon

The editorial reprinted below was received by Edmondson about April 10, 1934. It was re-published.

U. S. JEWISH F. D. R. BRAINTRUST

(As listed in reprint below from the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of October 20, 1933, Editor, Rabbi Gross)

PERHAPS the most pointed contrast between the lot of the Jews in Germany and the position of their co-religionists in the United States is afforded by comparing the Hitlerite government's policy of deliberately and ruthlessly eliminating from every phase of Germany's economic, industrial and cultural life those Jewish men and women of talent who have labored to make Germany great and respected, with that of the ROOSEVELT ADMINISTRATION WHICH HAS SELECTED MORE JEWS TO FILL INFLUENTIAL POSITIONS THAN ANY PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

In dealing with those Jews actively participating in framing and carrying out the New Deal legislation it will be simpler to separate them into three groups: those who were prominently identified with Roosevelt's fortunes before he became President; the members of the "brain trust;" and those who by sheer merit have found themselves drafted into the growing army of men and women helping the Roosevelt administration, in official or unofficial capacities, to instill new strength into the nation's economic life by means of the national recovery program.

Attention was first drawn to Roosevelt's close association with Jews long before he became President. During Mr. Roosevelt's first gubernatorial campaign in New York in 1928 he became acquainted with Samuel Rosenman, then a member of the State Bill Drafting Commission. Impressed with Rosenman's ability in gathering campaign material, Mr. Roosevelt appointed Rosenman his personal counsel. It was in the course of those relationships that Mr. Roosevelt came to appreciate Rosenman's judgment and he soon charged him with a multiplicity of confidential and responsible tasks. When Roosevelt elevated Rosenman to the Supreme Court he admitted he was "cutting off my right arm." That this was not idle flattery is evidenced by the fact that Judge Rosenman owns a photograph of Assistant Secretary of State Raymond Moley, which is inscribed "To Sam Rosenman, founder and head of the Brain Trust." The inscription aptly summarized Rosenman's service to Roosevelt because the now fatnous "brain trust" came into being during Roosevelt's years as governor. Even now Judge Rosenman is frequently called to Washington to consult with the President.

Rosenman was not the only Jewish advisor of Mr. Roosevelt while he was in Albany. Henry Morgenthau, Jr., who served as State Conservation Commissioner, was constantly called in by Governor Roosevelt for advice and help, and during the Presidential campaign Morgenthau did a great deal in mapping out the Rooseveltian appeal to the farmers and in drafting the Democratic party's agricultural plank. After March 4 President Roosevelt turned to Morgenthau as the logical candidate for the chairmanship of the Federal Farm Board, a position which clothes him with great authority under the recovery program. Mr. Morgenthau is also the generalissimo of the co-ordinated farm relief forces and a member of the Roosevelt "super-cabinet."

Another pre-election associate of Mr. Roosevelt was Jesse I. Straus, now ambassador to France. It was Mr. Straus who led the way in organizing the business men of the country behind Roosevelt's candidacy for the Presidency.

BARUCH 'UNOFFICIAL PRESIDENT'

One of the key Roosevelt advisors is Bernard M. Baruch, a power in the Wilson administration, who first came into the picture as an early Roosevelt supporter in the pre-convention days. It was Mr. Baruch who recommended the appointment of his former associates on the War Industries Board, General Hugh Johnson and George N. Peek, as administrators of the National Recovery Act and the Farm Relief Act, respectively. When former Assistant Secretary of State Moley went to London to keep an eye on the World Economic Conference President Roosevelt called Mr. Baruch into his administration as an advisor without portfolio. In assuming this position in the absence of Secretary of State Hull and the President from Washington, Mr. Baruch was regarded as the "unofficial President."

The second group of Jewish "New Dealers" is comprised of those who are members of the so-called "brain-trust," the body of youthful and liberal economists, technicians and professors upon whose expert counsel and experience the President has leaned heavily and drawn freely in framing the recovery projects. The Jewish members of this loosely-knit "kitchen cabinet" are James Paul Warburg, Herbert Feis, Charles W. Taussig, Emanuel Goldenweiser, Mordecai Ezekiel, Felix Frankfurter, Nathan Margold, Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Of the latter we have already spoken.

Professor Frankfurter, who has declined a number of important positions in the Roosevelt administration, has nevertheless had his recommendations accepted in filling nearly half a dozen of the most important legal posts in the government and continues to function as one of the President's most trustworthy advisors and a link between the liberalism of the Brandeis-La Follette era and the new Roosevelt liberalism. Two of his proteges are members of the "brain trust," Nathan Margold, solicitor for the Department of the Interior, and Charles Wyzanski, Jr., solicitor to the Department of Labor.

The remaining three members of the "brain trust" are veterans in the government service whose records of achievement led President Roosevelt to include them in his personal enteurage. The best known of this trio is Dr. Emanuel Goldenweiser, whose official title is director of the division of research and statistics of the Federal Reserve System.

Dr. Mordecai Ezekiel's highly specialized talents in various technical phases of agriculture have made him an invaluable member of the Rooseveltian inner circles which look to him for guidance in the development of practical methods of economic restabilization of farming, a major problem in the recovery program. Dr. Herbert Feis, referred to as "the brains of the State Department" by the Washington newspaper corps, is the diplomatic expert of the "brain trust."

The last group of Jews holding important positions under the Roosevelt administration is the largest and includes a number of well-known figures as well as some who are newcomers on the national scene. In the latter category are Robert Straus, personal assisant to General Johnson; Lloyd H. Landau, a St. Louis disciple of Professor Frankfurter, who is the general solicitor of the Public Works Board; Dr. Maurice Karp, dean of the Jewish School of Social Work, to whom has been assigned the task of training the personnel needed to carry out the National Recovery Act; Dr. Alexander Sachs, chief of General Johnson's research division and the man to whom the recovery administration turns for facts on the various codes; Robert Kohn, former president of the

American Institute of Architects, who is special advisor to the Cabinet Advisory Board of the Public Works Administration and in complete charge of plans and projects submitted for loans under the Public Works Act; Isador Lubin, former professor at the Brookings Institute in Washington, who heads the vitally important Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Department of Labor; David E. Lilienthal, former member of the Wisconsin Public Service Commission, who is a member of and counsel to the Tennessee Valley Authority for the development of the Muscle Shoals program; Jerome Frank, counsel for the administration of the agricultural relief bill, and Celeste Jedel, chief archivist of the American delegation to the World Economic Conference.

More prominent Jewish personalities are to be found on the various Industrial Recovery Boards. Sidney Hillman, president of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers' Union, and a veteran trade unionist and labor economist; Rose Schneiderman, founder and president of the Women's Trade Union League, and Dr. Leo Wolman, professor of economics at Columbia University, are members of the Labor Advisory Board, of which Dr. Wolman is chairman. Louis Kirstein, Boston merchant and philanthropist, and Gerard Swope, president of the General Electric Company, sit on the Industrial Advisory Board.

(COPIES 1c EACH at Edmondson Economic Service, 80 Washington St., N. Y. City. DELIVERED POSTPAID by Sealed Mail, 3 copies for 6c; 6 for 12c; 10 for 20c; 15 for 30c. Above 15 copies to 100, 1c each plus 15c prepaid express, 500 for \$5.50, express prepaid. Payable in "small" stamps, coins, dollar bills, checks or money orders.)

AMERICANISM DEFINED

Invited by "The Booster Club" of New York City about the middle of April to deliver before it an address on "Americanism," Editor Edmondson under date of April 24, 1934, spoke in part as follows:

"It is customary for speakers and writers to get auditors or readers into a good humor to make them receptive or to 'put something over,' but I have no ax to grind except an American Tomahawk, which is kept razor-edge in these perilous days. Good humor has no place in the grim job ahead of us. I would like to make all pro-Americans fighting mad—and they will be once they realize individually that sinister minority interests, seeking to control, have brought them face to face with politico-economic death.

'As this address is on 'Americanism' it is apropos to outline my conception thereof. I am for Americanism under the Constitution; for representative Government without selfish minority dictation; for Individual Liberty without license; for Equality of Opportunity, without predatory practices. Being pro-American, I am anti-Fascist, Anti-Communist and Anti-Socialist because they undermine Americanism.

"'We ain't seen nothin' yet' (to use the words of Gen. Hugh Johnson) if the Roosevelt trend to the 'Left' can't be stopped soon.

"Americans want no Communism! They need no Fascism! They desire no class warfare! They demand honest representative American government, administered by honorable Americans acting as their servants, public officials who will not be led astray by irresponsible, corrupt and selfish minorities. If we do not fight now, there may be nothing left to fight with or for."

That speech was broadcast throughout the Nation

MIS-REPRESENTATIVE MINORITY GOVERNMENT (Edmondson Bulletin dated April 23, 1934)

To Mr. David A. Brown, President Publisher, The American Hebrew, 212 Fifth Avenue, City:

Sir: Replying to yours of April 17: You say—as if such things were sacrilege: "On the face of it, these two documents ('Bankrupt Leadership' and 'The Deadly Parallel' issued by Edmondson Service) are an attack on the Roosevelt Administration * * * The Nazi Jew-baiting, Jew-hating groups in this country evidently see in this, definitely anti-Semitic propaganda furnished by one who purports to be an editor, an investment-economist, and designates himself to be absolutely independent * * * Just a casual analysis of these two lists proves beyond any question of doubt that whoever got them up deliberately and maliciously attempted to mislead the public, and to create the impression that Jews are in the majority of those whom you label: 'Bankrupt Leadership,' thereby attempting to poison the minds of the public * * * The circular * * * is an offensive attack upon the Administration and implies that the government is in control of those who would set up a communistic form of government, the main purpose of which is to attack the Stock Exchange bill * * * Aside from the fact that you have been guilty of a dis-service to the Roosevelt Administration, and, by innuendo, been guilty of a rank injustice to the Jews of this country, you have played into the hands of the Nazi and have made the very worst use of a service which is supposed to be an 'interpretation of events in finance-business-investment speculation' * * * We should be interested in knowing if you deliberately and with malice aforethought, sent out these destructive pieces of propaganda; and if it is with your approval that the Nazis in America are making use of this propaganda in their own interest."

First: This writer is pro-American, under the Constitution; for representative government, without selfish minority dictation; for individual liberty, without license; for equality of opportunity, with profit reward; for capitalistic economic freedom, minus predatory practices.

Being pro-American, this writer is anti-Fascist, anti-Communist and anti-Socialist, because these forces have been obviously subverting Americanism; and having threatened to destroy the very foundations of American Liberty, such minority elements face the righteous wrath of an outraged people.

Neither the writer nor his organization has been anti-Jewish, anti-Nazi, anti-Russian, anti-Irish or anti-German—and will not be so unless such minority elements speak or act anti-America. We want Americanism for the U. S.

Second, specifically replying: "Bankrupt Leadership" and "The Deadly Parallel" were written by this writer. They were intended as an "attack on the Roosevelt Administration." If that be treason to America, the majority and not a minority will "make the most of it." Minorities in this country seem unable to realize that Americans regard their officials as servants, not masters; holding deserved criticism of public policies a duty as well as a Constitutional right. In their minds, no aura of omnipotence hangs over Washington.

Third: If a pro-American veteran investment-economist, with an unimpeachable 30-year record of impartial service, cannot, from an independent American standpoint, analyze politico-economic developments for his clientele without being branded a "Jew-baiter" by an apparently representative source like yourself, then free speech, as well as representative governmnt, has been prostituted to zero, and the present 50 per cent "free" press will continue its commercialized funeral march.

Fourth: Certainly, with the gigantic job of American reconstruction demanding its exclusive attention, Americanism, forced to fight for self-preservation against irresponsible and selfish minorities actively conspiring for its downfall, manifestly cannot jeopardize its existence by dulling the edge of its defensive weapons out of consideration for quarreling bystanders.

Are you blind to the growing procession in the American daily press of prominent American men and women caustically denouncing the Roosevelt New Deal as socialistic, communistic, and un-American? Do you know that this writer editorially supported Mr. Roosevelt 100 per cent in the public press and privately until the President called for criticism last Fall?

Do you realize that instantaneous demand for reprinting and re-circulation by the tens of thousands, of "Bankrupt Leadership" and "The Deadly Parallel," with coast to coast patriotic commendation and no discordant recorded note except your own, obviously means that militant Americanism still lives.

Apparently some of the oppressed people who hopefully came to American shores during the last half-century, made welcome by American freedom, tolerance and generosity, have not yet contacted the militant Spirit of America—or they might prefer to play with explosives rather than with the dynamic patriotic forces now surging toward concert pitch throughout the nation on account of subversive minority activities.

You further say: "The Deadly Parallel," whether so intended or not, gives color to the claim of the Nazi anti-Semitic group in this country that the President is surrounded by Jews and that the New Deal is supposedly a Jew Deal." * * *

By the last phrase of your sentence above—you round out, clarify and bring this whole matter to an issue, in view of the following:

When pro-Americans have continually and offensively thrust upon their consciousness the unfair over-representation of Jews in the national "braintrust" advisory council; see the great number of Jewish names in Washington administrative bureaus; and read in the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933, a boastful reference to Bernard M. Baruch as "Unofficial President," and to Herbert Feis as "the brains of the State Department," is it surprising that the average citizen begins to ask if the five million Jewish minority is dominant in the national personal government, with 120,000,000 other people "forgotten;" and also, whether their "Moses" has not futilely led the nation long enough in a barren wilderness of trial and error.

As an illuminating geographical example of apparent "minority control," the so-called Roosevelt "brain-trust" personnel seems to largely over-represent New York, in comparison with the West and South, according to press, directory and other listings giving the following prominently mentioned official and unofficial "advisors" as being from that State:

Bernard M. Baruch, Prof. Adolf A. Berle, Jr., Judge Benj. Nathan Cardozo, Nathan M. Margold, Jerome Frank, Jesse I. Straus, Sidney Hillman, Robert Kohn, Isador Lubin, Henry Morgenthau, Sr. and Jr., Prof. Raymond Moley, Prosecutor Ferdinand Pecora, Samuel Rosenman, Alex. Sachs, Rose Schneiderman, Prof. Rex G. Tugwell, Samuel Untermyer, Prof. Leo Wolman, Prof. G. F. Warren, Gov. Herbert Lehman, Robert Straus, Frances Perkins, Benj. Cohen, Gerard Swope and others less prominent. Conspicuous Massachusetts "braintrusters" listed include Prof. James M. Landis, Edward A. I'ilene, Prof. Felix Frankfurter and Prof. Frank W. Taussig.

Now, as a practical demonstration of a Fair Deal, contrasted with a Raw Deal, since you yourself have crystallized the issue to a focus, I am laying this communication before the same clientele who received "Bankrupt Leadership" and "The Deadly Parallel," so that the record may be complete, for their information, consideration and verdict—with the following answer to your closing query, which characteristically puts race above country: Obviously, petty malice has no place in a life and death struggle to save American Constitutional Liberty.

Robert Coward Edmond fon

"A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH

In the interest of continuity, documentary data in connection with "Operation David A. Brown" is submitted below out of chronological order:

On May 8, 1934, I received another letter from Mr. Brown saying in part: "It is the opinion of myself and my associates that your writings would bear investigation, and we are sending literature to the Department of Justice, so that they may scrutinize it in detail."

Upon which Editor Edmondson in response, publicly commented: "That is O.K. If the time shall come when an American patriot is jailed for preaching Americanism, then he would rather be inside than out among 'free' slaves."

Inspectors of the Department of Justice called later and finding that the Editor was exercising his Constitutional rights of Free Speech, did not in any way censure his activities.

Under date of May 10, 1934, an additional letter was received from Mr. Brown, reading in part:

"You may be interested in knowing that I have a complete file on you. This file tells in substance your newspaper and financial history, and not only GIVES YOU A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH, but shows that there is nothing in your previous history to match the poisonous documents (on Jewish anti-Americanism) that you have sent out."

EDMONDSON BROWN CONFERENCE

In the latter half of May Mr. Brown telephoned Edmondson asking if he was agreeable to a conference. A conference was arranged for May 24, 1934, at Horn's Restaurant in lower N. Y. City: Brown being accompanied by the American Hebrew's Managing Editor, and Edmondson by John T. Mills, hereinbefore mentioned. A shorthand memorandum made by Edmondson at the time contains the following:

Mr. Brown said: "The Jew is a capitalist. Why would be support Communism?"

"If the long distance objective of the Jews, as 'Chosen People,' is ultimate world control, he would use Communism as a means to an end," was the answer.

"Pooh! Pooh!" ejaculated Mr. Brown. He denied that there was "a Jewish minority;" but was stumped when Mr. Edmondson pointed out that Jews wouldn't "melt;" he having just spoken of "Jewish solidarity."

"I have lived in all parts of this country," remarked Mr. E. Interrupting, Mr. Brown said; "I know it—and your record is as clean as a hound's tooth."

Mr. E. went on to say that the tide was rising against Roosevelt Leadership and the hidden Jewish Radical element.

"Pooh! Pooh!" was again the non-answer.

The Brooklyn Jewish Examiner editorial of Oct. 20, 1933, was then produced—and Mr. Brown exploded. It was like a red rag to a bull. He said the paper was going to be "wiped out"—inferentially by the Jews themselves. He added "It was all wrong!"

"What do you want us Jews to do-get out of Washington?"

"IT WOULD BE A GOOD THING!" I remarked. But he waved that aside and commented that "after all, the heads of the government is the place to hit."

"That's why I've been attacking and centering on Roosevelt Bankrupt Leadership," was the reply.

Mr. Brown admitted: "Roosevelt is responsible; the government will stand or fall with him."

He then strongly advised me not to "get tangled up with the Nazis, who are using your publications."

"If I get out hot stuff and they use it, how can I help it?", I asked.

Finally, Mr. Brown solemnly warned: "WE ARE GOING TO BRING A WAR ON GERMANY!"

World War Two on Germany started five years later in 1939.

THE REAL ISSUE

(Edmondson Broadcast Bulletin of May 11, 1934)

The following correspondence is published as a clarification.

Letter of May 6, 1934, from Louis A. Freedman, 33 Riverside Drive, N. Y. City to Robert Edward Edmondson:

The implications of anti-Semitism in your correspondence with Mr. David A. Brown and the open summons in the pamphlet mentioned to a campaign against the Jews, show that you are beginning to inject an issue which is in flat contradiction to your professed Americanism. You insist, properly, that our Constitution be respected by the government, and yet you are calling on everybody to violate one of its most important protective clauses as regards human rights—that forbidding race discrimination.

"Into the American melting-pot have been thrown many races, who have all been equally welcomed, and to whom the same rights and opportunities have been accorded. Members of every race have abused these privileges. The Irish have played a most unsavory role in corruption in municipal and state politics but shall a pogrom be launched to exterminate the Irish because so many who have attained office have been criminal grafters? Bootleggers, forgers and gorillas have come plentifully from among the Italians. Are the millions of Italian citizens to be dumped into the ocean? Shall we sweep the country clean of them all, good, bad and indifferent?

"Killing off 5,000,000 Jews because several dozen of them are in Washington in key positions, where, incidentally, they have been placed by the elected representatives of the American people, may seem to those who are inspired by the 'noble' German experiment, to be an expeditious way of getting rid of all America's troubles; but let these apostles of a new kind of New Deal not call this an act of pro-Americanism. Why, however, stop them? If wholesale massacre is the way to restore the American Constitution and give us back the

country of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, let such American 'patriots' revive the Ku-Klux Kian in all its pristine glory, ride through the countryside in white sheets and kill and burn Negroes, Catholics, non-Aryans and any and all races, tribes, creatures which pollute this pure soil!

"So, at bottom, your campaign would seem to be merely an American mask to hide a hideous, anti-Semitic face, and this calling of Americans to awake an echo of Hitler's call to Germany to Nazify itself.

"If, however, you are a real American of the true and best American tradition, you will not convert your campaign into one of preaching race-hatred, and incidentally raking up old lies, which you know are lies, only for the sake of making the mob-hatred even more venomous. To be true to the Americanism you profess, make it a clean fight against the government octopus that is sucking up our liberties and our Constitutional rights; but if you degrade it to a fight against the Jews, it is you who will appear as the emissary of the true enemy—Germany."

NOT A HATE CRUSADE

Reply thereto by Edmondson as below, under date of May 11, 1934:

My campaign is for Americanism, and not against minorities who put country above race or association, whoever they may be. It so happens that, in my opinion—which obviously agrees with your own—there is a Jewish minority in key positions at Washington.

My American politico-economic philosophy comprises no futile racehatred or anti-Jew persecutions. This writer has raked up no lies, old or new. He has merely dramatized the record.

My signed articles are based on records such as that of the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner article of October 20, 1933—now supplemented by your own admission that there are Jews in "Washington key positions," who, with others, must therefore form your "government octopus that is sucking up our liberties." Why befog the issue by pointing out the political "octopus," and then refusing to admit or expose its Jewish minority makeup?

You properly point out that Washington key position Jews were "placed by elected representatives of the people"—Roosevelt Leadership. My criticisms have been unceasingly aimed at such leadership to hold it to strict account.

The writer is earnestly directing whatever ability he may possess to prevent, not promote, the reported violence you fear. He sincerely believes that if the United States Jewish minority will do its American duty it will achieve its own salvation by putting country first.

Guided by many years' experience in the independent journalistic field, this writer is convinced that America's First Line of Defence—the Constitutionally guaranteed free press—is being subverted politically through legislative, administrative and propaganda acts made possible by Washington minority over-representation, supplemented by economic reprisals through advertising channels. Such an outrageous condition prevents the American majority from learning the truth about policies undermining American institutions.

Arguing that other minorities have abused American privileges, you say: 'Into the American melting-pot have been thrown many races,' including the Jews. But the record, as I read it, is that the Jews do not "melt;" and they seem unable as a class to think, during crises, in terms of America First, but only in terms of "international race consciousness."

In defence of Americanism, this writer would take exactly the same position as herein outlined, were the present Jewish influence exercised by the German group minority, the Irish minority, the Russian minority or any racial, religious or other minority group in the United States. Any minority element seeking to rule the American majority will fail. There is no clause in the Constitution "forbidding race discrimination," except as to the ballot.

YOUR concern is for the 5,000,000 Jews in the United States—MINE is for 125,000,000 citizens, including the Jewish minority. Which is TRUE Americanism?

Rober + Edward Edmond for

Below is a signed Edmondson publication of July 4, 1934.

FRANKFURTER—THE SPEARHEAD OF THE "BRAINTRUST"

The soaring ambition of Prof Felix Frankfurter of Harvard University is evidently responsible for the persistent report that he is to be appointed to the U. S. Supreme Court—which would then, with three Jewish Justices, be 33-1/3% Jewish, whereas the entire United States Jewish minority is but 4% of the total population.

Does the record of this alien-born radical qualify him?

Born in Vienna, Austria, in 1882; admitted to the American Bar in 1905; made Assistant to Secretary of War Baker; appointed Counsel to President Wilson's Mooney Mediation Commission; nominated in 1932 for the Massachusetts Supreme Court but defeated by 500,000 protesting petitioners—Frankfurter has never been elected to any important political office, gaining access to inner Government circles by appointive influence.

Listed by the Industrial Defence Assn. of Boston as having been associated with seven subversive organizations, for more than thirty years devoting his talents largely to defending notorious Radicals and Communists, the "Red" murderers Sacco and Vanzetti and a criminal organization like the I. W. W.—has not Frankfurter. by such environment, acquired a "cultural background"

diametrically opposed to the traditions of the American Judiciary:

He is named as a member of the National Committee of the American Civil Liberties Union, which is graphically described thus in House of Repre-

rentatives Record Report 2200 of January 17, 1931.

"The American Civil Liberties Union is closely affiliated with the Communist movement in the U.S., and fully ninety per cent of its efforts are on behalf of Communists who have come in conflict with the law * * * It is quite apparent that the main function of the ACLU is to attempt to protect Communists in their advocacy of force and violence to overthrow the United States Government."

President Wilson appointed a "Mediation Commission" to bring about the release of Communist "Tom Mooney," who was sentenced to imprisonment in California for bombing a 1916 Preparedness Day parade, killing 10 and injuring 50 persons. Frankfurter was appointed Counsel of the Commission, and tried to enlist the influence of former President Theodore Roosevelt to aid Mooney. The ex-president scathingly rebuked Frankfurter in a letter of Dec. 19, 1917, as follows:

"Thank you for your frank letter. I answer it at length because you have taken and are taking * * * an attitude which seems to me to be fundamentally that of Trotsky and the other Bolsheviki leaders in Russia; an attitude which

may be fraught with mischief to this country * * *

"I have just received your report on the Bisbee deportation * * * Your report is as thoroughly a misleading document as could be written on the subject. No official writing on behalf of the President is to be excused for failure to know and clearly set forth that the I.W.W. is a criminal organization

"Here again you are engaged in excusing men precisely like the Bolshevik in Russia, who are murderers and encouragers of murder, who are traitors to their allies, to democracy and to civilization, as well as to the United States and whose acts are nevertheless apologized for on grounds, my dear Mr

Frankfurter, substantially like those which you allege."

"MORE THAN ANY OTHER ONE PERSON FRANKFURTER IS THE LEGAL MASTER-MIND OF THE NEW DEAL," say Simon and Schuster in their 1934 edition of "The New Dealers," adding: "Franklin D. Roosevelt has been heard to say that the only man in the world who can give him mental indigestion is Frankfurter. His intimacy with him dates back to the Wilson Administration.

"When Wallace and Tugwell planned their new farm administration, they asked Frankfurter to recommend a solicitor for the Department of Agriculture. He suggested Jerome N. Frank. When the first draft of the Securities Bill was practically wrecked, Moley sent for Frankfurter to rewrite it. Felix brought down Prof. Landis and Ben Cohen. When the TVA was organized and needed a smart lawyer, Frankfurter produced David Lilienthal. For Miss Perkins he produced Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., and Secretary Hull found waiting for him in the State Department another Frankfurter economic protege in the shape of Herbert Feis. Thus are Frankfurter men established in key posts throughout the Administration"—estimated to total hundreds, most of them from Jewish-Radical circles.

Endowed with a tremendous intellectual vitality, a prodigious memory, a legal mastermind and the tact and ability to teach Presidents, can there be any doubt about Prof. Frankfurter's brilliant and commanding mental power to inculcate, with appallingly subversive effect, the poisonous germs of fatal fallacies and false doctrines in the credulous and open mind of American Youth, coming leaders of the nation?

Apparently High Priest of the misrepresentative Jewish-Radical national political-minority leadership that has been undermining the American System of Government and its Free Press Guardian, by Machiavellian legal artifice, misleading propaganda and economic subversion, WOULD IT NOT BE TREASONABLY NEGLIGENT AND PERFECTLY SUICIDAL, IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING DAMNING FACTUAL RECORD, FOR AMERICANS TO PERMIT THIS ALIEN-BORN AND ALIEN-MINDED JEW COMMONLY CALLED "COMMUNIST KARL MARX PROFESSOR," TO BE ELEVATED TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, THE CUSTODIAN OF THE CONSTITUTION AND BULWARK OF AMERICAN LIBERTIES—THEREBY INDIRECTLY ENDOWING A FOREIGN BOLSHEVISTIC FOE WITH SUPERLATIVE AUTHORITY TO COMPLETE OUR DESTRUCTION?

"THE COMMUNISTIC JEW DEAL"

As Seen by Congressman Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania (Signed Edmondson broadcast Nov. 1, 1934)

Kept from the American people by the sinister Jewish Communistic power that controls our press, lie buried in the 1933-4 Congressional Record important knowledge vital to the destinies of the U.S. It is in speeches as per extracts below of a courageous sterling patriot who is master of the Jewish Question, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, one of the few Representatives endorsed by both Republican and Democratic constituencies—Con-

gressman Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania:

"There has not been an administration since our advent into the great World War in which Bernard M. Baruch has not been a chief political, economic and financial advisor, and every administration that has listened to him has carried us deeper and deeper into financial chaos."

"When Treasury Secretary Morgenthau obtains his 'kitty' (this is what I am told he called the proposed two billion stabilization fund), American

funds will be fed to Europe more expeditiously and with less secrecy."

"Henry Morgenthau is related by marriage to Herbert Lehman, Jewish governor of New York; and by marriage or otherwise to the Seligmans of the International Jewish banking firm of J. & W. Seligman. It is not by accident, is it, that a representative and a relative of the money Jews of Wall St. and foreign parts has been elevated?"

Is it not true that in the United States today the Gentiles have the 'slips

of paper' while the Jews have the gold and lawful money?

"This 'kitty' bill makes of Henry Morgenthau a central bank, an institution which Jefferson declared is one of deadly hostility to the free institutions of the U. S. It slides into his hands the emergency powers which Congress granted to the President."

"Congressman Dickstein said in a radio address in Chicago over WENR on March 18, 1934: 'We Americans must change our law to make it possible for them (German Communistic Jews) to come here at once.'

"There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this country has fallen into the hands of the international money changers.

Why should the fact be hidden?"

"An attempt to establish a politico-economic plan is now in operation in England. It is designated 'Freedom and Planning.' May I suggest the similarity of the scheme to the NRA, Bankhead cotton bill, control of farm acreage, and other developments of the New Deal? It is the Jewish Plan of a world state."

Editor Edmondson was summoned to appear before the House un-American Activities Committee, to answer questions by Congressman Samuel Dickstein of New York, but on the day prior to that set for examination he was notified that his testimony was not desired.

Having prepared politico-economic points for exhaustive questioning, and feeling that such important testimony should not be wasted, on Oct. 18, 1934, he signed and broadcast the following "questionnaire testimony."

THE DICKSTEIN FARCE

What is your business?

Writing analytical investment interpretation of the general trend of politico-economic events.

You issued an "Invisible Government" bulletin recently, giving a list of "Jewish-

Radicals surrounding far. Roosevelt. What is your conception of Radical?

One who by speech, action or association is connected with Communists. Bolshevists. Red Socialists or Revolutionaries. In that sense, everyone named in said "Invisible Government" chart is a radical, including Mr. Roosevelt.

What do you understand by the term "Un-American Activity?"

Any man or group, such as Jewish Communists, speaking or acting against American constitutional majority representative principles, or who may be associated with those who do, is un American, in my opinion.

You have stated that Jewish Leadership has been un American. Give example. The Jewish boycott against Germany imposing great financial loss on the U. S.

Do you not believe that "Hitler atrocities" justify such a boycott?

I do not accept at face value or credit such information from publicity channels, since they are Jewish-dominated, in my opinion.

Can you give further illustrations of Jewish un Americanism?

Subversion of American press, radio and screen through ownership, advertising influence or misleading propaganda; Jewish New Dealer communistic laws and administration in NRA and AAA; Jewish promotion of Communistic New York meetings and parades, predominantly Jewish; distranchisement of New York 80 per cent Gentile population by Jewish monopoly of all important gubernatorial candidates.

Furhermore, I believe this Committee itself to be un-American because it has apparently exceeded and farcically prostituted its authority from being a Committee of Investigation to pro-Jewish Minority sub-Committees of Inquisition and Espionage of Americans doing patriotic duty-practically ignoring manifest communistic subversions.

In my opinion, Mr. Roosevelt is un-American because he has given aid and comfort of enemies of representative American government by permitting minority usurpation at Washington.

Are you not subverting constitutional guarantees by being anti-Jewish, considering be religious freedom provision?

No. This is a plant politico-economic issue, not a religious matter. The Constitution does not forbid citizens to detend it and their liberties against enemes within the state who are apparently trying to overthrow it under cover of religion. By thus prostituting religion for materialistic ends. Jewish leadership puts itself outside the Constitution.

What is your solution of the Jewish Problem?

Unless the Jewish minority voluntarily repudates its anti-American radical leadership and puts Americanism first, I believe the American majority should "vote and buy Gentile:" limit Jews to their population percentage in public affairs; force them to relinquish domination of U, S, economic life; and eliminate their influence from publicity channels.

My conception of fairness in connection with the Jews is to demand from as well as to give to them a fair deal on the ground that justice must be mutual to be righteous. Jewish Jurisprudence and American Jurisprudence, Jewish Economics and American Economics, being respectively Oriental and Occidental, are antagonistic, and will not mix any more than East will melt into West. Such an invasion of American law during the past three decades under the flood of alien immigration, makes it almost impossible for patriotic citizens to get justice from pro-Jew channels, let alone a Fair Deal.

Do you favor having Gentiles get rid of the Jewish people in the United States by

killing them?

No more than I do the slaughtering of 20,000,000 Gentiles in Russia.

The preservation of priceless American Constitutional liberties is worth any sacrifice.

Correspondence extracts below between James P. Warburg, New York Jew, of the well-known Warburg International Banking Family, and Robert Edward Edmondson, are among the most important and enlightening Jewish Problem data published by him.

WARBURG "ENDORSEMENT"

Dear Mr. Edmondson:

There has been brought to my attention a circular letter which you mailed to your subscribers on Oct. 9, in which you make certain statements about my father, the late

It is not the purpose of this letter to take issue with your general statements concerning Jews, nor to attempt to dissuade you from what is apparently a deep-rooted prejudice. I am concerned here only with the statements you have made about my father, because they are untrue and cast an entirely unfair reflection upon a man who is no longer here to defend himself.

I join with you in condemning any Iew or Gentile who fosters ideas or theories or

practices subversive to the traditional American order.

I have wandered a little from the main purpose of this letter, which was to set you right about my father. As a rule. I pay no attention to wholesale attacks upon Jews or any other group because it is my belief that usually such attacks by their very nature answer themselves.

Very truly yours.

(Signed) JAMES P. WARBURG

REPLY BY MR. EDMONDSON

Dear Mr. Warburg:

Yours of Dec. 4. I appreciate and sympathize with your filial desire to submit your record of your father's banking activities, and take pleasure in publishing and laying relevant before the submit when I mailed my pumphlat for their consideration and judgement

If you will carefully re-read my pamphlet of Oct. 9 you will see that I do not, as you say, "make statements about your father," but quoted from a published printed

record, apparently genuine even though the identity of the author may be unknown to you. Surely an analyst may fairly allude to such data without "adopting" debatable pre-

nises, when reporting associated developments.

You accuse me of holding a "deep-rooted prejudice" in being anti-Jewish. The Standard Dictionary defines "prejudice" as "pre-judgement" without due examination. My present active pro-American attitude was adopted about eight months ago after exhaustive impartial investigation and consideration that indicated active U. S. Jewish-Radical leadership to be dangerously anti-American.

Therefore, with absolute politico-economic religious independence, I have no prejudice, deep or otherwise, in this connection. But I am glad to have your personal assurance in conference, that you are convinced of my "honesty of patriotic purpose" in

this crusade. Patriotic "prejudice" has in the past been deemed a virtue,

My "militant opposition" has not been "wholesale," as you imply, but discriminat-

ing and specifically against "false leadership," which you yourself discredit

Your declaration: "I JOIN YOU IN CONDEMNING ANY JEW OR GENTILE WHO FOSTERS IDEAS OR THEORIES OR PRACTICES SUBVERSIVE OF THE TRADITIONAL AMERICAN ORDER," is tantamount to a blanket endorsement of

practically every general premise I have implicated in my pamphlets.

Therefore, I deeply regret that so prominent a Jew as yourself cannot "wander a little further" from the personal "main purpose" of writing your letter to clear a family record, into individual leadership in a vastly more vital and general field. My compatriots and I would have been glad if you could have seen fit to follow your expressed "condemnation" of subversive Jewish-Radical elements with practical aggressive public action, something like my own, for a sound solution of the admittedly momentous Jewish "Red" Problem; for we have not seen any specific public denunciation by you of the energizing Jewish Communism that is dangerously menacing American Liberties—a high duty patriotic Jews owe the country which you yourself have admitted to me has done more than any other for Jewty.

American politics MUST NOT be ruled by Minority Power; American Economics MUST NOT be subject to Minority Monopoly of any kind; The Press, Radio and Screen, incarnate bulwark of American Freedom, MUST and SHALL BE FREE.

These are times when Principles dwarf Personalines. We are caught up in the vast sweep of a cosmic movement. Who can stop such a mighty momentum? But those of us who understand, may to some degree directly influence its implications, provided courageous selflessness governs motive and action.

Yours for Americanism First.

Robert Coward Edmon for

I received a message from James P. Warburg, in which it was suggested that we hold a conference on "Americanism." He asked me to come to his palatial home on Fifth Avenue; but I told him that such would be unethical, under existing circumstances, and recommended the cocktail lounge of the Plaza Hotel in the neighborhood, where we could each pay for his own drinks.

We met. The preliminary was a remark by Mr. Warburg: "In this conference, Mr. Edmondson, I want you to understand that I am a loyal Jew." That seemed to me to be a bad start, for we were to discuss Americanism, and the implication was that Mr. Warburg put his loyalty to Jewry before his

obligations to Americanism.

Mr. Warburg told me how much he hated Communism, admitting, incidentally, that he knew many Jews were Communists. I asked for the percentage, and he replied that it was not quite as high as the 85% claimed. He admitted the crisis was pressing, and said America had done more for Jews than any other country, and he wanted to know what he could do in the matter. I suggested that in my judgement, the best procedure would be for him as a Jewish leader, to conduct a public campaign against Communism just as I was in a Gentile movement against it.

"Oh, My God, I can't do that" he ejaculated, without giving any specific

reason for such attitude.

He said he didn't like what was going on at Washington, and spoke against Frankfurter, Morgenthau and Brandeis.

Mr. Warburg said he was convinced of the honesty of my patriotic purpose.

But the interview ended fruitlessly.

Later, he sent Norman Beasely, his press agent, to my office one Saturday afternoon, where, during a long conference at which my wife was present, Beasley said he wanted to make us "love Jimmy Warburg."

My wife ejaculated "Why should we love Jimmy Warburg?"
He said: "He's a fine fellow, and I don't want to see him hurt."

Puzzled, I asked: "Hurt, how come?"

Beasley then admitted: "There may be a mass-march by indignant Americans on Washington to clean up this Communist mess."

Quickly I questioned: "Does Mr. Warburg fear that?"

Beasley replied: 'He does.'

ADDENDA

The following was printed in Chapter E, Page 117, of the 1928 book entitled "Walther Rathenau, His Life & Work" by Count Harry Kessler, published by Harcourt, Brace & Co.

"Three Hundred Men, all acquainted with each other,' wrote Rathenau in 1909 in an article in the Christmas number of the New Free Press (Vienna)

control the economic destiny of the (European) Continent.

"He himself was one of the 300. He was associated at the time with 8-

(Rathenau was a prominent Jew of Germany who, like Otto Kahn in the United States, sought to solve the Jewish Problem by assimiliation, but, being opposed by disagreeing tribal leadership, and not credited as sincere by Gentiles, he returned to the Jewish fold. Which was also done by Otto H. Kahn and also, later, by James P. Warburg, who denounced Roosevelt, and then voted for him later.)

"TRUE OR FALSE?"

Confessing Jewish subversions in the Franciscan Monastery of New York City in the fall of 1934, addressing Rev. Peter B. Duffee and myself, Morris Gordin, son of a Chicago Rabbi and a "former Communist," cried dramatically:

"I can hear the footsteps of the pall-bearers carrying my people out of

America!"

CAPITALIST-JEWS BACKING COMMUNISTS?

Following are extracts from "America's Great Menace" by B. A. M. Schapiro, Hebrew-Christian Publication Society, New York, N. Y., (1934):

"The time has come when the patriotic Jews of America should begin to feel the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) planned and hatched in the camp of Israel.

"Communism is tryranny worse than that of the Czarist regime * * *
The Bolshevik Revolution was first hidden, rooted and started in Leningrad and Moscow, and thence hurled itself on the remainder of Russia. It is starting in exactly the same way here and now.

"I meet Communists in their hunting grounds, Union Square (New York). How will you start the revolution here in America, I ask them in their own language. Do you not think that ultimately the government will wake up and

make what you are doing illegal?

"Then we Communists will work underground, and use the same methods that brought about the Russian Revolution by ASSASSINATING the government officials and scaring the others to death. We will plant cells in their fashionable clubs and their homes—POISON THEIR FOOD. Did we not do so in Russia, and succeed?"

"At a mass meeting in New York City commemorating the anniversary of the death of Lenin, there were nearly 25,000 present. There were not 500 Gentile faces in that mob.

"Jews ask prayers for their co-religionists in Russia; but why don't these Jews in their comfortable pews on Fifth Avenue and Riverside Drive take the old Testament and the Prayer Book and visit their deluded Communistic brethren and convert them to Jehovah and the Republic BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE?

"Our coffers are full, our homes palatial, our synagogues rise, our hospitals multiply. Never has Israel so increased in wealth.

"Demonstrations such as are often resorted to by Communist leaders and their dupes, will soon exhaust the patience of tolerant Americans and create in them a spirit of hatred against all Jews, the like of which has never been seen, for we have become an IRRITATION to our American neighbors.

"The American people are long suffering to a fault, BUT THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY MEN OF ACTION, practical men, and surely America's participation in the World War has shown what Americans can do when once aroused to the conviction that their forbearance has been abused.

"Let no Jew who reads these words accuse me of trying to ingratiate myself with 'anti-Semites.' The baptismal font has not lessened the love I cherish for my people, but because I have a dual perspective, being a Jew by birth and race and at the same time a Christian by faith, I believe I can help my people, especially since the Rabbis ignore what is ailing us, while the Christian ministry is silent, FEARING TO TOUCH THE JEWISH PROBLEM."

1935 ADDENDA

The following confession was published by Edmondson Oct. 1, 1935:

"THIS IS OUR GREAT DANGER IN AMERICA: Anti-Semites who find a common ground for unified action against us, SUCH AS COMMUNISM, will encounter only a tissue paper opposition resisting them."—New York Jewish Daily Bulletin of Nov. 28, 1934.

A WARNING INTERVIEW

While I was absent one day from my office in 1934, a Jew and a Gentile, allegedly representing the U. S. Chamber of Commerce to solicit membership, made a call. The Gentile would ask a question, then look up quickly at his companion for approval. He took the Edmondson Service to task for publishing a bulletin captioned "Blame Roosevelt," exposing the New Deal.

My wife informed him that I was exercising my constitutional right of free speech, and that we believed Franklin D. Roosevelt was a "traitor to The Republic;" that the time would come when the American people would recognize that fact; that he would ultimately be the most hated President the country ever had.

The Jew commented: "You, as his wife, should realize that the kind of work he is doing puts him in a dangerous position."

She retorted: "Robert Edward Edmondson can't be bought and he can't be scared. He is going to keep on with his patriotic work single-handed, if necessary. I quote to you Patrick Henry: 'Is life so sweet or peace so dear as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?'"

The lew turned around and left the office without a word.

My wife did not sleep for many nights, fearing she had been too outspoken; but audacity was precisely the right attitude, for subversive Jews fear personal initiative and high courage.

JUSTICE BRANDEIS UNFIT?

On March 15, 1935, an Edmondson bulletin was published under the above heading, reading:

Louis Dembitz Brandeis of Massachusetts, aged 79, is Jewish Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Wilson appointee, confirmed after long opposition in the Senate.

In 1930 there appeared on the market a book entitled "The Social and Economic Views of Mr. Justice Brandeis." The publishers printed a pamphlet in which this appears: "Brandeis' ideas have been slowly changing social thought * * * For the past fifty years he has gone quietly about his business * * * to give his country a new social order—a plan now being enlarged by our New Dealers to embrace the whole country."

The Jewish-owned New York Times of Jan. 28, 1934, confessed: "The underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy of Justice Brandeis. The Recovery Program is almost a composite of his dissenting opinions."

The following appears in the "Foreword" of "Other People's Money," by Brandeis: "Back in the time when Lenin was riding the revolution and was a symbol of it a friend said to Justice Brandeis: "If you had the power to determine the treatment the world should give to Lenin, what would be your course?" Brandeis replied: 'I WOULD GIVE HIM EVERYTHING HE WISHES. It is the only way to dispose of him."

Here is the record regarding Commonwealth College at Mena, Ark., which has been under investigation by the Arkansas Legislature as "communistic and subversive." A New York Herald Tribune recent dispatch referred to it as "A Free Love College." "Two of the prominent financial supporters of this institution are Justice Brandeis of the Supreme Court and Mrs. Brandeis," said the November, 1930, issue of "The National Republic."

"NEXT COMMUNIST PRESIDENT OF U.S."

(On April 1, 1935, the exposure below was published by Edmondson under the above heading:)

Carveth Wells, author of "Kapoot," Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society and the American Geographical Society, member of the Explorer's Club of New York City, wrote Col. E. N. Sanctuary of New York City, March 9, 1935, as follows:

"At the time of my visit to Russia, the Presidental campaign of 1932 was in full swing over here.

"In many places in Russia I saw large cartoons of Mr. Hoover entitled The Fathead in The White House," and beside them very flattering portraits of Mr. Roosevelt entitled THE NEXT COMMUNIST PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

"At the time the names of Bullitt and Tugwell were unknown to me, so that I was puzzled when young Communist guides asked me when Comrade Tugwell was going to have Russia recognized, and said Comrade Bullitt was going to be the first ambassador. Future events showed that the young Communists of Russia knew more about American politics than I did."

Elizabeth Dilling says in her "Roosevelt Red Record" that "Both Communist and Socialist Parties demanded U. S. recognition of the Soviet Union, self-styled 'base of world revolution.' Roosevelt invited its ex-bandit representative, Litvinoff (finkelstein) to the White House to be entertained with honors, AND RECOGNIZED THE SOVIET NOVEMBER 16, 1933."

AN APPEAL TO AMERICAN MANHOOD

Under the caption above, on April 15, 1935, Edmondson broadcast a signed call and appeal as below:

To One Hundred Million American Freemen:

Now is the time to lend every possible financial and other support to a self-less PRO-American Crusade with no racket to serve or complex to nurse—(1) One that is consecrating directly to campaign expense, every dollar received; (2) That KNOWS the great peril the nation is facing, and the real remedy therefor; (3) That has demonstrated capacity to face facts in the raw, without fear or favor; (4) That is attacking the Cancerous Cause instead or its radiating Symptoms, and has achieved vitally important coast to-coast results in less than a year; (5) That has concrete practical constructive plans which, adequately financed, properly focused and boldly executed, cannot fail to overthrow an alien-admitted "tissue-paper resistance," and restore representative Constitutional Government; (6) Whose crusade contemplates EXACT JUSTICE for Gentile and Jew.

"Trustees of Great Wealth," amassed through the operation of the natural law of "increasing returns," sit supinely and blindly inert while the "backbone" of the nation dies by inches in a sinister attrition, oblivious to the fact that if the Communism they may hope to defeat by a do-nothing policy, shall pass on, they might face confiscation by an outraged middle class who hold that such riches were bestowed as a trust for the salvation of America in time of peril.

Why longer dally with a danger that may flame into civil war?

Let us strike now like men, with the full patriotic power of never-defeated America, at the CAUSE of Communism and its ballyhooing dupes.

If you can't afford to contribute cash, be a Paul Revere and personally broadcast the deadly peril—by spoken and written word.

The evangelical fervor of aroused American public opinion, in an invincible self-preservation crusade, will liberate the subsidized "great power of the press" and smash this "Cross of Gold."

Are Americans to be Slaves or Masters in their own House?

"JERSEY GOES JEWISH!"

The exclamation of a well-known New York lawyer supplied the above caption over an April 15, 1935 Edmondson publication after hearing that Governor Hoffman of New Jersey had signed "racial-religious" Assembly Act 257, "repealing" Section 5, Article 1, of the State Constitution guaranteeing to all citizens "free speech liberties."

Here is a composite of the new law signed April 8, 1935: Any person or organization who shall utter any speech or declaration, or have in his possession for the purpose or with intent to utter, give away, circulate by exhibiting, or by radio, to the view of another person, any statement, speech, pronouncement or printed or multigraphed matter, or emblem, photograph, banner or flag, which, in any way, in any part thereof, tends to promote or promotes or incites hostility, hatred or violence against any group or persons residing or being in this state—by reason of race, color, religion or manner of worship, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine of \$200 to \$5,000 or a 90-day or 3-year imprisonment.

If there is any doubt as to the Jewish origin of this Jersey abortion, the following special dispatch to the New York Jewish Daily Bulletin from Trenton, N. J., April 10, 1935, will clarify the atmosphere: "Jewish leaders in New Jersey were highly elated today over the new anti-Nazi law approved last night by Governor Hoffman, prohibiting the dissemination of ANTI-JEWISH propaganda throughout the state."

1941 ADDENDA

The Rafferty Act of New Jersey, prohibiting anti-Jewish propaganda, was declared on December 5, 1941 by the New Jersey Supreme Court to be unconstitutional because of abridgement of free speech; the court unanimously holding that the anti-Jewish language of nine speakers attacking Jews before a German-American Bund meeting in June, 1940, did not constitute "a clear and present danger to the peace and safety of the state."

New York No Longer an American City

One evening soon after the circulation of "Jersey Goes Jewish," there was a loud knock at the door of the Edmondson New York apartment. My wife opened the door—and drew back. In the hallway ranked along the walls were New York police with tommy guns aimed at the door.

"What is the matter?" exclaimed my wife.

"Are you Mrs. Edmondson?"

"Yes," she replied.

"Having any trouble inside"

"No, why?"

"Police Headquarters ordered us here because of an anonymous telephone call saying your husband was 'shooting you up.'"

"Want to come in and see?" my wife asked.

"Yes"—and two officers came in. They came to where I was having a sandwich in the kitchen, looked me over. One of them said:

"Where's the gun?"

I replied "I have no gun."

The officers were making a fruitless search when the leader of the "army" called out:

"It's all right, boys. Another hoan! Our men have traced the anonymous call to a candy shop over on the avenue, where it was stated that an unknown man had recently used the phone to call police headquarters. Let's go!"

The platoon filed out grinning sheepishly, with my wife laughing at them. I called to the men:

"My guess is that somebody didn't like my last bulletin headed 'Jersey Goes Jewish.'"

The foregoing is a sample of the many annoyances—trivial demential emanations from unbalanced vindictive and revengeful mentalities wallowing in futile insensate hate—to which the Edmondsons were subjected during their patriotic crusade in a cosmopolitan city no longer American and under control of alien elements.

ROOSEVELT IMPEACHABLE?

The following is from an Edmondson bulletin of April 22, 1935:

The letter quoted below, dated Washington, D. C., April 16, 1935, has been received from Congressman Joseph A. Gavagan, Democrat, 21st N. Y. Dist., which covers the Harlem section in which Communistic rioting occurred:

"I am in receipt of your tecent ravings. Piety prompts me to charity, and charity questions your sanity. You are quite suggestive of the APA, the KKK and the recent madness in Germany. To which of these do you owe your soul? History suggests that 'patriotism' has always been the refuge of a scoundrel. Granting you are 'one-half of one per cent' American, you should curb your bitterness or hate when you refer to the President of the United States. Any good American would insist on your doing so were you to utter orally in his presence your spleen. The patriotism of President Roosevelt needs no defence nor defenders. As a citizen, however, I desire to suggest to you to seek the quiet and sanctuary of an institution where science strives for reclamation of disordered minds."

Waving aside "ravings," I reply first to your allusion to principles, which, in this crisis, transcend pusillanimous personalities and their rantings.

Assuming to deliver "a patriotic lecture," you say: "You should curb your bitterness or hate when you refer to the President of the United States," etc.

Since when has the Republic crowned its Servant-Presidents with an aura of immunity from justified condemnatory free-speech criticism? Those Americans who retain their sanity in the current Roosevelt political inferno seem to be in perfect agreement on the point that "His Imperial Majesty" has made the American Government Master of Man—in reversal of our written Constitution.

The primary meaning of "spleen" is "anger;" but, judging from the "pious and charitable" tenor of your letter. I infer that, you have endowed the term with malice and malevolence. However, the writer's pro-American anti-Roosevelt literature of the past year has been inspired solely by Jewish-Radical Leadership's anti-Americanism, having nothing directly to do with different races, individuals or religion.

Were I confronted today personally by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, as a loyal native American citizen who "owes" his patriotic soul to the "Spirit of '76," exercising Constitutional rights of free speech, I would boldly say:

"Mr. President, in my opinion—which is not incompetently supported—YOU ARE IMPEACHABLE ON THE FOLLOWING COUNTS:

"In my judgment, you repeatedly violated your Presidential oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States by usurping, in time of peace, functions expressly reserved by it to the Legislative and the Judicial Departments of the Government, specifically, when you and your advisors—

• "(a) Attempted to 'regulate the value of money' (which is solepower of Congress) through manipulation of the Federal Reserve Monetary System, national credit, dollar devaluation, and foreign exchange currency market.
• "(b) By arrogation of the Congressional sole-power to levy and collect taxes, and disburse untold millions of dollars in the administration of the AAA—later declared illegal by the Supreme Court.

"(c) In defiance of anti-monopoly laws, your NRA administration usurped

"(d) You and your advisors gave aid and comfort to the enemies of Americans by ignoring protests and maintaining diplomatic relations with the Moscow Soviets in promotion of their Communistic undermining of the liberties of the Republic.

"Furthermore, in my judgement, promises made by you as candidate have been directly broken as President, notably, to maintain sound money at all hazards —instead of which the dollar has been devalued and contracts dishonorably repudiated; to establish a tariff commission free from executive interference —whereas dictatorial power has been demanded and received; to reduce Government expenses 25 per cent, whereas they have progressively enlarged to crushing proportions; to lower the national debt, whereas it is now at record high; to cut down bureauctacy, which has tremendously expanded; to bring economic recovery, whereas it has been deliberately blocked by wholesale and impractical reforms that broadly upset confidence, without which recovery is impossible. Under your regime state sovereignty has been violated and other Constitutional liberties of the people have been communistically suppressed and fascistically centralized.

"Responsibility rests where power lies, Mr. Roosevelt."

So much, Mr. Gavagan, for Mr. Roosevelt's "patriotism"—which you say "needs no defenders."

If that be treason to Americanism, "make the most of it!"

Robert E ward Comondfor

THRIVING ON "PERSECUTION"

(From August 1, 1935, Edmondson bulletin)

Jewish Comedian "Eddie" Cantor exhibited apprehension in a "persecution" speech before a B'nai B'rith Convention July 1, 1935, in Los Angeles, regarding an approaching Jewish world crisis. He said:

"You know the Jewish situation in Europe—BUT I DOUBT IF MANY OF YOU KNOW HOW CLOSE TO THE SAME SITUATION WE ARE IN AMERICA."

Let us dispassionately turn the Searchlight of Truth on the "persecution" propaganda record, and analyze historic facts.

GENTILE "PERSECUTION" OF JEWS

The Dispersion (beginning A. D. 70) under Roman order, was apparently regarded as "persecution" by Lord Rothschild, for in talking with British Statesman Balfour in 1917 referring to the Zionist-Palestine hope, he said his people "had no home where they could lay their heads,"

Irving L. Potter's pamphlet on "The Cause of Anti-Jewism in the U. S.," says: "The Jews were expelled from England in 1290. They gained control of trade, monopolized manufacturing and financial operations. The King caused 280 Jews to be hanged in London for having corrupted the English coin. For nearly 400 years no Jew was allowed in England.

"In 1492 Queen Isabella urged the expulsion of the Jews from Spain. It is estimated that more than 200,000 were banished.

"The Jews were driven out of France four times, the last in 1394. French commerce was entirely in their hands. The Paris of the Middle Ages was almost a Jewish City."

Ingram Hughes says in "Anti-Semitism: A World Survey," 1934 edition: "Massacres of Jews occurred in Germany and Poland in 1836-7. In 1881 occurred a series of pogroms in Russia."

Expulsion of Jews from Germany under Hitler as communists.

IEWISH "PERSECUTION" OF GENTILES

Digging into the historical record of fact, authority and evidence, the unbiased investigator finds that in ancient Babylon, reign of Ahasuerus, Jews are reported as having killed 70,000 Babylonians—in memory of which event they celebrate their holiday "Purim." Was this a "persecution" of Gentiles?

Gibbon, the historian, quotes the Roman pro-Consul of Africa, Dion Cassius, as saying that 220,000 Greeks were massacred by Jews in Cyrene,

240,000 in Cyprus, and "a very great multitude in Egypt."

The persecution-by-fire of Christians by Nero (whose wife was a converted Jewess) anticipated by 19 centuries the slaughter of millions of Russians by the Jewish Bolsheviki.

Rabbi Browne in his 1924 book, "How Odd of God," says: "WE intend to REMAKE the Gentiles—WHAT THE COMMUNISTS ARE DOING IN

RUSSIA."

On Dec. 13, 1933, the Jewish National Anti-Defamation League issued a circular from Chicago headquarters saying: "Scribner & Sons have just published a book by Madison Grant entitled 'The Conquest of a Continent.' It is extremely antagonistic to Jewish interests, for the author insists that American development depends upon the elimination of unassimilable alien masses in our midst. WE ARE INTERESTED IN STIFLING THE SALE OF THIS BOOK." In other words, the Jews ordered a "persecution" boycott on a pro-American analysis. The present international trade boycott "persecution" of Germany for expelling Jewish Communists is being energized by prominent American Jews-Rabbi Wise and Samuel Untermyer.

HOW JEWS PROFITED BY "PERSECUTION"

We now come to evidence showing where Jewry has REALIZED A NET PROFIT from "persecution." Prof. Werner Sombart says in his 1913 "Jews and Modern Capitalism": "It may be somewhat inexplicable that, while throughout the Middle Ages, Jews were deprived of their 'All,' they managed to become very rich again. THE JEWS WERE NEVER MULCTED. A good portion of their wealth was transferred to fictitious ownership." "Other races have come and gone. The Jew has survived. Persecution cannot crush him. HE IS THE ARISTOCRAT OF THE WORLD," boasted Samuel Untermyer, in a speech April 13, 1933, quoted in the London "Investigator" of June, 1935.

The victorious "Russian" Revolutionary Bolshevist Council of 500 included

over 400 Jewish members.

The League of Nations was created by Jewry, according to Jewish writers. Who is the "Father" of the New Deal? Brandeis. Who is Chief Executioner? Frankfurter. Who is "Unofficial President"? Baruch. Who is in control of gold and banking but the Morgenthaus? The Palestine Zionist Mandate has been followed by Jewish acquisition of hundreds of billions of Dead Sea mineral wealth. The gold and diamond fields of South Africa are Jewish-owned.

"Our coffers are full, our homes palatial, our synagogues rise, our hospitals multiply. Never in the palmy days of our history has Israel so increased in wealth * * * The time has come when patriotic Jews of America should feel the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) hatched and planned in the Camp of Israel," says B. A. M. Schapiro, "A Jew by Race, a Christian by Faith," in a pamphlet on "America's Great Menace."

HAS IEWRY THRIVED ON "PERSECUTION"?

CAPITALIST SYSTEM JEW-PERVERTED? (From Edmondson Bulletin of Aug. 1, 1935)

Prof. Werner Sombart, in his "Jews & Modern Capitalism," 1913, holds the market in shares from 1800-1950 to be of equal significance with the expansion of the House of Rothschild, saying: "The name of Rothschild means more than the firm. It means ALL JEWDOM SO FAR AS THE STOCK EXCHANGE is concerned; for only with the help of compatitors could the Rothschilds have reached their position of power—which dominates all others—and obtain ENTIRE MASTERY OF THE STOCK EXCHANGE. In order to obtain command of the stock exchange and the money market all possible means were utilized. The Rothschilds practiced stock jobbing in the narrower sense which the French attach to the word. They employed the expedient of artificially influencing the market by creating a favorable atmosphere. The capitalist movement reached its highest point in the speculation banks. By means of loaning speculative securities, banks are placed in a position, by acquiring other securities at a cheap price, to create the impression that money is plentiful and is accompanied by a desire to buy. Thus power of creating an upward movement in prices is easily acquired—and this power can be reversed just as easily to depress prices by depreciating the store of available securities. The great banks, accordingly, hold the handle which controls the machine called the stock exchange. And the heads of the banks tend more and more TO BECOME ENTIRE MASTERS OF ECONOMIC LIFE." Holding key position in politics and finance, the system of espionage employed places these Internationalists in a position to obtain quicker and more reliable stock exchange, financial and speculative-investment information than anybody else, not excepting government, according to over thirty years' experience by the undersigned in the active investment field. Sombart further declares that: "Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the Talmud and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught ea

ARBITRARY DISARMAMENT AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK. SS.:

Robert Edward Edmondson of New York, N. Y., being duly sworn, deposes and says: On Aug. 7, 1934, David Gallup, Jewish Scatistician of Ira Haupt & Co. Stock Brokers, 50 Broadway, New York City, invaded my office at 80 Washington St., New York city, and, shoving into my hands a communication he said I sent him, angrily shouted: "I'll get you' for that."

Glancing at it. I replied: "I never saw it." banding it back.

"Yes, you have, and I'll 'get you' for it," he retorted, advancing excitedly and shaking his fist in my face.

Gallup is a young and physically powerful man, fully capable of carrying into effect sthrears: is a "prize-fight fan," according to a letter of June 25 he wrote to me:

while I at 62 am past the age of physical prowess, and wear glasses.

I was sitting cornered behind my desk at the time, with my secretary, sole witness, beside me. Unable to offer any adequate physical defense against what was a definite menacing movement probably involving bodily injury, from a man who seemed to have lost his head, and who had previously visited me, antagonistically and angrily objecting to my anti-Jewish-Radical publications; understanding the legal definition of assault to be "threats or menaces coupled with real or apparent intent and ability to commit bodily harm or injury"; having a pistol under permit to safeguard against Communist threats previously made; believing I was within the bounds of propriety in defensively displaying my revolver—I lifted the latter from a desk drawer and, laying it on the desk WITH-OUT POINTING. I said to Gallup: "Get out!"

"Oh, I see you've got a gun," he shouted. "All right, I'LL TAKE CARE OF THAT."

With that, he left, angrily repeating, "I'll get you."

Notwithstanding the foregoing affidavit, supported by witness, dated Feb. 1, 1935, pistol permit was revoked by half-Jew Mayor La Guardia, and restoration refused regardless of written statement by Edmondson's New York Counsel that "there is not a word of evidence of Edmondson's improper use of his pistol."

Charles Hall Davis, leading Virginia Constitution lawyer, wrote: "On the face of the facts as set out in your affidavit it seems to me that the action of the N. Y. Police Department in revoking your pistol permit was absolutely unjustified. . . . I think it would be wise for you to publish the affidavit, so that the people may know the facts, and in case of any future threat the full responsibility for your helplessness may be fairly chargeable to the department which revoked your permit for insufficient reasons."

A bulletin was broadcast Mar. 1, 1935, reporting the event.

A SELF-PRESERVATION FIGHT

The following was broadcast by Edmondson from coast to coast on Sept. 18, 1935:

Below is an invitation-speech delivered by Robert Edward Edmondson before "The National Sentinels" of the Republic on Constitution Day, Sept. 17, 1935, at the Hotel Montclair, New York City:

"Sentinels of The Republic!

"I am honored in having the privilege of addressing you regarding my work in this great national crisis.

"The subject is too immense, too complex, too loaded with dynamite, for extemporaneous treatment. We are trying to solve in a fragment of time, a problem centuries old. For your own self-interest, I beg you to listen with open minds. You will hear nothing but a record of fact and authority.

"I have been publicly exposing secret Anti-Americanism by POLITICAL Jewish Leadership, which I believe to be promoting Communistic plans to overthrow our Government.

"This is no time for suppression of FRANK FREE SPEECH. It is not a question of race, class or religious PRIVILEGES. IT IS A FIGHT FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. For ITS self-preservation, as well as their OWN, the Constitution imposes a DUTY on its citizenship TO DEFEND IT AGAINST ALL COMERS.

"Instigated by pressure of economic inconsistencies, an exhaustive research going back thousands of years PROVES MY THESIS FROM JEWISH RECORDS THEMSELVES. Theodor Herzl, "Father" of Zionism, Dr. Oscar Levy and other prominent Jews agree that Jews furnish the driving power for BOTH Communism and Capitalism.

"Preliminary to a study of this problem, the word "Jew" must be accepted as symbolizing a TRINITY-minority, namely, A Race, A Nationality, A Religion. The basic issue is NOT religion. It is fundamentally ECONOMIC. The CHIEF CREATION and Weapon of Jewry is DEBT.

"As a patriot, I am not against Jews on ANY of the three counts cited. I became definitely anti-Jewish in April, 1934, upon being convinced that Jewry's unrepudiated leadership was destroying Americanism.

"PRECISELY the same attitude would be taken were any other minority so offending.

"In the final analysis, we are up against a satural philosophy crystallized by centuries of absorption into an unscrupulous, predatory and inhuman Gospel of Get—practiced upon what its ruthless power-drunk leadership falsely calls 'A Gentile Common Enemy.'

Lords of the World

"Author Sombart ("Jews & Modern Capitalism," 1913) naively outlines this creed thus: 'Jews were taught early to find their chief happiness in the possession of money. They made an ART of lending money. They became LORDS of money—and Lords of THE WORLD."

'In an agonized Jeremiad against the false leadership of his people, Dr. Oscar Levy, noted London Jewish Savant, cried out in 1920: We who have promised to lead you to a New Heaven, have landed you in a New Hell.'

"I do not accuse every Jew. But my premise is that, as we are in a conflict worse than Civil War owing to the parasitical penetration of a generous, unsuspecting host, self-preservation demands NO exception for 'Pet Jews' or Gentile TOOLS, until the battle is won.

"My campaign has revived the age-old cry of 'Persecution;' but the unvarnished historic record proves that Jewry has actually THRIVED on so-called persecution—CASHING IN on the SYMPATHY of the world.

"Futhermore, Jewish Leadership has usurped supreme political power throughout the world Finkelstein-Litvinoff is President of the Council of The League of Nations, itself admittedly a Jewish idea; Lord Reading, with Samuels, Sassoon and other Jews, rule England; Jewish-blooded Laval is Premier of France, whose Government is SHOT THROUGH with his tribe; The Big Vive of the Soviet Regime, with their ambassadors to England, Germany, Italy and the United States, are ALL Jewish by ancestry or marriage.

"At home, we have 'Father Brandeis' of the New Deal; as Executor, 'Karl Marx Professor' Frankfurter; 'Unofficial President' Baruch; International Bankers Morgenthau and Lehman; Roosevelt's 'Right-Arm' Rosenman—all so titled by a boastful JEWISH publication—the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner.

"As a veteran journalist, I tell you that over 95 per cent of our metropolitan daily press is Jew-cowed by politico-economic pressure. Out of 1,800 managing editors of leading American dailies, to whom I recently sent a personal fraternal patriotic appeal, with 'Proof of Plot,' TWO ONLY HAD THE COURAGE TO REPLY. Our Citizens are BLINDED by the 'kept men of the press.'

"Economic Cancer being the basic CAUSE of the trouble, Economic SUR-GERY is the REAL Cure; but the IMMEDIATE destroying agency is POLITICAL. As the necessary PURGING of politics can come ONLY through public enlightenment, the PRIMARY remedy is PUBLICITY.

"Therefore, with the press unavailable, my work has been directed along the Voltarian thesis that revolutions can be COUNTERED, as well as promoted by PAMPHLETEERING.

"What can we PERSONALLY DO?

"Use the latest WEAPON OF THE ENEMY. BOYCOTT Jewish production. BUY Loyal Gentile. Boycott Jewish POLITICANS.

"Above All, FREE YOUR PRESS. It is America's FIRST LINE OF Defence. BOYCOTT unpatriotic publications which do not print ALL the news or POLITICALLY DISTORT headlines. Withhold ADVERTISING patronage—Their LIFEBLOOD.

"History proves that THE WORST happens to those who won't believe it CAN happen. Are treasonably negligent Americans going to give up their PRICELESS LIBERTY-BIRTHRIGHT, bought with centuries of untold sacrifice, for AN INTERNATIONAL MESS OF COMMUNISTIC POTTAGE?

"Sentinels of The Republic! MAKE NO MISTAKE!

'We are not in a racial, class or religious conflict. IT IS A FIGHT FOR SELF-PRESERVATION!

"An historic Hour of Decision is upon us! The COMMUNISTIC Die is Cast!

TO AMERICAN FARMERS

The following was published by Edmondson Oct. 15, 1935:

Farmers of America!

You are being fooled by alien anti-national financialists. Watch your step!

Are you going to surrender your Birthright of Freedom for a Mess of Internationalism?

The "dole" you receive from Washington is America's heritage of Working Capital. When it is gone—WHAT THEN?

This is not Republican or Democratic or other political partisan propaganda. It is an American PATRIOTIC APPEAL to save the Republic.

Look at the farmers of Russia! Are they FREE? No! Millions have been 'liquidated' and millions enslaved by Internationalists.

Read this: "What Jewish Idealism and Jewish Discontent have so powerfully contributed to produce in Russia, the same Historic Qualities of the Jewish Mind are tending to promote IN OTHER COUNTRIES. The Jew evolved organized capitalism, with its working instrumentality, the banking system."—The American Hebrew, Sept. 20, 1920.

Communizing enemies of the Republic have been inciting farm against city and city against farm. The interests of each are as identical as those of industrial capital and labor. WHO will buy from you if the city cannot pay price advances caused by the destruction of food?

The farmer receives too little for his products and the city pays too much. WHO GETS THE PROFIT? The Middleman. WHO is this Middleman? An un-American PARASITE.

We have been sold out to a foreign foe! We are in a war for SELF-PRES-ERVATION against the most deadly enemy that ever menaced the Republic.

The undersigned PRO-American is not afraid of what the enemy is doing so much as WHAT AMERICANS ARE NOT DOING to save the Country to which they owe ALL.

It's up to you, Farmers of America to "RESCUE THE REPUBLIC!"

A JEWISH CONFESSION OF GUILT

(From Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 19, 1935)

To remove any doubt as to the authenticity of the astounding sadistic confession in part quoted below, boldly addressed to Gentiles, the undersigned desires to say that he has the Century Magazine in which it was printed, as published in the January, 1928, issue.

The author of the article uses a boastful pen-name: "Marcus Eli Ravage"—translated "The Big Destruction Hammer of God." He is said to be a

The title, "The Real Case Against the Jews," uncovers a tragic wisecracking audacity elevated to the nth power of expression, dramatized in a devastatingly penetrating admission of universal guilt so appalling, yet completely confirming to those who hold the key, as to put it at once in the classification of the "protocols," whose predictions are being fulfilled today with precision.

"Of course you DO resent US JEWS. The thing that intrigues me about this anti-Jewish business, however, is your TOTAL LACK OF GRIT. You seem to be suffering with self-consciousness horribly. It is not as if you were amateurs—you have been at it for over 15 centuries. You resent us, but you cannot clearly say why.

"We are, if you are to be believed, a menace to your racial integrity. We shirk our patriotic duty in wartime, because we are pacifists by nature and tradition.

"You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge, WHAT OF IT?

"Take the three principal revolutions in modern times—the French, American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long way off. WE STILL DOMINATE YOU.

"You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theatres and movie palaces. Granted, your complaint is well-founded. But what is that compared with our STAGGERING INFLUENCE in your churches, your schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think?"

"You believe 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.' But what is that beside the unquestionable and historical conspiracy which we have carried out, and which we have never denied because you have never had the courage to charge us with it?

"You call us subverters, agitators, revolution-mongers. IT IS THE TRUTH—and I cower at your discovery.

"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We are at the bottom not merely of the latest great war, but nearly all your wars. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. We did it solely with the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda.

"If we were in your place we should dislike you more cordially than you do us. BUT WE SHOULD MAKE NO BONES ABOUT TELLING YOU WHY. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that. IT MAKES US QUAKE. We are conscious of the injury we did when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, will never know the REAL BLACKNESS OF OUR CRIMES.

"Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to VIOLENCE?"

When one comes to full realization of what all-engulfing insensate power surging emotion wields over even disciplined individual minds, then will be understood their deep fear of mob violence. Jewish Leadership is past-master in evaluating mass-psychology.

"JEWS ARE COMMUNISTS"

(James Waterman Wise in "The New Masses" of Oct. 29, 1935.)

Claiming that the CONSERVATIVE element of Jewry is misrepresenting it in belittling Jewish Communism, James Waterman Wise, Rabbi Wise's son, in the Oct. 29, 1935, issue of "The New Masses" (edited mostly by Jews) attacks the "statistic-buttressed" proclamation broadcast Oct. 21 by the American Jewish Committee, the B'nai B'rith and the Jewish Labor Committee.

"These three representative Jewish organizations publicly challenged the recent Hitler charge that the Jewish race predominated in the Communist movement in Germany, and in addition declared that only a few of the rulers of the Soviets are Jewish."

Says James Waterman Wise:

"Jews are not Communists," is the burden of a statement issued jointly by Dr. Cyrus Adler, President of the American Jewish Committee; Alfred M. Cohen, President of the B'nai B'rith; and B. C. Vladeck, Chairman of the Jewish Labor Committee.

"These gentlemen hysterically deny that Communism is Jewish, and frenziedly repudiate Jews who are Communists. Their statement libels Soviet Russia and lies about the Jewish people.

"Let us analyze their statement, the First attempts to show that the Jews of Germany and of other countries were not and are not Communists. The Second, that Communism and the Soviet Union are themselves foes of Jews and Judaisim. Of Soviet Russia, it says: 'Among the 36 Commissars who constitute Soviet Russia, only two are Jews.'

"Is it possible that the heads of the American Jewish Committee, the B'nai B'rith and the Jewish Labor Committee, have never heard of Litvinoff, of Yaroslovsky, Kaganowitch, Radek, Bela Kun? Jews who deny that many Jews are Communists are jockeying themselves into the position of citizens on toleration.

"Will not the gentlemen who today disclaim Jewish Communists, tomorrow disclaim Jewish Socialists?

"That the authors of this piece of perfidy do not represent THE MASSES of American Jews, will be made abundantly clear. To counteract its poison and to preclude its repetition, Jews must take active and positive measures. There must be a widening and strengthening of the united front against fascism. And, if by taking full part in the forging of this united front, the Jews of America write themselves down as Communists—SO BE IT."

The foregoing statements supply a complete justification of the writer's strong conrention for many months that a majority of Jews are Communistic. Why was the Communist Party mass meeting called on June 2, 1934, at Madison Square Garden to endorse the Soviet, sponsored by 100 Jewish organizations?

COMMUNISM THE GOAL OF A. C. L. U.? (From Edmondson Bulletin of Nov. 1, 1935)

"The American Civil Liberties Union is a supporter of all subversive movements in the U. S."—Lusk report to N. Y. State Legislature in 1928.

"The ACLU is closely affiliated with the COMMUNIST movement in the U. S., and fully 90% of its efforts are on behalf of COMMUNISTS who have come into conflict with the law. It is quite apparent that its main function is to attempt to protect COMMUNISTS in their advocacy of force to overthrow the U. S. Government."—House of Representatives Report 2290 of Jan. 17, 1931.

Roger N. Baldwin, former IWW, alumnus of Harvard University, describes himself as follows in the April Class Book of 1935, according to Donald Parson, a classmate, writing to the N. Y. Herald Tribune Oct. 8, 1935: "I have continued directing the unpopular fight for the right of agitation, AS DIRECTOR of the ACLU. I have been to Europe several times, mostly in connection with INTERNATIONAL RADICAL ACTIVITY. I am for Socialism. I seek social ownership of property and the abolition of the propertied class. COMMUNISM is the goal!"

The International Labor Defense aids COMMUNISTS arrested for revolutionary activities. The ACLU 1931 report prints this: "The ACLU early in the struggle raised money and aided the defense committees of both the IWW and ILD."

Hundreds of other similar cases are given on page after page in the "Red Network." William Z. Foster, COMMUNIST candidate for President in 1932, was an ACLU Committeeman until 1930. Harry F. Ward, ACLU Chairman, admits cooperation with COMMUNISTS. according to Page 331 of the "Red Network."

Reporting an anti-war meeting of students April 12, 1935, the N. Y. Sun said: "Roger N. Baldwin, ACLU Director, spoke as follows: We cannot maintain an organization worthy of its name without COMMUNISM."

. Felix Frankfurter, "Karl Marx Professor of Harvard," born in Vienna, is listed as a National Committeeman of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Frankfurter was appointed Counsel of the Mooney Commission and tried to enlist the influence of Former President Theodore Roosevelt to aid Mooney, a COMMUNIST. The ex-President wrote Frankfurter Dec. 19, 1917, as follows: "You have taken an attitude which seems to me fundamentally that of Trotsky and the other Bolsheviki leaders."

ROOSEVELT'S SUPREME COUNCIL (From Edmondson Bulletin of Nov. 15, 1935)

The six-point Solomon Star Picture below, presenting "AMERICA'S IN-VISIBLE GOVERNORS" and important "allies," gives only part of a long list of New Deal "Supreme Council" members surrounding President F. D. Roosevelt.

The above interlaced triangle Star Seal of Jewish Ownership—on all synagogues—now appears on U. S. Post Office dead letter envelopes; U. S. Army Helmets, Sixth Division; U. S. Navy Dept. seals; new one dollar bills; medal of President Roosevelt; Masonic Lodges; Police Badges of Chicago and Milwaukee.

In the 1937 World Almanac under "U. S. Presidents and Their Wives," appears this: "Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the son of James Roosevelt, a direct descendant of Claes Martenzan van ROSENVELT, who arrived in New Amsterdom in 1649 and married Jannetje SAMUELS."

COMMUNIZING THE CONSTITUTION

(From Speech Delivered by Robert Edward Edmondson Before Audience of 1500, at a Meeting of The American National Labor Party in New York City, Nov. 19, 1935)

Men and Women of America: KNOW your Government. Until you do you cannot Protect, Preserve and Defend your Country!

The United States Government is neither a True Democracy nor a True Republic. It is AN AGENCY, established and existing by reason of a written Constitution which limits its control over the 48 states through the giving to it by their people of only eighteen listed powers, delegated for the purpose of the different national objects of the union. The states especially reserved all other powers to themselves. The Washington National Government has powers over the states ONLY to the extent necessary for NATIONAL operations.

In jealous guardianship of all their state rights, the Framers and Founders of the United States Federation carefully avoided the creation of a dangerous central Washington government.

The people of the 48 states GOVERN THEMSELVES through a DOUBLE Political System of STRICTLY LIMITED POWERS.

The ONLY kind of a government communizing or socializing internationalists CAN EASILY SUBVERT is a liberalized or true democracy, because such mob-rule is quickly misled by confusion propaganda.

Therefore, the plan of socialistic communizers is to work always for anything that will cause a "leveling down" of electoral intelligence to the lowest democratic average.

The price of liberty is eternal vigilence. We have failed to guard the priceless gift of common sense liberty given to us by the wise men of '76.

German National Socialism, as outlined by its leader, should solve Germany's problems because it is founded in Patriotism—which the Jew fears because it is his worst enemy. But our Individual Americanism is best for the United States because Americans decide their affairs as individuals. Furthermore, America cannot have a "single racial soul," for it is made up of many races. It was founded on A Great Principle—that of Individual Freedom. We must be loyal to such Americanism, first and last.

Throwing off the European political custom of relying on master-leadership, which they believed to be dangerous to human freedom, Americans long ago fitted themselves individually for self-government. That system worked well before the 20th Century Jewish Invasion.

Remember, from the President down, the men we elect to office do not become our masters, but our servants. In time of peril, citizens must show their patriotism by honest public criticism of their official servants.

The head of our present national political administration has admittedly broken most of the pledges of the Democratic Party Platform on which he was elected. He is therefore not a party Democrat.

He has taken and used powers belonging to Congress and the courts in time of peace, thereby violating his oath to protect, defend and preserve the Constitution. He has tried to sovietize American industry by an illegal NRA and American farmers through the triple A. His administration has become widely known as "The Jew Deal." He is therefore not an American.

Above all, let us present a united front against the enemy. His defense is a false front. He admits it by calling his real resistance "tissue paper" against a

united Americanism. But he works while you sleep. He sows the seeds of suspicion, jealousy and hatred. His safety lies in keeping us quarrelsome, confused and divided. Banish all differences until this great fight is won. We have but one enemy—Jewry.

Whether or not you were born here, if you believe in and are loyal to America's Great Principle of Individual Freedom, this is your country. Don't torget that our forefathers came from the conquering pioneer men of Europe. They settled this land. They built this nation. It's ours! We are going to keep it and run it. No Horde of Asiatic Pirates is going to take it from us!

It is time to think straight American, to speak plain American, to act

direct American.

JEW-STAR ON U. S. ARMY HELMETS

Below is copy of an open self-explanatory letter from Edmondson:

Gen. Malin Craig, Chief of Staff, U. S. A.,

New York, Dec. 10, 1935

Dear Sir

The Recruiting Publicity Bureau of the United States Army on Governor's Island is distributing 38 x 25 recruiting posters. At the top in the right corner thereof appears a picture of five American soldiers lying among brush aiming rifles, with the order printed below: "Fire at will!" SIX-POINT STARS ARE SHOWN ON THEIR HELMETS.

From the Recruiting Publicity Bureau the undersigned obtained a copy of "Recruiting News" of August 15, 1933, issued by the Adjutant General of the United States Army, on page 3 of which the following information is printed around a six-point star:

"The original insignia of the Sixth Division of the American Expeditionary Forces was A WHITE CROSS surmounting a White Circle. AFTER the Armistice in 1918, a RED SIX-POINT STAR was officially substituted for this symbol."

This six-point interlaced double-triangle has been the "possession symbol" of International Jewry for centuries. It may be seen today on synagogues; on Jewish-Masonic emblems; on documents of the Jewish-controlled British Government; on Jew-owned public buildings in New York; ON MEDALS CARRYING ON ONE SIDE THE FACE OF PRESIDENT FRANKLIND. ROOSEVELT—on the other the said Jewish star. And recently, this six-point star HAS BEEN IMPRINTED ON UNITED STATES POST OFFICE ENVELOPES FROM THE DEAD-LETTER DIVISION.

In the Name of The Republic, the undersigned native American loyal citizen and his associatees hereby patriotically demand the restoration to the Sixth Division of The White Cross insignia—symbol of our overwhelmingly CHRISTIAN country—in place of the six-point alien star, an Oriental anti-Christian and un-American emblem.

Yours for America FIRST.

"KEEP CHRISTMAS OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS!"

The following quotation from the New York Jewish newspaper, "The Day," of Dec. 14, 1935, printed in English below the above caption, speaks for itself in no uncertain arrogancy, and is particularly interesting at Christmas Time:

"With the approach of Christmas we begin to be wary of religious propaganda disguised as music and cultural entertainment. WE WANT ALL THIS CHRISTMAS PROPAGANDA STOPPED—leave the public schools alone!

"Some Jews 'falling' for the Christmas slogan: 'Good Will to All Men, pretend not to see in Christmas a distinctly Christian Holiday but a sort of folk festival common to all in the United States. That they are thoroughly mistaken, goes without saying.

"The masses of Jewish people in America HAVE A RIGHT TO DE-MAND from the educational system of the United States that IT KEEP CHRISTMAS OUT OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS—and now is the time to place this demand before public officials.

"PUBLIC SCHOOLS MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF CHRISTMAS CAROLS AND OTHER CHRISTMAS INFLUENCE. THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM OF NEW YORK CITY—AND OTHER CITIES WITH LARGE IEWISH POPULATIONS—PLEASE TAKE NOTICE!"

"This is a CHRISTIAN NATION," is an extract from the "Holy Trinity" Case decision by the U. S. Supreme Court, per Justice Brewer, FEB. 29, 1892, 143 U. S. 457.

Chief Justice Kent of the N. Y. Supreme Court said in "The People vs. Ruggles, 8 Johns, 225, p. 227, 228—1811": "The majority of the people of this state, in common with the people of this country, profess the general doctrines of CHRISTIANITY, as the rule of their faith and practice."

The last paragraph of the Constitution of the United States reads. "Done in convention by the unanimous consent of the states present the 17th Day of September, in the year of OUR LORD (Jesus Christ), 1787, and of the Independence of the U.S. A., the 12th."

1952 AGENDA

Three resort owners in upstate New York have been haled to court by the American Jewish Congress for displaying a sign "Church Nearby" without another saying the same thing about "synagogue," charging violation of the N. Y. State FEPC anti-Discrimination Law forbidding advertising along the lines of race, color or religion. (N. Y. Jewish Examiner of Dec. 5, 1952)

Isn't that N. Y. State law a violation of the personal privilege right which

AN AWELL CONFESSION

Judging from a twenty-year experience, most Jews cannot live in the rarefied atmosphere of simple Christianity, and apparently, in obedience to a mysterious emotional or sadistic paranoic complex, seek to drag everything down to a materialistic level—in line with the following Jeremiad written by their Poet Leader Israel Zangwill, in "Israel," published on Page 131, in the book "Blind Children":

"ISR AEL

"Pious, fanatical zealots, throttled by Talmud-coil;

"Impious, lecherous skeptics, cynical stalkers of Spoil;

"Wedded 'neath Hebrew awning, buried 'neath Hebrew sod;

"Between, not a dream of Duty, never a glimpse of God

"Blarneying, shivering, crawling, taking all Colors but None;

"Lying a fox in the covert, leaping an ape in the Sun!"

COMMENT ON ZANGWILL "POEM"

That is the most dreadful indictment ever published according to the criterions of piercing penetration, merciless dissection, derisive mockery and excoriating sadistic cruelty.

Surely it must have been soul searing surgery for the author, a Jew thus o so contemptuously hold up before the world the horrific picture of his own

people's humiliating degradation.

After analyzing, the impartial spectator stands aghast at the all-engulfing tragedy of it all, while the wells of pure pity drain dry in pre-viewing the inevitable mass-reckoning foreshadowed by the evolutionary principle of com-

pensatory-retribution.

This writer has not found in secular or biblical history any parallel arraignment outside of the Divine Denunciation (minus sadism) which, in company with that other curse in John 8:44, has come thundering down the centuries, which condemnation began with the phrase "WOE unto you Scribes and Pharisees," as recorded in New Testament, Matthew, Chapters 15, 16, 21, 23—wherein, incidentally, reference is made to "Blind Guides," which might indirectly have been responsible for Zangwill's Title "Blind Children."

And, judging from the past and the present, in view of this and biblical Jeremiads, dare any man challenge the historic accusation: "The Same, Yester-

day. Today-Tomorrow"?

I sincerely hope that frequent use of the "language of vigor" in exposure of Jewish anti-Americanism, may arouse victimized Jewry to tribal revolt against and emancipation from the false leadership that is destroying them as well as shaking civilization's foundations.

DESTINY CALLS DICKINSON!

In response to a request for support of Senator L. J. Dickinson of Iowa as candidate for the Presidency of the United States in May, 1936, Editor Edmondson replied that if the senator would broadcast "A New Proclamation of Emancipation" as outlined below, support would be forthcoming from many quarters. This was published on May 26:

My Fellow-Countrymen!

I have a high duty to perform. Our Immortal Lincoln has said: "Have faith in the people—TELL THEM THE TRUTH!" Believing that ONLY the Truth will set us FREE from our present oppression, at the risk of all I hold dear I hereby broadcast the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

The existence of this Republic is menaced by a world conspiracy. By the monopoly of international gold-flow through a foreign-devised monetary system, a hidden international financial super-power courses the political and economic destinies of our country.

By secret money corruptions, the freedom of communication between our citizens has been destroyed. WE NO LONGER HAVE A FREE PRESS. At the source in great metropolitan centers and through distributing agencies, news vital to the welfare of the nation is deliberately suppressed by (1) advertising influence, (2) financial necessities, (3) political manipulation and (4) alien ownership. Even the air is subsidized. America's first line of defense—the avenues of information—is down. The people are blinded. The Supreme Court and the Constitution are undermined by propaganda, and the very existence of the Republic is at stake!

ONLY by a free and public exchange of news and views can Government of, by and for the Majority, be carried on. The primary issue before us today is neither the Consti-

tution nor the Supreme Court—IT IS FREEDOM TO PRINT AND BROADCAST ALL THE NEWS. With Freedom of Press, the Constitution is defended! With Freedom of Press, the Supreme Court is preserved! With Freedom of Press, the Republic is saved.

I charge Franklin D. Roosevelt with being the forefront of this conspiracy in America. I accuse him of giving aid and comfort to our alien enemies through his Jewish-Radical administration. I believe him to be guilty of treason to the Republic. He has surrounded himself with a Supreme Council of alien-minded Jews, led by "Karl Marx" Professor Frankfurter, International Banker Morgenthau, Wall Street Speculator Baruch, Zionist "Elder" Brandeis, Socialist Filene and other prominent leaders of that minority; and he has appointed thousands of Jews to key-controls throughout the entire Government.

He has not fulfilled pre-election pledges. He was elected under false pretenses. In the language of the Declaration of Independence, by his bureaucracy, "He has erected a multitude of new offices, and set swarms of officers to harrass our people and eat out our substance." Through his Jewish Radical Advisory Council, "He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws." By his AAA processing and other attempted confiscatory levies, "He has imposed taxes on us without our consent"—raising our national debt to record high levels. Through thousands of Communistic strike revolts for high power and not for justice, "He has incited domestic insurrections among us." And he has blocked economic recovery by impossible wholesale reforms.

"It is evident that Roosevelt is not the leader of the forces behind him. He is being used by them." Such was the judgment of Journalist Walter Lippman, in the N. Y. Evening Post of June 26, 1932, in commenting upon Democratic National Convention developments.

To use the concluding language of the Declaration of Independence: "When a long train of abuses and usurpations evince a design to reduce them to absolute despotism it is the people's right, it is their duty to throw off such government."

What is this international conspiracy? you ask. Who is behind it? What is its object? I will tell you the truth.

We first knew it by the name of "New Deal." It is centuries old. It has paraded under many disguises down the corridor of time. It promoted French revolutions. It conquered Russia by bloody betrayal. It overcame Germany. It helped to finance the Spanish revolution. In our own land, by many subversions, it has finally exposed its international revolutionary character, shaking the Communist fist of civil war.

But Communism is not its real nature. Communism is an impossible atheistic doctrine founded on the evil theory that "might makes right!" It is a diabolical philosophy of gross materialism. And it is AN EFFECT. The Cause of Communism is an ancient fantastic ambition lusting for universal power.

The source of Communism is the deadly enemy of Civilization. It especially covets rich Christian America. UNDER ITS RULE INDIVIDUAL ECONOMIC SECURITY WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE.

False Jewish Leadership

THIS WORLD ENEMY NO. 1 IS THE FALSE LEADERSHIP OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY.

In this connection I call your attention to the significant Los Angeles defi-speech on Oct. 28, 1935, by Agricultural "Commissar" Tugwell, who declared that the New Deal "movement will go on in any case, IT LIES IN THE BRAINS AND BLOOD OF A PEOPLE BRINGING INTO SUBSTANCE THE STUFF OF OLD RACIAL DREAMS."

In the light of what follows, I leave it to your imagination as to whether or not those "Old Racial Dreams" of super-dominion are associated with a Jewish fanatic ambition to govern the world spurred on by a selfish legendary complex.

PROOF OF PLOT FROM "OLD RACIAL" RECORDS

"Jewish elements provide the driving power for both Capitalism and Communism. We Jews have grievously erred. We who invented the chosen people myth, and who have posed as having given to the world its Savior, are nothing but its seducers, its incendiaries, its destroyers. We, who promised to lead you to a New Heaven, have led you into a New Hell." Those damning words were written by a London Jewish Savant, Dr. Oscar Levy—afterward exiled—in a preface to the book, "The World Significance of the Russian Revolution," by George Pitt-Rivers in 1920.

"There is a Jewish conspiracy against all nations. It occupies everywhere the avenues of power—the double assault of Jewish Revolution and Jewish Finance." That is from the pen of Jewish Author Rene Groos, as quoted on June 15, 1929, in a French weekly called "La Vieille France."

"When we Jews sink we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic). When we rise, there arises our terrible power of the purse (Capitalistic)." Thus wrote Theodor Herzl, European Zionist Leader, in his book, "The Jewish State."

"The Talmud, the Rabbis' Bible, is the very soul of the Jew. He was taught early to find his chief happiness in the possession of money. They became Lords of money, and Lords of the World." That is from Werner Sombart's suppressed book, "Jews & Modern Capitalism." (1913).

Note this: "What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent so powerfully contributed to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind are tending to promote IN OTHER COUNTRIES. The Jew evolved organized capitalism, with its working instrumentality, the banking system."—This from The American Hebrew, Sept. 20, 1920. (Paul M. Warburg was "Father" of the Federal Reserve System.)

"The Revolutionary Administration which directed the Communist Conquest of Russia was composed of 545 men, 447 of whom were Jews," wrote Victor Marsden (in December, 1918), for many years Correspondent in Russia for The London Morning Post—naming as leaders Trotsky, Apfelbaum, Rykoff, Radek and other Jews.

"We intend to remake the Gentile—what the Communists are doing in Russia," says Rabbi Lewis Browne in his book, "How Odd of God." "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian." said the London Jewish World of March 15, 1923.

"The League of Nations is a Jewish conception," wrote Jewish Author Israel Zangwill in the London Jewish "Guardian" of June 11, 1920; while Zionist Leader Sokolov boasted. "We Jews established it after a fight of 25 years." (N. Y. Times of Aug. 28.1922.)

In the shadow of those immortal documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, I hereby declare that I am not opposed to Jews as Jews, as to their Race or as to their Religion; but I am unalterably against that Jewish anti-Americanism which, directed by false leadership, IS DESTROYING THE REPUBLIC.

With the help of Divine Providence and your aid, if you elect me to the Presidency with a mandate to smash this deadly alien conspiracy against our beloved country, to that great reconstructive end I solemnly consecrate "my life, my fortune and my sacred honor."

N. Y. GAG LAW PROPOSED BY JEWS

Cunningly designed to abolish free speech, press, radio and assembly in New York State, the text of Senate Bill 163, introduced Jan. 9, 1936, by Jewish Senator Schwartzwald of Brooklyn, a strengthened DUPLICATE of the law enacted on April 8, 1935, in New Jersey, reads as below:

"Section 1: Any person who shall print, write, multigraph, or in ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, make or produce or by any means set out or make legible in any language:

"(a) ANY BOOK, speech, statement, circular or pamphlet which, in ANY WAY, in any part thereof, incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOS-TILITY against any group or groups of persons residing or BEING in this STATE, by reason of RACE, color, religion or MANNER of worship;

(Interpretative Comment: "Any Book" must include the New Testament, Christian Bible, in which Christ is quoted in John 8:44 as denouncing the Jews: "Ye are of your father, the Devil. The Truth is not in you." "Any article" must include newspaper items printing "Shylocks" over names of Jewish criminal usurers.)

"(b) Any constitution, by-laws, rules, regulations or record of any proceedings of ANY ORGANIZATION, association, corporation, society, order, club or MEETING OF THREE or more persons, which in ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY * * * by reason of RACE, color, religion or MANNER of worship;

("Any organization" must include churches, whose preachers frequently quote the Old Testament Bible, in which this appears, Kings 11:32: "Jehovah turned not from his fierce wrath against Judah, saying, 'I shall remove Judah out of my sight.'"

'(c) Any PICTURE, photograph, emblem, representation, sign or token, which in ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES, advocates or symbolizes hatred, violence or HOSTILITY * * * by reason of RACE, color, religion or MANNER of worship, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR;

("Any picture" must include one of "Christ Crucified" by the Jews, "Any sign" must include the Cross, of which the Swastika is a form.)

• "Section 2: Any person who shall HAVE IN HIS POSSESSION, for the purpose or WITH INTENT to utrer, sell, give away, circulate, distribute or exhibit to the view of ANOTHER, or any person who shall utter, sell, give away, circulate, send, transmit, distribute or exhibit to the view of another;
• ("Having in possession" must include a newspaper containing an item unfavorable to Jewish aims, and a Jewish Judge may decide whether or not there was "intent" to "incite.")
• "(a) Any book, speech, article, statement, circular, pamphlet or other written, printed or multigraphed matter, made or produced in ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, in any language or by ANY means set out and made legible which in ANY way in any part thereof, incires, counsels. PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.;
• ("Any book" must also include the Congressional Record, in which Congressman Hamilton Fish reported that a "large percentage of known Communist district organizers are of Jewish Origin"; and in which Former Congressman McFadden said: "The U. S. should not permit the Jewish International Bankers to drive it into another war." Also the "Red Network," which lists 350 Jews as undesirable radicals.)
• "(b) Any constitution, by-laws, rules, regulations of records of any proceeding or PURPORTING to be such, or any organization, association, corporation, society, ordet, club or meeting of THREE or more persons, made or produced in any manner, or by any means set out and made legible, in any language, which in ANY way or in any part thereof, incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.
• "(c) Any PICTURE, photograph, emblem, representation, sign or token made or produced in ANY manner, which in ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.;
• ("Any emblem" must include the Cross embodying a crucified Christ worn by church officials. "Any picture" would include a hook-nose cartoon, holding Jews up to ridicule-hostility.)
• "Section 3: Any person who shall EXHIBIT or display at any meeting of three or more persons or in any parade, public or PRIVATE, or in any public place, ANY FLAG, banner, emblem, picture, photograph, representation, tableau, performance, sign or token, which in ANY WAY incites, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.;
  • ("Any Performance" means a Christmas Tableau in church or public school.)
• "Section 4: Any person who shall, in the presence of TWO or more persons; in any language, make or utter ANY speech, statement or declaration, which in ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, abuse, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.;
• ("Any speech" means constitutional free speech or discussions. It would be a crime to name Frankfurter, Brandeis. Baruch, Morgenthau, Filene, Rabbi Wise, Trotsky, Karl Marx, all Jews, in connection with Communism.)
• "Section 5: Any owner, lessee, manager, agent or other person who shall knowingly let or hire out, or permit the use of any building, structure, auditorium, hall or room or any part thereof, whether licensed or not, to or for the use of ANY organization, association, society, order, club, group or meeting of THREE or more persons, where it it purported or INTENDED to hold ANY MEETING or ASSEMBLY of THREE or more persons where at any provision or provisions of the four preceding paragraphs are to be violated; and any person or persons who shall knowingly hire any such building, structure, auditorium, hall or room, or any part thereof, for the purpose of using or permitting the same to be used by others, for the purpose of violating any provision or provisions of the four preceding paragraphs hereof, SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR;
• ("Any Assembly" means denial of the constitutional right of free assemblage or mass meeting to protest against a monopoly like the moving picture industry, Jew-controlled.)
• "Section 6: Any persons who shall from any station, studio, radio transmission equipment, microphone or any other equipment or device of ANY nature or kind, located within this State, broadcast or make audible to others, within this State, through any radio receiving set, device or equipment of any nature or kind, located within this State, in any language, any speech, declaration, statement or PRONOUNCEMENT which in ANY way incites, counsels, promotes or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY SHALL BE GILLTY OF A MISDEMEANOR:

"Section 7: Any persons, firm, corporation or association violating any provision of this act, shall be PUNISHABLE by a fine of not more than \$5,000 nor less than \$200, or by IMPRISONMENT not exceeding THREE YEARS, nor less than NINETY DAYS, or by such fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the court.

For Governorship at the last general State election, LEHMAN headed the Democratic ticket; MOSES the Republican, SOLOMON the Socialist; AMTER, the Communist. All Jews!

"FORTUNE" FOR JEWISH MONOPOLY

(Edmondson February 3, 1936 publication)

The magazine "Fortune," in a February 1936 issue largely devoted to the defense of Jewry, asks with familiar arrogance: "WHY SHOULDN'T THEY MONOPOLIZE ANY PROFESSION OR INDUSTRY THEY ARE INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO CAPTURE? WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE IF JEWS RUN AWAY WITH THE SYSTEM?"

"It is not pleasant to have individuals like the REVEREND Gerald B. Winrod of 'The Defenders of The CHRISTIAN FAITH' (of Wichita, Kan.); or like Robert Edward Edmondson, WHO MANUFACTURES HATE in New York City, invite the country to attack Jews."

If the Patriotic Crusade against the Jewish anti-Americanism of the Roosevelt Jewish-Radical Administration is so unimportant—as it argues while soothing "suspicious tycoons"—why do prominent "Jewish" publications as "The American Hebrew," "The New Masses," "The N. Y. World-Telegram," "Fortune" and other "kept men of the press," repeatedly devote so much publicity to the Edmondson Americanism FIRST Campaign?

If to WARN fellow-countrymen against the CAUSE of the Communism that murdered and enslaved Russia and is similarly trying to destroy American Political, Economic and Spiritual Liberties;

If to EXPOSE to Patriotic JUSTICE the anti-national treason-conspiracy of the false leadership of the greatest international blood regimented parasitical-solidarity the world has ever known;

If to turn the X-Ray of Truth on Minority Materialists once denounced by AN AUTHORITY—than whom there is no higher—as "Sons of the Devil;"

If THAT be "manufacturing hate," then I plead guilty to obeying the High Command to "Love Good and HATE EVIL," and await, supremely confident, the verdict of an ENLIGHTENED AMERICA.

TUGWELL'S COMMUNISTIC RACIAL DREAM

The following is from February 8, 1936 Edmondson bulletin:

"Sudden Death," or "Oppose Roosevelt and Die," is the designation of a startling and impressively informative news editorial published by the independent Highland Post of Ulster County. New York, under date of February 6, 1936, in which the writer essays to answer the query: Whence the Curse?

This rather terrifying analysis, with relentless logic, takes apart the notorious Tugwell revolutionary speech delivered Oct. 28, 1935, in Los Angeles, and exposes the horror lurking therein.

Note the Tugwell camouflaged key-phrases as X-rayed below:

"We are assisting OUR PEOPLE to place themselves in the most advantageous and permanently SECURE situations.

"The nation is witnessing the Death-struggle of industrial autocracy and the birth of democratic discipline," declared Tugwell.

"We are establishing a farmer-worker alliance which will carry all before it. Our best strategy is to surge forward with the workers and the farmers, trusting to the genius of OUR LEADER for the disposition of our forces and the timing of our attacks.

"The movement will go on in any case. IT LIES IN THE BRAINS AND BLOOD OF A PEOPLE BRINGING INTO SUBSTANCE THE STUFF OF OLD RACIAL DREAMS."

It is especially noteworthy that Tugwell repeatedly employs the phrase "worker-farmer." This is the precise expression continually used by the official organ of the Communist Party, "The Daily Worker," in urging civil war combination of the two classes against the industrial and agricultural "kulaks."

Commenting on Tugwell's speech, Washington Correspondent Mark Sullivan said in the N. Y. Herald Tribune on Nov. 16, 1935: "Prof. Tugwell is the REAL ANIMATING GENIUS of the New Deal. He is powerful in astuteness; powerful in understanding how to bring about revolution. He has studied it in Russia."

Is Tugwell Jewish?

"INCALCULABLE DAMAGE" TRIBUTE

I enjoyed a Californian's illuminating report received about March 7, 1936, under the heading "A Real Tribute from the Jewish B'nai B'rith Messenger" of Feb. 21, 1936, published in Los Angeles, reading:

"We should not dismiss Robert Edward Edmondson as a crackpot—though there is no doubt he is just that. Scientifically, he is an obviously dangerous paranoiac with a terrific persecution complex; but of course nothing will be done about it, and he will die a more or less peaceful death after having done INCALCULABLE DAMAGE."

Commenting publicly thereon, Editor Edmondson retorted: "Emanating from a source for centuries mentally delusion-obsessed with a "Chosen People" complex, and physically by thousands of years of inbreeding, the foregoing might be considered a priceless tribute to selfless patriotic effort were it not for the fact that such ingrained condition could be accurately diagnosed as finally producing destructive madness that may have to be cured by drastic mass-surgical operation. However, the enemies of The Republic at last seem to know that they are in a real fight."

1200 BILLION DOLLAR PALESTINE STEAL

The above is heading placed over an Edmondson bulletin of March 19, 1936, reporting the receipt of "A Constitutional Crisis" proclamation issued by the British National League, prophetically describing the current Middle East Moslem revolutionary unrest as a result of Palestine Zionist Jewish State plans:

The proclamation reads:

"Unless we act to right the wrong situation in policy the Arabs of Palestine are doomed to increasing martyrdom, which in the end would arouse the whole Arab and Indian Moslem Worlds.

"Past British Governments through weakness in principle and action upon it * * * have unfortunately given the Dead Sea and Ruterberg Concessions into the hands of International Financiers. Mr. Felix Warburg, from whose group we borrowed the America Debt, is one of the powerful group of International Financiers at the center of the Dead Sea Concession, which is in a

foreign and mainly Jewish Control. At a great gathering in New York, Dr. Chaim Weizmann (Zionist Leader), stated in a public speech: 'The key to the doors of Palestine is in the pocket of the Jews of America.'

"The money values of the Dead Sea products have been estimated to be approximately 240 billion pounds sterling, including Potash, Bromine, Salt NaCl., Gypsum and Magnesium Chloride. In addition, Prof. Georges Claud estimates that gold in solution in the Dead Sea amounts to a value of five billion pounds sterling, and it can be extracted easily and economically.

"There is extreme danger in Great Britain in failing to handle the moral issues. The future of our own country and Palestine is most urgently at stake, as well as the future of the Arabs and the Indian Muslims in relation to us.

"Moslem opinion has been expressed in an historic cable from the All-India Moslem Conference, representing 72 million Moslems, as follows: 'The Moslems of India cannot tolerate Jewish Monopolies being created, which would soon make the proposed Jewish Home a purely Jewish State—as the Zionists clearly desire to establish in Palestine.'

"Foreign control of the Dead Sea means the World Economic Domination of International (Jewish) Finance, raising the gravest issues for Anglo-Saxon Civilization."

(Signed) "National League,
"M. Farquharson, President."

IEWISH MINORITY THREATENS!

The above captioned Edmondson bulletin of April 15, 1936, as below:

"The Jews of America, because of their NUMBERS, INTEREST and ABILITY, constitute A GREAT POLITICAL FORCE. They have not usurped this power; IT BELONGS TO THEM AS OF RIGHT! They are going to exercise it AS THEY SEE FIT! What are YOU going to DO about it?"—From an editorial of April 9, 1936, in the great Yiddish Daily, "THE DAY," of New York City, edited by Rabbi Samuel Margoshes.

And this is HOW they USE their "great political force:"

The Daily Worker of New York, Dec. 17, 1938, published the following damning confession: "As an expression of the fraternal relations exisiting between The Morning Freiheit, JEWISH language daily paper, and The Daily Worker, official organ of the COMMUNIST Party, the office staff of The Freiheit today presented WILLIAM BROWDER, N. Y. State Treasurer of The COMMUNIST Party, with a check representing their collective contribution of a day's pay. The money is to be used to help strengthen The Daily Worker, and SUPPORT it for the coming year. 'The SPIRIT accompanying this check is even more important than the money itself' said Browder, in accepting the gift."

The Jews of America 'number' about 4,228,000, (their official estimate) presumably based, as in Bibical times, upon MALES ALONE—which would give a total U. S. Jewish population of at least 8,500,000, or about a 7% minority. Based on "Passover Bread" requirements, it has been estimated that the Jews in America in 1920 numbered about 6,000,000—with 3,000,000 more seeking entrance—over 15 Million reported in the United States now.

What are WE going to do about it?

THIS is the answer of the Middle-Class American Patriotic Majority to the Jewish Minority:

The Republic of the United States of America was founded upon "A Declaration of Independence" conceived, not by an oriental Jewish but by a Christian Majority that, through supreme sacrifice, created the greatest freedom Constitution "ever struck off by the hand and brain of man," and with it established a nation that rose from poverty to enjoy prosperity and happiness—until the advent of the revolutionary Jewish Invasion.

WE ARE GOING TO DEMONSTRATE OUR CONTROL of the Destinies of the America bequeathed to us by our great Christian Forefathers.

In a renaissance of the "Spirit of '76," now rising, fighting under our historic crusading-cry "Liberty or Death!" WE are going to RESTITUTION-ALLY RECAPTURE what has been treacherously and predatorily seized through secret subversion of our unsuspecting good-will, tolerance and hospitality-PEACEFULLY, if we CAN, but MILITANTLY, if we MUST!

TRUTH CALLED "ABSURD"

The following is a self-explanatory publication of April 22, 1946:

Under date of April 16, 1936, Robert Edward Edmondson received the following letter from Dean Virginia C. Gildersleeve of Barnard College, Columbia University, New York City:

"As a good American, I wish to express my indignation at the un-American methods of propaganda which you are following in the absurd document entitled, 'U. S. Invisible Government.' This reached me through the mails on Monday.

"Great harm is being done by you and other persons who in this un-American manner are trying to stir up racial and religious prejudice and passion, hatred and fear, in the minds of the ignorant.

"It would, of course, seem to me entirely proper for you to attack the acts or policies of any of the persons whom you enumerate; but merely to imply that they are radicals. Reds and James seems to me scandalous

"If Frances Perkins and Judge Cardozo belong in your list of Moscow Reds, I hope that I, too, am entitled to a position there. Let me add that my descent is American for over 250 years on both sides of my family, and that, so far as I know, I have not a drop of Jewish or Russian blood in my veins—though what difference this would make, I do not know."

The following reply was sent to Miss Gildersleeve by Robert Edward Edmondson under date of April 22, 1936:

"I welcome your letter of April 16, 1936, gratuitiously attacking, under the self-styled title 'A Good American,' what you assume to characterize as my 'un-American methods of propaganda,' exemplified in a public document exposing the Jewish anti-Americanism of what has come to be signficantly known in every state by the various political appellations of "The Roosevelt Red Deal," 'The New Steal,' 'The Raw Deal,' and 'The Communistic Jew Deal.'

"Since you have 'indignantly' expressed yourself frankly, you will not deny me the same privilege.

"In order to complete the American background picture you draw with flegard to yourself, may I also lay before you the fact of my own Colonial ancestry that geneologists say extends beyond pre-Revolution days back to Robert of Scotland in the year 800 A.D.—which ought to dispose of any predilection for doctrines other than Anglo-Saxon—likely to be unfavorably inferred from your insinuation as to 'propaganda,' whose original meaning is to 'educate.'

"Further comparative background is provided by the fact that you, as Dean of Barnard College of the New York University—now notoriously known among patriots as 'Columbia, the Germ of the Nation' because of its un-American internationalism—at present hold a highly lucrative professional post, as against my position, namely, that of a \$50,000-a-year executive who has given up his regular business to unselfishly devote all his time, money and ability to a crusade whose aim is the liberation of America from an alien politico-economic-publicity subversion, of which you are apparently without knowledge notwithstanding the fact that your exceptional educational keystatus should have fully acquainted you with the overwhelming documentary evidence thereof.

"Now that our respective foundations have been established, may I proceed to analyze your denunciations seriatim?

"The 'Invisible Government' document (not sent to you from this office), to which you have taken belated exception—since it was first published in May, 1934, and revised in June, 1935—is attacked by you as 'absurd.' The New Webster International Dictionary meaning of 'absurd' is: 'Contrary to reason, inconsistent with common sense, opposed to manifest truth.' The said document is subheaded 'The Roosevelt Internationalist Minority Advisory Council at Washington,' under which appears an 'incomplete list of many unofficial and official powers behind Roosevelt Leadership, all apparently under Brandeis-Frankfurter-Morgenthau Jewish-Radical Minority influence—descriptions being taken from Jewish publications, the famous Dilling "Red Network" book, Congressional, Associated Press and other published records.' Surrounding a circle in which are the words 'Roosevelt Personal Government,' is arranged the following names, with title as supplied by the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933, wherein it was stated: 'The Roosevelt Administration has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration in American history; including Bernard M. Baruch, Unofficial President; Prof. Felix Frankfurter, Legal Advisor; Herbert Feis, Brains of the State Dept.; Henry Morgenthau, International Banker; Samuel Rosenman, Roosevelt's 'Right Arm,' and Justice Brandeis, 'New Deal Father,' who is designated by the N. Y. Times of January 28, 1934, as philosopher of the New Deal, whose NRA, 'is almost a composite of his dissenting opinions.'

"And is it possible that you did not read in the Saturday Evening Post of Oct. 26, 1935, the confession by General Johnson that Prof. Frankfurter is 'THE MOST INFLUENTIAL SINGLE INDIVIDUAL IN THE UNITED STATES,' owing to his 'invisible' power with the President. 'Frankfurter is the legal master-mind of the New Deal,' say Simon & Schuster in their 1934 book, 'The New Dealers.'

"I could go on almost indefinitely, quoting overwhelming evidence as to the 'reasonableness, common sense and truth' of this startling portrayal, which you so lightly brush aside as 'absurd.'

"Your implication that I am fanatically 'trying to stir up racial and religious prejudice and passion, hatred and fear' has a most familiar ring-representing a typical 'canned product' from a master factory, and being almost invariably used by Jewish Communist denunciators of all patriotic activities. As a matter of fact, among others, James P. Warburg, representative Jew, personally admitted to me in 1934 that religion does not enter into the Jew-Gentile controversy. I know of no American action against the religion of

Judaism, although, with other citizens, I strongly object to political religionists of any faith, meddling in governmental affairs, since our American philosophy properly contemplates complete separation of church and state.

"Being typical internationalists, constituting an imperium in imperio in all nations, to me, Jews have no legitmate claim to specific racial status, although they may have originally belonged to the Semites, of which 'race' Arabs and other peoples are also members.

"This Jewish Problem is largely economic because history shows that Jewry as a whole is predatorially materialistic, and self-confessedly so, in view of written expressions of their own authorities. Zionist Leader Herzl admits in his book, 'The Jewish State'—'When we Jews sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat; when we rise, there also arises our terrible power of the purse.' Dr. Oscar Levy deprecatingly wrote in 1920: 'Jewish elements provide the driving force for both Capitalism and Communism.' The logic of modern events proves the accuracy of this economic thesis.

"You object to the listing of Justice Cardozo among radicals. Can you deny that he has always voted in important New Deal Supreme Court decisions with 'Radical' Justice Brandeis? 'By their deeds shall ye know them!'

"Not being a churchman, I cannot be rightfully accused of religious fanaticism; but Secretary of Labor Perkins, who says she is a Christian, yet would be proud of Jewish blood did she have it, has largely surrounded herself with alien-minded and foreign born Jewish Radical associates in place of citizens loyal to the Christian-American ideals of Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln—and thereby brands herself not only as un-American, but as unfaithful to her professed religion. It is of course your privilege to align yourself with Mr. Cardozo and Miss Perkins.

"I agree with you that 'great harm' has been done—to the enemies of the Republic—by the Edmondson pro-American Crusade. There is also emphatic agreement on this point by the Los Angeles B'nai B'rith 'Messenger,' organ of the Jewish Kehillah, when it admits in its Feb. 21, 1936, issue that this patriotic movement has done 'incalculable damage.'

"My documentary record of a desperate two-year selfless attempt to peacefully enlighten deliberately blinded fellow-countrymen to the peril of civil war hidden in this Jewish Communism, challenges your charge of 'un-American stirring up' of strife. I will say to you that I consider any sacrifice justified, to redeem Washington and Lincoln's Republican Government.

"And the instantaneous welcome accorded the five million Pamphlets of Truth I have fortunately been instrumental in getting circulated from coast to coast, makes me supremely confident that I am not alone in that sentiment, or as to the correctness of my thesis and policy as to the Jewish anti-Americanism which is destroying the Republic.

"Many religious and other teachers seem to have been theoretically educated beyond their intellectual capacity to grasp and understand the 'practical realities' of the current super-crisis.

"To close, I will quote from a letter of May 11, 1934, answering Mr. Louis A. Freedman, N. Y. City, wherein I declared: 'Any minority seeking to rule the American majority will fail. In defence of Americanism, I would take exactly the same militant position were the present subversive Jewish influence exercised by a German, Irish, Russian or any racial, religious or other minority

group. YOUR concern is for the 5,000,000 Jews in the United States—MINE is for 125,000,000 citizens, including the Jewish minority. Which is TRUE Americanism?"

Miss Gildersleave replied April 23 to the above letter thus: "Thank you

Miss Gildersleeve replied April 23 to the above letter thus: "Thank you for printing my letter. I had thought of sending it to the newspapers. One always feels relieved at getting a protest of this sort off one's mind."

This is typical and confirmatory, namely; unable to make successful rebuttal, minds "theoretically educated beyond their intellectual capacity to grasp realities," either reply "I don't agree," or by diversion, silently disregard unanswerable direct logic supported by overwhelming evidence, fact and authority; but "you can't dodge the consequence of dodging your responsibility."

ECONOMIC MASTER-MIND BARUCH

From May 1, 1936 Edmondson bulletin:

"More than any other one person, Prof. Frankfurter is the legal mastermind of the New Deal."—Simon-Schuster in the 1934 "New Dealers."

Who is the "Economic Master-Mind" of the New Deal? See below:

"One of the key Roosevelt advisors is Bernard M. Baruch, a power in the Wilson Administration. In the absence of Secretary of State Hull and the President from Washington, Mr. Baruch is regarded as "Unofficial President."—Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933.

"When President Wilson went to Paris to draw up the Peace Treaty, Bernard M. Baruch went with him and served as the war-time President's Economic Advisor."—Boston Daily Globe of June 20, 1933.

In the 1934 book "Are These Things So?" appears this: Wilson's best friend was Bernard M. Baruch, who, heading a batch of 117 Jews, accompanied Wilson on his trip to the Peace Conference. He is listed in "Who's Who in America" as "Economic Advisor to the American Peace Commission."

"Bernard M. Baruch is called into frequent conferences with the President. He has financed many a Congressional campaign; and is surrounded by a praetorian guard of Senators, who hang on his every word. The figure of Baruch is swelling into enormous dimensions on the horizon of public life. He has been given credit for Hoover's appointment of Eugene Meyer, Jr., as Governor of the Federal Reserve Board. He is the Mystery Man of Washington and Wall Street."—From 1933 October "Fortune."

On Page 13080 of the Congressional Record of June 27, 1934, Vol. 78, No. 139, is printed:

"Following the World War Bernard M. Baruch appeared before a select Congressional Committee and testified to the fact that he virtually had complete control of the resources of the American nation during the war, saying: I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war."

"THERE HAS NOT BEEN AN ADMINISTRATION SINCE OUR ADVENT INTO THE GREAT WORLD WAR IN WHICH BARUCH HAS NOT BEEN A CHIEF POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ADVISOR, AND EVERY ADMINISTRATION THAT HAS LISTENED TO HIM HAS CARRIED US DEEPER AND DEEPER INTO FINANCIAL CHAOS."—Congressman L. T. McFadden of Penna.

The Associated Press on June 22, 1934, announced that Baruch was moving out of Wall Street to write his memoirs, but quoted him as saying: "I do not want anyone to think I am getting rusty and going to retire. I am not, positively. I AM JUST WHAT I SAID I WAS—A SPECULATOR."

Incidentally, Baruch was quoted on Sept. 25, 1935, by the Chicago Tribune as saving: "I believe national pride (patriotism) a lot of nonsense."

President Roosevelt unctuously denounced the speculators and "money-changers" of Wall Street.

WHY WAS HIS "CHIEF ECONOMIC ADVISOR" A SELF-CON-FESSED SPECULATOR, WHOM WALL STREET HAS ALWAYS RE-GARDED AS ONE OF ITS MOST PROMINENT STOCK MARKET OPERATORS AND ASSOCIATE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS?

PROTESTANTISM WARNS JEWS OF "DRYING UP" TOLERANCE (A Waking-up reprint published in a May 22, 1936 Edmondson Bulletin)

What is being called "the biggest Protestant news in many years," has just made its appearance in the "Christian Century." The following are from the April 29 and May 13, 1936, issues:

"Most non-Jewish Americans know little of the aspirations of the Jew. When they learn, their complacency in present ignorance is likely to be GREATLY DISTURBED.

"Jewry is a mutual benefit organization; it is also a propagandist organization. The Jewish System violates the safeguards which can alone justify the continuance of factional groups in any democratic society. A democratic society is peculiarly sensitive to violation of its sacred unities. There can be no unity; nor can there be social health in the American community, so long as any group invokes the holy sanctions of religion, and the inviolable solidarity of national life, in the perpetuation of permanent and IRRECONCILABLE FACTION-ALISM.

"The time for realistic discussion cannot be indefinitely postponed. The tension between Jews and Christians cannot be effectively resolved by appeal to the sentiment of mutual tolerance. In a problem of this kind, tolerance operates in a one-way street. It is exercised by the majority, not by the minority.

"American Society is an organism, and, as such, all its vital forces tend toward SOLIDARITY, UNITY, INTEGRATION. Any unassimilated element of the population is bound to have trouble, BECAUSE IT IS BOUND TO MAKE TROUBLE.

"If the Christian Community were once convinced that an impassable gulf is fixed between itself and the Jewish Community, ITS SPIRIT OF TOLERANCE WOULD SHRIVEL UP. TOLERANCE CANNOT LIVE WITH DESPAIR

"The Jew will never command the respect of the non-Jewish culture in which he lives so long as HE HUDDLES BY HIMSELF, nursing his own uniqueness," cherishing his tradition as something precious to him but which cannot be conveyed to others, nor participated in by others.

"The Christian World would like to know what specific values Judaism has to contribute to civilization which Christianity does not likewise possess. A Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take 'pot-luck' with humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot escape the SUSPICION that it is hoarding its treasure for A SELFISH PURPOSE."

(1937 Addenda)

"JEWRY, THE PROTYPE OF NAZISM"

The following is a sequel reprint from an editorial in the Christian Century magazine of Chicago of June 9, 1937, pages 734-5-6:

"What is the Jewish Problem? Jewry is a racial minority which conceives its racial integrity as the permanent basis of a distinctive culture. * * * They are an hereditary group. * * * Can democracy suffer an hereditary minority to perpetuate itself as a permanent minority?

"The simple and naked fact is that Judaism rests upon an impossible basis. IT IS TRYING TO PLUCK THE FRUITS OF DEMOCRACY WITHOUT YIELDING ITSELF TO THE PROCESSES OF DEMOCRACY.

"Conceding without reserve that our Jewish brethren have the right to their faith and to the practice of it in whatever forms are seemly and precious to them, we are bound to say that THEY HAVE NO RIGHT IN A DEMOCRACY to remove their faith from the normal influences of the democratic process by insulating it behind the walls of a racial and cultural solidarity; and we are further bound to say that DEMOCRACY CANNOT GUARANTEE OUR JEWISH BRETHREN AGAINST THE EMERGENCE OF A CRISIS IN WHICH THE PREJUDICE AND ANGER GENERATED BY THEIR LONG RESISTANCE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS WILL FLAME UP TO THEIR GREAT HURT.

"The situation in which the Jewish Problem arises is in large measure Jewry's own creation. * * * We hold that the Jew is responsible, in a high degree, and that no solution of his problem is possible until his own degree of responsibility is recognized. The first step toward its recognition is to discern that his determination to maintan a permanent RACIAL STATUS IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH DEMOCRACY.

"The root cause of the Jewish Problem is the Jew's immemorial and pertinacious obsession with an illusion, the illusion that his race, his people, are the object of the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of their racial integrity and separateness as the medium through which, soon or late, will be performed some mighty act involving human destiny.

"FROM PRE-CHRISTIAN DAYS THE JEWS' BELIEF in their divinely hallowed racial uniqueness provoked UNFAVORABLE REACTION. * * * The Jewish Problem of today is rooted NOT CHIEFLY IN RELIGIOUS SOIL, but in the soil of common human psychology.

"How can the vicious circle be broken by Jewish initiative? In only one way, as it seems to us, namely, for prophets to arise in Judaism who will begin to proclaim the terrible truth: That Judaism has been FEEDING ITS RACIAL PRIDE for milleniums on an illusion; that its marryrdom is in large measure self-invited; that its racial integrity is no more important in God's sight than any other race's integrity; that race is of so little importance in God's sight that he has not preserved the integrity of a single people now living, including the Jewish people. * * *

"Their idea of an integral race, with its own exclusive culture, hallowed and kept unified by a racial religion, IS ITSELF THE PROTOTYPE OF NAZISM."

For publicly exposing the Jewish Politico-Economic Monopoly System, Robert Edward Edmondson was indicted through Jewish Mayor LaGuardia of N. Y. City on a charge of libeling and inciting "all persons of the Jewish Religion"—which he never attacked.

Having directly attacked the Religion of Judaism as such, will Editor Morrison of The Christian Century now be haled to court on a charge of libeling and inciting a community to commit a breach of the peace?

(1937 Addenda)

JEWISH RELIGION "PRACTICES" A MENACE TO GENTILE STATES? (The above headed an Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 1, 1937)

What does the word "JEW" signify?

"A RELIGIOUS Minority," is an answer by Dr. Sidney E. Goldstein, Chairman of the Social Justice Committee of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, largest organization of its kind in the world.

"Jews constitute PURELY A RELIGIOUS SECT," is a statement made in "The U. S. and German Jewish Persecutions," by the late Jewish "legal light," Max J. Kohler, who says further: "We Jews constitute 'a RELIGIOUS Minority' in the U. S."

"The term 'A Way of Life," by Rabbi Lewis Mann of Chicago Sinai Temple, HAS BEEN GENERALLY ACCEPTED BY JEWRY AS A COMPLETE ANSWER to the question 'What is the Jewish Religion?" That statement is from a book "From Pharaoh to Hitler," by Chicago Jewish Author Bernard J. Brown, who is a lawyer.

"Judaism is essentially a religion of LAW," says the London Jewish Chronicle of Aug. 13, 1937. This follows a statement by Moses Mendelssohn, a noted Jewish authority, that "Judaism is revealed LEGISLATION"—as quoted in "The History of the Jews" by Jewish Historian Graetz.

Rabbi K. Kohler, in a 1900 "Manual for Schools and Homes," entitled "Guide for Instruction in Judaism," Page 41, says:

"The Mission of the Jewish People is to unite mankind in spirit by their monotheistic truth and their work for righteousness and peace. ISRAEL IS THE MESSIAH—God's anointed among the nations."

"Judaism is fundamentally anti-Christian-London Jewish World of Mar. 15, 1923.

"The ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the FINEST ideals of Judaism."--London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919.

Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel says in his 1924 book "You Gentiles:" "We Jews cannot conceive of a duality—religion and life. I might say 'We and God grew up together.' In the heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Between Gentile and Jew there lies an unbridgeable gulf. The two ways of life are opposed in mortal enmity. We thank God for having made us different from you." (Pharisaical prayer).

"There is only ONE way in which the American People can escape Fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing 'A THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY."—Resolution by the Central Conference of American Rabbis, printed in the N. Y. "Times" of Sept. 13, 1936.

Jews Against Nationalism

"What stands in our way everywhere in the world is modern nationalism. That is our chief enemy. We are on the side of Liberalism against Nationalism. That is our only safety." This is a quotation from "Race, Nation or Religion," by Dr. Solomon B. Freehof.

Jewish Author Bernard Lazare in his book "Anti-Semitism," makes these statements: "By the very fact of denying the divinity of Christ, the Jews place themselves as enemies of the social order, SINCE THIS ORDER IS BASED ON CHRISTIANITY.

The N. Y. Jewish National "Day" of Feb. 17, 1937, printed the following: "The Jewish Veterans of the U. S. ARE MOVING in the direction of having a bill introduced in Congress PROHIBITING THE SPREAD OF RACIAL OR RELIGIOUS PROPAGANDA AND BARRING SUCH PROPAGANDA FROM THE MAILS."

"STRANGER THAN FICTION," by Rabbi Lewis Browne, says: "Jewish histories rarely mention the name of Karl Marx, though in his life and spirit he was FAR TRUER to the Mission of Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. His book, "Capital," is called the Bible of the SOCIALIST movement."

Dr. Oscar Levy, English Jew, wrote the following in a preface to the book by Pitt-Rivers (1920) entitled "World Significance of the Russian Revolution:"

"Are not the Jews the inventors of the Chosen People Myth, and is not this obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation? We Jews have grievously erred. We who have posed as having given to the world 'the' savior, are today nothing else than its seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners. We who have promised you a New Heaven have given you a New Hell."

"Holyday Prayers, a New Ritual for New Year and Day of Atonement," 1936, Bloch Pub. Co., N. Y. City, contains the following Kol Nidre prayer under the heading "Evening Service for Atonement."

"All vows and self-prohibitions, oaths, vows of abstinence and promise, vows with self-imposed penalties and obligations, which we may vow, swear, promise and bind ourselves until the next day of atonement—may it come to us in happiness—we repent them all. MAY THEY BE ABSOLVED, CANCELLED AND MADE NULL AND VOID, WITHOUT POWER OR BINDING FORCE. MAY SUCH VOWS, SELF-PROHIBITIONS AND OATHS BE CONSIDERED AS NON-EXISTENT."

From Jewish Encyclopedia, Page 541,—"Many judges refused to allow Jews to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections chiefly on this Kol Nidre prayer."

"We want all this Christmas propaganda stopped. The masses of the Jewish people of America have a right to demand from the educational system of the U. S. that it KEEP CHRISTMAS OUT of public schools." N. Y. Jewish National "Day" of Dec. 14, 1935.

Rabbi Levinger's "History of the Jews in the U. S.," says that "of the 4,200,000 Jews in the U. S. in 1928, fully 3,500,000 were of EAST EUROP-EAN birth or descent." In other words, 82% are descended from Asiatic Mongol-Jews.

"The Bolshevist Revolution was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking and discontent. What Jewish idealism and discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind and heart ARE TENDING TO PROMOTE IN OTHER COUNTRIES."—American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920.

"The ONLY way to induce the American President to come into the World War, was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine. The Zionists carried out their part AND HELPED BRING AMERICA INTO THE WAR."—British Propaganda Agent, S. Landman, in the London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. 7, 1935. 126,000 Americans were killed and 234,000 wounded in the World War.

"This is a Christian Nation," is an extract from the "Holy Trinity" case decision by U. S. Supreme Court per Justice Brewer, February 29, 1892.

STATEMENT TO ASSOCIATED PRESS (From Edmondson Bulletin of May 28, 1936)

Informing Robert Edward Edmondson that New York Representative Samuel Dickstein had introduced a bill in Congress to investigate the "anti-Semitic activities" of the Edmondson Crusade, in connection with the so-called "Black Legion" developments in Michigan, the Associated Press, asking for "comment on Dickstein," requested a statement May 27, 1936—which was supplied in writing as below; and which of course was not reproduced in the newspapers, thereby again proving the thesis of Jew-control.

Why comment on Dickstein? This alien-minded un-American-actioned, international foreign-born Jew from Russia, who assumes to teach patriotism to native citizens who have absorbed it for generations, would not be in his present position were Congressional district-representation based on citizenship instead of alien population.

I DARE DICKSTEIN TO LET ME TESTIFY BEFORE HIS COM-MITTEE AS TO THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, ABOUT THE JEWISH ANTI-AMERICAN CONSPIR-ACY THAT IS COMMUNISTICALLY DESTROYING THE REPUBLIC, AND GUARANTEE A PUBLIC BROADCAST THEREOF THROUGH THE METROPOLITAN PRESS

For the thousandth time, I repeat: I am not opposed to Jews as individuals or as to their religion or race; but I am unalterably against what the Jewish System is DOING, by Financing Communistic Civil War, TO ENSLAVE THE UNITED STATES.

Investigations of the Edmondson Agency during the past two years by the Department of Justice, Post Office, and Dickstein's "Nazi" Committee, invariably developed the fact that I have been merely exercising my constitutional rights of free press and free speech—under handicap, for my mail has been constantly tampered with.

If, as alleged, there is in existence a six-million "vigilante anti-Semitic semi-military organization" of Americans, the Jewish exodus rush from the United States would make the departure from Egypt look like a one-horse parade. I have no knowledge of such a body.

Catholicism in Europe is apparently becoming aware of the reality of the menace. Read this public confirmation: "The Jewish Spirit threatens to corrode our economic and social life," declared the Federal Union of Catholic Youth

in Vienna, Austria, on April 3, 1936, according to an Associated Press cable. "Polish Jewry is an avowed enemy of the Catholic religion; Jews are behind the bolshevik and socialist forces now attacking our church." That was in a cable recently published by the Chicago Tribune, according to the James True Weekly Industrial Report of Feb. 29, 1936. The February (1936) Catholic Gazette of London, under a heading, "The Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church," printed a sensational article detailing proceedings at a secret Jewish Society meeting in Paris, at which a protocolic program of attack on the Catholic Church was outlined. There was circulated recently in Europe this extract from the "Civilta Cattolica," a Vatican publication: "The Jewish Peril menaces the whole world, in particular the Christian nations."

"DICKSTEIN'S OFFICE REPORTED TO US TODAY THAT HIS HOUSE RESOLUTION TO INVESTIGATE THE BLACK LEGION, EDMONDSON ECONOMIC SERVICE AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS, DID NOT PASS."—Report of June 29, 1936, received from the James True Associates, Washington, D. C.

After the introduction of the Dickstein Bill the "advance Edmondson testimony" pamphlet "Proof of a Jewish Conspiracy to Communize America and Rule the World," was sent to Congressmen, who apparently did not like the Jewish "Gent" in the legislative woodpile.

"DISTRUST OF JEWS" IN BRITISH OFFICIALDOM (From an Edmondson May 31, 1936, Bulletin)

W. B. Ziff, Zionist Organization officer, writes in the N. Y. Herald-Tribune of May 31, 1936, as follows:

"Implicit in the viewpoint of British Government officials is a general anti-Semitism and distrust of the Jews. Many in high positions believe vaguely in the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion, the alleged inner Jewsh conspiracy to rule the world. A heavy literature is extant in England on this subject. Col. A. H. Lane's book "Alien Menace," in which the Zionists are accused of being the shock troops of this subterranean attempt at world conquest, has gone through seven or eight editions. Volumes by Lady Queenborough, Nesta H. Webster (Author of "World Revolution," "Secret Societies," etc.) and others, all of the same tenor, have been printed in number-less editions, and patronized largely by the anti-Jewish sections of British officialdom."

JEW-JAILED FOR PREACHING PATRIOTISM

The following is self-explanatory:

In Cell 113, "Tombs" Jail, "Jew York," Friday afternoon, June 12, 1936. In "The Land of the Free(?) and Home of the Brave" (?), I, Robert Edward Edmondson, Preacher of Patriotism, Christian Editor and Publisher, am editing my "X-Ray" of June 13 behind the bars among "other criminals" in a notorious prison. Below is my understanding of the situation:

This "commitment" follows a two-year crusade of preaching real Americanism in an effort to awaken and enlighten Americans blinded by an alien-controlled press; and follows arbitrary summons, alleging criminal libel—unbacked by bill of particulars—issued personally by Jewish Mayor LaGuardia of N. Y. City on June 8, 1936. To me, this is a concrete demonstration of my fundamental thesis that "The Jewish Minority Rules the American Majority." To illustrate more technically:

NO BILL OF COMPLAINT

Since the Mayor failed to specify charges in his criminal libel summons, my counsel took the position that a citizen cannot answer charges until he knows what they are—and refused to allow me to be publicly examined at the appointed court hour of 10:30 on June 10, demanding a bill of particulars from Jewish Magistrate Mogilesky—who presided when LaGuardia's "pain" (in his stomach) prevented his "sitting," as originally proclaimed. Threats to issue a warrant for my arrest did not materialize, apparently for the reason that, if a criminal libel charge could not be sustained, then Edmondson might have basis for suit against the city as to civil liability. Instead, the Mayor's prosecutor promised to supply the required bill of particulars at a postponed hearing at 11 A.M., June 12—at which time the charges were completely withdrawn, with LaGuardia saying he planned to go to the ball game—with his "pain."

ARE JEWS GOING TO RIOT?

In the Mayor's letter to the District Attorney, demanding criminal libel action against Edmondson, it was alleged that my literature tended to "incite to riot." Who? Jews? And against whom? They are my only enemy. Yet I have steadfastly advocated a settlement of the Economic Jewish Problem by ballot versus violence or bullet. Documentary evidence proves that. LaGuardia also calls my reports untruthful, whereas they have been dramatized reproductions of the records of fact and authority. The charge that I, a non-churchman, have been preaching religious bigotry, is laughable. Have I attacked Catholicism, for instance? I have repeatedly announced that I am not against Judaism or any faith or race, but against Jewish anti-Americanism or anti-Americanism by any other minority.

The Jewish Problem is neither religious nor racial, in my judgment—we are in a self-preservation fight against JEWISH ECONOMIC PIRACY.

PUT IN CELL 113

Now, on the afternoon of June 11, I was arrested on a warrant for "publishing a libel," under three indictments by the New York County Grand Jury, complainants being in this order of preference: (1) The Jewish Religion, No. 209220. (2) Virginia C. Gildersleeve, Dean of Barnard College, Columbia University, No. 209221; (3) Frances Perkins, Secretary of Labor, member of Roosevelt's Supreme Council, No. 209222. I was paroled over night in the custody of my attorney, Mr. John S. Wise, Jr., of 135 W. 16th St., N. Y. City, pending bail next morning.

Abner Distillator, who informs me he is Jewish, endorsed the indictment as acting foreman.

Of the fifteen who have told me they served in finding this indictment, six told me they were Jewish. They are Jerome S. Blumauer, Samuel Rosenberg, Abner Distillator, Jacob Abraham, Mervin I., Lane and Harry B. Lieber.

Henry J. Rosenbaum refused to see me or tell me whether or not he is a Jew.

A. Leigh Robbins, Moses Goldsmith and Marcel H. Stieglitz refused to state whether or not they are Jews but made no claim to being Gentiles.

I am familiar with the characteristics of Jewish people, having lived among the millions in New York many years and these three to me present definite appearances of being thoroughly Jewish and likewise their names are usual Jew names.

Only Messrs. Moe, Smith, O'Brien and Blauvelt, who remember serving on the case, claim to be Gentiles.

Mr. Patton says he is Gentile. Mr. Hennessey told me he is a Christian.

Peter McDonnell is reported to me to be a Gentile but I have not been able to see or talk to him.

From my knowledge of these Grand Jurors it is obvious that no sixteen could be picked from them without a large Jewish contingent.

It seems to me that of those who found the indictment the majority must have been Jews.

VIOLATED GRAND JURORS OATH

The oath taken by the Grand Jurors in the Libel Indictment reads as follows:

"You *** shall DILIGENTLY INQUIRE, and TRUE presentment make, of all such matters and things as shall be given you in charge; the counsel of the People of this state, your fellows' and your own, you shall keep secret; you shall present (indict) no person from envy, HATRED or MALICE; nor shall you leave any one unpresented through fear, favor, affection, reward, or hope thereof; but you shall present all things TRULY as they come to your knowledge, according to the best of your understanding: so help you God!"

PUBLICATIONS EDUCATIONAL—NOT MOBINCITING

ROBERT EDWARD EDMONDSON, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

I am the defendant, being charged with committing certain alleged misdemeanors of criminal libel.

That I am a native born Aryan Christian American, a citizen of the United States of America, past sixty years of age, and my business career includes nearly forty years in journalism as reporter, editor, publisher, financial writer and investment economist, from coast to coast; that politically, I am non-partisan, pro-Constitution, Pro-National, anti-International and anti-Communist; not a member of any secret society; financially, modestly independent, with no entangling alliances; religion, not a churchman but a believer in Christian Principles; by ancestry, native American, chiefly Scotch descent, pre-Revolution; a resident and citizen of the State of New York; and that I have never been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor.

That my long and varied business and professional experience has provided me with knowledge which enabled me to identify positively the sinister Jewish Leadership forces which are subverting American Political, Religious, Economic and Social life, and raising a mysterious wall against recovery.

That I have repeatedly announced that I am not against Jews because of their religion, as a race, a people or as individuals, but because Jewish Leadership is actively anri-American, is attempting to jettison the American Political Philosophy and take over the Country, and that I would continue to be anti-Jewish until Jewry repudiated such subversion. Were the offender any other than the Jewish minority, my attitude would be precisely the same. This problem is the higgest and most accute thing in the world today. It is an abstract economic problem so far as immediacy is concerned, but it is born of an essentially evil philosophy that has evolved a satanic system the chief weapon of which is monetary.

Knowing that there was but one course, that pitiless publicity is the only cure for public evils, in 1934 I started on a campaign to expose Jewish Anti-Americanism and Talmudic Communism which has been called "The Code of Hell": a "Rabbi Racket" that victimizes its own followers; an international "Satanic System" subverting France, Britain, Germany and Russia, causing the present depression and moving to take over the United States through Jewish-Radical administration.

From the start I have been under no illusions or misapprehension as to acute personal dangers involved in this pro-American crusade: but, with passionate conviction, I would be false to patriotic duty to allow such considerations to divert me from exposing to my countrymen the Cause of Communism that is destroying The Republic.

That since the beginning of my campaign to educate all Americans to the subversive activities of the Jewish Internationalists to Sovietize our Country, I have written, published and distributed some 200 odd bulletins treating of such activities in the political and educational life of America, and among which bulletins are included the 84 bulletins incorporated in the aforesaid three indictments by reference and annexed hereto; that all bulletins so written, published and distributed by me state the true facts, with fair comment on my part as to the effect of the principles advocated by and through the subversive agents and organizations of Jewish Internationalism; are all of public interest and privileged in character.

LIBEL INDICTMENT AN OUTRAGE

The following is from the court argument of John S. Wise, Jr., Counsel for Robert Edward Edmondson, before General Sessions Judge Allen Aug. 4, 1936, in the libel action started by N. Y. Jewish Mayor LaGuardia:

"This is a motion for the inspection of the Grand Jury's minutes * * * and general relief. If you will read the indictments I think you will see that they do not ALLEGE ANY CRIME under Section 1340 of the Penal Code—to the end that ANY PERSON was injured. One indictment is for libeling every member of the Jewish Religion.

"The majority of this Grand Jury, by their own statements, were JEWISH, and returned an indictment against this defendant for injury TO THEM-SELVES, and WITHOUT STATING WHAT THAT INJURY WAS.

"It was the duty of the grand jury to act impartially and protect defendant's substantial rights. How can a New York jury indict a man for libeling all of the Jews in the world. There is no such indictment on record any place. Still, it seems you must not mention Jew.

"The pacriots of the whole country are complimenting the defendant for his activity in trying to eliminate socialism led by Jews such as have destroyed Russia.

"We are entitled to inspect the jury's minutes. We should not be subjected to trial without due process of law. It is an outrage.

"The Grand Jury violated its oath. It was sworn to act impartially and justly in proper protection of this defendant's substantial rights. An inspection ought to reveal facts on which every member of this grand jury should be subject to indictment for oppression."

Notwithstanding the foregoing, on Aug. 21, 1936, without opinion or explanation, Judge Allen refused to permit inspection of the minutes.

The following documentation accompanied the presentation to the court, with a mass of similar data.--

THE COMMUNIST PLOT DETAILED

• (1) ECONOMIC: To abolish private ownership; to establish state monopolies; to bring about centralization; to encourage greed; to lower ideals of craftsmanship; to promote unemployment; to establish a World Bank.

• "(2) POLITICAL: To secure control of the press, broadcasting, screen and stage—to influence public opinion; to put agents on all Gentile councils, in confidential posts such as secretaryships, to maintain espionage, to break up Gentile organizations from the inside by fomenting dissensions; to decry patriotism and pride of race; and in the name of progress, evolution, universal peace and human brotherhood, set up 'Internationalism'—undermining national unity and weakening existing governments; to bring about disarmament and establish an international police force controlled by Jewish League of Nations.

• "(3) SOCIOLOGICAL: 'To set up plutoctacy; encourage vulgar display and extravagance; to provoke the projectariat to envy, discontent, revolt and class or civil war.

• "(4) ETHICAL: To corrupt morals, weaken the marriage-bond, destroy home family life and abolish inheritance.

• "(5) AESTHETIC: To foster the cult of the ugly, debasing, decadent and degenerate in art, music, literature, theatre.

• "(6) RELIGIOUS: To undermine Gentile creeds and churches, and propogate crazy cults, unhealthy mysticism, pseudo-science and sham philosophies."

"CHOSEN PEOPLE MYTH"

"Race is humbug," is the conclusion of Jewish Author Brown in "From Pharaoh to Hitler," in a chapter devoted to "The Race Myth." He asserts that there is less ground for the premise that Jews are a race than those who hold themselves to be Nordics or Teutons. Referring to the maddening mixture of the races of mankind, he intimates that Russian Jews are descendants of Russian Mongolians who accepted Judaism, because the race of membership in a chosen race is attractive. Historian Max Radin is quoted as saying that the only significance modern anthropologists will permit us to attach to the phrase 'Semitic Race' is language."

PREMIER BLUM'S MORAL CODE

LEON BLUM, the present PRIME MINISTER OF FRANCE, wrote in his book: "Du Marriage:"

"They (young girls) will return from their lovers as naturally as they now return from having Tea with a friend. Virginity, thrown off gaily and early, will no longer exercise this singular restraint which comes from modesty, dignity and a sort of fear . . . I have never discerned what there is about incest which is really repulsive. I merely note that it is natural and frequent for sister and brother to be lovers."

In "The Hidden Hand" monthly of September, 1920, published by the Britons Society of England, is published a "Protocol," which students of the Jewish Problem believe furnished the basis for the detailed subversion "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," called "forgeries" by Jews; alleged to have been from an address before Zionisis in 1897; catried secretly into Russia in 1902; and from there into the British Museum in 1905. The following is quoted from the "Hidden Hand":

"In our last issue we published in the Spectator letters a Protocol of a century ago. La Vieille France has gone one better. The Revue des etudes Juives, FINANCED BY JAMES DE ROTHSCHILD, published in 1880 two documents which showed how true the Protocols are in saying that the Learned Elders of Zion have been carrying on their plans for centuries."

"ROTHSCHILD PROTOCOL"

"On January 1, 3, 1489, Chemor, Jewish Rabbi of Arles in Provence, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat at Constantinople, for advice, as the people of Arles were threatening the synagogues. What should they do? This is the reply:

"Dearly beloved brethren in Moses: We have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes you are enduring. The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following.

"'As for what you say that the King of France obliges you to become Christians: Do it, since you cannot do otherwise; BUT LET THE LAW OF MOSES BE KEPT IN YOUR HEARTS.

"As for what yo usay about the command to despoil you of your goods (the law was that on becoming converted the Jews would give up their possessions); Make your sons merchants, that little by little THEY MAY DESPOIL THE CHRISTIANS OF THEIRS.

"'As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: Make your sons doctors and apothecaries, THAT THEY MAY TAKE AWAY CHRISTIANS' LIVES.

"'As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: Make your sons canons and clerics that they may DESTROY CHURCHES.

"As for the many other vexations you complain of: Arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always MIX THEMSELVES UP WITH THE AFFAIRS OF STATE, in order that by putting Christians under your yoke, YOU MAY DOMINATE THE WORLD, AND BE AVENGED ON THEM.

"Do not swerve from THIS ORDER that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, YOU WILL REACH THE ACTUALITY OF POWER.

"Signed V. S. S. V. FF., Prince of the Iews, 21st Casley (November), 1489."

A JEW ON NATIONHOOD

In "From Pharaoh to Hitler," Jewish Author Bernard J. Brown makes a very ex-

hausrive legal analysis of the claim to "Tewish Nationhood," as below;

"The Jewish National Complex" is the title of one chapter of this remarkable book, which says Jewish Nationalists hold that the Jewish Nation stands separate and apart even though Jews are enjoying rights and privileges of the country where they live.

Dramatically, the truism is held up that Jews will surely be feared and hated if they

IEWS?" he asks. "Do we expect to contribute the religion we have abandoned?"

He holds that logicians are forced to conclude that demand for Jewish nationhood in the lands where they live is "subversive of national unity." He exclaims: "In one breath, our people claim to be internationalists, and in the next, they assert that Jewish nationhood is an ineluctable fact."

The author maintains that the Jewish Problem cannot be solved with

Zionism—all the Jews will not consent to settle in Palestine

MORE DOCUMENTATION

"Out of jail on bail" your petitioner continued to publish and broadcast exposures of additional Jewish anti-Americanism when new documentation was received, among which were bulletins indicated hereinafter:

JEWISH VETERANS ANSWERED

The Jewish War Veterans of the U. S., Department of New York, by Harry Bloomfield, Welfare & Service Officer, submitted June 11, 1936, the following questions to Robert Edward Edmondson:

"What do you consider a good American, and by what standard?

"In the last war the Jewish Race contributed 250,000 men to the armed forces of our country. I, as one of them, consider myself a 100% American. 14,000 men of our faith lie in Flanders' Field. Are they good Americans?

"Do you know that men of our faith fought in the revolution and helped to build this country?

"What did you do in defense of your country?

"What makes you take the stand you do in printing your literature?"

First, I call your attention to the definition below on Americanism as promulgated in February, 1927, by the Commanders in Chief of the Grand Army of the Republic, United Spanish War Veterans, Division of Foreign Wars, National Commanders of the American Legion and Disabled Veterans of the World War—now broadcast by the Americanization Department of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States.

"Americanism is an UNFAILING love of country; Loyalty to ITS institutions and ideals; Eagerness to defend it against ALL enemies; UNDIVIDED ALLEGIANCE to the flag."

That is also my conception of Americanism.

I do not find the name "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S." in the above list of endorsers. Why? May I ask why you use the title "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S., instead of "American War Veterans"?

Is it possible that the name "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S." is omitted as endorsing the Americanism definition heretofore quoted because Jewish War Veterans put JEWRY FIRST; that they maintain a DIVIDED allegiance; that they are not eager to defend America against ALL ENEMIES—within as well as without? Do not overlook the fact that a vast non-Jewish Majority also died in the World War. They are entitled to first consideration. It goes without saying

that all soldiers of America who made the Supreme Sacrifice proved themselves "good Americans." I honor them. And our disabled veterans should receive the greatest care our nation can give them.

WHAT EDMONDSON DID IN THE WORLD WAR

What did I do in defense of my country during the World War?

Unfortunately, at the time of the war, I was past military age, and an army liability; but I came out of the fight financially stripped whereas Henry Ford has estimated that 73% of New York war millionaires were Jews; and he said in a N. Y. World interview on Feb. 17, 1921, that his investigations indicated that International Jewish Financiers had caused the war.

I have documentary evidence proving (1) my profitless daily and aggressive co-operation with the Government in World-War work during the entire conflict; (2) editorials in my publications demanding conscription of ALL the nation's labor and resources in place of drafting soldiers only; (3) published strong opposition to Wilson's demand that the United States join the League of Nations—now denounced by the National Workers' Party of Britain as "an instrument of war." Zionist Leader Sokoloff declared on Aug. 22, 1922, "The League of Nations is a Jewish idea; we created it after a fight of 25 years."

What makes me attack the Jewish anti-Americanism that is destroying my country?

Doesn't the question answer itself to any veteran-patriot? I would take precisely the same stand were offending leadership German, Russian, Irish or Italian. I have repeatedly declared that I am not against Jews as individuals as to their religion or race. This is a fight for self-preservation.

Do you ask special privilege for a minority. Jews are entitled to MIN ORITY rights, BUT NOT MAJORITY POWER.

"ZIONISTS PUT II S INTO WORLD WAR"

Read this confession by S. Landman, former British War Propaganda Agent, in the London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. 7, 1936: "The only way to induce the American President to come into the war was to secure the cooperation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine. The Zionists carried out their part AND HELPED TO BRING AMERICA INTO THE WORLD WAR"

IS THAT AMERICANISM?

Now, in my opinion, you Jewish War Veterans have an unprecedented opportunity to perform a super-service not only to Jews but Gentiles. The hell-fire of war should have purified you. Has it also made you self-reliant and independent? Has it courageously individualized you? HAS IT FULLY AMERICANIZED YOU? I ask these questions since you apparently "huddle" by your-selves under the title "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S.," from which legion Gentiles are barred, although Jews may enter the American Legion.

If you will now boldly put Americanism above Jewry and place all your resources unreservedly behind this Crusade for 100% Americanism—which means that you will have to completely submerge all Jewish interest—a patriotic Gentile-Jew concert of action would promptly smash this predatory solidarity that is destroying us.

I am unalterably opposed to government by dictatorship of any kind—including the Roosevelt Jewish Radical Regime.

I challenge the patriotism of American Jewish War Veterans to clean the House of Jewry and oust its false leadership.

If that be what Jewish Mayor LaGuardia calls inciting to riot and Treason to America, LET HIM MAKE THE MOST OF IT!

1938 ADDENDA JEW VETS STOP FREE SPEECH

The address below was to have been delivered March 20, 1938, before the Russian National League in New York City by Robert Edward Edmondson, but the lessor of the "Church of All Nations," the place selected, refused to permit such free speech because references unfavorable to Jews necessarily appeared throughout.

[Telephone and other messages were received from many persons by Robert Edward Edmondson, asking if an advertisement were true that he would speak at the Church of All Nations, saying they would like to attend. He replied to them, as he did to newspaper reporters, that, as he was denied free speech as to the truth about Jewish Anti-Americanism, the only subject which he publicly discussed, he of course could not appear.]

The action of the "Church of All Nations" was probably influenced by this item in the N. Y. Journal of March 17, 1938: "Charging that a scheduled meeting Sunday of the Russian National League of Americans was to be a 'Jewbaiting rally,' the East Side Post of the Jewish War Veterans announced today that it would march upon the meeting and stop it in a nice way or any way we can.' Murray Lipkin, Commander of the Post, warned that 5,000 Jewish Veterans would be on hand to block the rally on 2nd Avenue, in the 'Church of All Nations.' Among the speakers will be Robert Edward Edmondson, anti-Semitic pamphleteer, now facing trial on charge of criminally libeling * * * the Jewish Religion."

THE AGONY OF RUSSIA (The Undelivered Speech)

To Russian Exiled Patriots and Citizens of the American Republic:

As a native American, I stretch out to White Russians in the United States the hand of friendship. I wish I could speak in your language. I might then better express to you my deep sympathy.

I love my country—you love your fatherland. Those of you who remain its subjects, are virtually men and women without a country. You have been driven from your homes.

I am sorry you have been subjected to Jewish Communist persecution in this country. Those of you who have become militant fellow-citizens to the point of joining our national guard, have not been spared.

But you can work for Russia HERE. You can now perform a double patrictic duty. Your foe is our foe. We patriots must all unite and fight the common enemy—lewish Communism.

We peaceful people of Russia and America have not guarded our rights. We have been too generous, too tolerant, too hospitable. Such is fertile ground for the Jewish Communist Revolutionary in which to sow seeds of poison. Eternal Vigilance is the price of safety as well as of liberty.

Men and Women of Russia! Fight with us for your country! When we break the back of the Jewish International Power, victory will come fast.

I give you this Gentile Rally-Cry: "Patriots of the World--UNITE! You have nothing to lose but the Jews!"

1940 ADDENDA

JEWISH VETERANS UNFIT FOR U. S. CITIZENSHIP?

(From Bulletin broadcast of June 20, 1940)

"The U. S. is a Democracy. Anti-Semitism is a political weapon in the hands of those who want to destroy our Democracy. Anti-Semitic agitation is the chief smoke-screen of the subversive anti-democratic Trajan Horse and Fifth Column activities in this country. THEY MUST BE STOPPED!" From "The Jewish Veteran" of May, 1940.

Whereas: "The Government of the U. S. is NOT a Democracy, but A REPUBLIC" —U. S. ARMY CITIZENSHIP 1928 Training Manual.

"The Jewish Veteran," proclaiming itself to be "The Partiotic Voice of American Jewry," publishes, in its May, 1940, issue, a long arricle headed "Fifth Columns in the U.S.," wherein it tries to smear militant patriots, Robert Edward Edmondson and others, with the brand of Fifth Column tractors, adding: "A fellow-American named Robert Edward Edmondson—I suppose he calls himself an American—is very proud of a testimonial signed by the leading anti-Semites of 22 countries. He is probably the most prolific writer of anti-Semitic pamphlets in the U.S."

Who wouldn't be "proud" to have received from the 1937 Congress of 22 Nations the following communication: "We are sending you this letter to show that we admire you for your tenacity and great moral courage in fighting this greatest of all fights against Iew domination of all we hold noble and sacred."

But the explanatory personal reference, while necessary for clarity, is incidental, and the main point of this analysis is to show that the organ of the Jewish War Veterans of the U. S. has publicly confessed that Jews are unfit for the high privilege of American critizenship because their veterans, supposed to be the cream of Jewry, do not even know (?) what form of government they live under in the U. S., since they call The Republic a Democracy—which word was significantly deleted from the Constitution. They repudiate their U. S. Army Citizenship Manual. Are they trying to change our form of government?

Perhaps some light may be cast on his ineptitude by a reading of the Congressional Record, wherein on page 1145 of June 10. James True reports in his June 15, 1940, weekly letter, the following statement is printed:

JEWS AFRAID TO GO TO WAR?

"The Central Conference of American Rabbis reaffirms its conviction that conscientious objection to military service is in accord with the highest interpretations of Judaism, and therefore petitions the Government of the U. S. to grant to Jewish religious conscientious objectors to war the same exemptions from military service as has long been granted to members of the Society of Friends and similar religious organizations."

Maybe the foregoing "conscientiousness" was responsible for the failure of the Jewish War Veterans Organization to sign the Patriotic American Creed issued by the Grand Army of The Republic, Veterans of Foreign Wars, United Spanish Veterans, Disabled Veterans and the American Legion.

Typical of the way Jewish Vererans put Jewism before Americanism the following extracts are submitted from "A message from the Commander to all Jewish War Veterans and Jewish Communities," issued by George Marcus, Commander North Hudson Post No. 76, Jewish War Veterans, circulated on the advent of the Jewish New Year in September, 1936:

"As fellow-Jews, fellow-citizens, fellow-Americans, we must stand united to further the interests of AMERICAN JEWRY. We are constantly alert to defend THINGS JEWISH. We are wholeheartedy devoted to the support of JEWISH IDEALS."

Nothing is said about the support of or loyalty to AMERICAN ideals and institutions, or allegiance to the AMERICAN Flag. Why? Because "The Parriotic Voice of American—IEWRY" speaks and acts for "Jewry FIRST."

IS the Jewish Fifth Column therefore a present deadly menace to peace and safety? Save the Republic!

EDMONDSON HARD TO STOP, WAILS EDITOR MARGOSHES (From Edmondson bulletin of June 15, 1936)

The following editorial by Dr. S. Margoshes, from "The Day." of June

10, 1936, N. Y. Yiddish newspaper, is largely self-explanatory

"For the last three years one Robert E. Edmondson, who styles himself an investment expert, has been flooding the mails with most scurrilous anti-Semitic circulars. THERE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN NO WAY OF STOPPING HIM.

"An effort to get the P. O. authorities to throw his filthy literature out of

mails proved unavailing.

"A bill introduced in the N. Y. Legislature forbidding the dissemination of propaganda calculated to rouse race-hatred and race-feuds, got as far as the

second reading. AND THEN WAS STOPPED.

"When, months ago, some of us appealed to District Attorney Dodge for relief against the torrent of anti-Semitic circulars then inundating the streets of New York, the answer was that HE WAS POWERLESS TO COPE WITH THE SITUATION UNPROVIDED FOR IN THE LAWS.

"Now, Mayor LaGuardia has found a way to deal with Edmondson. He issued a summons charging criminal libel against Robert E. Edmondson. We

can only hope that the courts will support the Mayor's contentions.

ANSWERING THE CALL OF PUBLIC DUTY

• (1) No "anti-Semitic" circular has ever been issued by Robert Edward Edmondson. Answering the Call to Public Duty against Public Evil, his patriotic anti-Jewish publications have been concentrated against Jewish anti-Americanism. The Arab Minority has done no politico-economic usurpation wrong to America, as has Minority Jewish Leadership. They, too, are Semites.
• (3) I am glad to have Jews at last confirm my statements regarding the Post Office "OK" on mail-matter. Department of Justice investigation agents found me merely exercising my rights of free speech and free press, under the Constitution.
• (3) Margoshes now admits that Edmondson patriotic activities STOPPED the so-called New York Assembly racial bill, which would have "gagged" all anti-Jewish free speech and prohibited circulation of the Bible or a U. S. Congressional Directory containing matter unfavorable to Jews.
• IS MARGOSHES CONFESSING THAT JEWRY HAS DELIBERATELY ATTEMPTED TO SABOTAGE THE FREE SPEECH AND FREE PRESS GUARANTEE OF THE U. S. CONSTITUTION?

Margoshes was Chairman of the Resolutions Committee of the National Convention of the Jews, held at Washington, D. C., on June 14, 1936, to prepare for a World Congress of Jewry. At that meeting Rabbi Wise is quoted in the N. Y. Herald Tribune of June 15, 1936, as warning Jews:

"To refrain from saying things THAT TOMORROW WILL BE USED BY THE EDMONDSONS and enemies of the Jews, WHICH MAY BE USED AS MATERIAL FOR A NEW EDITION OF THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION."

Does Rabbi Wise now admit that the material used in the Protocols WAS taken from previous utterances of the Jews?

A GOOD JEW!

A Jew and his Gentile wife recently visited my N. Y. office, and bought crusade literature, donating \$25. She said to my wife, my volunteer executive assistant, "Your husband is doing the only thing that will stop this Jewish

danger. My husband is a Jew, but he and his father are good Americans. I do not know what may happen to us, whether we will be killed by Jewish orders, or by Americans who realize what is being done to them; but my husband will do to die with."

During the New York campaign for The Republic, threats were received by telephone, mail and otherwise. A favorite epithet greeting my wife when she answered the telephone, was "bitch." She was informed by telephone and letter "how Edmondson was to be mutilated," details being given. Jews crowded the LaGuardia courtroom on the day of the first summons, some of them calling aloud for the "drawing and quartering" of the defendant.

NO APOLOGY:

On July 2, 1936, the Edmondson Libel Case was postponed by the prosecution for the fourth time. The defendant then made the following announcement:

"It has been intimated to me that if I would apologize, the LaGuardia criminal libel action against me for crusading against Jewish anti-Americanism might be withdrawn.

"My fight has been for two great principles—Constitutional Free Speech and against Minority Dictatorship.

"An apology is a confession of wrong-doing. I am not conscious of having libeled 'all the persons of the Jewish Religion,' as accused. Retraction would be betrayal of Principle and Country.

"Is it wrong to patriotically speak, expose and publish THE TRUTH from the records of authority and fact about those who seek to overthrow our political system?

"I SHALL MAKE NO APOLOGY FOR STANDING UP FOR AMERICA AGAINST JEWISH COMMUNISM. Contrary reports will be of enemy origin."

"LEAGUE OF NATIONS COMMUNISTIC"

(From Edmondson bulletin of July 3, 1936)

The self-explanatory passages below are from the 1936 May and June issues of London "Saturday Review," founded in 1855, believed to foreshadow the collapse of the League of Nations.

"What is the League of Nations? It is a League designed by the American President Wilson—which the American Nation very wisely refused to join.

"The policy of the League is to denationalize nations and destroy their individuality. It is destructive of the independence of the people, by usurping their sovereignty. THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS IS INTERNATIONAL AND COMMUNISTIC."

B'NAI B'RITH CALL TO ARMS!

(From a July 3, 1936, bulletin by Edmondson)

Under a heading: "B'nai B'rith Sounds a CALL TO ARMS!" this powerful Jewish Secret Order has broadcast a defiant printed program, calling for new Jewish Solidarity—from which the following are significant extracts:

"Only through an organization which seeks to UNIFY FOR MORE EFFECTIVE ACHIEVEMENT OF OUR COMMON JEWISH PURPOSE, can you really hope to serve.

"The B'nai B'rith, the only International Jewish Fraternity in the world,

organized the anti-Defamation League (of Chicago). The work of this League is directed by a governing board represented in all large cities of the U.S.A. A few of its accomplishments are:

"Elimination of the defamation of the Jew in motion pictures.

"Removal of objectional character of the Jew on the stage.

"Discontinuance of libel of the Jews in magazine articles and trade publications.

"Securing cooperation of the Associated Press in eliminating the word

'Iew' in connection with one accused of crime

"Reduction to a minimum of discrimination against Jews by resorts, hotels, private schools, etc.

"Securing discontinuance of 'The Merchant of Venice' in school systems of

250 cities.'

Under another heading. "Our Plan of Action," this is printed:

"As to literature mailed by anti-Jewish organizations in this and foreign countries, WE PROPOSE TO SECURE COOPERATION OF POSTAL AUTHORITIES.

"Continued intensive work by the Defamation League to counteract by all proper methods every attack upon the Jew of such nature as to affect any appreciable part of public opinion.

"Join now. WE COUNT ON YOU!"

Note particularly the implied control of the press and channels of publicity. Observe the boasted accomplishment of special favors for Jews.

Tomorrow is Independance Day, July 4, 1936. Let us regenerate our American Declaration.

B'NAI B'RITH "TELLS" THE PRESS?

The following special privilege-demanding letter from Chairman Sigmund Livingston of the Anti-Defamation League of the Jewish B'nai B'rith World Secret Order, to the Editor of the Chicago Tribune, under date of Chicago, July 16, 1936, printed in that paper's issue of July 22, is self-explanatory:

"The issue of THE TRIBUNE of July 14 contains an article giving recital of the motion entered by Robert Edmondson, indicted in New York for criminal libel. Among the grounds assigned why action of the grand jury was illegal is that the grand jury was composed of a majority of "Mongol Jews" and that it should be composed of native born Aryan Christian Americans. The early edition of THE TRIBUNE carried very large, blackface type headlines as follows: "Editor Charges Indictment by Mongol Jews." The same headline was used, not quite as prominent, in the later editions.

"Edmondson has for some time made a business of issuing and selling circulars containing the most abusive and scurrilous attacks upon individuals as well as the

Jewish body.

"There is no one but could at once detect that the reasons assigned by him for the motion to quash the indictment were merely for the purpose of publicizing scurrilous matter and for the very purpose of having newspapers use this term of 'Mongol Jew' in prominent fashion. Our purpose in directing your attention to this is that greater care be taken in the publicizing of scurrilous matters, even though they might originate under the feigned guise of court procedure.

and) Sidmond Livingston,

"Chairman, the Anti-Defamation League."

The foregoing may be significant as to why most newspapers throughout the West failed to carry the news of the sensational developments in this case, since the Washington James True Service estimates that 60% of the Associated Press headquarters in the New York Metropolitan news-source is Jewish.

Sigmund Livingston evidently tries to suggest that I conspired with LaGuardia to have him start this action against my personal liberty for the sole persecutory purpose of getting the "Mongol-Jew" news into the headlines. However, this absurdity admits that our campaign to force the Jewish Question into the press, HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.

JEW INTIMIDATION

The documentation as below was in an Edmondson Bulletin of July 25, 1936 and "speaks for itself."

Office of Joseph Gladstone (Insurance)

My dear Mr. Wise:

July 23rd, 1936

I fully understand your lawful right to defend any type of client, but I do wish it did not embrace individuals and groups that are referred to by Dorothy Thompson as the Lunatic Fringe. It is distasteful to me to read of your tie up with such characters as Edmondson. Such types of clients do you more harm than good in the long run.

This constant propaganda against law-abiding minorities is extremely repugnant to true Americanism. Why must you shoulder the defense of such un-American professional propagandists?

(signed) JOSEPH GLADSTONE (Jew)

Office of John S. Wise, Jr.

Dear Mr. Gladstone:

July 24, 1936

Thanks for your friendly letter of the 23d inst.

I am not impressed by Dozothy Thompson's ideas.

Nor am I alarmed about the effect on my professional standing by representing Edmondson.

Of course our local judiciary is largely Jewish, but I don't believe that will embarrass me. I estimate that our Jewish population in their segregated methods of living amongst us, use Jewish lawyers in 90% of their legal affairs.

I shall not avoid an employment that helps bring out THE WHOLE TRUTH.

(signed) JOHN S. WISE, JR.

UNBELIEVABLE JEWISH ARROGANCE

For Gentile enlightenment, I submit below a graphic parallel review of the 1924 book entitled, "You Gentiles," by Maurice Samuel, Zionist Leader.

WHAT THE AUTHOR SAYS

Between Gentiles and Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf. Ours is one life—yours another. This primal difference is not reconciliable, It is sbysmal.

Wherever the Jew is found, he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and those around him. Jews are everywhere, to a large extent, ALIENS—unquestionably an alien spirit in your colleges. He will not accept your rules of right or wrong because he does not understand them. These two ways of life are utterly ALIEN TO THE OTHER. They are ENEMIES.

Our Jewishness is not a creed; it is our totality. A Jew is a Jew in everything. We cannot conceive of a duality—religion and life, the sacred and the secular. I might say, "We and God grew up together." In the heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Jews alone understand the universality of God.

There does not seem to be a single country with a history which has not been ANTI-SEMITIC at one time or another.

You might say, "Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other." But the two are not merely different; THEY ARE OPPOSED IN MORTAL ENMITY. REVIEW COMMENT

If that is so, why not promptly divorce this alien element from America, since is admits its inability to Americanize?

Why, then, butt in where he is unwanted? Clinging to his own Code, the Jew insists that Gentiles also adopt it. Why should Americans submit to such outrageous tyranny in their own country?

Towering arrogance! The chosen complex! Superiority obsession! "Me and God" What Blasphemy!

WHY? Who is to blame? Two billion Gentiles are all wrong! Sixteen million Jews are always right! What a Philosophy!

Our tolerance, then, means nothing to the Jew, except to use it to his own selfish ends, In your world a man should be loyal to his country, to his province, to his city. To the Jew, naked loyalty is an incomprehensible thing.

Jews are the most CLANNISH of peoples. The fact that they have persisted for 80 generations in maintaining a racial and spiritual identity bespeaks essential discipline of amazing vigor and power. The discipline of our Jewishness is subjection of the individual to the mass.

We Jews pay little attention to the afterlife. We thank God FOR HAVING MADE US DIFFERENT FROM YOU.

The instinct of the Gentile is to distrust the Jew, of the Jew to distrust the Gentile. Set side by side with us, you are bullies, cowards and mobs.

We are not in your midst by our own will, but through YOUR action. We are unwelcome to you because we are what we are. We have more cogent reasons for hating you (than you for hating us).

Liberal Jews, Radical Jews, Modernized Jews, Agnostic Jews, ARE BECOMING THE DOMINANT ELEMENT IN JEW-RY. We have produced an overwhelming number of revolutionaries—banner bearers of the world's armies of "liberation."

Repudiation of the Jewish Religion DOES NOT ALTER THE JEW.

You must learn to dislike and fear the modern and "unassimilated" Jew more than you did the old Jew. He is more dangerous to you. His enmity to your way of life was tacit before. Today it is active.

We Jews are accused of being destroyers. We are a homeless mass seeking satisfaction. We cannot find it. WE ARE DESTROYERS—EVEN IN THE INSTRUMENTS OF DESTRUCTION TO WHICH WE TURN FOR RELIEF. Jews will remain destroyers FOREVER. NOTHING that you will do will meet our demands.

There are hardly any Jews among the world's wealthiest men. The greatest financial institutions are almost exclusively non-Jewish.

One thing is quite certain: A Jew is never baptized for the purpose of becoming a Christian. He aims to become a Gentile. lews put Jewry first.

Which contradicts his statement that the Jews don't know what loyalty is. They do when Jewry's interests are concerned. Isn't the maintenance of mass discipline manifest evidence of regimentation like that of Communism?

"The Pharisee prayed: 'God, I thank Thee that I am not as THE REST OF MEN' "—Luke 18:10. The same Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow!

Where there is mutual distrust, harmony cannot live. So why waste time with Jewish "good neighbor" ballyhoo—designed to deceive Gentiles?

Americans did not invite the Jewish invasion. They would welcome an exodus.

Another confession defi. Boasts and pride.

Then, a Jew "converted" to Christianity remains Jewish in his real attitude toward it!

This is a threat and a warning Gentiles will do well to heed before it is too late—noting the gains made by Jewish Communism. What COLOSSAL INGRATITUDE!

Forcing themselves into the midst of their "common enemy," they foolishly tell him of the destruction Jews work. "Bereft of Vision, the people perish!" WHY SHOULD AMERICA NURSE SUCH A VIPER? If we are destroyed, can we say we were not warned?

What about Rothschilds, Warburgs, Sassoon, Samuels et al? Author Sombart says in "Jews & Modern Capitalism:" "The Jews made an Art of lending money. They became LORDS of Money—and LORDS OF THE WORLD."

Does the Jew use the screen of religion to promote his own material interests?

You may ask: What difference is there between a Jew claiming to be an American and an Italian claiming to be one? Is it more HUMILIATING for one than the other? The cleft between you, Americans and Italians, Frenchmen and Germans, is but a wide jump compared with the CHASM BETWEEN US AND ANY ONE OF YOU. We cannot assimilate.

After all this, why not disfranchise Jews. Under their Constitution, states may do so. Americanism is an organism which cannot tolerate an alien or foreign element—and must in self-preservation cast it out as poison to the body politic. Most of us consider it a privilege and an honor to be an American.

JEWISH QUESTION ECONOMIC NOT RACIAL NOR RELIGIOUS

From Oct. 3, 1936 Bulletin by Edmondson

"We have consistently refused to attack Jews AS INDIVIDUALS. We do not attack the Jews on racial or religious ground. We believe in Justice for Jew and Gentile.

"WE ATTACK JEWS ON ECONOMIC GROUNDS."

The foregoing is from the Sept. 5, 1936, issue of "The Black Shirt" of London.

In his maiden speech on the Jewish Problem in the early part of 1934, the undersigned, emphasizing the primary economic nature of this menace, answered the question, "What is the remedy?" by proposing, "an ECONOMIC Boycott of all Jewish Production."

In "The Riddle of the Jews' Success," by Stoltheim, this confirming statement is made:

"The enormous liberation of energy caused by the Speculative Principle of the Jew, and the enormous development of external life caused thereby, deceive as to the true state of affairs. The glitter and gleam appear to many as the veritable light of life; but it is, in reality, ONLY THE PHOSPHOR-ESCENCE OF CORRUPTION. The last reserves of national energy are forced into action—WHICH MUST END IN EXHAUSTION.

"Jewish understanding does not look beyond today and tomorrow, and operates destructively and suicidally in all directions. The Jewish mode of thinking is inorganic, and is, for that reason, incapable of creative action. The Jew is unable to conceive that the world dominion for which he is striving would mean SIMULTANEOUS WORLD RUIN."

It will not be contested that the illegal "NRA," patterned after the Israel Moses Sieff "Politico-ECONOMIC Planning" set up in England, was essentially economic. Boston Jewish Merchant Edward A. Filene was the "financial angel" of this monopoly.

Here are economic confessions from Jewish sources:

"The Jewish Question is not so much anti-Semitic today as it is AN ECONOMIC QUESTION." That sentence is from the London Jewish Chronicle of June 26, 1936, quoting President N. J. Laski of the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

"The economic boycott being practiced against the Jews is even more deadly than the sporadic acts of violence thus far committed in Central and Eastern Europe," says H. J. Seligman, Director of Public Relations of the American Joint Distribution Committee, on returning from abroad, according to an article in the N. Y. Times Sept. 28, 1936.

The Arabian Nationalist Leader Husseini accurately sums up the economic factor in the N. Y. Times of June 21, 1936, thus: "European newspapers

mention 'anti-Semitism' in Palestine. This is nonsense. We ourselves belong to the Semite Race. We turn against the Jews, not because they are Jews, but because THEY THREATEN OUR EXISTENCE."

A GENTILE-JEW CONFERENCE

The following is from Edmondson bulletin of Oct. 10, 1936:

A prominent Chicago Jewish "capitalist" lawyer author asked the editor for an off-the-record conference this week. Having read and reviewed his book, apparently an effort to arrive at a fair understanding between Non-Jew and Jew, the meeting was welcomed. Following is the enlightening record made in shorthand at the conclusion thereof:

'In your opinion," asked the editor, "how many Jews are Communistic?"

"Among my acquaintances of a thousand, not more than 75; and that is

representative.

"But one of the most prominent of New York Jews admitted to me personally that approximately 85% of Jews were Communistic; and James Waterman Wise says 'the Jewish masses' are Communistic, challenging the American Jewish Committee to disprove it."

"They don't know what they are talking about," declared the lawyerauthor. "My family and I and many other Jews refuse to accept the so-called Jewish leadership of Rabbi Wise, Samuel Untermyer, Justice Brandeis, Chaim Weissman, the Washungs, et al."

REPUDIATE FALSE LEADERSHIP!

"Then," argued the editor, "why don't the said Jewish masses publicly repudiate such false leadership? Get rid of it!"

"We can't get rid of it. How can we?"

"That's up to you Jews. Necessity finds a way. When an individual refuses self-discipline and disobeys laws, the world itself drastically disciplines him. If minority Jewry doesn't 'clean house' and discipline its leadership, a world majority that believes itself to be grievously injured by the Jewish System is going to do it without regard to Jewish feelings."

Then you propose, for example, to deport my children—who do not

approve the Jewish Leadership?"

"Why not, if they by silence condone Jewish anti-Americanism and will not stand up and be counted for Country First. I am not fighting Jews as individuals. I am fighting the leadership of the Judaic Economic System, which ruthlessly victimizes both non-Jew and Jew individuals."

"There is now no such thing as Judaism."

"There is, however, Jewishness, which you condemned in your book, and on contacting which Gentiles become anti-Jewish."

"But the men indicated are not representative of Jewish leaders," the

lawver insisted.

"Being prominently vocal, constantly declaring that they stand for Jewish rights, and actively working therefor without public challenge or contradiction, the Gentile world naturally accepts them as representative leadership. How can you expect non-Jews to understand the views of a silent contingent?"

"What do you say these leaders are trying to do?"

"THE JEWISH COMMON PURPOSE"

"Overwhelming circumstantial evidence shows that they are attempting to impose Jewish political domination on every large country in the world through predatory economic monetary weapons."

Without attempting refutation, the Chicago lawyer-author contented him-

self with: "You are all wrong."

"That's what most of the Jews say," retorted the editor, recalling the "chosen" superiority complex. "But, as a lawyer, you will admit that a 'general denial' without rebuttal proof exposes a fundamentally weak case. Opinions will not settle this matter. The American public is going to judge from the facts and the unrefuted evidence of the record."

"But you are not going about the solution of the problem in the right way. Now, when I go into court and present my conclusions to the judge, he tells me that he must have supported precedents, which I give him; and he decides the case on those authorities and relative merits."

CITING THE RECORD OF EVIDENCE

"That is precisely what I have been doing—citing the record, quoting authority after authority—mostly Jewish—in support of allegations of Jewish anti-Americanism. Take the report of the conference of American Rabbis, recently held. They declared against the present American System and advocated 'A Thoroughly Socialized Democracy in its place."

"Yes, but many American non-Jew statesmen have argued for exactly the same thing, such as Norman Thomas, Clarence Darrow, John Haynes Holmes, and men of that caliber."

"Those men are not representative American statesmen, THEY ARE SOCIALISTS. All socialists are antagonistic to Americanism. And 'the thoroughly socialized democracy' of the rabbis is essentially Communistic."

"All these prominent Jews mentioned are acting for profit, not leadership. They speak publicly for profit; they write for profit. I wrote my book on the Jewish Question for profit." Thus said the author.

"YOU THEREBY CONCLUSIVELY PROVE MY THESIS THAT THE JEWISH QUESTION IS NEITHER RACIAL NOR RELIGIOUS, BUT ECONOMIC."

ADDENDA

DREISER SPEAKS OUT

Theodore Dreiser, the writer, wrote to Hutchins Hapgood in "The Nation" of April 17, 1935: "Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means INTER-NATIONALISM. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are money minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which at least is endorsed, and to a degree, followed by lawyers of other nationalities. The Jew has been in Germany for all of a thousand years, and he is still a Jew. He has been in America all of 200 years, and he has not faded into a pure American by any means—and he will not."

A "GOOD" JEW GONE "WRONG"

The flip-flop described below in an Oct. 19, 1936, bulletin is typical of the communist policy of changing positions to meet new circumstances:

"I join with you in condemning any Jew or Gentile who fosters ideas or theories or practices subversive to the traditional American order."—James P. Warburg wrote Robert Edward Edmondson Dec. 4, 1934.

Roosevelt is the man about whom Warburg said in his 1935 book, "Hell Bent for Election:"

"He has FLOUTED the Constitution, which he swore on oath to protect;

he is no more likely to change his basic characteristics than is a leopard to change his spots, and the sooner we have done with him, the better for the country."

"I shall cast my vote for the re-election of President Roosevelt in November."—James P. Warburg wrote Secretary of State Hull, Oct. 13, 1936.

Has Repudiator Warburg turned "Red?" Or is he obeying the Communal "Call of the Blood" to "Save Jewry!"

"I am a Loyal Jew,' Warburg reminded me in 1934 when we first sat down in conference to discuss "Americanism."

Jewry FIRST-Americanism LAST?

James P. Warburg's reason for his somersault is phrased thus: "It is impossible for me to support an opposition (to Roosevelt) which either will not or cannot recognize that Economic NATIONALISM lies at the root of our great difficulties."

NATIONALISM! The secret is out. Nationalism is Patriotic—Fascistic, when militant. Jewry is AGAINST FASCISM and FOR "A Thoroughly SOCIALIZED Democracy"—according to the American Rabbi Conference. THAT is COMMUNISTIC! Jewish Communal Ideals are notoriously INTERNATIONAL—and anti-national.

So James P. Warburg is now apparently against "The Traditional American Order." which is NOT Internationalism:

"ANTI-SEMITIC" CAUSES OF TODAY

(The address herein reproduced in part was delivered upon the unsolicited invitation of the representaives of the famous Cardinal Newman Club of New York in their church auditorium at 529 W. 121st St., N. Y. City, Feb. 7, 1937, before more than 500 Catholic Youth, by Robert Edward Edmondson.)

The subject listed for this address is "Anti-Semitic" Causes of Today. Quotation marks enclose the word "Anti-Semitic" because it is a misleading term.

It is of primary importance to know exactly what we are to talk about before analyzing a subject. Therefore, let us examine the designation "Anti-Semitic."

The number of Atabs, Syrians and Egyptians who are also Semites practically equals the Jewish world population total as supplied by Jewish authorities.

Therefore, to be "Anti-Semitic" you must be against ALL members of the so-called Semite Race—which is an absurdity, since most Occidental peoples contact only the Jewish Semites.

Husseini, Arab Nationalist Party Leader, aptly sums up the crisis in the N. Y. Times of June 21, 1936, saying: "European newspapers mention 'Anti-Semitism' in Palestine. This is nonsense, as we ourselves are Semites. We turn against the Jews not because they are Jews, but because they threaten our existence."

In presenting this matter to you I wish to make my own position crystal clear. I sincerely believe in the truth of the information offered. It is submitted and analyzed with the justifiable motive of concern for the public welfare. While the heart of the trouble is economic, in my opinion, the important fields of politics, publicity, religion and tace have been invaded in varying extent.

I do not belong to any church; but I am a believer in practical postive Christian principles. I am not a member of any secret society. My business is that of an independent economist, editor and publisher. I am likewise independent in politics, being merely a patriot who stands for traditional Americanism.

I have never been against Jews as individuals, as to race or religion. Under the Constitution of the U. S., I am for intelligent racial and religious tolerance forever. But I am unalterably against that power-lusting false leadership which is promoting a predatory economic system that is destroying Jew as well as Gentile.

Where there is an effect, there must be a cause. There must be an offensive Jewism before there can be a defensive reaction of Anti-Jewism. Let us diagnose from symptom back to origin.

SOMETHING WRONG

In this connection I quote from the N. Y. Times of Jan. 30, 1937, part of a suggestive display advertisement published by the Polish Newspaper Guild of America, protesting against American Jewry's attack on Poland. It said: "There must be SOME-THING wrong somewhere if millions and millions of Germans, Arabs, Hungarians, Rumanians, French, English, Italians, Poles, Russians and Americans NURSE ANTI-PATHY TOWARD THE JEWS."

In "The Truth About The Jews", published in 1922 by Walter Hurt, the most pro-Jewish Gentile writer I have contacted, the following economic admission is made: "Racial prejudice rises only when different races come into direct economic conflict. His (the Jew's) economic ethics are not those of the Gentile. The Jew being an Oriental, his mental processes are unlike those of the Occidental. He exists in a mental ghetto. Even as the characters of the Hebrew language read backward, so do Jews think reversely. Modern Finance is chiefly the creation of the Jews. They found that the sceptre of power was fashioned of gold. Possession of much of this metal made an enslaved people masters of their masters."

Pro-Jewish Prof. Werner Sombart in his 1913 "Jews and Modern Capitalism," makes this supporting economic analysis: "Capitalism was born from the money loan. The Jews made an art of lending money. They were raught early to look for their chief happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords of Money—and Lords of the World."

The British Guardian of July August, 1924, reports Karl Marx, "Jewish Father of Communism," as having said: "What is the basis of Judaism? A practical passion and greed for profit. To what can we reduce his (the Jew's) religious worship? To extortion. What is his real god? CASH!"

THE RECORD OF THE SOVIET

Let us examine the record of the Soviet, where anti-Semitism is punished by death. This confession is from the American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920:

"The Bolshevist revolution was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking and discontent. What Jewish Idealism and discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind and heart are tending to promote in other countries."

The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919, says: "The ideals of Bolshevism are many points consonant with the finest Ideals of Judaism."

The 1919 Overman Report to Congress, quoting Rev. Dr. George Albert Simons of the U. S., formerly resident in St. Petersburg: "In the Northern Community of St. Petersburg out of 388 members only 16 happened to be Russians. All the rest were Jews. 265 came from the lower East Side of New York."

From the Dec. 29, 1934, American Patriotic Coalition Statement to a Congressional Committee: "The Communist movement in the U. S. is an alien conspiracy; it is treason. The brains and moving spirit are in Russia."

The preface to the 1920 "World Significance of the Russian Revolution" was written by London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy. He admits: "Jewish elements supply the driving force for both Communism and Capitalism."

From "The Jewish State," by Theodor Herzl, Zionist Leader, we read: "When we Jews sink we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic); when we rise there also arises our terrible power of the purse" (Capitalistic).

CAPITALISM FINANCES COMMUNISM

From "The Truth about the Slump" (1932) by A. N. Field: "The enormously significant thing today is that the Jewish 'power of the purse' and revolutionary activity are working in a common direction; and there is a mass of evidence that they are working in unison." Is Jewish Communism the tool used by Jewish Capitalism to subvert Gentiles? I believe it is.

From the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933: "The Roosevelt Administration has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration;" referring to Bernard M. Baruch as "Unofficial President;" to Felix Frankfurter as "one of the President's most trusted advisors;" and to New York Judge Rosenman as "Roosevelt's Right Arm."

From the N. Y. Times, Jewish-owned, of June 28, 1934: "The underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy of Justice Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court. The NRA (later declared unconstitutional) is almost a composite of his dissenting opinions."

From the N. Y. Jewish National Day of April 9, 1936: "The Jews of America constitute a great political force. They are going to exercise it as they see fit. What are you going to do about it?"

The London Jewish Chronicle of February 7, 1936, published a letter on the world war by former Jewish Propaganda Agent S. Landman of the British Government, reading in part; "The only way to induce the American President to come into the world war (of 1914-17) was to secure the cooperation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine. Zionists carried out their part and helped to bring America into the war."

From the January, 1928, issue of the "Century Magazine" is this by Jewish Writer Marcus Eli Ravage: "We Jews have taken your natural world, your ideas, yout destiny and played havor with them. We are at the bottom, not merely of the latest great war, but of nearly all of your wars. We did it solely with the irresistable might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda."

"Secret Societies," a book by Nesta H. Webster of England, contains this: "The hope of world domination is not an idea attributed to the Jews by anti-Semites, but is a very real and essential part of their traditions."

Jewish Prof. Edwin R. A. Seligman of New York, is authority in a letter of Jan 29, 1927, 10 the N. Y. Post, for the statement that the late Paul M. Warburg, German born Jewish banker, was the father of the U. S. Federal Reserve System.

AMERICAN SYSTEM CHALLENGED

The Central Conference of America Rabbis—the largest organization of the kind in the world—issued the following defi to the American System, as printed in the N. Y. Times of Sept. 13, 1936: "We challenge the present social system. We advocate a socialization of basis enterprises. There is only one way in which the American people can escape Fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing "A THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY."

The American System was not intended to be and is not a democracy. It is a a Federated Union of sovereign states whose Washington nationalistic powers were strictly limited and sub-divided into three grand balanced divisions as a bulwark against dictatorship and communistic invasion.

B. A. M. Schapiro, a New Yorker who terms himself "a Christian by Faith, a Jew by Race," in his booklet "America's Great Menace," says therein: "The time has come when patriotic Jews of America should feel the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) hatched and planned in the camp of Isreal."

Waterman Wise, wrote in the "New Masses" magazine of Oct. 29, 1935: "Jews who deny that many Jews are Communists are jockeying themselves into the position of citizens on toleration." He implies that the Jewish masses are Communistic.

This confession appears in "You Gentiles," a 1924 book by Zionist Leader Maurice Samuels: "We Jews are destroyers—even in the instruments of destruction to which we turn for relief. Jews will remain destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet turn demands."

The "Christian Century" of Chicago in its April 29th and May 19th, 1936, issues, contains this indictment: "Most non-Jewish Americans know little of the aspirations of the Jews. When they learn, their complacency in present ignorance is likely to be greatly disturbed. Jewty is a mutual benefit organization. It is also a propagandist organization. American society is an organism, and as such its vital forces tend toward solidarity, unity, integration. A non-assimilable element of the population is bound to have trouble because it is bound to MAKE trouble."

PUBLICITY CHANNELS SUBVERTED

In the United States the "great power of the press" is very extensively controlled by advertisers, money-lenders and writers who are Jewish or under such influence. The first line of defense of the Republic, free exchange of vital politico-economic information, is therefore treasonably suppressed.

Note this confirming-confession from the 1933 book "From Pharaoh to Hitler," by Chicago Jewish-Lawyer Author Bernard J. Brown: "Jews have muzzled the non-Jew press to the extent that American newspapers abstain from saying that any person unfavorably referred to is a Jew."

The Jewish National Anti-Defamation League of Chicago, on Dec. 13, 1933, issued the following: "Scribner & Sons have just published a book by Madison Grant entitled "The Conquest of a Continent." The author insists that American development depends upon the elimination of unassimilable alien masses. We are interested in stifling the sale of this book."

A research into modern religious fields in connection with the subject of this address uncovered the following from the London Jewish World of March 15, 1923: "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian."

From the N. Y. Jewish National Day of Dec. 14, 1935: "The public schools must be kept clear of Christmas carols and other Christmas influences. We want all this

Christmas propaganda stopped.

The January 10. 1937, issue of the Jewish N. Y. Morning Freiheit, printed this attack: "According to the Jewish Religion, the Pope is the enemy of the Jewish people by the very fact that he is the head of the Catholic Church. The Jewish Religion is

apposed to Christianity, and to the Catholic Church in particular,"

You may wonder how a minority can control the economic life of the majority. But one man with command over a million dollars can dominate 100 others dependent for their existence upon his resources. The number of Jews do not count. Money control does. It works behind Gentile Fronts. One subversive key-post Jew, backed by the practically unlimited wealth of Jewish Solidarity, can easily dominate his associates. And the power of gold enables Jews to crowd Gentiles out of and monopolize the avenues of opportunity.

The 40% Jewish proportion of the population of Greater New York represents the largest centralization of Jews in the world. New York is the Power Center of the U. S. Washington is the Political Power Center of the U. S. More Jews admittedly hold

key positions in the present national regime than in any other.

All this is not "by accident." False leadership is responsible, in my opinion. All Jews are not guilty, but all Jews are "under control." Many have told me they did not like that leadership. They said they could not get rid of it. I pointed out that the world, which disciplines a man who refuses to discipline himself, would probably do it drastically, in self-defense.

The quotations I have listed in the address are taken mostly from Jewish records. While the surface has barely been scratched, I believe they furnish significant evidence

as to the " 'Anti-Semitic' Causes Of Today.'

DIVERSION STRATEGY

The following question was asked by a priest-member of the audience:

"Since Mr. Edmondson has attacked Jews on economic grounds, why have they

attacked him in court on RELIGIOUS grounds?"

The answer is that the camouflage strategy of Jewish leadership is to divert attention from the heart of the matter, which they cannot answer, and in reply merely enter a

general denial-considered in law to reflect a weak case.

And, having been attacked in court on religious grounds, there was no alternative for the defendant but to extend his investigations beyond the politico-economic field into that of the so-called Jewish Religion—which he began immediately after indictment in 1936, proceeding to assemble his findings in exhibit form for submission to court in rebuttal—as well as to broadcast them in line with his masthead declaration: "Pitiless Publicity is the Cure for Public Evils."

A DOUBLE-FRONT POLICY

Evidence of a control policy is found in the 1936-7 Jewish Year Book, just out, where, on Pages 224-5 the following statement is made after reference to the LaGuardia court action against Robert Edward Edmondson for "libeling

all persons of the Tewish Religion":

** * reached the conclusion that recourse to law and efforts to secure additional legislation were seldom advisable. The report pointed out the possibility of evoking UNDESIRABLE publicity; the difficulty of bringing an action which will not MAKE A MARTYR of the defendant; and the PARAMOUNT NECESSITY of refusing to take any action that would VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OF THE PRESS AND OF ASSEMBLY. It may be the part of wisdom to adopt principally a long-range program of education."

DEMURRER FILED

A demurrer was filed on March 16, 1937, in the Edmondson Case, with supporting brief containing the following, accompanied by documents quoted beginning:

"The N. Y. Statute defining libel does not make it a crime to publish defamatory matter concerning a race, religion or class (group) of people.

"Clearly, all the bulletins listed are treatment of subjects of governmental administration and public interest, which defendant published with good motives and for justifiable ends in honest belief of their truth."

An appendix in support of the Demurrer includes the following:

The following is from Exhibit 38: "The Patriotic Crusade" defining aims, policies and objectives, of the indictment "bill of particulars:" "I stand for American religious and racial freedom under the Constitution forever; but I am unalterably against Jewish Minority Politico-Economic Monopoly over the American Majority." Is there any religious libel in that?

The following is from the Jewish Magazine "Reflex" of November, 1927:

"The modern rabbi is a man of the world. He is valued most as the executive manager of the wealthy congregation. He knows and cherishes the power of money, and is an adept in matters of finance, mortgages and loans."

From the August, 1927, issue of the same magazine: "Rabbi means master, intellectual master. Neither by law nor tradition is he a priest or a healer. He has no religious function whatever."

On Page 368 of "Anti-Semitism: Its History and Causes," the Jewish author, Bernard Lazare, declares: "Nor is it only Talmudism that is dying; but the Jewish Religion itself is in its death agony."

"Judaism has been described by Moses Mendelsohn, learned Jew, in this way: 'Judaism is not a religion but a law religionized.' Judaism is not a religion. It is a sect with Judaism as a rite."—Taken from "Occult Theocracy" by Lady Queenborough,

The "Holyday Prayers," a "New Ritual for New Year and Day of Atonement," eleventh edition, Bloch Publishing Co., "The Jewish Book Concern," New York, published in 1936, contains the following Kol Nidre under the heading "Evening Service for Atonement":

"All vows and self-prohibitions, oaths, vows of abstinence and promise, vows with self-imposed penalties and obligations, which we may vow, swear, promise and bind ourselves from this day of Atonement until the next day of Atonement—may it come to us in happiness—we repent them all. May they be absolved, cancelled and made null and void, without power or binding-force. May such vows, self-prohibitions and oaths be considered as non-existent."

Commenting upon Kol Nidre, the Jewish Encyclopedia, Page 541, makes the following statement: "It cannot be denied that, according to the unusual wording of the formula, an unscrupulous man might think that it offers a means of escape from the obligations and promises which he had assumed and made in regard to others... Many judges refused to allow them (Jews) to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections chiefly on this prayer."

Defendant, a non-churchman, noted that The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919, said that: "The ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the Finest Ideals of Judaism"; that the London Jewish World of March 15, 1923, declared: "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian."

Describing the emancipation of the Jews, Jewish Author Bernard Lazare in his book "Anti-Semitism, Its History," makes the following statement: "The Jews made the only conquest for which they were armed—that economic conquest for which they had been preparing themselves so many years. By holding gold, they became masters of their masters. They dominated them."

JEWISH POWER B. C.

The following is quoted from "Anti-Semitism Yesterday and Tomorrow," a 1936 book by Rabbi Lee Levinger, Chapter 1: "In the year 59 before the Christian era, Marcus Tullius Cicero, the leading orator and lawyer of his day, was defending a certain Lucious Valerius Flaccus against the charge of embezzling various funds, including some which had been collected by Jews to send to their temple in Jerusalem. In that famous speech Cicero remarked: 'Next comes the malicious accusation about the gold of the Jews. It is this count in the indictment, Laelius, that has made you pick out this place; and that is responsible for the crowd around us. You know very well how numerous that class is, with what unanimity they act, and what strength they exhibit in political meetings. But

I shall frustrate their purpose. I shall speak in a low tone, just loud enough for the jury to hear. There is no lack of men, as you very well know, to stir up these fellows against me and every patriotic citizen; and I have no intention of making the task of such mischief-makers lighter by any act of mine."

At the 1934 N. Y. State election for Governor, Lehman was Democratic candidate, Moses Republican nominee, Solomon the Socialist and Amter the Communist, all Jews.

The front page of the 8th edition of the afternoon Chicago American of April 6, 1936, had a seven-column head: "Secret Meeting against Horner" (Solomon Levy), Governor of Illinois, over an article quoting Mayor Kelly in a Jew-warning speech under the auspices of "The Democratic League of Chicago," with a political address by Jewish President-Alderman Jacob M. Arvey, during which the latter is quoted as saying: "I resent the fact that this (racial) propaganda has been started. I am a Jew first and then a Democrat!"

A JEWISH SUPRESSION

Following are Excerpts from "The Mystical Body of Christ in The Modern World," by Rev. Dennis Fahey, Blackrock College, Dublin. This 1935 book carries the Imprimatur of the Catholic Church:

"In April, 1919, there was published by the command of His Majesty, and by His Majesty's Stationery Office, a White Paper entitled 'Russia,' No. 1 (1919). A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, as below:

"'Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world. It is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things . . . I would beg that this report be telegraphed as soon as possible in cypher in full to the British Office in view of its importance."

"Why did this official White Paper . . . disappear from circulation and become unobtainable? And why was there published in its place an abridged edition, in which this particular passage was eliminated?

"It is obviously and logically clear that there is only one race on earth that has any interest in the suppression of this official document, and that race is the Jewish race."

"Asia," the magazine, on Page 223 of the February-March issue of 1920, printed this: "In all Bolshevist institutions the heads are Jews. They are contemptuous of everyone, which excites the people against them. They look upon Bolshevism as Jewish. Anti-Semitism is widespread in the Red Army. There is a great national religious fervor among the Jews. They believe that the promised time of the rule of 'God's elect' on earth is come."

"Al" Smith's "New Outlook" magazine of February, 1934, contained the following under the signature of James E. Abbe, author of "I Photograph Russia:" "The men who control Russia are not Russians. Members of the Jewish race from all over the world, predominate."

LA GUARDIA'S BLOW TO FREE PRESS

The following letter, dated Aug. 27. 1936, signed by Louis Waldman, Jewish Attorney, addressed to the New York Herald Tribune, was printed on the editorial page of that paper August 29:

"May I congratulate you upon your sane and sound editorial in today's Tribune (Aug. 27, 1936), entitled 'Anti-Semitism as Criminal Libel'?

"For the disseminators of anti-Semitic propaganda I have nothing but loathing but the remedy sought to be invoked by Mayor LaGuardia is socially dangerous and legally unsound.

"If the law, under which the disseminator (the defendant) of anti-Semitic propaganda in New York is sought to be held, is sustained, then freedom of expression and criticism will have received a fatal blow from most unexpected sources."

In his letter of June 8, 1936, demanding action against defendant Edmondson, Mayor LaGuardia said in part: "It is repulsive to all thinking persons that religious prejudice and racial harreds exist in this country. This type of agitation may incite a breach of peace and public disorder. You will find startlingly similar motives established in the case of Rex vs. Osborne in London, 1932. The law laid down in that case is the law today in this country. The remedy is by invoking the law of criminal libel if the statements are not truthful and the motive unlawful."

Defendant challenges Mayor LaGuardia to produce AUTHENTIC evidence that his publications caused a single breach of the peace or violence either before or after the indictment of nine months ago.

WAR CENTERS ON U.S.

From Edmondson bulletin of Apr. 27, 1937:

Following is the substance of an address delivered recently by Robert Edward Edmondson before a private and informal group of New York men and women:

Communism—also known as Internationalism, Marxism, Socialism and Bolshevism—has mysteriously and steadily gained in America during the past twenty years despite growing anti-Communist activity, until we are now immediately confronted with the nationalization of our youth, undermining of our individual property right, destruction of our great Constitution through proposed sabotage of the Supreme Court Guardianship.

If the SHOCKING FACTS are not soon received by citizens with open minds, Americans and their Government of, by and for We, The People, ARE LOST.

A pall of FALSE FEAR seems to paralyze the defense-initiative of higher intelligence, culture and wealth. That fear would evaporate like sun-pierced fog if the news censorship now blinding National Patriotism is thrown off.

I'm not an alarmist, I'm just a hard-boiled veteran newspaperman who stands with Lincoln—"Let the People Know the Truth, the WHOLE Truth—and the Country will be SAFE." Otherwise, if the great sound middle-class of America is not awakened and informed, I dread to contemplate the future.

Since discovering the Cause of Communism in April, 1934, I have been conducting a patriotic DEFENSIVE campaign against the False Leadership of the International Jewish Economic System, announcing that I was not against Jews as individuals or as to their race or religion—Yet I am now DEFENDING in the courts, an indictment brought against me by a New York Grand Jury the majority of which were Jews, who alleged that I had libeled the Jewish Religion, whereas the Jewish ECONOMIC System only was exposed.

The explanation lies in the fact that the economic accusation is unanswerable, and the screen of religion is invoked as a camouflage diversion.

My own resources have been exhausted by this patriotic drain; but I have been instrumental, through the magnificent co-operation and sacrifice of patriotic groups throughout the country, in exposing this plot in detail to over 10 million people. In this connection, I would like to say that 90% of my general support has come from outside the big cities.

In the final analysis this is not my fight, but that of the whole nation.

Imperative in this great crisis is the support of Americans who believe in our form of Government, in our Constitution, in our Liberty—patriots who are against allowing Socialists, Communists and Jewish Internationalists, through political corruption, to invade our country and prostitute its great system to their own ends.

There ought to be financial millions ready for such a grand service. There should have been millions behind this crusade before now. The preservation of American Institutions is worth ANY sacrifice. In this country true Individual Liberty was born. Here British Subjects and Black Slaves became FREE CITIZENS.

Americans are long suffering, over-tolerant, self-sacrificing; but the time has come when there will be a trial of the question as to whether or not they

are WORTHY of and FIT for the unprecedented individual liberty the United States Constitution confers upon them. We may have to pass through the Valley of the Shadow—like Russia, Germany, Hungary, Spain.

The False Leadership of International Jewry covets this Promised Land of ours more than any other.

The struggle converges on our country, which has been seized through secret controls of the Press, Politics and Economics.

America is now in "FULL CRISIS"! And I cannot impress it upon you too earnestly—"IT IS LATER THAN YOU THINK!"

LA GUARDIA GIVEN A JEW MEDAL

The following was printed under date of May 3, 1937:

"The American Hebrew," at a Waldorf-Astoria Hotel banquet on May 2, 1937, presided over by International Jewish Banker Henry Morgenthau, Sr., hung a medal on New York half-Jew Mayor LaGuardia, in consideration of—

Having had Robert Edward Edmondson, native American of the Scotch Minority, indicted for alleged libel of a non-existent "Jewish Religion"; and whose patriotic exposures of Jewish-Communist Conspiracies are preposterously denounced in the formal medal presentation as "rabid anti-Semitic incitations of one Robert Edward Edmondson, LONG SUSPECTED AS AN ALLY OF SUBVERSIVE UN-AMERICAN FORCES," resulting in the "indictment of Edmondson on a charge of criminal libel for traducing the Jewish Community"; this last phrase being a deliberate lie, for the charge reads "libeling all persons of the Jewish Religion."

(As the aforesaid indictment has not even been acted upon by a trial-court—the District Attorney having failed to set trial since it was brought over ten months ago—the farcical character of the presentation is obvious.)

"Mayor LaGuardia's selection (for the medal) was based on his devotion . . . to A FAIR DEAL FOR ALL New Yorkers irrespective of race or creed," unctuously announced the "great" International Banker Morgenthau.

Americans did not START this fight; BUT THEY ARE GOING TO FINISH IT; and those who get in their way will do well to beware the wrath of an outraged people. This is not a threat; it is not even a warning; it is a prophecy which will be fulfilled when Citizen Patriots take back their own.

JEWISH PLOT TO "REMOVE" LOYAL U. S. ARMY OFFICERS (Edmondson Bulletin of May 10, 1937)

Rabbi Stephen Wise, Zionist Leader, and noted for his sympathies for several subversive movements, is the Editor of the Monthly Magazine 'Opinion.'

The April (1937) number carried the mention of three prizes awarded to writers on the subject: "The Way to Combat Anti-Semitism."

One of the prize-winners was Rabbi Victor Eppstein, graduate of the Jewish Institute of Religion. He says:

"The present program of palliative relief must give way to a program of fundamental reconstruction. American Democracy MUST BE SOCIALIZED by subjecting industrial production and distribution to the will of the Peoples' Congress. The first step is to ABOLISH the Federal veto and to enlarge the express powers of the National Government through immediate constitutional amendment. A GRADUAL MARCH IN THE DIRECTION OF SOCIALIZATION WILL FOLLOW.

"At the same time, energetic measures must be adopted to prevent the inevitable reactionary attempt to overthrow democracy. In America, let it be BY SYSTEMATICALLY REMOVING FROM KEY POSITIONS IN ARMY AND NATIONAL GUARD ALL OFFICERS WHOSE LOYALTY TO THE CONSTITUTION MAY BE QUALIFIED BY CLASS ALLEGIANCE."

Rabbi Wise is the leader of the American Jewish Congress, and his endorsement of Victor Eppstein's anti-American utterances implies the approval of leaders of Jewry in the United States.

A CHALLENGE TO AMERICAN FAIRPLAY (Made Sept. 1, 1937)

TO FELLOW PATRIOTS:

Trial of Robert Edward Edmondson, N. Y. City Publisher, indicted June 11, 1936, on a charge of libeling "all persons of the Jewish Religion," has been set for September 13, 1937, after a delay of about one year, during which time Mayor LaGuardia's alleged "danger to the peace of the community" has been allowed to roam at large, since the District Attorney has had the power at any time to bring the case to trial.

Justice Philip J. McCook of the State Supreme Court, on May 28, 1937, denied motion for removal of the case from the jurisdiction of the New York City General Sessions Courts, to the Supreme Court of Rockland or Westchester Counties; which motion was made on the ground that a fair trial in the midst of the greatest aggregation of Jews in the world is impossible because of their enormous secret politico-economic influence; and in consideration of the long list of invariably unfavorable rulings quoted heretofore.

Are patriotic citizens to be suppressed from exposing to their countrymen Communistic or other conspiracies to overthrow their government on the theory that it might "INCITE" THE FEELINGS OF EXCITABLE JEWS OF A NOTORIOUSLY "PACIFISTIC" MINORITY MADE JITTERY THROUGH CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT?

12 to 0 denials of defendant's relief motions in favor of the Jews have been made in New York City courts.

While financial aid is needed for an EFFECTIVE presentation of the Edmondson Case, this is not a personal solicitation for charity funds. I nurse no personal ambitions; nor have I a martyr complex. I metely desire to be of practical service to my country.

I repeat, this is not a charity-solicitation. BUT IT IS A CHALLENGE TO AMERICAN FAIRPLAY, and a Summons to High Duty.

The defendant has steadily maintained that a self-preservation fight should require no salesmanship.

This is YOUR fight.

If I am convicted, so is Free Speech,

With Freedom of Press further subverted-THE PUBLIC PERISHES.

Are those who refuse to act substantially against the acute danger worthy of and fit for Constitutional Liberty? They cannot dodge the consequences of dodging their responsibilities.

THINK IT OVER!

Edmondson Today—YOU Tomorrow!

WORLD CONGRESS ENDORSES EDMONDSON CRUSADE

In September, 1937, Defendant Edmondson received the following testimonial dated Sept. 4, 1937, signed by the delegates from 22 nations to an anti-lewish Congress assembled in Erfurt, Germany:

"Your case of World Jewry versus yourself which is to be tried on Sept. 13th, and which now has a world reputation, has been much discussed by those present at this conference, and admiration expressed for the valiant fight you are putting up on behalf of our Aryan Civilization against the permitious forces of Judan.

"We are sending this to show you that we are thinking of you, and admired you for your tenacity and great moral courage in righting this greatest of all tights against Jew domination of all we hold noble and sacred."

The following reply, sent to the members of that Congress, was broadcast:

"I have received your fraternal greeting containing the signatures of the representatives of 22 nations in convention assembled, endorsing my crusade in behalf of tree speech and national patriotism against International Jewry—World Enemy No. 1.

"This unqualified generous testimonial of commendation from the highest assemblage of our Noble Cause of Liberation has overwhelmed me, who am but an humble instrument.

"Adequately to express appreciation would require the gifted eloquence of my great countryman Patrick Henry, whose immortal "Give me Liberty or give me Death" brought freedom to America, and has ever been for me a source of inspiration.

"What can withstand embattled patriots of the civilized nations acting concertedly against the anti-nationalism of a Jewish International economic system made mad by 'the terrible power of the purse'—to quote the words of Zionist Leader Herzl?

"Although New York's Jewish Mayor LaGuardia instigated this free speech persecution on June 8, 1936, followed by my indictment June 11 on a charge of publishing a libel of 'all persons of the Jewish Religion,' the matter has again been postponed to Nov. 15, 1937, when my Gentile Counsel and I shall fearlessly face the court and demand acquittal in the name of justice.

"On with the self-preservation fight!"

Robert Edward Edmondfor

JEWISH "ROLL OF HONOR"

Based on a World Jewry poll, 120 "greatest living Jews" are in a Jewish "Hall of Fame" based on "contributions to humanity," as published Sept. 25, 1937, in the N. Y. Herald-Tribune. The following are included in this "Roll of Honor:"

Maxim Litvinoff, Soviet Communist Foreign Minister, bandit-criminal.

Leon Blum, Ex-French Socialist-Communist Premier, whose book "Du Mariage" favors incest.

Judah L. Magnes, American Rabbi who admits Jews are leaders in all revolutionary movements.

Felix Frankfurter, whom Ex-President Theodore Roosevelt branded as Bolshevistic.

Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reputed "Father" of the Communistic New Deal.

EDMONDSON TRIAL AGAIN POSTPONED

(Edmondson Bulletin of November 15, 1937)

UPON APPLICATION OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, trial of the Jewish Religion libel case against Robert Edward Edmondson, has again been put off to Monday, Feb. 7, 1938.

"THE PEOPLE ARE NOT READY FOR TRIAL AT THIS TIME" was the statement made by the District Attorney, notwithstanding the undisputed fact that the defendant has been held for seventeen months under heavy bail, large expense and in restricted conditions.

Is this equivalent to a confession that there IS no case against the defendant?

By the force of the circumstances involved, the defendant was obliged reluctantly to assent to further delay, despite his preparedness as implied by his having already subpoenaed FOR THE DEFENSE, for trial as of Nov. 15, the following partial list of witnesses—which the New York newspapers significantly called an "All Star Cast:"

Mayor F. H. LaGuardia, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, Bernard M. Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, James P. Warburg, Henry Morgenthau, Sr., Rabbi Sidney E. Goldstein, Congressman Samuel Dickstein, Columnist Walter Lippmann, U. S. Supreme Court Justice Brandeis' daughter Susan; Former "American Hebrew" President David A. Brown, Editor Samuel Margoshes of "The Jewish Day;" Communist M. J. Olgin; N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosenman, called "Founder" of Roosevelt's "Brain Trust" and Roosevelt's "Right Arm;" Charney Vladeck, James Waterman Wise, Rabbi Israel Goldstein, Col. Edward Mandel House; Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor of the Brooklyn "Jewish Examiner;" Prof. John Dewey; A. A. Berle, Jr., N. Y. City Chamberlain; Roger N. Baldwin, Director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

(The Edmondson Defense effected subpoena service on additional "star witnesses" Prof. Felix Frankfurter and Secretary of Labor Perkins while they attended The Survey Associates banquet at the Biltmore Hotel in N. Y. City on Dec. 2, 1937. Prof. Rexford G. Tugwell, Col. E. M. House and Gen. Hugh S. Johnson also have been subpoenaed to testify for the Defense at the post-poned trial on Feb. 7, 1938.)

The manner in which the various "princes" accepted subpoena service is amusing in some instances. Baruch, Rosenman, Lippmann accepted quietly. Samuel Untermyer was explosive—"I have never been summoned in this manner before; it is an outrage: I will break 'em in pieces!"

Rabbi Wise bellowed, when served in the hallway of his building after failure in his office, "I have been betrayed!"

Morgenthau meditatively commented: "Oh yes, Edmondson; he is finished!"

Rabbi Margoshes was at first mellow: "I shall be most happy to testify against Mr. Edmondson." The Process Server retorted: "But you are summoned to testify for defendant." Margoshes exploded: "That's all cock-eyed!"

Below are extracts from the three speeches of-

• (1) Captain Henry Hamilton Beamish, Founder of the Anti-Jewish movement in Great Britain, member of a prominent, old English family (Oct. 30, Oct. 31, Nov. 1):
• (2) Adrien Arcand, Leader of the National Unity Party of Canada (Oct. 30, Oct. 31, Nov. 1);
  • (3) Robert Edward Edmondson of New York City (Oct. 31, Nov. 1).

The addresses were delivered in New York City as follows: October 30, at the N. Y. Hippodrome; October 31 at a private banquet in the Harvard Club. November 1, 1937, to a private assembly in a prominent club house.

A SELF-PRESERVATION FIGHT By Robert Edward Edmondson

The high honor of welcoming to the U. S., Veterans Beamish and Arcand in the national patriotic movement against the International Jewish System, was alloted to Robert Edward Edmondson at the October 31 meeting of American leaders. Part of his address is given below:

"This is more than a happy event. The NEW HISTORY that is in the making will

"Captain Beamish, Veteran and Dean of this historic movement of Liberation, REAL representative of the Jew-opposed people of Great Britain, brings a world-message of TRUTH

"You will have the priceless privilege of listening to Nestorian words of wisdom from a great-hearted Soldier-Statesman who KNOWS whereof he speaks by the unimpeachable authority of two-score years of SELFLESS PERSONAL SERVICE to a world-

"Down from the North has come Adren Arcand, Leader of the National Unity Party of Canada, a gifted young 'White Knight without reproach or shame,' a flame of youthful ardor, bearing his 'Key to the Mystery' and a clarion call to arms from the embattled patriots of historic Quebec, organized and ready to defend God, Home and

"In this great crisis, can we doubt that were the Immortal Lincoln alive today he would rejected: Let the people KNOW THE TRUTH—and the WORLD is safe?"

"We stand uncompromisingly FOR the basic constructive principles that make for human welfare and REAL progress. We also stand unalterably and ACTIVELY 'ANTI' lewish ideologies and their subversive practices.

"'Not to be ANTI is to SURRENDER the FIGHTING Spirit,' warns Nesta H. Webster, celebrated author of 'World Revolution.' To win this war, you must not only have knowledge and courage, but a selfless 'last ditch determination.' Without it, you are LICKED before you start.

"Fellow Patriots Beamish and Arcand, as an America Patriot I warmly welcome you to my Country and to 'Kosher' New York. We stand shoulder to shoulder with you and all White Men in this militant defense against that Jewish System which is destroying Nationalism and Western Civilization.

We have not been idle here in these United States. Your speaker got himself indicted and is to be tried on a charge of libeling 'all persons of the Jewish Religion' millions of them everywhere dead and alive

"This feat was accomplished, not by attacking the so-called lewish Religion, but by exposing the COMMUNISTIC POLITICO-ECONOMIC SUBVERSIONS OF THE

Many people have insisted that this case would never come to trial. That dangerous premise has heavily handicapped us financially. Who wants to help where apparently

"Knowing that this enemy NEVER gives up, I personally have not shared that opinion, and have gone steadily ahead with exhaustive preparations, It there IS a dismissal, it will be due to that THOROUGH preparation at heavy expense, combined with frequent costly legal broadcasts exposing the LAW-weakness of the persecutors.

"Above all else, the false leaders of the Jewish System fear adverse publicity, personal initiative, forceful courage and calculated audacity.

"Our only problem is financial. There should be behind this Americanism movement now hundreds of thousands of dollars to make effective the work of thousands of parties.

"This momentous matter rests on an exceptionally broad foundation. For the first time in history, International Jewry has been publicly exposed as a predatory SYSTEM—an ECONOMIC system. What happened?

"A FALSE camouflage RELIGIOUS indictment was brought. Ponder this: Are ECONOMICS and the Jewish RELIGION the same thing? The economic exposure remains unchallenged. It cannot be refuted.

"The Jewish System of these 'Perpetual Aliens' —a term Captain Beamish tells me was applied to them by Lord Chief Justice Coke of England—has broken down our

Economic System.

"It has rotted our politics by Bribery, Blackmail and False Propaganda; it has corrupted our Judiciary with complicated rules of procedure that prostitute our constitutions; it has converted into 'kept men of the press' our Journalists and Publishers through sinister advertising control, overthrowing the Free Speech First Line of Defense; it has publicly ridiculed our National Patriotism and pacifized us into cowards and politoons.

"With whose resources has this 'Plan of Hell' carried on:

"YOURS AND MINE!

"'How DEEP are the sources of your indignation?'

" 'When will the IRON in America's soul be touched:

"The Edmondson Defense goes into Court with clean hands, unafraid, and armed with the Might of Truth.

"But we do so under the shadow of a colossal economic power, and with a pitiful

financial inadequacy

"If convicted, we shall appeal—to the United States Supreme Court—IF IT RUINS US; for we are in a life and death struggle for EXISTENCE.

"WE MUST WIN"

"SEGREGATE THE JEWS"

By Captain Beamish

"We are engaged in the greatest war history has ever known. The question is,

whether the Jew shall rule the world, or we white men.

"The chairman has said that I was the originator of the movement in England. After taking part in three wars, I was tired seeing millions of people wiped out for this race of Asiatics.

'Jews, being aliens in our midst, they must be segregated.

"The Boer Wat occurred 37 years ago. I found all the gold and diamond mines were owned by Jews; that Rothstein controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Samuels controlled oil; Baum controlled other minerals, and Moses controlled base metals. Anything those people touch they inevitably pollute.

What we have to realize today is that the Iews are working overtime to bring on

another war. The position is serious.

"There are very few newspapers not owned or controlled by Jews except in the

countries that have named the Bolshevists as the enemies of mankind

"In discussing the Jew question, we must be conscious of the fact that we are white people. We must not mix race with religion.

(1) Kill them, which is out of the question.

Sterilize them, which is out of the question.

(3) Segregate them—and there is only one place, Madagascar."

"I have been in many countries, but conditions in New York are perfectly appalling

"The whole essense of this fight is moral courage, Robert Edward Edmondson is a great fighter. Large numbers of people will die for their country, but few will live for it.

"In 1848 the word "anti-Semitic" was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word "Jew." The right word for them is "Jew." We are not against the Syrians,

"I implore all of you to be accurate—call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open and you were then free Now be has got you absolutely by the throat—that is your reward.

"Who rules Russia? How do you account for the fact that out of 550 commissars

in Russia only 17 are Russians?

"You must have leadership—not dictatorship. In England there is not a soul w

would follow. You must get a leader and define definitely what you stand for

"I have discovered the spot for the segregation of the Jews. It is the only place in the world—Madagascar. The map of the island shows it to be 1,000 miles long, and it will hold 100,000,000 people. Segregation is the solution of our problem, and there is the place for segregation of the Jews."

A JEWISH CRIMINAL PLAN

by Adrien Arcand

"I think that all of us here are fighting Communism. I do it politically

"Many times I have read in the press of this country and of my own, in all manners of titles, that I am a Nazi and in the pay of Chancellor Hitler. So was it said of my good friend Beamish. Well, Mr. Beamish began his work 40 years ago, and since Chancellor Hitler is 44 years old, Mr. Beamish must have begun to receive Hitler's money when the latter was only 4 years old!

"Being not a German nor in Germany, I cannot be a Nazi. And I am no more in Hitler's pay than the great Edouard Drumont of France who fought the same fight for 50 years; no more in Hitler's pay than the great Edward the First of England who expelled the Jews from his country in order to save it.

The more Communism has been fought in the last ten years, the more progress it has made in our midst. There is a reason for it.

"Communism has been fought as an intangible whilst it is the most material thing in this world.

"Communism is no doctrine, no set of principles. It is but a criminal plan.

"It is not by hazard that wherever Marxism comes to power, Jews also immediately come to power. In Soviet Russia, out of 550 higher officials 88 per cent are Jewish.

"When it came to Spain we saw Azana and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela-Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and a dozen other Jews; in Belgium, Marxian Socialism brought to power Vandervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum, Mandel, Zyromsky; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves.

"Jews, in all their sacred and profane books, fanaticize themselves with the idea that they are 'The Chosen People;' that the whole world belongs to them by birthright; that all Gentile races were made to be servants of Israel; that Jews must and will some day own the whole wealth of this planet,

"How are they to get that wealth? If they use force, they know well that they will be repelled by force.

"So, they have invented a devilish scheme,

"There is nothing in Communism but a Jewish conspiracy to grab the world.

"It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is—a Jewish scheme invented by Jews, profitable only to the Jews—that it has progressed against all opposition to it.

"One of Jew slogans is 'TOLERANCE,' which is the basis of the other slogan 'No race, color or creed discrimination.' The Jew has only to yell 'TOLERANCE,' and the whole of Gentility immediately becomes paralyzed.

"But what is Tolerance? It is a word used only for evil. Can you tolerate Virtue, Good, Justice, Beauty? No, because they have rights by and in themselves. They exist by right and not by tolerance.

"On the other hand, things that have no rights, as an epidemic of vice, a fault, a defect, we tolerate.

"In consequence of it all, we have seen a handful of anti-Christian Orientals conquer political, economic and social power in Occidental Christian countries.

"The world is not brought to Communism 'just like that;' and people won't renounce their property from night to day. There were long preparations for that stage

"It began with the so-called democracy brought by the Jews through the Illuminatti one hundred and fifty years ago.

"Having a hold of the upper Internationale, the GOLD one, they got a hold of the lower one, the proletarian; and they squeeze the bourgeoisie between the two, so as to eliminate the only remaining national forces of resistance.

"One of your great patriots once said: 'Give me liberty or give me death.' I believe in more than that, for liberty is not a thing to be demanded, but to be worked for, fought for, WON.

"When a patriot can no more mention the enemies of his nation and faith without being arrested—as has happened in this city—it is time that people think of recovering their lost liberty.

"Jews control 90 per cent of the world and national powers. They have but one item more to get: POLITICAL POWER. They have the economic, that of propaganda, that of International controls. AND COMMUNISM IS THE INSTRUMENT FOR GIVING THEM THAT POLITICAL POWER.

"The old so-called democratic parties could not prevent the coming of Communism and could not prevent its rapid growth; they could not prevent its triumph. A NEW MOVEMENT ONLY CAN DO IT.

"I want to express my gratitude and profound admiration for my friend Beamish who, with his personal experience, has been my master in the mission upon which I am engaged. He has schooled me for the past seven years. I admire Beamish the more because he has been brought up in one of the greatest English families on the steps of the English throne. He could have had one of the finest careers in the higher ranks of England; but preferred to forget about himself and to look only for the release of civilization from the hands of Jews. Every place he has been received as Warrior No. 1, for the last forty years, in this great international movement.

"You will have presently in your country the greatest opportunity ever presented to you—a trial. I have had sixty law suits in the last seven years. Our movement has spent more than \$540,000 up to date to arrive at the starting point of a political movement. I have had many trials with Jews. I had to flee twice from machine guns in Montreal. I have suffered in my printing plant three fires and complete destruction of linotypes—lost \$75,000. I understand perfectly what will be and can be the fight of Mr. Edmondson.

"In the history of the anti-Jewish movement there has been no such important law suit as this Edmondson case, brought by Mayor LaGuardia.

"In the Edmondson trial I fear the Kings of Israel who have been subpoensed will not want to be questioned on Communism, finance, race, etc., regarding statements they have made in the past.

"I have read all that was printed about it; I have read all that Mr. Edmondson has published about it. Never, even in the Canadian cases, The Cairo trial, or the political case in Berne, was a law suit so soundly based, or in greater detail, than is the Edmondson case here in this city. The foundation is perfect.

"Whether he wins or loses the people must know it, as the daily papers will report

it.

"Profit by our experience. Go into politics and take power by legal means before the Reds do it. In France patriots had leagues, but no political party. When election came, they had no candidates.

"A COUNTRY THAT CANNOT FIND LEADERSHIP TO SAVE ITSELF, DESERVES TO FALL."

THE TREASON OF TOLERANCE

(An address by Robert Edward Edmondson before Members of The American Nationalist Party in New York, January 27, 1938)

The subject of this address is "The Treason of Tolerance." By its thought-less preachment, great harm is being done.

This Fetish of Tolerance is now our most deadly foe, for it is tantamount to Treason to Free Speech through indirect suppression.

We are heavily handicapped in combatting it, for we do not want to antagonize a possible friend. Well does the enemy understand this psychology, and play upon it.

It is singular that tolerance is international at the source, and that it is being propagandized by the false leadership of an international people who are anti-national. "We are on the side of Liberalism AGAINST NATIONALISM" says Rabbi Freehof in "Race, Nation or Religion."

I warn patriots in this battle to beware of ALL anti-national internationalism, for it is used as a wearing-down diversion or process of attrition—and we must understand that diversion is subversion, whether by friend or foe.

In the final analysis, we are in a war between two great elemental forces—Nationalism, directed by Patriotism; and Internationalism, engineered by the Jewish Economic System.

(Note: Our Republic is a great group of individuals, for mutual protection merged into the single organism of an individual nation among other nations, each with individualized characteristics, which are the soul of real progress—except where Communism has destroyed individualism and personal initiative and leveled all individuals down into a mass bereft of intelligence, slavishly surrendering national sovereignty to an internationalist World Government, like the "UN".)

American citizens have tolerantly leaned over backwards until they got "toleritis."—Was that the inspiration of Emma Lazarus' Statute of Liberty poem calling upon the old world to "Send us the wretched refuse of your teeming shores"?

We got that "refuse"!

Tolerance operates on a one-way street as handled by the majority. Minority tolerance of the majority is flapdoodle.

At the expense of Gentility, Jewry huddles by itself, solidifies its unity, nurses its own interest first—and then unctuously calls for mutual tolerance.

Says Rabbi Krim in his booklet "Liberal Judaism and Liberal Christianity": "The chasm dividing Jew and Christian is too deep to make a meeting of the two possible."

And yet the Jews call for tolerance of their "uniqueness."

Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel says in his "You Gentiles" book: "Our two ways of life are not merely different—they are opposed IN MORTAL ENMITY."

And in his next address Rabbi Wise beats his breast and bellows for more tolerance.

When you find a poisonous snake in your home, do you TOLERATE it? It is written that we should "Love Good and Hate Evil"—not that we should tolerate evil.

Were the money-changers tolerated in the ancient temple—or were they lashed out with a whip?

Virtue and truth have inherent rights. We do not tolerate rights. They are unalienable. Evil has no rights. Why should we compromise with a deadly enemy? Are we going to crucify ourselves on a Fetish of Tolerance double-cross?

"There is a limit at which forebearance ceases to be a virtue," said the great English statesman, Edmund Burke. We have PASSED THE LIMIT!

This campaign has been maliciously called an emotional program of hatred of Jews. In reality, it is an educational-defense-crusade for God, Home and Country.

True patriots love country unselfishly, and obey the High Command, to hate, not Jews, but the evil things their politico-economic System is doing to destroy America.

We patriots want no evil violence against Jews; and we shall tolerate none toward us of, by and for Jews.

Error lay in the fact that we did not fully take into consideration that the "Great Power of the Press"—America's main medium for exchanging information—has been almost completely destroyed by the "Terrible Power of the Purse."

Let me give you a timely concrete example of the confusion-strategy tactics of this enemy who ballyhoos tolerance.

Endowed with equipment to apply practically the principle: "Publicity is the Cure for Public Evils," I conceived it to be my duty and privilege to hold high the Torch of Truth in connection with the Jewish Problem.

For publicly exposing Jewish Communists, N. Y. Mayor LaGuardia in June, 1936, denounced me in the newspapers as a religious bigot and fanatic.

Now "that's all cockeyed," to employ a Jewish wisecrack. Is Communism a religion? The Mayor had me indicted for alleged libel of "all persons of the Jewish-Religion." I was attacking Jewish Communists.

Are said "All Persons" communistic? Does gross materialism plus Communism equal atheism? Communist Leader Bukharin declared: "Religion and Communism are incompatible." Therefore, Communism isn't religion.

Note that a religious indictment was brought for analyzing politico-economics.

The Mayor called me a bigot. Did you ever hear of a man not a member of any church branded "religious bigot?" My strong supporters include many Catholics, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Methodists, Lutherans, Christian Scientists, Mohammedans—at home and abroad.

He also branded me a fanatic. My principal business for more than 30 years has been that of politico-economic investment-analyst. Fanaticism and the analytical judicial temperament are also fundamentally incompatible.

The real issue in the Edmondson Case is not libel. It is Freedom of the Press. But Jews, it seems, cannot "tolerate" a Free Press, for the highest official of the metropolis of America has arraigned Free Speech before the New York Bar.

Today we are confronted with: "Survive or Perish"—as a Nation, as a People, as a Civilization. It is just as simple as that—a question of existence.

Now is the Eleventh Hour of Decision. We stand at the Cross Roads. The Right leads to Freedom and Happiness. The Left goes down to slavery.

Which are YOU going to travel? I have made my choice—TO FIGHT ON THE RIGHT FOR HONOR AND COUNTRY!

"WE ARE READY" INSTRUCTIONS TO DEFENSE COUNSEL

New York, N. Y., Jan. 28, 1938.

Dear Mr. Wise:

In the case of The People of the State of New York vs. Robert Edward Edmondson, Indictment 209220, June 11, 1936, by a Jewish majority Grand Jury, instigated by Jewish Mayor LaGuardia of N. Y. City, alleging criminal libel of "all persons of the Jewish Religion" in news bulletins issued by him devoted to exposing the IRRELIGIOUS Communistic politico-economic anti-Americanism of the Jewish Financial System.

This is my formal authority as defendant, to you as counsel, with regard to the defense-position Feb. 7.

Please state to the Court that the defendant is (1) prepared and ready for trial; (2) that he is unable to consent with the prosecuting District Attorney to any further postponement in view of the 20 months delay in this case, during any time of which the prosecution had power to try it; (3) that while he may submit to postponement by court order, it will be under protest in conservation of his fundamental rights as outlined in Amendment VI of the U. S. Constitution, reading in part:

In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a SPEEDY and public trial, by an impartial jury * * * "

In determining this procedure I have been guided by factors outlined below, in addition to the foregoing, as well as by the heavy expenses to which I have been unfairly subjected through unnecessary delay.

It may be unique in criminal law for a defendant to seek trial; but this case itself is historically unique, as well as outrageously farcical and a disgrace to American jurisprudence.

The Jewish minority people of the State now find themselves on the horns of a dilemma. They do not really WANT this trial with its inevitable BOOM-ERANG exposures. Neither do they want dismissal. BUT THEY DO WANT CONTINUED RESTRICTIVE PERSECUTION OF THE DEFENDANT WITH ITS FINANCIAL ATTRITION. They DO want SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH. And they are apparently in a conspiracy to effect such violation of the Constitutions of the State of New York and of the United States.

For the Edmondson Defense or The Courts to be ACCESSORIES to such continued Persecution, Suppression and Conspiracy would be a monstrous perversion of Justice. WE MUST NOT BE A PARTY TO THAT!

After more than a year's consideration, you have assured the defendant that, in your opinion, he has acted within the law; that the important witnesses summoned must testify in a way such as to justify his patriotic publications.

Furthermore, under the existing circumstances, another postponement "BY CONSENT" would (1) unjustly deprive the defendant of his patriotic support; (2) of his own self-respect; and (3) most important of all, since they are the real issues, seriously damage the great causes of Free Speech and National Patriotism.

If the Court issues a postponement mandate, then, as a matter of right and justice, ask that bail be returned, and that the defendant be released on his own recognizance in view of the fact that he wants an impartial trial, and is ready.

As I have repeatedly stated to you, this case offers the opportunity of ages for bringing a gigantic inhuman subversion into the arena of corrective public debate—my immediate objective—which would effect emancipation by peaceful methods, instead of through Communistic civil war, as threatened.

If the court refuses dismissal, the defendant will appear before it with clean hands, unafraid, prepared and ready to put before the jury THE WHOLE TRUTH

A FATEFUL DECISION

Before going into court, my wife and I talked the matter over. I said, "You must share with me the responsibility of saying Ready for Trial. If the prosecution agrees, our entire modest fortune may be used in carrying the case to the U. S. Supreme Court. I have decided on my course. What is your judgment"?

"I know your decision," my wife soberly replied. "Mine is the same. We shall go into court with clean hands, unafraid, trusting to a Higher Power, which I do not believe will desert us in this selfless fight."

EDMONDSON TRIAL OFF AGAIN

On application of District Attorney Dewey's Office, the Edmondson Jewish Religion criminal libel trial was again postponed by court order, on Feb. 7, to April 18, 1938, despite the "We are ready" announcement of Defense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr. Bail was reduced from \$2,500 to \$1,000.

Since Former District Attorney Dodge, according to the N. Y. Jewish Day of June 10, 1936, admitted there was no law covering the situation, how can the District Attorney's office EVER prepare a case when no offense was com-

mitted? Editor Samuel Margoshes said:

"When months ago some of us appealed to District Attorney Dodge against the torrent of anti-Semitic (Edmondson) circulars then inundating the streets of New York, the answer was that he was powerless to cope with the situation, UNPROVIDED FOR IN THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK."

AMERICANISM FOR AMERICA!

(A Feb. 10, 1938, address in part before American Nationalist Party in N. Y. City, by Robert Edward Edmondson)

Two subjects are contained in this address. The first part analyzes Fascism, the second, Alienism. I wish to put myself on record by the direct question and answer form.

I am more and more frequently asked: Are you a Fascist?

The answer is: I am not, I am an American Patriot,

Are you in favor of Nazism for the United States?

No. That is for Germany.

Are you an enemy of Fascism or Nazism?

I am not.

Webster's International Dictionary of 1935 described "Fascism" thus: "An Italian organization originated by loyal patriots to oppose all radical elements in the country, such as Bolshevists, Communists, and the like."

Do you believe Communism is Jewish?

I do. It is a tool used by the Jewish Politico-Economic System to subjugate National Patriotism to the Jewish lust for power.

Once the American People grasp the idea that Jews and Communism are allies; that Soviet socialistic motive-power is Jewish; that an alien element is trying to overthrow Americanism and substitute a poisonous anti-national doctrine for it—the result will be no longer in doubt.

For America, I am against the Dictatorship Principle. Yet I will say this: As the preservation of American institutions is worth any sacrifice, if some temporary power-centralization becomes imperative in self-preservation, then true American patriots will do at the last ditch what is necessary to save themselves, their homes and their country.

ALIENISM: WHAT IS IT?

I now come to the second section of this address.

I find that some foreign-born citizens protest the use of the world "alien," holding that it refers to them.

If foreign-born men and women have their first papers, they are not aliens, in the eyes of the law.

Any citizen of the United States, native or foreign-born, who by action is loyal to Americanism first, is definitely NOT an alien.

But think over this point: Any citizen of foreign descent who imagines himself alien, IS NOT ALL-AMERICAN; for he has not yet absorbed true Americanism.

Know your Constitution, Citizens of the Republic. Understand its Living Principles, its Vital Force, its unparalleled Endowment of Individual Freedom. Then give it the militant devotion it inspires in true patriots.

I repeat here the following declaration I made on Nov. 19, 1935, during an address before the American National Labor Party;

"We patriots did not START this fight—but we are going to finish it"!

ARMAGEDDON HERE?

An Invitation Address (in part) Before a Patriotic Group of Over 200, at the Home of Miss Caroline Mead at New Milford, N. J., on Feb. 14, 1938, by Robert Edward Edmondson)

It is a high honor to be asked to appear before such a loyal group of real Americans—men and women who, informally gathering in this patriotic home in defense of their country, are willing to consecrate to it their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor.

It is not easy to find words to express my profound respect and deep admiration for the splendid type of American womanhood exemplified by Miss Mead. A gentlewoman by birth and nature, she has boldly taken her stand. Abusive and threatening attacks by the enemy have not weakened her high resolve to defend, protect and preserve. I salute you, Caroline Mead, as one of that fearless band which today is making history. It is such as you, weak in physical force but strong in spirit, who really win the GREAT crusades.

We have been hearing much of late as to the next greatest war of wars. Fellow-citizens, we are right now in the greatest war in all history.

Two tremendous world elements confront each other. The Evil of Materialism challenges the power of the Spirit of Good.

Your speaker is not attempting to preach a sermon. He is a hard-boiled veteran journalist. He but employs the gifts of reportorial analysis and dramatic publicity to accumulate facts and present them in understandable form to his fellow-citizens, in the earnest hope that through enlightenment they may be spared many unnecessary supreme sacrifices in this momentous struggle for existence.

If you accept the theory that this is a war on materialism, you must also accept my thesis that the solution for the Jewish Problem, which I believe to be at the bottom of our troubles, is essentially ECONOMIC—not religious, racial or individual so far as America is concerned.

Before my indictment nearly two years ago on the charge of libeling "all persons of the Jewish Religion," my exposures of the enemy had been confined to politico-economic subversions, holding that "the terrible power of the purse" was the most deadly weapon of the Jewish System. Since then, in self-defense, I have been forced to discuss the religious angle; finding that Jews always conduct their destructive war against Gentility by hiding behind screens of so-called racial and religious persecution.

These United States were Christian-founded. The Constitution of the United States ends with this witnessing: "In the Year of Our Lord"—who was Jesus Christ, not the Jewish Jehovah.

"This is a Christian Nation," is an extract from the "Holy Trinity" case decision by U. S. Supreme Court per Justice Brewer, Feb. 29, 1892.

Now, do we intend to preserve such a righteous and precious heritage of freedom, or shall we become the economic slaves of a materialistic minority with an obsession to rule the world?

Patriarch Cristea, head of the Greek Orthodox Church, Rumania, was quoted in an article in the N. Y. Herald Tribune Aug. 17, 1937, as follows:

'THE JEWS HAVE CAUSED AN EPIDEMIC OF CORRUPTION AND SOCIAL UNREST. They monopolize The Press, which, with the aid of foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Rumanians. To defend ourselves is a NATIONAL AND PATRIOTIC DUTY—not Anti-Semitic.

"Lack of measures to get rid of this PLAGUE would indicate that we are lazy COWARDS who let ourselves be CARRIED ALIVE TO OUR GRAVES.

"Why should the Jews enjoy the privilege of living LIKE PARASITES on our backs? Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Rumanian CHRISTIAN BLOOD? It is logical AND HOLY to react against them."

The LIBERATING POWER in this fight is FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. The QUICK way to win is to establish a national daily newspaper which carries NO ADVERTISING. Under patriotic editorial dictatorship, within six months such a publication would have a 6,000,000 circulation and in a year would prove to be the greatest financial investment ever offered to the American public—to say nothing of saving the Republic. For such a grand patriotic service financial millions ought to rush to defense.

In solution, this problem is definitely neither racial nor religious in America. It is ECONOMIC. By sinister usurpation of key posts the International Jewish System has obtained control of our Financial Dynamo, New York, and of the Warburg-created Federal Reserve, which has enabled it to dominate our Political Power Center, Washington, aided by advertising subversion of the Press. The rank and file of Americans do not yet realize that the whole country is invisibly governed by a foreign element through the "terrible power of the purse."

All Jews are not deliberately subversive, but all are under a master-control which victimizes its own people—the greatest regimented solidarity in the world.

Jews decline to publicly discuss the Jewish Problem. They enter a general denial, refusing to be catechized. That is un-American. A Representative Republic like ours cannot exist without freedom of debate. We demand public solution of our problems by the Rule of Individual Reason—not through Communistic violence.

Jews have been expelled from almost every civilized nation in the past. That means segregation in the future.

Without ambition except to be of service to my country, I cater to no leadership complex. I have never shirked responsibility—and shall not now in this crisis. Believing that circumstances create and draft true leaders, I am ready to co-operate with any patriotic group not wasting time with effects. I follow no policy that takes counsel with fear and compromise. No important issue was ever won by ignoring The Truth. In this self-preservation fight, pussyfooting is suicide, for we have "A Rendezvous With Death."

In conclusion, Ladies and Gentlemen, let me say that the Star Spangled Banner will wave just so long as the Land of the Free is also the Home of the Brave.

LECTURE ON AMERICANISM

(An Invitation Address (in part) delivered on Feb. 24, 1938, at the Fifth Anniversary of the German-American Bund, New York City, by Robert Edward Edmondson.)

A native American, I esteem it an honor, as a guest speaker, to address tonight your German-American association, whose heroic brothers abroad held back the red tide of Jewish Communism.

I am officially informed that every member of the Bund is a full citizen of the United States. In addition to that, J. Edgar Hoover, Chief of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, recently gave it a clean bill of health in a thousand-page report declaring nothing anti-American could be found in the organization's activities.

Have you noted the latest news "FOR AND AGAINST," in the N. Y. City Communist Gerson Current Case?

"For" the DEFENCE: Simon W. Gerson and Gilbert Goodkind, Assistants to Manhattan Borough President Stanley M. Isaacs, with the N. Y. City Jewish Lawyers Guild backing the bunch.

"For" the PROSECUTION: The American Legion by State Commander Jeremiah F. Cross; Maurice Stember, State Legion Adjutant; Attorney S. M. Birnbaum, who files ouster suit before N. Y. Supreme Court Justice B. L. Shientag; Abraham Rosenblum, State Legion Judge-Advocate— and who else do you suppose? None other than Samuel Untermyer.

APPEAL JUDGE: Gov. Herbert H. Lehman of N. Y. State.

What a howling farce! And Communist Leader Browder brands American Legion tactics as Fascist. 'Jews everywhere.'

Noting the singular set-up, since the Jewish Veterans Order bars Gentiles from membership, patriots are wondering why American Legionnaires not only admit but elect Jews to rule over them in their own camp? The American Legion will futilely fight Communism twenty more years if it refuses to attack the Jewish Cause.

Manhattan Borough President Isaacs says "The Communist Party is legally organized under the laws of the United States." Yet in 1925 the party was outlawed by the U. S. Supreme Court, whose verdict has not been enforced by the Federal authorities for some secret reason.

We patriots want no "thoroughly socialized democracy" like that demanded by the Rabbinical Assembly of America as an "escape" from European Communism and Fascism. Our Representative Republic suits us. The God of our Fathers is the ONLY dictatorship Christian America will accept.

Are you a "Facist"?—I am asked. The answer is:

No. I am vigilantly PRO-American.

Briefly, I am an American Patriot.

Are you inclined toward Italian Fascism for America?

No. The dictatorship-regimentation thereof is un-American. In a bulletin of April 22, 1935, headed. "Roosevelt Impeachable," I charged that the "Liberties of our people had been Communistically suppressed and Fascistically centralized" by the New Dealers.

Do you favor German Nazism for the United States?

I do not

But—Nationalist, Fascist, Nazi or Vigilante, we ALL agree on the MAIN issue in this self-preservation fight—we are Anti-Jewish because the materialistic Jewish System is destroying our blood-bought liberties.

To his Army of Liberation my revered countryman, George Washington welcomed the great German von Steuben, the Polish hero Kosciusko, and the French General Lafayette. What better example could an American patriot emulate today than to welcome to this self-preservation fight against International Communism, the volunteer patriot-sons of German descent?

Then you stand to the last ditch for American Government under its written Constitution?

I do. I believe, with Gladstone, that, as originally written, "it is the greatest document ever struck off by the hand and brain of man." It has been Communistically subverted while we patriots were off guard.

Do you believe rescue can be effected without supreme sacrifices?

No. It is our job to educate citizens to the danger as fast as possible.

George Washington, the Father of Our Country, endorsed vigilance in these warning farewell words: "The batteries of internal and external enemies will be constantly and actively—often covertly and insidiously directed against your Political Fortress. Watch over its preservation with JEALOUS care."

When the Washington Political Power Center becomes subverted—as it has been by an alien "terrible power of the purse"—state communities must form Patriotic Vigilance Committees to devise ways and means to recapture rights wrongfully seized.

And when their priceless heritages have been rescued and restored, militant American Vigilantes voluntarily return to the arts of peace—their Principle of Self-Government having been patriotically vindicated without the dangers of a central dictatorship.

I will say this: If Communism does gain the ascendency in the United States, then it may be imperative temporarily to establish some form of central coalition authority. To save Americanism is worth any sacrifice.

Let me repeat briefly: I am an American Vigilante Patriot, not a German Nazi Patriot, nor an Italian Fascist Patriot. I am for Americanism in America.

I am an enemy of no patriot who is not at war with my country. I am an enemy of Jewish Internationalists, who have no country, who are anti-national, and who are making war on the United States.

And I am an eternal foe of those 'two-fold more the children of hell'—Gentile traitors who have betrayed country and race.

U. S. Constitution, Section 4, Art. IV, provides:

"The United States shall guarantee to every state in the union a republican form of government." Our 48 republican states are not democracies.

Therefore, when Washington invades or usurps any of the functions of a Republic State, the retained rights of the citizens are affected, and the citizens owe a duty to each other to resist any such Federal subversion, using reserved powers.

I am asked: Do you think we shall have to get rid of the Constitution before we can remove the Jewish Subversion?

I do not. Such an idea is born of brain-twisted propaganda.

By decision in the Supreme Court of 1878, Reynolds vs. the U. S., for practicing polygamy, Mormons were deprived of citizenship, property rights and other privileges granted by the Constitution, because such "religious practices" were held to be inconsistent with the American Political Philosophy and dangerous to the peace and SAFETY of the State.

No minorities have constitutional special privileges in this country. Our political plan contemplates a single organism. "Equal opportunity for all, special privilege to none!"

When Jewish politico-economic practices are shown to be destroying the peace and safety of the State, can there be any doubt that the citizen-majority will protect itself by a Constitutional amendment specifically providing for the disfranchisement and deportation of deadly alien internal enemies?

To those whose minds are not closed, our enemies are not hard to identify. Their own words confess the treason. Zionist leader Herzl admitted publicly in England that Jews regard Gentiles as "A Common Enemy." Talmudic quotations say Jewry is "living in a state of war" with all other peoples. Chicago Rabbi Freehof, in "Race, Nation or Religion," says: "What stands in our way everywhere in the world is modern NATIONALISM. That is our chief enemy." The Chicago Jewish Sentinel of September 24, 1935, supports his attitude. "It is the horrible figure of NATIONALISM, political and economic, which grins and mocks at us everywhere."—London Jewish Chronicle of August 13, 1937.

Heed your hopes, fellow-patriots, not your fears. In this fight for right, have faith that lies will be burned to ashes by the Fire of Truth.

Irrevocably believing that true Americanism is worth any sacrifice, I stand committed to militant and vigilant Patriotism against anti-national Internationalism.

We Gentile people did not start this greatest war in all history.

We are NOT Aggressors—We are DEFENDERS!

AMERICAN NATIONALIST PARTY

Following is a self-explanatory statement made by Robert Edward Edmondson at the March 17th, 1938, meeting of the American Nationalst Party in New York City:

In November, 1937, The American Nationalist Party (name selected later) was proposed by Stanley Alexander Smith of New Jersey to a number of New York anti-Jewish men.

As originally submitted to the group called by him, including Robert Edward Edmondson, the plan was completely Fascist.

When asked for an expression of opinion Mr. Edmondson promptly announced that he was a Constitutionalist, not a Fascist, and he could not therefore join such an organization.

Mr. Edmondson also stated, however, that since all the group were apparently anti-Jewish he would be willing to accede to their request to act as an unofficial advisor, and speak as guest speaker from their platform when invited, provided he was allowed to express his convictions freely; but that he could join no political party which omitted to identify the cause of the Communism which is destroying the Republic.

Upon being requested to do so as an editor, Mr. Edmondson removed from the Party platform all the important Fascistic elements.

Robert Edward Edmondson now (April 18, 1938) wishes to say that, following the resignation of all but one of the original officers of the Party, he also has withdrawn all support from it; that while he spoke before it while it permitted Freedom of Speech regarding the Jewish Question; he never joined it; that he will no longer speak at any of its meetings because of a recent statement that "good Jews" would be admitted to membership.

CREATING UNPAYABLE DEBT

(Edmondson Call to Patriots March 16, 1938)

Fellow-Patriots:

. Arthur Kitson, the world's greatest independent monetary economist, said in the British National Review of March, 1935:

"The aim of the International Financiers is world control by the creation of inextinguishable debt." In correspondence with me, before he died recently, Mr. Kitson made it clear that the International Financiers were Jewish, urging me not to falter in this fight for self-preservation.

It may be remembered that reports were published in the newspapers in 1935 reproducing figures showing that the Roosevelt Jewish Radical Administration in three years had spent over 24 billion dollars, which equalled the entire expenditure made by the Government during 124 years previous.

Commenting upon this, Washington Correspondent G. R. Brown significantly published: "The whole New Deal crazy quilt seems to have a distinct pattern once the idea is accepted that huge expenditures have been made, not for relief-public works recovery, but for the DELIBERATE purpose of CREATING DEBT. Debt is ESSENTIAL to the New Deal. Without it, a public opinion appreciating the necessity of some day paying it off, could not be built up sufficiently to endorse confiscation of wealth."

Now, taxes have approximated confiscatory figures. Doesn't this prove the truth of the old saying that "the power to tax is the power to destroy?"

Let me quote from the Congressional Record—the late Congressman McFadden talking:

"There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this country has fallen into the hands of the International Money Changers. Why should the fact be hidden? Is it not because those who have betrayed the United States are afraid to face the consequences?

"There has not been an administration since our advent into the great world war in which Bernard M. Baruch has not been a chief political, economic and financial advisor; AND EVERY ADMINISTRATION THAT LISTENED TO HIM HAS CARRIED US DEEPER AND DEEPER INTO FINANCIAL CHAOS."

Are we in financial chaos now? Let me quote to you one single sentence, pregnant with meaning, taken from a letter published in the N. Y. Post March 9, 1938, signed "Bernard M. Baruch." Here is the latest Baruch confession:

"I DID NOT CONDEMN ANY BIT OF LEGISLATION UPON THE STATUTE BOOKS."

According to that statement, he is FOR Communistic New Deal acts

In "The Riddle of the Jews' Success" by Roederich-Stoltheim, we find this: "The enormous liberation of energy caused by the speculative principle of the Jew, deceives as to the true state of affairs. The last reserves of national energy are forced into action, which must end in exhaustion."

ALL THIS SPELLS DEBT—UNPAYABLE DEBT! Created by Jewish speculation with other people's money through mortgages, instalment-buying, financial shoe-string operations, and manipulation of gold.

Congressman Engel estimates that the indebtedness of the railways, utilities, industrials, farm mortgages, etc., is above seventy-three billion. He puts the grand total at 130 billions.

The National Industrial Conference Board estimates that the potential national wealth of the United States is 286 billions. The assessed valuation of that wealth is given by Congressman Engel at 134 billions. This is only four billions more than the 130 billions indebtedness total. These estimates of debt omit billions of short-term and instalment indebtedness, which must be liquidated. (In 1953 it is proposed to raise the national debt to \$300 billion, which exceeds the total potential U. S. wealth.)

Debt-slavery? The interest payable on the total is estimated at more than five billion dollars a year. You and I are paying that now "through the nose." TO WHOM?

Are we solvent? Europe owes us billions of war debts—but they, too, are UNPAYABLE. When merchants are insolvent, what happens? Repudiation. Foreclosure!

The time has come for plain words, short, sharp. We patriots have heretofore been building leadership by putting informative knowledge into open minds.

ONLY financial backing is necessary to restore our great heritage of freedom, stolen from Americans in their sleep of fancied security. Our political Judases have betrayed the people's sovereign power! They work under the double-cross sign of the six-point Solomon star.

Tell these political parasites and subversionists that you will no longer stand for such treason. Make them obey your orders—or GET OUT! You middle class men and women have the power! Use it!

Alien-minded elements have LOADED our judiciary as well as our government administration. Has not the highest tribunal in the land been laid low by the Poison of Liberalism?

"Jews in America constitute a great political force," says N. Y. Editor Margoshes. They are going to use it as they see fit—what are YOU going to DO about it?"

Criminal laziness, toleritis, sucker generosity and limberitis are responsible for our troubles. Put patriotic men in political jobs—and keep them there! Out with "Yellows" as well as "Reds." If you continue to take it lying down, you will get what you deserve—a communistic dictatorship.

No minority can stand against the aroused indignation of Majority Americanism if the sources of that emotion are deep enough to produce militant DEFENSIVE ACTION

Fortune FAVORS the Brave

Audacity! MORE Audacity! ALWAYS Audacity—Makes the enemy jittery!

Americans! BE YOURSELVES!

COURT DISMISSAL FOLLOWS IEWISH BACKDOWN

JEWISH BACKDOWN

(Robert Edward Edmondson, Defendant, reported as below, under date of May 12, 1938)

Without warrant in law, following twelve "relief" motion denials and six trial postponements, the Edmondson-LaGuardia so-called religion libel indictment was unconditionally dismissed in a written opinion May 10, 1938, handed down by Judge James G. Wallace, after a 23-month Jewish juggling of justice in N. Y. City, involving suppression of Free Speech in violation of State and National Constitutions.

The most powerful Kahal in the world—the American Jewish Congress—petitioned the Court April 14, 1938, to dismiss the indictment found by a Jewish majority Grand Jury June 11, 1936, as being "against the public interest:" thereby exposing Jewry as the true prosecution hiding behind the technical title of the Case: "The People of the State of New York versus Robert Edward Edmondson" for alleged group libel of "All Persons of the Jewish Religion."

Upon the application of the JEWISH "friends of the Court," the action was dismissed on the same grounds pleaded by and for and denied to the GENTILE defendant, filed with the Court at the beginning, viz: (1) No crime was committed under the law invoked; (2) There is no group libel statute; (3) "in futherance of justice;" (4) "in the public interest;" (5) in violation of the Freedom of the Press.

It is noteworthy that the District Attorney's brief did not oppose the dismiss-motions of the defense or the Jewish "friends of the Court."

The outcome is more than an individual triumph. It is a World Victory by National Patriotism and Freedom of Speech over International Jewish Communistic Socialism.

Summoned before a Court of Law, the defendant appeared with "clean hands." His conscience clear, he does not fear to face any impartial tribunal with religious, moral or ethical jurisdiction; never having attacked any religion as such in his patriotic publicity campaign.

As a matter of simple justice, Jewish Mayor LaGuardia, who was initially responsible for this judicial crucifixion and received therefor the "American Hebrew Medal," should reimburse the defense for the \$10,000 spent for legal and other defense expenses, which forced the hiding prosecution to back down and make the apologetic exposure confession published. LaGuardia's assertion that the defendant's publications would incite to a breach of the peace, was disposed of by the court declaring that as no violence had occurred during the period covered, none was apparently likely. The truth of the matter is, Jewry didn't dare face damning evidence in a Court of Law.

But the Jewish Socialistic System will HAVE to appear before the Bar of Patriotic Public Opinion.

The defendant will continue his Free Speech educational publicity, NOT against any religion, but against the International Jewish Socialism that is communizing The Republic.

Decision handed down in part below is by Judge Wallace, May 10, 1938:
Recently, when this case appeared on the calendar, motions were made by

American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the Human Relations Committee of the National Council of Women and the American Civil Liberties Union, asking leave to be permitted to intervene as amicus curiae and to file briefs.

In these briefs, the attorneys state their belief that sound public policy, looking to the safeguarding of the rights of free speech, of a free press and of religious liberty, makes it highly desirable that the court, in furtherance of justice, on its own motion, dismiss the indictments against this defendant.

It has been urged that the prevailing rule in England, based on the old case of Rex v. Osborne (1732, 2 Barn, K. B. 1663) supports the theory that a criminal libel can be based upon a defamatory statement concerning such an extensive community. I do not agree with this conclusion.

Putting aside the consideration of the rational basis of criminal prosecution for libel, I am of the opinion that the soundest rule that has been enunciated on the subject of group libel is this: that an indictment cannot be predicated upon defamatory writings assailing a class or group, unless directly, or by implication, some individual is libeled.

There is certainly nothing in the law of this State, nor in any of the cases cited, which justifies a finding that an indictment will lie, based on defamatory matter directed against so extensive and indefinable a group or class as "all persons of the Jewish Religion."

There can be no doubt as to the defamatory nature of the publications mentioned in the instant indictment. They are palpably the outpourings of a fanatical and bigoted mind.

Nevertheless, they (defendant publications) have been circulated for years and have never provoked a breach of the peace in this community, nor, in spite of their virulence, are they apt to.

After a consideration of the briefs submitted by the people, the defendant and amicus curiae, the court, on its own motion, and in the furtherance of justice, dismisses Indictment No. 209220, which charges the defendant with libeling all persons of the Jewish Religion.

(Signed)

JAMES GARRETT WALLACE, Judge of the Court of General Sessions

"MUDDLED THINKING"

Referring to the comment of the Court, that the publications of the defendant " are palpably the outpourings of a fanatical and bigoted mind:" defendant believes that if the Judge knew what the defense knows, he would have omitted such dicta-by-talk of no legal value. The defendant also wonders how can a non-churchman be a religious bigot; and how can an investment-analyst be a fanatic—since fanaticism and the analytical or judicial temperament are incompatible.

Maintaining the "Conspiracy of Silence" policy of The Press by ignoring the real issue of Free Speech, which, as a newspaper, it should champion, the N. Y. Herald-Tribune of May 12, 1938, commented editorially:

'In dismissing three indictments charging criminal libel against Robert Edward Edmondson, Judge James Garrett Wallace wrote an opinion which, because of its clarity and the importance of the issue involved, deserves to be read and re-read as a tonic to the present epidemic of muddled thinking. The pertinent part follows: 'When one realizes how many forms of religion might

consider themselves libeled and seek legal redress, were our laws so extended; and when we reflect on how our courts might, in such event, find themselves forced into the position of arbitets of religious truth, it is apparent that more would be lost than could be gained by attempting to protect the good name of a religion by an appeal to the criminal law."

Now, it may disturb the "muddled thinking" of the Hetald-Tribune to find that the defendant, in principle per se, announces that he is in entire harmony with the quoted paragraph from the Court's "purely by way of dicta"—by-talk of "no legal value"—in its excursion away from jurisdiction of LAW into the field of Morals-Ethics-Religion; but the defendant wonders if such diversion does not violate the fundamental American doctrine as to separation of Church and State, Politics and Religion.

The defendant is supremely confident that time and the logic of events will completely vindicate his response to the Call of Public Duty.

BRIEF OF DEFENDANT, by Defense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr., said: There is no crime of libeling "all persons of the Jewish Religion."

The Court stated that Counsel had not submitted any brief showing it was not a crime to attack any Religious Group. There is no such decision in the United States

THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE ITS POWER TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT IN FURTHERANCE OF JUSTICE.

The Indictment is absurd on its face. The return of it was nothing less than abuse of process by a Grand Jury dominated by a majority of alienminded members as shown by the affidavits submitted on defendant's motion to inspect the minutes.

The District Attorney has conceded that by Clause 1 of Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, no Jew or person connected with any Jew can serve on the Trial Jury. He has said to read the indictment will take four days

Inspection of the alleged libelous documents will show the Court they are the result of study of the literature and Press of the Universe; and as proof of defendant's justifiable motives and honest belief in the truth of his statements he would have the right to occupy the time of this Court and the Jury to read into the record a mass of material without end. There is no telling how many weeks or even months the trial might consume.

AND THERE WOULD BE NO POSSIBILITY OF SECURING A SUSTAINABLE CONVICTION.

The trial would develop racial and religious antagonism that would rock the foundations of this community. The expense of such a trial would be all out of proportion to any possible good to be accomplished.

All the reasons for dismissal in the briefs amicus cutiae are good.

AN APOLOGETIC CONFESSION (Jewry Unmasks Itself as the Real Prosecutor)

After 22 months of trial postponement, the surprise-documents quoted in part hereinafter were submitted to Judge James G. Wallace April 14, 1938, as "friends of the toutt," by the American Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee, American Committee on Religious Rights and Minorities, and the American Civil Liberties Union.

The "Jewishness" of the "American Committee on Religious Rights and Minorities" is shown by these General Committee names: Rabbi S. S. Wise, Henry Morgenthau, Sr., Judge Julian W. Mack, Abram I. Elkus, Arthur Hays Sulzburger; Attorneys Morris Ernst and Arthur Garfield Hays (Haas); National Committeemen B. Charney Vladeck, Rabbi A. H. Silver, A. J. Muste, Joseph Schlossburg, and others.

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

"Prosecutions like this tend to restrict traditional freedom of speech and press. The liberties of expression guaranteed by the Constitution are not limited to any particular field. They include the right to express opinion upon any subject, political, social or religious.

"As Mr. Justice Holmes said in his dissenting opinion in U. S. vs. Schwimmer, 279, U. S. 654, but if there is any principle of the Constitution that more impetatively calls for attachment than any other, it is the principle of free thought—not free thought

for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate."

"The proper remedy for ignorant and misleading doctrines is not suppression but enlightenment. As Mr. Justice Brandeis said in his dissenting opinion in Whitney vs. California, 274 U. S. 357. 377: 'If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."

(Defendant has photostat of a Sept. 18, 1936. letter from the ACLU to Judge N. W.

Rogers of Tompkins Corners, N. Y., saying:

"We have discussed very fully our attitude to the prosecution of Edmondson. We have conferred with his counsel and looked up the law. When the indictment was first brought, it was, in our judgment, clearly a case violative of the Free Speech guarantee, for unlike ordinary criminal libel cases it did not specify persons libeled. The indictment was later changed to specific complainants, and thus the defect was cured." The letter was signed by Roger N. Baldwin, Director, who served a term in a Federal prison as a draft dodger, and whose exclamation "Communism is the goal," is notorious.

Detense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr., wrote Judge Rogers Oct. 1, 1936, saying that Baldwin had not conferred with him, as stated. The religion indictment 209220 was

never changed, as represented)

AN INVOCATION TO TOLERANCE

The Memorandum below was Submitted on Behalf of The American Committee on Religious Rights and Minorities, The American Jewish Committee. The American Jewish Congress, and The Human Relations Committee of The National Council of Women.

These organizations are concerned with the fundamental question, whether the cause of religious liberty and tolerance will be advanced by this particular prosecution, and desire to lay before the court in briefest possible form their views in reference thereto.

(A) There is danger that such use of the criminal libel laws will ultimately react against the very minorities sought to be protected by undermining or abridging the traditional and constitutional right to freedom of speech and of the press. This danger has recently been pointed out by "The Christian Century" which, commenting editorially on the case at bar, stated in its issue of December 1, 1937:

"The number one anti-Semite of America, Mr. Edmondson, is teported as about to be tried for libeling the Jewish religion. * * * It may be said without malice that Mr. Edmondson's statements, especially about the Jewish religion, but also about many persons, have been so intemperate, so devoid of probable foundation and so wildly defamatory that it would be a pleasure to see him punished by any legal means. But it seems doubtful whether a charge of libel against a religion can be sustained, and it is still more doubtful whether it would be to the public interest in the long run for it to be sustained. It is of the utmost importance that there be freedom of discussion and of criticism in religion and in politics."

(B) The statute itself does not by its terms cover group libel, not do any of the reported cases in New York hold that an indictment for criminal libel will lie where the group libelled is as broad as that here defamed.

(C) It is doubtful if a conviction would be in the public interest. Efforts would be made to have it appear that the defendant was a "martyr" to the great cause of civil rights.

In sum, the organizations submitting this memotandum are convinced that the true

libel laws but in a campaign of education.

Section 671 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides: "Court may order indictment to be dismissed. The court may, either of its own motion, or upon the application of the district actorney, and in furtherance of justice, order an action, after indictment to be dismissed. If the Court feels that a termination of this prosecution is "in furtherance of justice," it may upon its own motion dismiss the indictment, with a written statement of its reasons for so doing. Under the statute, such a statement by the Court is filed as a public record, which becomes and remains the official pronouncement of this Court.

JEWRY ADMITS NO LAW WAS VIOLATED

The foregoing documents enter a typical "general denial" of defendant's publication charges, unsupported by any specific refutations—the usual Jewish "reply" to unanswerable accusations. But it will be noted that it confesses that the defendant DID NOT VIOLATE ANY LAW.

From the beginning the defense contended that the indictment was without warrant in law since no offense was shown. Does it make a difference "whose ox is being gored?"

It is interesting to note that most of the legal authorities quoted by the persecution in this case were cited by the defense in previously denied "relief" motions, totalling 12 in all.

The brief completely ignores and fails to reply to the defendant's unanswerable accusation of Communistic Jewish Anti-Americanism—which REAL issue therefore still stands unchallenged.

Their own RUTHLESS INTOLERANCE having been uncovered, they now shamelessly pose a hypocritical role of "holicr than thou."

Does this panicky move to have the indictment nullified imply that the so-called Jewish religion cannot endure the Searchlight of Truth? Jewry created an unprecedented opportunity to defend Judaism—but sidestepped at the appointed hour.

The briefs properly advocate a campaign of EDUCATION in place of court action. "The Edmondson movement has been primarily and essentially a campaign of enlightenment to fortify leaders with fact and authority" declared the defendant in Indictment Bulletin 26 of April 1, 1936.

In fine, the verdict of the American Jewish CONGRESS is tantamount to a legalistic repudiation of the indictment brought by the Jewish-Majority Grand Jury—suggestive of liability under U. S. Criminal Code Sections 19 and 43.

The JEW "apologizes" this time—not the White Man! It is a "run to cover!"

CHRISTIAN CENTURY ATTACKS JEWISH RELIGION

The Christian Century, which is quoted in the above memorandum as denouncing the defendant Dec. 1, 1937, itself nevertheless printed on June 9, 1937, the following "theological" attack on the so-called Jewish Religion AS SUCH:

"Judaism rests upon an IMPOSSIBLE BASIS. It tries to pluck the fruits of democracy WITHOUT YIELDING ITSELF to the processes of democracy. Democracy cannot guarantee our Jewish brethren against the emergency of A CRISIS in which prejudice and anger generated by THEIR LONG RESIST-ANCE to the democratic processes, may flame up to their great hurt. The situation in which the Jewish Problem rises is in large measure of JEWRY'S OWN CREATION. The root cause is the Jew's immemorial and pertinacious OB-SESSION WITH AN ILLUSION that his race and people are the object of the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of their racial integrity and separateness. Their idea of an integral race HAS ITS PROTOTYPE IN NAZISM."

The parallel is deadly!

Notwithstanding Jewish and duped Christian misrepresentation thereof, the defendant's patriotic politico-economic exposures were directed, without hate, to defend-protect-preserve the peace and safety of the constitutional state SPECIFICALLY against irreligious Jewish-Communist subversions thereof.

Until the publisher was indicted, he gave little publicity-attention to Jewish Talmudic doctrine; but in order thereafter to prepare his defense, he investigated and published his documentary findings.

In this great battle, TWO MEN—Editor Edmondson and Lawyer Wise—ARMED WITH THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH, have beaten down wealthy World Jewry on its own materialistic ground.

Since EVERY ONE of the many "relief motions" made by the defendant during 22 months delay were UNIFORMLY denied, this retreat was forced, NOT in a Court of Law, but by "The Great Power of The Press" through Defense Pamphlets dramatically exposing the LAW WEAKNESS of the prosecution.

BACKDOWN BETTER THAN TRIAL

Upon receiving defendant's message that the Court had officially dismissed all indictments, Adrien Arcand of Montreal, Leader of the National Unity Party, head of the Canadian patriotic movement, and highest authority in North America on the Jewish Problem, immediately wrote as follows:

"The backdown on your case is the first real great defeat of the World Kehilla. They refused to carry on, on the very ground they themselves chose. It never happened before anywhere. It is an admission of defeat, jitters and incapacity GREATER THAN ANY COURT JUDGMENT COULD HAVE BROUGHT, for they have done the judging themselves, on law as well as on facts. Nothing can erase the outstanding document brought forth by their most powerful organizations.

"What a Victory! What a Victory! Bigger and more significant than any previous in the history of the legal Jewish question.

"One thing to be pointed out is: American Justice (?) REFUSED TO JUDGE YOUR CASE ON ITS MERITS. It judged according to the pleas of a third party. And the Court granted to a third party a demand it has refused to grant to the defendant. I have never met with such an instance in any case.

"You emerge victor with a spotless sword from one of the greatest fights ever waged—that of an international super-wealthy and powerful combine against, a single man with truth and moral courage. If the Jews had had even a shadow of right or truth, they could have won. And if thousands of cowering and timid 'anti-Jews' had been in the place of Edmondson, they would have given in long ago. I hope your triumph will awaken them. There is hope, in your country, as long as there will be ONE man of your type.

"I PREFER THE ISSUE AS IT CAME. A trial would cost 'unfindable' money, and with whatever result, could not have brought such a stirring result."

The defendant is speechless before such praise from so high an authority.

A ROLL OF HONOR

In this hour of triumph the defendant pays tribute to courageous patriots named below, at home and abroad, who faithfully stood up publicly beside him, an instrument:

Marian Louise Edmondson, wife of the defendant; John S. Wise, Jr., of New York City, Defense Counsel; Captain Henry Hamilton Beamish of England, World Dean of this Liberation Movement; Adrien Arcand of Canada, head of the National Unity Party; Col. U. Fleischhauer, famous Protocol Expert; William Kullgren of the "Beacon Light," Atascadero, Calif.; A. N. Field of New Zealand, author of "All These Things;" James True, Washington Publisher of Weekly Industrial Reports; super-patriot Editor Arnold S. Leese, of

England; Editor McDermott of the London "Patriot;" Editor Gerald B. Winrod of "The Defender" of Kansas; George L. Pafort of N. Y. City, who served subpoenas on the "Princes of Jewry" in the Edmondson Case.

In grateful acknowledgement, the defendant raises his hand in Silent Salute to that noble and faithful band of known and unknown women and men whose financial and other substantial contributions helped to bear the heavy sacrificial burden of this grueling battle in the Courts of the Law and before the Bar of Public Opinion.

To the TEN MILLION Americans who, through the Edmondson Publicity Crusade, have learned THE CAUSE of the Communizing activities which have been wrecking The Republic, the defendant extends patriotic felicitations, directing attention to the fact that the Edmondson triumph has blazed the Trail for militant patriots of the Nation, who need no longer fear prison for patriotically employing Free Speech, Free Press and Free Assembly, so long as they concentrate on the subversive SYSTEM. (The court established a legal "group libel" precedent in American jurisprudence.)

As a Fellow-Vigilante, the defendant hails the Patriotic Vigilantes of America, and calls upon them to "Rescue The Republic." To them he declares that this is not a mere Edmondson victory; but a COMPLETE VINDICATION of the thesis that our great constitutional form of government STANDS OR FALLS with Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly; that Treason to Free Speech is TREASON TO THE STATE.

ON WITH THE FIGHT FOR RIGHT!

NOT AN AMERICAN BUT A IEW!

"I AM NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN of Jewish Faith! I AM A JEW! I have been a Jew for 4000 years! Hitler was RIGHT—WE ARE A PEOPLE! The object of the AMERICAN Jewish Congress is to defend JEWISH rights at home AND ABROAD, of ALL JEWS—and to defend American DEM-OCRACY!"—Rabbi Stephen S. Wise (Weisz), N. Y. Times 6-13-38.

The following is from June 15, 1938, Bulletin:

You will observe from the quotation that this Austrian-born rabbi, one of the most important Jews in America, in an astonishing Declaration of Principles, declares Jews are "A People;" and implies that, as such, they come BEFORE AMERICANISM.

"I am a Jew first, then a Democrat"—Jewish Aldermanic President

You will also observe that ALL Jews—good AND bad everywhere—are to be protected by The AMERICAN Jewish Congress, under the Rabbi Code. Nothing is said about Citizenship DUTIES to the U. S. (or elementary Justice.)

THE COMMUNIST PARTY ALSO ANNOUNCES ITS SUPPORT OF DEMOCRACY, O.E.D.: "Communism is IEWISH!"

Americanism is a single organism. Those who refuse to be absorbed or assimilated into it are ALIEN, and MUST BE REJECTED as poison.

Jewish anti-Americanism certainly makes Jews unfit for American citizenship; and when their most prominent and leading rabbi publicly admits that he is a Jew BEFORE HE IS AN AMERICAN, WHY SHOULD ANY JEW NOW HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE WITH JURISDICTION OF LIFE AND DEATH OVER GENTILES?

The solution of the Jewish Problem is: Disfranchisement and Deportation to Madagascar. This can be done by U. S. Constitutional Amendment on the ground that Jewish Anti-Americanism constitutes a danger to the "peace and safety of the state."

ADDENDA

Former President Theodore Roosevelt, addressing the American Defense Society January 5, 1919: "We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith, becomes an American AND ASSIMILATES HIMSELF TO US, he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else; for it is an outrage to discriminate against ANY SUCH MAN because of creed, birth-place or origin. BUT, THIS IS PREDICATED UPON THE MAN BECOMING IN VERY FACT AN AMERICAN AND NOTHING BUT AN AMERICAN. If he tries to KEEP SEGREGATED WITH MEN OF HIS OWN ORIGIN and separated from the rest of America, then HE ISN'T DOING HIS PART AS AN AMERICAN. There can be no DIVIDED ALLEGIANCE here. * * * We have room for but one flag, and this excludes the RED FLAG, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization. We intend to see that the crucible turns our people out AS AMERICANS of American NATIONALITY."

"The Jew remains a Jew-Assimilation is impossible"-Ludwig Lewisohn, Jewish author of "Israel," 1926.

N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosenman, "Roosevelt's Right Arm," "Sharply attacked assimilationist plans" at the Council of Jewish Federations in Philadelphia—N Y. Times of Feb. 1, 1936.

The following is from a speech delivered by Eric H. Louw, Feb. 24, 1939, in the South African House of Assembly, on the "Alien & Immigration" bill:

"I find in 'The Book Of Jewish Thoughts' by Dr. J. H. Hertz, Chief Rabbi of England, this statement: 'What I understand by assimilation is loss of identity. It is the kind of assimilation I dread most, even more than pogroms.' (Pogroms kill but few Jews—assimilation would be mass "Genocide.")

"Basil M. Henriques, a Distinguished Jew, made a speech in London reported in the Zionist Record of South Africa, Jan. 29, 1939, saying: There must be no assimilation. We are a peculiar people, and a peculiar people we must remain."

RABBI THANKED - AND WARNED

Open Letter of August 1, 1938 to Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor Brooklyn Jewish Examiner.

"Many thanks, Rabbi, for the free publicity you gave me in your weekly of July 22, 1938, in three-column front-page article, containing a picture that looks like me about as much as you do. It is all the more appreciated because the American Hebrew announced sometime ago it would not even mention me anymore. Evidently, it dosen't believe in Free Speech for all citizens.

Another sequence that deserves special notice is that in one of your last year's issues you put me in what you called your 'Rogues' Gallery.' Now, apparently I have been honored by promotion. Is this action in recognition of the unconditional dismissal May 10, 1938, of the Jewish court charge against me of libeling "All persons of the Jewish Religion," because I publicly exposed Communism as Jewish in origin and direction; the throwing out of the case being on the ground that I was merely exercising my American Right of Free Press—just as you are doing in foolishly trying to make me a Hitlerite;

whereas, instead of being a German Nazi PATRIOT, or an Italian Fascist PATRIOT, or a Japanese Nationalist PATRIOT? I am a militant American Vigilante Patriot defending my country against Jewish Internationalism.

But I suggest, Rabbi, that you watch your publication steps. In exercising Free Speech, libel guilt surely lies in misrepresentation. Your article of July 22 quotes the court thus: "It is necessary to bear with the fanatical ravings of SUCH SCOUNDRELS AS EDMONDSON because the greater principles of Free Speech and Free Press are involved."

"I have before me the judge's decision. I challenge you to produce such a quotation therefrom. The court carefully avoided calling the defendant a "scoundrel"—which the dictionaries define as "knave, swindler, villain." Can you legally sustain such an allegation, Rabbi?

Further, "The Examiner's" article says my activities have brought me into "contact with the law on more than one occasion." Just what law? The Jewish Code—or American Code? Careful, Rabbi!

But I feel kindly toward your "Examiner," for my patriotic crusade against Jewish Anti-Americanism received some of its high-explosive ammunition from it, notably in the issue of Oct. 20, 1933, wherein you said that the "Roosevelt Administration has appointed more Jews to office than any other in American History," naming Bernard M. Baruch as "Unofficial President." Although when I showed that article to President David Brown of the American Hebrew in 1934, in support of my exposure-campaign, he snorted: "They don't know what they're talking about. We'll put 'em out of business;" but you're still on the job.

Now, while I am not a churchman and cannot truthfully be branded a religious bigot, it seems to me suggestively sinister to find Rabbis—who pose among the Christian Clergy as "Men of God"—engaged in a racket such as spreading reprehensible matter of the evil character I have outlined. Perhaps the answer is to be found in John 8:44, which has caused European students of the Jewish Problem to conclude that "Christ was the greatest 'Anti-Semite' of all time"

It is confessed in your article: "Anti-Semitic propaganda in the U. S. today is MORE WIDE-SPREAD AND POWERFUL THAN IT WAS IN GERMANY AT THE TIME OF HITLER'S ADVENT TO POWER. Today American Jewry DARE NOT overlook this."

That is substantially correct, Rabbi, except you should substitute "Anti-Iewish" for "Anti-Semite."

BE WARY, AMERICANS!

(From Edmondson bulletin of Sept. 1, 1938)

FELLOW-PATRIOTS

Americanism is neither Nationalism, nor Democracy nor Communism. While Patriotism is the basis on which rest Americanism, Fascism, Nazism, Nationalism, its practical application differs in the U.S.

True Americanism is Patriotic Individualism. It is for personal progress first. The supreme objective of Americanism is the good of the individual first, through ordered liberty. The supreme objective of the Socialist-Communist-Paternalist Philosophies is the good of the state first, through regimentation of the individual.

The United States of America are not a nation like those of Europe. They are A UNION federated for common State welfare and protection against

external enemies. This federation is not a nation otherwise. It is unique in the history of the world. The 48 states retain THE MAJORITY of their soverign or "national" rights. They delegated to Washington only 18 specific "national" powers.

AMERICANISM HAS A DUAL ALLEGIANCE—First, To The State; Second, to the Washington "National" Government. Citizens of other countries

have a SINGLE allegiance—to a Central Authority.

The checks and balances of the American Political system were designed to defeat communistic subversions, as well as those of plutocratic enemies of the Republic. States Rights are essentially MAJORITY RIGHTS since only a limited number of national powers were delegated to the central sub-national (not super-national) government at Washington. Such retained majority rights constitute a safeguard against usurpation by a powerful minority, for a highly centralized government is easily subverted by such an element. Not so 48 sovereign states acting independently in self-preservation. When the central national government is subverted by faithless political servants, as at present, then state citizens automatically become virtual militia — Vigilantes — armed with sovereign rights and power recalled and reassumed.

Hence, ultimate power resides in the American Home; for Washington is merely a sub-agency without nationalistic jurisdiction except as to certain carefully indicated and restricted powers. It has no other authority over the

INDIVIDUAL STATES.

The attempt of the Roosevelt Regime to transfer supreme power from the Sovereign States to Washington was designed to destroy the American System of ordered INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY by subjugating it to a highly centralized SUPER-NATIONALISM, easily undermined by an organized minority. New Deal legislation is directed toward breaking down the majority rights retained by the States.

Americans want no MASTER-Leadership because such dictatorship destroys their Individual Initiative, their personality, their self-reliance, liberties, equal opportunities, freedom of action and progress as a people. But uninformed American Individualism is still unorganized in the greatest crisis in its history. The Fetish of Tolerance has lulled vigilance into fancied security. Aroused, the Spirit of Thought moves far more rapidly than Physical Materalism. It took Communists more than 25 years to get headway. With proper enlightenment, American Individualism can be in concerted action "over night."

The SOUL of Americanism faces crucifixion. On its rebirth hangs the fate of The Union. For Individualism, the preservation of Americanism is

worth ANY sacrifice.

BE WARY, AMERICANS! And when invoking Militant Patriotism to fight Communism and its allies, be vigilant not to fall in the Hidden Pit of a false Super-Nationalism whose Paternalistic Co-operative "Social Justice" End-Product is ALSO REGIMENTATION, the deadly foe of Americanism.

ZIONISTS DISLOYAL TO IL 52

The following is from a Sept. 7, 1938, Edmondson publication:

"Speaking as an American, I cannot for a moment concede that one can be AT THE SAME TIME A TRUE AMERICAN AND AN HONEST ADHERENT OF THE ZIONIST MOVEMENT

"They who believe in and hope and labor for an ultimate restoration of Jewish Political life, and the re-establishment of a Jewish NATION, place A PRIOR LIEN upon their citizenship which * * * WOULD PREVENT THEM FROM MAINTAINING ALLEGIANCE TO THE COUNTRY OF WHICH THEY NOW CLAIM TO BE GOOD CITIZENS."

The foregoing confession appeared in the N. Y. Sun of Sept. 4, 1907, in a communication from Isadore Singer, quoting a letter from the late Jacob H. Schiff, of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., dated Aug. 8, 1907, addressed to Prof. Solomon Schechter, President of the Jewish Theological Seminary, relative to the settlement of the Jews in Palestine under the Political Zionist Ideal.

Zionism is Jewish Nationalism' — Rabbi S. S. Wise, Jewish Sentinel of Chicago, Sept. 29, 1933.

Judge Julian Mack, in his Presidential address to the 1919 Zionist Convention, declared: "Beyond all question, to put it mildly, NINE-TENTHS of the Jews of America are Zionists."

The foregoing is on Page 57 of "Modern Palestine," a book by Jessie E. Sampter, a Jewess author. Julian W. Mack is a prominent N. Y. jurist.

On Page 53, same book, appears: "Jews are a distinct nationality, of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, or shade of belief, is necessarily a member."—U. S. Supreme Court Justice L. D. Brandeis.

"We Jews in the House of Commons, whatever our political opinions may be, will always stand in that assembly for the rights of the Jewish Community." (Emanuel Shinwell, Jan. 23, 1929, vide the London "Patriot" July 18, 1929).

"Jews who settle in Palestine become citizens of this Jewish Commonwealth. But a scheme has now been put into effect whereby any Jew who is interested in the rebuilding of this Jewish Homeland may be registered as a citizen thereof. In Jerusalem is kept a 'Book of Remembrance,' in which is written the name and address of every Jew who contributes \$100 or more to the Jewish National Fund. All whose names appear in this book are automatically made citizens of the Jewish Homeland."

The foregoing is from "Zionism in Prophecy," 1936, Dawn Publishers, Brooklyn, N. Y.

1940 ADDENDA

"Dependable sources report that Zionist International headquarters are in process of removing from London to Washington. The B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation League, with its set-up perfected in practically every city of the U. S., will work in closest harmony with the transplanted group. It is understood that the League's cash fund of more than \$30,000,000 at the first of January, is substantially larger at the present time. With more than 14,000 individual case records perfectly cross-indexed and co-ordinated, those who direct the League are in possession of tremendous power. There is wide expectation that this power will be felt in connection of the 1940 Presidential election."—From the Daily News of Amarillo, Texas, Aug. 31, 1940.

MOVIES A JEW MONOPOLY (Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 14, 1938)

By thinking, earnest and fair-minded American patriots, deeply concerned over the jazzy-communistic eye-and-ear "education" American Youth is receiving via the "movies," we are repeatedly asked this vital question:

"IS the motion picture industry really lewish-controlled?

The straightest answer to that query is: "Let's look at the record!" We believe quotations from it, as below, will support the estimate that over 95% of the business is Jewishowned and operated. Jews themselves supply figures which confirm it—so let us examine an analysis of the industry published in the Sept. 22, 1938, issue of The Chicago Jewish Sentinel, as follows:

"The film industry is one that employs thousands of Jews, shows no discrimination against Jewish labor, and ABSORBS ITS SHARE — AND MORE — OF JEWISH REFLIGEES."

The publication then proceeds to list as Jew stars in the film world: Paul Muni, Eddie Cantor, Edward G. Robinson, Luise Rainer, Edward Arnold, Joseph Schildkraut, Joseph Brombert, Tony Martin (Weiss), Jack Benny, Ben Blue, Jules Garfield, Ethel Merman, Eleanor Whitney.

Among the producers, writers and others are mentioned Max Reinhardt, Sol Lesser, Sam Briskin, Louis B. Mayer, George Bilson, Hunt Stromberg, Jerry Hoffman, Sidney Lanfield, Ben Bernie, Maurice Conn, Ben Kahane, Lew Seiler, Sam G. Engel, Lee Schulman, David O. Selznick, Clifford Odets, Paul Yawitz, Vincent Sherman, Lee Katz, Walter Winchell, Paltiel Buchner, Hunt Brand.

OFFICIAL FINANCIAL RECORDS

Now, let us examine the statistical publications, especially Moody's Manual, for 1938. In this we find the officers and directors of the important corporations in the motion picture business as listed below:

LOEWS, INC.: David Bernstein, J. R. Rubin, N. M. Schenck, Isador Frey, Leopold Friedman, C. C. Moscowitz, Arthur W. Loew, A. L. Lichtmann, E. J. Mannix, Sam Katz, E. A. Schuler, Leo Cohen, N. Nayfack, R. Lazarus, B. Thau. WARNER BROS. PICTURES: H. M. Warner, Albert Warner, J. L. Warner, E. K. Hessberg, C. S. Guggenheimer, Herman Starr, Morris Wolf, S. P. Friedman, S. E. Morris, Joseph Bernhard. UNITED ARTISTS THEATER CIRCUIT: J. M. Schenck, Lee Schubert, B. S. Nayfack, A. H. Frisch, J. H. Moscowitz. PARAMOUNT PICTURES: Adolf Zukor, Y. F. Freeman, Fred Mohrhardt, J. H. Karp, Fred Myers, J. D. Hertz. RADIO-KEITH-ORPHEUM: Lee Spitz, David Sarnoff, Morris Goodman, Fredk. Straus. METROPOLITAN PLAY-HOUSES: J. M. Schenck, L. B. Soper, Lee Spitz, M. C. Weizman, M. A. Albert. COL-UMBIA PICTURES: Harry Cohn, Jack Cohn, L. M. Blancke, Sol. Bornstein, Jack Koerner, Charles Schwartz. GONSOLIDATED FILM INDUSTRIES: J. Waller, J. W. Altschuler, M. J. Siegel, R. I. Poucher, E. H. Seifert, N. K. Loder.

Following is a "Hollywood Record" printed in the "Liberation Magazine" of Aug. 14, 1938, giving "principal Jews in the business":

Jack Benny (real name Kubelsky), Bert Lahr (Larrheim), Charlie Chaplin (Ronstein), George Burns (Birnbaum), Jack Bernie (Ancelowitsch), Fanny Brice (Borach), Elaine Barrie (Jacobs), Bobby Breen (Borsack), Eddie Cantor (Iskowitz), Ina Claire (Fagan), Ricardo Cortez (Kranz), Patricia Ellis (Leftwich), Douglas Fairbanks (Ullman), Paulette Goddard (Levy), Al Jolson (Yoelsen), Sybil Jason (Jacobs), Geo. Jessel, Sam Jaffee, Ted Lewis (Friedman), Myer Livingston (Marx), Paul Muni (Weisenfreund), Ethel Merman (Zimmerman), Parkyakarkas (Eistein), Marion Marsh, Four Marx Brothers, Three Ritz Brothers, Joe Penner (Pintriern), Irving Pichel, Edward G. Robinson (Goldenberg), Gregory Ratoff, Harry Richman, Francis Lederer, Jack Berle, Florence Reed, Sylvia Sidney (Jason), Maurice Schwartz, David Warfield, Carmel Myers, Jackie Coogan (Cohn), Igor Gorin, Sophie Tucker, Jos. Schildkraut. Norma Talmage (Mrs. Geo. Jessel), Lionel Stander, Ed Wynn (Leopold), Waiter Winchell, Luise Rainer, Milton Berle, Irving Berlin (Baline), Sally Eilers. J. Edward Brombert.

All the foregoing lists are very incomplete, Space prevents full coverage.

CLERGYMAN REPORTS JEW MONOPOLY

The very important points below are taken from "The Movie Barons and Sunday Movies," by Rev. R. H. Martin, President of the National Reform Assn.:

"The motion picture industry is said to be the fifth largest industry in the U. S., with a capital of over two billion dollars. There are three divisions—producers, distributors, exhibitors. Most of the producing companies are members of "The Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America, Inc." There are 25 or more companies in this organization, which produces from 90 to 95 per cent of all the pictures in this country. A half dozen of the largest of these control the organization, and it in turn dominates practically the entire motion picture business. Probably no great industry in America is so completely dominated by a few men of wealth as the motion picture industry.

"Investigation shows that the movie barons during the depression period were receiving immense salaries and bonuses while their companies were heading toward receivership and bankruptcy, or sustaining immense losses. Paramount-Publix is one of the largest production companies. In 1933, when Paramount was in bankruptcy, Gerard SWOPE, President received \$72,308. In 1929 President Adolf ZUKOR received \$130,000 in salary and \$757,500 bonus. Film executive salaries "revealed to the U. S. Senate" (1933) are listed: David Loew \$521,000. Irving Thalberg \$135,200, Arthur Loew \$311,000, Emanuel Cohen \$173,000, Harry Cohen \$145,600, Carl Laemmle \$156,000, Louis B. Mayer \$84,500, Reports read at the meeting at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Dec. 11,

1934, showed Nicholas M. Schenck received \$219,000 in salary and bonus, David Bernstein \$149,700. Vice-Prest. Jesse L. Lasky received in 1929 in salary and bonus \$881,500 from Paramount.

"The Fox Film Corp. was one of the largest production companies which also went extensively into the exhibitor field. It went into bankruptcy in 1930 and came out in 1935, and is now the Twentieth Century-Fox Co. Sidney R. Kent is now President of Fox and under a seven year contract is guaranteed a minimum salary of \$180,000 with a possible maximum of almost \$300,000 per year, plus \$200.00 per week for entertainment. Under the same seven year contract, Joseph M. Schenck, Chairman of the Board, is to receive \$130,000 per year.

"The figures on salaries and bonuses are taken from the report to the U. S. Senate by the Federal Trade Commission.

"The same group of men, who have taken millions of dollars out of the American Public through their manipulations of the motion picture business, are still in control. THE BIG MAJORITY OF THE BARONS WHO CONTROL THIS INDUSTRY, ARE JEWS. From reliable sources we have learned that above 90% of the big barons of the industry are Jews—in fact, they themselves claim 95%, and boast of it."

BENJ. FRANKLIN WAS ANTI-JEWISH

(Nov. 15, 1938, Edmondson Publication)

During the past few years, there has been no single piece of publicity which has "got the Jewish goat" more than the alleged anti-Jewish "prophecy" of Benjamin Franklin, America's great statesman, reported as having been made at the 1789 U. S. Constitutional Convention.

This "prophecy was first published in the U. S. by "Liberation" Magazine of Feb. 3, 1934. It went to Europe and was widely circulated by militant patriots. Reference was made to such circulation by the N. Y. Jewish Daily Bulletin of Sept. 20, 1934. The undersigned received many inquiries as to the content of said prophecy. He investigated and found that the late Madison Grant, author of "The Conquest of a Continent" (boycotted by Jews), had in his possession a report that Charles Pinckney's diary of the U. S. Constitutional Convention of 1789 contained Franklin's words as quoted herein; but up to that time Grant had not been able to find the record, for which a search was still going on. Thereupon, the undersigned, on Sept. 25, 1934, to meet a general demand for information, published the document AS CIRCULATING NEWS.

"Franklin's Prophecy" has interjected itself into the newspapers frequently since then, always being referred to as a forgery, without any explanation as to what had been forged. A forgery, in dictionary definition, is a counterfeit of something. The same forgery-criticism may be extended to another "prophecy"—The "Protocols of The Elders of Zion," denounced by Jews as a forgery—of what? And the resemblance goes further, for the predictions of both are being carried into effect today by Roosevelt Jews in the U. S. The comment upon this is that the acid test of the genuineness of prophecy lies in the fulfillment.

Jewish publications assert that Franklin was a friend of the Jews because he once made a \$25.00 "contribution," together with other Gentile churchfolk, for the building of a synagogue; BUT FRANKLIN WAS DEFINITELY ANTI-JEWISH according to his own writings. In the N. Y. Public Library will be found books containing "Benjamin Franklin's Writings" by Smythe. Vol. 8, quotes a letter from Franklin to President John Adams, dated Passy, France, Nov. 26, 1781, prior to the Constitutional Convention, as below:

"I think that keeping us out of the possession of fifty thousands pounds sterling worth of goods for securing the payment of a demand for damages is

not ony dishonorable treatment but a monstrous injustice. It seems to me that it is principally with John Neufville of Amsterdam, Holland, we have to do; and although I believe him to be as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem, I did not expect that, with so many and such constant professions of friendship for the U. S. with which he loads all his letters, he would attempt to enforce his demands by a proceeding so abominable. His proposition of terms on which he would borrow money for us stamped his character on my mind with an impression to deep that it is not yet effaced."

In the same volume there is another letter to President Adams dated, Passy, France, Dec. 14, 1781, from which this is extracted:

"I was led to understand that it would be agreeable to these gentlemen (J. Neulville & Son), if, in acknowledgement of their zeal for our cause, and great services in securing this loan, they could be made by some law of Congress the general consignee of America to receive and sell upon commission in the different ports of the nations, all the produce of America that should be sent by our merchants to Europe. I remark upon the extravagance and impossibility of this proposition. By this time, I fancy your Excellency is satisfied in supposing J. de Neufville was as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem—since Jacob was not content with his percents but took the whole of his brother's, Esau's, birthright AND HIS POSTERITY DID THE SAME BY THE CANAANITES AND CUT THEIR THROATS IN THE BARGAIN—which I do not think Neufville has the least inclination to do by us while he can GET anything by our being alive."

Smythe's Writings are pronounced genuine in the following report: Editor Wesley Winans Stout of the Saturday Evening Post wrote May 16, 1939, to Dr. J. E. Conner, 1121 Bedford Ave., Brooklyn, N. Y., that: "Carl Van Doren is the greatest living authority on Benj. Franklin. I quote him: It is true that Franklin had difficulties with Jean de Neufville & Son, a firm of Dutch bankers who made a tentative loan to Congress, negotiated by William Lee, and demanded an extravagant security."

Below is more evidence from the record. Read the following Pennsylvania Constitution's anti-Jew oath required of citizens at the time the great philosopher was alive, and ask yourself if any Jew could honestly sign it:

PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTI-JEW OATH

"I______, do profess faith in God The Father and in Jesus Christ His Eternal Son, the True God, and in the Holy Spirit one God blessed evermore, and do acknowledge the sacred Scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by Divine Inspiration."

The following is from "The Republic Reclaimed" by Chicago Lawyer Newton Jenkins:

"It is very significant that the Chairman of the Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention (1776) which wrote into the Constitution this provision against the Jews was none other than Benjamin Franklin. The great predominance of Quakers in Pennsylvania brought the matter to a head when, in 1790, four months after Franklin's death, the test clause, at it was called, was eliminated from the Constitution of Pennsylvania."

It is noteworthy that persons with Jewish names have been in charge of Franklin records. William GUGGENHEIM has been head of the Benjamin

Franklin Society. Max FERRAND is understood to have supervised Franklin records for the Huntington Library at Pasadena, Calif. A collector of Franklin records called "Stone", is said to spell the name "Stein." He announced some months ago in the newspapers that he was disposing of same to the Franklin Institute at Philadelphia.

Poultney Bigelow, of Malden-on-Hudson, who has world-wide fame as a man of letters and American author and journalist, writes the undersigned: "Voltaire, FRANKLIN and Frederick The Great, were the three outstanding champions of political and religious liberty in the most humanitarian period of the world. All three were friends, AND ALL THOUGHT ALIKE IN THE MATTER OF THE JEWS. All three advocated tolerance, the right of residence and police protection for Jews in their traditional pursuit of pawnbroking and money-lending. But not one ever dreamed of them claiming citizenship, much less an office WHERE THEY MIGHT RULE OVER WHITE MEN."

(Upon asking permission to quote him, Mr. Bigelow, with high patriotism, replied: "Anything from this pen which you think useful to our common country and the cause of historic truth, is at your service. The Jew is a fact of historic importance. We examine such facts with an open mind." He wrote from Paris 2-7-37: "Paris is now almost as Yiddish as Manhattan or London. It is an International Plague that calls for SURGICAL TREATMENT.")

Let us analyze, point by point, the alleged Franklin Prophecy, placing Prophecy in one column and Fulfillment opposite thereto, in a parallel comparison, as below. Then digest the deadly significance.

"FRANKLIN PROPHECY"

In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone and depreciated its economic integrity;

• Segregated themselves, and have not assimilated;
• (3) Have tried to undermine the Christian Religion;

FULFILLMENTS

• (1) "From reliable sources we have learned that above 90% of the big barons of the Movie Industry are Jews. The current run of motion pictures has been injurious to public morals."—From "The Movie Baron and Sunday Movies" by Rev. R. H. Martin, President National Reform Assn. The author of "The Republic Reclaimed" says: "Jews control the slate-makers in all factions and in all parties. We find evidence of debasing Jewish Influence on every hand in the U. S. today."
• (2) Ludwig Lewisohn, prominent Jewish author of "Israel," says: "A Jew remains a Jew. Assimilation is impossible." Prof. Albert Einstein was quoted in Collier's Weekly (11-26-38) as declaring: "A Jew who abandons his faith remains a Jew." N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosenman has spoken publicly against it. (N. Y. Times 2-1-36).
• (3) Maurice Samuel, Zionist Author, in "You Gentiles," exclaims: "We Jews are destroyers—and will remain destroyers forever. Nothing you can do will meet our demands. The unassimilated Jew is dangerous to you. Ours is one life—yours another. They are opposed in mortal enmity." Jewish Author Bernard Lazare in "Anti-Semitism," says: "The Jew works at his age-old task—the annihilation of the religion of Christ." The London Jewish World of Mar. 15, 1923, stated: "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian."

(4) Have built up a State within a state;

• When opposed, have tried to strangle that country to death financially;

• (6) Did the world give Palestine to the Jews, they would find some cogent reason for not returning:

• (7) They are vampires; they cannot live among themselves only; they must subsist on people not of their race;

  • (8) They will dominate the land;

• (9) They will change our form of government;

• (10) If we do not exclude them then, in 200 years our children will be working in the fields, and Jews will be in the counting houses, rubbing their hands.

• (4) "Let us recognize that we Jews are a distinct nationality." U. S. Supreme Court Former Justice L. D. Brandeis. in "The Jewish Problem and How to Solve it." "I cannot for a moment concede that, at the same time one can be a true American and an honest adherent of the Zionist (political) movement," Jacob Schiff, in letter Aug. 8, 1907.

• (5) Promoters of the International Jewish Boycott against Hitler-Germany for expelling Jewish Communists, boast that they have pushed that country to the verge of financial bankruptcy. The boycott has been extended to Italy and Japan.

• (6) In his book "From Pharaoh to Hitler" Jewish Lawyer-Bernard J. Brown says: "The most ardent Jewish Nationalists (Political Zionists) do not intend to live in Palestine even if a Homeland were established there." The Dead Sea mineral wealth, estimated at many billions of dollars, has attracted Jew capital to Palestine.

• (7) The anti-Communist Canadian pamphlet "Key to the Mystery" quotes the following Jewish boast published in the Belingske Tidende of Dec. 9, 1935; "Who does not know what the glands in the human body represent? The Jews have settled upon the glands of the nations. These glands are the exchanges, banks, daily papers, insurance companies."

• (8) Roosevelt's Key Jews control Washington, the Political Power Center of the Nation, and N. Y. City, its Economic Dynamo. See Roosevelt's Supreme Jewish Council, including "Economic Master Mind" Bernard M. Baruch; "Legal Master Mind" Felix Frankfurter; "New Deal Father" Former Supreme Court Justice L. D. Brandeis; and U. S. Treasury Dictator Morgenthau.

• (9) "We challenge the American System; we demand a thoroughly Socialized Democracy; we support an enlarged Supreme Court."—Central Conference of American Rabbis' proclamations published in the Jewish-owned N. Y. Times. Sept. 13, 1936. The U.S. A. is A Republic. Webster's Dictionary calls "Social Democracy" Communism.

• (10) Are U. S. Jews in the "counting houses rubbing their hands" over their Kentucky Gold Pile, concentrated in America and wrecking European credit.

ADDENDA

DESCENDANT OF PRESIDENT JOHN ADAMS WARNS OF JEWISH MENACE

The following extracts are taken from "Henry Adams and his Friends," 1947, by Harold Dean Cater, published by Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Mass.—Henry Adams is a descendant of John Adams, signer of the American Declaration of Independence and President of The Republic, elected in 1796:

"... The Jew Question is really the most serious of our problems. ... The Kaffir Circus is the most startling phenomenon since the South Sea Scheme. It is almost wholly in Jew hands. Beit is building a palace in Park Lane. Barnato has rented Spencer House.

The Christians are furious. They talk of making a new ghetto. They secretly encourage the anti-Semite movement." (Letter to John Hay from London, Oct. 4, 1895, from Henry Adams) (Page 350).

"Did you enjoy, as I did, that list of Jew names tailed after J. P. Morgan, in the foreign exchange syndicate which has been forced, at the last gasp, to step in and try to save Morgan's bankrupt stocks from going to nothing? . . . How the deuce do the Jews manage to make this chaos stand on end . . . The whole carcase is rotten with worms—socialist worms, anarchist worms, Jew worms . . . " (Letter to John Hay from Paris, July 28, 1896.) (Pages 376-7).

"The Spanish Panama. How to keep our government clear of this I do not know.... Even a war would only intensify it, for, today or a hundred years hence, the whole Rothchild influence, backed by every government in Europe, every banking interest, all the press, all Wall Street, and all the churches, will drive us into this fatal step of increasing American indebtedness to Europe... Undoubtedly, the Rothchilds can drive both Spain and us into any settlement they dictate. I would rather continue the war, but at the end of the war, however far, stand the Rothchilds waiting for me." (Letter to John Hay from Washington, Oct. 23, 1896). (Page 391).

The extract below is from a poem in Benjamin Franklin's papers as printed in "Works of Franklin" by John Bigelow.

On General Benedict Arnold: "To Mammon yielding all that Freedom gave, Enleagued with friends of that detested Tribe Whose god is Gold and whose saviour is a Bribe, Could basely join, his country to Betray . . ."

(On Page 234 of Volume 7, "Works of Franklin" by Bigelow, is reprint of a letter from Benjamin Franklin to Lafayette from Passy, France, May 14, 1781, referring to Benedict Arnold's treachery, in which Franklin said: "Enclosed is copy of letter from his (Arnold's) agent in England, captured by one of our cruisers... Judas sold only one man, Arnold three million.")

EINSTEIN CONFESSES

The following is from Edmondson Bulletin of Nov. 28. 1938:

Jewish Professor Albert Einstein, (who left Germany when Jewish Communists left to escape Hitler) is quoted in Collier's Weekly of Nov. 26, 1938, as making the following admission:

"Anti-Semitism is nothing but the ANTAGONISTIC attitude produced in the non-Jew BY the Jewish Group. * * * The Jewish Group HAS THRIVED on oppression and on the antagonism it has forever met in the world, * * * The sum of the achievements of their (Jewish Group) individual members is EVERYWHERE CONSIDERABLE. The Jew who abandons his faith * * * REMAINS A JEW."

Observe the implications of that Jewish confession:

• (1) This pre-eminent leader and representative Jew, evidently speaking for Jewry, not only admits in the foregoing that the Jew himself creates the very persecution about which he constantly wails, but by confessing that Jews actually THRIVE on it, Gentiles are forced to accept the premise that Jewish Leadership CAUSES "POGROMS" so that the tribe may materialistically profit thereby.
• (2) He admits that Jewish power is very important and effective in Gentile world affairs.
• (3) He admits that the word "Jew" stands for many more things than religion.
• (4) He admits that Jews remain Jews after they abandon the so-called Jewish religion.

To learn the KIND of antagonism the Jews create in the non-Jews in order that they may profit, digest the statement of Louis S. Posner, Manhattan Chair-

man of the N. Y. campaign of the American ORT Federation to get funds for training European Jews. The N. Y. Times of Nov. 23, 1938, quotes him as

saving:

"The anti-Semitic trouble in Europe is NOT the result of the RELIGIOUS views of the Jews, and is NOT THE result of the cultural or RACIAL differences between Jew and Christian. It is due MAINLY to ECONOMIC conditions."

I have unwaveringly held that the Jewish Problem in America is ECON-OMIC and political, not religious or racial.

This Einstein confession completely vindicates a bulletin published by the undersigned on August 1st. 1935, headed. "Thriving on Persecution."

"Persecution cannot crush the Jew. He is the aristocrat of the world."—Samuel Untermyer, quoted in the London Investigator of June, 1935.

"DEMOCRACY"

Not in U.S. Constitution

(From an Edmondson address before the Anti-Communist Society of Allentown, Penna., Dec. 9, 1938.)

FELLOW PATRIOTS:

You have seen the Communist slogan: "Communism is Twentieth Cen-

tury Americanism!"

You have heard Communist Leader Browder bellow for "democracy" and call on his followers to vote for the Roosevelt New Dealers, who spout "democracy" while they play for socialism.

"We are not only the largest and most powerful DEMOCRACY in the whole world, but many other democracies look to us for leadership—that WORLD DEMOCRACY may survive," vociferated President Roosevelt in his speech quoted in the N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938.

But you know that the United States of America was established as A

Representative Republic—not a Democracy;

That, by Section 4, Article 4 of the Constitution, each state in the Union is guaranteed "A Republician Form of Government;"—By The Republic of the United States.

That the checks and balances provided by the founding fathers were designed to safeguard against democratic tyranny as well as autocratic dictatorship.

But do you also know that in neither the Constitution as amended, nor in the Declaration of Independence, does the word "DEMOCRACY" anywhere

appear

Let us dig deeper into this democracy business. Rabbis demand for America "A Thoroughly Socialized Democracy." If you will read the N. Y. Times of Sept. 13, 1936, you will see an item therein quoting a resolution by the great Central Conference of American Rabbis, largest Sanhedrin in the World. That resolution calls for the scrapping of the American System. (See Foot Notes 1 and 2).

What is a "socialized democracy?" Russia answers! The Soviets are ostensibly Communist, but the official title of the Government is "Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics." Jews established it!

On July 4, 1937, the Editor of The N. Y. Morning Freheit (largest Communist daily in the U. S.), M. J. Olgin, Russian born Jew, published the following:

"Communism is Twentieth Century Americanism. Communism is the theory and practice of putting into the terms of the present social forces the doctrine of the Declaration of Independence."

Communism is the violence-tool by which its advocates hope to establish Socialism, the end product. What is this socialism? A political rule where individuals are regimented into machines, a condition of human slave-existence where the good of the state is always above that of the individual, who is leveled down to the lowest intelligence in the mass.

We Americans want no Democracy-Communism-Socialism. Individualistic Americanism is the most deadly for Communism-Socialism has. It levels up, not down. Individual creative genius is the Soul of Progress. Communism-Socialism are the REAL REACTIONARIES. For Individualism, the preservation of Americanism is worth any sacrifice, in my opinion.

What a fight we are in! It will take all we've got to win, because we come into conflict with citizens who seem to like to advertize their ignorance. But Americans have shown themselves to be unbeatable, and I have no doubt as to the result,—ONCE THEY KNOW!

Often we fighters wonder why we keep on sacrificing personal resources, comforts and health, with so much judaized selfishness, cowardice and apathy around us; but there is something inside that tells us to go on; and we try to emulate the stout old Scotch warrior, who cried: "I'll lay me down and bleed a while, and then get up and fight again!"

NOTE NO. 1:—"Social Democracy" is defined thus in Webster's Dictionary: "The SOCIALIST PARTY founded in Germany in 1863 by Ferdinand LaSalle (JEW), in 1875 united with the followers of Karl Marx (JEW), aiming to secure adoption of state SOCIALISM (As in Russia). See Funk & Fagnalls Dictionary definition of Russia's Jewish Bolshevik Party, viz: "The TERRORISTIC Branch of the SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY;" and then refer to Webster's Dictionary description of "Bolshevik," thus: "Radical Wing of the SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY in Russia, NOW CALLED THE COMMUNIST PARTY."

NOTE NO. 2—Constitution-Framer James Madison, who, in "The Federalist," is held to have "sold" The Constitution to the American People, denounced "democracies" in these words: "Pure democracies have ever been the scenes of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with PERSONAL SECURITY or rights of property."

FAMOUS BRITISH AUTHOR SAYS JEWS ARE "AT THE BOTTOM" OF ALL GENTILE TROUBLES

From Edmondson Bulletin of January 4, 1939.

Nesta H. Webster, of Great Britain, famous author of "World Revolution," "Secret Societies & Subversive Movements," "Surrender of an Empire" and other exceptionally documented books, has just written "Germany & England," a penetrating analysis of the present political situation saying:

"Hitler took the control of Germany out of the hands of the Jews. We are faced with a ruler who, although a dictator, REPRESENTS THE WILL OF NINETY-PER CENT OF THE POPULATION, a plain man of the people, too socialistic for us.

"The essence of Fascism and Nazism is NATIONALISM, while that of Bolshevism is INTERNATIONALISM.

"After Russia had been brought low and a hideous revenge taken on her by the PREDOMINANTLY JEWISH BOLSHEVIKS, the Jews started bolshevizing Germany, and having got her almost completely under control they memained pro German until the rise of Hitler. It was then that the whole Jewish power turned against Germany. The Jews had not minded a certain amount of persecution as long as they were given power in the state. This is precisely what Hitler took from them, hence largely the cry of persecution. A Jew, Ernest Lissauer, who coined the phrase 'Gott Strafe England,' composed the 'Hymn of Hate.'

"Since the main cause de guerre against Hitler is his treatment of the Jews, it is most urgent for people in this country to know the truth about it. BUT THAT IS JUST THE DIFFICULTY. The British public derives its information from the newspapers or the radio, WHICH ARE LARGELY CONTROLLED BY JEWS, AND IN TURN RECEIVE THEIR INFOR-

MATION FROM JEWISH SOURCES.

"England of 1938 is not the England of 1914 because she is no longer controlled by Britons. WE ARE UNDER AN INVISIBLE JEWISH DICTATORSHIP—a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life."

From the foregoing, it is evident that the famous European author has had further confirmation supplementing the following extract from a letter written by her on May 4, 1934, to Arthur Goadby, a New York friend of the

undersigned:

"Personally, I am more than ever inclined to believe that The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are genuine. Without them I do not see how one could explain things that are happening today. More than ever, I THINK THE JEWS ARE AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL OUR TROUBLES."

"FEAR OF THE JEWS" Puts Frankfurter on U. S. Supreme Court From Edmondson Bulletin of January 12, 1939)

At the Senate Judiciary Sub-Committee hearing in Washington on President Roosevelt's appointment of Harvard's Zionist Professor to the U. S. Supreme Court, Senator P. F. McCarran of Nevada asked if Frankfurter believed in the doctrine of Marxism—according to the N. Y. World-Telegram of Jan. 12, 1939:

"Mr. Frankfurter snapped: 'I do not believe you are any more attached to the THEORY OF Americanism than I am. I do not believe that you have ever taken the oath to support the Constitution of the U. S. with less reservation

than I have or would now."

Do Senators take oath with ANY reservation?

"Who's Who in American Jewry" says Frankfurter was "Associated with the Brandeis-Mack Leadership of the Zionist Organization of America, and was Legal Advisor of the Zionist Delegation at the Versailles Peace Conference at Paris in 1919."

"Speaking as an American, I cannot for a moment concede that one can be AT THE SAME TIME A TRUE AMERICAN AND AN HONEST AD-HERENT OF THE ZIONIST MOVEMENT. They who believe in and hope and labor for an ultimate restoration of Jewish POLITICAL life, and the reestablishment of a Jewish NATION, place a PRIOR LIEN upon their citizenship which * * * WOULD PREVENT THEM FROM MAINTANING ALLEGIANCE TO THE COUNTRY OF WHICH THEY NOW CLAIM TO BE GOOD CITIZENS."—Jacob Schiff, N. Y. Sun of Sept. 4, 1907.

How can Zionist Frankfurter reconcile that doctrine with his "allegiance to the Constitution"—or does he rely upon the advance absolution provided by the "reverse" Jewish Kol Nidre "prayer," reading: "All oaths * * * with which we may bind ourselves from this Day of Atonement until the next Day of Atonement * * * we repent them all. May they be made null and void."

Under the circumstances, is Zionist Frankfurter, who owes a foreign al-

legiance, FIT to sit in judgement on citizens of the U. S.:

The World Telegram report continues:

"Nor do I believe you are more attached to the theories and principles

of Americanism than I am.' (Frankfurter added)

What IS Americanism? Let the American Veterans organizations answer — "Americanism is an unfailing love of country; loyalty to its institutions and ideals; eagerness to defend it against all enemies (that means Communists); undivided allegiance to the flag."

Signed by all the American war veteran organizations and promulgated in February, 1927, the Americanism definition quoted was not signed by the

"Jewish War Veterans of the U. S." Why?

Some light on the subject may be had by reading the following from "Der Jude" (of Germany) (1916) by Zionist Leader Klatzkin: "Only the Jewish Code rules our life. We form in ourselves a closed business and juridical corporation. A strong wall separates us from the peoples in the lands in which we live—and behind that wall is A JEWISH STATE."

Mr. Frankfurter said he never attended meetings of the American Civil

Liberties Union, and was not among its executives.

He is a National Committeeman—and the N. Y. American of Nov. 7, 1935, said: "Frankfurter is AN ACTIVE MEMBER of the Communistic ACLIL"

Former President Theodore Roosevelt wrote Frankfurter Dec. 19, 1917, on the Mooney Case: "You are taking an attitude which seems to me to be fundamentally that of Trotsky and other Bolsheviki leaders—an attitude which may be fraught with mischief to this country. * * * I have received your report on the Bisbee deportation. * * * Your report is as thoroughly a misleading document as could be written on the subject. * * Here again, you are engaged in excusing men precisely like the Bolsheviki, who are murderers and encouragers of murder; who are traitors to their allies, to democracy and to civilization, as well as to the U. S.; and whose acts are nevertheless apologized for on grounds substantially like those which you allege."

NEW DEAL LEGAL MASTER-MIND

The Simon-Schuster 1934 book, "The New Dealers," says: "More than any other one person, Frankfurter is the legal master mind of the New Deal. Frankfurter men are established in key posts throughout the Roosevelt Administration. FRANKFURTER ADVISED THE ADMINISTRATION ON ITS MAIN STRATEGY WITH REGARD TO THE SUPREME COURT." "Packing!"

The World-Telegram report continued as follows:

"'Did you know that William Z. Foster (notorious Communist) was a member of the National Committee of the ACLU?"

"'I knew that he was on it at one time.' (Frankfurter reply).

"Senator McCarren said: 'I SHOULD THINK THAT A MAN IN YOUR HIGH PLACE WOULD INVESTIGATE HIS ASSOCIATES."

"Frankfurter's face reddened. I base my association with the Union on the record of its actions."

Another diversive retort? This is what Congressional Report of the House, No. 2290, Jan. 17, 1931, describes as ACTIONS: "The American Civil Liberties Union is closely affiliated with the Communist movement in the U. S., and fully 90% of its efforts are on behalf of Communists who have come in conflict with the law. It is quite apparent that the main function of the ACLU is to attempt to protect Communists in their advocacy of force and violence to overthrow the U. S. Govt."

Report 2290 also quotes the Chairman of the Communism investigating Committee as asking Director Roger N. Baldwin of the American Civil Liberties Union if his ORGANIZATION upheld the right of a citizen or an alien to advocate the overthrow of the U. S. Government by force and violence. "THAT IS THE ORGANIZATION'S POSITION," answered Baldwin.

"HE DOTH PROTEST TOO MUCH"

FRANKLY, I DON'T BELIEVE WHAT FRANKFURTER SAYS ABOUT HIMSELF AND HIS VIEWS. That is my right, just as I am within legal bounds when I declare that I hold an honest belief in the truth of the matter herein presented, regarding an aspirant for public office, and submit fair patriotic comment thereon without malice.

Many protests were made to the Senate Judiciary Sub-Committee, which ignored them as of no value when it unanimously endorsed Frankfurter.

WHY?

1940 ADDENDA

"DUE PROCESS CLAUSES OUGHT TO GO"

Declaring that the due process clauses of the 14th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution protect Jews from pogroms in America, Senator Josiah W. Bailey of North Carolina, addressing the Senate March 17, 1938, on the Reorganization Bill, made the following statement:

"I was talking with a gentleman of the Jewish race, a Member of the Congress, in the lobby of a hotel the other evening. He said that he never had

any respect for the due-process clause in the Constitution.

"I was very much amazed, as he is an intelligent man.

"He said: 'I was born here.'

"I said: 'And you have no respect for the clause requiring that no man's life, liberty, or property shall be taken from him, either by the Federal Government or by a State, except by due process of law?'

"He said: 'It is just a means of beating the devil around the stump."

"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the U. S.; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws."—14th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution.

In the "Law and Politics of Prof. Felix Frankfurter," 1938, edited and sponsored by Archibald MacLeish, Librarian of Congress, appears the following from Frankfurter:

"We have had 50 years of experiment with the 14th Amendment, and the centralizing authority lodged with the Supreme Court over the domestic affairs of 48 widely different states is an authority which it simply cannot discharge with safety either to itself or the states. THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSES OUGHT TO GO!"

Since Frankfurter says also "The U. S. Supreme Court IS the Constitution" (N. Y. Times 4-17-30), the logical conclusion is that this Jewish Justice is "working over" the rest of that high tribunal in order to alter the Constitution, eliminate the due process clauses, and deprive Gentiles of "life, liberty and property."

WHO RULES RUSSIA?

(Edmondson Bulletin, revised, Chronologically, to 1939.)

"Beria, newest addition to the Council of People's Commissars of Russia, like many other recent proteges of the Kaganowitsch family, is Jewish. THE INCREASING JEWISH CHARACTER OF THE BOLSHEVIK REGIME is said to explain its growing anti-German measures."—Chicago Tribune, January 5, 1939, by its Correspondent Donald Day at Riga, Latvia, with whom Edmondson had personal correspondence.

This is the latest up to date confirmation of the continuance of the Jewish Dominaarion of Russia, beginning with the Jewish Kerensky start of the revolution that established the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics, directed by a Committee of 545 of whom 447 were Jews. The following chronological order is illuminating.

1918, Sept. 18: Netherlands Representative Oudendyke at St. Petersburg reported (as reproduced by British White Paper of April, 1910): "Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread, in one form or another, all over the world, as it is organized BY JEWS, whose one object is to destroy, for their own ends, the existing order of things."

1918, December, "Jews in Russia" by Victor Marsden, Russian Correspondent of the London Post, says in the Personnel of the First Soviet Bureaucracy were 17 Jews of 22 members; War Commissariat, 34 Jews our of 43; Commissariat of the Interior, 45 Jews out of 64; Commissariat, 34 Jews our of 43; Commissariat of the Interior, 45 Jews out of 64; Commisser on Foreign Affairs, 13 Jews out of 17; Commissariat of the Exchequer, 26 Jews out of 30; Commissariat of Justice, 18 Jews out of 19; Commission of Hygiene, 4 Jews out of 5; Commissariar of Public Instruction, 44 Jews out of 53; Commission of Social Aid, 6 Jews out of 6; Commission of Works, 7 Jews out of 8; Commission of Reconstruction of Jaroslav, 2 Jews out of 2; Delegates Bolshevist Red Cross, 8 Jews out of 8; Provincial Commissars, 21 Jews out of 23; Journalists, 41 Jews out of 42: Commission of Inquiry on Late Officials of the Empire, 5 Jews out of 7; Committee of Inquiry on Assassination of Emperor, 7 Jews out of 10; Supreme Council of General Economy, 45 Jews out of 56; Bureau of First Soviet of Workmen and Soldiers of Moscow. 19 Jews out of 23; Central Committee of the 4th Congress of Soviets, 33 Jews out of 34; Executive Committee of the 5th Congress, 34 Jews out of 62; Central Committee of Social Democratic Party, 9 Jews out of 12; Grand Total, 447 Jews out of 545.

Peoples Communist Party Central Bureau, 5 Jews our of 6; Social Democratic Party Central Committee, 11 Jews out of 11; Socialist Revolutionary Party of the Left, 10 Jews out of 12. Marsden lists names, and says "Jewry is a Bund with its own Secret Government."

1919, February issue N. Y. "Jewish Forum," by Rabbi Judah L. Magnes: "The revolution in Russia set creative forces free—and look what a large company of Jews were available for immediate service!"

1919, February 12, U. S. Senate Overman Committee Report, Testimony of Rev. George Albert Simons, of the Methodist Chutch, "In December, 1918, under a man known as Apfelbaum (Zinovietf), out of 388 members (of the Bolshevist Revolutionary Committee) only 16 happened to be real Russians—all the rest were Jews with the exception of a negro; and 265 of these came from the lower East Side of N. Y. City."

1919, March 29. London Times: "Of the leaders who provided the central machinery of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% were Jews."

1919, April 4, London Jewish Chronicle: "The ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism."

1920, Jan. 11, "Bolshevism is Jewish," Editor A. S. Leese of England, quotes Gen. M. Schuyler of the U. S. Army as saying: "The Government of Russia is almost entirely Jewish, and our U. S. Army in Siberia was full of Bolshevist Jews direct from Moscow."

1920, Feb.-Mar, issue of "Asia," reported "In All Bolshevist institutions the heads

are Jews."

1920, Sept. 10, American Hebrew of N. Y.: "What Jewish Idealism and Jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities are tending to promote in other countries."

1920. July, "World Significance of the Russian Revolution," preface by Dr. Oscar Levy, London Jewish Savant, says: "Jewish elements provide the driving force for both Communism and Capitalism." 1923, Dec. 13, Correspondent Claire Sheridan in the N. Y. World: "The Communists

are Jews, and Russia is entirely dominated by them."

1924, Dec. 19, U. S. Congressional Record quotes Jewish Chairman Zinovieff of the Communist 3rd International: "We have exterminated the property owners in Russia.

We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America."

1933, Oct. 21-28, London Catholic Herald, Dr. A. Homer: "The Soviet movement was a Jewish and not a Russian conception, Of the 224 revolutionaries who in 1917 were dispatched to Russia with Lenin to foment the Bolshevik Revolution. 170 were Jews. The Jewish Chronicle of Jan. 6, 1933, said: Over one-third of the Jews in Russia have become officials."

1933. December "Opinion," a Jewish N. Y. Magazine under Rabbi S. S. Wise's editorship: "With the rise of the Soviet Regime, Jews have been granted rights not accorded even in the most advanced countries. The state, which previously did not employ any Jews, now employs in White Russia 61% Jewish officials. A Jew is commander of the Ukranian Army; a Jew is President of the State Bank; Jews occupy almost all important ambassadorial positions; universities, professions, judiciary and administration, now have a greater percentage of Jews than any other nationality. Anti-Semitism has been declared a state offense, and is punished as counter-revolution."

1934, February 'New Outlook" Magazine of N. Y., James Abbe, author of "1 Photograph Russia," says: "The men who control Russia are not Russians, Members of

the lewish race from all over the world predominate

1935. Oct. 29, "The New Masses," James Waterman Wise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise, says: "Litvinoff, Yaroslavsky, Kaganowirsch, Radek, Bela Kuhn and Trotsky are Communist leaders in the Soviet." (All Jews.)

1936. February "Defender" Magazine of Wichita, Kan.: "The Central Committee of the Communist Party at Moscow is the very heart throb of international Communism. There are 59 members, and 56 are Jews. The templing three are married to Jewester.

1937. "GK's Weekly." London, Feb. 4, quotes Hilaire Belloc, author of "The Jews." thus: "As for any one who does not know that the present revolutionary movement is Jewish in Russia. I can only say that he is taken in by the suppressions of our deplorable press."

1937, May London Catholic Times: "The Soviet Government has been and still is

largely composed of Jews."

1938, Feb. 10. "The Irish Catholic" of Dublin, quotes A. Stolypine, son of former Russian Minister who was assassinated by a Jew in 1911, "Stalin's government has never been and will never be a national government. Israel will always be a controlling power.

1938, Feb. 17, N. Y. Times Cable from Rome, Italy, quoting escaped Russian Envoy Butenko to Rumania: "Jews control big industry, have a monopoly of production, and

live lives of luxury in Russia."

1938. October, "Rulers of Russia." 34 pages, by Rev. Denis Fahey, quoting introduction: "In this pamphlet I present to my readers a number of serious documents which go to show that the real forces behind Bolshevism in Russia are Jewish forces, and that Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews, for the establishment of their future Messianic kingdom."

The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews . . . are internationalists, and are trying to start a worldwide revolution."—U. S. Ambassador Francis to Russia, taken

from his "Russia from the American Embassy." in Library of Congress.

"Through Thirty Years," a 1924 book by H. Wickham Steed, British journalist:: "Schiff, Warburg and other international financiers, wished to bolster up the Jewish revolutionaries to secure a field for Jewish exploitation of Russia"—reference being to Jewish loans to promote the revolution.

"Impressions of Soviet Russia," a publication by Charles Sarolea, Edinburgh professor, student of Russian conditions for 35 years: "I am quite prepared to admit that the Jewish leaders (in Russia) are only a proportionately infinitesimal fraction; but it is none the less true that those few Jewish leaders are THE MASTERS OF RUSSIA."

"The Hidden Hand," by Col. A. H. Lane of England: "The supreme conflict in the world today is between anti-Bolshevism and Bolshevism, the tool and agent of the Jewish Hidden Hand. In spite of Moscow 'executions' so dramatically written up in the Jew-controlled press of the world, the Jewish control of foreign-contact positions in Russia remains unaffected."

Victor Marsden, British Russian Correspondent, Translator of "Protocols of Elders of Zion," says Lenin was a Calmyc Jew, whose wife was Jewish and whose children spoke Yiddish. Lenin attended Zionist meetings. Scotland Yard Detective H. T. Fitch, in "The King's Shadow," said he served Lenin disguised as a waiter, and that he was a "typical round-headed Jew."

(The above record was prepared as a court exhibit in rebuttal of a Washington 1944 prosecution contrary allegation.)

ADDENDA

While engaged in the early part of the patriotic crusade in New York City I met Rev. George Albert Simons, referred to in the Overman Senate Committee report. In his talks with me this Methodist minister more than confirmed his testimony about Jewish rule in Russia, and said there was no doubt in his mind that it continued. He was subjected to persistent Jewish persecution on his return to the U. S.

About this time I also met Dr. J. E. Conner, formerly U. S. Consul at St. Petersburg during the revolution. He told me he saw automobiles driven by Jews, machine-gunning crowds of people in the Russian capital. He reported to Washington—and was soon thereafter removed from his post. He told me that for years afterward he was Jew-hounded out of every position he obtained. Finally, impoverished, he died in a Brooklyn, N. Y., Y. M. C. A. room.

JEWISH CAPITALISM BACKING COMMUNISM

(Edmondson Bulletin of Jan. 25, 1939)

Since Jews have been historically notorious as capitalistic exploiters, what evidence is there to support the charge that Jews and Communism are allies and that International Jewish Finance is backing Communism Bolshevism-Socialism, the International Trinity that is today trying to destroy Nationalism is a question skeptics frequently put.

Below are documentary references, including confessions from Jewish authorities, indicating that Jewish Leadership is using International -Communism-Bolshevism-Socialism as a tool or weapon to exploit and break down Gentile politics, economics, culture and pational Patriotism, the chief enemy of Jewish Internationalism.

"The Jew evolved organized capitalism and its working instrumentality, the banking system," said the American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920. The Jew Karl Marx, is "The Father of Communism."

In "The American Mercury" for April, 1935. Jewish Anarchist Emma Goldman declared that the Soviet (Jewish established) had become the crassest form of state repitalism."

"Who's Who in American Jewry" and Jewish "Rolls of Honor" place the Capitalist Jews Baruch, Morgenthau, Brandeis and Lehman beside Communist Jew leaders Trotsky,

Litvinott, Olgin, Blum et al

In his book "The Truth about the Slump," author A. N. Field points out: "The enormously significant thing today is that the Jewish power of the purse and revolutionary activities are working in a common direction, and there is a mass of evidence that they are working in UNISON.

"When we 'sink' we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic); when we rise, there arises also the terrible power of the purse (capitalistic)."—Theo Herzl in "The Jewish State"

In his booklet. "The Jewish Assault on Christianity," Rev. Dr. G. B. Winrod of Wichita. Kansas, says: "It is impossible to separate Jewish Capitalism from Jewish Communism."

The London Catholic Herald of Oct. 21, 28 and Nov. 4, 1933, published: "Astute Jew financiers would not be so stupid as to put vast amounts of Capital into the world-wide activities of Bolshevism (Communism) unless they were certain in their own minds that their own interests and power were secure."

The N. Y. Times of June 28, 1934, said: "The underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy of Justice Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court. The NRA is

almost a composite of his dissenting opinions."

The Arkansas Gazette of May 30, 1927, printed this evidence, "A check for \$100 was received recently as a contribution by Commonwealth College of Mena, Ark., from Louis D. Brandeis, Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court." That college was investigated as Communistic by the Arkansas Legislature.

The N. Y. Jewish Day of May 11, 1937, said: "The Rabbinical Assembly favors the general tendency of the recently adopted social legislation, and in particular the

TVA." Socialist Norman Thomas said the TVA was typically Socialist.

The Chicago Jewish Sentinel of Sept. 22, 1938, admits that: "The film industry * * * absorbs its share—AND MORE—of Jewish refugees"—expelled as Communists from Germany.

"COLONEL" EDMONDSON PUT BACK INTO JEWISH PUBLICITY

(Bulletin of Feb. 21, 1939)

"Father Charles E. Coughlin should be prosecuted because, in violation of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the U. S. he persists in libeling the Jewish Religion. He is amenable to both ecclesiastic law of the Catholic Church, and also to the law of our country. If these battles should be initiated by our government it may also have the salutary effect of forever silencing such enemies who promote the destruction of American DEMOCRACY as Colonel Robert Edward Edmondson of New York."

The above is from an article "By Julius Hochfelder, LL.M., Ph. D.," Page 4 of The California Jewish Voice, Feb. 3, 1939. Hochfelder is identified thus in the 1938-9 "Who's Who in American Jewry" Page 446: "Julius Hochfelder, LL.M., Ph.D., member of Bar Assn. of N.Y., BORN HUNGARY, 1880."

(Before exposing this foreign-born Jew lawyer's misinterpretation of American Constitutional Philosophy and Law, may the undersigned native born American veteran journalist first inject a personal note. By his article, I welcome my return to the columns of the jewspapers. The conspiracy of silence in this respect had become "deafening" since the American Hebrew sometime ago announced that nevermore would a certain No. 1 Anti-Semite be mentioned. Now, I am grateful to "Hungarian" Hochfelder for having restored me to disfavor, and it is with patriotic ardor that I redouble efforts, especially since he has promoted me to the rank of COLONEL. Maybe increased loyalty to duty will bring a Jewish GENERALSHIP.—or perchance, a medal, since Jews are hell on medals. But, let's look at the record and get down to business.)

Hochfelder says I'm destroying American "DEMOCRACY" by exposing Jewish anti-Americanism. Now, what is this "democracy?" The word doesn't appear in the Constitution of the U. S., and that historic document takes pains, by Section 4, Article 4, to guarantee to every sovereign state of the American Union "A Republican form of government."

It is worthy of note that the Central Conference of American Rabbis (N. Y. Times, Sept. 13, 1936) challenged the American Christian Social System, and demanded, in substitution therefor, "A Thoroughly Socialized Democracy," which "Social Democracy" is described in Webster's Dictionary as "The COMMUNIST PARTY in Russia."

If such "Jewmocracy" is what Hochfelder means by "Democracy," he can bet his last shekel that I'm out to destroy it in the U. S. A.:

NO GROUP LIBEL LAW

So much for the Philosophy of the American Government. Now, as to American LAW. There is no law in the U. S. prohibiting the publishing of a libel of any religion or group. The Constitution of The Republic and every sovereign state within it substantially provides that no law shall be made "respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The Constitution of New York State properly adds: "The liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state."

In dismissing May 10, 1938, the charge of "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion" in the Edmondson-LaGuardia Case, Judge Wallace of New York said in part: "After consideration of briefs submitted by The People,

The Defendant and amicus curiae, the Court, on its own motion, and IN FURTHERANCE OF JUSTICE, dismisses the indictment which charges The Defendant with libeling all persons of The Jewish Religion."

In a letter to the N. Y. Herald-Tribune, published Aug. 29, 1936, Louis Waldman, N. Y. lawyer, wrote as follows: "The remedy sought by Mayor LaGuardia to be invoked against them (disseminators of anti-Semitic propaganda), is SOCIALLY DANGEROUS AND LEGALLY UNSOUND."

Here we have "Hungarian" Hochfelder on one side of the fence, and another foreign-born Socialist Jew—"Russian" Waldman—on the other; both sides as usual, promoting confusion, the "divide and rule" policy of International Jewry.

However, the undersigned thanks "Hungarian" Hochfelder for affording the opportunity of using his legal "masterpiece" as a sounding board for more exposure publicity—and cordially invites him to "come again!"

UNMASKING CONGRESSMAN SABATH

(Feb. 23, 1939 Broadcast)

(An Open Defense-Letter, February 28, 1939)

To Congressman Adolph J. Sabath of Illinois Chairman of The House Rules Committee, Washington, D.C.

Sir:

On Feb. 13, 1939, replying to a letter of Feb. 6 from Walter Steele, General Manager of the National Republic Magazine, in which he protested his branding as an Anti-Semitic promoter by Congressman Marcantonio, you included the following provocative paragraph, wherein you "extended yourself" under the immunity of The Floor—as printed on Page 2238 of the Congressional Record of Feb. 17, 1939, thereby making a public document:

"Col. E. N. Sanctuary * * * Eastern Representative of Col H. A. Jung of the American Vigilant Intelligence Federation of Chicago * * * is an associate of THE MOST VICIOUS AND CRIMINAL ANTI-SEMITES IN AMERICA—such men as Robert Edward Edmondson and James True. And behind all these is the High Priestess of the Nazi-movement in America, Mrs. Elizabeth Dilling. The assembled facts show that you (Steele) are indeed, as Congressman Marcantonio charged, closely identified with 'the most dangerous, undemocratic, un-American and subversive groups in the U. S."

I note that Who's Who in America Jewry reports you as having been BORN IN CZECHO-SLOVAKIA.

In the Feb. 12, 1939, issue of the Constitutional Protective League of Illinois, Inc., 2405 Board of Trade Bldg., Chicago, I find the following quotation from the Sept., 1936, report of the Illinois National Defense Council:

"Adolph Sabath: In Congress 30 years. Has never voted for national defense movements within our program. * * * We have repeatedly found that plans for national defense are not safe in his hands."

Congressman Marcantonio is reported as heading the International Labor Defense, which is described thus in Mrs. Dilling's "Red Network"—"The American section of the controlled Communist International Red Aid; legally aids and propagandizes in behalf of Communist criminals arrested for revolutionary activities; co-operating with American Civil Liberties Union"—the

Frankfurter-Ernst-Hays Jewish organization, champion of communizers. Marcantonio is not listed as a Jew, although his activities are pro-Jewish; but for the present we may classify him according to the formula now proclaimed in New York, viz.: 'New Dealers are circumcised Democrats.''

But—what is there "vicious" about my "stuff?" Is it because the publications are documentary reproductions of what the Jews say about themselves and how they are propaganda-blinding, confusion-dividing and politically-ruling gullible Gentiles? In THAT respect I concede that the term is "vicious." And I forsee a dreadful reckoning!

What is there "criminal" about my publications? In dismissing, May 10, 1938, the Jewish-Majority Grand Jury indictment against me in Jewish La-Guardia's N. Y. City, charging "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion" because I exposed Jewish communizing activities, the court said the dismissal was "in the furtherance of justice." Where is the criminality? Did you deliberately LIE?

As usual, the Jewish prosecution hid behind the complaint-title "The People of the State of New York versus Robert Edward Edmondson;" but it was smoked out. Defendant Edmondson subpoenaed "Princes of Jewry" Bernard Baruch, Felix Frankfurter, Henry Morgenthau, Rabbi Wise, Samuel Untermyer, Mayor LaGuardia, James P. Warburg, Walter Lippmann, Justice Samuel I. Rosenman. Whereupon your American Jewish Committee and the American Jewish Congress PETITIONED THE COURT NOT TO TRY THE CASE because the indictment violated the free speech guarantee of the Constitution.

Are you Jews afraid to face facts? You certainly could not have feared an humble individual patriot like myself, with one lone lawyer and a few Jew-deflated dollars for defence—as against a thousand Jewish lights backed by billions.

No, Mr. Congressman, Jews are afraid of the TRUTH. They know that a few grains of it, plus a little courage, will blow the lid off when publicized.

You have emphasized "undemocratic groups" in connection with your denunciation of the undersigned. As a citizen of a republic—not a democracy—I plead guilty to that charge, since a democracy, particularly the Social Democracy demanded by your Central Conference of American Rabbis, is COM-MUNISTIC. You can count on me as being against such democracy to the last ditch.

You Jews call me "Professional Patriot." Well, I'd rather be that than a "Professional Jew" or a "Professional Politician," both of whom contributed destruction to the Gentile state, whereas a "Professional Patriot" contributes something constructive to the country that shelters him. However that may be, Mr. Congressman, my patriotic "nest" is almost as bare as Mother Hubbard's cupboard; but I'll bet your "coffers are full" of America's hospitable bounty.

SOUTH AFRICA WARNS JEWS

Extracts from speech delivered by Eric H. Louw Feb. 24, 1939, in the South African House of Assembly on the "Alien and Immigration Bill," are reproduced below:

"I am convinced that if it were possible to remove Jewish influence and pressure FROM THE PRESS AND NEWS AGENCIES, the international outlook would be considerably brighter. In introducing this bill I am actuated neither by Fascism nor Racialism. I have acted solely as a South African. The main principle of this bill is that it admits the existence in South Africa of a Jewish Problem. It is perhaps appropriate that Communism should be dealt with in a bill which also deals with the Jewish Question because Communism, since its earliest days, has been linked with Jewry.

"Communism is International, and a Jew is International in his outlook. Communism had its birth in the teachings of Karl Marx, a Jew. I remember the Soviet delegation to the League of Nations included seven Jews and one Russian. We find that in most countries where Communism has taken root, the leaders of Communism are Jews.

"The Communist makes no distinction whatever on political, social or economic grounds, between the black and white races, which is particularly important for us in South Africa.

"Why is the principle of discrimination introduced into my bill? Because, in the first place, the Jew is not assimilable. That he is not assimilable has been shown by the records of history, and it is also admitted by himself. Even in America, the so-called melting-pot of the world, Jews have remained a separate nation.

"Ludwig Lewisohn, a well-known Jewish writer, says: 'Assimilation is impossible, because the Jew cannot change his national character.' I find in 'A Book of Jewish Thoughts' by Dr. J. H. Hertz, this statement: 'What I understand by assimilation is loss of identity. It is the kind of assimilation I dread most, even more than pogroms.' Basil M. Henriques, a distinguished Jew, made a speech in London reported in the Zionist Record of South Africa, Jan. 29, 1939, saying: 'There must be no assimilation. We are a peculiar people, and a peculiar people we must remain.' Ludwig Lewisohn also says: 'We are a people; we are a nationality.'

"Another Jewish factor which causes friction is Jewish control of finance and business, the formation of monopolies, and domination of the professions. This is particularly so with regard to high finance and international banking. The International banker controls credit, and through it he controls industry and trade.

"In Johannesburg 65% of the attorney firms are Jewish; in Cape Town the attorneys are 41% Jewish. As regards medical practitioners, in Johannesburg 48% are Jews; in Cape Town 31%.

"May I commend, Sir, to this House and also to the members who are Jews, and to Jews outside of this house, the words of a man who is a friend of the Jews—Author Hilaire Belloc, who says: There is a Jewish Problem, and the Jews who resent the statement of the problem and an attempt at solving it, are not doing their own people any good; and they are at the same time denying us the right to put our own house in order—WHICH IS OF COURSE INTOLERABLE."

"AMERICAN MASQUERADERS" (Mar. 7, 1939, Edmondson Bulletin)

Under the smear-title "Fascism in America," the March 6, 1939, issue of the weekly magazine "Life," published in The Ghetto of the Nation, lists in part as below, anti-Communist U. S. agencies as "American Masqueraders," in a pro-Jew article covering eight full pages, designed to belittle a recent Madison Square Garden huge anti-Jew mass meeting.

American Nationalist Confederation; League for Constitutional Government of N. Y.; The Revealer of Wichita, Kan.; The American Guard; Rev. Charles E. Coughlin of Royal Oak, Mich.; Dr. G. B. Winrod of Kansas; George W. Christians of Chattanooga, Tenn.; James True of Washington, D. C.; Robert Edward Edmondson of N. Y., AND GENERAL GEORGE VAN HORN MOSELEY AND SENATOR ROBERT R. REYNOLDS

Of General Moseley "Life" says: "He made a bitter anti-New Deal outburst on his retirement last year." SO—you are anti-Semitic if you are against the New Deal. Q.E.D.: THE NEW DEAL IS JEWISH-COMMUNIST:

That 22,000 attendance of anti-Jews at Madison Square Garden recently, plus many Red-Jew violence incidents in N. Y. City before and after, that are omitted from the jewspapers, prove that the Big Town has become JEW-CONSCIOUS.

"Life" is in the same classification as the "tycoon magazine" "Fortune"; is managed by the Larsen-Luce crowd of "Time," and carries the following fine old American names as staff members on Page 90, March 6, 1939: Joseph Kastner, A. Heiskell, R. Ruhl, B. Shrife, Rachel Albertson, David Cort, Bernard Hoffman, Albert Eisenstadt.

To any open intelligent mind, "Life" exposes its hand, as well as its ignorance (?) of the Communist-Fascist matter at the beginning by diversively declaring: "There is one profound difference which makes Fascism a far greater menace to America than Communism." Communism is a frank proposition to change America's whole Way of Life * * * but Fascism begins as a call to fearful men to unite against clutching enemies."

Compare the foregoing sophistry with the following bullseye from Columnist Mark Sullivan — as published in the N. Y. Herald Tribune (9-20-38): "In any country where Communism goes far enough, the next development is sure. The Fascist principle rises to neutralize Communism. If America resists Communism, IT NEED NOT FEAR FASCISM."

In addition to that, "Life" quotes as high authority for its production the notorious Rev. L. M. Birkhead, Kansas City churchman who takes expensive trips abroad and at home smelling out Jew-Expose agencies which are putting revolutionary internationalists on the spot.

Reputation-Destroyer "Life" seeks to arouse class hatred against the patriotic agencies it "blacklists" by using methods outlined by the Jewish Institution For Propaganda Analysis, notably in saying: "Each (agency) derives its inspiration and guidance, IF NOT ITS PAY, from a foreign government."

So far as I personally am concerned, "Life" lies on most of the counts listed. I believe the other patriots mentioned would "sign that" refutation. When "Life" Jews say in one breath that they have bankrupted Germany by their International Boycott on it for expelling Jew-Communists, and in the next proclaim that Hitler is financing all the Fascists, anyone with a grain of common sense will explode with hilarity.

"Facts of Record are few" about these agencies, remarks "Life." My own journalistic record is known to more than ten million people in the U. S. A. and elsewhere.

We American patriots would like nothing better than to stand up before the Dies Committee and turn our pockets inside out. Dickstein twice backed down, after summoning me before his "Nazi-Exposure" Committee.

One last word to "Life": Thanks for the publicity! Any kind is better than none! We patriots can't yet strike off the chains from The Press; but coming events are casting their shadows before. Controllers of the press won't let the public know the other side. That is suppression.

We patriots are going to force you to publicize us. We know how to goad you into committing overt acts, AND WE'RE GOING TO DO IT.

Thanks particularly for lining us up with General Moseley and Senator Reynolds. We are glad you put us in the proper class.

"LOOK" IMITATES "LIFE"

"Look" of 2-28-39 imitates "Life," and says: "Robert Edward Edmondson aspires to be America's Goebbels. He has no organization, but busies himself distributing Fascist propaganda."

No, Edmondson "aspires" to nothing but the Salvation of The Republic; but he admits that, as dictator of a properly financed "ad-less" national daily newspaper he could, with such power publicly LIBERATE FORCES WHICH WOULD EFFECT EMANCIPATION WITHIN SIX MONTHS.

MARK TWAIN'S INDICTMENT OF JEWS

(The following was broadcast in the U. S. by Edmondson Bulletin of Jan. 3, 1939:)

Mark Twain, the famous author (Samuel Clemens in private life), it has been alleged by Jews, was pro-Jewish. However that may be, his daughter married a Jew, the Russian-born pianist Ossip Gabrilowitsch (Salamonovitch). Occasionally the humorist wrote in a jocular way about the Jews; but in the March, 1898, issue of Harper's Magazine, under the heading "Concerning The Jews," he compiled a devastating analysis of Jew activities, which article was reproduced in a volume entitled "The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg" and other stories by Mark Twain, 1900 copyright. The last edition of this book was issued in 1928, copyrighted by Mrs. Gabrilowitsch—AND THE ARTICLE "CONCERNING THE JEWS" WAS DELETED. From the article published in Harper's Magazine in 1898 the following extracts are taken in review:

"Can fanaticism alone account for this ("Jewish Persecution")? It is now my conviction that it is responsible for hardly any of it. In this connection I call to mind Genesis, Chapter XLVII. We have all read the story of the years of plenty and the years of famine in Egypt, and how Joseph, with that opportunity MADE A CORNER IN BROKEN HEARTS, AND THE CRUSTS OF THE POOR, AND HUMAN LIBERTY—a corner whereby he took the nation's money all away, to the last penny; took a nation's livestock all away, to the last hoof; took a nation's land away, to the last acre. Then took the nation itself, buying it for bread, man by man, woman by woman, child by child, till ALL WERE SLAVES; a corner which took everything, left nothing; a corner so stupendous that, by comparison with it, the most gigantic corners

in subsequent history are but baby things; for it dealt in hundreds of millions of bushels, and its profits were reckoned by hundreds of millions of dollars, and it was a disaster so crushing that its effects have not wholly disappeared from Egypt today, more than 3000 years after the event.

JEWISH CHARACTER FORMATION

Was Joseph establishing a character for his race which would survive long in Egypt, and in time would his name be familiarly used to express that character—like Shylock's? IT IS HARDLY TO BE DOUBTED. Let us remember that this was CENTURIES BEFORE THE CRUCIFIXION!

"I wish to come down 1800 years later, and refer to a remark made by one of the Latin historians . . . The substance of that remark was this: Some Christians were persecuted in Rome through error, they being 'MISTAKEN FOR JEWS!' The meaning seems plain. These pagans had nothing against Christians, but they were quite ready to persecute Jews. For some reason they hated a Jew BEFORE they even knew what a Christian was. May I not assume that persecution of Jews is a thing which ANTEDATES CHRISTIANITY, AND WAS NOT BORN OF CHRISTIANITY- I think so.

"In the U. S. cotton states, after the war . . . The Jew came down in force ("carpetbaggers"?), set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the negroes' wants on credit, and at the end of the season was proprietor of the negro's share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.

"The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm—LIKE JOSEPH.

"In the England of John's time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria about a couple of centuries later.

"In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, The Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. EVEN TO GET RICH. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, BUT NOT FOR THE OTHER NINE.

"Protestants have persecuted Catholics—BUT THEY DID NOT TAKE THEIR LIVELIHOODS AWAY FROM THEM. Catholics have persecuted Protestants—BUT THEY NEVER CLOSED AGRICULTURE AND THE HANDICRAFTS AGAINST THEM. I feel convinced that the crucifixion has not much to do with the world's attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are older than that event.

JEWISH MONOPOLY IN GERMANY

"In Berlin a few years ago I read a speech which frankly urged THE EXPULSION OF THE JEWS FROM GERMANY. And the agitator's reason

was this: 'Eighty-five per cent of the successful lawyers of Berlin were Jews; and that about the same percentage of the great businesses of all sorts in Germany were IN THE HANDS OF THE JEWS.' THE MOTIVE OF PERSECUTION STANDS OUT AS CLEAR AS DAY. In Vienna an agitator said those details were true of Austria-Hungary.

"I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome; HE HAS BEEN AT IT EVER SINCE. His success has made the whole human race his enemy.

"You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Encyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the U. S. was 250,000 I wrote the editor, and explained to him I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that in my country, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint of 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have AN IMMENSE JEWISH POPULATION IN AMERICA. I am assured by men competent to speak that IEWS ARE EXCEEDINGLY ACTIVE IN POLITICS.

"Will persecution of the Jew ever come to an end? On the score of religion, I think it has already come to an end. On the score of race prejudice and trade, I have the idea that it will continue. Race prejudice is no particular matter. Jewish persecution is not a religious passion. IT IS A BUSINESS PASSION."

EDMONDSON ANSWERS MISS THOMPSON'S QUERIES

I take pleasure in truthfully answering queries submitted by Miss Dorothy Thompson, so far as lies within my power, in the following "open letter" of March 8, 1939:

"Dear Miss Thompson:

Although you have not seen fit, in your letter of March 3, to enable me to reply to my correspondents with original-source-information about yourself, I herewith gladly comply with your requests. Taking up the paragraphs of your communication seriation:

(1) For your enlightenment, an Investment-Economist and a Public Relations Counsel (both of which appear as titles on my letterhead), are directly concerned in root causes in American Economic and Political fields—which have been invaded and wrecked by Jews; over 2900 of them listed in Who's Who in American Jewry as foreign-born—all evidently summoned to this "Promised Land" by other Jews born here who have made it A Milking Pot instead of assimilating into integral Americanism's socialled Melting Pot.

Consequently, the Brandeis-Frankfurter-Morgenthau-Baruch Jewish "School of Thought" is now dominating the politico-economic affairs of the nation with an alien and anti-American "Way of Life" that is destroying The Republic by trying to substitute for it the rabbi-promulgated "Thoroughly Socialized Democracy"—described in Webster's Dictionary as "Social Democracy," THE COMMUNISM OF RUSSIA.

(2) It would be physically impossible, in the first place, to furnish you with a list of the names of the patriots who finance my publications because they reach from the Atlantic to the Pacific Coasts, and from the Great Lakes to

the Gulf of Mexico, and are the great middle class of The Republic. Absolutely no Hitler-Mussolini financing has been received. However, such would be as acceptable as were the German volunteers George Washington welcomed into his Libration Army at the birth of the Republic.

In the second place, to send YOU such names would be the act of a Judasbetrayer—as you are apparently allied with those whom I regard as enemies of my country.

You point out that "Who's Who" doesn't provide ANY data about me. That is correct. Since my Jew-exposure bulletins, with my complete record (including a real-likeness-photo), are known among over 10,000,000 Americans—so many more than Who's Who's circulation—I did not think it necessary to BUY SPACE in Who's Who. It pleases me very much to have confirmation, in the first sentence of your letter, as to the "widespread publicity" I am giving to the cause of patriotism.

If you ask for it, I'll send you a copy of letter from fromer President David Brown of the American Hebrew, wherein, after stating that he had exhaustively investigated my record, he was forced to give me "a clean bill of health" professionally and otherwise, excepting my "poisonous" Jewish Anti-Americanism documents.

HOW KEY JEWS RULE THE U. S. A. From Edmondson Bulletin of March 13, 1939)

In this pamphlet is presented "Key Jews" resident in America, prominently appearing in the public press. Most of checking for accuracy has been in "Who's Who in American Jewry"—although certain important U. S. Jews have been omitted from that big book for some mysterious reason, while France's Blum, Russia's Finkelstein-Litvinoff, Britain's Hore Belisha, Mexico's Trotsky and other foreign Jews have been listed in this "American" Jewish "honor-Roll."

Count of the Jews listed in the Jewish Who's Who shows that it contains over 2900 who were born abroad. The first point to keep in mind in this connection is that these foreign-born Jews have attained the status very quickly of "KEYS," or they would not be incorporated in this cream list.

The second vital point to hold in mind is that Jews will not assimilate and become an integral part of Americanism, but remain a notorius "Jewish Solidarity Forever," which is essentially a Nation within a Nation.

The question arises: If Jewish Religious PRACTICES are a menace to the peace and safety of the state, isn't the U. S. Supreme Court Mormon decision a religious precedent for Jewry's expulsion from America—just as is the Asiatic Exclusion Act a "racial" precedent?

Like other members of their Tribe, these foreign born Jews promptly "settle upon the glands" of our American System as Educator Jews, Doctor Jews, Lawyer Jews, Legislator Jews, Political Jews, Social Worker Jews, Publicity Jews, Economic Jews, Financial Jews, Movie Jews, Radio Jews, and Government Jews—parasitically eating out the sustenance we have created. In short, instead of regarding America as the Melting Pot of Humanity, they make it the Milking Pot for International Jewry.

The great influx of foreign-born revolutionary Jews, upon analysis, is shown to be chiefly from Russia, Poland, Hungary, Rumania and Austria, called "Eastern Jews," viz., Tribesmen from Asia—"Mongol Jews."

Many people believe that modern Freemasonry is a Christian secret society. It will enlighten them to know that more than 1700 Jews listed in Who's Who in American Jewry are Masons—245 Thirty-Second Degree and 23 Thirty-Third Degree, which is regarded as representing "the elect." President Franklin D. Roosevelt is a 32d degree Shriner Mason. Many Rabbis are Masons. Rabbi Isaac M. Wise wrote in "The Israelite of America," of August 3, 1866: "Masonry is a Jewish institution whose history, degrees, charges, pass-words and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end."

U. S. POLITICAL "KEY-JEWS"

President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "Kev-Advisor-Jews"

Bernard M. Baruch "Unofficial President "Prince of Jewry

U. S. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter (born Austria), "Legal Master Mind," "Karl Marx Professor."

U. S. Supreme Court Justice L. D. Brandeis (retired), "Father of New Deal," says Jews are a nationality."

Henry Morgenihau, Jr. Secretary of Treasury. Federal Reserve System boss.

Herbert Feis, "key" for Secretary of State Hull (wife a Jewess), known as "Brains of State Department."

Mordecai Ezekiel, "key" for Secretary of Agriculture, author of the illegal AAA.

Nathan Margold (born Rumania), "key" for Secretary of Interior Ickes.

Isidor Lubin, "key" for Secretary Perkins of Labor Dept., aided by Leo Wolman, Cecilia Razovsky, C. E. Wyzanski, David Dubinsky, Max Zaritsky, Rose Schneiderman, Thurman Arnold and Harold Nathan "keys" for Attorney General, aided by Beni, V.

Cohen, Roosevelt's legislation-expert-framer

William C. Bullitt, Ambassador to France.

Lawrence Steinhardt, Samuel Untermyer's nephew. Ambassador to Peru.

Harry F. Guggenheim, Aeronautic Counsel.

E. A. Goldenweiser (born Russia). Federal Reserve Bank System Research Director.

Wm. M. Leiserson (born Esthonia), Chairman National Mediation Board, David I. Saposs (born Russia), National Labor Relations Board Economist

Sidney Hillman (born Lithuania) Communistic CIO backer

Jerome N. Frank, Stock Exchange Commission Director.

Nathan Strauss, Housing Authority

D. E. Lilienthal, Tennessee Valley Electric Power Authority Director.

Abe Fortas, Gen. Counsel PWA.

CONGRESSMENT

Sol Bloom of New York, Democrat.
Emanuel Celler of N. Y., Democrat.
Samuel Dickstein of N. Y., Democrat (born Russia).
Adolph Sabath of Illinois, Democrat (born Czecho-Slovakia).
M. Edelstein of N. Y., Democrat.
Leo Sacks of Pennsylvania, Democrat.

STATE GOVERNORS

Herbert H. Lehman of N. Y., International Banker Henry Horner of Illinois, Payne Ratner of Kansas

NEW YORK "KEY-JEWS"

Mayor F. H. LaGuardia.
Postmaster Albert Goldman.
Stanley M. Isaacs, President Manhattan Borough.
Samuel Fassler, Building Commissioner, born Austria.
Park Commissioner Robert H. Moses.

HIDGES

Julian W. Mack, Edgar H. Lauer, Alfred Frankenthaler, Louis Goldstein, Louis B. Brodsky (born Russia), Louis A. Abrams, Bernard L. Shientag, Isidor Wasservogel, Aaron Steuer, Edward B. Koch, J. Sidney Bernstein, Jacob Panken (born Russia.) Nathan

D. Perlman (born Poland), Anna M. Kross (born Russia), Samuel I. Rosenman, Samuel Mandelbaum (born Poland), G. M. Moskowitz, Louis L. Cohen, Peter A. Abeles (born Rumania), Max Salomon, Justice Wise Politzer, Isidor I. Haber, Morris Eder, Irving Ben Cooper (born London), Morris Rothenberg (born Estonia), Charles Solomon, Jacob Eilperin, Lester Lazarus, Abraham Goldman, Charles Marks, Joseph M. Proskauer, Irwin Untermyer, Alfred Cohen, Edward Lazansky, Mark Rudich (born Rumania).

"AMERICAN" LABOR PARTY

Executive Committee of 50 includes these names: Joseph Breslau (born Russia): Meyer Bernstein, Joseph E. Brill, David Dubinsky (born Poland), J. J. Bambrick, Abe Chatman, Myer C. Finestone, Nathan Frankel, Harry Greenberg, Louis Hendon, Sidney Hillman (born Lithuania), Julius Hochman, Louis Hollender (born Poland), Abe Mendelwitz, Abraham Miller, Isador Nagel (born Poland), Samuel Permutter, Jacob S. Potosofsky, (born Russia), Alex Rose (born Poland, Secretary), Emil Schlesinger, Rose Schneidermann (born Russia), Samuel Schorr, Nathaniel Spector, Louis Waldman (born Russia), Meyer Weinstein, Samuel Wolchok, Max Zaritsky (born Russia), Chas. Zimmerman, S. M. Blinken, Samuel Noll. (Mayor F. H. LaGuardia of N. Y. City, is enrolled as a member of The "American" Labor Party).

THE AMERICAN PRESS "KEY JEWS"

Scholem Asch (born Poland), Rabbi Lewis Browne (born England), Conrad Bercovici (born Rumania), John Cournos (born Russia), Rabbi Solomon B. Freehof (born England), Waldo Frank, Montague Glass, Arthur Guitermann (born Austria), Henry H. Klein (born Hungray), Ludwig Lewisohn (born Rumania), Rabbi Lee J. Levinger, Maurice Samuel (born Rumania), Geo. Seldes, Sidney Herschell Small, Rosika Schwimmer (born Hungray), Louis Untermyer.

JOURNALISTS

F. P. Adams, Alter Brody (born Russia), Benj. de Casseres, Edna Ferber, Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Maurice Hindus, W. B. Ziff, Fanny Hurst, Ben Hecht, Geo. S. Kaufman, Emil Ludwig-Cohen (born Germany), Walter Lippmann, David Lawrence, Louis Lipsky, Eugene Lyons (born Russia), Isaac F. Marcosson, Rabbi Samuel Margoshes (born Galicia), Charles Michaelson, Rabbi Lewis I. Newman, M. J. Olgin (born Russia); Bernard Postal, Joseph Pulitzer, Dorothy Parker, Louis Rittenberg (born Hungray). M. S. Rukeyser, Morrie Ryskind, Marcus Eli Ravage (born Rumania), Geo. E. Sokolsky, Philip Slomovitz, (born Russia), John L. Spivak, Herbert Bayard Swope, Walter Winchell, James Waterman Wise, Frederick William Wile, Max Winkler (born Rumania), Morris Fishbein (editor of American Medical Journal).

PUBLISHERS

Moses Annenberg of Philadelphia (born Prussia): David A. Brown, of Dettoit; Lowell Brentano, of New York; Paul Block; J. H. Biben, of New York; Abraham Cahan, of New York (born Russia): Levand Bros., of Kansas; Adler Chain, in Northwest; Eugene Meyer, Jr., of Washington, D. C.; Arthur G. Newman, of New York Journal; Liberty's Bernarr McFadden of N. Y.; J. David Stern, of New York; Arthur Hays Sulzberger, of New York Times; David Schapiro, of New York (born Poland). The editorial departments of the newspapers are controlled chiefly through Jewish advertising influence. Many Jews are in the Asso, Press and United Press Assn., and the Hearst papers are Jew-directed.

Wm. S. Paley, President Columbia Broadcasting System; David Sarnoff, President Radio Corporation of America, dominating National Broadcasting Co. Many individual broadcasting stations are Jewish-owned as shown by the directorates

MARCANTONIO A LIAR?

(Edmondson Bulletin March 25, 1939)

Congressman Vito Marcantonio made the following speech on the floor of The House Feb. 3, 1939, against extension of the Dies Committee investigation of Communism—and lost. In that delivery he remarked (see Congressional Record):

"The two MOST VICIOUS ANTI-SEMITES in America are Robert Edward Edmondson and James True. Edmondson will be remembered as the man who was arrested under charges of criminal libel brought by Mayor LaGuardia and other leading citizens of New York. He is best known as the most prolific writer of anti-Semitic literature, according to a University of

Chicago study by D. S. Strong, published last year; and in recognition of this fact has been invited several times to speak before the Nazi Bund in N. Y. City. Again, in the case of Edmondson, anti-Semitism and anti-New Dealism are brought together in the person of Howland Spencer, EDMONDSON'S CHIEF BACKER."

In order to set the record straight, I wrote March 11 as follows to Marcantonio:

"As reported by the Congressional Record of Feb. 3, 1939, your speech opposing the extension of the anni-Communist investigations of the Dies Committee made the following statements:

"(1) That the undersigned is a vicious anti-Semite;

"(2) That 'a University of Chicago study published last year showed the undersigned to be the most prolific anti-Semitic writer;

"(3) That 'Edmondson's chief backer is Howland Spencer, Hudson River aristocrat."

(4) That I was arrested under charges of criminal libel brought by Mayor LaGuardia of New York and other prominent New Yorkers.'

Webster's Dictionary defines "vicious" as "addicted to vice or morally corrupted in principles or conduct." That would be libelously actionable, uttered "off The Floor," being false.

From the University of Chicago Press the following was received by the Edmondson Agency: "THIS IS NOT OUR PUBLICATION." Further investigations developed a letter of March 7, signed by D. S. Strong, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, saying: "Marcantonio ERRED in stating that this study had been published. It exists only in the form of a few typewritten copies, one of which I lent the Congressman."

The following letter has been received from Howland Spencer, dated March 7, 1939:

"Dear Mr. Edmondson:

"Replying to your leter of March 4, 1939. This letter will be authority for my statement that I never contributed one dollar to the Edmondson Jew-Exposure Patriotic Crusade; my only contributions being articles reprinted from the Highland Post under the pen-name "Squire of Krum Elbow," for the printing of which I personally paid, and which circulars were distributed through the medium of the Edmondson Service."

The foregoing speaks for itself. Does this make Marcantonio a deliberate

Marcantonio told half the truth and misrepresented the technical prosecution. The charge read: "The People of The State of New York Against Robert Edward Edmondson," having been brought by a Jewish-Majority Grand Jury for "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion." But Marcantonio "forgot" to say that the court unconditionally dismissed the charge May 10, 1938, "in furtherance of justice." Marcantonio knew about this, but failed to tell the whole truth to his colleagues of The House, thereby laying himself open to the suspicion of trying to mislead them in an important action.

"American Labor Party, born N. Y. City, Dec. 10, 1902, lawyer" is the complete information about himself Marcantonio supplied to the Congressional Directory of January, 1939.

But we have looked up Marcantonio's record elsewhere. It smells Communistically Kosher throughout. "American Labor Party" membership involves obedience to its Executive Council, which is composed mostly of Jews.

Marcantonio is "National President of the International Labor Defense," branded "Red" by the Dilling Red Network book of radicals. SASHA Small, Publication Director, sends out literature of the organization. On his letterhead appear 22 Jewish out of 39 other names, some of which may also be Jewish.

I understand this New Dealer loose-talker not only denies he is Jewish,

PROOF OF CONSPIRACY TO COMMUNIZE U.S.A.

The following letter of March 22, 1939, from Robert Edward Edmondson is self-explanatory:

Hon, Martin Dies,

Chairman, Committee Investigating un-Americanism.

Washington, D. C.

Dear Congressman Dies:

I have been informed that you are being importuned to summon me before your Committee to investigate reports, viz.: (1) I am a "Nazi Spy" hiding out in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania (half a mile from Pennsylvania Highway No. 115); that (2) My power-publicity exposing Jewish communizing of The Republic is financed by Hitler Germany; that (3) I am working for a Fascist Dictatorship of America; and that (4) I ought to be deported at once.

It would give me unalloyed pleasure to appear before your Committee any time anywhere, and tell The Truth, THE WHOLE TRUTH, and Nothing but The Truth, as to my exposures of the Jewish Politico-Economic System's plans and acts to wreck America through communization.

As "publicity is the only cure" for this public evil—Jewish anti-Americanism—and as daily papers are under Jewish-advertising and other coercive control, little good would be accomplished by distortion or suppression of testimony. Hence, I have hitherto regarded "hearings," etc., as more or less of little effect.

If we could get broadcast publicity in this case, the result would be highly beneficial; otherwise, it would be largely a waste of your and my precious time, energy and reprehensible waste of taxpayers' money.

However, it has occurred to me that, if you are undecided as to subpoenaing me, it might be a good plan to acquaint you now with the nature of my testimony; and I therefore submit below, in question and answer form, points of interest as I envision them and your requirements:

TESTIMONY ON FOMONDSON CRUSADE

Do you swear to tell the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But The Truth?

I do and will, if the Committee will let me.

What is your name, age and residence?

Robert Edward Edmondson, Stoddartsville, Penna. Born Dayton, Ohio, 1872; of pre-revolution Virginia ancestry; 40 years in politico-economic journalism.

What is your present business?

Promoting patriotic power-publicity exposing the treasonable conspiracy of the anti-national Jewish Politico-Economic System that is seeking to over-throw The American System and substitute therefor the rabbi-proclaimed "thoroughly Socialized Democracy," which is Communistic.

How long have you been circulating publications on that subject; Since 1933.

How many have been distributed?

The Edmondson Associates have been instrumental in having printed, and republished and circulated over five million, reaching more than 10,000,000 people, from coast to coast. I have no formal organization.

What is the source of the information published?

Books, pamphlets, testimony, legal documents and other suppressed publications, including amazing Jewish confessions of aspirations and acts toward world power—from England, France, Italy, Germany, Arabia, China, Siberia, Sweden, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Japan, India, New Zealand and the United States.

What is the nature and object of your publicity?

Educational Jew-exposure, to liberate the Republic from Jewish domination. Leaflets are designed to enlighten leadership, and fortify it with facts showing that the solution of the Jewish Problem in America is economic—to be achieved by ballots, not bullets.

Do not racial-religious constitutional guarantees prohibit anti-Jewish action such as you are taking?

No. For its own self-preservation the Constitution must obviously require its citizen-supporters to defend it against enemies within, as well as without, who prostitute the state endowments into license that "imperils its own existence as a constitutional state"—using the words of the U. S. Supreme Court regarding Communistic subversions.

FEAR OF JEWISH BLACKMAIL

How many contributor-subscribers have you?

I do not know. By request, no regular record has been kept aside from that essential to tax requirements. The patriotic service is a sort of chain-affair, with contribution subscriptions irregular.

You say your leaflets are supplied at cost. What do you mean by that?

One cent is calculated to approximately cover labor, materials, supplies, printing, transportation and such operation-expenses.

What is your salary?

None. Not even a "drawing account." Edmondson capital to the extent of \$20,000 has been sunk in this non-profit patriotic crusade to fill the gaps left by unavoidable deficits. I have regarded it as a privilege to make such a gift to my country.

Have you received any large contributions?

No. I do not recall any over \$100; very few over \$20. Most of them are anonymous, and impossible to trace to source, except in the case of requests for \$1 to \$5 literature-orders. Only volunteer contributions are acceptable. There is no specific solicitation.

What have you to say regarding the report that Hitler-Nazi funds are financing your campaign?

To the best of my knowledge and belief I have never received a dollar contribution from such sources, directly or indirectly. Without hesitation, I would gratefully accept any unconditional offering to preserve American liberties—whose preservation is worth any sacrifice.

Do you favor Nazism or Fascism for America?

Absolutely NO. I am an American Vigilante Patriot, not a German Nazi Patriot, nor an Italian Fascist Patriot. My public and private record on this point is unimpeachable. I have repeatedly proclaimed that I stand irrevocably for traditional individualistic Americanism for America, as against collectivism, regimentation or any other foreign ideology.

Why do you attack Jews in preference to Communism?

Communism is an effect. The Jews cause Communism. They introduced it to the world via Russia. Their leaders seek to Communize Gentiles. The Jewish Plan does not contemplate Communism for Jews.

Jews call you an anti-Semite. Why?

JEWS HIDE BEHIND RACE AND RELIGION

Because they hide behind Race, just as they do behind Religion. Arabs belong to the Semite race. If you are anti-Semitic you are anti-Arab as well as anti-Jew. I am not against Arabs. They take the stand I do, viz.: Their Nationalist Leader says: "We turn against the Jews, not because they are Jews (or Semites), but because they threaten our existence."

Has your agency ever been investigated by the authorities?

Yes, by the Department of Justice and the Post Office.

With what result?

Both admitted that I was merely exercising my constitutional right of Freedom of Press. My mail has never been denied transportation by the postal authorities.

Has any attempt been made to stop your campaign otherwise?

Yes. A N. Y. City Jewish-majority Grand Jury, instigated by Jewish Mayor LaGuardia, indicted me in 1936 on a charge of "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion," everywhere, dead or alive, including themselves. The court unconditionally dismissed the charge May 10, 1938, specifically declaring that my work contained no incitement to breach of the peace. I have never attacked the Jewish Religion as such in my Jew-Communist exposures, which centered against politico-economic monopoly-power.

You claim that a Jewish Conspiracy is trying to destroy The Republic and

other nations. What is your authority?

The Record

Suppressed historical documents prove it. They show that Jewish revolutionaries wrecked Russia, and that the Soviets are now ruled by Kaganowitch-Finkelstein-Litvinoff-Maisky Jews thru Gentile Front Stalin, wedded to a Jewess. Confirmation is found in the writings of British Correspondent-Resident-in-Russia Victor Marsden, who reported Lenin married a Jewess; British Author Wickham Steed, of "Through Thirty Years;" New Zealand Author A. N. Field; English Editor-Author A. S. Leese. "The Moment," Jewish Soviet publication, was quoted in a U. S. Jewish weekly as saying: "L. M. Kaganowitch will one day rule over Russia. His sister is Stalin's wife." The British White Paper of April 1, 1919, reported: "Bolshevism is organized and worked by Jews." The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919, said: "The ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism." The American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920, said: "What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities are tending to produce in other countries." London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy wrote in "The World Significance of the Russian Revolution" by Pitt-Rivers: "Jewish elements provide the driving power for both Capitalism and Communism." Zionst Leader Herzl admits in "The

Jewish State" that: When we Jews sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat; when we rise, there arises also our terrible power of the purse." The American Patriotic Coalition reported to Congress Dec. 29, 1934: "The communist movement in the U. S. is an alien conspiracy." It is treason.

Do you hold that Jews wrote "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of

Zion?

I am not concerned with such authenticity any more than I am concerned with whether or not Benjamin Franklin actually delivered a prophetic denunciation of Jewry at the birth of The Republic. America is concerned with the fact that JEWS have put into effect such "protocolic" edicts in Europe and the U. S. The deadly parallel proves it. "Proof of prophecy lies in fulfillment."

Why do you object to Jewish championship of Democracy, which kind of

government has been praised by leaders of both the great parties?

Because Democracy and Communism are synonymous; because this country's government was founded on republican, not democracy principles. 'Democracy' does not appear either in the Declaration of Independence, nor in the Constitution. It was apparently deleted because democracies have always fallen to pieces in the past because their communistic forces automatically tend to disintegrate.

Hitler says Jews want war. Do you believe that?

Jews Promote War

I do. The record shows it. Werner Sombart, in his book: "Jews and Modern Capitalism," holds: "Wars are Jews' harvests; going on to say: "They became Lords of Money and Lords of the World." Henry Ford declared in the N. Y. World of Feb. 17, 1921: "I am convinced that nearly all wars were caused so that some one would profit. Those who have profited were International Jews. They start wars by propaganda which set one people against another. They profit before war by making munitions; during war, by loans; afterward, in a free-for-all grab." Former British Propaganda Agent Landman, a Jew, wrote in the London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. 7, 1936; "The only way to induce the American President to come into the World War was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine. The Zionists carried out their part and helped bring America into the war."

Do you know that Henry Ford "recanted" all he said about the Jews: Latest reports say his secretary "recanted" for him unauthorized.

What is your proposal for a solution of the Jewish Problem:

Disfranchisement of unassimilable Jews as a danger to the peace and safety of the state; their removal from economic monopolies and monetary domination; their purchase of the Island of Madagascar for a Jewish National Homeland State; their deportation self-paid.

Do you believe we Americans can return constitutionally to traditional

government?

I do. Enlightenment only is necessary. Once they know the trouble, citizens will remedy it "American-way." No dictatorship is needed. American wants no communism, no fascism, no nazism, no bolshevism, no democracy, in my opinion. Individualistic Americanism demands the restoration of The Republic with its principles of special privilege for none and justice for all, no more, no less. There ought to be financial avalanche support for such a tescue and restoration, reconstruction and redemption.

Yours, pro patria.

Robert Edward Common

A GENUINE MODERN "PROTOCOL" FROM A JEWISH "ELDER"

The following self-explanatory communication has just been received (April 17, 1939) from English Editor Arnold S. Leese (the British Patriot whom the Jews of England imprisoned for six months recently because he publicly exposed the anti-British activities of World Jewry—and later interned five years without formal charges).

"Dear Mr. Edmondson: In view of the immense importance of a speech made by the Jewish Poet Bialik in Palestine in 1933, and which is so little known, I have obtained the only six copies remaining of the report of this speech in a diocesan magazine of Jerusalem. I have kept one for myself, and am sending the others to five of the most genuine movements against the Jew of which I know; so that full use of Bialik's confession may be made. I have pleasure in sending one to you herewith. Bialik is now dead. His brother-in-law was Gamarnik, a Soviet Army General."

The name of this monthly magazine is "Lines of Communication," and on the title page appears: "A Diocesan Magazine of the Anglican Church in Jerusalem and Throughout the Holy Land, Transjordan, Syria and Cyprus: Editor, Archdeacon Stewart, St. George's Close, Jerusalem."

The title of the article in the July, 1933, number, is "Judaism in History—A Jewish Conception," with an introduction reading: "From an address delivered at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, on May 11, this year, by Mr. N. H. Bialik, the most famous of modern Hebrew poets."

The matter below is taken from the Bialik address, and constitutes probably the most amazing "official" confession ever published from high Jewish "religious" leadership:

To War on Gentiles

"Judaism, which was destroyed politically (as a result of the destruction of the Temple 70 A.D.), went forth into the great world. It adapted its possessions to its wanderings. I once compared it to AN ARMY GOING TO WAR—a 'movable State'

"Jews were compelled to smuggle their goods across from frontier to frontier; so they chose abstract wares, easy to smuggle; and this gave them ability, despite ghettoes and restrictions, TO ENTER EVERYWHERE; and so it is that the Hebrew people have PENETRATED EVERYWHERE.

"The argument is that Judaism, by penetrating among the Gentiles (in its Christian guise or otherwise), has gradually undermined the remnants of paganism. Such penetration has NOT been without DELIBERATE JEWISH CONNIVING in the shape of assistance bestowed in a thousand ways, devices and disguises. IT HAS BEEN EFFECTED IN GREAT MEASURE BY CRYPTO-JEWS (Secret Jews), WHO HAVE PERMEATED CHRISTIANITY AND SPOKEN THROUGH THE MOUTH OF CHRISTIANITY.

"By these devices, through Jewish will and through the power of their Jewish blood (I, too, like Hitler, believe in blood and the power of blood); and owing to an instinct for 'requital,' they have gradually induced Christianity to shed what was left in it of pagan elements; and it is they who, in principle (even though they are called by great Gentile names), are the creators of the Renaissance, of Liberalism, of Democracy, of Socialism, and of COMMUNISM.

"All this achievement * * * has come about chiefly through unknown and anonymous Jews, Jews in secret, either crypto-Jews who mingled among the Gentiles and nurtured great thinkers from among them; or, through the

influence of Jews, who, in the great crises of liberty and freedom, have stood behind the scenes; or through Jewish teachers and scholars from the time of the Middle Ages. It was disciples of Jewish teachers who headed the Protestant movements.

Calls Gentiles "These Dogs"

"THESE DOGS, these laters of Israel, have a keen nose. In truth, Jewish influence in Germany is powerful. It is impossible to ignore it. MARX WAS A JEW. His manner of thought was Jewish. His keeness of intellect was Jewish; and one of his forbears was a most distinguished rabbi endowed with a powerful mind.

"The newspapers, UNDER JEWISH CONTROL, obviously served as an auxiliary in all movements in favor of freedom. Not in vain have Jews been drawn toward journalism. In their hands IT BECAME A WEAPON HIGHLY

FITTED TO MEET THEIR NEEDS.

"The Gentiles have at last realized this secret—that Judaism has gradually penetrated and permeated them LIKE A DRUG. The Gentile nature is in revolt, and is trying to organize the final battle. Paganism is minded to organize its last war against Judaism. And there is no doubt that this warfare * * * is being waged specifically against Democracy, against Socialism. This is another worldwide warfare against the forces of Judaism. I venture to think that Socialism in its highest form is the fruit of the Jewish spirit, and the fruit of the world outlook of the prophets. It is they who were the first Socialists.

War is now being waged against us, against Judaism—not in OUR OWN LAND, but in the great outer world where we are scattered. They would smoke us out of all the cracks and crannies WHERE WE HAVE HIDDEN.

They would exterminate us like BACILLI, and be rid of us.

To any but closed minds, comment is superfluous. But to ignore the warning "protocol" of "an army going out to war" on Gentiles in the guise of secret spies, under the Oriental banner of diabolical duplicity, would be to commit suicide in the shadow of TOWERING ARROGANCE.

BANKRUPTING LIBET SHITS

The following was printed in The Jewish Spectator of April, 1939, by Rabbi Samuel Horowitz:

"One reason for the failure to silence Father Coughlin is the resigned feeling of helplessness and futility on the part of Jewish leaders. They fail to see the difference between free speech and libel. Coughlin is a dangerous demagague and vicious wolf in sheep's clothing.

"There is no way of keeping him off the radio directly. And we cannot expect his hierarchy to unfrock him, because, as an individual citizen, he has a right to free speech. There is only one effective and legal means of SILENC-

ING him—to sue him for libel.

"When a demagogue repeats his slanderous lies and ignores the truth, he is guilty of deliberate libel. Hence, all who have been libeled by him have a perfect right to sue him for libel. Thus, suing for libel for millions of dollars, ENOUGH TO CAUSE BANKRUPTCY, would prove the most effective means of SILENCING Jew-baiters."

Is this a thoughtless exposure of synagogue "morals?" Of the materialistic

philosophy of rabbinical lewry?

Here is an alleged Jewish "Man of God" proposing to suppress the free speech of a Christian "Man of God" before he is proven guilty in a court of law of misrepresentation.

Perhaps some light on this significant development will be cast by reference to "The Reflex," Jewish Magainze, November 1927, wherein it was stated: "The modern American rabbi is a man of the world. He knows and cherishes the power of money, and is adept in matter of finance, mortgages and loans."

If the foregoing does not picture MATERIALISM PERSONIFIED—what does it exemplify?

"Truth Seeks LIGHT"-nor SILENCE and Darkness!

Americans! BE YOURSELVES! Don't be a Jew-worm! You are NINETY TO ONE! Of WHAT are you afraid?

STAND UP-AND FIGHT! "All for one and one for all!"

REV. STANLEY HIGH A BIASED REPORTER (Edmondson Bulletin of June. 1939)

Faint Hearts in the patriotic defense-war against Jewish communizing ought to take courage from the first article of the Saturday Evening Post of May 27, 1939, entitled "Star Spangled Fascists," by Rev. Stanley High-sis listed in the Red Network as a proponent of the "intermixing of races."

While the article smearingly insinuates that current patriotism in Americal is chiefly of the Nazi-Fascist type, force of circumstances compels the admission that "the movement is prospering" to the point where "The Leader" will find "something to lead."

An estimate is reported that a third of all the families in America are receiving propaganda literature "of this sort"—which suggests that more than forty million Americans are becoming Jewconscious—going on to say that private and public patriotic meetings approach "astronomical figures."

"There are a number of important organizations" says High, which are dedicated exclusively to research, information and interpretation." He brands them the Fascist Brain Trust. "Prominent in this," he notes, "is Robert Edward Edmondson, who publishes American Vigilante bulletins; and, after a 1936 indictment for his attacks on the Jews, keeps out of reach of reporters."

High lies when he says Edmondson has kept out of reach of reporters.

You, Mr. High, have my address, printed on millions of Jew-exposure bulletins. You know where I am located.

Had I, as an American fairplay journalist, been writing the Post article, I would have added to "after a 1936 indictment for his attacks on the Jews," the fact that on May 10, 1938, the court unconditionally dismissed the case "in furtherance of justice," because the defendant had been merely exercising his Constitutional right of Freedom of the Press.

Instead of being forced out of New York, as rumored in some quarters, I would have added that the defendant, after waiting four months following said dismissal, to give the Jews more opportunity for further official attack, surrendered his apartment and, to enable his wife and himself to recuperate, moved to the quiet of the Pocono Mountains in Stoddartsville, Pa., where, as pledged in his May 12, 1938, pamphlet entitled "Court Dismissal Follows Jewish Backdown," he has continued to conduct his "Free Speech educational publicity against the International Jewish System that is communizing The Republic."

Had I wanted dramatic "atmosphere" for my story, I would have quoted what an unbiased outside source—Canadian National Unity Party Leader Arcand, highest Jewish Peril authority on the North American Continent—said publicly a year ago about that dismissal, viz.:

"One single patriot has forced the wealthiest and most powerful organization in the world TO DRAW BACK IN THE FACE OF TRUTH. The backdown is the first real great defeat of the World Kehillah. They refused to carry on on the very ground they themselves chose. It is an admission of defeat, jitters and incapacity greater than any court judgement could have been, for they have done the judging themselves, on law as well as on facts. The defendant emerges victor with a spotless sword from one of the greatest fights ever waged."

And had I, as an American reporter, been searching for more "human interest" I would have discovered that at no time was the Defendant Edmondson compelled to submit to the ordeal of two years of court-procedure in Jew York; that all he had to do to avoid it was to cross the Hudson River into New Jersey sanctuary—extradition laws not applying in his case; but he chose to remain and fight in "The Stronghold of International Jewry" because he believed that Truth would win through Power-Publicity exposing the law-weakness of the prosecution.

But Rev. Stanley High makes it very plain. There is NOW "something to lead!"

"Back to The Republic!"

HOW U. S. LABOR IS BOSSED Edmondson Bulletin of June 2, 1939)

American Labor: Purge Your Ranks! Be AMERICAN! You are under FOREIGN rule! Investigate your controls. They do not put Americanism FIRST!

Let us start right! The undersigned has no "racket.' He is an American patriot seeking the restoration of The Republic. He is not a wealthy capitalist. He is against the Jewish capitalistic sweat-shop system.

Matthew Woll (foreign born), is Jewish Vice-President of the American Federation of Labor in charge of its Legal Bureau, which employs as General Counsel Joseph A. Padway, Wisconsin Jew, whom the Jews' Who's Who lists as foreign-born also. Woll is said to be an Episcopalian; but so is Jewish Mayor LaGuardia of N. Y. City; and Jewish Prof. Albert Einstein says: "The Jew who abandons his faith REMAINS A JEW" (Colliers' Weekly 11-26-38).

For the C. I. O. Labor Group Jewish Lawyer Lee Pressman is General Counsel. The Jewish B'nai B'rith Messenger of Los Angeles (3-12-37) names Jewish Philanthropist Maurice Falk of Pittsburgh as the designer of the C. I. O. CIO Jewish Leader Sidney Hillman is President of the Amalgamated Clothing Worker Union, and has had the support of David Dubinsky of the International Garment Workers, and Max Zaritsky of the Hat-Cap Union—all foreign born.

"President Arthur A. Wharton of the International Assn. of Machinists, wrote a circular letter to his officials attacking the 'CIO JEWISH organizations with their red affiliates' (Daily Worker 5-25-37).

The N. Y. Times of Aug. 14,1938, printed this Washington dispatch: 'John P. Frey, vice-President, American Federation of Labor (who is credited with being the real AFL power), told the Special House Committee investigating un-American activities today that Communists hold key-positions in the

CIO. He listed 280 alleged Communists as holding such positions. He also declared the program of the CIO had the hearty endorsement of the Communist Party."

American Labor Party Key-Jewed

The American Labor Party executive committee of 50 includes mostly Jewish names.

Jewish President David Lasser of The Workers Alliance is assisted by Benjamin and other Jewish officials.

"The Comprodaily Publishing Co. (Publisher of the Communist Party Official Organ, "The Daily Worker") was incorporated April 18, 1929, with J. Louis ENGDAHL, Irving FRANKLIN and Alexander TRACHTENBERG as directors, and Isaac SCHORR, Carol WEISS KING and Fay SIEGARTEL, as incorporators and stockholders."—From the N. Y. Times, Feb. 2, 1939. Mike GOLD is chief columnist.

Isador Lubin is the American Delegate to the International Labor Bureau of the League of Nations, and in his Labor Department at Washington appear many key Jews, including, as consultants, Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., Jacob Perlman, Rose Schneidermann.

The National Labor Relations Board includes, among others, the foreign-born key-Jews David J. Saposs and Wm. M. Leiserson. Abe Fortas is Jewish General Counsel of the great PWA.

After an exhaustive investigation President E. H. Martin of the National Reform Assn., reported: "Above 90% of the Motion Picture Industry's big barons are JEWS—in fact they themselves claim 95%, and boast of it." Jew names dominate the directorates of the corporations.

Politically, the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933, has this to say: "The Roosevelt Adminstration has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration in American history"—calling Bernard M. Baruch "Unofficial President;" saying Frankfurter has great power; naming Judge Saumel I. Rosenman as "Roosevelt's Right Arm;" Ex-Justice Brandeis was regarded as "Father of the New Deal."

Be Warned, American Labor!

A NEW HELL

(From Edmondson Bulletin of June 6, 1939)

Responding to repeated requests, the undersigned below reproduces the salient features of London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy's awful tribal confession of guilt, as contained in his prefatory letter dated July, 1920, printed in "The World Significance of the Russian Revolution," by Pitt-Rivers (in New York Public Library):

"When you first handed me your MS. on 'The World Significance of The Russian Revolution,' you expressed a doubt about the propriety of its title. After a perusal of your work, I can assure you that your misgivings were entirely without foundation. No better title could have been chosen, for no event in any age will finally have more significance for our world than this one.

"The Bolshevist simply did what his father, Mr. Democrat, never dared to do. Hence, the latter's vaciliation, hypocrisy and failure; hence, the former's energy, sincerity and success. 'No movement,' you rightly say about the White Opposition, representing a heterogeneous jumble of contradictory elements, can ever defeat another movement which knows its own mind and allows of no compromise.'

"Bolshevism is a religion and a faith. How could these half-converted believers ever dream to vanquish 'the truthful' and the 'faithful' of their own creed, those holy crusaders who had gathered round the red standard of the Prophet Karl Marx; and who fought under the daring guidance of these experienced officers of all latter-day revolutions—THE JEWS?

"I am touching here on a subject which, to judge from your own pamphlet, is perhaps more interesting to you than any other. In this you are right. There is no race in the world more enigmatic, more fatal than the Jews. The question of the Jews and their influence on the world past and present, cuts to the root of all things, and should be discussed by every honest thinker. Jews are very suspicious of any Gentile who tries to approach them with a critical mind.

Jews Control Capitalism Communism

"You point out, with fine indignation, the great danger that springs from the prevalence of Jews in finance and industry, and from the preponderance of Jews in rebellion and revolution. You reveal the connection between the collectivism of the immensely rich International Finance—and the International Collectivism of Karl Marx and Trotsky—the Democracy of and by decoy-cries. And all this evil and misery, the economic as well as the political, you trace back to one source—THE JEWS.

Now, other Jews may villify and crucify you for these outspoken views. I myself shall abstain from joining the chorus of condemnation. First of all I have to say this: There is scarcely an event in modern Europe that cannot be traced back to the Jews. Take the Great War that appears to have come to an end. Ask yourself what were its causes and reasons.

Are Jews not the inventors of the Chosen People Myth? And is not this obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation?

"All latter-day ideas and movements have originally sprung from a Jewish source for the simple reason that the Semitic idea has finally conquered—CONQUERED THROUGH CHRISTIANITY, which, as Disraeli pointed out long ago, is nothing but 'Judaism for the people.'

"Now, Democracy pretends to proclaim everybody free and equal. It was therefore bound to destroy the bond between master and servant; and it replaced it by the bond of wages and salaries. Democracy, as we all know, abolished slavery—that natural slavery in which the master took an interest in his slaves because they were part of his most valuable property. But it reintroduced it in the form of wage typranny—by means of which the 'freed' serf could be freely exploited. Thus ended this glorious liberty principle of the reformation and the revolution—the finest theory that has even been invented for the most miserable of practices that have ever defiled this world. No doubt the Jews are responsible for this, because they are the spiritual fathers of Democracy.

Jews Victims of Their Own Practices

"No, you are not a vulgar—you are a very enlightened critic of our race. For there is an anti-Semitism which does the Jews more justice than any blind philo-Semitism, than does that merely sentimental 'let-them-all-come Liberalism,' which in itself is nothing but the Semitic Ideology over again.

"You have noticed with alarm that the Jewish elements provide the driving forces for both Communism and Capitalism, for the material as well as the spiritual ruin of this world. From Moses to Marx, in practice and in theory, in idealism and in materialism, in philosophy and in politics, they are today just what they have always been—passionately devoted to their aims and purposes.

"But these visions are all wrong' you will reply. Look where they have led the world. Think, have they not had a fair trial of 300 years. How much longer are you going to recommend them to us, and inflict them upon us?"

"To this question I have only one answer. It is this: "YOU ARE RIGHT!" This reproach is only too well justified, and upon this common ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you, and defend you against any accusation of promoting race hatred.

"If you are an Anti-Semite, I, the Semite, am an Anti-Semite too, and a much more fervent one than ever you are. We have erred, my friend, we have grievously erred.

Jews The World's Executioners

"We, who have posed as the saviours of the world; we, who have even boasted of having given it 'the Saviour'—we are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners. We, who have promised to lead you to a New Heaven, we have finally succeeded in landing you into a New Hell.

"There has been no progress, least of all moral progress. And it is just our morality which has prohibited all real progress. I look at this world and I shudder at its ghastliness—I shudder all the more, as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness.

"There is hope, my friend, for we are still here; our last word is not yet spoken; our last deed is not yet done; our last revolution is not yet made. This last revolution, the revolution that will crown our revolutionary work, will be the revolution against the revolutionaries. It is bound to come.

"And when that great day has broken, when the values of Death and Decay are put into the melting-pot to be changed into those of Power and Beauty, then you, my dear Pitt-Rivers, the descendant of an old and distinguished Gentile family, may be assured to find by your side, and as our faithful ally, at least one member of that Jewish Race which has fought with fatal success upon all the spiritual battlefields.

"Yours against the revolution, and for life ever flourishing,

(signed) OSCAR LEVY July, 1920 London, England

Down the corridor of history has never come a greater confession of guilt, a more powerful Jeremiad, a more impressive document, a more convincing testament. For it, Levy was exiled from his home by his tribe.

CHRISTIAN CENTURY "ALL WET"

Open Letter of July 6, 1939, To Charles Clayton Morrison Editor, Christian Century, Chicago

"Two months ago, one of the most notorious Jew-baiters in the United States, Robert Edward Edmondson, published a bulletin entitled 'Hail Moseley.' Edmondson is the man who, under the guise of running an investors service with a New York address, covered the country with such scurrilous attacks on the Jews that Mayor LaGuardia stepped in to bring him to trial for slander. Only the plea of Jewish organizations induced the Mayor to drop the case. Edmondson now operates from a Pennsylvania base. The most dangerous element in the Moseley campaign is its Anti-Semitism. * * * Gen. Moseley should

be court-martialed and disciplined." (Editorial from The CHRISTIAN Century of Chicago, a weekly self-described as "undenominational," June 14, 1939,

issue.)

My attention has been directed to (presumably) your "entangling-alliance" editorial comment quoted above, first by Rev. Harold W. Wager, Minister First Methodist Church of Pierre, S. D., in a letter of June 14, 1939, wherein he remarked: "Read the article in the June 14, 1939, issue of The Christian Century, and you will discover what thinking people think of you. * * * Repent before it is too late."

Rev. Wager concludes his diatribe with a rather cryptic and amusing postscript, reading: "I think it would be wise for you to trace back your I'amily Tree for several centuries to make sure there are no Jews to be found." I haven't yet informed the reverend gentlemen that my genealogy reportedly goes back to "Robert of Scotland" in the Eighth Century. If he was a Jew, then I'm a Chinaman.

But, let's get on with this matter, and reproduce, secondly, what Dr. William H. Anderson, General Secretary of the American Christian Alliance, N. Y. City, has to say in his letter to you of June 16—he having sent me a copy:

The Christian Century "Wholly Wet"

"I strongly suspect that you do not relish a showing that you are wrong in your facts or mistaken in your judgment * * respecting the Moseley editorial in June 14 Christian Century.

"My understanding and belief is that much of Mr. Edmondson's material is made up of quotations from Jewish sources. He insists emphatically that he is not opposed to the Jews, or any Jew, for any religious or racial reason; but opposes subversive activities by Jewish Internationalism. I have become fairly well acquainted with him, and I have a very high opinion of his intelligence, and implicit confidence in his integrity and sincerity.

"You are badly mixed and your information is pathetically fragmentary. The truth of the matter is that the Edmondson Case bade fair to become one of the most notable, it not the outstanding case involving Freedom of Speech, in the history of this country, if not in the world; for it was unquestionably intended to convict and imprison Mr. Edmondson, with the help of a packed jury, after finally indicting him by action of a Grand Jury composed of a majority of Jews.

"The truth is that Mr. LaGuardia did the practically unprecedented thing as Mayor of New York, of issuing his own warrant as 'Chief Magistrate,' for the arrest of Mr. Edmondson—a cheap, dirty political trick to clinch the Jewish vote for his re-election. And I said that much in writing to Mr. LaGuardia, who knows me very well.

"You are wholly 'wet' in your statement: 'Only the plea of Jewish organizations induced the Mayor to drop the case.' The case had passed entirely out of Mayor La-Guardia's hands long before it was even decided to drop it. IT GOT TOO HOT TO HANDLE.

"Mr. Edmondson fortunately had a modest competence, enough to defend himself. One of the things done which caused 'wailing and gnashing of teeth in Zion' was to subpoena about 25 leading Jews, to be put on the stand for the defense, and confront them with certain things. After that, the plan to railroad Mr. Edmondson cooled off.

"Jewish organizations intervened as 'friends of the court' and set out what Mr. LaGuardia must have known, viz., that there is under American law no such a thing as racial libel. They set out that the net result would react against the Jews. And that is a monumental understatement, for this case would have gone to the U. S. Supreme Court and SET THE COUNTRYSIDE ON FIRE."

Case Unconditionally Dismissed

I of course do not know how you "took" Dr. Anderson's truthful account; but I will add that the case was unconditionally dismissed May 10, 1938, "in furtherance of justice," the official decision of which added the publications of the defendant had "never caused a breach of the peace in the community—nor are they apt to."

Dr. Anderson is entirely correct in informing you that my removal from New York to Pennsylvania was dictated by the necessity for health-recuperation on the part of my wife, as well as myself, following a two-year court strain, pro patria; and I am carrying out my pledge made at the time of dismissal, viz.: "The defendant will continue his Free Speech educational publicity, NOT against any religion or race, but against the International Jewish Socialism that is Communizing The Republic—for only The Truth can set us free."

I am given to understand that The Chrisitian Century is one of "the most LIBERAL of the Protestant organizations." In respect to my own case, judging from the editorial quoted at the beginning of this bulletin, it has—not to use the short and ugly word—"liberalized" The Truth in a most amazing un-Christian manner. Did you know that Ludwig Lewisohn, leading Jewish author, in his new book "The Answer," says "THE JEWS ORIGINATED Liberalism?" Don't you know that your epithet "scurrilous" is a typical product of the Jewish Master Factory? And I am "Anti-Jew," not "Anti-Semitic."

I want none of that liberal brand of so-called Christian Charity—which recalls the historic words of Martin Luther, greatest Protestant—also the most prominent 'anti-Semite' of his time—when he proclaimed that "Were God willing to give me no other Messiah than he whom the Jews desire, I would rather be a sow than a man."

You attacked the Jewish Religion AS SUCH—which I never did, for I concentrated on Jewry's politico-economic communizing—in your issue of

Dec. 1, 1937, when you exclaimed, anti-Jewishly:

"Judaism rests upon an IMPOSSIBLE BASIS. It tries to pluck the fruits of democracy WITHOUT YIELDING ITSELF to the processes of democracy. Democracy cannot guarantee our Jewish brethren against the emergency of A CRISIS in which prejudice and anger generated by THEIR LONG RESISTANCE to the democratic processes, may flame up to their great hurt. The situation in which the Jewish Problem rises is in large measure of JEWRY'S OWN CREATION. The root cause is the Jew's immemorial and pertinacious OBSESSION WITH AN ILLUSION that his race and people are the object of the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of their racial integrity and separateness. Their idea of an integral race HAS ITS PROTOTYPE IN NAZISM."

And then you yoked yourself "with unbelievers," in your pro-Jew denunciation of my patriotic devotion to our Christian Republic, made to the Court in the LaGuardia Case, wherein you listed me as "The No. 1 Anti-Semite of America," and hypocritically prated of my "intemperance" and "wild defamations." What a "beam" the Christian Century must have in its own eye, considering the quotations above and below.

After reading your editorial of Dec. 1 and the following anti-Jew comment in the Christian Century issues of April 29 and May 13, 1936, I have decided to resign in your favor the title "Anti-Semite No. 1!" I quote:

"Mutual" Tolerance Plea Exposed

"Jewry is a mutual benefit organization. It is also a propagandist organization. There can be no unity and no social health in the American community so long as any group invokes the holy sanctions of religion and the inviolable solidarity of national life, in perpetuation of irreconciliable factionalism.

"The tension between Jews and Christians cannot be effectively resolved by an appeal to the sentiment of mutual tolerance. In a problem of this kind, tolerance operates in a one-way street. It is exercised by the majority, not by the minority. It is putting a mask on the truth to describe this sort of tolerance as 'mutual.' "American society is an organism, and, as such, all its vital forces tend toward solidarity, unity, integration. Any unassimilable element of the population is bound to have trouble, because it's bound to make trouble.

"Let it be known that the Jewish Community holds its religion in such a manner that it neither desires to spread its characteristic ideals beyond those of its own blood, nor consents to expose itself to those normal cultural contacts which involve the exchange of spiritual goods—let this be known, and you have dried up the Fountain of Tolerance in the Christian Community. The Jew will never command the respect of the non-Jewish culture in which he lives so long as he huddles by himself, nursing his own 'uniqueness.' A Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take 'pot-luck' with humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot escape the suspicion that it is hoarding its treasures for a selfish purpose."

"Dangerous Anti Semitism"—for Jewry—and I endorse every word of your profound phillipic. But, it's a wonder the Jews haven't sued the Christian Century for "libel of and concerning the Jewish Religion," in order to "court martial and discipline" and suppress it. The only reason I can think of is that maybe the indictment is true, and therefore the Jews know it is not "actionable."

Your defamatory misrepresentations in my own case are actionable at law, in my opinion.

In passing, it may be remarked that the Christian Century has finally put itself in the same patriot-smear class as the Communistic New Masses, "Look" and "Life" and the Jewish-advertising dominated Saturday Evening Post's "Star-Spangled Fascist" lies of Rev. Stanley High.

Editor Morrison, take a friendly fraternal tip from a veteran journalist—warn the Protestant Churches to de-judaize themselves before it is too late, and purge the Religion of Christ of "Sons of the Devil" (John 8:44).

Robert Coward Comon Jon

GOLDEN SPIDER WEB FOR GENTILES

(Following is an Edmondson Publication of July 10, 1939:)

Following are the five points of Jewry's Palestine Kahal-Plan for World Hegemony.

• (1) Wherever they live, in organized groups, the Jews are A PEOPLE and A NATIONALITY.
• (2) Judaism is not merely a faith, a cult, a religion, in the Christian significance of these terms, but A CIVILIZATION, a culture unique in its ethical and social emphasis.
• (3) The spirit of the New Age in which we live is the Spirit of SCIENCE, progress and freedom. The entire Jewish Heritage must be re-evaluated in terms of THIS spirit.
• (4) Make the Jews A NATION IN THE POLITICAL AND ECON-OMIC SENSE IN PALESTINE, even as they are A NATIONALITY EVERY-WHERE OUTSIDE OF PALESTINE. This was the CENTRAL point of the program.

(5) This Jewish Homeland in Palestine is to be LINKED with ORGAN-IZED autonomous Jewish Centers the world over.

The foregoing outline is from Rabbi Barnett Brickner's analysis in the Herzl Symposium Memorial published in 1929 by Meyer W. Weisgal, New York. Rabbi Brickner interprets thus:

"By Nationalism and Nationality WE mean, not a political but a cultural concept. STATES exist whenever government controls nationalities for its own purposes. Jewish Nationalism does not divide the loyalty of the Jew; it seeks to release the spiritual potentialities latent in the Jewish heritage."

On this point the American Zionist pre-eminent leader Jacob Schiff, wrote Aug. 8, 1907, to President Solomon Schechter of the Jewish Theological Seminary: "I cannot for a moment concede that one can be at the same time a true American and an honest adherent of the Zionist (Herzl) movement."

Jewish Lawyer Bernard J. Brown writes in his book: "From Pharaoh to Hitler"—

"In law and in reason, there cannot be a division of nationality in any country without endangering the welfare of the Nation. To say that Jews are 'a religious minority' completely destroys their claim to minority group recognition in any country."

Rabbi's World Rule Plan

Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver's contribution to the Herzl Symposium includes this startling allusion to Palestine—"FROM WHICH VANTAGE POINT ISRAEL COULD MOVE THE WORLD."

"With the signing in London on Tuesday of the Dead Sea Concession, there was achieved what is the most remarkable effort ever undertaken by any group of American Zionists. The victory, which assures JEWISH DOMINATION in the management and direction of the Dead Sea, belongs to what is known as the Marks-Brandeis group."—N. Y. Jewish Daily Bulletin, March 24, 1929.

Moses Mendelsohn materialistically declared: "Judaism is NOT a religion, but revealed LEGISLATION," as quoted in "The History of the Jews" by Historian Graetz. The London Jewish Chronicle of August 13, 1937, confirmingly printed: "Judaism is essentially a 'religion' of LAW."

A Jewish state in Palestine would not be "a religious homeland," as alleged, but A POLITICAL move to establish a power-center with which the Jewish High Command could dominate the world through its "ORGANIZED MINORITY NATIONALITIES" placed in key control positions of Gentile Nations, as "Kahals."

In other words, Jewish Nationalism, directed by the Jewish State strategically located at the Gateway between the East and the West, would be used to communistically break down and internationalize Gentile countries via local "nationality" ("Fifth Columns") representatives of the Jerusalem Super-Government.

Rabbi Brickner significantly says: "Jewish Socialist-Zionists founded their movement because their aim is to see Palestine reconstructed on the Socialist Principles of KARL MARX and the Hebrew Prophets. In Palestine today most of the Jewish workers are members of this faction—one finds numerous colonies in which people live and work on a Communistic basis."

The Plan of the Plot for Jewish World Domination is vividly set forth in the quotation below from "The Key to the Mystery."

"Following is a boast written in 1918 by the Jew Louis Levy, edited by Nytnordisk Fortag, Copenhagen, as recited by the Jewish actor Samuel Besekow in a meeting of the Keren Hayesod in December, 1935; according to the Berlingske Tidende of December 9, 1935:

"'Who does not know what the glands in the human body represent? In the modern community of nations, THE JEWS HAVE SETTLED ON THE GLANDS—Exchanges, Banks, Ministries, Newspapers, Publishing, Insurance, Hospitals, Peace Palaces, etc.

"'JERUSALEM WILL BE AS A BUSY SPIDER IN A WEB WHOSE THREADS OF ELECTRICITY AND GOLD GLISTEN ALL OVER THE WORLD. THE CENTER OF THIS GOLDEN WEB, TO WHICH ALL THREADS RUN, IS JERUSALEM."

DISABLED VETERANS KOSHER-FOOLED

Open Letter of July 15, 1939, to Roy P. Monahan, Chairman, National Americanism Committee of Disabled Veterans of The World War.

I have before me a poster-sheet 17 x 22 inches, with "PROPAGANDA KIT" and a "Nazi Octopus" emblazoned thereon in letters of RED, which includes a dateless letter signed with your name, attacking American patriots.

Under a side-caption appears the following: "Robert Edward Edmondson in an interview stated that he had issued five million pamphlets. He was indicted for issuing LIBELOUS pamphlets on complaint of Mayor LaGuardia."

In another expensively-printed communication entitled "Report of Progress," prepared by the National Americanism Committee of the Disabled Veterans of the World War, dated June 7, 1939, 49 WALL St., N. Y. City (by which I locate you), the following statement is made over your name, referring to: "vicious, scurrilous, lying propaganda, issued by Robert Edward Edmondson. Anybody who reads the Propaganda Kit could read about Mr. Edmondson and his other publication, published from Glendale, Calif., called the Christian Free Press; the contents of which indicate that Mr. Edmondson and his publications are a part of propaganda coming into this country from Erfurt, Germany. Let us consider how well Mr. Edmondson has learned his lesson from the master-propagandist, Hitler."

Six Lies Exposed

LIE NO. 1: "In a interview Mr. Edmondson stated he had issued five million pamphlets." The only interview ever authorized by me was June 9, 1936, at the time of the indictment you refer to, including this statement: "It is estimated that we have been instrumental in having printed, reproduced and circulated more than 5,000,000 circulars." The pronoun "we" refers to Edmondson and patriotic associates. For your information the total to date is estimated to have reached over ten million Americans.

LIE NO. 2: "He was indicted for issuing LIBELOUS pamphlets, on complaint of Mayor LaGuardia." As the indictment was unconditionally DISMISSED May 10, 1938, said pamphlets were not found "libelous," as you falsely alleged; there being no group libel law covering the charge of "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion"—which was not attacked per se by the defendant.

LIE NO. 3: "His slander included Dean Gildersleeve and Frances Perkins." The last paragraph of the court's decision dismissing all allegations against me, reads this way: "And the court, on its own motion AND IN FURTHERANCE OF JUSTICE, dismisses indictments which charge libel against Frances Perkins and Virginia C. Gildersleeve, AS THESE INDICTMENTS ON THEIR FACE DO NOT SET FORTH A CRIME."

My "Slander?" Careful, Mr. Monahan.

LIE NO. 4: "A piece of vicious, scurrilous, lying propaganda issued by Edmondson," As the court decision passed on my power-publicity and dismissed the charge against me, how could it be composed of "vicious lies?" That may be actionable!

LIE NO. 5: "Anybody who read the Propaganda Kit distributed by the Committee, could read about Mr. Edmondson and his other publication—the Christian Free Press."

The Christian Free Press of California is edited and operated, according to my information, by Mrs. Leslie Fry, author of the famous documented work "Waters Flowing Eastward."

LIE NO. 6: "Edmondson publications are a part of the propaganda coming from Germany." You then attempt to show, by quoting from "Mein Kampf"—"how well Edmondson has learned his lesson from Hitler," and falsely put the Nazi brand on my patriotic work for America—another typical IEW-Trick.

April 23, 1934, replying to a letter from President D. A. Brown of the

American Hebrew, I wrote:

"Being PRO American, I am ANTI-Fascist, Anti-Communist, Anti-Socialist. We want AMERICANISM FOR THE U.S." I have never received a dollar from Adolph Hitler, directly or indirectly, to the best of my knowledge. So much for YOUR Jewish innuendo that I am a Nazi agent.

As I have always maintained that "For our disabled veterans the best is not good enough," it will be a pleasure to circulate this factual open letter among your membership, so that they may expose and remove a "leadership" that seems to me to be working against their best interests.

YOUR brand of Patriorism, Mr. Monahan, is spelled KOSHER!

ENTAIS OF AMEDICANISM

(Edmondson Bulletin of July 24, 1939)

In the Congressional Record in June, 1939, was published "Americanism Defined—A Politico-Religious Creed," by Charles Hall Davis of Virginia, described by Maryland's Senator as "one of the profound Constitutional lawyers of our Country."

The undersigned was so deeply impressed with the contents of this Americanism Creed that he had the entire document of about 6 pages reprinted by the Government Printing Office, to make it broadly available to patriots at

the cost price.

I have herein given extracts therefrom. To my mind, this "Americanism Defined" demonstrates beyond controversy that the Jews of America, unable to accept the Christian Social System established by our forefathers, by their own repudiation of assimilation, are actually in revolt against the Government of, by and for The People of the United States.

The quoted passages below are from Mr. Davis' masterpiece except as in-

dicated otherwise:

"The non-Christian cirizen of the United States " " may worship God as he pleases PROVIDED HE DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH OR INFRINGE UPON the similar

and equal rights of others; YET HE MUST ACCEPT, ENDORSE AND SUPPORT THE PRINCIPLES TAUGHT BY JESUS BECAUSE HIS RIGHTS AS SUCH CITIZEN ARE BASED ON THESE PRINCIPLES AS THE FOUNDATIONS OF AMERICANISM. NO MAN CAN BE A GOOD AMERICAN who does not accept, endorse and support that Political Philosophy or Theory of Government.

Prominent Jews like Rabbi Wise. Ludwig Lewisohn, Jacob Schiff, Samuel I. Rosenman, Maurice Samuel, have repeatedly declared that Jews cannot be assimilated into the organisms of the states in which they live. By that they proclaim hostility to such states as well as their allegiance to Jewry first.

Mr. Davis points out: "Americanism * * * is DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED to Communism, Bolshevism, Fascism, Nazism, Socialism, Totalitarianism, Paternalism, socialled Social Democracy, and all other 'isms' which are based on the Political Philosophy of the the Socialist School of Thought — because all of these 'ism' * * * assert the sovereignty of government over the people."

Bialik, the great Jewish poet, in an address at Jerusalem May 11, 1933, proclaimed that in principle Jews are "The creators of Liberalism, Democracy, Socialism and COM-MUNISM." While The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919, declared: "The Ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the finest Ideals of Judaism."

A Compound Republic

The Creed continues:

"The United States of America is A REPUBLIC OF REPUBLICS—A COMPOUND REPUBLIC. 'An indestructible union composed of indestructible states.'

(Editorial Comment: When Washington invades or usurps functions of the republican states of the Union, the great reserved rights are adversely affected, and loyal citizens have a self-preservation duty to resist.

"The imposition of limitations on the powers of Government in the hands of agents is a basic principle of the American Governmental Plan," says Mr. Davis. "LIMITATIONS CANNOT BE IMPOSED AND MAINTAINED ON GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY IN A PURE DEMOCRACY, because, when The People act they act AS SOVEREIGNS, and any limitations agreed to be observed in their future actions can be abrogated or revoked by them at any time in the exercise of that same sovereignty."

Mr. Davis, in the above, supplies the reasons why "democracy" was omitted from The Constitution and The Declaration. The Founders and Framers would have no 'democracy" and established a Government at Washington as the MOST LIMITED REPUBLIC IN THE WORLD.

ZIONISTS PUT U.S. IN WORLD WAR (Edmondson Bulletin July 25, 1939)

A sensational confession-communication published in the London "Jewish Chronicle" of Feb. 7, 1936, signed by S. Landman, a Jew, World-War British Propaganda Agent, indicates that Americans were slaughtered on European battlefields and robbed at home in an effort TO ESTABLISH A JEWISH STATE IN PALESTINE. The quotation below is self-explanatory:

"During the critical days of the war in 1916, when the defection of Russia was imminent and Jewish opinion generally was anti-Russia and had hopes that Germany, if victorious, would give them Palestine, several attempts were made by the Allies to bring America into the war on their side. These attempts were UNSUCCESSFUL.

"Mr. James Malcolm, at that time in close touch, took the initiative in convincing representatives of the British and French Governments that the best and perhaps THE ONLY WAY TO INDUCE THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT TO COME INTO WAR WAS TO SECURE THE CO-OPERATION OF ZIONIST JEWRY BY PROMISING THEM PALESTINE.

"BY DOING SO, THE ALLIES WOULD ENLIST AND MOBILIZE THE HITHERTO UNSUSPECTED POWERFUL FORCE OF ZIONIST

JEWRY IN AMERICA AND ELSEWHERE IN FAVOR OF THE ALLIES ON A QUID PRO QUO BASIS. AT THAT TIME, PRESIDENT WILSON ATTACHED THE GREATEST POSSIBLE IMPORTANCE TO THE ADVICE OF MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS (Zionist Leader in U. S.)

"Sir Mark Sykes obtained permission from the War Cabinet to authorize Mr. Malcolm to approach the Zionists ON THAT BASIS.

"THE ZIONISTS CARRIED OUT THEIR PART AND HELPED BRING AMERICA INTO THE WAR. The Ballour Declaration was not merely a voluntary gesture on the part of the Allies, but it was A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT and THE JEWISH PEOPLE—Authority: "History of the Peace Conference in Paris, Vol. (1920) Page 173, by H. M. V. Temperley (Jew)."

The following Associated Press cable of June 15, 1936, is confirmatory of the foregoing: "The promise of a national home for Jews in Palestine to gain world-wide support for the Allied Cause in the World War was detailed to the House of Commons today by David Lloyd George. 'We came to the conclusion that it was most vital that we should have the co-operation of Jews throughout the world. I bear testimony to the fact that the Jews responded."

The Jewish Plan for world dominion is contained in the Super-Zionist protocol-conception of a Jewish Palestine Super-Government which would control through Jewish "Nationality" minorities in all important nations, through the terrible power of the purse, reinforced by the 1200 billion dollars of wealth contained in the Dead Sea at the Gateway between the Occident and the Orient through the Suez Canal.

ILS ARMY TRAINING MANUAL SUBVERTED

Below is an Edmondson Bulletin of September 26, 1939:

Citizenship Training Manual (TM-2000-25) of the War Department of the United States was officially issued Nov. 30, 1928. By those who compiled the Manual this statement is made:

"Training Manual 2000-25 is the product of years of study and instruction. Every sentence was criticized by competent authorities, and approved by them as being correct and in harmony with the American Philosophy of Government."

Following are some of the important passages in Training Manual 2000-25:

"The American Philosophy of Government emphasizes that "THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS NOT A DEMOCRACY BUT A REPUBLIC

"DEMOCRACY is a government of The Masses; authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of 'direct' expression results in mobocracy; attitude toward property IS COMMUNISTIC—negating property rights; attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences; results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy. In practice . . . our form of government . . . is that of self-government by representation, which is 'the golden mean between autocracy and democracy.'

By War Department letter of Sept. 6, 1932, Citizenship Training Manual 2000-25 was withdrawn after a criticism on the floor of the U. S. Senate—as printed in Congressional Record Vol. 75, June 9, 1932, Pages 12782-5. "Some

of the matter was found to be of a controversial nature' says War Department letter of July 18, 1939, responding to request for a copy of the suppressed TM-2000-25.

Is it "controversial" that "The Government of the United States is not a democracy but a Republic"?

Is it "controversial" that "democracy is a government of the masses"?

Is it "controversial" that "our representative government is the golden mean between autocracy and democracy"?

Is it "controversial" that the "attitude of a democracy toward property is COMMUNISTIC"?

And whom do you think was the Senate critic of the Citizenship Manual? None other than Senator George W. Norris, Social Democrat from Nebraska, "Father" of the Socialistic TVA Government Ownership Project.

Roosevelt was quoted by the N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938, as saying: "We are not only the largest and most powerful DEMOCRACY," but other democracies look to us for leadership—that World Democracy may survive."

Now note that "Social Democracy" Senator Norris, among other features, especially objected (See Page 12785, Congressional Record 6-9-32), to the following in Training Manual 2000-25:

"SOCIALISM OR COMMUNISM WHICH NEGATES PROPERTY RIGHTS; ANARCHY, WHICH NEGATES LAW; Substitution of 'direct action' for Representative Government; Government Ownership — all should be avoided as perils that threaten the very foundation of The Republic,"

CANADIAN ANTI-JEWISH PARTY LAUNCHED (From 1938 Edmondson Bulletin)

In the address below of July 4, 1938, launching the program of the Canadian National Unity Party, with its aims purely nationalistic and anti-Jewish, under the battle-cry of "Canada for the Canadians," Leader Arcand of Montreal outlined its objectives before a Toronto audience in Massey Hall numbering more than 2500, mostly young men, "who thunderously cheered" the speaker, according to the Toronto Evening Globe of July 5, 1938.

Robert Edward Edmondson attended that enthusiastic meeting after addressing party convention leaders on the subject of U. S. conditions including elucidation of the victory won over Jewish anti-American elements who instigated against him the false religious libel indictment dismissed May 10, 1938.

A majority of the 85 national convention leaders were described in the Toronto Evening Telegram of July 4 as "comparatively young, nattily dressed and confident. THEY BELIEVE IN THEMSELVES." Their enthusiasm is contagious and inspirational. "To the death" Courage is prophetic. And they are unitedly and intelligently ANTI-JEWISH. No Jews will be admitted into membership" declared Leader Arcand in the Toronto Daily Star of July 4. The National Unity Party is "going places." It is the organized spearhead of this great patriotic movement in North America.

I have been in the midst of it. It is based on a moral rebirth. It is being directed by master-strategy. It is conducted under Spartan discipline. Its progress is by law and order. And its energy has confounded the common enemy, whose jitteriness is exposed by overt acts. Its keynote "Serviam"—I SERVE! is emblematic of its fundamental character.

"We are going through," Leader Arcand declared in his inspiring address. "We shall save Canada from the clutches of International Jewry. Who invented the word Gentile? Who invented Jew? We did not. They started the discrimination. We will carry it on. It is a question of life or death.

"Russia is ruled 100% by Jews today. They would do the same to Canada. This is a fight to the finish. Communism was invented by the Jew Karl Marx. Socialism came to power in France through Blum. The Reds in Spain were led by the Jews Zamorra, Azana, Rosenberg. In Hungary, it was Belas Kuhn. In England are Laski, Melchett, Sassoon. The leader of the Communist Party in China is a Jew Jews everywhere!

"When International Jewry gains power in a country, there is no more liberty. Dictatorship of finance is held by the Jew. Money was made to serve, not to exploit. Democracy has materialized and Judaized us. Let us stand up and fight it. Jews are being poured into our land from abroad—revolutionaries, destroyers. Look at the destruction of coffee, cotton, livestock, and other food!

"We are going to bring back the Great Fire of Truth. We say Canada must be a country of white men. We want Canada to be a Christian Country. Other religions will be tolerated so long as they do not meance the security of the state. WE ARE DEFENDING OUR HOMES!"

(1942 ADDENDA)

(For his patriotic selfless service Adrien Arcand was later interned five years without charges at the beginning of World War Two at the instigation of the same forces who futilely tried for seven years to jail Robert Edward Edmondson, and which "International Jewry" brought on World War Two, as forecast to Edmondson by former President David Brown of the American Hebrew at a 1934 conference held in N. Y. City).

ADMITTER ATING AMERICANISM

An Invitation Address delivered April 4, 1940, before the Public Relations Council of The Women's City Club of Philadelphia by Robert Edward Edmondson.

Your speaker deeply appreciates the privilege and opportunity of submitting for your consideration authentic information of immense importance to our country in a great crisis.

The general subject of this address is "Adulterating Traditional or Constitutional Americanism."

Its aim is to prove to you how and why Americanism has been adulterated; how to purge it of poison, and the way to restore it.

Making my position clear, I come before you with no political or sectional partisanship—only a Militant American. Having no delusions of grandeur, my sole "racket" is restoration of The Republic. As publicity is the only cure for great public evils, no "passion for anonymity" is permissible.

I unalterably stand against ACTIONS by any group-minority—political-international-racial-economic-religious—which promotes ideologies alien to and subversive of our traditional republic form of government as set up by the U.S. Constitution.

In this address it is intended merely to open perspectives for those who may be seeking truth and causes—in accord with our immortal Lincoln's admonition: "Let the people know the Truth—and the country will be safe!"

It is not necessary to say that America is now in deep politico-economic distress. Never has our country been in such dire peril. What is responsible for our apparent recovery impotence? Has our moral fibre degenerated? If so, what has rotted it?

In his 1939 book "Propaganda in the Next War," British Author Rogerson said Americans were easy marks for mass-propaganda. In witness whereof, he declared boldly that the United States was deliberately propaganda-embroiled in the last great war. HAVE WE DEGENERATELY STOPPED THINKING FOR OURSELVES?

In crusading for regeneration of Americanism it is astounding to find how few citizens know their government, its political system, or rights and duties involved.

Therefore, in these parlous times of compounded-confusion, propaganda promoted, for clarity it is vital to understand just what one is talking about before attempting to impart knowledge.

Just what is traditional or Constitutional Americanism? Let Charles Hall Davis. Virginia's high constitutional authority, make it plain:

"Americanism holds that the people are MASTERS of Government. The Socialist School holds that Government is MASTER OF MEN.

"The fundamental principle of the American PLAN is that of LIMITA-TION on the powers of government."

"Americanism is diametrically opposed to Communism, Bolshevism, Fascism, Nazism, Totalitarianism, Social Democracy and Paternalism. THE UNITED STATES IS A REPUBLIC OF REPUBLICS—A COMPOUND REPUBLIC!

"The non-Christian citizen of the United States may worship God as he pleases provided he does not interfere with or infringe upon the similar and equal rights of others; yet he must accept, endorse and support the principles taught by Jesus because his rights as such citizen are based upon these principles as the foundations of Americanism."

In official supplementation, it is significant to note that in the 1928 Citizenship Training Manual of the U. S. War Dept., the following Republic confirmation is emphasized:

"The Government of the United States is NOT a democracy but A REPUBLIC!"

Recall also that the Constitution guarantees to each of the 48 states "a REPUBLICAN form of government," not a democratic form.

During an address on Dec. 10, 1938, before the Allentown, Pa., Anti-Communist Society, the privilege was afforded me of making prominently public for the first time in this modern era the fact that the word "democracy" had been deleted by the signers, not only from the American Declaration of Independence but also from the U. S. Constitution.

Hendrik Willem van Loon, in his "Story of Democracy," declares "The Athenian democracy perished, as practically EVERY EXPERIMENT IN DEMOCRACY HAS COME TO A DIREFUL END—destroyed by its own inner violence."

An exhausive study has convinced me that the CAUSE of our major troubles has been the adulteration of Americanism by repeated mass-immigration-waves of "the wretched refuse of Europe's teeming shores"—as Emma Lazarus describes it in a poetic welcome recorded on the bronze tablet of the Statue of Liberty in New York.

Socialistic "Refuse"

They have brought with them leveling down socialist and collectivist ideologies. Our forefathers left Europe to escape such false doctrines. These international communizing conceptions are deadly poison to our individualistic American Philosophy, with its check-and-balance protection against Proletarian as well as Autocratic dictatorship.

Have we been too generous in alien policy? Have we worshiped at the liberalistic shrine of the Fetish of Tolerance until it has grown into a Frankenstein monster? "There is a limit at which forebearance ceases to be a virtue" declared the great English statesman, Edmund Burke.

You would not tolerate a rattlesnake in your home. Were the evil money-changers tolerated in the Temple—or were they lashed out?

Why should we compromise with a deadly enemy? In essence, tolerance is international—like Communism, which is also anti-national. We have tolerated an alien international flood that has dangerously diluted the Fountain of Americanism.

The Constitution has not failed us—we have failed it. And the Treason of Tolerance has had much to do with it.

The Constitution does not invest those enjoying its endowments, with the right to destroy it. To exist, it must exact of citizens the eternal-vigilance duty to defend-protect-preserve such beneficent instrumentality. We hear too much today about rights, and too little about duties. But you cannot dodge the consequence of dodging your responsibilities.

The N. Y. Times of Sept. 13, 1939, reported that the Central Conference of American Rabbis passed a resolution challenging the American System, declaring:

"There is only one way in which the American people can escape Fascism and Communism—and that is by establishing a thoroughly SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY."

What is Social Democracy? Webster's International Dictionary defines it as: "The Socialist Party founded in Germany by Ferdinand La Salle — later united with the followers of Karl Marx."

Do we Americans want in our country the Soviet democracy-communism of Karl Marx, Trotsky and Lenin, which makes government supreme and suppresses personal initiative? Shall we substitute that for the American Republic Individualistic Philosophy which promotes personal initiative and security, preserves property rights and provides sound progress and enduring happiness?

"Rugged" individualism in the sense of ruthlesness, is just as much to be condemned as its opposite, the despotism of the proletariat, aptly described by the immortal poet Homer as "that worst of tyrannies, an usurping crowd." Traditional Americanism stands for the Golden Mean—not extremes.

When in 1913 Amendment 17 to the Constitution was adopted, a great political communization occured; for it set up a "POPULAR FRONT" election of senators in repudiation of the famous check-and balance function originally established providing for legislative selection.

High legal authority holds this 17th Amendment to be unconstitutional because states were deprived, without consent, of equal suffrage or "ambassadorial representation" at Washington as sovereign units. Eleven states DEMURRED.

President Roosevelt internationally proclaimed— (I quote from the N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938): "We are not only the largest and most powerful democracy, but other democracies look to us for leadership, that world democracy may survive."

Yet the LIMITATION-principle corner-stone of our Republic is repugnant to democracy because it is destructive of democracy.

This Socialistic New Deal is NOT Americanism. It is a foreign importation, brought here through Great Britain, where it was called "PEP"—like the "NEP" of Russia; in both cases the alphabetical trick explanation standing for "I conomic Planning." Its sponsor was the Socialistic Fabian Society of Britain.

What has happened? Americans have been Communistically regimented and their governmental administration has been Fascistically centralized under the imported international New Deal.

Unless Americanism is purged—make no mistake, DOWN GOES THE REPUBLIC! Therefore, we are in a self-preservation fight to the finish—a struggle for existence itself. How can we save ourselves?

Obviously, the first remedial step is to stop immigration, strictly limiting visitors; the second is to deport aliens; the third is to Americanize new citizens. What is to be done with those who refuse to assimilate? The Christian Century of Chicago (April 29 and May 13, 1936) offers this keen comment: I quote:

Anti-Assimilationists Make Trouble

"American society is an organism, and, as such, all its vital forces tend toward solidarity, unity, integration. Any unassimilated element of the population is bound to have trouble because it is BOUND TO MAKE TROUBLE."

The politico-economic subversions heretofore listed could have been stopped at their inception if we had a press that was FREE? Many of you may think we have a free press. As a veteran journalist, I warn you that such is not the case.

One of my exposure publications on this subject was quoted recently in the Congressional Record. It emphasized these fundamentals:

"What is the DUTY of the press to the nation that endows it with freedom? Isn't it to guard jealously the state which creates it?

"Our press is free—to betray us. Through secret coercion, it hides the real news. It clogs channels of publicity with anti-American propaganda. It sells its columns to an alien enemy. Judas-like, it betrays its creator for "a piece of silver."

How can we emancipate this, our first line of defense? By boycotting offending publications. Without circulation, advertising space becomes worthless. As a veteran newspaperman, your speaker tells you that when an editor receives half a dozen sharp criticisms from his reading public, he becomes littery. He hears his master's voice.

Let us stop once and for all this destructive Adulteration of Americanism. Be George Washington vigilante patriots. Put none but Militant Americans on guard! Think Straight America! Speak Plain American! Act and Vote Direct American!

Let us proclaim a New Declaration of Independence from internationalism. Shall we sit supinely inert while loyal citizens and their children are denied their priceless heritage of equal rights by alien elements which crowd them out of the channels of achievement in their own country?

What is our practical political recourse? When our Washington servants usurp any of the check-and-balance functions of the government, the great retained rights of the citizenry are adversely affected, and under Constitutional endowments they have a duty to resist.

When elected and appointed officers disregard their sworn duties, American citizens automatically become virtual state militia. They can be constitutionally deputized under local sheriffs into militant vigilantes exercising the pro-

tective reserved-powers of the sovereign states.

I do not believe that Militant Americanism is dead. It still lives in the great heart of the nation. It has been lulled into fancied security by the siren songs of the Lilliputians of an anti-human Socialism that will not work.

We Americans of today are being tested in a patriotic crucible. Shall we be found fit for and worthy of the matchless heritage bequeathed to us by our giant forefathers, who selflessly laid their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor on the Altar of Country? God grant it!

The international enemy is not going to give up the rich prize of America without a show of force. It may or may not be physical.

Some of us may be called upon to make the supreme sacrifice! Shall we shrink from that? Our heroic forefathers did not draw back. If they had, where would you and I be today?

If Americanism is to survive, ALIENISM MUST BE DESTROYED

We shall keep America American just so long as the Land of the Free is the Land of the Brave.

STAND FAST FOR THE REPUBLIC.

I thank you!

JEWS CALL FOR "DEMOCRACY"— THEN ADMIT IT "FAILED IN EUROPE"

(From Edmondson Broadcast of Jan. 16,1940)

"Our President . . . has called upon men and women . . . to preserve the principles of Democracy, Race consciousness is creeping into our political life . . . Increasingly we hear of racial or religious blocs. Divisions between our people must not be allowed if Democracy is to be preserved. Hate begets hate, and intolerance begets intolerance."—

"When the social and economic SYSTEM OF DEMOCRACY BROKE DOWN (in Europe) men could no longer make a living, and individual liberties were surrendered. Dictatorships gaued a foothold."—N. Y. Gov. H. H. Lehman's Jackson Day Dinner Speech (N. Y. Times 1-9-40).

Constitutionalists Damn Democracy

"Pure Democracies have ever been the scenes of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or rights of property." — Constitution-Framer James Madison in The Federalist, November, 1787.

As a loyal American I am required to be INTOLERANT of religious or racial activities dangerous to the peace and safety of The Republic.

And I am required to be INTOLERANT of Jewish anti-American politicoeconomic activities tending to change the form of the present government of the United States without the constitutional consent of the people.

Either you are FOR The Republic, or you are against it. THERE CAN BE

NO COMPROMISE IN THIS SUPREME CRISIS.

DEMOCRACY DESTROYS CIVILIZED LIBERTIES

(From Edmondson Bulletin Jan. 16, 1940)

Lord Macaulay, famous English statesman, in a letter of May 23, 1857, to a New Yorker, delivered a scathing denunciation of "Democracy" in the language quoted below:

"I have been convinced that institutions purely DEMOCRATIC must, sooner or later, DESTROY LIBERTY AND CIVILIZATION. Either the poor will plunder the rich, or order would be saved by a strong military government.

"The Huns and Vandals who ravaged the Roman Empire came from without; your Huns and Vandals will have been engendered within your own country."

(The quotation is taken from "Macaulay's Life and Letters" by G. O. Trevelyan Vol. 1, 1875).

The foregoing was printed in the Wilkesbarre (Pa.) "Record" of Jan. 11, 1940.

PROTOCOL FULFILLMENT

(Analytical Edmondson Bulletin of Feb. 20, 1940)

Under the title "The Jews & Freemasons—Exploding the Myth of a World Conspiracy," Bernarr Macfadden's weekly magazine "Liberty" of February 10 and 17, 1940, attempts to give International Jewry a clean bill of health as regards its complicity with the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' and their plans for world domination.

"Why does this publication so prominently champion Jewry?" The answer may be found in the point that Bernard MacFadden is generally known in N. Y. City as a half-Jew—which supplies prejudice.

So much for inspiration, Since the article supplies nothing new and is a rehash of old stuff, the sin of omission stands out like a sore thumb and is also confirmatory of bias, for the re-write authors base their forgery-allegation largely on a Berne canton trial in Switzerland where the lower court is said to have handed down a decision in which the protocols were alluded to as forgeries in "by-talk" of no legal value—but which verdict was REVERSED later (N. Y. World-Telegram 11-1-37) by the Switzerland High Court of Appeals with the statement that the question of whether or not the Protocols of the Elders of Zion were authentic was not the issue in the case—the technical charge being distribution of "indecent" literature. So that there was no "forgery verdict."

WHAT ARE THE PROTOCOLS?

Just what are "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"?

A book placed in the British Museum via Russia in 1906 containing a record of 24 alleged secret meetings of an International Jewish Sanhedrin called "The Kehillah." "The Protocols" are now reported as having a circulation larger than The Bible. Authorship is anonymous.

What is their purport?

A plot or organized conspiracy to establish a world Jewish super-government,

Do they indicate how this is to be done?

Yes. The protocolic war strategy is to promote Communistic revolution among Gentile nations and seize politico-economic control during the chaos through "the power of gold," which is declared to have been cornered by Jews through subsidization of the press.

Americanism is unconcerned with the authenticity or the authorship of the famous so-called "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," or whether, as alleged by Jewish writers, they are "racial libels," "forgeries" or "plagiarisms."

Americanism IS concerned with WHY such prophecy-plans, used to promote the bloody Jewish-Communist Conquest of Russia in 1917, have also been adopted and actually fulfilled in subversive Communistic laws and administration by the Jewish-Radical Roose-velt "New Deal" Regime.

"There is not an iota of proof" says the "Liberty" article, "in the statement that the League of Nations was "the creation of Jewish minds." Yet Zionist Leader Nahum Sokoloff declared: "We Jews established the League of Nations after a fight of 25 years (N. Y. Times Aug. 28, 1922). Jewish Poet Zangwill held the League to be a "Jewish Aspiration." "A single world government is coming; we are going through the pangs of this creation AT THE PRESENT TIME." declared Rabbi B. B. Glazer of N. Y. City (N. Y. Times, 12-11-39).

The "Liberty" article also scornfully refers to "an alleged statement by Benjamin Franklin warning the American people against Jews—a statement long discredited by

scholars." That "prophecy" is in the same class with the protocols, for Franklin authorship has never been legally proved nor disproved; but the N. Y. Public Library contains "Benjamin Franklin's Writings" by Smythe, Vol. 8, in which appears very repeated antagonism by the American statesman against Jewish acts; and the "prophecies" themselves are, like the protocols, being fulfilled BY JEWS IN AMERICA through the Roosevelt Jewish Radical Administration, as detailed comparisons herewith incontrovertibly show.

The last edition of the Nilus protocols "was confiscated by the Kerensky government of Russia in 1917" says the magazine story. Kerensky is a Jew.

Machiavelli is drawn upon to show that the protocols were taken from the Italian statesman's peculiar political philosophy; but it is not necessary to verify the "chosen people" obsession as to world dominion, to search history any further than Biblical repetition of Jehovah promises to Israelites as to their prospective world super-government.

Extracts below are from protocol plans, with their actual fulfillments in American political-economic life, the figures after paragraphs being protocol numbers:

POLITICS

Protocol Plans

Far back in the ancient times we were the first to cry "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity."—1. When we introduced into state organisms the Poison of Liberalism, states have been seized with a mortal illness.—10.

The political has nothing in common with the moral: he who wishes to rule must have recourse to cunning and make believe; frankness and honesty are vices in politics.

In politics we must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation: we must not stop at bribery, deceit and reachery.—1.

A satisfactory government is one that concentrates in the hands of one person only.—10.

Throughout Europe and other continents we must produce ferments, discords and hostility. Intensification of armaments is essential to the completion of our plans.—7.

We shall appear as alleged saviors of the worker from oppression, and propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces—Socialists, Communists and Anarchists.—3.

We have got into our hands the administration of the law, conduct of elections, the press, and educational training. We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the Gentiles by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be fallacies, although it is by us that they have been inculcated.—9.

Our power will be more invincible than any other because it will remain invisible until it has gained such strength that nothing can undermine it.—1.

Fulfillments

The United States of America is "sick" politically. Is this illness due to a poisonous propaganda flood of Liberalism, Socialism, Communism—during the Jewish Radical New Deal Regime?

Note broken pledges of the Jewish-Radical Roosevelt Administration: "Sound money at all hazards"; "Farm recovery must not be coercive"; "a tariff commission free from executive interference"; "we will cut government expenses 25 per cent," whereas national debt has trebled.

Were voters "bribed" with Santa Claus gifts, and deceived by the New Deal administration of Jewish-Radical reforms?"

Roosevelt was unquestionably given dictatorial powers by pressure on Congress, which initiated few New Deal laws

Is there discord in Furope and America? Are the armaments of Russia, France, Italy, England, Germany, Japan being increased?

New Dealers have constantly posed as saviors of labor with Sidney Hillman's CIO The American Federation of Labor is reported to have been communistically subverted. Its Jewish Vice-President Woll welcomes refugees. Its General Counsel, Jos. A Padway, is a Jew.

Are Jewish Radical elements in prominent university professorships and columnist positions of great metropolitan newspapers? Has the U. S. Supreme Court been undermined by "packing" appointments?

Have we "invisible government" by Jewish "unofficial advisors" at Washington, such as Brandeis, Frankfurter. Morgenthau, Baruch and hundreds of other Key Jews?

Protocol Plans

The principal factor in Politics is secrecy; the word should not agree with the deed of the diplomat.—7.

We have in our service persons of all doctrines — Communists, Socialists, demagogues, utopian dreamers.—9.

To sum up our system of keeping the governments of the Gentiles of Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrotist attempts.—7.

We shall create an intensified centralization of government.—5.

We have set the people on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorbtion of individuality by the symbolic unit of collectivism. This hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established one unit unlike another precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality.—15.

We must discredit personal initiative; nothing is more dangerous to our cause.—5.

The best results in governing are attained by violence.—1.

God has given to us (his Chosen People), the gift of dispersion, and in this, which appears to be our weakness, has come forth our strength—which has brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.

—11.

ECONOMICS

Economic crises have been produced by us for the Gentiles by no other means than withdrawal of money from circulation.—20.

Wars should be brought on to the economic ground; our INTERNATIONAL rights will then WIPE OUT NATIONAL RIGHTS—2; the despotism of capital is entirely in our hands.—1.

We shall establish huge monopolies.—6

As landed proprietors can be most harmful to us from the fact that they are self-sufficing, it is essential for us to deprive them of their land by loading it with debt.—6.

Fulfillments

Who knows the secret framers of the Securities Paralysis Act, Monetary Deflation Law, NRA, SEC and 5 Billion Relief Measure? Mordecai Ezekiel framed the AAA. Nathan Margold runs the Interior Dept., Herbert Feis the State Dept.

Washington.swarms with all those classes, including members of the Frankfurter American Civil Liberties Union.

The "Red Terror" in Russia has "liquidated" 20 million Gentiles. It butchered Spain. NRA "economic death" policy terrorized and ruined American small business men.

Political power has been centered as never before in Washington, with legislative power usurped.

United States church reds, radicals, socialists and demagogues ride this hobby-horse roughshod over all American Constitutional rights.

Restrictive regimentation laws in industry and agriculture have extensively curtailed individual liberties and destroyed personal initiative.

There has been more strike violence duting the Roosevelt Jewish-Radical Regime than in over 25 years previous.

How does this check up with super-government League of Nations "aspirations" voiced by Jewish Author Zangwill in 1920, Zionist Leader Sokolow in 1922 and Rabbi Wise at the 1934 Geneva Jewish Congress?

Did cornering of money and the withdrawal thereof cause, and is it prolonging the "Great Suppression?"

Germany, Japan, Spain, and Italy are being subjected to Jewish Financial Boycott pressure for expelling Jewish Communists. "Wars are generally caused by economic pressure," Jewish Speculator Baruch told a Senate Committee March 27, 1935.

Was NRA a "huge monoply?" American credit and banking have been monopolized by the Jewish-Radical New Dealers.

Are not U. S. farms overloaded with debt-mortgages?

Protocol Plans

We shall raise wages, which, however, will not bring any advantage to workers, for at the same time we shall produce a rise in the prices for the necessities of life, →6.

To give the Gentiles no time to think their minds must be diverted * * * thus all nations will take no note of their common for -4.

Fulfillments

The cost of living is rising faster than wages under the Jewish-Radical New Deal, due to food destruction, enormous confiscatory new taxation, experiment and doubling of national debt.

Isn't the American majority, due to diversions, its subverted press, and misleading propaganda, still blind to the deadly peril of the Internationalist menace:

THE PRESS

We must compel governments to act as favored by our plans, secretly promoted through the great power of the press which with but few exceptions which may be disregarded, is already in our hands.—7.

To put public opinion in our hands we must bring it to a state of bewilderment by giving expression on all sides to so many contradictory opinions as to cause the Gentiles to lose their heads and make it impossible to know where they are in the resulting chaos.—5.

The American press, screen and radio, are Jewish-dominated through ownership, advertising subsidization and distribution channels control.

This is a key-strategy of the protocols. Have we been bewildered by the Jewish-Radical New Dealer flood of propaganda in the press, over the air and on the screen? Deceive-Confuse-Collapse-Dictate — That is the outline of the Plan of Jewish Communistic Democracy to Enslave America.

DEATH WARNING TO CONGRESSMAN

(Edmondson Bulletin March 27, 1940)

The following is a significant extract from the Congressional Record of March 14, 1940:

"(Hon. Jacob Thorkelson of Montana) Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to address The House for one minute. On March 4, I spoke in New York on the rights of the people as set forth in the Constitution of the U. S. (Ed. Note: He delivered a lecture before a packed meeting of the Christian Mobilizers in New York).

"In the mail today I received a book entiled "Choice Is Mine," and appended to the book were these notices, WHICH ARE A THREAT ON MY LIFE: Thorkelson: Mc-Williams' dupes have learned not their lesson. Have you learned yours yet? Evidently not, but it's in this story—if you want to know what it's all about before you're called, Don't forget: This trip may end any second. Have you the courage to face your maker? Be prepared! Read "Choice Is Mine"—because the next time you may be one of those on the other side."

"Mr. Speaker, the writer did not sign his name. We know, however, happenings of the past; and, messages of this sort should not be treated lightly, for it is significant that our own policing departments ARE LAX IN THEIR OBLIGATED DUTIES.

"In reading this book, one can raise no question AS TO ITS ORIGIN, and I say now that if the Department of Justice and other law-enforcement bodies do not protect their own critizens in the performance of their duties to this Republic, THE PEOPLE THEM-SELVES MUST TAKE ACTION AND REMOVE THE MENACE WHICH IS THREATENING OUR NATION."

When Congressman Thorkelson referred to other "happenings of the past," doubtless he had in mind the reported poisoning of the late Pennsylvania Congressman Louis T. McFadden, who had been inserting in the Congressional Record great volumes of Jew-exposing records—as is Thorkelson; and when McFadden died the Jewish Sentinel of Chicago (10-8-36) published his picture with a sub-caption "OUT OF THE WAY!" Whose way?

I recall the shooting of former Senator Huey Long of Louisiana by Jewish Dr. Weiss ten days after he began to make overtures looking to a Jewish Problem conference with me. The late Senator Thomas D. Schall of Minnesota met with a mysterious fatal accident shortly after he wrote to me praising aggression in crusading for Americanism.

While living in New York City the undersigned received many threats similar to those sent Congressman Thorkelson; but, notwithstanding jewish Communist warnings,

"Lawless Mayor LaGuardia" cancelled my pistol permit after a Jew had invaded my office with hostile intent—and then left hurriedly after seeing the gun on my desk, muttering "I'll get you!"

Under the circumstances, Congressman Thorkelson is fully justified in having these threats put in the record and declaring that the people must act to save The Republic.

THE IEWISH MENACE

(A By-Request Brevity Question Answer Analysis of March 26, 1940 by Edmondson)

What is the variously called Jewish Threat, Jewish Peril, Jewish Plague, Jewish Problem?

A destructive attempt to dominate non-Jew peoples by a super-organized international secret power exercised economically and politically by Jewish Minority Solidarity.

Why is it a peril for Americans?

Because it attacks individual and national existences, to substitute therefore its anti-Gentile ideologies, including "a thoroughly socialized democracy." Jewry refuses to assimilate, acting as a disintegrating solvent.

How?

Through its coercive monopoly-weapon of the gold money supply of the world.

How did it get such control?

By economic planning during many centuries, as indicated by biblical and secular records.

What is the root cause of the movement?

Materialistic deification worship of the Golden Calf for thousands of years; during which time Jews learned "all the secrets that lay hid" in money-manipulation, which made them "Lords of Money" and Lords of the Materialistic World.

In view of the Chosen People Tradition, did religion have much to do with this activity?

"Since you can't "religionize" materialism—only the spirit—the answer must be "No." Jews use religion and race as screens to hide their subversions.

What is meant by the "Chosen People Myth?"

Both Protestant and Catholic Christian documents agree that Jews were once chosen by their God as a favored people, and then repudiated.

Did race have anything to do with the matter?

Only in the sense of planned intensification or an anti-assimilation inbreeding—to promote the Jewish Common Solidarity.

Why does the Jewish Peril menace all American Life?

Because its materialistic ideology is carried out through a Socialistic, Communistic, Atheistic leveling-down of peoples into the status of slaves.

What is the alleged Anti-Semitic persecution to which the Jews constantly refer?

The term is a misleading blanket camouflage because the 10 to 15 million Arabs and Syrians also belong to the Semite Race, as well as the Jews.

What causes anti-Jewishness?

The presence of Jews in perceptible numbers in any Gentile community, confesses their great Zionist Founder-Leader Theodor Herzl in his book "The Jewish State." Where there are no Jews, "anti-Semitism" does not exist.

What is the Jewish Problem IN SOLUTION:

Politico-Economic, because of its monetary-tyranny domination.

What is the remedy?

Destruction of the international Jewish monetary monopoly-mechanism and disfranchisement.

How can that be done?

By national governmental action.

Through what method?

Free press publicity which educationally produces corrective legislation.

Can that be effected?

Yes, through disfranchisement and deportation of Jews on the ground that the practice of their internationalist "Way of Life" constitutes a danger to the peace and safety of The Republic, under the Constitution. Jews have been expelled from every civilized nation in the past because they became a politico-economic menace to the state, not on account of their religion.

Where can they be humanely sent?

To the healthful and little developed fertile Island of Madagascar off the southeast coast of Africa, and which will hold all of them.

A MILITANT PRO-AMERICAN PLAN IN ACTION (Published April 20, 1940, by Edmondson)

THE PRESS: Let Militant American Patriots in small-group action, write and call upon newspaper and magazine publishers and editors repeatedly, in every town and city, and lawfully warn them against suppression of TRUTH in news and editorials and columnist propaganda, under penalty of withdrawal of Gentile subscriptions and advertising; and of documentary exposures of evidence of treasonable publicity. Offending publications should be boycotted in every lawful manner. Hold patriotic protest meetings. Send adopted resolutions to editors.

For efficient action, Vigilante Patriotic Groups must make a special study of the Fundamentals of Traditional Americanism, starting from the fact that the United States is A Republic—not a Democracy. Deliver documented lectures. Give detailed factual references.

THE PRESS IS WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM-AUTHORITY TO PUBLISH MATTER DESTRUCTIVE OF THE GOVERNMENT WHICH ENDOWS IT WITH THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH. It is endowed with the Right to Create—nor to Destroy good government.

Jewish control of advertising, plus financial coercion, plus ownership, plus distribution-direction—have subverted the news Freedom of The Press in the Cities of the United States in violation of the Constitutional guarantee, to the extent that Truth is suppressed from the news and Propaganda subversive of The Spirit of Americanism prevails throughout the Nation.

THE RADIO AND SCREEN: Similar lawful warnings should be given to managers of radio stations, movie theaters and picture producers. Hold specific protest assemblies.

The Radio and Screen have developed highly effective channels of current news, education and subversive propaganda. Radio stations are under Federal license, and advertising Jews dominate the big broadcasting systems, as well as the moving picture industry.

Remember that publicity pressure by the Catholic League for Decency brought important remedial action as to immoral screen pictures. Emulate such methods!

heads of universities, colleges and other "higher-education" professors who may be educated beyond their intellectual capacity to comprehend basic Americanism.

Tell them that, in addition to Rights derived from the Constitution, they owe Duties to it; that American Freedom comes before Academic Freedom—The latter perishes if the former falls.

Tell them that contributions from state authorities and others will be stopped by patriotic action unless their allegiance is first to the basic American ideologies that make it possible for them to enjoy Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Deliver exposing lectures.

RACIAL MINORITIES: Similar lawful warnings should be given to representatives of the Jewish Minority, which refuses to assimilate into the single organism of Americanism, and demands by resolution that 'a thoroughly socialized democracy' (communism) be substituted in place of the American Republic System Hold peaceful exposure assemblies

Tell Jews that unless they change the anti-American practice of their "way of life" from being a "danger to the peace and safety" of The Republic, they will be deported by authority of a new constitutional amendment. Protest to legislators, demanding justice for Gentiles.

American patriots seek no violence—only exact justice. Legal advice in this connection is imperative to avoid Jew trips set by tricksters backed by unlimited funds. Document all charges.

CHURCH ADMINISTRATIONS. Similar lawful warnings should be given to church leadership because of an anti-American departure from Fundamental Moral Teachings and ecclesiastical invasion of Politico-Economic Fields, where they try to dominate without having practical knowledge of affairs. Write letters to them and call meetings of protest. Don't pussyfoot!

Point out that a cardinal principle of Americanism is separation of Church and State, Religion and Politics; and that a sound solution of Economic, Financial and Monetary Problems requires special knowledge, which they do not possess.

Tell them that preaching of Collectivist Socialism and Communistic Democracy is against Individual Traditional Americanism, and must be stopped; that the Right of Free Speech guaranteed by The Republic, does not confer upon them the privilege of destroying the Constitutional Government which makes them secure in their individual right to the enjoyment of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

BE MILITANT!

"NO JEW-WAR FOR U.S."

(Edmondson Bulletin of April 23, 1940)

Kenneth A. Brown, of Gervais, Oregon, 31, unmarried, college graduate, scion of one of Oregon's oldest and respected families, for ten years operating large scale farming enterprises, has announced his candidacy for the Republican Congressional nomination in the First Oregon District; and in his circular announcement of April 12, 1940, he submitted the following statement, which was suppressed by The Press of his state:

"In this campaign upon which I am entering, and which will be noteworthy for its forthright frankness, I shall, in discussing vital issues of the day, call a spade a spade, and, where necessary, A JEW A JEW.

"The present European conflict is but an expression of the World Jewish Problem—the frantic effort to establish Jewish Hegemony throughout the world. The guiding political power in America reposes in the hands of these Internationals.

"Appreciating these facts, I view as the greatest threat to American well-being today the effort being made to draw us into this war—either in Europe or Asia.

"IN COMMITTING MYSELF TO THIS PROGRAM I DO SO WITH FULL REALIZATION OF THE PERSONAL HAZARDS INVOLVED, CERTAINLY TO TAKE SUCH A STAND IS TO PLACE A PRICE ON MY HEAD; WILL RESULT IN UNSCRUPULOUS ATTACKS UPON MY CHARACTER AND UPON MY MOTIVES. YET THESE SACRIFICES I AM PREPARED TO ASSUME IF I MAY CONTRIBUTE SOME TANGIBLE RESISTANCE TO THAT INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT WHICH TODAY PREPARES TO MAKE BLOODY MERCHANDISE OF AMERICAN LIFE AND COMMONWEALTH.

"I have no affiliations or connections with any group whatsoever, and personally accept full responsibility for the statement herein contained, and for the statements which shall subsequently appear through my campaign." (signed).

In his supplementary circular of April 12, Mr. Brown, who receives

Edmondson reports, comments vigorously as follows:

"Why was this statement denied recognition in Oregon newspapers? By this

un-American act of suppression, Freedom of Speech is challenged.

"The news was suppressed because it dared to TELL THE TRUTH. No casual statement is this—THIS IS NEWS. It constitutes a terrible indictment, which, by its very nature and content, demands recognition—refutation, if it be false! acclaim, if it be true.

Suppression is not the American way. This reveals a Conspiracy of Silence on part of The Press and the news agencies to prevent MY MESSAGE

OF TRUTH FROM REACHING THE PEOPLE.

"Words of mine might lack conviction. BUT HERE YOU HAVE THE PROOF! Proof that news inimical to JEWISH design can be and is withheld from the American people. Who, then, controls our Press? To what low estate has the American Press descended?"

This typical western American farm youth, with high courage, superior intelligence, grim determination and super-audacity, lays his honor, his fortune and his life on the altar of country in a fearless American anti-war defi to the greatest subversive politico economic power ever confronting national patriotism.

Can we do less, and live with ourselves?

WAR OR PEACE FOR U.S.?

JEWISH WAR-CONTROL SET-UP (1914-18)

"Democracy" Washington Wilson Regime.

Wilson Administration Jew-controlled.

Wilson Chief Economic Advisor Bernard M. Baruch, who admitted he then had more war power than anyone.

Wilson Banker-Advisor, Henry Morgenthau, Sr., International Banker.

Wilson Political Advisor, Col. E. Mandel-House, Author of "Philip Dru."

Wilson-appointed Judicial Advisor U. S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, who proclaimed Jews to be a "nationality."

Wilson "Bolsheviki Defender," Felix Frankfurter, denounced by Theo. Roosevelt as Red.

Warcry: "Make the world safe for

JEWISH WAR-CONTROL SET-UP (1933-40)

"Democracy" Washington Roosevelt Regime.

Roosevelt Administration Jew Controlled— Brooklyn Jewish Examiner admits (10-20-33) it appointed more Jews than any other

Roosevelt Chief Economic Advisor Bernard M. Baruch, told a Senate Committee (3-27-35) that wars are now generally "caused by economic pressure;" favored U. S. force to keep European ideologies out of South America (St. Louis Post-Dispatch 11-1-38); called National Patriotism a "lot of nonsense" (Chicago Tribune 9-25-35).

Roosevelt Secretary of Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Dictator of Two Billion

Roosevelt "Right Arm" Advisor Justice Samuel I. Rosenman.

Roosevelt Publicist, Walter Lippmann.
Roosevelt New Deal "Father," Louis I.
Brandeis of the U.S. Supreme Court

Brandeis, of the U. S. Supreme Court, Zionist Leadership.

Prof." Felix Frankfurter, appointed to U. S. Supreme Court by Roosevelt.

Democracy!"

Look at the war set-ups at the top of this bulletin of October 24, 1939, and ask yourself whether or not power lies in alien hands to force America into the European Suicide War.

Addenda

JEWS BRINGING ON WAR?

In an American Hebrew article of June 3, 1938, partly quoted below, entitled "Will Eli, Eli Triumph Over Horst Wessel?," Germans hold lies proof of the Jewish intention to launch another world war.

"It has become patent that a Combination of Britain, France and Russia will sooner or later bar the triumphant march of Hitler.

"In France the Jew of prominence is Leon Blum. He may yet be the Moses who will lead foundering La Belle out of the wilderness. Maxim Litvinoff is the high-pressure gentleman who sold President Roosevelt on the recognition of the Soviet Govt. * * * He has been solely responsible for the formulation of Russian foreign policy. The English Jew of prominence is Leslie Hore-Belisha. Suave, slick and clever he, too, is a salesman. As Secretary of State for War, he is the focal point of Cabinet plans."

"Would it be unholy to suggest that these three nations, bound by numerous agreements, and in a state of virtual although undeclared alliance, will stand shoulder to shoulder to ward off the strides of Hitler to the East?

"WHEN THE SMOKE OF BATTLE clears there may be presented a tableau showing the man who played God, the swastika Christus, being lowered none too gently into a hole in the ground, as the trio of non-Aryans intone a ramified requiem—blending in grand finale into a militant, proud, aggresive arrangement of ELI, ELI!"

Former President David A. Brown of the American Hebrew told Robert Edward Edmondson in 1934: "We are going to bring a war on Germany."

WHO WANTS WAR? (Edmondson Broadcast of May 24, 1940)

Join the Allies or Perish! says Jewish Columnist Lippmann

"The most gigantic effort of which this country is capable may not be sufficient to protect the American people from finding themselves isolated and surrounded in a world of victorious aggressor-states.

"THE PLAIN, HARD, INDISPUTABLE TRUTH IS THAT THE CATASTROPHE CAN BE AVERTED ONLY BY THE SUCCESSFUL RESISTANCE OF THE ALLIES THIS SUMMER!

"Once outposts are in the hands of victorious, unfriendly, aggressive and hungry powers, we shall not be allowed the time to arm ourselves adequately even if it were possible, which it is not.

"ANY ATTEMPT TO CONCEAL THIS TRUTH IS AT BEST AN INNOCENT BUT A DANGEROUS IGNORANCE

"Therefore, it is not only necessary for us to see to it that the Allies have the weapons and the food with which to continue to resist, but that they do not lose the incentive to resist. THEY MUST BE TOLD THAT WE SHALL SUSTAIN THEIR RESISTANCE THIS SUMMER, AND THAT, IF THEY HOLD ON, THE ENORMOUS RESOURCES OF THIS COUNTRY WILL BE ORGANIZED AND THE PRODUCTS MADE AVAILABLE AS RAPIDLY AS POSSIBLE."—Walter Lippman in N. Y. Herald-Tribune 5-18-40.

KEEP OUT OF THE WAR. Says Col. Charles A. Lindbergh

"We are in danger of war today, not because European people have attempted to interfere with the internal affairs of America, but because American people have attempted to interfere with the internal affairs of Europe. Let us turn our eyes to our own nation. We cannot aid others until we have first placed our own country in a position of spiritual and material leadership and strength.

A foreign power could not conquer us by dropping bombs in this country unless the bombing were accompanied by an invading army; and an invading army requires thousands of small bombers and pursuit planes; it would have little use for huge trans-Atlantic aircraft. The advantage lies with us, for great armies must still cross oceans by ship.

"Out danger in America is an internal danger. We need not fear a foreign invasion unless American people bring it on through their own meddling with affairs abroad. The course we have been following in recent months leads to neither strength nor friendship nor peace. It will leave us hated by victor and vanquished alike. One side will claim we aided its enemies; the other, that we did not help enough.

"Let us turn to America's traditional role—that of building and guarding our own destiny. Above all, let us stop this HYSTERICAL CHATTER OF CALAMITY AND INVASION. If we desire peace, we need only stop asking for war. No one wishes to attack us, and no one is in a position to do so:

"The only reason that we are in danger of becoming involved in this war is because there are powerful elements in America who desire us to take part. THEY REPRESENT A SMALL MINORITY OF THE PEOPLE, BUT THEY CONTROL MUCH OF THE MACHINERY OF INFLUENCE AND PROPAGANDA. THEY SEIZE EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO PUSH US CLOSER TO THE EDGE. IT IS TIME FOR THE UNDERLYING CHARACTER OF THIS COUNTRY TO RISE AND STRIKE DOWN THESE ELEMENTS."—Col. Charles A. Lindbergh, Philadelphia Inquirer 5-20-40.

The inevitable first reaction to the above deadly parallel—The Question: WHO wants war? is answered! Under date of Oct. 3, 1936, the following was broadcast: In a pamphlet titled "Twenty Years of Social Pioneering," by the League of Industrial Democracy (Communistic), this appears: "Walter Lippman organized the Harvard Socialist Club."

DISCIPLES OF DISUNITY

The following was published July 8, 1940:

"Jews are the only cosmopolitan people. In this capacity they are ACTING as a SOLVENT of national differences."—From The London Jewish World 2-9-38.

UNITY implies solidarity. SOLVENT means an element that dissolves, disunites disorganizes, separates.

The nationally known rabbi, Dr. Solomon Goldman, of Chicago, President of the Zionist Organization of America, made the following accusation—absolutely false so far as concerns the undersigned and his patriotic Jew-exposure associates—in the N. Y. Times of July 1, 1940:

"In America, Anti-Semitism is the universal Fifth Column of Hitlerism. HE WHO IS AN ANTI-SEMITE IS A HITLERITE!"

An "anti-Semite" is he who is against the Jew-Semite—not the Arab-Semite. Let us get that race-duplicity clear. Let us also make it plain that patriots who are anti-Jewish are not against Jews AS SUCH, but against what the Jew Semites are DOING against The Republic and National Patriotism.

"HITLERISM" is the National Socialist Comprehensive Political Doctrine adopted in Germany for government of The Reich. According to the rabbi's reverse-thinking, American vigilante patriots who are Anti-Jewish are therefore advocates of Nazism FOR AMERICA. His biased comprehension seems to be utterly incapable (?) of grasping the fact that the Jewish subversions in Germany which caused Hitler's anti-Jewishness, repeated in America, were certain to create here similar anti-Jewish reactions WITHOUT IN ANY WAY ABSORBING THE OTHER MANY POLITICAL CONCEPTS OF THE NAZI PARTY.

Zionist Leader Herzl admits in his "Jewish State" that wherever Jews go in "perceptible numbers," there also anti-Semitism invariably occurs. In other words, Jewish intervention of itself causes anti-Jewishness.

Jews promote DISUNITY instead of National Unity, by refusing to assimilate and demanding special privilege, in violation of American political equality.

The reader might ask himself at this point, whether or not cosmopolitan Jews, acting as a solvent, are promoting national disunity in the interest of Internationalism

"Jews are among the trusted leaders of all revolutionary parties" admitted Rabbi Judah L. Magnus, of New York and Palestine, in the Jewish Forum of February, 1919. "Disciples of Disunity?"

Jewish Editor M. J. Olgin, quoted in the Congressional Record (6-25-34): "There is only one way to abolish the capitalistic state and that is to smash it by force! THAT MEANS CIVIL WAR!" Promoting Civil War is not productive of National Unity.

Whose solidarity and unity were supremely manifested in the 1934 N. Y. State gubernatorial election when the Democratic candidate was the Jew Lehman, the Republican nominee the Jew Moses, the Socialist aspirant the Jew Solomon, and Communist candidate the Jew Amter?

Instead of promoting the UNITY they preach, the record above suggests that Disciples of Disunity have been suicidally sowing an anti-racial hatred against themselves.

SAVE THE REPUBLIC!

"THE PROCESSES OF DEMOCRACY"

THE PRINCIPLES OF THE REPUBLIC

Following is a review of the illuminating "contents" of a 1918 booklet entitled "Back to the Republic" by Atwood, in which he compares "the process of democracy" with the principles of a republic, and from which publication was lifted bodily a substantial part of the U. S. Army Citizenship Training Manual of 1928, which has been suppressed by New Dealer Roosevelt, Disciple of Democracy and Disunity, because it officially announces that "The Government of the U. S. is NOT a democracy, but a REPUBLIC."

"The purpose of this book is to make clear the meanings of the words 'autocracy', democracy' and 'republic' It is a startling statement, but an indisputable fact, that in reviewing the centuries of history prior to the founding of The Republic of the U. S. A., we find no country to which the historian can point and truthfully say: There was a government that worked well. Following the adoption of the Constitution . . . there began the first great era of progress governmentally that the world had ever known.

"Gradually, however, we began to modify our national government through the appointment of boards and commissions, and the creation of various governmental agencies, making it impossible for the government to function in accord with the Plan of the Constitution, Demagogues and propagandists have kept up a constant campaign in various states for the initiative, referendum, recall, socialistic doctrines and anarchistic heresies.

"The men who established our government made a very marked distinction between a 'republic' and 'democracy,' and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic."

Author Gertrude Atherton, in "The Conqueror," quotes Alexander Hamilton: "Democracy is Poison!" Author Atwood reports him as saying: "The political principles of the people of this country (The U. S. A.) would endure nothing but republican government."

Atwood continues: "In an autocracy, authority is derived through heredity; in a democracy, authority is derived through mass-meetings, the initiative, the referendum, instructed delegates, or any other form of direct expression. In a republic, authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials to represent them.

The addude of autocracy roward property is feudalistic. The attitude of democracy toward property is communistic or socialistic. The attitude of the republic toward property is that of individual ownership, resulting in thrift, respect for law, individual rights, and orderly, sensible economic procedure.

The attitude of autocracy toward law, is that the will of the royal ruler shall prevail; the attitude of democracy toward law is that the will of the majority shall prevail; the attitude of the republic toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence.

"There is no such thing as a representative democracy. The very essence of democracy is that the people speak direct. There is no such thing as a democratic republic. The very essence of a republic is that the people speak through representativs. There is no such thing as a democratic autocracy. Too little participation by the people means autocracy: too much participation by the people means democracy.

"The extreme of autocracy results in tyranny, oppression, reaction; the other extreme of democracy results in demagogism, discontent, anarchy and chaos. The Golden Mean of a republic, strictly and literally adhered to, results in statesmanship, liberty, arbitration, justice and progress. The Constitution provides for absolutely strict representative government, and gives the people no voice in the solution of governmental problems saving that of electing representatives to work out the problems. It is a fundamental fact that the people generally know comparatively little about governmental problems."

Author Atwood quotes from an address by Nicholas Murray Butler, President of New York's Columbia University, before the Commercial Club of St. Louis, Nov. 27, 1911, published later under the title: "Why Should We Change Our Form of Government," in which he said:

"There is under way a definite and determined movement to change our representative republic into a socialistic democracy." The Central Conference of American Rabbis, in a 1936 resolution, demanded that "a thoroughly socialized democracy" be substituted for our republician form of government (See N. Y. Times 9-13-36).

Atwood defines "the initiative that phase of democracy which makes it possible for the mob, under the leadership of the demagogue, to enact legislation; the referendum is that phase of democracy which assumes that the minority should rescind impulsively at a special election the deliberate action of the majority at a regular election; the judicial recall is that phase of democracy which makes it possible to take a case from the court-room, where it may be decided in accordance with the law and the evidence, to the street corners, where the agitators may appeal to passion and prejudice.

"Demagogues have substituted Personality for Principle, Preachment for Practice, Pretense for Performance, Agitation for Achievement, Experiment for Execution and Coercion for the Constitution."

WALTER WINCHELL LIFS

(Open Letter to Columnist Walter Winchell, July 15, 1940)

In your N. Y. Mirror of July 8, 1940, you give me some free advertising, and I hereby write my thanks for the publicity because it is already bearing good fruit for the Crusade against Jewish anti-Americanism even though apparently published with smear-malice aforethought.

A respected western correspondent ironically writes: "We heard last Sunday over the air waves kosher-America's No. 1 mouthpiece, Walter Winchell. Mr. and Mrs. America were hysterically warned about poisonous propaganda emanating from the Pocono Mountains, around Stoddartsville, Penna. The 'hill-billy' press must be becoming effective when a national hook-up is used to warn our innocent public about it. It must surely have attained significance. Congratulations on your prominence!"

You report that I am much interested in stopping the firearms registration bill before Congress, which you say would "DISARM many who have no reason to carry guns." I'm glad you used that correct word "disarm," since it is omitted from the measure.

There are several good reasons why I would not like to see the unconstitutional gun-registration measure pass, among which is the fact that, if enacted, it would enable Key Jews in government control-positions to frame citizens and take away their rifles, pistols, etc., "disarming" them, as you say, and leaving them defenseless when Jewish Communists are ready to try to seize The Republic by force.

Said Communists don't dare to act now. There are too many "White Terror" vigilantes just around the corner protected by the "keep and bear arms" right guaranteed by the Constitution.

You say Attorney General Jackson has urged the bill as an aid to national defense. What a farce! How would national defense be promoted by disarming nationals—citizens—of The Republic?

You smearingly allege that "This man Edmondson carries on his campaign in Stoddartsville, Pa., BECAUSE in New York a few years ago he was indicted by a Grand Jury on charges brought by Mayor LaGuardia and others." You failed to tell the whole story.

It was a Grand JEWRY that indicted the defendant, for two-thirds of the personnel were Jews, headed by a Jew foreman. You also neglected to mention the fact that the false charge of "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion" was unconditionally dismissed May 10, 1938, "in furtherance of justice."

However, for your information, primarily I came here for family health reasons—justified by subsequent recovery. Futilely waiting in New York City months after dismissal, ready to take on more Jews offering combat, I was very glad to come to an American Gentile community, preferring such environment to the New York Ghetto.

"The dear old American Civil Liberties Union went to Edmondson's defense, and saved him," you falsely comment. Roger N. Baldwin, Director of the "dear old ACLU," wrote Sept. 18, 1936, to Judge N. W. Rogers of Tompkins Corners, N. Y., saying:

"We have discussed very fully our attitude to the prosecution of Edmondson. We have conferred with his counsel, and looked up the law. When the indictment was first brought it was, in our judgment, clearly a case violative of the free speech guarantee, for, unlike ordinary criminal libel cases, it did not specify persons libeled. The indictment was later changed to specific complaints, and thus the defect was cured." The matter was thereupon dropped by the ACLU.

Defense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr., wrote Judge Rogers Oct. 1, 1936, saying Baldwin had NOT conferred with him, as stated; and the religion indictment was NEVER CHANGED; which of course put Jewish Fellow-Traveler Baldwin in the Ananias Club.

BUT, and here's a big "but" because, becoming alarmed regarding its looseness, it then pleaded with the court for "dismissal of indictment because prosecutions like this tend to restrict traditional freedom of speech and press." So much for the "dear old ACLU."

But, watch your step, Winchell, particularly in venturing to say that "Edmondson is up to the same tricks which resulted in his indictment." I do plead guilty, however, to such "tricks" as truthfully exposing, through well-documented power-publicity on a scale greater than ever before, how Jews are trying to destroy The Republic with their poisonous Communistic Democracy.

Now, any independent Gentile journalist would publish also this rebuttal. but whoever heard of Walter Winchell in the role of a straight-shooter?

JEWISH INCOMPETENCE UNMASKED

"Jewish understanding does not look beyond today and tomorrow, operating destructively and suicidally in all directions. The Jewish mode of thinking is inorganic, and is, for that reason, incapable of creative action. The Jew is unable to conceive that the world dominion for which he is striving, would mean simultaneous world ruin."—From the book "The Riddle of the Jews' Success," a revelation of Materialism in Action.

Here is the record per Edmondson Bulletin of 8-14-40):

Jews achieved complete politico-economic mastery of rich Russia, through Trotsky, Kaganowitsch, Litvinoff, Zinoviev, Radek, Kamanev, Yaroslavsky et al. What happened?

RUSSIA WAS WRECKED!

Jews mastered Germany via Rathenau, Marx, Lassalle, Liebknecht, Eisner. Haase, Preuss, Ballin et al. What happened?

GERMANY WAS WRECKED!

Jews gained control of Spain through Rosenberg, Bela Kun, Azana, and a host of Soviet Jews. What happened?

SPAIN WAS WRECKED! (Jew-freed by Gentile Franco, Spain is gradnally recovering through National Patriotism).

Jews moved into and dominated Poland, which they called "The Heart of the Jewish Diaspora." What happened?

POLAND IS NO MORE! after being forced into war.

Jews mastered France through the Rothschilds, Blum, Mandel, Dreyfus. Levy, Denain, Lazarus, et al., with their Secret Order of the Grand Orient. What happened?

FRANCE HAS FALLEN!

Jews gained control of Rumania through King Carol's mistress Lupescu. What happened?

RUMANIA IS FINISHED!

Jews bored into and seized control of the wealth of the British Empire through Barney Barnato's African gold and diamonds, Sassoon's Oriental opium. Disraeli's Suez Canal grab, Lord Reading's Indian rule, Lord Melchett's nickel monopoly, the Samuels, Waley-Cohens, Israel Moses Sieffs, Hore Belishas and so on ad nauseum. What happens?

THE BRITISH EMPIRE IS BANKRUPT'

Jews have seized the U. S. Economic Dynamo of New York and the Political Power Center of Washington, directing America's destiny through Baruch, Brandeis, Morgenthau, Lehman, LaGuardia, Goldenweiser, Strauss, Sabath, Filene, Bullitt, Dickstein, Rosenman, Swope, Ezekiel, Margold, Hillman, and thousands of others of the tribe in key-positions throughout the Roosevelt Jew Deal administration. What is happening?

THE JEW DEAL IS WRECKING THE NATION THROUGH INEX-TINGUISHABLE DEBT AND WAR-MONGERING ACTIVITIES

Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel, in his book "You Gentiles," defiantly confesses: "We Jews are destroyers even in those instruments of destruction to which we turn for relief."

What an admission—not only of Gross Incompetence, but utter lack of creative ability! Verily "Jewish thinking is inorganic, incapable of creative action, operating destructively AND SUICIDALLY in all directions."

"AMERICAN REPUBLIC MODEL BEST"

Complimentary to Boy Scout Camps in the Potonos, members of the summer colony at Stoddartsville, Penna., were guests on Friday night of Misses Lulie and Laura Stal, at their family homestead, "The Maples." Robert Edward Edmondson, public relations counsel of New York and Pennsylvania was speaker, and a patriotic flag salute was

featured.

Speaking on "Save the Republic," Mr. Edmonsdon said in part

"You scouts know that we Americans live in a Republic, but many of our fellow-countrymen, misled by false internationalist propaganda, are calling the United States a democracy under the impression that democracy means the same as republic. You should correct that idea.

"If you will look at your dictionary you will see that democracy is the opposite extreme of autocracy, from which our forefathers who established this republic successfully freed themselves by revolution, to set up, not a democracy, but a republic.

"James Madison, one of the ablest of the framers of the United States Constitution, during the time the great document was in process of formation, made the following statement: "Democracies have ever been the scenes of turbulence and contention; have ever been incompatible with personal security or right of property."

"His compatriots agreed, and set up a constitutional republic, which is the golden mean mid-way between the extremes of autocracy and democracy. The despotism of the latter is often more ruthless than the tyranny of the former. The will of the majority rules a democracy, whereas in our republic, justice is administered by fixed principles of right which protect minorities as well as majorities.

"You will not find the word democracy in either the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, Washington's Farewell Address, or Lincoln's Gettysburg classic appeal to prevent government of, by and for the people from perishing. And the U.S. War Department's Citizenship Training Manual of 1928 teaches American soldiers that "The Government of the U.S. is not a democracy but a republic."

"With the foregoing you should be able to convince any good American that we live in a republic: but if further evidence is needed. I refer again to the dictionary, which says that 'social democracy' was invented by the father of Communism, Karl Marx, and his fellow-travelets.

"Article 4, Section 4, of the Constitution reads: "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a republican form of government." Hence we are a compound republic; and that is why the flag salute reads: I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the U. S. of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for All."

"Usurpers have sought to destroy our protective system of checks-and-balances by a communizing process labeled 'lemocracy. In these days of peril we should be more on guard than ever to protect traditional Americanism from alien labels and foreign ideologies of all kinds. The American model is unique and unlike other so-called republics, and it is the best government on earth. We should be prepared to defend it against all comers."

COMMUNIZING U. S. BY STEALTH

The following was an Edmondson broadcast of September 17, 1940:

After being taken for a Hemisphere Ride, the so-called legal lights of the American Bar Association convention in Philadelphia, were lectured by Jewish Prof. K. Lowenstein of Amherst College as to how "American democracy" should be saved from the fate of European democracies, through the adoption of "comprehensive Federal legislation," as outlined in an article printed in the N. Y. Times of Sept. 12, 1940, from which the following is taken:

• "(1) Sharpening of provisions against sedition, sabotage and espionage.

• "(2) Suspension and dissolution of ANTI-DEMOCRATIC parties, groups and associations, even in the camouflaged form of cultural and social activities. The 'clear and present danger' criterion of the U. S. Supreme Court should be modified in that ANTI-DEMOCRATIC tendencies, or the structure of a group, if authoritarian as to the election and control of its officials, should be deemed sufficient for REPRESSIVE MEASURES.

• "(3) Prohibition of militarization of political parties or groups, including legislation against wearing of uniforms.

• "(4) CURBING OF THE EXCESSIVE USE OF THE FREEDOM OF PUBLIC EXPRESSION when used with malicious intent for disparaging DEMOCRATIC institutions, or for incitement to hatred and contempt of some classes of the population—Jews, bankers, freemasons, etc. Dissemination of racial discord is always the forerunner of fifth-column activities."

The foregoing recommendations of this Jewish leader to the American Bar Association Convention are tantamount to an argument for the repeal of the Bill of Rights, especially as regards Freedom of Speech and of The Press, without which free men cannot remain free.

PATRIOTIC APPEAL TO "CAPTAINS OF INDUSTRY"

Open Letter, October 1, 1940, from Robert Edward Edmondson to-

Henry Ford, Detroit; Alfred P. Sloan, Jr., Chairman General Motors Corpn.; M. J. Heinz, Chairman Heinz Pickle Co.; E. T. Weir, Prest. Weirton Steel Co.; John Henry Kirby of Texas; George M. Moffett, Prest. Corn Products Co.; J. Howard Pew, Jr., Prest. Sun Oil Co.; A. Atwater Kent, Prest. Atwater-Kent Radio Co.; James F. Bell, Chairman General Mills Co.; Congressman John C. Schafer of Wisconsin; Senator Robert R. Reynolds of N. C.; Raymond Pitcairn, Philadelphia.

Your names are smearingly mentioned as "American Merchants of Hate" in the mushroom publicity organs of the Jewish Internationale, See "Friday" of Sept. 27, 1940. Don't overlook "Fortune," "Life," "Ken," "Time" and others.

The root inspiration of the "American Merchants of Hate" title is found in that insensate Hate with which the Champion Haters of History have been inciting America into an emotional debauch to throw this nation into war against the totalitarian states.

The time is fast approaching when outraged patriots will inevitably hale Jewish character assassination publications to court because monopolized publicity has put its false Nazist, Fascist and Fifth Column smear-terms within the jurisdiction of libel damage laws. For conviction on this legal point read the Penal Code of the State of New York, wherein most of the offending magazines live and have their being. Section 1340 provides:

"Any malicious publication . . . which exposes any living person to HATRED, CONTEMPT, ridicule or obloquy, or tends to cause any person to be shunned, or has a tendency to INJURE any person, is LIBEL."

The above protective phrases of the Law of Libel can now obviously be invoked by yourselves and active Jew-exposure individuals also blacklisted—by "Friday," viz. Gen. George Van Horn Moseley, Gen. Robert M. Brookfield, Rev. Gerald B. Winrod, Rev. Charles E. Coughlin, Congressman Jacob Thorkelson, James True, George Deatherage, Col. H. A. Jung and many others scandalously attacked.

"Friday" says that Deatherage returned from the 1937 World Anti-Jew Congress held in Europe—which I understand he did not attend—and delivered "an important message to Robert Edward Edmondson, key-pamphleteer of the Anti-Semitic Fifth Column." Deatherage never delivered any such message to me.

The article goes on to say that "American anti-Semities are inseparably linked with Nazi Germany"—which is untrue as regards my output, since most of such publicity documentation came from British and French politico-economic sources, and is neither "racial" nor "religious" in character.

Neither is the Edmondson Agency "backed by some of the most powerful and influential men in America"—I wish it were, since there is a limit at which patience, as well as tolerance, ceases to be a virtue.

Men of Wealth: Do you want more concrete evidence of Jewish Treason To The Republic? Here is revolution and war-confession documentation—

"The only way to induce the American President (Wilson) to come into the war was to secure the co-operation of American Zionists by promising them Palestine. The Zionists carried out their part and helped to bring America into the World War."—S. Landman, Jewish War Propaganda Agent of Britain (See London Jewish Chronicle 2-7-36).

"Our propaganda will aim at attaching the support of important American sections, such as the Jews. Our propagandists during the World War succeeded in embroiling the U. S. with Germany." From "Propaganda in the Next War" book of 1939 by Sidney Rogerson, British subject.

"What Jewish Idealism and Jewish Discontent so powerfully contributed to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities are tending to produce in other countries."—American Hebrew 9-10-20.

"No agitators did more to bring in the German revolution of 1848 than the two Jews, Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne. It was a Jew, Leon Trotsky, who led the Red Army which saved the Communist Cause in Russia. It was a Jew, Karl Liebknecht, aided by a Jewess, Rosa Luxemburg, who led the Spartacist Revolution in Germany. It was a Jew, Bela Kun, who set up the Red Regime in Hungary."—From the book "How Odd of God," by Former Rabbi Lewis Browne.

"Jews are to be found among the trusted leaders and routine workers of all revolutionary parties."—N. Y. Rabbi Judah L. Magnes, in Jewish Forum of February, 1919.

"When we Jews sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat—officers of all revolutionary parties; when we rise, there arises also our terrible power of the purse. The Jewish Question is no more a social than a religious one. It is a National Question, which can only be solved by making it a political world question. The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews iive in perceptible numbers. We naturally move to those places where we are not persecuted, and there our presence produces anti-Semitism."—From "The Jewish State" by Theodor Herzl, regarded as one of the greatest Jews.

"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny and played havoc with them. We are at the bottom, not merely of your last Great War, but nearly all your wars. We have brought discord, confusion and frustration into your personal and public life—We are still doing it; we did it with the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas AND PROPAGANDA."—From "The Real Case Against the Jews" by Marcus Eli Ravage, Jewish author (January, 1928, Century Magazine).

"We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany."—President David A. Brown of the American Hebrew, predicted to Robert Edward Edmondson of New York in the presence of witnesses, during the summer of 1934.

There is a Jewish Conspiracy against all nations . . . a double assault of Jewish revolution and Jewish finance."—From La Vieille France, of June 15, 1929, widely quoted in British publications.

"We Jews are destroyers, Jews will remain destroyers forever. Between Gentiles and Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf. It is abysmal. Nothing you can do will meet our demands."—From the book "You Gentiles," by Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel.

"WARS ARE JEWS' HARVESTS," says Prof. Werner Sombart, in his "Jews & Modern Capitalism" book.

While the documented Jewish confession record is practically endless, I rest my accusation-case here, since if you gentlemen are not converted to defense-action by the foregoing "samples," it would be a waste of time to try to move you to—RESCUE THE REPUBLIC! While its outer shell has rotted, its blinded core is sound and worthy.

The Hour is Grave! And the Time of Decision is at hand!

Robert Edward Edmondyon

MASS-CASE PROSECUTION GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

In an attempted but futile justification of the indictment charges, the mass-case prosecution declared that Defendant Edmondson's publications contained the following "offenses:"

That President Roosevelt is a warmonger and a pawn of Jews and Communists and is draining dry the resources of the U. S. to save Communist Russia and China.

That President Roosevelt is a Jew and is working with International Jewry against the interests of the people of the U. S.

That public officials of the U. S. are controlled by Communists and International Jews.

That acts of public officials are illegal, corrupt and traitorous, and in violation of the U. S. Constitution.

That President Roosevelt forced the Axis powers to wage war on the U.S.

That war is the result of a Jew-sponsored monetary scheme to assure world domination by International Jewry and Communists.

Admitting that some of the foregoing allegations were true in substance, Defendant Edmondson states that his publications were all "addressed to the American People" to inform them of danger, with honest belief in the truth of the supporting matter published with the good motive of patriotic defense of the U. S. against enemy action; and he prepared as rebuttal "exhibits" the documented record below with reasonable interpretations thereof.

"OVERT" SOCIALISTIC IMPLICATIONS WHY ROOSEVELT IS UNFIT FOR RE-ELECTION

Following is an Edmondson Bulletin published February 12, 1940

A Third Term would be un-American, according to tradition and precedent..
FDR has overloaded the Nation with unprecedented and inextinguishable

(3) He has usurped the constitutional functions of the Legislative and Judicia

Departments of Government.

(4) His Hull regime has broken down U. S. foreign trade and by "economic sanc-

(5) He has repudiated practically all platform pledges.

• (6) He has subverted the American people with an enormous political bureaucracy.
• (7) He has Communistically regimented and Fascistically centralized political power.
  • (8) He has been repeatedly unneutral in connection with the war in Europe.
• (9) He "recognized" the Soviet murder regime, and congratulated it on its anniversaries.
  • (10) He has socialistically "packed" and Frankfurterized the U. S. Supreme Court
• (1)) He has kept unemployment at peak during seven long lean years, raised the cost of living to labor by crop destruction and wiped out working capital by confiscatory taxation.
• (12) He has devalued our dollar, repudiated national contracts, and elevated alien international Morgenthau interests to supreme domination of the U. S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Monetary System.
• (13) He has violated the cardinal American principle of separation of Church and State by calling for closer relationship between Religion and Government.
• (14) He has regimented the press and censored radio free speech, in violation of the American Bill of Rights.
• (15) In deliberate suppression of American MAJORITY RIGHTS and to perpetuate his regime, he has created a powerful partisan "relief" and office-holding MINORITY.
• (16) He has "selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration in American History," according to the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933.
• (17) He has tried to convert The Republic into a rabbinical "thoroughly socialized democracy." which is communistic.
• (18) And in consideration of all these anti-American acts he has accepted three medals for anti-American "Distinguished Services to Jewry."

"The strongest Third Term Roosevelt sentiment I found after a canvas of the Nation, was among the Jewish group."—Columnist Raymond Clapper in N. Y. World Telegram of February 2, 1940.

The Tennessee Valley Authority enterprise was approved by President Roosevelt, May 18, 1933, with David Lilienthal the Jewish Director. It has been pronounced by Socialist Presidential Candidate Norman Thomas as the most socialistic of New Deal projects.

"The Rabbinical Assembly favors the general tendency of recently adopted SOCIAL legislation, and in particular approves the scope of the TVA, IT ENDORSES THE PRESIDENT'S PLAN FOR THE REORGANIZATION OF THE U. S. SUPREME COURT."—Jewish "Day" May 11, 1937.

"ROOSEVELT," a 1938 book by Emil Ludwig (Jew), friend and admirer of Franklin D. Roosevelt, says Roosevelt has been transforming the Republic of the U. S. A. into "a semi-socialist state."

Roosevelt demanded that Congress pass the National Recovery Act. It did. Congressman Louis T. McFadden, (Congressional Record of May 3, 1934) says NRA was the socialistic "Freedom and Planning" scheme (PEP) of Britain conceived by Israel Moses Siet, a Jewish merchant, and states that PEP was introduced to the New Deal by Boston Jewish Merchant Edward A. Filene, who financed it until the U. S. Government took it over. McFadden held PEP to be directly opposed to the constitutional form of government, and said it was "The Jewish Plan of The World State."

"The underlying philosophy (socialistic) of the New Deal is the philosophy of Justice Louis D. Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court" reported the N. Y. Times of June 28, 1934.

F.D.R. "Next Communist President"

"At the time of my visit to Russia the presidential campaign of 1932 was in full swing. In many places in Russia 1 saw . . . pictures of Roosevelt entitled 'The Next Communist President of the U. S.' "—Carveth Wells, Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society, member American Geographical Society, member of Explorers Club of N. Y.

"Communism is the Goal," is a statement made in the Harvard Class Book of April, 1935, by Roger Baldwin, National Director of the Frankfurter American Civil Liberties Union, communist-aiding organization. He was outlining aims. The Penn. Director of the ACLU is quoted as having said that its program was adopted by the New Deal Party.

"We challenge the present social system. We advocate SOCIALIZATION of basic enterprises. There is only ONE way in which the American people can escape Fascism and

Communism and that is by establishing a THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEM-OCRACY."—Resolution by the great Central Conference of American Rabbis, reported by N. Y. Times of Sept. 13, 1936. Roosevelt has continually praised the activities of this rabbi conference, which, in turn, has endorsed most of his important policies.

William J. Goodman of N. Y. City, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee against neutrality revision, according to the Brooklyn Tablet of May 13, 1938. He said: "We find ourselves, without any voice in the matter, lined up on the side of Communism. There CAN be no communion with Communism on the part of the American Republic."

July 5, 1935, President Roosevelt wrote to the Chairman of a sub-committee of the House Ways & Means Committee relative to a socialistic pending bill: "I hope your committee will not permit doubts as to CONSTITUTIONALITY, however reasonable, to block the suggested legislation." (See Congressional Record, Vol. 79, P. 14363)

"Step by Step, we have moved from being a Republic toward becoming an unlimited Democracy,"—Editorially said the Saturday Evening Post of Aug. 24, 1940, in an analysis of democracy-promotion by the Roosevelr New Deal Administration.

Prof. Felix Frankfurter, born in Austria. widely known as Harvard's "Karl Marx Professor," (denounced in a letter of Dec. 19, 1917, as Bolshevistic, by President Theodore Roosevelt) who was the most prominent member of the Communistic aiding American Civil Liberties Union, was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt Jan. 5, 1939, as a member of the U. S. Supreme Court, Associate Justice.

Roosevelt backed the Child Labor Admendment to the Constitution, and supported Jewish Governor Lehman of N. Y. and Jewish Governor Horner of Illinois in their attempts in 1934-35 to have state legislatures endorse it. The Communist Daily Worker ardently advocated adoption. The amendment is "completely subversive of our form of government—ir is socialistic," declared Former Senator James A. Reed of Missouri.

"OUR GOVERNMENT IS A DEMOCRACY" declared President Roosevelt in his Message to the Nation June 24, 1938. In December, 1938, he proclaimed "We are not only the largest and most powerful democracy, but other democracies look to us for leadership, that world democracy may survive. (N. Y. Times, Dec. 6, 1938).

"Our country is goin to be . . . THE ARSENAL OF DEMOCRACY" . . . From a speech by Roosevelt before the White House Correspondents Association at a banquet in Washington, at which he referred to the United States as "a democracy" seventeen time. (N.Y. Ametican, 3-16-40.)

The N. Y. World Telegram Columnist Westbrook Pegler said Sept. 12, 1940: "Never was a people so gulled as Americans by the word 'democracy.' Democracy contains the process by which American freedom can be repealed utterly."

On July 24, 1942, Roosevelt's Attorney-General in the Dept. of Justice, ordered arrested for sedicious conspiracy under the Alien Registration Act of 1940, 28 men and women who had been indicted July 21, 1942, by a Washington grand jury, for attacking and exposing Communism and Jewish anti-Americanism.

"Democracy has failed, failed miserably; shown itself to be incompetent, fumbling, roo slow, too ignorant, too paralyzed by its own politics, a tragic victim of internal weakness."—Columnist Raymond Clapper, N. Y. World-Telegram June 11, 1940.

The following points were advocated by New Deal Jewish Prof. K. Lowenstein, of Amhetst College, before the American Bar Assn., in Philadelphia Convention:—"Sharpen the provisions against sedition; suspend anti-democratic groups; prohibit militant political parties: CURB THE PRESS!"—N. Y. Times, Sept. 14, 1940.

In "Zionism & World Politics," Jewish Author Horace Meyer Kallen, says: "The strongest authoritative voice of Internationalism is that of the Jew, Karl Marx (Communist): its most heroic practical defender, the Jew Ferdinand LaSalle (Socialist); its unsung root, the economic doctrine of the Jew, David Lasser."

In December, 1940, "Opinion," Rabbi Wise's monthly magazine, under a heading "Jews Will Defend Democracy," James Waterman Wise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise, Roose-velt partisan, writes as follows: "In one thing Hitler is right—WE JEWS ARE THE ARCH-DEMOCRATS OF HISTORY."

In 1937 Roosevelt proposed to enlarge the U. S. Supreme Court. Syndicate Writer Paul Mallon reported that the "packing plan" had been engineered by Roosevelt's "Right Atm" and State Paper Composer N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosenman.

"Remove Army Officers"

Prize-Winner Rabbi Victor Eppstein, in a contest on "The Best Way To Combat Anti-Semitism," published by "Opinion," Rabbi Wise's monthly magazine of April, 1937, made the following proposition: "American democracy must be SOCIALIZED. Energetic

measures must be adopted by strengthening the organization of labor and by systematically REMOVING from key positions in ARMY AND NATIONAL GUARD ALL OFFICERS WHOSE LOYALTY TO THE CONSTITUTION MAY BE QUALIFIED BY CLASS ALLEGIANCE." Rabbi Wise has been a strong partisan of Roosevelt.

Roosevelt has repeatedly endorsed the communistic CIO, which was organized by the Jews Sidney Hillman, David Dubinsky and Max Zaritsky of N. Y. City. The N. Y. Times of August 14, 1938, printed this from Washington, D. C.; "John P. Frey, Vice President, American Federation Activities said roday Communists hold many key positions in the CIO. He listed 280 alleged Communists as holding such positions.

"In the fight against reaction the mobilizing of the Jewish people to defeat anti-Semitism is an INTEGRAL part. We have organized a series of mass meetings, all of which were held in synagogues with the active support of the rabbis."—From the "Party Organizer" of the Central Committee of the Communist Party in the USA, June, 1938, issue, New Dealer partisan.

"Jews who deny that many Jews are Communists are jockeying themselves into the position of citizens on tolerance. If, by taking full part in the forging of this united front (against Fascism), the Jews of America write themselves down as COMMUNISTS—So Be It!"—So wrote James Waterman Wise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise, strong backer of Roosevelt, in the Communistic "New Masses" Magazine of October 29, 1935.

"If the American Nation ever gets the idea that the Jewish tace and Communism are synonymous, there is the possibility of a pogrom in the U. S. that will make those of the Czar's era look like a small parade."—James W. Gerard, formerly Ambassador from the U. S. to Germany, as reported in the N. Y. Times of October 4, 1934.

The American Hebrew, F.D.R. partisan, Sept. 10, 1920, said: "The Bolshevist Revolution was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking and discontent. What Jewish Idealism and discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind and heart are tending to promote IN OTHER COUNTRIES."

London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy, in his preface to "The World Significance of the Russian Revolution" by Pirt-Rivers, 1920, says: "Jewish elements provide the driving force for both Communism and Capitalism."

British Author Hilaire Belloc in his 1923 book "The Jews" says: "The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction, is in the hands of Jewish agents."

"Social Democracy" or Communism, to use the Webster Dictionary definitions, was organized by the Jew Karl Marx and the Jew Ferdinand Lassalle, in 1848; reorganized in 1864; again in 1871 and put over in 1911-18 in Russia by Jewish revolutionaries.

That socialism is Jewish is made plain by N. H. Bialik, celebrated in Jewty as its greatest poet, in an address at Hebrew University, Jerusalem, May 11, 1933, teproduced in a Christian Church publication "Lines of Communication," in July, 1933; the following description being employed by Bialik: "Judaism went forth into the great world. I once compared it to an army going to war—a movable state. It is they who in principle are the CREATORS OF LIBERALISM. DEMOCRACY. SOCIALISM AND COMMUNISM."

A booklet exposing Communism, entitled "America's Great Menace," was circulated in New York City in 1934 by B. A. M. Schapiro, who styled himself "A Christian by Faith, a Jew by Race." In it he confessed: "I meet the communists in their hunting grounds in Union Square, N. Y. City. 'How will you start the revolution here?' I ask them in their own language. 'We Communists will work underground, and use the same methods that brought abour the Russian Revolution.' The time has come when patriotic Jews of America should feel the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) hatched and planned IN THE CAMP OF ISRAEL."

"If the Jew wishes to survive he must identify himself with the historic movement of Communism."—Michael Alper, in Rabbi S. S. Wise's magazine "Opinion," Nov., 1934.

N. Y. Jewish Mayor LaGuardia told delegates to the National Convention of the Independent Order of Abraham in N. Y. City, according to the N. Y. American of June 8, 1937: "Many of the New Deal principles of government and economics were established thousands of years ago in Mosaic and Talmudic Law."

In the 1930 book "The Alien In Our Midst," by Charles Stewart Davison and Madison Grant, the former, a prominent New York lawyer, said: "We were instituted as a republic. Through steady increase of aliens we have dangerously verged toward mobrule—democracy. The theory of representative government is NOT a democratic theory. It is a republican theory. IT DENIES DEMOCRACY!"

In his 1918 book, "Back To The Republic," Harry F. Atwood says: "The attitude of democracy toward property is communistic or socialistic. There is no such thing as a democratic republic. The very essense of a republic is that the people speak through representatives."

The public press reported President Roosevelt as saying to delegates to the 1940 National Democratic Convention in Chicago who asked for guidance: "CLEAR IT WITH SIDNEY!"—Referring to Sidney Hillman, Jewish President of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers Union of New York City, notoriously "Red."

"I see no inconsistency between the Philosophy of Communism and Principles of Democratic Government."—Herbett Benjamin, Communist Lender of the Workers Alliance, Vol. 1, Page 136, WPA Congressional Committee investigation, House of Representatives, 76th Congress, First Session.

ROOSEVELT NEW DEAL MONETARY SUBVERSIONS

Disregarding Art. 1, Sec. 8. Par. 5, endowing Congress with the sole power to create money "and regulate the value thereof," President Roosevelt, on March 9, 1933, took the United States off the gold standard, relieving the Federal Reserve Banking System of its obligation to pay out gold to United States Citizens BUT STILL PERMITTING INTERNATIONAL FINANCIERS TO WITHDRAW GOLD AND SHIP IT ABROAD—giving a monopoly of the yellow metal. On June 9, 1933, the gold payment clause in public and private contracts was officially repudiated by the New Deal Administration, and with it went national honor.

The Roosevelt Administration on Jan. 31, 1934, in violation of Art. I, Sec. 8, Par. 5, devalued the United States dollar from par to 59,06c to "counter inflation," which is still here. Later, a 2-billion dollar secret "Stabilization Fund" for manipulation of INTERNATIONAL FINANCE was set up with the President and his Secretary of the Treasury as Tewish dictators.

Washington Correspondent George Rothwell Brown wrote in the N. Y. American of June 28, 1935: "The whole New Deal crazy quilt seems to have a distinct pattern once the premise is accepted that astronomical expenditures have been made, not for relief public works recovery, BUT FOR THE DELIBERATE PURPOSE OF CREATING DEBT."

The Roosevelt New Deal regime raised the national debt of the United States from twenty five to over two hundred million dollars in ten years. High authorities declare in to be unpayable.

Arthur Kitson, independent British economist, who denounced the gold standard system, declared in the National Review of London, March, 1935, in an analysis of the Jewish International Banking Monopoly, "The sole aim of the international financiers is world-control by the creation of inextinguishable debt."

The Jew Paul M. Warburg, was "Father of the Federal Reserve Bank System" of the U. S. (See letter of Jan. 29, 1927, to N. Y. Post, by Jewish Prof. E. A. Seligman.) His son James P. Warburg, international banker, was one of the first members of the "Roosevelt Supreme Council" or Brain Trust. In this connection observe the following from the American Hebrew Weekly of Sept. 10, 1920: "The Jew evolved organized capitalism, with its working instrumentality, the banking system."

The following is from the Northampton, England, Daily Echo of March 19, 1925: "Jews can destroy empires by means of finance. Jews are International. Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the British Empire ever had to face,"—Statement by Walter Crick, British manufacturer.

(Edmondson met Mr. Crick in New York in the early days of the patriotic crusade. Upon his request Mr. Crick sent for and obtained from England invaluable Jewish exposure data for U. S. publication, including rare books, documents and other papers.)

"Paul M. Warburg, born in Germany, practically controls the financial policy of the Wilson Administration," wrote British Ambassador Spring-Rice on Nov. 13, 1914—adding: "Since J. P. Morgan, Sr., died, Jewish bankers are supreme in the U. S."

"There has not been an administration since our advent into the great World War in which Bernard M. Baruch (Jewish speculator) has not been a chief political, economic and financial advisor—and every administration that listened to him has carried us deeper and deeper into financial chaos."—Chairman Louis T. McFadden of the House Finance Committee, Congressional Record of June 27, 1934.

Read the following from 1933 October "Fortune," the Jewish tycoon magazine Bernard M. Baruch is called into frequent conferences with the President. HE HAS

FINANCED many a Congressional campaign; and is surrounded by a practorian guard of senators, WHO HANG ON HIS EVERY WORD. The figure of Baruch is swelling into enormous proportions on the horizon of public life, He is THE MYSTERY MAN of Washington and Wall Street."

If the foregoing record does not supply ample evidence of FDR socialist-communist-democracy-monetary conspiracy, what does?

ROOSEVELT WARMONGERING

Gen. Hugh S. Johnson wrote in the Philadelphia Inquirer of June 18, 1940, solemnly warning!--

"There is no longer any question that Mr. Roosevelt is exercising no effort whatever to keep us out of war. It may not be fair to say that it is his purpose to exert every effort within his supposedly limited powers to get us into war. But at least this statement is incontestable—EVERY ACT OF HIS IN THE PAST THREE YEARS IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH A PURPOSE, AND NO ACT IS INCONSISTENT THEREWITH."

This follows the report of the Financial Post of Toronto, Canada, published in its issue of Jan. 27, 1940, after exhaustive investigation, and reading as follows:

"The business, professional and financial leaders of the U. S. are DESPERATELY afraid of war that would CONCENTRATE DICTATORIAL POWER IN THE HANDS OF ROOSEVELT and his New Deal associates."

On Dec. 10, 1939, Roosevelt's Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy to Great Britain, made this statement, according to the 1940 World Almanac: "There is no reason, economic, financial or social, to justify the United States entering the war. This is NOT OUR FIGHT!"

"The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish Hegemony throughout the world."—Gen. George van Horn Moseley, retired. U. S. Army, in the N. Y. Herald Tribune of March 29, 1939.

In a 1939 book entitled "Propaganda In The Next War," Sidney Rogerson, British citizen, made the following starement: "OUR propaganda will aim at attaching the support of important sections, such as the Jews. Our propaganda during the great war (World War I), succeeded in embroiling the U. S. with Germany."

"American foreign policy is now more dangerous to world peace than any other factor," reported its European correspondent Feb. 25, 1939, to the Saturday Evening Post, warning that "more than Hitler," European peoples fear the communist minorities in the U.S.

The following is from Edmondson Bulletin of August 22, 1940:

"America is in danger. The destruction of the British Navy would be the turning of our Atlantic Maginot Line. I am certain that if Great Britain is defeated, the attack from Germany will come."—U. S. Jewish Ambassador Bullitt to France, Phila. 8-10-40.

In 1940 President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Premier MacKenzie King of Canada concluded "A Pact for the joint defense of the U. S. and Canada," and since the British Empire is at war and Canada is part of that Empire, then the Pact INVOLVES THIS COUNTRY IN THE EUROPEAN CONFLICT BY BRINGING THE LATTER TO THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE.

If the British fleet is going to consolidate with the American navy, HOW IS GERMANY GOING TO INVADE THE U. S. WITH NO NAVY? Against WHOM are these 42,000,000 FDR regimented Americans going to fight? asked Edmondson.

The Dilling 'Red Network' says: "The lewish Press exults over Bullitt's mother being Jewish." (The reason is probably found in this European statement: "According to Jewish Law (Schulchan Aruk, Ebenaezer IV) the woman is the bearer of heredity.")

In the Philadephia Inquirer of Sept. 23, 1940, Columnist Paul Mallon writes: "Not all defense money is going for defenses. The appropriations apparently are being stretched to cover just about every phase of government activity under the sun, not the least of which is the re-election of Roosevelt. National Defense is only the new neon sign of the New Deal. It becomes plain that the socializing era is to proceed more expansively under the new defense billions, and in step with progress toward war."

"American Jewry is engaged in two wars, one as part of a democratic government and the other as part of a race on which Germany has been waging war," said N. Y. Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver before a Texas audience, according to the Dallas Morning News, April 4, 1940.

A Canadian audience was told by Rabbi M. L. Perlzweig, of Britain: "The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years."—Toronto Evening Telegram of Feb. 26, 1940. Did F. D. R. accept the suggestive implication?

We are at the bottom of nearly all your wars. We did it solely with the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda. —Marcus Eli Ravage, Jewish author, in Century Magazine of January February, 1928.

F. D. R. Advisor Henry Morgenthau told a South Carolina audience Feb. 11, 1953, that the U. S. is heading for another general war.—Portland Journal of Feb. 12, 1933.

On The Way To Was

Senator D. Worth Clark of Idaho, on Feb. 24, 1941, warned the Senate: "You American people are on your way to war. You are moving there in a turbulent cataract of misinformation and heavily subsidized propaganda. Soon the Senate will make a declaration of war. It will not be called that. WE call it the Lend-Lease' Bill 1776." That bill was proposed by Roosevelt.

"We Jews are going to BRING A WAR ON THE NAZIS," predicted President David A. Brown, of the American Hebrew, New Deal Advisor, to Defendant Edmondson, on May 25, 1934, in the presence of John T. Mills, Jr., an investment specialist of New York City. Brown attacked Edmondson for criticizing F. D. R.

Was Brown's prediction of war on Germany connected with the following statement by Rabbi S. S. Wise of N. Y. City, quoted in the N. Y. American of May 18, 1933, namely: "I AM FOR WAR! We feel this is another of the great crises of Jewish Life." He was referring to the Hitler disfranchisement of Jews in Germany.

John Haynes Holmes, pastor of the Community Church of New York, accused "the Roosevelt Administration of conspiring to break down the people's resolve to peace." He said the myths used were that the nation was in danger of invasion; that Britain was fighting America's battle, and that this war, like the last, was for 'Democracy' ".—N. Y. Herald Tribune, March 10, 1941.

The Christian Century Pulpit, November, 1941, editorially said: "Steadily, and with consummate skill, the Washington Administration has pushed the nation to the brink of war."

"The American people are being betrayed into the arms of their enemies by modern Judases," declared Senator Wheeler of Montana before an American First meeting at Cincinnati, (N. Y. Herald-Tribune, April 4, 1941) denouncing Roosevelt foreign policies.

In the N. Y. Herald-Tribune of August 18, 1940, Republican Presidential Candidate Willkie, in his acceptance speech, declared: "The President's attacks on foreign powers have been dangerous. He has dabbled in inflammatory statements and manufactured panics. He has courted a war... which the country emphatically does not want."

Roosevelt sent fifty American destroyers Sept. 5, 1940, to Britain for use in its war, and later arranged for "air bases" in British possessions.

The N. Y. Times of June 21, 1940, announced that Roosevelt had put the defense-conscription regimentation of American youth in charge of the Socialist Sidney Hillman, foreign-born Jewish President of the Red Amalgamated Clothing Workers Union of N. Y. City—which act caused Democratic Congressman Cox of Georgia to ejaculate "God Save The Republic!"

The following is published in the N. Y. World-Telegram of Sept. 9, 1940, under the by-line of Journalist William Philip Simms, purporting to be THE PLAN to drag the United States into the war with Germany:

"Peace or war for the U. S., in the view of shrewd diplomatic observers, hangs on the outcome of the Battle of Britain. Should the Nazis succeed in invading England, the government, headed by what H. G. Wells calls our Anglo-American Prime Minister Winston Churchill," will most certainly shift its seat to Canada. Churchill has already said as much.

"The possibility of this shift is said to be one of the main reasons why London so readily swapped naval and air bases in the Western Atlantic for 50 of our destroyers. It was certainly behind the British pledge not to surrender or scuttle their fleet in the event of defeat.

"The inevitable result of this, in the opinion of competent diplomatists, WOULD BE TO BRING THE EUROPEAN WAR TO THIS COUNTRY; for the U. S. is not only bound by the 117-year old Monroe Doctrine to guard this hemisphere from foreign aggression, but now that it shares Atlantic naval and air bases with Britain, those bases will have to be defended.

"That all classes of British people now share this view is no secret. Some are too diplomatic to say so for publication, but others are less discreet."

In 1941-2, Charles Michaelson, Jewish Director of Publicity for the Democratic National Committee, reportedly gave a complete picture of the New Deal Plan to enter the war, in circulars printed and issued from Washington during 1941-2.

Observe the following significant quotinion from the Chicago Jewish Sentinel of Oct. 8, 1942: "THE SECOND WORLD WAR IS BEING FOUGHT FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF JUDAISM." Not for Christian Americanism! For JEWISH survival!

"... We did not go to war because we were attacked at Pearl Harbor... We were attacked at Pearl Harbor because WE HAD GONE TO WAR WHEN WE MADE THE LEND-LEASE DECLARATION. That declaration was an affirmative act on our part AND A WARLINE ACT."—N. Y. Times Publisher Arthur Hays Sulzburger (Jew), in Washington Times-Herald, Feb. 1, 1944.

If the foregoing "overt" record does not show Roosevelt warmongering at Jewish instigation, what does it imply?

ROOSEVELT JEWISH ANCESTRY RECORD

Seditious conspiracy case "Prosecutor John Rogge disclosed that Robert Edward Edmondson, defendant, will be prosecuted for distributing documents describing President Roosevelt as a Jew, carrying the implication that he got the country into war to help fellow-Jews." From the Washington Times-Herald, March 30, 1943.

Whereupon Defendant Edmondson prepared the below documented "overtevidence" as a court "exhibit."

The following is from "The Revealer," (10-15-36), Editor G. B. Winrod, of Wichita, Kansas, which published a Roosevelt family genealogical chart prepared by the Carnegic Institute of Washington, D. C., as reported by the Daily Citizen of Tucson, Arizona, The Times of St. Petersburg, Florida, and the Star of Washington, D. C. It was reproduced in an Oct. 20, 1936, Edmondson Bulletin Reprint—

(GENEALOGICAL CHART PREPARED IN THE CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON, D. C., UNDER DIRECTION OF OR, H. H. LAUGHLIN, PER ASSO. PRESS DISPATCH MAR. 7, 1934, IN THE DAILY CITIZEN OF TUCSON, ARIZ. A SIMILAR CHART WAS PUBLISHED BY THE WASHINGTON, D. C., STAR, OF FEB. 29, 1936)

The chart has come as a shocking revelation to millions of American Citizens. It convinces as to the President's Jewish ancestry.

From the viewpoint of eugenics, it explains his natural bent toward radicalism. It shows why he has given hundreds of so-called Liberals, Socialists and Communists powerful positions in the national Government. It proves unmistakably that the Roosevelt Administration offers a biological as well as a political problem.

The New York Times of March 14, 1935, quotes the President as saying: "In the distant past my ancestors may have been Jews. All I know about the origin of the Roosevelt family is that they are apparently descended from Claes Martenszen van Roosevelt, who came from Holland."

Additional information regarding the nationality of the Roosevelt family, was given by Chase S. Osborn, early in 1934, at St. Petersburg, Florida. Mr. Osborn was formerly Governor of Michigan. The leading newspaper of the city (The Times) carried the following report after the interview:

"Although a Republican, the former Governor has a sincere regard for President Roosevelt and his policies. He referred to the Jewish ancestry' of the President, explaining how he is a descendant of the Rossocampo family expelled from Spain in 1620. Seeking safety in Germany. Holland and other countries, members of the family, he said, changed their name to Roseberg, Rosenbaum, Rosenblum, Rosenvelt and Rosenthal.

"The Rosenvelts in north Holland finally became Roosevelt, soon becoming apostates with the first generation and others following suit until, in the fourth generation, a little storekeeper by the name of Jacobus Roosevelt was the only one who remained true to HIS JEWISH FAITH. It is because of this Jewish ancestry, former Governor Osborn said, that President Roosevelt has the trend

of economic safety (?) in his veins.'

The radical movement which is sweeping the world today, causing the foundations of organized society to crumble, is a Jewish movement! Whether it is the First Communist Manifesto, written by the Jew Karl Marx, in 1848—or a Moscow dictatorship, set up eighteen years ago; composed of 545 leaders, of whom 447 were Jews—or a Jewish banking concern in Wall Street depositing money to the credit of Lenin and Trotsky in a sister bank in Sweden—or a Communist regime in France, headed by the Jew, Leon Blum—or a Spanish revolution, precipitated by a Jew named Bela Kun, or a subversive Brain Trust carrying the nation toward the red abyss of Bolshevism . . . the radical program is today, and always has been, primarily A JEWISH PROGRAM.

Roosevelt inevitably draws upon his Semitic ancestry. It is, therefore, as natural for him to be a radical, as it is for others to be true Americans. This is why he can boast of flouting conventionalities, and publicly gloat over destroying those traditions which are fundamental to our national character. HE IS NOT ONE OF US! This may also explain why he has no hestitation in break-

ing his promises (Kol Nidre Oath-Prayer Repudiation?)

It is to be doubted if he, himself, understands the inner forces that surge through his being, driving him further and further toward the Left! It's in his blood! Meanwhile, the result of 160 years' constructive effort on the part of

Christian natriots threatens to be swept away.

For this reason, one of his official acts after becoming President, was to invite Finkelstein, alias Litvinoff, to the White House for the purpose of establishing diplomatic relations with the Jewish dictatorship of Moscow. For this reason, he has appointed Jewish Ambassadors to such strategic diplomatic posts as Paris, Stockholm and Moscow. For this reason, Bernard Baruch has been called "the unofficial President of the United States."

For this reason, a super-cabinet, known as the "Brain Trust," an organization of appointees dominated by powerful Jewish intellects, has been set up to

usurp constitutional powers of our duly elected lawmakers.

We do not condemn Roosevelt for coming from Jewish stock. We condemn him for being a leader in the international radical movement which is throwing Gentile governments into convulsions.

If the Jews were living as an independent nation in their homeland (Palestine) today, it would be a mistake for a Gentile to rule over them.

In like manner, the Semitic mind is incapable of assimilating the Christian and American viewpoints sufficiently to risk placing the destiny of 120,000,000 human beings in the hands of a few members of their race.

(End of reprint).

Ancestry In Politics

Liberation Magazine of Nov. 14, 1940, reprints the following October editorial from the Macon, Ga., Telegraph:

"A few days ago we commended editorially Edward J. Flynn, Chairman of the National Democratic Committee, for his repudiation and denunciation of the pamphlet unknown persons had circulated about Wendel Willkie's German ancestry. In the matter of racial lines Mr. Roosevelt might come into the picture

on the basis of his ancestry

"Ex Gov. Chase S. Osborn of Michigan—and Poulan, Ga.,—was quoted as having said that he inquired of President Roosevelt as to his nationality, and that Mr. Roosevelt wrote in reply that his earliest ancestor of record was a Spanish Jew, who left that country under one of the inquisitions, and went to Holland as Rosefeld or a similar name; that the offspring eventually developed the name into Rosenfeldt and then Roosevelt.

"Having seen something like the above in print, and it having been credited to Gov. Osborn and Mr. Roosevelt, I wrote to Gov. Osborn and asked him what he had learned conclusively as to Mr. Roosevelt's ancestry. Gov. Osborn wrote that President Roosevelt is 'a half Jew; his wife is A FULL

IEWESS."

In the 1938 "World Almanac" under the heading "Biographies of U. S. Presidents and Their Wives," page 237, appears this: "Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the son of James Roosevelt, a direct descendant of Claes Martenzen van ROSENVELT, who arrived in New Amsterdam in 1649 and married Jannetje SAMUELS."

The following is from "The House of Roosevelt" by Paul Haber, 1936 edition, "Claes Rosenvelt entered the clothing business in New York, and was married in 1682. He accumulated a fortune. He then changed his name to Nicholas Rosenvelt. Of his four sons, Isaac died young. Nicholas married Sarah Solomons.

New York Jews having designed and struck off a medal with the head of Roosevelt on one side and the sixpoint Solomon Star, synagogue symbol of possession and world power, on the other, with a mystical so-called "Good Luck" idiom in the center of the star, Edmondson and his associates investigated to ascertain the significance, if any, and report these implications:

"Good Luck and Wisdom to Franklin D. Roosevelt, our Modern Moses, Leading Jewry in 'The Promised Land' (America) under the 'Seal of Solomon,'

Writing in the "Hakenkreuzbanner" of May 14, 1939, Prof. Dr. Johann von Leers of Berlin-Dahlem, Germany, publishes an exhaustive analysis of Roosevelt's ancestry. A new discovery is quoted to show that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's mother—Sarah Delano—is from a Jewish blood family.

Comments Dr. von Leers: "Schmalix (genealogist) writes: 'In the seventh generation we see the mother of Franklin Delano Roosevelt as being of Jewish descent. The Delanos are descendants of an Italian or Spanish Jewish family—

Dilano, Dilan, Dillano."

"According to Jewish Law (Schulchan Aruk, Ebenaezer IV) the woman is the bearer of the heredity. That means: children of a full-blooded Jewess and a Christian are, according to Jewish Law, JEWS.

"We can understand why Jewish associations call him the 'New Moses;' why he gets Jewish medals—highest orders of the Jewish people. For every Jew who is acquainted with the law, he is evidently one of them."

With this Jewish Delano descent added to the other records herein and New York Jews on the East Side constantly referring to the President proudly as "Rosenvelt," it would seem that Dr. von Leers is justified in exclaiming:

"It being true that the Delanos are well-known Jews President Roosevelt is, from the standpoint of Jewish Heredity Law, AS GOOD A JEW AS BERNARD M. BARUCH."

The Washington Star of Feb. 29, 1936 (Seen in Library of Congress) published a Roosevelt Family Tree, showing his descent from the Holland

Rosenvelts.

In an elaborate book entitled 'Young America's Story of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Man of Action," 1933 edition, by Jewish Authors Lowitz & Sadybeth (N. Y. Public Library), published by Doubleday, Doran & Co., N. Y. City, ROOSEVELT'S JEWISH ANCESTRY is indicated. On Page 3 the statement is made: "In 1644 Claes Martensohn van Rosenvelt with his wife Janette, stowed their belongings in a westbound ship, and bid farewell to the little village in Zeeland, Holland. Rosevelt means field of roses."

F.D.R. Reared by Baruch

"When FDR was introducing Mme. Chiang Kai-sheck to some of his friends he said: 'This is Bernard M. Baruch, Bernie's raised me for about thirty years.' Baruch countered: 'And don't you think I've done a pretty good job of it?' "—From the Drew Pearson column of the Washington Post of March 26, 1943, Jewish Publisher Eugene Meyer, Jr.

The Jewish Sentinel of Chicago, of Sept. 15, 1938, reported "Young Judea has inscribed in the 'HEBREW Children's Golden Book' the name of President Roosevelt's grandchild FDR 3rd, President Roosevelt's NAME has already been

inscribed in the Golden Book.'

"All I know about the origin of the Roosevelt family in this country is that all branches bearing that name were apparently descended from Claes Martenssen van Roosevelt who came from Holland. In the distant past they may have been Jews."—Letter from President Franklin D. Roosevelt printed in the Detroit Jewish Chronicle, as reported in the N. Y. Times of March 15, 1935.

"Many of the New Deal principles of government and economics were established thousands of years ago in Mosaic and Talmudic Law," Jewish Mayor LaGuardia told 150 delegates at the National Convention of B'nai B'rith in

N. Y. City.—N. Y. American of June 8, 1937.

"An appeal that Jews co-operate with President Roosevelt because his ideals are identical with those of the ancient Hebrew prophets, was made by Rabbi S. H. Goldenson in his sermon yesterday," said the Jewish Daily Bullerin of March 12, 1934.

"A Kinship is to be found between the aims which he (President Roosevelt) exemplifies and the purpose for which the Binai Birith carries on,"—quotation from Jewish Governor Horner-Levy of Illinois, published in the monthly magazine of Binai Birith April, 1934, largest International Order

of Tews in the world.

"Roosevelt's Supreme Council," or "Brain Trust," as it was called, included U. S. Supreme Court Jewish Justice Louis D. Brandeis, "Father of the New Deal," contributor to the Communistic Commonwealth College of Mena, Ark.; Bernard M. Baruch, "Unofficial President," self-confessed Wall St., speculator and International Financier; U. S. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, "Legal Master-Mind of the New Deal," Harvard's so-called "Karl Marx Professor;" Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury; Judge Samuel I. Rosenman, "Roosevelt's Right Arm," Founder and Head of the Brain Trust and writer of Roosevelt's State Papers; Gov. H. H. Lehman of New York; Sidney Hillman, Labor Advisor; James P. Warburg, son of Paul M. Warburg, "Father of the Federal Reserve System." (From Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of October 20, 1933).

The following New York item was published under an Associated Press date line of May 8, 1937; "President Roosevelt will receive the tenth award of the Gottheil Medal for "DISTINGUISHED SERVICES TO JEWRY."

American Newspaper Sydicate Writer Paul Mallon wrote Feb. 7, 1937: "The man behind the repacking process (of the U. S. Supreme Court) was Samuel I. Rosenman, N. Y. State Justice, little known but close friend of the President."

"The underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy of Justice Dembitz Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court; the NRA is almost a composite of his dissenting opinions." (From Jewish-owned N. Y. Times of June 28, 1934.)

Gen. Hugh S. Johnson in the Chicago Tribune of June 28, 1934: "During this whole intense experience (formation of the NRA, later held unconstitutional), I have been in constant touch with Judge Brandeis."

"More than any other one person, Felix Frankfurter is the legal master mind of the New Deal," say Simon & Schuster, Jewish publishers of their 1934 edition of the Roosevelt 'New Dealers,' "Frankfurter men are established in key posts throughout the Administration."

"Karl Marx" Prof. Frankfurter was referred to thus by Gen. Hugh Johnson in the Saturday Evening Post of Oct. 26, 1935: "He has more influence than any other single individual in the U. S."

The N. Y. Herald-Tribune reported: Max Bedacht of N. Y. City, representing the Communist Party, at the Ways & Means Committee hearing April 2, 1936, strongly approved the Roosevelt Administration plan to tax undivided surpluses, saying "this type of levy has been contained in the platform of the Communist Party for many years."

"The Bolshevist Revolution was LARGELY the outcome of Jewish thought and discontent; what Jewish idealism so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind ARE TENDING TO PROMOTE IN OTHER COUNTRIES." The foregoing appeared in the American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920, and the following is from the London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919: "The Ideals of Bolshevism are at many points CONSONANT with the finest Ideals of Judaism."

Roosevelt was awarded the American Hebrew Medal for "Distinguished Services to Jewry."—Washington Times-Herald March 6, 1946.

Judge Julian W. Mack, N. Y. City Jewish "legal light," in a 1933 book by Jewish Author Jessie Sampter, entitled "Modern Palestine" told a Zionist Conference: "Beyond question, NINE-TENTHS of the Jews of America are Zionists."

"In Democracy alone is the hope of the Jew,"—President Alfred M. Cohen of the International B'nai B'rith, in the N. Y. Herald-Tribune of May 9, 1938. And then President Roosevelt vociferated later: "We are not only the largest and most powerful DEMOCRACY, but other democracies look to us for leader-ship." (N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938).

New York Rabbi David de Sola Pool, friend of Roosevelt, made the following harmonious comment in the N. Y. Times of Oct. 22, 1939: "The United States has been built up into a GREAT RESERVOIR OF DEMOCRACY."

Rabbi Israel M. Goldman wrote in the American Hebrew Weekly of Nov. 3, 1939: "We as Jews are certain that Judaism (which is 'religion') and

Democracy (which is 'politics') are INSEPARABLE." In the N. Y. Times of Dec. 24, 1939, shortly thereafter, we read this from Roosevelt's "peace letter to the Pope:"—"It is well that we encourage a closer association between those in religion and those in government." American fundamentals require separation of Church and State.

Roosevelt warned Congress in a 1942 Message "We must be particularly vigilant against racial discrimination," referring to Hitler persecution of Jews. (Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle of Jan. 16, 1942).

"Non-Jewish officials in the Government, acting under direction of the President, are trying to get various agencies to employ more Jews"—Readers Digest for September, 1942, article by Klipinger.

End of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's ancestral record, carrying conviction into all except closed minds, that he was Jewish.

"OVERT ACTS" OF ROOSEVELT CONSPIRACY AGAINST EDMONDSON ET AL

"I wish to disclaim, on behalf of the Government, any intention of prosecuting defendants because they criticized the President and the New Deal. They may criticize the President and the New Deal to their heart's content. We desire ONLY to prosecute for statements which interfered with the WAR EFFORT."

The foregoing statement was made by Department of Justice Prosecutor Ewing in N. Y. Times, July 29, 1942.

Compare that with this: "Mass-Case Prosecutor Rogge disclosed today that Defendant Edmondson will be prosecuted for distributing documents describing President Roosevelt as a Jew."—Washington Times-Herald, March 30, 1943. No U.S. law makes it a crime to call anybody a Jew. Edmondson exercised his free speech right to "criticize the President to his heart's content."

Robert Edward Edmondson was charged by the seditious conspiracy prosecution with interfering with the war effort and giving aid and comfort to enemies of the U. S. (Per 1944 indictment.)

He stopped publication and retired from all publicity activity Nov. 30, 1940, more than a year before the U. S. entered war against the Axis Powers. Before indictment he was known to the prosecution as having done so because in February, 1943, in the presence of witnesses, Asst. Prosecutor Burns said to him: "We were sorry to learn that you had stopped publication Nov. 30, 1940, because we hate to lose a defendant."

In further specific support of the charge that the Roosevelt New Deal Administration criminally conspired to take away defendant Edmondson's constitutional rights, note that in February, 1943, the Department of Justice voluntarily returned to this defendant over 90% of papers seized in his home without a search warrant, (as required by the U. S. Constitution), among which were 117 bulletin publications each bearing the 1942 signature endorsement of the seizing officer, which documents contained 1297 PRO-American-IN-TENT expressions, and many ANTI-Nazi statements.

"The Pathfinder," printed in Washington, carried in its July 24, 1944, issue, the following statement from Arthur Garfield Hays, Chief Counsel of the American Civil Liberties Union, being an extract from his denunciation therein of the mass-trial procedure:

"I am particularly opposed to a situation where, in time of war men are tried because of statements made in time of peace. Those utterances may have meant quite different things in the setting of peace. Whatever the court may charge, it is impossible for a jury at the present time to fit those words into the background in which they were said."

In Cramer vs. U. S., the U. S., Supreme Court ruled April 23, 1945: "Evidence relates statements by Cramer before the U. S. was at war with Germany. At the time they were uttered, however, they were not treasonable. To use pre-war expressions of opposition to entering a war to convict of treason during the war, is a dangerous procedure."

In the document issued by President Roosevelt Sept. 9, 1939, "Proclaiming the Neutrality of the United States in the War between Germany and England, France, Poland, etc." was the following:

"The treaties of the U. S. require that no person within the jurisdiction of the U. S. shall take part in said war but shall remain at peace with all of said belligerents;" warning that any citizen who may "misconduct" himself does so "at his peril."

Congress did not declare war on Germany until Dec. 11, 1941, after declaring war on Japan on Dec. 8, 1941, and the President did not theretofore "proclaim" that the U. S. was "at war," although he asked for "war power" as below, but did not receive such authority.

The N. Y. World-Telegram of Jan. 3, 1940, quoted Secretary of the Navy Edison as asking Congress "to vest in the President during the national emergency those powers which he has in time of war;" showing that the Nation was then "in time of peace;" not yet making any "war effort," and was definitely still in a "national emergency" status, and "at peace."

The line of free press demarcation between peace time and war time is clearly drawn in the Dec. 21, 1941, issue of the N. Y. Times, by the following statement of Washington Correspondent Arthur Krock:

"Freedom of the press in the U. S., guaranteed in time of peace by the first article of the Bill of Rights but clearly incompatible with national security in time of war, officially ended Dec. 18, 1941, when the President signed the revived War Powers Act of 1917."

That the Roosevelt New Deal Administration promoted a plot against defendants in the seditious conspiracy case to cover up its own treason is indicated by the following evidence, which it actually had in its possession prior to indictments.

The 1942 United States State Dept. book entitled "National Socialism" admitted that "it was impossible to adduce any direct statements" in Nazi literature or speeches indicating that domination of the world was a Nazi aim—yet in the indictment against defendants it charged they had joined such a world wide conspiracy.

'The high-grade British magazine "19th Century & After" of September, 1943, reproduced in the Congressional Record, stated that the Nazi aim was not world domination, but that Germany wanted to be a world power like Britain.

The 1945 report of U. S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Marshall said no evidence had been found of any "over-all strategy" by the German High Command, without which there could have been no worldwide Nazi conspiracy, as alleged in the indictment.

Defendant Edmondson is a stenographer. On Sept. 19, 1944, he reported the following testimony in the seditious conspiracy trial as given by Prosecution Witness Teller, on Ambassador Dodd's staff: "You were in Germany during the time Ambassador Dodd was there?"
"Yes, From 1924 to 1941."

"While in Germany did you ever hear of a 'publicly announced program by Nazi leaders to overthrow the United States Government and put National Socialism in its place?" (Prosecution allegation)

'No."

Prosecution Witnesses Gissibl and Luedtke likewise testified that they had never heard of such a conspiracy program.

Under the heading "Sedition Case Framed by Pseudo G-Men," the Washington Times-Herald of Feb. 26, 1944, published the following:

"The powerful U. S. Department of Justice . . . under New Deal compulsion—allowed a particularly vicious amateur, Eugene Meyers, Jr. (Jew), Publisher of the Washington Post, to FRAME-UP a case against a group of alleged Nazi agents, whom the Post accused of seditious activities imperiling the morale of soldiers and sailors . . .

"In framing Federal indictments against defendants one of Meyers' reporters acted as agent provocateur to try to entrap obscure pamphleteers and anti-semites into an 'overt act' in the District of Columbia, so that they could be tried here in this Government dominated community.

"In this capacity Meyers' Reporter Dillard Stokes posed as fictitious Jefferson Breem, 3917 Penna. Ave., S. E.; and also as Adam Quigley, P. O. Box 219, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D. C.

"The Post reporter, breathing a plausible degree of anti-Semitism, wrote to numerous agitators seeking samples of their outgivings. Five took the bait—and found themselves indicted for the 'overt' act of causing to be delivered to the Washington Post Office copies of their propaganda. Working closely with the Meyer sleuths was Justice Department Assistant Attorney General Maloney."

The foregoing is confirmed on Page 29 of "The Sedition Case" (1953) in Congressional documentation.

Below is another piece of "overt evidence" indicating that the Roosevelt Administration conspired to victimize Defendant Edmondson.

The indictment of Jan. 3, 1944, was challenged at trial by Defense Counsel Lindas, as reported in the shorthand testimony of proceedings on Page 9315. He pointed out that the law on which the seditious conspiracy charges are based was passed June 28, 1940. "If a statement by an alleged co-conspirator is to be used against anybody it must be after the conspiracy has been formed.

"How can a conspiracy be formed to violate a law UNTIL THERE IS A LAW? Therefore, anything that he or any one else says is only hearsay as far as my client is concerned because there are no CO-CONSPIRATORS UNTIL THERE IS A LAW TO VIOLATE.

"In other words, if Mr. Jones says something that might show an intention on his part to violate something, as far as my client is concerned it is only hearsay UNTIL THE LAW GOES INTO EXISTENCE. Until there is a conspiracy the act of one cannot bind the others.

"Before June 28, 1940, no matter what these people said, or even if they had an organization and talked together it would not make it a conspiracy to violate that law because THERE WAS NO LAW. That is the reason I am objecting to the introduction of these documents in evidence.

"We have had 16 weeks of nothing but what somebody has said about Jews—nothing about appealing to the troops to be disloyal."

Motion was denied.

The following was printed in the N. Y. News Aug. 14, 1947, reporting the dropping of the mass-case:

"The mass sedition trial, ordered by the late President Roosevelt, was part of 'the smear terror' so well analyzed by John T. Flynn, and it had a single objective—To drive to cover all criticism of the Roosevelt intent to involve The Republic in Europe's wars. . . . The heart of White House strategy of terror was: We don't dare to indict and put on trial the big fellows who oppose us . . . but if we indict some small fry . . . then we can perhaps scare the big fellows into silence. . . .

"Incidentally, this burlesque on American justice, fairplay and the Federal courts, has cost the U. S. Treasury between \$1,000,000 and \$1,500,000.

"The surviving defendants now go free, CLEARED BY THE DEPART-MENT OF JUSTICE OF EVER BEING GUILTY OF ANY CRIME."

"A few years ago there was a charge of criminal libel against Robert Edward Edmondson (unconditionally dismissed May 10, 1938) based upon Anti-Semitic phamphlets which he was circulating. Emotionally, the prosecution PLEASED US (Jews). We failed to realize that it might be a mistake to make a martyr of him. On further consideration, Jewish groups felt that a trial of the case would have a pernicious effect. In support of a motion to dismiss the indictment, briefs were filed by the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the American Civil Liberties Union, whose briefs argued that the protection of a free press and of religious liberty were more important than conviction of the defendant. So the trial was stopped.

"But when Edmondson was again indicted (1942-4) in the seditious conspiracy case, JEWISH EMOTIONS TRIUMPHED AGAIN." (From an article written by Arthur Garfield Hays in the Jewish Post." (Hays was Chief counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.)

Does it "carry implications" that "Roosevelt and his Jews" were conspiratorially responsible for the two prosecutions? New Deal Jewish Mayor LaGuardia of New York, by letter of June 8, 1936, started the N. Y. prosecution of Defendant Edmondson.

The Washington Times Herald of Nov. 23, 1946, commenting on the dismissal of the mass-indictments, printed:

"The case was bred in malice, prosecuted in hate, and pursued in bigotry."

The Chicago Tribune of Nov. 25, 1946, editorially declared that the case "was conceived dishonestly and conducted dishonestly. . . . The case was so flimsy that Government counsel delayed it as long as they could, continuing harassment of defendants."

The evidence of a Roosevelt frame-up to jail defendant Edmondson is doubly-damning in consideration of the U. S. Supreme Court's dictum regarding the duty of Government prosecutors, quoted below:

"The United States Attorney is the representative, not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution, is not that it shall win a case but that justice shall be done... And it is his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction, as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." (Berger v. U. S., 295 U. S. 78, 84, 79 L. ed. 1314, 55 S. Ct. 629.)

A Chicago Tribune editorial commented on Aug. 2, 1947, in more than a column of denunciation:

"Five years and ten days after its inception, the infamous Washington mass-sedition case died. It was launched by the Roosevelt Regime in an attempt to silence all political dissent, and particularly all reference to the criminality of those in high office who steered the American people into an unwanted war.

"Entrapment was employed to establish a showing that defendants were moving toward their purported goal with interlocking action."

"The Messenger," Los Angeles organ of B'nai B'rith, in its Dec. 15, 1944 issue, published:

"The uncooperative press was largely responsible for the non-success of the mass-sedition trial. SINCE THE ENTIRE REASON FOR THE TRIAL was to educate the public into the ways of Nazism to link Anti-Semitism and other racisms with the Hitlerian movement, this lack of cooperation was A FUNDAMENTAL SETBACK. The Justice Department has provided a larger audience for the vicious mouthings of 'THE LUNATIC FRINGE'."

Does all this show that "Roosevelt and his Jews"—to employ a Dorothy Thompson label — were behind a criminal conspiracy to deprive defendant Fdmondson of substantial Constitutional rights?

Below is an eye-witness account of the court proceedings following a Roosevelt radio national broadcast early in October prior to introduction of "evidence" against mass-case Defendant Pelley.

"President Roosevelt put the mass case directly into politics in a big way by his national broadcast linking the Pelley Silver Shirts with the Brown Shirts and Black Shirts of Europe. There is no doubt that failure to convict defendants has got 'under his hide.'

"Pelley's Defense Lawyer William J. Powers rose and attacked the President for 'trying to influence the jury against all defendants by his national broadcast.' The court ordered him to proceed along 'different lines.' Whereupon Mr. Powers angrily asked 'Is the President of the United States the only one who has a right to free speech to smear these helpless defendants over the air and in the newspapers? If so, then the people of this country should know it.' Prosecutor Rogge objected, was sustained and Mr. Powers sat down.

"Defense Counsel Frey, who had often denounced the proceedings as 'New Deal political persecution,' rose and demanded discontinuance of trial until after election.

"Defense Attorney John Jackson, Jr., rose and declared heatedly that the President's denunciation was an attack on every defendant in the case, the first of any such attack by any President. He quoted U. S. Supreme Court decisions dismissing cases that had achieved political notoriety.

"The Court then banned all oral argument, and reserved decision. (Later: Motions denied)"

Court-Appointed Defense Counsel Frank H. Myers (later elevated to the Washington bench) filed May 1, 1946, a motion vigorously opposing additional delay requested by the prosecution for further search to try to get new evidence in Germany against defendants, in which he said: "To prolong this trial... would be a travesty on our democratic processes and only serve to bring our court in this jurisdiction into disrepute arising from this un-American and unconstitutional method of trial."

Mr. Myers had previously spoken two and one-half hours declaring that, after listening to "evidence" of the prosecution for many weeks, he had come to the conclusion that "not any of the defendants are guilty as charged in the indictment."

The history of American criminal procedure fails to reveal one instance where, as in this persecution, men were held in jail for years to give the prose-

cutors an opportunity to build up a doubtful case.

The theory behind the trial was that if this conglomeration of unrelated persons, many of whom did not even know each other, could be convicted, a precedent would be established that the law could be used in this country as an instrument of political force and coercion. . . The prosecution ended because the Government had NO CASE." (Baltimore News-Post of Aug. 18, 1947.)

Do Department of Justice Policies imperatively demand investigation? Note that W. J. Powers, of the Chicago Bar, wrote as follows to the Chicago

Tribune in December, 1946:

"If any organization has maintained a set program of contempt for civil liberties in this country, it is the Department of Justice."

After citing a number of flagrant cases in detail Mr. Powers dwelt on

outstanding outrages in the so-called mass-sedition trial, saying:

"In an attempt to discover what it was all about, the writings of various defendants were pooled and studied by defense counsel. Some defendants had opposed entry into World War II—others had not; some were German-American Bund members—others were not; some were anti-Jewish—others were not. . . . The only common denominator for ALL defendants was that they were more or less violently anti-communistic—YET THEY WERE ALL PROSE-CUTED FOR 'SEDITION.' "

And defendants were not even indicted under the 1917 "War Espionage Act" applicable to "sedition," but under the peace-time law of June 28, 1940, which does not apply to "sedition" but to "seditious conspiracy"—a British "seditious libel" judiciary title not in American Criminal Law, under which large "group libel" in the public interest is not actionable.

PRINCIPAL AGENCIES DEMANDING RETRIAL

Careful investigation indicates that the principal agencies publicly pressing for retrial of what they miscall "the sedition case," included the following Roosevelt champions:

WALTER WINCHELL, listed in Who's Who in American Jewry as a radio-broad-

caster and columnist of N. Y. City.

ADOLPH J. SABATH, listed in Who's Who in American Jewry as Congressman

from Illinois, born in Czechoslovakia.

B'NAI B'RITH, International Jewish Secret Order, Henry Monsky, President, Chicago.

JEWISH SENTINEL of Chicago, J. I. Fishbein, Editor.

CALIFORNIA JEWISH VOICE of Los Angeles.

JEWISH NATIONAL DAY of N. Y. City, Rabbi Schmelka Margoshes, Editor, born Galicia, Europe.

JEWISH EXAMINER of Brooklyn, N. Y., Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor.

"COUNTER ATTACK," organ of "National Committee to Combat Anti-Semitism,"

L. E. Golditch, Executive Secretary, N. Y. Cirv.

'IN FACT," Editor George Seldes, listed in Who's Who in American Jewry as

author, N. Y. City.

"DAILY WORKER" (U. S. Communist Party organ), Alan Max, Editor; Incorporators: Alex Trachtenburg, Ray Seigartel, Isaac Schorr, Irving Franklin, N. Y. City.

"CIO, Organizers: Sidney Hillman, born Lithuania; David Dubinsky, born Poland; Max Zaritsky, born Russia, heads of the three most prominent N. Y. City so called Red clothing union monopolies. CIO was backed by the Communist aiding Political Action Committee with its 400 Jewish names among Communists as listed by the Congressional Committee Report of March, 1944, in an investigation of the "CIO-PAC" political activities.

"NEW MASSES." Communistic periodical, N. Y. City.

Director J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, in his 1952 report, is quoted as saying: "We could not make a worse mistake than to think there is less Communist activity now than there was when it was flaunted in our faces. . . . The party itself had to go underground. . . . It continues to be one of the major threats to internal security."

Radio Broadcaster Fulton Lewis Jr. said in his syndicated column (2-11-52), that Congressman Dies in his anti-communist exposures, quoted the late President Roosevelt as stating: "There is nothing wrong with the Communists. Some of the best friends I have are Communists."

ROOSEVELT REVENGE MOTIVES

Can there now be any doubt that President Roosevelt had Robert Edward Edmondson, whom he knew had retired from all publicity a year before Pearl Harbor, put in the 1942-7 Washington mass-case under the impulsion of revenge motives, both personal and political? The following speaks for itself.

• (1) After giving high praise to President Roosevelt following his inauguration in the early part of 1933, but becoming patriotically alarmed by New Deal un-Americanism, Edmondson published Dec. 27, 1933, an open letter to the President asking him if the New Deal was trying to change the Republic-form of the U. S. Government into a communistic democracy. This letter was "answered" June 11, 1936, by a N. Y. City indictment charging Edmondson with "libel of all persons of the Jewish religion" by a Jewish-majority grand jury, under the Roosevelt lieutentancy of Jewish Mayor LaGuardia.
• (2) Edmondson broadcast under date of Oct. 20, 1936, a bulletin reproducing a previously published genealogical descent indicating that Roosevelt was of Jewish ancestry—supporting the chart with a long series of confirming documentation, not only genealogically but by association with Jews and his appointment of Jews to many positions in the national administration.
• (3) Forcing by damning exposures a court backdown May 10, 1938, of the N. Y. City libel charge, doubtless intensified the President's wrath.
• (4) Edmondson's continued publicity exposures of the Communistic nature of the New Deal and its politico-economic many subversions of traditional Americanism, intensified motivation.
• (5) Emphasizing Roosevelt's dishonorable repudiation of the dollar, government bond gold pledge, and other monetary subversions through an international banking cabal, which were creating "inextinguishable debt," raising the national debt to more than 200 billion dollars, added fuel to wrath.
• (6) Publicly uncovering Roosevelt's persistent warmongering promises and actions indicating secret maneuvering toward war involvement, must have made him jittery.
• (7) Anger at the manner in which Edmondson and defense attorneys were obtaining from prosecution witnesses themselves a cumulative volume of evidence further unmasking New Deal subversions, increased hatred.

The manifest prostitution of the Judicial and Executive Departments as plainly exposed in these Petition records, imposes upon the Senate Judiciary and House Un-American Activities Committees of The Congress the imperative high duty to exhaustively investigate and publicly unmask to fitting punishment identifiable sinister forces which have blackened the Honor of the Government of the United States by secretly "pressuring" its administrators to grossly oppress and shamelessly persecute loyal citizens for uncovering treason to The Republic in time of peril to the Nation.

TRIAL ATMOSPHERE HIGH-LIGHTS

In the 1944 Roosevelt New Deal Communistic Mass Persecution of Patriots

at Washington, D. C.

(From a Daily Diary)

By Marian L. Edmondson, Defendant's Wife, Deceased 1952

PREFATORY. These reports began June 25, 1944, with daily diary notes by Marian L. Edmondson, following approval of the jury which heard the case. The first jury was invalidated by prosecution technical error. Many defendants believed it "packed." The Communist Daily Worker Washington correspondent said when the first panel was rejected: "That looks bad." Court-appointed attorneys told defendants they had been informed that all defendants were guilty, and their services wouldn't be required sixty days. The mistrial lasted over seven months. Within a short time defense counsel began to discover the innocence of defendants, and progressively became their champions to a degree and extent beyond parallel. With not only individual liberties at stake, but the very life of The Republic hanging in suspense, personal and patriotic emotions were stirred to the depths, and they are responsible for this unique and revelatory account of FDR's court "Travesty on Justice."

ACTUAL HAPPENINGS

"Today the judge ruled that he would permit the prosecution to expand and develop its 'background' theory. That was done, going back over 20 years. But the 'evidence' thus far entered seems absurd to many of us. Yet no one can tell what the jury will make of it.

"Contrary to proper legal procedure, four defendants were absent as the prosecution's 'case' was presented against them. Illness and deaths prevented attendance. My husband commented: 'This will probably be known later as a mass-murder case.' One of the marshals of the court said to me: 'I don't like 'em any better than you do,' referring to Jews.

"A defense attorney remarked: 'It now begins to look as though the prosecution is determined to prolong this case indefinitely to punish the unpaid lawyers who have dared to challenge unfair and illegal tactics. Were we supposed to 'go along' and let honest defense of clients go to hell? We just couldn't do that and live with ourselves afterward.'

"Every piece of 'evidence' submitted by the prosecution has now been entered 'provisionally' or 'for the present'—apparently because of forceful objections and arguments presented by defense counsel and 'over-ruled.' Prosecution witnesses have been reduced to explanations and excuses such as 'that is the way I understand it.'

"On Tuesday we all thought the judge was going to have some kind of a seizure, and I was frightened. For apparently no reason, as defense arguments were proceeding, the judge began to bang his gavel. His face, neck and scalp (he is bald) were suffused with blood—and we held our breath!

"Later, while defense attorneys were cross-examining a witness, the judge intoned lifelessly: 'Objection over-ruled.' Then, realizing that the prosecution had made no objection, he quickly added: 'On motion of the court.' Prosecutor as well as judge?

"A soldier was put on the stand to testify as to receiving a printed communication from one of the defendants—to establish jurisdiction in Washington, D. C. He was the Providence Journal correspondent here. On cross-examination he admitted that it was not the only material he had received; that it was one of hundreds of various propaganda sheets his office received monthly; that he was not in military service at the time, and the United States was at peace. This soldier also admitted that the 'evidence' he had received did not 'undermine his morale' and that he did not know of any other man in the armed services whose morale had suffered from such material.

"At the close of Thursday's session one defense lawyer rose, after the jury had been dismissed, and demanded that all 'evidence' so far admitted, be struck, since not a bit of it had sustained the indictment contention as to 'undermining of the morale of the armed forces' and was nothing but proof that some of the defendants were 'anti-Semitic.'

'The judge ruled: 'Motion denied.

A Tempo of Intimidation

"It is evident now that the planned tempo of this trial was one of fear and intimidation, but it has been utterly frustrated by the courage of these American defense counsel. They have made the affair ridiculous, which is bad for the prosecution.

"Now comes a demand for impeachment of the judge. Perhaps nothing will come of it, but it is bad publicity for the prosecution. The actions of some defense attorneys has been so spectacular that the press had to give the proceedings publicity. Those explosions were 'news,' and it was a real triumph to break through this ban on justice.

"We again held our breath when Edmondson Defense Attorney Frey, suddenly rose and said to the court: 'What kind of procedure is this anyway? I never heard anything like it. Can't we have some kind of orderly procedure here.'

"He was merely told he was 'out of order.'

"Another defense lawyer rose later and heatedly demanded: 'Are proper proceedings of this court to be reversed? There has never been aything like it. Matters which should be excluded are admitted, and vice versa.' He was not reprimanded. He sits next to our attorney, who, in turn, is just in front of my husband. This lawyer, who stands very high in the Washington bar, talks a great deal to my husband.

"Defendant Sanctuary is without a lawyer. His attorney was fined a second time—for 'obstructing justice' because of delay in cross-examination. He had been trying to look over a mass of evidence submitted by the prosecution in order to frame more questions. Masses of evidence are thrown at the defense without proper time for investigation. Protests are over-ruled. Under the circumstances, defense attorneys have performed miracles.

"One prominent defense attorney said to me: "I am intimidated by these fines for 'contempt' by the judge. I admit it. My firm is intimidated. And I know that there are other attorneys who feel the same way. We fear to take proper steps to protect our clients.' 'Planned that way?'

"If there is anything that gets me down, it will be this diabolical Washington heat. A Turkish bath day and night! If it isn't cruel and inhuman 'punishment' to force these defendants to suffer in the inferno of a Washington summer, I would like to know what it can be called.

Legal Error Condoned

"Here is a sample of prosecution tactics. Defense Attorney Lindas arose and asked whether or not the whole piece of evidence, against which defence counsel were objecting, would be presented to the jury. The court assured him that only the article in question would be shown. The entire paper was given to the jury.

"Directly after intermission and before the jury had been summoned back into the courtroom Attorney Lindas again rose and in a voice filled with resentment, said he had a stipulation with the prosecution not to show that particular exhibit for, in the column next to the article in question, was another which described arrest, conviction and sentencing of Lindas' client for another offense. He argued with rising voice that the prosecution had broken its promise, and his client's case had been jeopardized by the fact that the jury had seen proof of previous imprisonment.

"Every one in the courtroom was silent as Lindas sat down, and the prosecution appeared stunned at such a legal error. The judge was dumfounded then announced that he would 'take the matter under advisement.' Lindas demanded dischage of the jury and declaration of 'mistrial.'

"Next day the judge announced denial of Lindas' motion on the ground that Lindas had not sufficiently informed the judge of the basis for the objection and motion. It was a very shabby performance and showed bias. Lindas took an exception. Other defense lawyers shook their heads deprecatingly. Assistant Prosecutor Burns rose and abjectly apologized for the incident, but the damage had been done.

On the same day, Defense Attorney Ennis, read into the record U. S. Supreme Court citations to the effect that extraneous matter should not be interjected in cases—only such evidence as directly concerned charges made. He was objecting to the mass of purely political and irrelevant matter introduced by Rogge. Ennis heatedly declared that this was turning out to be a trial of anti-Semitism and politics. The judge over-ruled his motion. One news commentator said the judge denied motions which came too late and also those which came too early. Strong indications developed showing that the jury was becoming disgusted. Sarcastic smiles at times conveyed an 'eyeful.'

"One day the prosecution entered 85 exhibits as 'evidence;' with Witness Luedtke on the stand. Defense attorneys jumped to their feet and heatedly asked how it would be possible to inspect it when there was but one copy for all the 22 defense attorneys. Then there was a ruckus! 'Do you think I'm going to give my case away' yelled Rogge when he was asked to permit inspection the day previous to introduction.

"The 13th week of this travesty ended on July 13. The general impression now is that the judge himself is not satisfied with the progress made. He must know, from the reactions of the jury, that they are not impressed by the prosecution presentment. And not one piece of so-called evidence shown to the jury is anything but 'Anti-Semitic' and Anti-Communist. Not one! There has been not one thing to link defendants to the charges of the indictment as to undermining the morale of the armed forces.

"The ablest men of the defence counsel have been waiting to find out just what the prosecution had against us; and they are becoming more and more convinced that defendants are innocent. Some of them even said the judge would be forced to deliver a directed verdict in favor of defendants, but we do not want a mistrial. We want to be cleared! One defence attorney told me a mistrial

is desirable as there never would be another indictment like this one if it fails to be sustained; but I very earnestly told him that would not suit many of us.

"We have more reason than ever before to believe that all this tremendous effort and sacrifice is going to pay huge dividends in the future. We are not wishful thinkers. We have watched developments and weighed them carefully, and are good friends with most defence counsel, whom we admire and respect. Our opinions are largely formed from their statements. They are simply 'on top of the world' now, and are losing money daily. The majority are court-appointed without compensation. One lawyer told me he was losing \$2000 a month. But they are now actually joyously fighting this battle, apparently because they feel the prosecution hasn't any case.

"Here is a noteworthy incident: In the outer hall I overheard a correspondent for the Communist Daily Worker talking to some defense lawyers. He remarked: These defendants are certainly good sports. They are taking this trial with a smile, and seem to have a lot of fun with each other. And their lawyers, too!

"I felt like asking him just how he thought we should act. I could have told him we do not know how to act in a guilty manner because we are completely innocent of the charges.

"But it was high praise coming from so foul a sheet as the Daily Worker, and evidently defendants' attitude made a deep impression on him. As a matter of fact, the Daily Worker has lately been maintaining a thunderous silence as to the trial. There is precious little nourishment in the proceedings from their point of view.

Evidence Still Admitted "Provisionally"

"My husband went to the courtroom early on the day heretofore referred to to get affairs in order for his attorney and found a group examining 30 bulletins of his which were to be offered. He asked one lawyer: 'Do you think they are too rough?' The reply came, 'Well, they're true, are they not?' The answer was an unqualified 'Yes.' As a matter of fact Jewish confessions to be presented in documentation-form answer questions themselves.

"On Thursday, Defense Attorney Lindas rose and vehemently objected to prosecution evidence on the ground that it was almost entirely on anti-Semitism. He is a big man and his voice rises to almost a shout when he becomes angry. He told the court that what was being offered was raising a tide of racial prejudice not only in the courtroom but in the District of Columbia; that Jewish members of the Bar whom he had always considered friends were being harmed by the procedure of the prosecution, which was raising this prejudice—not defendants. He demanded a stop to it. The judge reiterated that all 'evidence' was being admitted 'provisionally.' That was that, but it was good news to those of us on trial.

"The 15th week of this strange Moscow un-American trial could well be called 'gala,' permitting a play on the word. Before noon on Monday the court-room was swept by a gale of laughter—and another blew us out on Thursday. The adjectives 'farcical' and 'fantastic' are O.K. in their way, but the real word to be used here is just plain 'cockeyed.' For the trial is being conducted 'in reverse'—the way the Jews read their printing—Defendants and counsel are 'in high' and the prosecution is 'down-under' in the dumps. But the 'motion-denied' droning goes monotonously on.

"Regarding Monday's developments: Defense Counsel Bilbrey is white-haired, meager in frame and has a high sense of humor. He is an adept in cross-examination. He never rubs witness the wrong way, and leads him up the garden path in a way joyous to see. He draws out the most damaging testimony without seeming to do so—and knows when to stop, which, I find, is something very important indeed. He gave an outstanding performance Monday and left a prosecution witness dangling high in the air after proving his point, and did the defence enjoy a big laugh!

"Following the foregoing, Assistant Prosecutor Burns started his ball rolling by offering as evidence about thirty of my husband's bulletins. The principal one was headed 'Roosevelt's Jewish Ancestry,' and when Burns objected to handing that to the jury as it 'would take too much time,' Edmondson Defence Attorney Frey demanded the right to read it. Permission was granted—and it took half an hour. Once the bulletin reference was made to a medal, and Mr. Frey handed to the jury a famous medal with the six-point Jewish star on one side and likeness of Franklin D. Roosevelt on the other, with a Yiddish hierogly-phic of 'Good Luck' inside the star.

"A defence lawyer near me leaned over and gleefully whispered: "Your attorney is getting away with murder. He hasn't any right to do what he is doing," but that is what he did.

Jews Headed Four N. Y. Political Tickets

"Mr. Burns was reading one bulletin published by my husband with all the stops out and emphasis intended to impress the jury with the villainy of Defendant Edmondson, but he read one too many paragraphs—which we believe he intended to omit. The paragraph referred to the N.Y. gubernatorial elections of 1934, when the Jew Lehman headed the Democratic ticket; Moses the Republican; Solomon the Socialist and Israel Amter the Communist ticket. On the bulletin was the Edmondson comment: 'It sounds like the Old Testament—but it must never happen again, for 80% of the Gentile electorate of New York was practically 'disfranchised.'

"Laughter literally deluged the courtroom—and the judge could do nothing to stop it. The jury was one broad grin. Burns snapped that it be shown in the record 'there was much laughter in the courtroom.' Defence Attorney Bilbrev lifted his hand, arose and with smiles wreathing his face, stated: 'I thought it was funny. I laughed.' Defendant Jones put on the crowning touch by rising and saying: 'I want the record to show that Prosecutor Rogge didn't laugh at all.' Then came another gale of laughter, one defence lawyer near me exclaiming: 'That was priceless!'

"No more of my husband's bulletins were read that day, nor all the rest of the week. It was a sad anti-climax to the 'great work' of the prosecution. Edmondson's bulletins turned out to be dynamite!

"Prosecution Witness Luedtke, former Secretary of the German-American Bund, was on the stand all week. Defence attorneys brought out his statement that there was no plot to Nazify the U.S. by any other means than propaganda designed to show the benefits of National Socialism. No force or violence! One attorney went over the 25 points of the Nazi Program in detail, and drew out the statement that it was not based on forceful aggression throughout the world.

"Another defence lawyer took up my husband's bulletins and asked Witness Luedtke if he still believed Jews and Communism were a menace to this

country, as stated therein. "Yes" he replied. Luedtke said Edmondson was known generally not to be against Jews as a race, religion or people, but simply because of what Jewish Leaders were doing politically. He was very respectful of my husband's work, which he admired.

"My husband came out of that 'attack' of the prosecution with flags flying, and that boosted defence morale and standing a lot. Respect and affection are shown him by defence counsel, which makes us very happy. A lawyer of high social as well as professional standing voluntarily joined a warm session my husband was having with his own counsel for not bringing out certain points as per client's directions. This other attorney advised: 'You do as Mr. Edmondson tells you. He has forgot more about the crucial facts of this case than most people ever knew.' You can imagine how I felt about that.

Defense Counsel Fervor

"There has developed a sort of evangelical fervor, patriotic and religious, among defense counsel. They reach higher ground every week. They are simply outdoing themselves. Even the most backward are becoming inspired. Fears are forgotten as the onward march against New Deal subversion, as proved in this courtroom, becomes more and more evident.

Defense Attorney Gallagher, in his inimitable style, quietly and master-tully—in an address exposing what the prosecution was trying to put over on the defendants—declared with indignation that defendants had been brought into court under a 'hypothesis of guilt' before they had even faced a jury. Then he leaned toward the judge and said impressively: 'Your Honor, there is such a thing as a hypothesis of innocence.'

"The judge quickly said: 'I know that, Mr. Gallagher.' 'I was certain you did' was Gallagher's quick comment: 'but I wanted to bring that matter to your Honor's attention and have it placed in the record. I wouldn't be defending my clients as I am, did I believe them guilty of the charges in this indictment.'

"I was so enthralled by the masterful elucidation of this noted professor of law that I can recall but a fraction of the powerful statements he made. It was forensic oratory with no bombast. You could see defense counsel in general were also deeply moved by Mr. Gallagher's arguments.

"There is one court appointed lawyer here who has been reluctant to take a very strong stand, fearing it might react against him professionally and socially; but he climbed on the band wagon this week because of improperly seized documents of his client he had been given to understand he would be permitted to inspect. 'I have been imposed upon' he vehemently declared; and then he opened a powerful attack on the jurisdiction of the court in this case. 'Nothing has been introduced to place the scene of this alleged crime in Washington' he declared. Whereupon Prosecutor Rooge rose and asserted that the Government had proof of jurisdiction in the form of two letters sent to a Post Office Box here. 'Two letters sent to a Post Office Box!' this lawyer scornfully ejaculated, 'Well, if that's all Mr. Rogge has, he has no case.' As he sat down near my husband he nurmured to him 'There is no honor nor decency in this man Rogge.' And were we glad he at last realized that.

"Another star-performer defense counsel then reviewed the whole proceedings, stressing the hardships visited on defendants, many of whom had been impoverished and had to live in cramped and uncomfortable quarters in the terrible heat of Washington; that they had been forced here in violation of Constitutional guarantees, and that the prosecution had not established one point

to prove the indictment charges. The judge usually stops statements like that, but so many citations were introduced that he just couldn't stop this speaker. When he had finished, the lawyer in front of me caught him by the arm saying 'You brought tears to my eyes.' It was a dramatic moment, and raised the trial to a new high. It was the simplicity of sincerity that was moving.

"All Out" For Defendants

"Explanatory of how sincere the foregoing was, let me tell you of a meeting we had with this lawyer and his wife later. He said he wanted his wife to meet us and we went to a quiet place to talk. His wife told me how convinced her husband was of the utter innocence of defendants. He had been approached by Jewish members of the Washington Bar, who told him he was doing himself 'great damage.' His wife said he told them that he didn't care if every Jew in Washington were told about his determination to give the defense all he had, for he believed in their innocence completely.

"This is being written on the first day of the 17th week of the trial. In the last half hour excitement commenced, and defendants and counsel burst out of the courtroom like children from school, laughing, joking and slapping each other on the back. This is what happened.

"Prosecutor Rogge began to read excerpts from Defendant Pelley's writings, in connection with the infamous 14 themes of the notorious Lasswell 'Thought Parallelism' or 'guilt by association', which caused Pelley's conviction on sedition charges.

"Defence counsel were on their feet repeatedly declaring that they had not been supplied with true copies of what Rogge was reading. Rogge became so fussed up that he made errors which probably would not have occurred otherwise. And defence attorneys jumped on his back like a lot of terriers. Finally he dropped his book, and stormed. 'Defense Counsel are running a filibuster against me to cause the jury to lose the import of what I am reading.' Edmondson's Lawyer Frey jumped up, as did many others, but he got in the first word with 'If Mr. Rogge will read correctly there will be no interruptions; if he doesn't do that we'll keep on in the interest of our clients.' So much error popped up that the whole courtroom, including the jury, were laughing. Even the judge smiled, and he didn't 'gavel 'em down' as in the past. Don't ask me twhy—he just didn't. The end result was that what was intended to be importantly impressive ended in a joke—and that was good for us.

"Tuesday the prosecution continued a monotonous reading of the Pelley publications. Many, including jurymen, took naps. One of the most amusing details concerns two alternate jurymen in the front row who sit near me. One is small; the other big, 6 feet tall. After lunch, at times, the big fellow settled down for a good snooze, and the efforts of the little guy to keep him awake convulsed watchers. The little fellow in the middle of some testimony, suddenly nudged the big one. It took frequent nudgings to keep the sleepy juryman from falling out of his chair.

Conspiracy Rule Ignored

"One of the ablest defence lawyers in the court room rose and protested violently" (to use his own term) against the foul blows the prosecution was dealing defendants, declaring it was not only hitting below the belt but was kicking defendants on the shins. Nothing happened.

"On Tuesday our Defense Counsel Mr. Frey pointed out that the attorney for one defendant was absent and therefore defendant was not represented properly. The judge ruled that since that defendant's name was not mentioned in the current proceedings, it didn't matter. 'But,' our attorney remonstrated, 'I remind your Honor again that this is a conspiracy trial and that what affects one affects all.' The judge said 'The ruling stands.'

"Thursday, Prosecutor Rogge handed a great pile of literature to the jury just to look at title pages and names of publishers. Instead of following the prosecutor's instructions to give the matter superficial inspection, they took two hours to look carefully through the whole pile. Rogge cast many anxious glances at the jurymen, and requested a shortening up of the time; but the jury went stolidly on reading. The judge ruled that they could take all the time they needed. Evidently, he did not dare to do otherwise.

"The 18th week of this inquisition ended abruptly today because of the death of an associate justice, a fine man and a just judge of whom we had heard much favorable comment. We were glad of the respite, for almost unendurable summer heat had left us exhausted. But, with it all, there has been no weakening on part of counsel or defendants. In fact, resolution to carry on seems to have been strengthened, for defense lawyers have risen to new heights of righteousness. They are standing on the solid rock of our immortal Constitution, just as our enemies are on the shifting sands of deceit and dishonor. For those of us who revere the Constitution, it is a never-ending source of inspiration. Years ago my husband delivered an address in New York city before an audience of 1500 on "Americanism," in which he said: 'The enemies of our Republican form of Government will wreck themselves on the Rock of the Constitution.' And, verily, that is now proving to be the case. The great men who created that document dedicated to it their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor. Can we do less?

"The faces of all in the court show the devastating effects of this seemingly endless struggle, but morale continues high. We have been literally divebombed, subjected to heavy artillery fire, gassed, and "tanked;" but we have not yielded an inch. The defense attorneys are magnificent. Every day they seem to have found new power, and have forced the enemy back time and again. They have etched into the record the real objective of the opposition—the planned destruction of the fundamental law of the land and the imposition of dictatorship by executive authority.

"Monday opened with a recess for the jury owning to illness of one of its members. The day was taken up with the argument of Defence Counsel Gallagher, as to improper seizure of papers. This was something one reads about, but seldom hears. Another attorney told me: 'That is what is heard in the highest courts of the land, particularly the U. S. Supreme Court—and Mr. Gallagher is second to none in that respect.' It was calm, measured, and logically based on Constitutional rights of defendants. The courtroom was so quiet one could have heard the drop of the traditional pin, yet this gifted man spoke for two hours. We all knew this superlative analysis would be 'overruled'—but it would be in the record.

A "War Search" in Peace Time

"To deny Mr. Gallagher's points the judge had to follow the New Deal Communist Line' by putting the executive above Constitution, as has been so often done during the Roosevelt Administration. The newspapers, commenting on this event, said the judge had 'set up a new precedent.'

After Defense Counsel Gallagher had finished his argument and taken up and concluded another long period in masterly cross-examination of an FBI man who had made a seizure at Los Angles, our Defense Attorney Mr. Frey 'finished him off' in a most unexpected manner. The FBI agent insisted that an 'executive or presidential warrant' authorized him to conduct the 'raid' (as defense counsel insisted on terming it), because it was issued 'in war time.'

• "'When was war declared?' asked our counsel.
• " 'Dec. 8."
• " 'But that was on Japan, was it not?
• " 'Yes'
• "'But that didn't mean we were at war with Germany! This was an anti-German raid.'
  • " I considered we were at war with Germany' replied witness.
  • " 'When did the U. S. declare war on Germany?'
  • " 'On Dec. 11th, 1941."
• "Then, when you made this raid Congress had not yet declared war on Germany. Is that true?"
  • " 'That's right."
• "Then you made this raid while we were technically at peace with Germany, did you not?"
  • "I suppose you can put it that way," was the reply.

"But the judge ruled that because Japan was in alliance with the 'Axis' the President had a right to INFER that we were at war with Germany on Dec. 8, the date of the war declaration against Japan. The court was asked: 'Doesn't that bypass Congress and give the executive the right to 'beat the gun?' But the answer was 'the ruling of the court stands.'

"During cross examination of this FBI witness by Defense Attorney Powers, the prosecutor kept interrupting until Mr. Powers asked him to let him do the examining: but the judge upheld Rogge so many times that Attorney Powers turned loose a savage attack on the way the trial was being conducted. The judge smashed his gavel and everyone jumped. Mr. Powers continued to speak with the judge shouting 'the court has ruled.' Whereupon Mr. Powers marched back to his seat declaring that 'no counsel could properly defend his client in this court.' We held our breath, realizing, from the way the judge looked at Mr. Powers, that a contempt charge was apparently being considered. But evidently the judge feared to take such action; and the incident passed with no more damage than the loss of considerable breath.

"But another defense attorney rose and declared that the rulings of the judge were forcing defense lawyers into a 'condition of involuntary servitude.' Yet all that happened was that he was ordered to take his seat, and the jury was instructed to disregard the matter. We were mighty glad the jury heard it all.

The "Wrong Man" Died

"It was important to us to note that while the Los Angeles defendants did not consent to search, they did not 'obstruct,' for there came citation after citation from the U. S. Supreme Court that 'submission is not consent.' "I am dizzy with this heat. If I should lose my sanity, as so many of our blessed boys in battle are doing, you will read of a demented woman standing on a street corner and yelling to the passing crowd, 'Sheep going to slaughter!' Yet the conviction persists that there is an awakening in the making.

"On August 26, 1944: "Heaven has been kind at last. Cooler weather, which will enable us to live through the rest of the summer. It took four days to cool off the bedrooms where we exist.

"Several amusing incidents occurred while we were milling around the courthouse before the court had proclaimed a recess on account of the death of Associate Justice Luhring. Our Attorney, Mr. Frey, met Defense Counsel Dilling just outside the door, and said to him: 'Do you believe we shall be dismissed for a recess on account of the death of Justice Luhring? He was an upright judge! Too bad he had to die!'

"'Yes, the wrong man died!' Another lawyer who heard the remark, and who has a powerful delivery, sympathetically exclaimed. 'If the right man dies I will take charge of the funeral and declaim a Marc Antony—'I come to bury Eicher, not to praise him!' Which uncovers the intense disgust of counsel.

"But we feel this court battle may have to be fought to the bitter end without short cuts. Indeed, The Constitution itself is embattled in the court-room, and history is being made. Not only are defense counsel not disheartened, their resolution seems to have been strengthened.

"The high spot of the 19th week of this trial monstrosity was an almost two-hour address by Senator Langer on the floor of the Senate. He had spent two days in the courtroom. He seemed to be in a sardonic mood, and gave close attention to proceedings. I did not go to the Senate because I do not wish to miss anything during the trial. When I read later his speech in the Congressional Record my indignation concerning the manner in which the trial was being handled was so red-bot that it is just as well I did not attend.

"The week began by defendants and counsel trooping back to "school" laughing and recounting recess developments. Defence counsel looked weary, as they had used the interim to try to catch up with their own business affairs, working late into the nights. But their high morale was unimpaired, and they were ready for action again. We were startled when we saw the judge. He looked very ill indeed. His personal secretary, who was in court, looks like death. There were rumors that the judge had a heart attack. No verification. Our counsel greeted Rogge, and was irritably asked: 'Why didn't you stay away for another two weeks?' 'With my client's publications coming up today?' our attorney asked and said sharply. 'That isn't the way I do business.'

Devotion to The Constitution

"Material presented showed that my husband had sold, not given his publications to other defendants. No conspiracy there. Defence Counsel John Jackson came to us at lunch and said: 'One of Mr. Edmondson's publications is enough to clear him in the eyes of the jury and completely shows his innocence, for he stated that he had refused to use certain material in his possession as it 'slightly' reflected against his country. Your attorney should emphasize that word 'slightly,' for it means that Defendant Edmondson would not lend himself to even a mild form of criticism of the U. S.—which is enough to prove that he so loved the form of Government of this country that he would have no part in its detraction.' It meant a lot to us, for Mr. Jackson is very conservative.

The waving of a large swastika flag before the jury caused another outburst of indignation by some defence counsel, who insisted that this act was only to try to arouse prejudice in the minds of the jury. One lawyer declared that demonstration was an 'abuse of judicial discretion.' That brought immediate action from the court, who dismissed the jury and called on counsel to justify his allegation. He added ominously, 'there will be no fine this time.' The attorney spoke for several minutes, admitting afterward that 'jail stared him in the face; but that he felt he had a right to make the charge in defense of his client, saying he didn't care whether his client was a German, a Japanese or a Hottentot. He had declared he had meant no contempt of any particular judge, and attention was directed to the fact that he used the words 'judicial discretion.' In his indignation he seemed to be reckless of his own safety. Tension went into high. The judge 'reserved decision.'

"Late Thursday a witness against Jones and Noble went on the stand. On her lap were a pile of typewritten transcripts. She was noted to read whole paragraphs. That aroused defence anger, and protests were made. The judge ruled she might 'refresh her memory.' But, Your Honor, she is more than refreshing memory—she is reading from those transcripts.' The judge said 'the ruling stands.'

"One of the mildest of the defence lawyers became so angry that he made a motion that all her 'testimony' be thrown out, and that she be admonished by the court to refresh from memory. 'Over-ruled,' was all he got. This witness proved to be one of the most assured and positive witness the prosecution called. She refused to answer questions directly, and made a speech. I was watching the jury closely and found that they are laughing at her and not with her. Among other things she boasted of her especially trained memory,' and finally, as a test, Defence Counsel Powers submitted a report of the previous day, and asked her to repeat it. She repeated from memory, and gave a very different account. 'That's all' said Mr. Powers.

"She told of a mock trial which 'impeached' FDR, and upon questioning, admitted that it was not treasonable but in 'bad taste.' Then she heatedly said that international bankers and Jews had been denounced at the meetings.

Prosecution Witness Discredited

"This prosecution witness was on the stand for most of five days. Defence Counsel St. George questioned her on Monday, and when he made little headway Lawyer Ennis said: "Why don't they let her go. She has stood every one of us on our heads, and even though we know she is not telling the truth, we can't pin her down." In the afternoon, Defendant Jones, one of those convicted by her testimony in California, began his cross-examination. He is not a lawyer, and others begged him not to question her. I reminded him that he stood high in tavor with the jury, and not to jeopardize that standing. He replied he would be careful. So the show was on with our hearts in our mouths. But we didn't need to worry.

"Mr. Jones started quietly. The whole courtroom was very quiet, and we were sitting on the edge of our chairs. Mr. Jones finally forced her to admit that he had denounced all 'isms' but Americanism, and admitted reluctantly that she could say favorable things about him. 'But you didn't put those favorable things in your written record, did you?' She was silent and the court upheld her. 'Do you hold Jews engaged in political or economic pursuits are protected by their religion?' asked Mr. Jones. She hesitated and looked inquiringly at Prosecutor Rogge. He blocked an answer by objecting to the question as 'immaterial.'

Defense counsel became aroused by the tricky methods exposed, and one lawyer who had taken little part in protests voiced his resentment. The judge said Counsel waived cross examination.' This attorney snapped: What has that got to do with it—I have risen in the interest of justice.' The decision was over-ruled.

"Defendant Jones' gallant efforts brought Defence Attorney St. George to his feet with the declaration: 'Mr. Jones has done more with this recalcitrant witness than any lawyer in the courtroom, and I strongly object to the treatment he is receiving from prosecution and court.' Mr. Jones said 'That's all' when he found he could not get out all the truth. There was no doubt the jury was with him.

Defense Lawyer Powers questioned an FBI witness who was called Wednesday with regard to search, and asked him whether the accused had broken any Federal Law. The reply was that he was looking to see if they 'intended to.' Mr. Powers then said 'As a lawyer, yourself, don't you know that there can be no search unless there is a charge that the law has been violated?' The witness hesitated and then stated that he thought that was true. 'Then why did you do it?' The witness replied: 'Because I was told to do so.' When he had finished, Mr. Powers warmly congratulated him for his co-operation, which must have impressed the jury in that it showed defense attorneys were interested only in bringing out the truth. It was a fine piece of strategy.

New Deal Tries To "Quiet The News"

"At adjournment time the judge suggested that defence counsel examine records Prosecutor Rogge had collected, so they could proceed the next morning. One defence attorney rose and said he would consent to no such arrangement; that time after adjournment was his to attend to his own neglected business; that he sat four days a week in court without compensation, and he was not willing to do more. Other lawyers joined in his protest, whereupon the judge plaintively commented: 'I hope one or two will be ready to go ahead tomorrow.'

"An important defence lawyer told us Thursday that Charles Michaelson (Jew) of White House and New Deal fame (?), called a conference of newspaper men during the long court recess and appealed to them not to print any more stuff about the trial. All of them in Washington had agreed except Reporter Carter Brook Jones of the Washington Star. Mr. Jones is doing an excellent job.

"The 21st week of trial was begun with a prosecution witness who had been with the American Consulate in Stuttgart, Germany, beginning in 1924, who was asked to state what he could recall of speeches made by Defendants Schwinn and Kunze at a meeting in Germany, which he had reported to his superiors. He remembered that they had denounced Communism and Jews; that no American had been attacked by name, so far as he could remember, except Congressman Schmelka Dickstein. Defendants, their counsel and the jury showed amused appreciation of that. The witness seemed to enjoy it too.

"Do you believe the German Foreign Institute was organized on international lines like the Comintern of the Communists?" The reply was 'No.' Defendant Jones asked 'Did you ever hear of a law being violated before it was passed? There was a prompt and amused 'No.' The jury apparently liked that. But the \$64 questions were asked by Mr. Frey, Edmondson's attorney, at the close of the examination. Witness was shown a diary of Ambassador Dodd

(from the U. S. to Germany) and asked to read a certain paragraph. Then: From that document you will note that Hitler ordered in 1935 the dissolution of all Nazi groups in foreign countries. Would you say anything to the contrary? The answer was 'I know nothing to the contrary.' Then Mr. Frey continued, monitored by my husband:

"Now, Mr. Teller, you were in Germany during the rise of the Nazi regime and during eight years of actual Hitler control of the country. Did you ever, in any way at any time, ever hear of any statement or any act which would lead you to believe that the Hitler regime intended to make an attempt to overthrow the Government of the U. S. by force and establish a National Socialist form of government in this country? The answer was an unhesitating round and resonant 'NO.' And that caused a real sensation. One of the ablest defence lawyers came over and whispered to Attorney Frey: 'You deserve a 'Sieg Heil' for that.' And so ended another move designed to make us all traitors to the U. S.

PROSECUTION DID NOT "COME INTO COURT WITH CLEAN HANDS"

"Three defense attorneys who have been more or less spectators while the fight boiled up, have joined the ranks of vigorous defense, and they are real assets. They have been waiting for nearly five months to see for themselves just what the prosecution had to offer, and now, convinced that the set up is vicious, are going 'all out' for us.

"Defense Counsel Myers for Defendant Hudson is putting new life into the defense, being an exceedingly able lawyer. In an extended address he told the court this week that, in his opinion, after long observation and study, he did not believe any defendant was guilty of the indictment charges; and that is a long way to go for a lawyer who has been as cautions as Mr. Myers. He boldly charged that the court was not being fair to defendants in admitting certain exhibits in evidence. He was very uncomplimentary to the court. When Prosecutor Rogge protested to the judge against the 'rough time' the defense was giving him, Mr. Myers rose and declared: 'Mr. Rogge has not come into this court with clean hands, and has no legitimate complaint to make.'

"This new defense-vigor had given the 'regulars' a breathing spell, and they deserve it. When a prosecution witness was asked to identify Mr. Myers' client, he, the attorney, directed Defendant Hudson to stand up, saying he was proud to have him do so.

"Mr. E. Hilton Jackson, dignified dean of the lawyers, excoriated Prosecutor Rogge for giving out interviews to such communistic publications as 'PM' and the 'New Masses'—which show Rogge's real affiliations. After Mr. Jackson had spoken denouncing Rogge's policies, the judge reprimanded Rogge. While this reprimand was being delivered, defendants maintained an admirable restraint. The marshals of the court and our appointed attorneys often compliment us on good behavior, saying it makes things easier, for them.

"In another argument, Defense Lawyer Gallagher, specialist in Appellate and Supreme Court procedure, was interrupted by Rogge with 'Counsel is misquoting the record'—a grațuitous insult. Mr. Gallagher's voice rose as he retorted 'I am quoting from the record, and in all my experience before the courts of the District of Columbia I have never had my honor impugned except by Mr.

Rogge. I don't know how matters are handled in other jurisdictions, but we don't do that way in this one. Mr. Gallagher said and sat like Homer's heroes. The judge is from another 'jurisdiction.' Some slap-down!

"From what I have written you will be able to judge of the high character of defense counsel. They have to be very able men to, at a moment's notice, take up any and every challenge suddenly sprung on them. It makes me dizzy to follow maneuvers. They seem grimly determined to see that justice shall prevail, realizing that no country falls until its judiciary fails. Almost daily they declare that shall not happen if they can prevent it. There can be little doubt that the fate of the Nation is bound up in the persecution of this odd assortment of defendants, in view of the inescapable fact that day after day new assaults are made on the Constitution.

"After lunch on Wednesday a former member of the German-American Bend was put on the stand by the prosecution supposedly to show the connection of that organization with Nazism. The witness was asked what that organization's aims were. To fight Communism, defend German-American businessmen against the Jew boycott, and try to spread facts about National Socialism, was the surprising reply. Rogge asked the witness if he had ever been convicted of any crime. Defense counsel were on their feet exclaiming over the point that Rogge was impeaching his own witness, and declared that they would take care of any criminal record. They did! From records furnished by the prosecution, defense counsel established the fact that he had served two years for imperiling the morals of a minor female child' and has served for indecent exposure in the Pennsylvania R, R. Station in N. Y. City. You can well imagine the sensation—and disgust. This is an example of the witnesses the prosecution has put on the stand—FBI agents, stooges, criminals, ex-convicts, prejudiced witnesses, cowed Germans fearing concentration camps, etc.

The 23rd week of the trial indicated that even to the lay mind, this farce is degenerating: I try to keep notes of important happenings, but sometimes become so absorbed in this tragedy-comedy drama and even burlesque, that I often find an hour has passed without a line in my diary. Sitting up in front, it is fascinating to watch the faces of counsel, both sides. Mr. Gallagher has a habit of rubbing his hands and gleefully winking as he stops cross-examination when he has made a telling point, and seems delighted when he has forced the court into an absurd ruling, as much so as if he had been given favorable rulings. Defense Attorney Dilling made an objection one day this week and the judge said 'sustained.' Automatically Mr. Dilling replied 'Exception,' and then realized the court had upheld him. The whole court room began to laugh.

"During examination of Defendant Stahrenburg, who had circulated some inti-war material about six months before Pearl Harbor, by Assistant Prosecutor Burns, we began to realize that Burns was breaking down. He made many mistakes, blundering and finally turning on defense counsel white with anger, mouthing a word we could not hear; but instantly several defense lawyers were on their feet protesting that he had used very improper language, demanding an apology. Big Defendant Dennis heaved himself up and declared: 'Mr. Burns distinctly said 'bastard.' After lunch Rogge again took over.

"Apropos of the open contempt defense counsel are showing, recalls a statement made by a friendly marshal of the court. I remarked on how defendants were wandering all over the court, even out into the hall, and how strict the marshals were at the beginning. 'You don't know what orders we got' he said. 'Hold these people down. Get tough! So we thought we had a lot of gangsters to deal with. It speaks well for the conduct of defendants, for the marshals will now do anything for us within reason.

"We went into court Monday fairly walking on air. Judge Eicher had been soundly rebuked by the Appelate Court for his sentence of Defense Counsel Klein for alleged contempt. Its swift action was almost unprecedented. We asked one of the ablest lawyers in court if we were justified in regarding the decision portentous, and he replied: 'I know it is. The Washington Bar is seething with anger at the procedure in this court.'

Roosevelt Smeat Attacked

"All day Monday Prosecution's Witness Winterscheidt was on the stand, and admitted that Germany did not want war, but a peaceful understanding with France and England: that she had no design on the U. S.; was working for white supremacy. None of the statements by this prosecution witness helped the indictment charge of seditious conspiracy by defendants.

"The next witness was a young soldier who had belonged to the Youth Movement of the German-American Bund. Under direct examination by the prosecution he said the Nazis expected all nations to accept their ideology by education. Then the fact was brought out that he had appeared in de-naturalization proceedings, and feared concentration camp. He had our sympathy. From testimony of the prosecution's own witnesses thus far, it is manifest that the motivation against us is for our anti-Communism exposures.

"Defense Attorney Powers, for Defendant Pelley, began an attack on President Roosevelt for his current radio broadcast attack on Pelley's Silver Shirts, declaring he was trying to influence the jury in the seditious conspiracy case. The court ordered him to proceed along 'different lines.' 'Is the President of the United States the only one who has the right of free speech to smear these helpless defendants over the air and in the newspapers?' Mr. Powers angrily demanded, adding 'If so, the people of this country should know it.' The court upheld Prosecutor Rogge's objection.

"Then Defense Lawyer John Jackson, Jr., rose and declared heatedly that the President's denunciation of the 'Silver Shirts' was an attack on every defendant in this cause. He ridiculed the attack, pointing out that defendants could not be faced with their accuser. He cited Supreme Court decisions dismissing cases because of such unfavorable newspaper publicity. The judge stopped all arguments by announcing he would hand down his decision later.

"A prosecution witness by the name of Kempner was then put on the stand. He was a 'refugee professor' from Germany. He claims to be an authority on political economy. It is almost impossible to understand his broken, curious English. The prosecution built him into the status of an expert. Defendant Dennis started the cross-examiation and got Kempner so mad he couldn't speak in English. Another witness was put on the stand after recess, evidently to give Kempner time to recover composure. Later, the latter was again put on the stand, and testified how he had made translation of Hitler's speeches for the U. S. Government. Dennis' examination made him incoherent again, and that ended Tuesday's session.

Prosecution Testimony by Aliens

"The prosecution next put Herman Rauschning, another refugee from Germany, on the witness stand. Defendant Dennis has read and studied most of his books on Nazism and political affairs, and he was qualified better than any one of the defense attorneys to examine this witness. He and Witness

Rauschning enjoyed five hours of academic discussion, the latter testifying that Hitler came to power by nomination of Hindenburg and election by the people, not by force.

"Our attorneys tell us that admission of evidence 'provisionally' is a court confession of doubt that such evidence can be proved. And that sort of admission continues to be practiced on most of the evidence presented by the prosecution. The failure of the prosecution to show incarcerated defendants to be dangerous criminals has turned the tide in their favor, and they are being treated more as human beings, instead of being brutally handled as before. The real cause of the transformation which has taken place, however, is Defendant Elizabeth Dilling, who has performed miracles. She has been to Congress about the bad treatment given them, has flayed authorities responsible, and has seen to it that they had one decent meal daily. Now, all eight of them get all they can eat. One of them told me that he had a headache because he had eaten too much. That blessed Elizabeth Dilling feeds us too well at times' he explained. They love her—and should.

"In the 25th week of the trial defense counsel took over the cross-examination of Prosecution Witness Rauschning, and developed that his affiliations in this country were Jews. Greenburger & Spies were the two lawyers who sponsored the entrance into the U. S. of Rauschning; Leon Lewis, of B'nai B'rith, with his assistant Joe Roos, came into the picture, as did Zukor, Koepel, and Selznick of the movies. Paramount Studios had Rauschning supervise anti-Nazz pictures. Defendant Dilling asked 'Wouldn't it have been more honorable for you to have stayed in Danzig and fought the Nazis? The reply 'It is more healthy to live for a principle than to die for it,' caused a raucus laugh. Even the judge smiled. Under questioning by our attorney, Mr. Frey, Rauschning admitted that 'a man could be anti-Semitic and yet not be a Nazi.' Mr. Frey then asked if he had ever read the Constitution, and whether the word 'Democracy' was contained in it. The witness admitted that 'Democracy' was not mentioned; but he insisted that we had a democratic way of life. Prosecutor Rogge is having a hard time proving that the government of the United States is a democracy-form. The 1928 U. S. Army Training manual says 'The Government of the U. S. is NOT a Democracy, but a Republic.' Mr. Frey got across a lot to the jury, and there was much smiling at my husband, who sat beside his attorney as mentor. Rogge couldn't object to everything, and the lid came off when Defense Counsel Dilling offered 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' for identification. The judge upheld objections.

"The examination of the witness by Mr. Frey was interrupted by recess, and Defendant Dennis rushed over to my husband and tried to stop the Jewish exposure questions which opened up the real problem. Mr. Dennis was told that this subject was the reason we were all in court, and rebuttal was going to be pushed to the limit by Defendant Edmondson.

"Something Smells Bad"

"Prosecution Witness Kempner was back on the stand at the week-end, and when the microphone was put before him to speak he answered one question through the high-geared machine: 'Stink.' Following the most hysterical laughter, he explained 'It means something smells bad.' Off we went again—and a lawyer behind me remarked 'I'll say it does!' One lawyer protested to the court that the witness should translate words as he found them and not the way he felt Hitler meant them; but the judge 'over-ruled.'

By the end of the 26th week almost everyone seemed to be convinced, from the testimony, that Kempner and Rauschning were largely responsible for the language employed in both the indictment and bill of particulars. The phraseology was almost identical. It is a terrible thing when two discredited refugee aliens can indict patriotic defendants in a document designed to deprive them of liberty and citizenship.

"Prosecutor Rogge has abandoned the 'Nazi Conspiracy' terms, substituting 'Nazi Movement,' supposed to include the world. But not one of the prosecution witnesses have testified that there was, to employ the language of the indictment, a 'publicly announced program to destroy democracy everywhere in the world and substitute a Nazi form of government in the U. S.'

"Kempner testified that one proof of Hitler's treason to the Weimar Republic was that he ordered the military forces to have no dealings with Marxism or a democratic form of government—implying that democracy and communism are one and the same thing. Lawyer after lawyer rose and beseeched the court not to try the Nazi regime, saying Rogge had tried seven months to prove a world conspiracy, and had failed. We now ask the court to direct the prosecution to tie defendants into that conspiracy. The judge directed Rogge to 'proceed.' At one time the prosecutor jumped up and whined 'the defense is trying to attack the veracity of our witness.' A young attorney back of me immediately rose and said 'that is the object of cross-examination.' The voice of the judge was weak, and he looked badly, but he ordered over-rulings continually.

"During Defense Attorney Wm. J. Powers' examination of Kempner, he brought out the point the latter had been a judge in the Jewish section of Berlin; that out of the 3000 lawyers Kempner said were in Berlin, 200 were Jews. He asked the witness if he remembered a celebrated case in Berlin of a 'Jewish gentleman' throwing the hat and overcoat of an American attorney on the floor of a restaurant; that when he got out of the hospital the 'Jewish gentleman' sued the American lawyer. The witness did not recall that case. The American lawyer, Mr. Powers stated, was William J. Powers, then General Counsel for General Motors Corp. in Berlin.

"On Thursday Defense Counsel St. George elicited the point that Kempner was born in Poland. 'Was your mother Jewish?' he asked. 'She was German,' he replied. 'Was she German-Jewish?' The reply 'She was German' was repeated. And the jury began to laugh at the repetition. Kempner was asked if the fact that he was a Jew influenced his testimony. He answered 'No,' without denying that he was Jewish. He looks and acts like a Jew.

"The 'evidence' of Rauschning was admitted 'provisionally' over repeated objection by defense. At one point, when defense counsel was insisting that the prosecution had not proven the indictment charges, Prosecutor Rogge jumped to his feet and vehemently declared that the Government believed it had proven its case against certain defendants, and was merely awaiting further disclosures to see how many others could be tied into the conspiracy to undermine the morale of the armed forces.

"A dozen defense attorneys rose, one saying: 'We accept Rogge's bluff. Let him take the case to the jury right now. We are willing.' But Rogge declared he had said only 'certain' defendants, and intended to take his time as to others.

"One amusing situation has arisen which may have repercussions later. Defendants and defense counsel and members of the jury congregate in a little cafe during lunch recess by the court. There they fraternize, sitting together, and

the place is a bedlam of laughter and talking. On strict orders I have stayed away from the jurors, but on Thursday one of them stopped and showed me a Roosevelt button he was wearing upside down. I laughingly remarked that that was a signal of distress. 'This Roosevelt Administration has had the country upside down for many years, so I am wearing the button in the proper way.' One of the prosecutor's spies was seen in the cafe writing down names of jurors and defendants sitting together. It could cause a mistrial if the prosecution wants it that way.

"The 27th week of the 'Mess Trial' (new name) ended yesterday with the Jewish Refugee Kempner still on the witness stand. Incidentally, history will record that not one native-born witness has appeared against us; that the liberty, health, happiness and in some cases, the lives of 26 American patriots will depend on the judging, by the jury, of the alien 'evidence!' Not one scrap of real evidence has been thus far introduced in support of this prejudiced indictment.

"When Defense Attorney Dilling was pressing the witness about his exalted biographies, Rogge intervened and declared the witness was 'too modest' to have furnished much of the material. A derisive hoot went up, and the jury grinned. When one lawyer stressed the point that nothing the Kempner witness testified to had anything to do with the indictment charge that defendants had undermined the morale of the U. S. military forces, Rogge rose and angrily made the statement that the charge is disloyalty to a democratic form of government.' Whereupon furore broke out, and one attorney shouted 'Mr. Rogge just isn't honest. That is the charge, and he knows it.' He demanded that the indictment be read into the record. The judge denied the motion. He then demanded that the record show he took a strong exception to the court's gaveling. This is the first time he has reacted in that manner. He as hitherto been most meticulously careful in his court demeanor. One thing is sure, the defense is not jittery. The defense attorneys know they are on the solid rock of the Constitution.

Court Conduct Boldly Challenged

"On Tuesday Mr. Frey, our attorney, took over, and waked up the courtroom. He had pages of questions, carefully prepared by my husband, which
were all on the subject of Anti-Semitism and Communism. This time he stuck to
the questions—and they were deadly. He had the courtroom in an uproar, and
the defense counsel, with few exceptions, backed him. One of them muttering
'Pour it on, Bert.' Mr. Frey is popular with the jury, the defendants and their
counsel. But I sat in a cold chill, for I never knew where his enthusiasm would
lead him. When Rogge objected frequently, Mr. Frey heatedly ejaculated: 'Now,
Your Honor, I have a right to ask those questions about the Jewish Problem.
Defendants didn't bring up that subject—the prosecution did. Mr. Rogge objects
to my right to ask these questions and Your Honor sits up there and sustains
him.'

"I groaned 'Lord, thats done it.' But the judge, who also seems to like Mr. Frey, calmly said: 'Mr. Frey, do you wish to withdraw that remark about the court?' Mr. Frey explained that he really had not meant contempt of court, but that he was very tired of Rogge's continual objections and of being over-ruled. The matter passed off that way, but the courtroom and the jury apparently thought Mr. Frey was going to be 'cracked down.' It seemed to us a narrow escape. We begged him to be more careful. To the question as to whether or not a patriotic American could be anti-Communist and anti-Semitic without being a Nazi, Witness Kempner replied 'Yes' before Rogge could object.

"Then Prosecutor Rogge rose and declared in a rage that defendants used

the term 'patriotic' for 'fascist.' There was a mighty protest to that, and the court struck the remark from the record. Everybody's radiator boiled over with plenty of steam. I suspicion Rogge knows he is losing. He blew up completely when Mr. Frey, talking loudly and rapidly brought out the point that Rogge has sat on the same platform with Communist Leader Earl Browder in a Red Front meeting in New York. Mr. Frey was closer to the jury than Rogge, and they heard it, and were laughing.

Defense attorney St. George rose and said that the subversive forces in this country were doing exactly what they were trying to convict us of doing. I wish you could have seen the delighted grins and expressions of approval from defendants. Although the Jewish Question is the heart of this prosecution, the efforts made to suppress it cannot fail to be evaluated by the jury.

"When a Catholic attorney asked Witness Kempner about freedom of religion in the Reich and Russia, the latter admitted that no religion was permitted in the Soviet; that there was in the Reich, but that priests and ministers were not free. 'Did not the Nazis profess Jesus Christ, Savior of Mankind?' asked this lawyer, crossing himself and bowing at the words 'Jesus Christ.' Twice he pressed the question, making the same gesture; and finally Kempner, face blood-suifused, shouted: 'No, they said he was a Jew.' The attorney should then have asked: 'Did not the Jews themselves renounce and crucify Christ.' But that point was lost. It was very moving, emotionally.

A Wrong Search and Seizure Exposed

"Kempner admitted that the Jewish Question was a world-wide problem: that it was purely political; that the trouble in Germany was first made by riots and power-grabbing of Communists; and then control was brought about by the Nazis.

"We were much pleased in the 28th week of the battle, to find that defense attorneys, almost solidly anti-New Deal, were even more aggressive, and pitched into the prosecution with renewed vigor, notwithstanding Roosevelt was re-elected. I was much intrigued also to find that members of the jury were just as friendly as ever, if not more so. The continual introduction into the trial of Anti-Semitism and Anti-Communism has evidently had an enlightening effect.

"On Monday the search and seizure of our papers on July 24, 1942, in California, came up for hearing, and lasted until Thursday. Details of the arrest were thoroughly aired. The facts are: While I was saying 'goodnight' to neighbors who had been enoying a cool evening ride with us in our car, I saw my husband walk back to another car parked in our roadway. I went to find out what it was about, and my husband told me he was under arrest on a charge of seditious conspiracy. The announcement shocked and stunned me so much that I turned and went into our home. I saw my husband put the car in the garage, and the men then came into the house, Deputy Marshall first, my husband second, the other deputy last, the correct order after arrest.

"I regained some composure by that time, and we talked for about 15 minutes. Since it was too late to get bail, I was told where to bring it at Sacramento next day. Then the Deputy Marshal said: I shall have to search your quarters.' Since arrest had already been made there was no resistance. Upon demand for correspondence files, my husband turned them over. They then returned to the living room from my husband's bedroom and, despite vehement protests from me, literally stripped my personal desk. They took intimate letters among them one my mother wrote just before her death.

"They started for the Sacramento jail about 10:30 P.M. The next day, Saturday, I reached the marshal's office as soon as I could and posted \$5000 bail. We returned home. I was so ill that my physician kept me under opiates for three days.

'In the courtroom the marshal testified that he did not make the arrest in the driveway, but in the house, which was a lie. He said he was 'invited' into the house, another lie. He asserted that the car was not put away before entering the house, but afterwards. He said he read the arrest warrant in the house, whereas there was no arrest-warrant nor search warrant. The truth is that he showed a telegram calling for the arrest. Both deputies admitted that they had no search warrant. The marshal said he had an arrest-warrant issued, returned July 24. We were able to prove in court that the arrest-warrant was produced at removal hearings on Oct. 5, 1942, and that it was dated July 31. So, according to that statement, it was impossible for him to have served such arrest-warrant July 24. He used the telegram as authority for the search, according to his testimony.

"The testimony was before the jury, and our attorney, Mr. Frey, exposed the marshal as a liar when his assistant deputy took the stand. The assistant testified that the car had been garaged, as stated by me, before they had entered the house. When the marshal was returned to the witness stand, he changed his testimony, and said he 'thought' the car had been put away after entry. The effect on the jury and other defense attorneys was unmistakable.

"The marshal explained his search of my desk on the ground that I told him my husband used the desk at times, when the truth was—and I testified to it—he was told that I alone used said desk. They both admitted that I protested strongly, and that my husband also protested.

Arrest Deputy "Takes a Walk"

One defense attorney asked the Marshal if he had a certified copy of the arrest warrant. He said 'No.' To be legal a warrant for search must be certified. He said the defendant 'just handed' to him all material taken from the latter's room. 'How many pieces of material were taken?' he was asked. 'From two to three thousand,' he answered. The attorney paused and smiled. He counted the pieces taken. They numbered 18. He then added sarcastically that to get 18 pieces out of two or three thousand was nothing short of amazing.

"On Wednesday the assistant deputy was sitting outside the courtroom in the outer hall. When one of the court attendants told him how things were going, he grabbed his hat and left saying 'This is no place for me. I don't want to go back on that stand.' And that was that! Decision was reserved.

"During the defense arguments one attorney was ruled as 'out of order' by the court, whereupon his voice in a shout declared: 'I have been practicing law in Washington for 35 years, to find that I don't know anything about law.' The court said: 'Mr. Bilbrey, you are out of professional bounds.' Mr. Bilbrey snapped: 'I don't know whether there are any professional bounds in this court. I am held not to know the difference between argument and objection, and I ask that I be dismissed from this case.' The judge said 'Motion denied.' Defence Counsel Powers, after being gaveled down, shouted: 'I object and protest against this gaveling. There seems to be perjury in this court, and something ought to be done about it.' All he got was 'Motion denied.'

"Henry D. Allen was put on the witness stand by the prosecution. Mr. Allen testified about a meeting between Defendant Winrod and Bund Leader Kuhn with the idea of co-operation, but each wanted to do things their own way, and the conference ended unpleasantly. So much for 'conspiracy.'

"The 29th week of the ordeal proved to be important and impressive. The dam broke. Informed defence attorneys directed the flood of damaging testimony to where it would do the most good. The violent objections of Rogge were swept away by the force of the torrent. Even the judge failed to sustain him at certain points.

"There can now be no doubt in the minds of the jury that Communism is Jewish-directed and financed. Prosecution Witness Allen gave measured damning testimony calmly and clearly, and when he broke down later and wept over his injured son, the stark truth burst out and the effect was overwhelming.

"Despite Prosecutor Rogge's efforts, the testimony of Witness Allen was very favorable to the defendants. He said not one defendant, to his personal knowledge, had any idea of destroying our republican form of government, but all were struggling to protect it. The battle was fascinating. Rogge lost!

No "Seditious Conspiracy" Testimony

"When queried as to his experience in regard to co-operation among the defendants he visited, Witness Allen said 'there wasn't any.' Outside of the fact that they were all exposing Jewish Communism, they agreed on nothing; everyone insisted on proceeding in his own way. Seditious conspiracy?

"Almost two hours were taken in arguing against the admission of Defendant Deatherage's material, many defence counsel declaring that most of the matter was regarding the ages-old Jewish Question; but the judge finally admitted it 'provisionally.'

The prosecution had been trying to show up Henry Hamilton Beamish, member of a prominent English family who was imprisoned under the infamous 18-B Act of Great Britain, as a great villain; but the laugh is on Prosecutor Rogge because Beamish was unconditionally released in July, 1943, with no stigma of crime. One defence counsel referred to Beamish as a patriot; so you can see we have sold them on our truthful reporting.

"Defence Counsel Wm. J. Powers, who is a joy to us, rose one day and declared he did not join in the protest against the length of the trial, for he finds the Washington climate agreed with him, has opened a branch office here, has brought on a large part of his law library and is beginning to speak with a southern drawl. That is but one incident showing that many attorneys, though daily losing money, have by no means lost their sense of humor. Mr. Powers is a walking dictionary on constitutional law—and he loses no opportunity to 'throw that book' at the prosecution.

"Mr. Powers asked Witness Allen how much he was being paid to testify. Mr. Allen answered \$4.50 per day. Mr. Powers remarked that that did not seem fair, for Witness Kempner said he got \$25 a day plus expenses; but then he added meditatively 'Refugee Kempner came at a great sacrifice since he stated on the stand that his consultation fees were \$75.'

"Prosecutor Rogge jumped to his feet and angrily protested, saying Mr. Powers was 'trying to make a hostile witness more hostile.' At that Witness

Allen requested the court to grant him permission to make a statement, which was denied. Upon Mr. Powers' insistence Mr. Allen was finally permitted to say that he was here to tell the truth, and that was what he had been doing; that he resented the prosecution's charge that he was hostile.

Courtroom Electrified by Witness

"It was on Wednesday when Witness Allen electrified the courtroom, Defence counsel St. George asked the witness if he had ever been personally injured in riots precipitated on the West Coast during his anti-Communist meetings. He recounted a terrible beating to which he and his son had been subjected. He himself was in the hospital for a week. He said he knew his son was in the same hospital, but had not been informed as to the latter's injuries until his release. Then' he testified, 'I found out that besides being beaten into insensibility there had been a rupture of my son's . . . 'at this point he broke down and sobbed. Instantly a heart-rending cry of 'O, Daddy' came from the other side of the courtroom, and his youngest daughter rushed over to him threw her arms around him, put her head down on his shoulder and wept with him. Then his wife and other daughter came to the witness chair.

"We were all frozen in our seats, and there wasn't a dry eye in the jury, among defendants and defence attorneys. One of our counsel asked the judge for a recess to permit the witness to recover. This was granted, and we all left the room emotionally moved to the depths. Evidence of shock and pity was on the faces of jurors, as I looked at them with my own eyes swimming in tears.

"The last three benches on the left side of the courtroom had been filled with Jews. When we returned to the courtroom after recess, no Jews were seen. They fear emotion because it develops violence at times.

"Returned to the witness stand Mr. Allen stated that the left eyeball of his son had been gouged and ruptured so badly that it had to be removed and he is now wearing a glass eye. After trying to enlist for combat duty he was now helping to train flyers in a mid-west training camp.

"Can you imagine what a scene like that has done to the cause of the persecutors? Especially as Mr. Allen had been summoned as their own witness Later Defence Attorney Jackson Sr. said to me: Rogge is dead. He doesn't know it yet. All that remains is to bury him and deliver the funeral oration, and I would like to do it."

"Later, when we personally expressed sympathy and horror to Mrs. Allen, she told me that they expected more trouble because of what Mr. Allen had said on the stand. 'But' she said 'We are determined to go through with it.' Mr. Allen goes back on the stand next Monday. One of the defence attorneys was talking with one of the jurors, and 'wondered' how the jury was 'taking' some of Allen's testimony. 'What are YOU worrying about?' the juror remarked. 'He's YOUR witness, isn't he?' How's that?

"Here is the 30th week of the Rogge prosecution. Contrary to proper procedure, he is presenting much new material largely from testimony before two Grand Juries, given by Witness Allen; but thus far Mr. Allen has been able to justify himself. The most cautious and dignified defence lawyers are now showing their contempt of the court. The looks of disgust on their faces, shaking of hands between them, after adverse rulings by the judge, cannot fail to have an effect on the jury.

No Undermining of Soldier Morale

"Mr. Allen testified without reservation that not one defendant he knew in the anti-Communist crusade ever had any idea of trying to corrupt the morale of the military forces; to the contrary, they wanted a strong army and navy to protect the United States from a communist take over of the Nation. Mr. Allen also testified that the Jew lawyer with the military commission who ejected him from his California home, told him that he was 'a Jew-baiter and a Nazi.'

"Mr. Allen testified that Elizabeth Dilling's 'Red Network' had been used as a text book by the famous 'Red Squad' of Los Angeles which had done important work in breaking up subversive Communist meetings until it was suppressed. Thousands rioted, he said, and the frenzied 'Jewish faces' screamed in a terrifying manner. He identified pictures of the worst disturbances.

"Rogge objections sustained by the court were apparently so unfair and without legal basis that Defence Lawyer John Jackson, a meticulously correct attorney, moved for a mis-trial on the grounds that defendants were being denied due process of law. Other defence attorneys supported him. Defence Lawyer Powers declared 'the wholesale denial of due process rights is so gross that I join in Mr. Jackson's motion.' It was denied.

"Our attorney, Mr. Frey, offered the Bible for identification, was opposed by Rogge, and was sustained by the court. Defence Attorney St. George called all defense counsel to leave the courtroom in protest against railroading of defendants. One lawyer said 'the court can put us in jail for that,' Mr. St. George declared that he was willing to go to jail if he could protect 'these innocent defendants' from being denied their constitutional rights! This reflects the righteous wrath of members of the Bar regarding the disgraceful procedure in this 'mess trial.'

"Witness Allen ended his court ordeal on Monday, and emerged victor. Mr. Allen testified again that all defendants he knew worked separately except for the good of the cause.' Rogge would not permit him to say what that common cause was. But the question was later answered on cross-examination. The reply was 'to rid the United States of Jewish Communism.'

"Mr. Allen circumvented the prosecution when Rogge handed to him copies of his Dies Committee testimony and that before two Grand Juries, asking if it was true. Mr. Allen replied: 'I may have said that then when I was under great pressure and duress. I had been threatened and intimidated. But what I am now testifying to is the truth and nothing but the truth.'

Prosecutor Rogge Gets a Shock

"Prosecutor Rogge would stand and stare at him, then turn away, and produce another document, with the same result. The witness repudiated much previous testimony. There was no doubt in the minds of many listeners that he was really telling the whole truth at this time. Evidently, Rogge could do nothing about it. He was completely baffled. He did not dare try to impeach Mr. Allen, who had so obviously won the sympathies of the jury. Mr. Allen told us later that he had seen his chance to 'right some wrongs,' and help the defense at the same time; that he decided to do so regardless of consequences.

"On Monday the Deatherage exhibits were turned over to the jury. They took their time. Tuesday's session was a weird one. Silence all day except for announced recesses. Defendants wandered in and out of the courtroom at will. On Wednesday the jury was still absorbed in the exhibits. The judge swiveled

around in his chair at times, held his arms over his head, from time to time mopping his face—yet it was too cool in the courtroom for many of us. In response to an inquiring gesture, I saw his personal secretary form her lips to the word 'sick.' But the judge stayed in the courtroom. Finally the jury concluded their exhaustive examination of the 'evidence' against Defendant Deatherage.

The following speaks for itself:

SEDITION TRANSCRIPT A LA EICHER By Ellis O. Jones, 1944 Mass-Case Defendant (Copyright, 1951)

Mr Worm:

Your Honor, there's a question-

The Court: Mr. Worm:

ofter a suggestion

The Court:

Overruled! u don't be very quiet, ontempt or very nigh i

It's contempt or very night For incitement unto riot.

Mr. Small:

Now, Your Honor, my objection-

Mr. Small:

trifling correction—

The Court:

overruled! s to all you other sitters will fine the first that titters.

or today I've got the jitters.

Mr. Meck: The Court:

Please the court, I've got a notion-

Overruled!

Mr. Meek:

That I'd like to make a motion

Overruled!

If you dare to sneeze or cough of Make an offer of a proffer.

I will jail you as a scoffer.

Mr. Weak: The Court: Please Your Honor, may I mention-

Overruled!

Mr. Weak:

But Your Honor, our contention-

Overruled!

On behalf of the defendants

I will summon the attendants.

Overruled!

Mr. Fogg: The Court: As to this new situation-

and you a citation?

The Court:

Overruled!

There's a certain individual By the name of Fanny Biddle Says to grill you on the griddle

Overruled!

Mr. Hazy: The Court: Mr. Hazy: Now this latest court decision—

uts the whole case in derision

Never mind. My ruling newish And my whole demeanor shrewish Are because you're anti-Jewish.

Overruse

Mr. Tyro: The Court: Mr. Tyro: Please the Court, I'd like a hearing-

But this point requires clearing.

There is nothing to unravel. If you don't shut up your cavil. I will smack you with the gave.

Mr. Rogge: The Court:

Speaking for the prosecution— It's sustained.

We believe the best solution— It's sustained.

State your motion, Mr. Rogge.

Be it sound or be it soggy. Be it clear or be it foggy, It's sustained.

JUDGE EICHER DIES

"At 10 A.M. on Thursday our Defence Counsel Mr. Frey telephoned us reporting the death of Chief Justice Eicher, and said we need not go to court. As though I would miss that session. The first comment by my husband was 'God has taken a hand in this battle.' As we stepped off the street car going to court we met one of the defence attorneys, who quoted 'De Mortuis nil nisi bonum.' We assured him that we did not need his warning. 'Well' he remarked, 'We can shake hands about it anyway.'

"The court was opened by Justice Proctor in a very subdued atmosphere. The defendants had grim faces. Justice Proctor officially announced the death, and set the following Thursday, Dec. 7, for further action. When the short session ended, defendants and their counsel met immediately in a long strictly private conference. It was decided that the next move would be left to the prosecution; that the defence would take no action until after next Thursday's session of the court.

"One thing seems certain, no other judge in the District of Columbia will take the case again. An outsider would have to be called, and he might be as bad, or worse, than Judge Eicher.

"New York's 'uptown edition of the communist Daily Worker, PM, published a paragraph complimentary to defendants, to wit:

"The air of the courtroom appeared one of sincere mourning for the late Chief Justice. If any of the defendants felt relief at the chance they would get a mis-trial, their faces didn't show it."

"Much credit is due these harrassed, weary and persecuted defendants to have a report made about them by such a notorious smear-sheet. That our conduct was eminently correct is completely vindicated by this publication. Any disorder which may have occurred in the past was due to wild-man Rogge and his outrageous attempts to undermine the Constitution.

"A friendly newspaperman told my husband of an 'off the record' interview he had just had with Rogge, who, he said, is 'mad as hell over Eicher's death,' charging that the defence had 'killed the judge.' Rogge is reported as trying to impound the trial records, so defence counsel can't use them. He has declared the case is not going to be dropped. One defence attorney asked my husband if he thought the case would be dropped. He replied 'not now. I know my Jews.' The attorney commented 'I believe you are right.'

"We feel sort of dazed over this interposition of Providence. We had braced ourselves for continued resistance and fight. Now, the necessity for 'forward march' has been removed. We seem to be temporarily off balance.

"One of the most prominent of our defence lawyers said to me: 'I just would not have believed if my best friend had told me of the preposterous things which happened at the mistrial. I could not have imagined how such judicial procedure could take place. But I saw and heard with my own eyes and ears this dreadful perversion of justice.' He also told me of relays of Washington lawyers who had from time to time attended the Eicher court sessions, and were as convinced as he was.

"The 32nd week of the Roosevelt Administration mass-persecution finally halted officially Dec. 7, 1944. Defendants and counsel sat in solemn silence awaiting the appearance of Justice Proctor in the courtroom at Washington. There was no exultation visible, for we had not achieved our objective of complete legal vindication. Nevertheless, all the plot-attacks against us thus far have been 'licked.' Proceedings were conducted on strict lines. The marshal in charge announced that there was to be no whispering; doors were to be locked; no one could leave the room until the judge had delivered his pronouncements; no one was to stand up, and any demonstration would not be permitted.

Court Declares "Mis-trial"

"Justice Proctor used no voice amplifier, but the room was deathly still. And we heard his voice distinctly. He had no authority to dismiss the case, and was acting today in accord with a banc of justices who, last week, sat in consultation.

"A transcript of what Justice Proctor said, taken by my husband in short-hand, is very interesting. I think it is the only shorthand report made of that address. Justice Proctor said trial could not continue unless all defendants agreed to do so under another judge, and that a roll call would then be taken to learn their decisions. In a way we felt sad when voice after voice recorded a firm 'NO,' for we all felt we were saying farewell to a jury that was with us heart and soul, and we did not know what the future held for us in that respect.

"After almost every defendant had voted against continuance, Justice Proctor announced a mis-trial and discontinuance of the case. He then thanked and dismissed the jury, directing them to leave the courthouse immediately, asking them not to talk to anyone as to their opinions. Our counsel said that was an unusual procedure, for juries have a right to say all they wish after a case has been discontinued. They believed the judge had yielded to a request from the prosecution, which knew the jury would want to shake hands with us, and might have talked. As we left the courtroom a rumor spread that one juror had told a criminal court justice that the jury would have handed in a 'Not Guilty' verdict for all defendants in fifteen minutes. I can believe that.

"Justice Proctor delivered high praise of all defence counsel, saying they had upheld 'the highest traditions of the legal profession,' and that the public owed them a great debt of gratitude. Note that these are the men whom Rogge accused of having 'killed the judge.' We defendants were indeed happy to hear this laudation go into the record. But it would be almost impossible to recompense defence attorneys for their services and huge financial loss over the period of 7½ months of devotion to the Constitution.

"This ending has been a body blow to the Department of 'Injustice.' What the prosecution will do in the future, is not known. This enemy of ours

is endowed with 'implacable hatred of all mankind,' to use the words of Historian Gibbon in his 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.' We are still held under bail.

"It remains to be seen whether addenda will be written. While we did not win the official 'Not Guilty' for which we fought; still, a great victory has really been had by us—as well as a defeat for the Jew-Communist enemy almost as great as that which my husband won in New York, when Jews, afraid to face truth, retreated and begged the court by a roundabout amicus curaie petition to dismiss the group libel charges against him as without warrant in law,' in rurtherance of justice,' in the public good' and as 'a violation of the free press guarantee of the U.S. Constitution—which rock fell upon and broke the back of the mass-case indictment in Washington, thanks to a magnificent detence by 'the immortal twenty' lawyers who went 'all out' for justice."

The following diary of January 21, 1945, written at our California home, reported ending Washington incidentals overlooked previously:

The fine record we had all made with the correspondents of the great press services toward the end was a real reward, although they were not allowed to print the proceedings as they saw them; but they showed their sympathy and friendliness.

"Ann Hicks, of the United Press, asked me, after the mis-trial was declared: 'How do you feel about this, Mrs. Edmondson?'

"I replied that my husband and I were very sorry to have it end as it did; that we were well satisfied with the way things were going, and that every day was proving our innocence.

"She gravely said she thought that that was the way we felt.

"Dr. Frank Kingdon, himself a radical, who daily reported the trial on the air, was finally barred from mentioning it because, it was said, his reports were too favorable to defendants.

"Our victory—and it was a victory—was gained on the prosecution's own time. The defence did not have to prove innocence by rebuttal. We were forced to accept the gage thrown down by the prosecution and we defeated him on his own battle ground.

"When we started for Washington last March I told my husband that we would have to have miracles if we were not to be imprisoned. We got miracles—for they were beyond human management.

"Without vanity but with humility I make the statement that the defence lawyers learned to respect and defer to my husband's wise and relevant suggestions, and treated him with real affection. Defence attorneys Gallagher, Powers, Grant and St. George, rose personally to his defence, explaining that they were not speaking for their clients but "for Mr. Edmondson." Mr. Kelly, former Assistant Prosecuting Attorney for the District of Columbia, voluntarily offered his services—'anything I can do for you, Mr. Edmondson, let me know.' We sold our innocence—and our Cause—to these keen courageous men, all but three of whom were unpaid.

"Mr. George E. Sullivan, prominent Washington attorney, counsel for the American Coalition of Patriotic Societies, had offered to appear as a character witness for my husband, as well as an authority on Jewish Communist subversions. He shook hands with us warmly, and said to me. I have heard the

finest reports of the dignified conduct and courage of you and your husband and of the highly intelligent manner in which he directed his defence. You both played a large part in maintaining the high morale of defendants and in convincing counsel of Mr. Edmondson's innocence. I cannot express myself too strongly in this commendation.' That is something of which to be proud.

"We met the enemy in New York City and Washington—and defeated him. He may try again! Maybe not!"

The prosecution in the seditious conspiracy case indicated that defendant's thesis that "Communism is Jewish" is false. In rebuttal Defendant Edmondson prepared as below a double-column comparison court "exhibit" documented.

DEADLY PARALLEL

COMMUNIST INTERNATIONALE

Objectives and Strategy

World Dictatorship Political Economic

"Father of Modern Communism" Karl Marx.

Communism is International

Communism is anti-national

Communism wars on Fascism. "The essence of Fascism is Nationalism, while that of Bolshevism is Internationalism."—"Germany and England" by N. H. Webster.

Communism denounces anti-Semitism; Communist Russia has outlawed it.

Communists are parasitic, unable to live

Communism is a materialistic doctrine.

Communism is ALIEN to national des-

Communists are a noisy minority in all

Communism stands for racial equality.

JEWISH INTERNATIONALE

Objective and Strategy

World Dominion via "Chosen People" Ideology.

Karl Marx was son of a Jewish Rabbi. "Stranger Than Fiction," by Rabbi Lewis Browne, says "Jewish histories rarely mention the name of Karl Marx, though in his life and spirit be was far truer to the Mission of Israel than most of those who are forever talking of it. His book, "Capital" is called the Bible of the Socialist movement."

Jewry is International.

Jewish Internationalism is anti-national. Modern Nationalism... is our CHIEF ENEMY." — "Race Nation Religion" by Rabbi Sol. B. Freehof. Nationalism is a danger for the Jewish People." — Chicago Jewish Sentinel, Sep. 25, 1936. "Jews are the only cosmopolitan people, and in this capacity are acting as a SOLVENT of national differences" — London Jewish World, Feb. 9.16, 1885.

Jews continually attack Fascism,

Jews wage war continually on anti-Semitism everywhere. "Anti-Semitism is the antagonistic attitude produced in the non-Jew BY the Jewish group." — Jewish Scientist Albert Einstein, Collier's Weekly, Nov. 26, 1938. "The general causes of anti-Semitism have always resided in Israelitself." — Jewish Author Bernard Lazare. "The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers. . . it is a world political question."—Jewish Leader Theodor Herzl.

History shows that Jews are notoriously parasitic, and unable to tun a nation of their own.

lews are notorously materialistic

"The Jew is the perpetual alien."—From "Organized Anti-Semitism in the U. S., by Donald Strong, 1941. "Jews are everywhere to a large extent, ALIENS."—"You Gentiles" by Maurice Samuel.

Jews are a noisy minority in all nations.

Jewish leaders constantly call for moial equality.

Communism promotes civil war by general strikes, riots and sabotage.

Communism regiments the masses,

Communists promote pacifism to ge-

Communists refuse to amalgamate with other political parties, boring in to destroy them, as witness the CIO Political Action Committee subotage of Democratic Party.

Communist propaganda is worldwide.

Communist avenues to political power lie through Democracy and Socialism.

Communistic avenue to economic power is via state capitalism. We Jews are at the bottom of nearly all your wars "— Rumanian Jew Marcus Eli Ravage in Century Magazine, Jan. Feb., 1928. "The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world."—Gen. George van Horn Moseley, USA retired, N. Y. Herald-Tribune, Mar. 29, 1939. "Zionists helped to bring America into the war (Warld War No. 1)"—London Jewish Chronicle, Feb. 7, 1936. "The 2nd World War is being funght in defence of the fundamentals of Judaism."—Chicago Jewish Sentinel, Oct. 8, 1942.

Jewry is the greatest regimented "solidurity" in the world.

Jews are notorious pacifists, in theory.

"Assimilation is impossible." — From "Israel" by Jewish Author Ludwig Lewisolm. "We Jews are a distinct nationality." —From "Jewish Problem" by Jewish Justice Louis D. Brandeis. Samuel I. Rosenman, "Roosevelt's Right Arm," was quoted in N. Y. Times Feb. 1, 1936, as "sharply attacking assimilation of Jews" into the nations wherein they live.

Jewish internationalism propaganda is worldwide. "The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction, is in the hands of Jewish agents." — From "The Jews" (1924) by Hiliare Belloc.

Jewish "avenues to political power" are through promotion of democracy, Socialism and Communism. "There is only one way by which the American people can escape Communism and Fascism and that is by establishing A THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY." — Central Conference of American Rabbis, N. Y. Times, Sep. 13, 1936. "If the Jew wishes to survive he must identify himself with Communism." —Jewish Author Michael Alper in Rabbis Wise's magazine "Opinion" of November, 1934. "The undeniable problem of the Jew can only be solved in a Socialist society." Jewish Author Broady in the communistic "New Masses," May 12, 1936. "It is they (Jews) who are the creators of Democracy, Socialism and Communism."—Jewish Poet Bailik in "Lines of Communication" of Pulestine, July, 1933.

"Jews made an art of lending money; they fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money; they became Lords of Money and Lords of the World."—From Jews & Modern Capitalism by Werner Sombart. "By holding gold they (Jews) became masters of their masters."—From "Anti-Semitism" by Jewish Author Bernard Lazare. "The sole aim of these international (Jewish) financiers is world control through the creation of inextinguishable debt."—British Economist Arthut Kitson, in "National Review" of London, March, 1925. "The Jew

Communism rules by fear and terrorism.

Communist attack strategy is smear-association and "proof" by inference and imputation, concealing subversive activities of itself by accusing the opposition of trying to accomplish what it itself is actually DOING

Communism is Bolshevism — Russia is Communist.

Communist revolutionaries captured Hungary, Rumania, Czecho-Slovakia and almost won in Spain.

Communism backs the New Deal in U.S. "The Communist movement in the U.S. is an alien conspiracy."—Dec. 29, 1934, report to Congress by American Coalition of Patriotic Societies.

evolved organized capitalism with its instrumentality the banking system. —American Hebrew, Sep. 10, 1920. "Anti-Jewish discrimination in the countries surveyed centered ENTIRELY ON THE ECON-OMIC LIFE OF THE JEWS."—A Report by Dr. Lvovich. Officer of the International ORT. N. Y. Times, June 26, 1938.

For the first time in U. S. history citizens feared their national New Deal administration, commonly called "The Jew Deal."

The policy of Jewish-owned and Jewish advertising controlled publications follow the same "line."

"The Ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism."—London Jewish Chronicle. Apr. 4, 1919. "It was a Jew. Leon Trotsky, who led the Red Army which saved the Communist Cause in Russia." — From "How Odd Of God" by Rabbi Lewis Browne. In his 1918 book "Jews In Russia." Victor Marsden, London Correspondent in Russia, said of 545 Bolshevist officials 477 were Jews. "Bolshevisim is organized and controlled by Jews."—Nethetlands Minister to Russia, Sept. 6, 1918, reproduced in British Govt. White Paper on Russia in 1919. "What Jewish Idealism so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind are tending to promote in OTHER COUNTRIES."—American Hebrew, Sep. 10, 1920.

Communist revolutionaries were led in Hungary and Spain by the Jew Bela Kuhn; and by the Jew Socialist Leon Blum in France, in Rumania by Jewish Anna Pauker.

"The underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy of Justice Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court."—N.Y. Times, June 26, 1934. "More than any one person Felix Frankfurter is the Legal Mastermind of the New Deal."—From "The New Dealers" by Simon & Schuster, "The due process clauses ought to go" out of the Constitution—From 1938-9 book "Law & Politics of Felix Frankfurter, now Justice of Supreme Court. Those clauses constitute the cornerstone of American liberty. "The Roosevelt Administration has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration in American history."—Brooklyn Jewish Examiner, Oct. 20, 1933, refetring to Bernard M. Baruch as "Unofficial President." The World Almanac 1934-44 refers to Franklin D. Roosevelt as a descendant of the Roosevelt-Samuels family of Holland. "The man behind the re-packing of the U. S. Supreme Court was Samuel I. Rosenman, close friend of the President."—National Columnist Paul Mallon. Feb. 7, 1937. "The Social Justice

The CIO Political Action Committee, successor of the dissolved Communist Party in the U. S., is Communist led. according to the Mar. 29, 1944, report of the Congressional Committee.

The "Daily Worker" is the official organ of the Communist Party in the U. S. The N. Y. Morning Fresheit is the largest Communist daily in the U. S.

Cummunism is anti-Christ, being atheustic.

Committee of the Rabbinical Assembly endorses the President's plan for reorganization of the Supreme Court, and favors the general tendency of recently adopted socialist legislation, in particular the scope of the Tennessee Valley Authority."—N. Y. Jewish Day, May 11, 1937.

Four hundred of the names of CIO Political Action Committee key-men are Jewish. Sidney Hillman, Russian-born Jew, was chairman.

The incorporators of the "Daily Worker" were all Jews, and the editor of the Freiheit is a Jew.

Jewry is anti-Christ. "Fundamentally, Judiasm is anti-Christian."—London Jewish World, Mar. 15, 1923. "By the very fact of denying the divinity of Christ. Jews place themselves as enemies of the social order since this order is based on Christianity."—From "Anti-Semitism" by Jewish Author Bernard Lazare. "We challenge the present social system."—Resolution of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, N. Y. Times, Sep. 13. 1936. The United States was Christian-established. See Constitution attestation and U. S. Supreme Court decisions.

"ANTI-SEMITISM" ANALYZED

Based on foreknowledge that he has been substantially qualified to answer by a twenty-year intensive study of "Anti-Semitism," its origins and propaganda, this writer has been requested to publicize in questionnaire form his findings on the subject. This has been done in an analysis below for congressmen:

What is "Anti-Semitism"?

A publicity "smear" word.

Does "anti" imply antagonism to the Arab, Syrian, Egyptian members of

No, only to lews.

Then the term is misleading?

It is, intentionally so.

Could it be called deceitful?

It is just that.

What is the object?

To conceal Jewish activities unfavorable to non-Jews.

Is it employed only by Jews?

Yes!

Did ancient Palestine Jews use the appellation?

No more than do present-day Arabs, who are of the Semite race. How can a Semite logically be called "anti-Semitic?"

Then "Anri-Semitic" was not a Christian Bible term?

I found no record of such a thing. Non-Jews were often referred to as "Gentiles," or non-believers in Jewish faith.

Do present-day Jews refer to their critics by terms other than "Anti-Semitic"

Yes, "members of the Lunatic Fringe," "Nazis," "Fascists," "Red Baiters."

But the labels you refer to are Communistic.

They are, many Jews are confessed members of the "Communist Internationale."

Isn't International Communism anti-nationalist?

Yes, so are "International Jews" of today. They refuse to assimilate into the nations wherein they live.

Then "Anti-Semitic" may properly be termed "Patriotic"?

National Patriotism is automatically "Anti-Semitic" as the latter word is today used.

Then why do some Gentile commentators refer to "the virus of Anti-Semitism?"

Because they are misled.

Where did present-day Communism originates

In Russia among Jews.

Did Jews have anything to do with the Bolshevist Revolution that established the Communist Soviets?

The Revolutionary Committee which directed the uprising that overthrew the Czar Autocracy was composed of 545, of which 447 were Jews.

Where did "Anti Semitism" first appear politically?

When Czarist Russia made effective 1882 May Laws ghettoing Jews because they would not assimilate.

Why does "International Jewry" now call Communist Russia "Anti-

Semitic"?

Apparently because so-called "Zionist Jews" of the Bolshevist Revolution refused to assimilate.

Then the Communist High Command is "purging" the "Zionist Jews" because they refused to be assimilated into the Communist State— thereby constituting a danger to safety?

Apparently so.

Where did Zionism originate?

Among the Eastern Russia Jews.

Are there many Zionist Jews?

The American Jewish Congress history book "Unity In Dispersion" indicates that present day "western" World Jewry is a 95% majority. A minority of about one million "Sephardim" is located mostly in Moslem countries. Eastern Europe Jews have called themselves Ashkenazim without giving the name's genesis. They speak Yiddish, not Hebrew. They are contemptuous of Sephardim Jews. Zionist Past President Julian Mack says 98% of American Jews are Zionists.

What does "Ashkenazim" indicate?

It describes descendants of an East European kingdom called "Khazars," who were mass-converted to Judaism about 750 A.D., by Dispersed emigrants from Palestine.

Then Zionists do not belong to the Semite races of the Middle East?

Both Jewish and Christian authorities say they belong to the Asiatic Mongolian race which settled in the Caucasus, home of the Khazars.

Then Zionists apparently have no legitimate racial claim to a "home in Palestine" where they recently established the political state of "Israel"?

It is so held by H. G. Wells in his "Outline Of History."

When did Communism appear on the European political field?

In the early part of the Nineteenth Century. It apparently stemmed from "The Illuminatti," a band of ruthless men who organized in 1798 with the declared intent of destroying all governmentas and religions.

Have Khazar Jews displayed any special antagonism to the Christian

Keligion?

Some Christian quarters hold that Christianity is today being crucified on a cross of gold—repeating history that records the crucifixion of Individualism on the "Cross of Calvary" twenty centuries ago.

Doesn't all this evidence point straight to a world conspiracy against all nations?

Cold logic answers affirmatively.

Why is that fact suppressed?

Because the "terrible power of the purse" destroys free speech and free press, and promotes treason among politicians trapped in a gigantic web of deceit.

Out of more than twenty-five different "explanations" published regarding the "anti-Semitic" Russian "purge puzzle," many of them from Jewish sources as well as otherwise, not one has been lucid as to the implications of the momentous developments of 1953.

"KEY" SUCCESSORS TO STALIN

MALENKOV, George; Premier; ancestry Asiatic; born in Eastern Russia; "right-hand man" of Kaganowitch in past Stalin purges. Acted as "political" commissar in Red Army.

BERIA, Lavrenti; former name Berijev; Interior Minister with control of Soviet Secret Police; ancestry Jew; protege of Kaganowitch; in Beria lies the most important part of the Soviet machine according to Eugene Lyons, Jewish author who had a two-hour interview with Stalin in the Thirties. In the San Francisco Examiner Lyons said the same old gang still controls the Kremlin. (3-13-53) ("Liquidated" later.)

KAGANOWITCH, Lazarus; Vice-Premier; ancestry Jew; relatives key-posted throughout Soviet; sister was Stalin's wife; Stalin's daughter recently married a Kaganowitch; Kaganowitch is the ablest man in the Politburo according to "Life" magazine 7-14-41. "Lazarus Kaganowitch is a great man. He will one day rule over the country of the Czars. His sister is Stalin's wife." From "The Moment," Russian Jew publication 11-13-34.

MOLOTOV, V. M., Foreign Minister; name changed from Scryabin; wife Jewess; born Eastern Russia, son of salesman; the name "Molotov" means "hammer" like pseudonym "Marcus Eli Ravage," author of "Real Case Against The Jews." Molotov's "assistant" is the Jew Jacob Malik.

VISHINSKY, Andrei; UN Soviet Delegate; "Jewish."

All of above were from the Eastern European Khazar-Jew territory.

IS MALENKOF "Jew-surrounded?"

In January, 1953, Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver told a Philadelphia Jewish audience to suspend judgment as to whether or not Russian Jew-purges were genuine "anti-Semitic" orders from the Kremlin. Did he have foreknowledge?

The conclusion is inescapable. The Kremlin Jew-domination is NOT genuinely "Anti-Semitic." Which condition recalls the Communist protocol to the effect that when safety calls for such action programs against Jews are instigated by the High Command "for the management of our lesser brethren" "Anti-Semitism" is diversive strategy to mask ulterior subversions.

"Gothic Ripples," of March 12, 1953, Editor Arnold Leese, Guildford, Surrey, England, contains the important information that the new edition of the Soviet Encyclopedia proves that "there is no 'anti-Semitism' in official Russia. Volume 15—per London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. 13, 1953—reports what the Soviets have always maintained—that 'The Jewish Problem does not exist in the Soviet Union, where taday Jews find the doors apen to all professions.' Whether of the Right or Left, those who speak of recent events behind the Iron Curtain as evidence of 'anti-Semitism' in the Soviets are either utterly misled by imperfect knowledge or are deliberately using the crisis to gain sympathy for the Jews. By 'imperfect knowledge' we mean ignorance of the basic fact that Bolshevism (Communism) is Jewish. What is happening in Russia may have a tremendous repercussion on world politics, for at last Bolshevik Jew fights Bolshevik Jew. This gives scope for a split Russia. If that happens the end of the cold war would be in sight."

A Tel Aviv cable to the San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 13, 1953, reported unofficial Jewish sources "expressed satisfaction that the incident (bombing) would definitely place Israel in the camp of western nations and MAKE HER DESERVING OF MORE U. S. ECONOMIC HELP AND ARMS TO STRENGTHEN HER POSITION AGAINST HOSTILE ARABS."

Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler of Brooklyn said on Feb. 15, 1953, in the N. Y. Times that the Israel bombing incident opened opportunity for America to increase its financial and military aid "to the Jewish State."

TREASON TO THE U.S.

The pattern of the 'purge' strategy of the Jewish High Command was inadvertently exposed in a N.Y. item published Jan. 24, 1953, in the San Francisco Examiner, which said: 'The American Jewish Committee charged today that Russia's vast anti-Semitic purge has driven into slave labor camps 800,000 Jews.'

The further statement was made that an American Jewish Committee's "survey," based on "contacts with underground sources, monitoring of Communist broadcasts, interviews with refugees, and State Department reports" of 1952, shows that the goal of the purges is the same as Hitler's, viz.:

• (1) To Mobilize anti-American hatred all over the world.
• (2) To cause "Anti-Semitic groups to isolate the U. S." from Allies during a Stalin "hot" war against the free world.
• (3) It gives the information that purges of Jews would be led by Jews in many cases so that the Communists can say there is no discrimination.

The implied intent of the involved Jewish policy forecasts a sinister assault on U. S. publishers exposing the Jewish anti-Americanism of the New Deal, as indicated by the hint that "anti-Semitic groups" would be a Russian Fifth Column in the U. S. to isolate and weaken the latter and promote the success of a Soviet "shooting war."

The focus is that said "anti-Semitic" publishers would be guilty of treason to the U. S. in that they, by being "anti-Semitic," help the Communists.

Such invalidated "guilt by mere association" was precisely the completely refuted accusation of the Communistic Roosevelt prosecution in the 1944 dismissed mass-case, in which defendants were branded as co-conspirators with Hitler because they also were "anti-Semitic," like the Nazis.

Former Zionist Organization President Solomon Goldman said in the N. Y. Times of July 1, 1940: "He who is an anti-Semite is a Hitlerite." So you there have the Jewish inspiration of the foregoing direct from "the horse's mouth."

Doesn't blundering false Jewish Leadership EVER learn? As shown in the two Edmondson cases cited in this Petition, Jews are evidently again "allowing their emotion" to guide them to defeat, a reluctant published confession from Jewish Chief Counsel Hays of the American Civil Liberties Union, following the enforced backdowns in said cases.

The typical alibi prediction in the final sentence of the above Examiner dispatch that "MANY Jews" will lead the "Jew purges," carries the implication that many Jews are Communists, which has hitherto been denied by the "conservative" American Jewish Committee, although "radical" American Jewish Congress members have admitted it in writing.

The "survey" sources of information listed by the American Jewish Committee are obviously pro-Jewish, and as Jews will analyze and interpret such prejudiced data and propagandize it through advertising-controlled publications in the U. S., the general public can not recognize and isolate the bias.

"National chauvinism is an extreme form of racial chauvinism. Hence, Anti-Semitism is dangerous to the toiler. Therefore Communists, as internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable sworn enemies of anti-Semitism, which is severely suppressed in the USSR as profoundly inimical to the Soviet Union. Anti-Semites are punished according to the laws of the USSR by death."

The foregoing is a Stalin interview published Nov. 26, 1937, by The N. Y. Morning Freiheit, largest Communist daily in the U. S., printed in Yiddish, purporting to be FUNDAMENTAL Soviet doctrine.

It seems that the following question answers itself: Would the Rosenbergs convicted of treason to the U. S. for sending our atom secrets to the Kremlin Communist Leadership have taken such action if Communism were actually 'anti-Semitic' and against all Jews? It is noteworthy that at the time of the Rosenberg clemency plea to the White House, the latter was picketed by Daily Worker Communist delegations.

Clemency was officially denied the Rosenbergs when, on Feb. 11, 1953, in a powerful elementary-justice patriotic-condemnation, President Eisenhower refused to intervene. By which positive concrete action he definitely put American interests before Jewish demands. A politically-minded President would have granted elemency.

Will U. S. Communistic Zionist sources now call the President "Anti-Semitic" because his action coincides with the Communist reported "anti-Semitic" purge of Jews who confessed treason guilt to the Russian Government; and that therefore Mr. Eisenhower is a Communist following the anti-American "Soviet Line"; that, moreover, because of such "enemy collaboration," he is a traitor to the Republic of the U. S.; and that, furthermore, he should undergo an alienist test to see whether or not he belongs to "The Lunatic Fringe?"

I sincerely hope that President Eisenhower may find time to read and digest this Petition (copy of which has been sent to him) because the documentary record should prevent him from becoming tangled in the most gigantic labyrinth spider-web of deceit ever evolved.

A CRAZY RECORD

Rabbi Schmelka Margoshes, Editor of the N. Y. Jewish Day wrote Sep. 12, 1936. "We are a people nobody knows!"

Basil M. Henriques, a distinguished British Jew, admitted: "We are a peculiar people, and a peculiar people we shall remain!"—Zionist Record of South Africa, Apr. 29, 1939.

Opposing assimilation, Rabbi S. S. Wise of N. Y., Theodor Herzl, Austrian Founder of Zionism, and Chief Rabbi Herzl of England, declared "we are a people."

In the Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. IX, under "Nervous Diseases" this appears: "Physicians of large experience among Jews have stated that most of them are neurasthenic and hysterical."

"As to dementia, it has been established in public and private clinics that the percentage of Jews is three times greater than Christians."—From "Jews and Judaism of Today" (1925), as published by "The Key To The Mystery."

Dr. Alexander Pilcz, world famous psychiatrist of Vienna, in "Wiener Klinsche Rundschau" (1910) Page 888, made this statement: "Cases where acute psychoses lead to idiocy and lunacy are of particular frequency with the Jews." (From the Key to The Mystery).

When attacking "anti-Semites" Jewish writers concentrate on the bromidic smears "Lunatic Fringe," "Crackpot," "Filthy Jew-Bajters," "Nazi-Fascist," calling for insanity tests.

When this writer was summoned to appear before N. Y. Jewish Mayor LaGuardia in the Jewish Religion group libel case, he was told that an alienist would be on hand to "give him the paranoic works."

The same smear was proposed by Jewish publications for "anti-Semitic" defendants in the notorious mass-conspiracy case later in Washington.

(Incidentally, Robert Edward Edmondson is ready at any time to submit to a genuine sanity test by any reputable non-Jew alienist—after he has read this document.)

Now, in the Communist purge-trial of several years ago in Moscow, a large number of Jews vociferously confessed gross treason guilt to the Soviet.

Precisely the same thing occurred in Prague at the 1952 trial of Jewish Communists, where children were reported in the press as gleefully accusing their parents of treason.

A Jewish psychiatrist on January 16, 1953, delivered a lecture on "Mass Paranoia" before a California Medical Society, according to reproduction by the Peninsula Herald of Monterey, Calif., the next day, from which the following extract is taken:

"The major symptoms are a pre-occupation with suspicion, delusions of persecution, conspiratorial feelings; irrational accusations. In the mass, this becomes a persecution of minorities."

"... Our race has given the world a new prophet. He has two faces and bears two names. On the one side his name is Rothschild (Red Flag), leader of capitalists; on the other Karl Marx (Communist).—Jewish Editor Blumental in "Judisk Tidskrift," Sweden, 1929, Issue No. 57.

"No other religion in the world has offered a spectacle as contradictory, as malicious as the Jewish prayer Kol Nidre used during Yom Kippur . . . Jewish history has been tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the nations which have suffered them. Our major vice of old and of today is parasitism."—From "Jews Must Live," by Jewish Author Samuel Roth.

WORLDWIDE DESTROYERS

Jewish Author Samuel in "You Gentiles" says "Jews are destroyers, even of those instruments of destruction to which they turn for relief."

That sounds "cockeyed," but "let's look at the record."

JEWS "TURNED" TO RUSSIA and established Bolshevist Communism. Refusing to assimilate, do they now seek "to destroy" with an "Anti-Semitic" boomerang because they failed to get "relief?"

Explaining "Anti-Semitic" purging was due to "Russian Jews' refusal to become completely absorbed into the Communist State," Chancellor Simon Greenberg of the Jewish Theological Seminary of New York (quoted in the San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 19, 1952) added that the Soviets hold International Judaism to be treason. As safety of The Republic requires assimilation into a single American organism, should the U. S. also regard such anti-assimilation attitude as treason? Maybe the answer is in the American electoral repudiation of the "Jew" Deal last November.

And as Dr. Greenberg claims that the "seeds of Anti-Semitism" were in the 1917 Bolshevist Revolution, would it be impertinent to ask whether or not the intent thereby indicated unmasked a pre-conceived plot to dominate Russia?

A Palestine special to the N. Y. Times of Feb. 14, 1953, quotes Israel's Foreign Minister Sharett as saying the Soviet rupture of diplomatic relations was an aftempt to destroy "the sense of unity" among Jews longing for Zion. He admitted that the allegiance which Jews of the world have for the State of Israel "cuts right across Soviet conceptions."

JEWS "TURNED TO" GERMANY "for relief." Later, these "Khazar converts to Judaism," refusing to assimilate, and frustrated from complete domination, betrayed that country to destruction by bringing a World War on Germany, for becoming militantly "anti-Semitic?"

JEWS "TURNED TO" THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC "for relief" as refugees; but, refusing assimilation, they moved to destroy its form of government with their socialistic New Deal.

"WELCOMED IN, BOOTED OUT"

In the August, 1941, Atlantic Monthly, James Marshall, N. Y. prominent Jewish lawyer, admitted: "In every century the Jew has been welcomed into and booted out of some land. . . . It would be idle to deny that Anti-Semitism exists in America, or that it is loose dynamite."

Judging by its many failures Jewish leadership never learns, and obviously repudiates the ancient wisdom that to know the future man must be largely guided by past error.

Doesn't the Jewish anti-assimilationist policy constitute—

• (1) Alien enemy invasion, with hostile intent toward existing forms of national organisms, whose safety, peace and welfare depend on complete absorption of and disappearance into their culture of all ideologies?
• (2) Also indicate acquisition of American citizenship in such a manner as to supply de facto prima facie evidence of false pretenses amply adequate to justify prompt de-naturalization, disfranchisement and deportation of those who refuse to sink their peculiar antagonistic identities into genuine undivided allegiance to Americanism?

Existing laws are daily being invoked to de-naturalize citizens who obtained citizenship by making false statements in their application oaths.

That the inherent anti-assimilation policy of Jewry is a specific danger to the peace and safety of The Republe, is not susceptible to challenge.

To find the truth amid all this profound chaos the trained observer well-informed as to the Jewish Problem has little difficulty to trace the trail of the Jewish dream of supreme power, starting with analysis of the conception and perspective opened by the elucidations given below by highest authorities.

Once that commanding-view position is fortified by comprehensive know-ledge of the past, the "Jewish Line," at times hidden with bi-laterals and diversive movements, planned or accidental, the analyst is never confused more than temporarily, by incidental screens such as racial "Anti-Semitism," Zionist Communism, Socialism, Marxism, phoney Liberalism, Internationalist, Paternal and other subversive auxiliaries, which are TOOLS dictated by the end-product aim of complete dominion.

WORLD DOMINION DREAM GENESIS

To get real light on the Russian purges it is vital to consult origins, and in "Secret Societies" by Nesta H. Webster, famous British author, is found the following quotation:

"The conception of Jews as Chosen People who must eventually rule the world, forms the basis of Rabbinical Judaism and the Jewish Religion now takes its stand on the TALMUD AND NOT THE BIBLE."

Mrs. Webster adds that it is in the Jewish "Cabala . . . that the dream of world dominion recurs with great persistence; the Zohar explaining that 'The Feast of the Tabernacles' is the period when they triumph over other peoples of the world. The hope of world dominion is not an idea attributed to Jews by 'anti-Semites;' but a very real and essential part of their traditions. Let us not forget that Rabbinical Judaism is the declared implacable enemy of Christianity . . . Jews find in promoters of class-warfare their most valuable allies."

An eminent Biblical theologian, Rev. Denis Fahey, in his "Mystical Body of Christ," says the Talmud exposes the "terrible Jewish pride" in the corruption of "the Chosen People Mission" down into materialism, adding that from their condemnation by Jesus, Palestine "Jews ceased to be the Chosen People. As Jewish power in the material order grows, they fall prey to Marxian Pantheism."

Going into the diplomatic field the reader will find "world power" confirming evidence also in the secular realm as plainly indicated by Netherland's Minister Oudenryk's code message from Russia to his government in Holland recommending immediate transmission to the British Government as an Empire with power to counter the threat. Oudendyk telegraphed from St. Petersburg in 1918 that, "Bolshevism is organized by Jews whose object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things"—which is in harmony with the "Illuminatti" program to destroy all national governments" with the "Fifth Column" of anti-assimilation.

Referring to the long-established anti-assimilation policy of International Jewry, Editor Morrison of the powerful Protestant publication The Christian Century, in its issues of April 29 and May 13, 1936, editorially makes this charge:

"A Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take 'pot luck' with humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot escape the SUSPICION that it is hoarding its treasures for a SELFISH PURPOSE."

That immediately poses these significant questions

Could said "suspicion" interpret that "selfish purpose" as "The Jewish COMMON PURPOSE" so often broadcast by B'nai B'rith publications—carrying the implication that "the common" objective of Jewry comprises the world dominion plot-pattern faithfully followed by the Jewish-Bolshevist over-powering of Russia, and in subsequent Communist subversions of national unities?

Will such "suspicion" also expose the underlying reason why Jews are "booted out of every country" where they were unsuspectingly welcomed, and because, failing to dominate, refusing assimilation, they have brought destruction as heretofore categorically indicated, executing it with the double-meaning diversive cry "Anti-Semitic" persecution, to delude the rest of the world?

From the "vantage point" gained through the reader's conviction as to the chief objective of world dominion, the fog of compounded confusion is pierced by the X-ray of that foreknowledge.

But it must first be recognized that diversive activities merely represent "tools" of accomplishment, such as Communism, which Jews themselves do not want as their "Way of Life;" for their goal is ultimately individual. But, in order to achieve it they temporarily sink themselves into organized regimentation, convinced that such organization implacably operated, is the only method whereby a small minority can finally acquire eventual individual power over the common enemy.

The widely propagandized paradox that the Jews cannot at the same time be the greatest capitalist assembly and the most numerous communistic collection is now being generally unmasked by eventualities. They in unison promote communization of Gentiles from above and below, in pursuit of a Jewish solidarity idealization of supreme power.

The close inspector of developments will be convinced that Jews are not omnipotent, and that the dream of universal power is certain to end in universal ruin should it be realized. But completely exposed, evil generally turns against itself because the forces it invoked go into destructive reactionary reverse.

Personal initiative is the worst enemy of the subverters because it is the soul of real progress.

A PROFOUND PROPHECY

Britain's foremost Jewish Socialist H. J. Laski, Chairman of the British Labor Party, who lectured in America for the Collectivist way of life," according to Benj. de Casseres in the July 31, 1945, San Francisco Examiner, made the following prophecy:

"If the experiment (Socialistic New Deal) for which Roosevelt is responsible were in any serious degree to break down, the first result of its breakdown, because of the association with it of a number of eminent American Jews, would be the outbreak in the United States of Anti-Semitism more profound than anything Anglo-Saxon civilization has so far known."—(Quoted from Page 3, of the London "Fascist" of January, 1935, under the heading "Sovietism By Stealth," with the statement that Prof. Laski had enunciated it at the "8th Living Newspaper Meeting" held at the Anglo-Palestinian Club on Dec. 2, 1934.)

These questions pose themselves:

Does the November 4, 1952, overwhelming national election repudiation of said New Deal constitute said "breakdown" and reveal that "profound anti-Semitism," considered in connection with the fact that most of the convicted defendants in the 1952-3 communist spy trials in American cities were Jews, contribute to such "anti-Semitism?"

In an anti-lynching bill debate in March, 1937, Congressman Eugene Cox of Georgia said to Congressman Dickstein of New York: "If you insist upon an inquiry you are speeding the day when patriots will have to defend Jews against mass-intolerance. Mark my words! That day is coming."—American Hebrew, Mar. 1937.

The New Deal was openly called "The Jew Deal" in various parts of eastern United States. If the reader entertains doubt as to its Jewish character he will no longer be skeptical after reading the summarizing below of authentic documents quoted in this record in extenso.

In the early Thirties it was broadcast that Bernard M. Baruch was known as "Unofficial President" in the absence of New Deal President Roosevelt; that Jewish U. S. Supreme Court Justice Brandeis was "Father of the New Deal;" that U. S. Supreme Court Justice Frankfurter was the "Legal Master-Mind" who reportedly guided the White House Supreme Court "packing" plan of the New Deal; that N. Y. Justice Samuel I. Rosenman, was "Roosevelt's Right Arm" and writer of his state documents: that the Jew Herbert Feis was "The Brains of the State Department;" that the Jew Lilienthal headed the "typically" Socialistic Tennesse Valley Authority; that James P. Warburg, son of the "Father of the Federal Reserve System" was a New Deal "braintruster;" that the Central Conference of American Rabbis called on Washington for "socialization of basic American enterprises;" that Prof. H. J. Laski and Israel Moses Sief were Roosevelt British Jew consultants; and last, but not least, that President Franklin D. Roosevelt himself admitted Jewish ancestry, which was moreover promulgated by a genealogy from the Washington Carnegie Institute. And that when FDR introduced Bernard M. Baruch to a White House visitor, saying that "Bernie" had monitored him for many years, Baruch added "And don't you think I made a good job of it?"

In the light of the foregoing and the up-to-date quotation below from London "Truth" of January 23, 1953, minds not closed will be completely convinced.

"TRUTH " TURNS ON SEARCHLIGHT

Referring to the "especially incongruous" Churchill-Eisenhower meetings in N. Y. City at the private residence of Bernard M. Baruch after the Presidential election, the London Weekly's writer, Douglas Reed, said:

"From such statements as he (Baruch) occasionally makes, he appears to be in global affairs AN INTERNATIONALIST, in domestic ones, A SOCIALIST.

"He has consistently recommended the REDUCTION OF NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY in the greater field, and the IMPOSING OF CONTROLS in the American domestic one.

"Thus he appears to be NOT A BELIEVER IN NATIONAL OR IN-DIVIDUAL LIBERTY, which is the root-principle of Conservative belief, but an OPPONENT thereof.

"He has sometimes gone very far in recommending a SUPRA-NATIONAL AUTHORITY, answerable to none, but EQUIPPED WITH A TERRIBLE SWIFT SWORD."

Although emanating from quarters possibly not completely informed, that summary, in my opinion, is the most penetrative scholarly and dramatic evaluation of "the Elder Statesman" ever published at home or abroad.

After careful review of the record herein regarding this Wall Street self-styled speculator, termed "Mystery Man" in politico-economic circles of the world capitals of Washington, New York and London, newsmen like the undersigned, with decades of experience in the world's greatest financial center of New York, have been overwhelmed by the dramatic spectacle presented of "one-man-power" of practically unbounded extent and degree—recalling Baruch's admission before a U.S. Congressional Committee following World War One, that during the great conflict he had more power than any man.

Which probably operated to acquire for him in newspaper publicity the bombasic titles of "Elder Statesman" and "Presidential Advisor," since he went to Paris with President Woodrow Wilson where the Versailles Treaty was effected and which is said to have been a root-cause of World War Two.

Evidently the "global" deductions referred to in "Truth," were dictated by Baruch's continuously strong support of "UN," with whose creation Jewry had much to do; their spokesmen having boasted in the past that they had "created" the previously dissolved League of Nations.

The "great persuasive power" of the Baruchian "suave personality" backed by huge wealth of baronial extent, created for him an enormous politico-economic influence, in recognition of which his name heads the "Honor Roll" of "Who's Who in American Jewry." (See Postscript on Page 284).

The "Truth" allusion to Baruch's INTERNATIONALISM, interpreting it as "anti-national," recalls a statement published in the Chicago Tribune in the Twenties, wherein he was credited with calling "National Pride (Patriotism) a lot of nonsense."

The late Pennsylvania Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, told the House that "every administration which had listened to Baruch's advice had sunk the nation "deeper and deeper into financial mire."

As to Baruch's origins, I have seen published statement by him saying that his father was a Polish Jew—which puts him in the Khazar "Eastern Russia Jew" category.

I would like to entertain the hope, in concluding this analysis, that the masterly "Truth" summation supplies reasons why Baruch has not—yet—been "appointed" as "Elder Statesman" of the "Eisenhower Administration."

ANTI-SEMITISM IN ILS BEFORE HITTER

The 1944 mass-case prosecution alleged that Edmondson "anti-Semitic" publicity was "Nazi propaganda; that there was no active or organized 'anti-Semitism' in the U.S. before Hitler came to power in 1933, so that American anti-Semitism' was therefore Nazi-inspired and projected."

Defendant Edmondson prepared in refutation a court exhibit containing the following:

Benjamin Franklin was against the Jews as shown in "Benjamin Franklin's Writings" by Smythe, in the N. Y. Public Library, wherein the following was written by Franklin to President Adams of the United States from France on Dec. 14, 1781:

"By this time I fancy your Excellency is satisfied in supposing that J. Neufville is as much a Jew as any in Ierusalem—since Jacob was not content with his percents but took the whole of his brother's (Esau's) birthright—and his posterity did the same by the Canaanites and cut their throats into the bargain. Which I do not think Neufville has the least inclination to do to us when he can get anything by our being alive."

That "anti-semitism" was 152 years before Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933.

We now come to an Adams sequel, for the extracts below are from "Henry Adams and his Friends," 1947, by Harold Dean Cater, Houghton Mifflin Co., publishers, Boston, Mass. (Henry Adams is a descendant of John Adams).

A letter to John Hay from London, Oct. 4, 1895, from Henry Adams says: "The Jew Question is really the most serious of our problems. The Christians secretly encourage the anti-Semitic movement."

Letter from same to same dated July 28, 1896: "Did you enjoy, as I did, that list of Jew names tailed after J. P. Morgan in the foreign exchange syndicate which has been formed to step in and try to save Morgan's stocks from going to nothing? How the deuce do the Jews manage to make this chaos stand on end. The whole carcass is rotten with worms—socialist worms, anarchist worms, Jew worms."

That was more than 35 years pre-Hitler,

"Organized Anti-Semitism in the U. S.," by Donald Strong, published in 1941 under the sponsorship of the "American Council on Public Affairs," after saying on Page 14 "The Jew is the perpetual alien," reports on Page 15 "Anti-Semitism in its political form first appeared in the U. S. at the end of the world war (1918). The high point was reached in 1920-22 (11 years pre-Hitler.) Political anti-Semitism had been well-rooted in German culture for HALF A CENTURY when the Nazis appeared on the scene."

On Dec. 17, 1862, more than 70 years pre-Hitler, U. S. General Grant issued an order barring Jewish traders from Union Army camps, because they "violated every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Dept." Could that have been "active anti-Semitism?"

The Henry Ford anti-Jewish literature in 1920-22 was so strongly documented, it created widespread active "anti-Semitism" throughout the United States long before the Nazis rose to power. (Recent developments include a confession that Ford's secretary—not Henry Ford—wrote the "apology" Jews claim to have forced from Ford.)

The case of Near vs. Minnesota, 283 U. S. Supreme Court 697 shows that "virulent Anti-Semitism" existed in the U. S. in 1927, six years before the Nazis came to power. The owner of "The Saturday Press" of Minneapolis, in his Nov. 19, 1927, issue, charged city officials with corruption, and said: "Practically every vendor of vile hooch, every owner of a moonshine still, every snake-faced gangster and embryonic yegg in the Twin Cities is a Jew."

"Concerning The Jews," article by Mark Twain in the 1900 edition of "The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg," reflects strong "Anti-Semitism" in the U. S. 33 years before Hitler came to power. Twain said: "The Jew is a money-getter;" he made it the end and aim of his life; he was at it in Rome; he has been at it ever since; his success has made the whole human race his enemy."—(33 years before Hitler.)

Rabbi Lee J. Levinger's 1930-1 book "The History of the Jews in the U. S." says:

"After the world war (1914-18) all this anti-Semitism was brought to America... Jews had been excluded from social clubs and fashionable resorts; Jewish businessmen were boycotted."

The book admits a "flood of Jews" came from Eastern Europe and Russia just after 1918—more than a decade before Hitler came to power in 1933.

Did this "flood" cause "anti-Semitism?" Let Zionist Founder Theodor Herzl answer from his 1936 book "The Jewish State," wherein he said "The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers." Many Jews lived in the U.S. in 1925, 8 years before Hitler became German Chancellor, viz: 3,500,000 of them.

On Oct. 17, 1944, principal Prosecution Witness Rauschning in answering cross examinations by mass-case defense counsel, admitted as follows at the mis-trial in Washington, D. C.:

"Is a person who is sincerely anti-Semitic a Nazi?"

"No. Anti-Semitism existed hundreds of years before Hitler."

"Without being a Nazi, do you stand with Americans who are against Communism?"

"Yes. A strong national spirit does not make an American patriot a Nazi."

(End of Court Exhibit.)

"ANTI-SEMITIC" ROOTS

"The Russian May, 1882 laws were the most conspicuous monument achieved by modern Anti-Semitism, which then set its mark on the international relationships of the powers. The modern Jew with his Yiddish culture and rapacious traditions should not be confused with Bibical Jews, who were mainly a pastoral people. The International Jew of modern times is the bastardized product of a bastardized past. He does not worship the Bible, but the Talmud; he does not speak Hebrew, but Yiddish. He is not descended from Israel. This is vividly illustrated by H. G. Wells in his 'Outline of History.' Therein it is stated that "the main part of the Jewry never was in Judea and had never come out of Judea." (From "Behind Communism, second 1952 edition, by Frank L. Britton.)

After the 1882 May Laws in Russia, "Anti-Semitism" was a term increasingly applied to Gentile criticisms or restrictions. These Jews adopted the slogan "No Assimilation." Communism, with its "common purpose" of world dominion, and Zionism with its Palestine State of Israel objective, were both rooted in Russia.

History reports that the "King" of the Khazars (of Eastern Russia) adopted for his mixed-Mongol people what Texas Methodist University Prof. John Beaty, author of an invaluable book "The Iron Curtain Over America," terms "a form of the Jewish Religion" about 741 A.D.—which government was destroyed and its territory confiscated by Slavs in the tenth century.

I am in full accord with the "purge" program advocated by Dr. Beaty, whom I never met, and of whom I had no knowledge during the 1933-1940 crusade. He says the later antagonism between Khazars and Slavs was "not racial, but ideological."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia reports "Khazar migration" to Russia, Poland and Europe. That Encyclopedia states that from earliest Russian times its Government worked for complete exclusion of Jews.

The genesis of the world conspiracy rests in rabbi manifestoes that "Jews are a people, one people," with the intimation in prominent Jewish circles that Jews comprise an "International People" whose center is now in the Palestine State of Israel, founded by Zionist Jews.

The world conspiracy picture reflects Communist beginnings in the seventeenth century with the so-called Illuminatti, whose grandiloquent objective was proclaimed as abolition of national European governments and destruction of Christian religious sects-which aim seems to have been inherited by Marxists.

To grasp the widely ramifying implications of the term "Anti-Semitic" it is necessary to learn the aspirations and strategies of the dominant Khazar Ashkenazi element of "International Jewry," a people constantly refusing to be assimilated. These people have apparently usurped the title "Chosen People of God," originally "vested" in the Semite Jews of Palestine, according to Biblical history.

Jewish Scientist Albert Einstein provided a KEY unlocking the mystery of "Anti-Semitism" when he proclaimed that "The Jew remains a Jew" even when he changes faith, name or position in life.

The term "Semite' is only legitimately applied to members of the "Semite Race"—Egyptians, Syrians, Arabs, aside from the Palestine Jew of old. Descendants of the anciently Judaized Khazars of eastern Russia, being of Mongolian Asiatic races, could not logically hold themselves rightfully entitled to "a home" in Palestine, having never been there as a people.

We now come to the core of a world plot for universal domination, not a racist, but evidently a theological affair, predominantly.

"LESE MAJESTE"

On the face of the evidence, having acquired a mass-delusion of exalted future grandeur impregnated by centuries of inbreeding, rabbi inculcation and strict kosher training, these Mongol Jews have apparently arrogated to themselves the theory that as "Chosen of God" none of them can do wrong; that their leadership is infallible, and they must therefore obey any order from the High Command.

And for Gentiles to critically analyze and unmask fantastic aims and thereby become "Anti-Semitic," is "lese majeste." Wouldn't that explain why their leadership, ignoring elementary justice, invariably rushes to the aid of the tribe everywhere, whether or not guilt has been confessed?

Rabbis and other leaders are continually opposing assimilation into national entities. Assimilation would not only eliminate rabbi monopolies; it would destroy the ideal of the "common purpose" dream of world domination. It is interesting to note that Protestant Christian leaders are beginning to use the terms "Illusion," "Myth" and "Nazi prototype" in alluding to this tribal state within a state and its anti-assimilation attitude.

In a 1942 issue the Chicago Jewish Sentinel declared that "World War Two is being fought for the fundamentals of Judaism." Not for Americanism! And when President Franklin D. Roosevelt publicly called for a descriptive title for said war, an "Australian Jewess" is reported to have cabled: "War For Survival." Of what, the "Jewish People"?

"ANTI-SEMITISM PHARISAISM?

Being neither a churchman nor a Biblical theologian, the writer makes no pretense of evaluating Fundamentalist or other strictly religious ethics, although modern developments seem to reflect a very close relationship. But truth instruments seek light. Note this:

"PHARISAISM BECAME TALMUDISM; Talmudism became modern Rabbinism . . . But throughout these changes in name . . . the spirit of the ancient Pharisee SURVIVES UNALTERED. When the Jew studies the Talmud he is accurately repeating arguments used in the Palestinean academies." See

The Pharisees; The Sociological Background of their Faith," 1946, The Jewish Publication Society of America; edited by Prof. Louis Finkelstein of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

In a 12-column scientific analysis indicating that Christ was not a Jew as Jews claim, appears the foregoing extract, published by "Common Sense," Anti-Communist newspaper of Union, N. J., February 1, 1953.

"Anti-Semitism means Pharisaism! The Christian who knows this will be more understanding of the hatred borne for Christ by modern Pharisees. Christ's excoriation of Pharisaism and all it stands for is unequalled for sheer liquid fire by any diatribe in history."—By Elizabeth Dilling in "The Defender" magazine, January 1953 issue.

I know Elizabeth Dilling personally. She is the famous author of the "Red Network," and stands high not only in Communist exposure but on the Christian Bible and the Jewish Talmud—which, incidentally says "The Modern Jew is the product of the Talmud." She is not alone in the thesis reached by years of exhaustive study, that The Dispersion blazes the trail down the centuries to today's Judaism as ancient Pharisaism carried into the Talmud (Jewish Bible). "declared complete 500 A. D."—which was in the period of the existence of the Kingdom of the Khazars who were mass-converted to Judaism.

"More than six centuries lie petrified in the Talmud," the very life-breath of Jews, their very soul, says H. Graetz in "History of the Jews," 1893. Those six centuries were followed by the Khazar conversion to Judaism. As interpreted by the Pharisees?

A Biblical student at this point would probably ask himself: Does this Khazar product "of the Talmud" mean that Khazars are "They of the Synagogue of Satan which say they are Jews but are not and do lie" repeatedly so alluded to in "Revelations?" And is this "The Beast of Destruction" which Biblical prophecy predicted would come "Out of the North"?

Acknowledging the accuracy of the fulfillment of prophesied general "tribulation" in today's Communism, this secular writer suggests that the mass-circumstantial evidence produced at least indicates WHO have been the champion trouble-makers down the ages.

Apparently being confronted with what seems to be a religious crisis of the first magnitude, I have been impelled merely to open perspectives and leave the resolving process in the hands of religious theologists more competent to interpret mysterious prophesying.

Yet the honest investigator cannot refrain from posing below an interrogation evolved by latest developments:

Having been frustrated in their objectives by Christ's Divine Denunciation, "unequaled for sheer liquid fire," did Pharisaic ancient leaders migrate from Palestine north to Eastern Russia's Caucasus, there find the Khazar descendants of Asia receptive and convert them to Judaism as they saw it and as delineated in the Talmud which they are reported as creating?

I wouldn't be qualified to judge that bit of theology, but I can envision the world-shaking secular possibilities should Christiandom broadcast an exposure of seemingly the greatest HOAX in history as to "BIBLICAL Jews."

And it would appear to the lay mind that it is about time for the Christian ministry to become militant Christian Soldiers, banishing "The fear of the Jews"

and boldly end "silence on the Jewish Problems," so despairingly deprecated by B. A. M. Shapiro ("By race a Jew, by Faith a Christian") who published in his "America's Great Menace" that Communism was "hatched in the Camp of Israel"

"There is a certain community who really are not Jews, whose ancestors were Asiatic people who became converts to Judaism during the earlier centuries of the Christian Era. Most of these so-called Jews have rejected the Jewish Faith, so that they are not now Jews in any sense of the word, neither by race nor religion."—From "Israel Britain" by Rutherford, 1939, referring to the Talmud.

But, you say, this is all fantastically impossible. How can so small a minority ever hope to gain domination over a world of more than two billion?

FANATICISM PRODUCES WONDERS

I can only repeat "how"?, and then point out that if such a small minority group is frenziedly elevated by a paranoic delusion of grandeur into the brain-storm atmosphere of Lese Majeste, the idea may be fantastic but enthroned emotional energy has achieved wonders thus far.

"World Jewry," by "mastering all the secrets that lay hid in money," and becoming "Lords of Money," have made themselves masters of the economic world, with more than ample gold-power to subvert widely in politics and elsewhere; and results appear to indicate that Jewry is well on its way to achieve "The Jewish Common Purpose" dream, working secretly through the "terrible power of the purse" and press, and openly by communizing unsuspecting non-Jews into slavery.

Vast destruction has been accomplished through two world wars apparently engineered by Jewish men who boast "We are at the bottom of nearly all your wars. We still dominate you through the mighty power of our spirit, ideas and PROPAGANDA."

What is to be concluded from the foregoing "confusion testimony?"

This: The Russian "puzzling Anti-Semitic" wails constitute nothing more or less than a smokescreen diversion used to conceal continuing subversions elsewhere—in promotion of "The Jewish Common Purpose" of world politico-economic control—precisely the "Communist Line" deceit-strategy in other fields.

Evidently in support of the new aggressive anti-Soviet policy of the Eisenhower Administration, below is extracted vital conclusions from a scholarly and convincing article by James Burnham in "This Week" section of the San Francisco Chronicle of Feb. 8, 1953:

After demonstrating that the Truman Acheson "containment" policy is a "formula for Soviet victory," Mr. Burnham unequivocally declares that "If the Communists merely succeed in consolidating what they have already conquered, then their complete world victory is certain. There remains only a limited time during which it will continue to be possible to move" against the Soviets.

I am fully in accord with that thesis. Is President Eisenhower? Intelligent counter-aggression in this respect could well develop into Liberation Step No. 2, following the Nov. 4, 1952, U. S. national election repudiation of the New Deal, which was Step No. 1.

"Anti-Semitism" was judicially declared not to be a crime under American law, in a unanimous decision by the New Jersey State Supreme Court on Dec. 5, 1941, reversing a lower court conviction, unconditionally holding unconstitutional the State Rafferty Act (which made a misdemeanor of any public utterance that tended to incite "hatred, abuse, violence or hostility against any group" regardless of race, color or creed), on the specific ground that it "violated . . . the guarantees of the Federal Constitution in the matter of freedom of speech."

"Now, over two-thirds of the Jewish People of the world live in America" Dr. Cecil Roth, Oxford history teacher and world Jewish Leader, told Kansas City Jews in Temple B'nai B'rith, Jehuda, Mar. 18, 1952, as reported in the Kansas City Star of Mar. 29, 1952.—From The Beacon Light Herald of Atascadera, Calif., of March, 1953. That Jewish estimate indicates that the total Jewish U. S. population is over 10,000,000 plus "cryptos." If the ancient Jewish custom of enumerating males only is still effective, the total could be

The \$64 question inevitably arises

Do we Americans want our laws, administration and judging done by members of a group of "peculiar people" who refuse to become genuine Americans by opposing assimilation, and who themselves are apparently shot through with paranoia inculcated by centuries of inbreeding and morbid dwelling on a fanciful delusion of grandeur as well as a self-induced defence-persecution by the Gentile world they label "the common enemy?"

GREATEST CRIME IN HISTORY

No collective crime in the annals of history parallels the Jewish subversion

of the American Republic. Never had there been so charitable a people!

With limitless sympathy and tolerance unexcelled, America welcomed to its hospitality from every land the oppressed, the despairing, the victims of tyranny. Opening wide the Gates of Freedom with unequalled opportunity and boundless wealth beyond, The Republic generously offered asylum.

And how did Jewish leadership requite? Jewish refugees—"wretched refuse from Europe's teeming shore" (Emma Lazarus on the Statue of Liberty) were moved in—and their New Deal took over.

Treacherously betraying American friendship benevolence, they, with incredible ingratitude, crowded us and our children out of the avenues of economic reward. With financial intimidation, they subverted to their own ends the channels of inter-communication; with seditionist intent, rejecting assimilation into this American organism, they usurped the administration of our political system with its equal rights for all and special privileges for none—planning socialist-communist revolution and the destruction of our republic-form of government.

Throughout Christian civilization, historical records show that Jews have been expelled from every great nation. Holding themselves superior and aloof, they have not only refused absorption into national organisms, but, in "fatuous effrontery," lusting for supreme power, they sought to tear down institutions and cultures they could not emulate, and substitute therefor the unworkable materialistic international ideology of leveling-down communism to the lowest possible common denominator.

And that once true AMERICAN metropolis of New York is now massleveled under the rule of "UN" Communists, Jews and gold, with Gentile minds growing cold and cramped and sordid, commerce losing its invigorating soul, with the arts sinking into blatant vulgarity and hypocrisy governing courtesy!

A MASS PURGE ESSENTIAL?

"American publicity channels MUST BE FREED FROM JEWISH AD-VFRTISING AND OTHER INTIMIDATION," declared Edmondson Bulletin to patriots on April 3, 1939; "political Jews MUST WITHDRAW from all key positions to permit restoration of American majority REPRESENTATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL Government in place of centralized "invisible" rule; MONOPOLIES of leadership of national and local political parties by Jewish key controls MUST BE ELIMINATED; Jewish Capital MUST RETIRE from its anti-social monopoly of screen, radio and other American NECESSITY ENTERPRISES; Jewish professors and teachers MUST BE PUT OUT OF institutions of learning; Jewish corruption of the Judiciary of America MUST BE OUSTED; Jewish promotion of Communistic propaganda against American liberties MUST CEASE; International Jewish financial domination of America's monetary system MUST BE DESTROYED; recognition of the Jewish Soviet Murder Government MUST BE RECALLED because of deliberately broken Communist propaganda pledges and slaughter of Christian millions.

"American Jewry has been indicted and arraigned for POLITICAL, ECON-OMIC, SOCIAL anti-American activities. It has been charged with placing Jewish interests OVER ALL in America, as a nation within a nation, with conducting a destructive economic program against American business; with financial promotion of revolutionary internationalist Communism and undermining the very American institutions which welcomed and sheltered it from oppression; with crowding American talent out of the Avenues of Opportunity through ruthless economic power; with ADOPTING and fulfilling in America the diabolical anti-Gentile super-government plans of the so-called Protocols of the Elders of Zion, whose AUTHORSHIP they deny without disproving the charge that Jews employ those plans.

"Nothing but a general 'smear' denial—which is NO ANSWER—has been entered against evidence, factual, documentary and circumstantial, including direct Jewish confessions of guilt.

"An American Jury IS GOING TO RENDER A VERDICT SOMEDAY! CAN it be other than 'Guilty'? And in view of the 'No answer,' with boastful collateral 'defi,' CAN the sentence of punishment be otherwise than PUNITIVE?

"The struggle converges on our country, which has been seized through secret controls of the Press, Politics and Economics. Here is the LAST STAND of the foe. All national doors are closed to mass immigration.

"If we fail, through FALSE FEAR and selfishness, to circumvent this diabolical plot, SUPREME SACRIFICES ARE INEVITABLE. America is now in "FULL CRISIS!" And I cannot impress it upon you too earnestly—"IT IS LATER THAN YOU THINK!"

Precisely six months later World War TWO began, into which greatest conflict, "being fought for the fundamentals of JUDAISM"—not Americanism—the Roosevelt Jew Dealers forced the United States in 1941.

THE JEWISH PROBLEM IN SOLUTION

What is a practical solution of the pressing World Jewish Problem, with simple Justice for Gentile and Jew? The following proposals have been made:

• (1) Kill the Jews-which is unthinkable.
• (2) STERILIZATION of Jews-which is out of the question.
• (3) DEPORTATION, on the ground that American citizenships have been acquired under false pretenses, which kind of expulsion has been operating under law in the U. S. effectively for sometime past. But we are considering

here the case of Jews who entered the U. S. citizenship not to become loyal citizens of The Republic, but who came with the aggressive hostile invasion ideology of an active anti-assimilation intent to destroy our form of government and dominate. Could such a contention be legally proved through overt acts committed by all individual Jews? Could there be a "clean sweep," which would be absolutely necessary to achieve real results? I doubt it!

• (4) STATE VOTING POWER DISCRIMINATION. Each state has power to discriminate and decide WHO shall vote in state and national elections. Even if successful, which is doubtful, the U. S. Supreme Court might rule that such a law violated the U. S. National Constitution. In any case, the terrible power of the purse' would still be exerted to subvert if Jews were allowed to remain as aliens.
• (5) POPULATION PERCENTAGE ALLOTMENT. Could efforts be successful in alloting "5%" of the total population to individual Jews in various professions and businesses, where activities now are conducted in many cases under Gentile names? What would prevent Jewish wealth from overcoming this and other similar discriminatory action?
• (6) NATIONAL DISFRANCHISEMENT, by Constitutional amendment, requiring Jewish deportation automatically. How could such a decree be enforced en masse and still be in harmony with individual justice; especially since this writer knows of numerous instances were some individual Jews have exhibited strenuous opposition to the New Deal treasonable leadership but who are fearful of "liquidation" if they do not obey the "High Command."
• (7) SEGREGATION of all Jews. How can crypto (secret) Jews be uncovered to effective action? If put in ghettos such restrictions would not avert subversion via the money channel, of which International Jewry is master. In the past Rothchild loans enslaved widely and are still in operation.

Made A WORLD POLITICAL affair with genuine international cooperation by Jew as well as Gentile, segregation could be effective. But experience has taught that the present Jewish High Command misleading Jewry, which has been rabbi-inculcated to regard that false leadership as infallible, would not give up without a world-shaking revolution, with Communism ready to take over in the chaos resulting.

Is there no other way out? I think there is; but it involves a definite change in Jewish leadership, and not through new prophets as some Christian clergy suggest; for, judging from the historic record, Hebrew prophets got nowhere even when they correctly foreshadowed later realized tribulations, including ordeals which present-day Jews are meeting in the Communist Soviet cold war "Anti-Semitic" purging.

"The Free World" now proposes to take the initiative away from Moscow by promoting aggressive counter-revolution among satellite states, the entrenched Iron Curtain first defense-line of Russia's Communist Government.

Why not strike first at the CAUSE of the Communism as represented by the overwhelming domination of Jews in the Bolshevist Revolution in 1917-18?

Who would be THE Leader to take the Jews out of such "captivity?"

Preliminary to that, however, and doing first things first, let's look back into contemporary history a little way and note the following from the late Theodor Herzl, apparently revered by Jewish masses throughout the world. What is the record of that "non-conformist rabbi" who passed away in 1904, but who, after death, was memorialized in 1929 in a symposium of prominent

Jewish names: and whose "Jewish State, an Attempt at a Modern Solution of the Jewish Question," written in 1895, was published in 1936 by the Central Office of the Zionist World Organization in London for Jewish circulation, with a foreword by Israel Cohen saying:

'One of his oldest friends to whom Herzl submitted the manuscript, returned it with deepest alarm; he feared Herzl was out of his mind, and begged him not to publish it. He also advised him to show the manuscript to Dr. Max Nordau, famous as a psychiatrist. The result was that Nordau not only vindicated the sanity of Herzl, but declared himself ready to assist him . . . Herzl's enthusiasm and courage grew. His ideas, while evoking sympathy in some quarters, provoked the bitterest opposition in others . . . He convened the First Zionist Congress in Basle in 1897.

Herzl's "Jewish State" contains this unprecedented Jewish "anti-Semitic" confession: "The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers. Where it does not exist, it is carried by Jews in their migrations. Our presence produces persecution. The Jewish Question is no more a social than a religious one. It is a national question which can only be solved by making it a political WORLD Question."

To this writer, the foregoing paragraph is the best brief description of "anti-Semitism" ever published.

Herzl elucidates with rare clarity the complex aspects of "Anti-Semitism." Said he in "The Jewish State":

"I believe I understand anti-Semitism. I consider it from a Jewish standpoint, without fear or hatred. I can see what elements there are in it of vulgar sport, of common trade, jealousy and inherited prejudice, of religious intolerance, of pretended self-defense. It sometimes takes these forms and others; but it is a world political question.

"It is useless for the Jews to be loyal patriots (of the nations in which they now live). Assimilation means not only in dress, habits, customs and language, but also comprises identity of feeling and manner. Such assimilation could only be effected by inter-marriage; but the need for mixed marriage would have to be felt by the majority; recognition by law would not suffice.

"The Jews are a BOURGEOIS PEOPLE. If the power they now possess creates indignation among anti-Semites, what outbreaks would not occur with an increase of power? Hence, the first step toward absorption will never be taken, because it would involve the subjection of the majority to a hitherto scorned minority possessing neither military nor administrative power of its own.

"Where Jews now feel comfortable, it will probably be violently disputed by them. The longer anti-Semitism lies in abeyance, the more fiercely will it break out.

"Because I have drawn this conclusion with complete indifference to everything but the quest of truth, I shall probably be opposed by Jews who are in easy circumstances. They can safely be ignored, for the concerns of the poor and oppressed are of greater importance than theirs. It is true that in countries where we live in perceptible numbers the positions of Jewish lawyers, doctors, teachers, employees, daily becomes intolerable. The nations in whose midst Jews live are all, either covertly or openly, anti-Semitic.

"We have attained pre-eminence in finance because mediaeval conditions (ghetto) drove us to it. Being on the stock exchange, we are exposed afresh to contempt. Educated Jews are now fast becoming socialists. We stand in the most exposed positions in the camps of socialists and capitalists.

"OUR TERRIBLE POWER OF THE PURSE"

"Modern anti-Semitism is not to be classed with the religious persecution of former times. The very impossibility of getting at the Jews embitters hatred of them. Anti-Semitism is bound to increase because the causes of its growth cannot be removed. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, sub-ordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; and when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse. The oppression we endure does not improve us, for we are not one whit better than ordinary people."

(No "Chosen People" racket in that.)

In the Herzl Memorial, Clemenceau, the great Frenchman, called Herzl a rare genius who fought for high destiny against his own people. But he won their post mortem crown of immortality!

Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver, Zionist leader, was selected to deliver the opening prayer at the January presidential inauguration. During the Communist picketing of the White House for Rosenberg clemency. Rabbi Silver added his clemency plea, without avail. He told Californians on arrival in San Francisco Feb. 23 (reported the San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 24, 1953), his version of the Soviet "anti-Semitism," saying it stemmed from political leanings of the State of Israel toward the western free world contingent; adding that he would like to see more American business investing in Israel's activities, which would benefit the Israeli. Which would seem also to indicate that even Jewish Communists in Russia could not forget their Jewish anti-assimilation tradition of "domination or downfall."

On Page 254 of the Herzl Memorial of 1929 appears an article by Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver entitled "Herzl and Jewish Messianism: Nationalism as a Means to a Greater Goal." In it Rabbi Silver says:

"The Jewish Messianic hope was born not in helplessness but in power. It sprang into being when the RACE awakened to a realization of the unique and amazing career which destiny had carved out for it . . . This dogma was INTERNATIONAL in character because Jewish Nationalism was then a fact, not a problem; a people can be international in outlook only when its own National Life is secure . . . It was missionary in spirit . . . It concerned Palestine only as the pou sto ("where we stand"), FROM WHICH VANTAGE POINT ISRAEL COULD MOVE THE WORLD!" Toward world domination?

Upon Rabbi Abba has apparently fallen the Jewish Leadership mantle of the late Rabbi Stephen Wise, President of the American Jewish Congress—with this difference: Rabbi Stephen's public platform appearance was characterized by belligerent bellows for "Mutual Tolerance;" with open war on. "Anti-Semitism;" punctuated by occasional wails "I have been betrayed!"—as when he was served with a subpoena by the defense in the Edmondson Jewish Religion group libel case. Not so Rabbi Abba, who enters the scene unobstrusively with rubber-sole-like subtlety. Which recalls the ancient warning: "The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart." (Psalm 15:21.)

I have no knowledge that individuals named herein who seem to be un-American, are not true to THEIR convictions; but as a loyal citizen I have no alternative but to do MY DUTY to The Republic by placing my beliefs before fellow-countrymen for their information and judgment.

Careful reading of this Herzl book of exceptionally independent thinking on a very high plane, the author of which won the Jewish accolade of "immortality" from tribal friend and foe, shows that while the Herzl Jewish Political State Plan first mentioned Palestine because of religious associations involved, he also referred to Argentine, Uganda and other locations, but said specifically: "WE SHALL TAKE WHAT IS GIVEN US." On Page 26 he adds: "Let sovereignty be granted to us over a portion of the globe large enough to satisfy the rightful requirements of a nation—the rest we will manage for ourselves."

"He then elaborates in detail his plan, which he proposes to have carried out by two Jewish agencies, one to do preparatory work, the other to see to "the realization of business interests of departing Jews" from the lands wherein they have been resident.

The plan envisions that "The departure of the Jews will necessarily be gradual, continuous, and cover many decades. The poorest will go first to cultivate the soil. . . . The Governments scourged by Anti-Semitism will be keenly interested in assisting us to obtain the sovereignty we want.

"The departure of Jews will involve no economic disturbances; in fact, the countries they abandon will revive to a new period of prosperity. There will be migration of Christian citizens into positions evacuated by Jews.

"Should the powers declare themselves willing to admit our sovereignty over a neutral piece of land, then the Jews will enter into negotiations for possession... We could offer possessors of the promised land enormous advantages, take upon ourselves part of the public debt, etc."

"The new Jewish State must be properly founded, with due regard for our future HONORABLE position in the world. Therefore every obligation in the old countries must be SCRUPULOUSI.Y FULFILLED. We shall not wait for reciprocity. We shall act purely for the sake of our own HONOR.

"Social dissatisfaction would be appeased during the years which the emigration of the Jews would occupy, and set it at rest during the whole transition period . . .

"I think a democratic monarchy and an aristocratic republic" said Herzl, "are the finest forms of a state, because in them the form of the state and the principle of government are opposed, and they thus preserve a true balance of power . . . A democracy without a sovereign's useful counterpoise is extreme in appreciation and condemnation . . . produces professional politicians. NATIONS ARE NOT FIT FOR UNLIMITED DEMOCRACY . . . The masses are more prone . . . to be swayed by vigorous ranting. It is impossible to formulate a wise international or internal policy in a popular assembly . . . Politics must shape in the upper strata and work downward."

James Madison, "Father of the U. S. Constitution" published: "A Democracy is incompatible with personal security and the right of private property."

HERZL AGAINST DEMOCRACY

Herzl not only appears to be in accord with Madison but categorically against the following by the Central Conference of American Rabbis printed in the N. Y. Times of Sep. 13, 1936: "There is only one way in which the American people can escape Fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing A THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY." Webster's International Dictionary describes "Social Democracy" as like Communism of Russia.

Amazingly, Herzl directly challenges, in the following striking words, the ballyhooed ideal of the U. S. National Conference of Jews and Christians to promote "more tolerance," already beyond the limit:

"UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD IS NOT EVEN A BEAUTIFUL

DREAM. ANTAGONISM IS ESSENTIAL TO MAN'S GREATEST EF-FORTS." The famous British Author, Nesta H. Webster, endorses the latter when she emphasizes that without "ANTI" the opposition loses that essential to victory, dynamic power, declaring that simply to be "pro" is not enough.

Herzl called for a 14-hour workday in the new state with two 7-hour shifts, to get maximum production without sweatshop methods.

Jews who might prefer assimilation and refuse to migrate, but who may try to "carry on" subversions, can easily be taken care of by a new press that will be free to expose wrong-doing in all quarters.

I leave it to any intelligent mind, Non-Jew or Jew, as to whether or not the foregoing principles enunciated by Herzl are sound as such.

Where would Jews go now? Millions are already in over-crowded Palestine-Israel (which is surrounded by other over populated and unproductive states) unable even to feed itself; and it is compelled to make continual financial aid appeals to the United States; also asking military assistance to protect it from surrounding enemies whose steadily expanding hostility is due to Jewish aggression in the establishment and promoting of "Israel."

If massive migration takes place to "Israel" from Russia under Communist "anti-Semitism" what can be done to avert starvation? RE-SHIPMENT TO THE LINITED STATES? No!

Where, then? TO MADAGASCAR, a fertile island as large as California, off the southeast coast of South Africa, not far from Palestine.

How could Madagascar be made available? France once offered it to Jews for colonization, and at a riduclously low price, considering Jewry's billions. And France would welcome the money to pay oppressive national debts.

The outstanding feature of this Herzl plan is its implied brand of "FALSE" with which it labels the present Jewish Leadership, which has materialistically perverted the British peace pledge of a religious "Homeland" for Jews "longing for a return to Zion."

Under the heading "False Leadership," on Aug. 1, 1934, Robert Edward Edmondson wrote the following open letter to Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, Zionist leader in New York:

Amazed by the astounding anti-American implications conveyed in your recent Presidential call for an American-Jewish Parliament, I am addressing you as below in plain language:

Your Parliamentary summons declares: "We are on the threshold of a battle for the preservation of our existence. The time has come when the Jews of America must acknowledge themselves and act as a people, not only where European Jewry is concerned, but where they themselves are concerned."

Why so preposterous a call to Jews to "battle for the preservation of existence" here in tolerant America, with their own leaders, Bernard M. Baruch, given, by the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner (Oct. 20, 1933), the high title of "Unofficial President" of the United States; Judge Samuel I. Rosenman "Founder and Head of the Braintrust;" Prof. Felix Frankfurter "Legal Master Mind of the New Deal."

And going abroad: Ought not Jewish Leadership be satisfied with having captured "All the Russians" with the Communist Council of 565, of which,

according to U. S. Congressional Records, 469 were Jews; to say nothing of dominating the British Regime by Socialistic "fronts;" and holding international banking control through the Rothschild "Hidden Hand"—to quote the "Red" Protocols, whose executed plans overcame Russia and whose prophecies were fulfilled in the New Deal legislation already enacted by an amazingly subservient Washington Congress?

Why this constant preachment of combat against racial prejudice and a summons for "economic re-orientation of Jews based on trends, opportunities and needs—to maintain unity"? Does this imply further welding of the Jews into "a nation within a nation"?

Americans are beginning to ask: Is this Jewish Parliament called for the purpose of staging another of those periodic wailing-walls notorious in history as "sounding-boards" for outcries of "persecution."

Before it is too late, might it not be wise for this leadership to sincerely direct the tremendous Jewish energy, talents, perseverance, determination and willingness to work, into patriotic American constructive channels, instead of nursing an increasingly dangerous antagonism that has come to be universally denounced and branded as Jewishness."

Robert Edward Edmondon

IEWISH LEADERSHIP AFTER DEAD SEA WEALTH

To unmask the proven fallacy of the "religious association" appeal for Palestine acquisition, propagandized throughout the world by false Jewish Leadership for "moving in and taking over," it is but necessary to "think materialistically" and learn that the Dead Sea mineral wealth of several trillion dollars was probably the real underlying profit motive of the gentlemen in the Middle East "pile."

And that is not all. Note the strong socialistic and communistic elements now in Israel, where many communities are reported living "in communism"; and then recall Herzl's ANTI-Democracy-Communism principles proposed for his new Jewish political state.

On Page 70 of his state outline he says:

"I incline toward the aristocratic republic, INDIVIDUAL ENTERPRISE MUST NEVER BE CHECKED," which approves the American individualism concept. "WE SHALL SCRUPULOUSLY RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL. Private property, which is the economic basis of independence, shall be developed freely. The people is the personal, land the impersonal groundwork of a state, and the personal basis is the more important of the two."

Herzl must have been reading American history when he wrote on Page 71, "Shall we end by having a theocracy? No! We shall keep our priests within the confines of their temples. THEY MUST NOT INTERFERE IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE STATE."

Memorial testimonials to Herzl from both opponents and proponents in Jewry contain the following:

"The laurels of Immortality" were wrested (by Herzl) in the hour of death from seeming failure."—Chaim Weismann, first President of the Jewish State in Palestine. He was not a pro-Herzl Zionist.

"The noblest soul in Judah is not dust," wrote Jewish Poet Israel Zangwill after Herzl's death, in a glowing poetic tribute.

"The entire Jewish people must mourn the loss of this lofty personality. Among his Jewish contemporaries not one approached him. His championing of justice, honor and freedom brought him public approval. The power behind him was moral. The Zionist idea existed before Herzl. To us East European Jews he was a brother."—Nahum Sokoloff, who said Jews created the League of Nations after a 25 year struggle.

"The stony soil, the lack of humus, the dearth of fauna and the scanty flora seemed to me insurmountable obstacles to any (Jewish) colonization of Palestine. Consideration of climate, physical nature and racial psychology resulted in a definitely negative conclusion in my mind. Like Zangwill, I preferred colonization on a large scale in Argentine, in Texas, or Uganda. Palestine meant nothing to the great financier de Hirsch, for it was impossible to grow grain there. But I, non-Zionist . . . pay homage to Zionist Leader Herzl (in a memorial address).—Ludwig Stein, German Professor of Philosophy.

"The announcement of Theodor Herzl's sudden death in 1904, in the throes of the Uganda plan, found English Zionists in a state of turmoil and disorganization. The Jewish Colonial Trust had been launched in 1899 as the financial instrument of the Zionist Organization."—Paul Goodman.

"'The return to Zion' must be preceded by the return to Judaism," said Herzl, from whose diaries the following features are taken:

He does not say Palestine or any other specific place-merely "over there."

"I want to do everything openly and clearly, within absolutely legal limits" Herzl told the Grand Duke of Baden.

Herzl quotes the Sultan of Turkey as saying regarding Palestine: "The Turkish Empire (in which then was Palestine) does not belong to me, but to the Turkish People. Let the Jews keep their billions."

"The Jews who are comfortable are my enemies. Thus I begin to have the right to be the greatest anti-Semite of all."—Herzl.

Describing his first visit to Palestine on an expedition "by command" of the Kaiser, Herzl wrote in his dairy: "Poverty, desolation and fearful heat." He quotes the Kaiser as saying the land "needs water, much water, above everything else, water!" (Scarce in Palestine).

On Dec. 29, 1899, Herzl wrote: "Yesterday I had a talk with Oscar Straus, American Ambassador to Turkey. He considers Palestine unattainable for us, as the Greek and Roman Catholic Church would not permit it."

In his "Jewish State," first written in 1895, (published in England 1936), Herzl, who died in 1904, said on Page 30: "Shall we choose Palestine or Argentina? WE SHALL TAKE WHAT IS GIVEN US, selected by Jewish public opinion."

In 1936 on February 7, the London Jewish Chronicle printed a letter from S. Landman, former Jewish Propaganda Agent of the British Government, saying: "The only way to induce the American President (Woodrow Wilson) to come into the World War (1914-18) was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine. The Zionists carried out their part and helped bring America into the war." A June 15, 1936, Associated Press cable from London reported: "The promise of a National HOME FOR JEWS in Palestine to gain WORLDWIDE JEWISH SUPPORT for the Allied Cause in the World War, was detailed to the House of Commons today by David Lloyd George, Premier, as follows: "We came to the conclusion that it was most vital to have the co-operation of the Jews throughout the world. I bear testimony to the fact that the Jews responded. They were helpful in America and even in Russia."

The 1936 Landman statement unmasked AN ACT OF WAR against "the best friend Jewry ever had" among the nations, according to James P. Warburg, a prominent New York Jewish banker, in a statement to Robert Edward Edmondson at a 1934 conference on Communism's dangers.

Under "Theodor Herzl" the Columbia University Encyclopedia records: "He was born in Budapest, 1860, Hungarian Jew, journalist and dramatist, founder of Modern Zionism, died in 1904, buried in Jerusalem.

The same publication under Zionism says it is a movement for re-constituting a Jewish Nation; that Herzl called the first World Zionist Congress at Basel in 1897. American Jews furnished most of the money for Zionist activities. The first issue to split Zionists was whether Palestine was essential to the Jewish State. Led by Israel Zangwill those in opposition withdrew from the organization. The British Government issued the Balfour Declaration (after 1916) promising to aid in establishing "a home" in Palestine for the Jewish People WITH THE PROVISO that the rights of non-Jewish communities would be respected. The Jewish State was proclaimed May 14, 1948. The World Jewish Congress was separated from the Israel Government.

Two decades after Herzl's death Jewish Leadership established the Jewish Political State of Israel in Palestine and immediately engaged in warlike activities against the Arabs in violation of the pact under which a "Jewish Homeland" was promised with the proviso that non-Jewish rights would be respected. The 1917 Jewish "Sell out of America," with repudiation of Arab rights, plus Holy Land assassinations and later bombing of the Russian Embassy, all make plain that the Palestine Political State of Israel was conceived in warlike treachery and established and maintained by war, cold or hot.

It is anciently written that he who lives by the sword dies by the sword. Is

that to be the fateful end of the political state in Palestine?

RUSSIAN-MOSLEM "PINCERS"

Herzl's Jewish opponents who could not accept his broad humanitarian ideals of Jew-Gentile benefit did not hesitate to exploit the strictly Jewish ideal of a 'Return to Jerusalem,' to promote their temporal objectives. Undoubtedly materialistic minds were lured by the dazzling prospect of world control under the aegis of the wealth of the Middle East and Jewish "toll-gate control" between the Orient and the Occident. The prospect of a "Return to Jerusalem" provided enormous emotional energy to the Palestine Plan, absent as to other sites for the Jewish Political State. But the materialistic objectives appear to have already been upset by the march of time, as well as the inadequacy of Palestine for practical colonization, with pressure from Russia in the nature of an "anti-Semitic" forced exodus.

With fertile Madagascar available, and Palestine proved fundamentally unfit for pioneering colonizing, with Jewry confronting another immeasurable world crisis, I do not believe Statesman Herzl, had he been living, would have repudiated his high principles by approving false leadership treachery to a friendly nation, or subsequent acts of war, to get even a trillion-dollar reward, which has in a very short time boomeranged back into a poisonous mess of pottage, with heavily overpopulated Israel facing an Armageddon squeeze between the powerful "anti-Semitic" closing pincers of an offended Soviet and a Moslem world "holy war" fanaticism increasing owing to Jewish aggression against Arabs, Egyptians and other Semite nations encircling it.

N. Y. Senator Herbert Lehman told a Washington Jewish audience raising bonds for Israel that the U. S. must give aid and support to that Palestine state to bring stability to the Middle East "and not refresh Arab hopes for a collapse of Israel." (N. Y. Times 3-8-53)

If complete confirmation is desired as to the points herein enumerated, read Pages 123-136 of "The Iron Curtain Over America" by Beaty, regarding the "rape" of Palestine, which I had not seen prior to writing the foregoing.

To this editor an aura of sincerity radiates from the entire Herzl basic proposition as to the cause and cure of "anti-Semitism" as related to HIS planned Jewish State—not the "Israel" now tottering about the Middle East, its founders drunk with materialistic illusions of unattainable world temporal dominion via Palestine riches.

This question was submitted by the writer to Gentile quarters: "Would you subscribe to the execution of Herzl's Emancipation of Gentile and Jew if guaranteed by mutual co-operation?" The invariable reply was a big "YES"! And it was based on the vital ground that a peaceful and very important mutual benefit would accrue, for it would solve the entire Jewish Problem after centuries of affliction for both sides.

Could it be that Statesman Herzl's brand of sound Zionism was unacceptable forty years later by the so-called intellectuals who insisted that the Jewish Political State should be located in Palestine—and won?

If Jews feel that there should be representation in Palestine of a "religious" home for Jewry, like that of other nations as such, with a colonizing headquarters for the Jewish Political State in nearby Madagascar, could there be any objections to that, either by the Herzlians or Gentiles? Such a development would provide an honorable move not only for Jewry as a whole, but also a practical segregation solution of the World Jewish Problem now menancing world peace.

Bearing directly on the matter under discussion, as this document was about to go to press the editor received the following up-to-date important warning to the Israeli delegation at the "UN" from "down under:"

"THE WESTERN WORLD WAS REPEATEDLY TOLD BY ZIONIST LEADERS THAT A JEWISH STATE IN PALESTINE WOULD SOLVE THE JEWISH PROBLEM"—

Published in the Tel Aviv INDEPENDENT daily "Haaretz," reprinted in the N. Y. Times of Feb. 25, 1953. The Palestine publication warned further that if that problem continues to be brought up in the "UN" by Israeli delegates "the western world may turn its back on Israel." The daily also stated that the absence of racial "chauvinism" in Soviet doctrine would make it easy for Russia to defeat the Israeli charge of genocide (mass RACIAL slaughter).

Are the Jewish "masses" beginning to wake up?

The impartial observer finds the Jewish State in Palestine has worsened the Jewish Problem instead of solving it.

A GREAT STATE DOCUMENT

A creative state document of immeasureable scope, dignity, power and promise, per se, the Herzl classic should go far toward convincing Jewry now, as well as the world, that the "Spirit is mightier than the sword," that the unmasked false gold god of materialism is a gigantic phoney. Money is not bestowed to exploit humanity, but to serve its spirituality.

Based upon the mass-documentation in this production "directly out of the horse's mouth," from the beginning to the end, frankly, I, as a loyal American would welcome into the American "hierarchy" such statesmen as Theodor Herzl appears to be in his protocol—a truly humanitarian Proclamation for Emancipation, simultaneously liberating from bondage the poor and the rich, the oppressed and the oppressor, the wage slave and his overseer.

Herzl selflessly and deliberately sacrificed himself before his time but was crowned with the "laurels of immortality."

Herzl laid his "all" on the altar of Jewish National Patriotism. Dare Jewry now do less in view of the overwhelming shadows of direful coming events, darkened by the Nemesis of Revenge?

Dare it continue to make supreme sacrifices to a Golden Calf Deity which has again and again and again shown that it cannot bestow in return 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness'?

Dare it again reject the clarion call to throw off the slavery chains of False Leadership whose "tissue paper resistance" power would fade like fog in the sunlike Courage of Determination?

And dare it ignore the Prophetic voice of Misery again rising at the Russian Wailing Wall?

I doubt it!

WHAT ANSWER WILL JEWRY MAKE?

Let me here report an episode occuring in my New York headquarters during the height of the patriotic crusade. Responding to urges that Jewry free itself by revolting against false leadership, a non-conformist Jew wailed:

"How CAN we free ourselves? WE CAN'T."

I ejaculated:

"Did your Forefather Moses say that 4,000 years ago? According to your biblical history, fired by the Spirit of Liberty, he told Pharaoh "where to get off"—and inspired by his heroic courage, an enslaved people under his leadership, marched out of oppression into the light of freedom and conquered nation after nation to colonize "The Promised Land."

"And did my forefathers say that? They did not. Inspired by that same ageless Spirit of Liberty, answering by Revolution the question: 'Is Life so dear or Peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains AND SLAVERY?'—They too, risking all they held dear, marched to victory with the battle-cry 'Give me Liberty or give me death!—and founded this magnificent Republic, benefactor of the oppressed, the greatest friend Jewry ever had, and the 1865 emancipator of its own slaves.

"If Jewry fails to liberate itself, then, again, in self-defense, America will have to promulgate a 'Second Declaration of Independence' and free the Republic from Jewry IN ANY WAY IT CAN!"

The RIGHT Answer by Jewry will mean Freedom, Peace, Progress for all concerned.

The Wrong Answer forecasts-

• (1) Eventual massive pressure forcing the American People to demand by acclamation drastic disfranchisement and merciless mass deportation. Or,
• (2) A POSSIBLE POGROM MASSACRE of proportions surpassing the combined total of massacres of recorded history, since THE ISSUE IS GEN-FRAL ENSLAVEMENT. Such would volcanically shake world foundations to the epicenter with simultaneous universal ruin. Are we all so completely mesmerized, consciously or unconsciously, by the cynical aphorism "Where Ignorance is Bliss 'tis Folly to be WISE?" as actually to COMMIT MASS SUICIDE?

Are we so hypnotized by the deadly Treason of Tolerance as to supinely submit to the fatal dictate of a BROTHERHOOD IDEAL which is the sole possession of Heaven, bowing down and worshiping A GIGANTIC HOAX like ostriches with heads buried in cowardice?

The Path to Spiritual and Material Liberation is not the rosy road envisioned by Idealism.

The Highway of Real Progress is built of competitive ANTAGONISMS, ordeals in which lie the dynamic forces promoting progress under the sane guidance of reason and logic—not the blind emotionalism of mad fanaticism!

And neither Jew nor Gentile can escape the consequence of dodging responsibilities, whether great or small.

"Can't" is "not in the American lexicon of life"! Our fearless "Men of '76' became "masters of their masters"—and their descendants of today threw off the slavish oppression of the "Jew Deal" Nov. 4, 1952: and are going to KEEP IT OFF henceforth, by DOING WHATEVER MAY BE NECESSARY to achieve complete freedom from tyranny at home and Communist enslavement abroad.

From the Public Relations Platform pou sto ("Where I Stand"), I solemnly hereby express my judgement at such "vantage point," that WISE Jews, in the light of current developments as heretofore outlined, who are not bereft of vision by materialism's dazzling "phosphorescence of corruption," will now come to "a full STOP" before the highway sign "To The Left;" listen, look and see the approaching Juggernaut of Evolution with its power to "grind exceeding small."

I believe they will accept and act upon the Shakespearian immortal warning that "There is a Tide in the affairs of men which, taken at flood, leads on to Fortune: Omitted, all the voyage of life is bound in shallows AND MISERY."

Great crises create new leadership!

It now seems "up to" the Jews to repudiate the faral Palestine protocol that Jewry could "MOVE THE WORLD," from Jerusalem; and then take "the RIGHT turn" away from false leadership—whereby they WILL gain power to "move the free world" and achieve deliverance and honorable peace, in a NEW Madagascar Jewish POLITICAL State—and still retain RELIGIOUS headquarters with other nations in the Holy City.

TESTIMONIALS

Received by Robert Edward Edmondson

The following unsolicited testimonial is a "free speech endorsement" received in July, 1946, on the photograph of a prominent defense attorney in the dismissed Washington seditious conspiracy case, who specialized in Constitution Law:

"To the Edmondsons, who have joined ranks with Socrates, Leight Hunt, Peacham, Defoe, Algernon Sidney, Lord Preston, William Penn, the Seven Bishops, the Dean of Asaph, Nicholas Bayard, Peter Zenger, Tom Paine and all the other 'Seditionists' who laid the Foundation for the First Amendment."

(Signed) WILLIAM J. POWERS, of the Chicago Bar.

Referring to the Jewish backdown-dismissal of the Edmondson Jewish Religion libel case, Adrien Arcand, of Canada, Leader of the National Unity Party, wrote "One single patriot has forced the wealthiest and most powerful organization in the world to draw back in the face of Truth . . . Defendant Edmondson emerges victor with a spotless sword from one of the greatest fights ever waged."

The following to Robert Edward Edmondson from the author of "The Truth About the Slump," A. N. Field of New Zealand:

"I would like to think that in some future age an enlightened Jewry would erect a monument to you in recognition of your powerful work TO SAVE THE JEWS FROM THEMSELVES. I think you are doing a most valuable and necessary work in behalf of your country and civilization generally. You are setting us all a splendid example in your undanted stand."

FRENCH VETERAN Urbain Gohier, for 45 years gallant fighter against the Jewish Juggernaut, wrote Edmondson in 1938: "You are a brave man, I admire you and wish you good luck. I have been fighting the same battle here for 45 years. I am now crushed and done for. They have made me an outlaw in my own land. The Government of France is now a ghetto. The whole of my nation is enslaved. Blum, acting for the Soviet, will bolshevize France very soon, and lead us to a deadly war against Germany for the sake of crazed Jewry. Hold on gallantly in the U. S. A., and save at least a clean place in this wretched world. Heartily yours,"

(Signed) URBAIN GOHIER.

"The biggest thing that has happened is the arrest of Robert Edward Edmondson in New York. Practically every worker in the field owes him a great deal because of the splendid research he has done, which has supplied us with ammunition to be used against the common enemy. Edmondson is fair and just to all, Jews included. If stating facts is libel, he is guilty, and should get the reward of public recognition from the people of the U. S. for loyal service in fearlessly exposing a conspiracy to enslave the Nation. Libeling is making false statements. This Edmondson has never done. He is the spearhead of this movement."—From The Beacon Light of Atascadero, Calif., 1936.

"You are doing the greatest service of any man in America. You are opening blind eyes, arousing millions from their fatal sleep of indifference and unconcern. Your work merits nationwide support. To be forewarned is to be forearmed."—From Dr. A. Z. Conrad, famous pastor for 31 years of New England's historical Park Street Church in Boston. Mass.

"Your own personal brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals in the seditious conspiracy case has just been received. I have read the entire brief carefully. In my opinion, it is a better piece of work than any lawyer could or would dare to produce. Not being a lawyer, you could plead ignorance of certain niceties and thereby lay a harder blow. I am sure the court will read your brief with great interest and greater good for defendants than any of the briefs filed by lawyers in the case." (Signed) M. J. St. George of the Chicago Bar, April 17, 1947.

(The high court upheld in November, 1947, the unconditional dismissal of the case by Chief Justice Laws of the District Court of the U.S.)

"In publishing the facts as set forth in your Roosevelt Supreme Court Council bulletin you have performed a wonderful service in the interest of maintaining the liberties of our people. May large power be yours in the great work you have undertaken." From Secretary G. A. Raymer of the Orange County Tax Council of Santa Ana, Calif., received July 25, 1936.

"Dear Mr. Edmondson: I do not recall that I have expressed adequate appreciation of the messages I have had from you. The fact that all the defendants in the sedition case had been convicted in the popular mind by a hostile press threw a tremendous responsibility on the defense. The program was not an easy one. Your wife (at the trial) was a tower of strength throughout." (Signed) E. HILTON JACKSON, Dean of Defense Attorneys in Washington Case, dated July 12, 1945.

"You are doing a great work in exposing the machinations of the enemy. In my young days I realized this menace, and saw that the Jewish instrument for world domination was the gold standard."—Arthur Kitson, England's greatest independent monetary authority (1936), who held that Jewish international bankers were deliberately creating inextinguishable debt."

"Looking in any direction, you can now see all the tragedies in reality of which you warned our Nation years ago. I hope some day a grateful Republic in rebirth will reward you with the high commendations and honors you deserve."—Gen. George Van Horn Moseley, former U. S. Army Deputy Chief of Staff, in a letter of Dec. 30, 1944.

"I have known Robert Edward Edmondson since 1934. He is a man of the highest integrity and honor. He is the best American I know. I advised and helped him in his work to save The Republic from Communism. What he did was characterized by high patriotism and courage. He is not guilty as charged in the seditions conspiracy here in Washington. His bail should be reduced."—Defendant's Counsel John S. Wise, Jr., whose address to the court as above was followed by reduction of bail from \$5000 to \$2000.

Captain H. H. Beamish of Great Britain, World Dean of the anti-Jew movement, wrote: "I want to congratulate you on your vigilante bulletins, which hit the nail on the head every time."—(1937)

Arnold S. Leese, London Editor, most reliable British publisher of subversions by Jewry, commenting on the unconditional dismissal of the group libel case in New York, May 10, 1938, printed this: "Edmondson has won one of the greatest victories in the world. We ask our American readers to assist him in every way."

The London Patriot weekly published the following June 15, 1939: "Robert Edward Edmondson's broadsheets are a mine of documented information on Jewish subversion activities."

"God Bless Your Work" wrote Father Denis Fahey, of Dublin, Ireland, author of "The Mystical Body of Christ." (in 1936)

"The Contemporary Jewish Record," published by the American Jewish Committee of New York, most powerful Kahal in the world, printed this on Page 50 of the July-August, 1939, issue:

"Robert Edward Edmondson, probably the most prolific anti-Semitic pamphleteer in the U. S., proudly displays a testimonial signed by leading anti-Semites of 22 countries" —which was as below:

"Your libel case of World Jewry versus yourself, which now has a world reputation, has been much discussed at this conference, with admiration expressed for the valiant fight you are putting up on behalf of civilization against the pernicious forces of Judah. We are sending this to show you we are thinking of you and admire your tenacity and great moral courage in this greatest of all fights against Jew domination of all we hold noble and sacred."

Below is a letter of June 16, 1939, from Dr. W. H. Anderson, General Secretary of the American Christian Alliance of N. Y. City, to Editor Charles Clayton Morrison of the Christian Century of Chicago:

"My understanding and belief is that much of Mr. Edmondson's material is made up of quotations from Jewish sources. I have become fairly well acquainted with him, and I have a very high opinion of his intelligence and implicit confidence in his integrity and sincerity. You are wholly 'wet' in your statement 'Only the plea of Jewish organizations induced Mayor LaGuardia to drop the N. Y. group libel case.' It got too hot to handle. Jewish organizations intervened as 'friends of the court' . . . and set out that the net result (of a trial) would react against the Jews. And that is a monumental understatment, for this case would have gone to the U. S. Supreme Court and set the countryside on fire. Under American law there is no such thing as racial libel."

The Jewish B'nai B'rith Messenger" of Feb. 21, 1936, published in Los Angeles, reported:

"We should not dismiss Robert Edward Edmondson as a crackpot—though there is no doubt he is just that. Scientifically, he is an obviously dangerous paranoiac with a terrific persecution complex; but of course nothing will be done about it, and he will die a more or less peaceful death after having done INCALCULABLE DAMAGE." (To Jewry?)

"No evidence whatever was produced by the prosecution at the Washington seditious conspiracy mass trial proving the charge against Robert Edward Edmondson of undermining the loyalty of the American military, as alleged in Indictment 73086; and after exhaustive investigation of his record, I, his attorney, am convinced that he is not only absolutely innocent of the charges made, but that his publications were motivated by the highest type of patriotism; that the so-called morale indictments against Defendant Edmondson were the outgrowth of a New York group libel case because he exposed attempts by Jewish Communists to substitute for our republic-form of government a communistic 'thoroughly socialized democracy'."—(Signed) Ethelbert B. Frey, Court-appointed counsel for Robert Edward Edmondson. Dec. 11, 1944, Washington, D. C.

"You have been a tower of strength in the sacred cause that you have so bravely espoused. I am proud to own you as a friend. I earnestly hope and pray that you may live to see the day when the diabolical incubus of Sovietized New Dealism may be removed from our Christian land."—Dated Oct. 11, 1946, from Rev. George 'A. Simons, who testified before the 1919 Overman Committee of the U. S. Senate as an "eye witness" in St. Petersburg, Russia, that of the Bolshevist Revolutionary Committee, under Zinovieff (Jewish name Apfelbaum), "out of 388 members only 16 happened to be real Russians—all of the rest were Jews with the exception of a negro, and 265 of those Jews came from the lower East Side of N. Y. City."

"Thank you for sending me leaflets regarding Communism. I agree with you entirely, and the country should be grateful to you for the very fine work you are doing."—C. E. Ingalls, Editor, The Corvallis Gazette-Times, Corvallis, Oregon, Sept. 7, 1938.

"I think you are doing a fine job in a most worthy cause. Congratulations on your excellent work."—Harry B. Haines, publisher Paterson Evening News, Patterson, N. J., August 12, 1935.

"Your non-profit patriotic agency has contributed powerfully to needed public awakening. I am convinced that the Republic is going to be saved, and I believe the seeds sowed by you will produce fruit a hundredfold. Please accept the enclosed check as an appreciation of the valuable material which you have sent me."—George E. Sullivan, well known Washington, D. C., lawyer, in letter of Dec. 27, 1940.

"I have read copy of your letter to Representative Dickstein with considerable interest. My reactions on the floor of the House have been in line with the issues raised by your letter. I am glad to know that someone of your understanding of existing conditions has the courage to bring the matter to the people of this country."—Compton I. White, member of Congress from Idaho, Jan. 2, 1935.

"I am happy to have your literature, and wish to express my admiration of your courage. I am in entire agreement with you as to the Jew Manace."—Sterling E. Edmunds, July 14, 1934, noted St. Louis Constitutional lawyer, author of famous publications on the subject.

"I sincerely regret I have been unable to meet you in person . . . You are one of the real Americans who believe first of all in the fundamental principles of this Government—and you have my profound respect."—Dr. J. Thorkelson, Member Congress from Montana, Oct. 10, 1940.

"It is my considered opinion that there was no evidence against you (in the Washington seditious conspiracy trial) which would in any way connect you with any 'world conspiracy' or with any conspiracy whatever . . . I am sure the finality of these proceedings will find you fully vindicated." Wm. A. Gallagher, Professor of Law, District of Columbia, (who attended the 1944 trial), under date of Dec. 17, 1944.

"This Americanism office is keenly interested in the background of Communism from every angle. The National Commander has requested that I ask you to send to this office, copies you may have available, of the literature referred to. These will very materially aid us in the work we are carrying on."—H. L. Chaillaux, Director National Americanism Committee of The American Legion, Feb. 6, 1935, Indianapolis, Ind.

In response to the following request from the N. Y. Public Library headquarters at 5th Ave. and 42nd Street, New York City, bulletins of the Edmondson Patriotic Agency have been sent to that institution:

"Will it be possible for you to present to the N. Y. Public Library copies of publications which have appeared to date; and to have our name placed upon your complimentary mailing-list 50 that future issues will be forwarded to us as printed? Reports, bulletins, monographs will be most welcome. (Signed per Lingel 8-28-40).

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

• 1872, April 20. Robert Edward Edmondson born in Dayton, Ohio; father Edward Edmondson, artist, prize-winner in Ohio and California State Exhibits; mother, Mary Tortence-Edmondson, "Daughter of American Revolution;" Father died 1885 at 55 of heart attack, mother, 93, of old age. Ancestry, pre-American Revolution, Scotch English descent.
• 1880, Education Public Schools; start Santa Barbara. California, taken there at 8 years of age; later San Francisco; finished public schools in Hartwell, Ohio, near Cincinnati, after returning east following death of father. Religion: Christian, non-churchman. Politics: Independent Republican.
• 1888, Business Career started in Denver, Colorado, civil engineering, but family breakup prevented continuance.
• 1889, in Elyria, Ohio, taught self stenography and typewriting to support mother and self; moving to Cincinnati, there taking position with Baltimore & Ohio RR. Soon after made Secretary to General Freight Agent, Queen & Crescent (Cincinnati-New Orleans) Railroad System. Traveled throughout south. \$100 monthly plus expenses.
• 1892. Went to Washington D.C. as Secretary to General Freight Agent of Southern Railroad System.
• 1894. Limited opportunities in railroad field caused him to leave Washington and return to Cincinnati to take a position at \$50 a month as "cub" reporter on Cincinnati Evening Post. After police court reporting, he received \$30 a week on "general assignment."
        • 1897. Became Cincinnati manager for Scripps-McRae National Press Service.
• 1899. Went to New York as correspondent there for about 20 western newspapers; later accepted sub-editorishp on James Gordon Bennett's famous New York Herald.
• 1900. Finding night work harmful to health, he joined the N. Y. Mail & Express; then the N. Y. Evening Journal, and soon thereafter was financial reporter, serving the weekly "Town Topics" as Financial Editor.
• 1903. He saw a broader field and with \$300 established himself as "The N. Y. Financial News Bureau," economic news analyst, devoted to independent speculative-investment service for N. Y. Stock Exchange members, posting a reward offer of \$1000 for any evidence that he accepted bribes of any kind to praise or condemn any security. His income rose in two months to above \$400 a month.
• 1914: World War One stopped progress and reduced income, necessitating resort to savings, which were exhausted during the ordeal. He freely gave complete devotion to patriotic service, and has in the Edmondson records Washington communications in recognition thereof, including a letter from Asst. Secy, of the Navy Franklin D. Roosevelt, giving thanks for binoculars as "eyes for the Navy."
• 1916: Following graduation with a 98% study-average from the N. Y. Harrington Emerson Engineering Efficiency School with its nationally famous basic rules for attaining objectives by "the best, quickest and easiest way"—looking ahead and re-christening his business as "Coming Events" he published "The Dawn Of A New Era," a booklet predicting industrial prosperity greater than ever witnessed. It came!—and he prospered to the extent of a net annual income of \$50,000—from a one-man enterprise founded with \$300 capital. His wife acted as executive assistant in the business.
• 1923: Forced by ill-health to retire for a prolonged vacation by advice of his physician, he sold his business at great sacrifice, being compelled to decline a bank offer to finance it for \$250,000 on condition that he remain as manager. Before leaving N. Y. City, his banker. Vice President of the Columbia-Knickerbocker Trust Co., handed him an introductory letter saying "We have done business with Robert Edward Edmondson for years. We know nothing but good of him."
• 1924-32. Leaving the East in a \$10,000 six-ton pioneering housecar built under his personal supervision, he sought health on the Pacific Coast. Finally recovering, and becoming "tired of doing nothing," he returned to N. Y. City to try to recover 1929 panic losses, and re-establish himself in business in the financial district. He encountered a mysterious wall not only against such re-establishment but against business recovery, but was able to recoup substantially the 1929 loses through purchase at rock-bottom prices of standard railroad securities. Highly praising, as Financial Editor of the N. Y. Daily News Record, the 1932 Democratic Platform, later, he was fortunate to discover the truth about the New Deal, and began a publicity exposure in 1934 with a patriotic non-profit one-man publicity crusade dramatically unmasking the Roosevelt Program, as indicated in the chronological record incorporated in the extense documentation herein.

RETIREMENT IN 1940

Following ill-health retirement from all active publicity on Nov. 30, 1940, this writer rested in the Pennsylvania hamlet of Stoddartsville until the summer of 1941, when he went to California to locate in his childhood home of Santa Barbara.

Finding that the climate there did not agree with his wife, removal was effected to Grass Valley, California, where, on July 24, 1942, he was arrested at night on a telegraphic order from Washington charging seditious conspiracy, his home searched without a warrant and despite protests of his wife and himself, and, as bail could not be produced at night, defendant was taken sixty miles away and incarcerated in the Sacramento jail—in New York City he was put in a "Tombs" cell. He was bailed out next morning on arrival of his wife with \$5000 bail; being forced later to go to Washington for trial—which matter is covered at the beginning of this Petition.

On his retirement from active-publicity, in a valedictory to compatriots on Nov. 30, 1940, your Petitioner wrote:

"What has been accomplished by self-sacrificing, penniless patriots endowed with high courage, keen intelligence and indomitable determination, is nothing short of a miracle. NEVER HAS SO MUCH BEEN DONE WITH SO LITTLE. I silently salute that noble band of American men and women, and assure them that their work has not been in vain. The seed has been sown! It has taken root! Fate seems to decree that it will grow just as fast as individual experience fertilizes the Plant of Truth."

(Twelve years later on Nov. 4, 1952, the American People voted Liberation Mandate No. 1 by repudiating the Roosevelt New Deal).

Never in American history has there been a legal crusade so inspiring as that which took place in the 1944 mass-prosecution courtroom, where "Twenty Immortals" of the American Bar, indifferent to New Deal might, went "all out" beyond the limit of duty for the Constitution and innocence—and WON!

And that grand gesture was eloquently acknowledged in the mis-trial declaration Dec. 7, 1944, representing the composite expression of the banc of judges of the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which contained this eulogy delivered by Justice Proctor:

"I wish to record formally, and to express very sincerely, the appreciation of the court for your very long and faithful service. You have rendered a very important public service, and you have maintained the highest traditions of the profession of which you are members."

That crusade roll of honor carries these names:

OF THE WASHINGTON BAR: E. Hilton Jackson, Wm. A. Gallagher, Frank H. Myers, E. B. Frey, Ben Lindas, P. Bateman Ennis, John W. Jackson, Harry A. Grant, Claude Thompson, Jos. H. Bilbrey, J. Austin Latimer, Rees B. Gillespie, Elizabeth R. Young, W. Hobart Little, Ira Chase Koehne, Orville C. Gaudette, Geo. B. Fraser.

OF THE CHICAGO BAR: William J. Powers, Albert W. Dilling, M. S. St. George.

Washington is now telling the Nation that it may be on the verge of a third world "shooting war" against that Communism which defendants so repeatedly foreshadowed many years ago, and which warning shows how right they were. Could "Crackpots of the Lunatic Fringe" have had such vision as actually to prophesy, as they did, the world-shaking events of today?

No! History will attest that their patriotic services to The Republic were

priceless!

CORROBORATION

Congressional investigators will find an illuminated trail blazed for them concerning the subject matter of this production, in the masterly chronological outline of Upton's Close's confidential letter of Feb. 23, 1953, bringing up to date by word, deed and identification, the progressive secret subversion of the Empire of Russia and the Republic of the United States, from 1904-5. Its digestion will carry conviction to any open mind. I did not meet him until 1952.

If the Congress desires to have a comprehensive confirmation of almost every fundamental feature contained in this Petition, it will ask Major Robert H. Williams, formerly of Military Intelligence, who resides at Santa Ana, California, for copy of his December 1952 Intelligence Summary, which, in substance supports practically all my anti-Americanism charges, made 18 years ago. I have never met Major Williams and therefore do not know how his conclusions were reached.

Following an eastern trip Major Williams reported in his 1953 February issue, as received by me, that:

"The 27th Annual Women's Patriotic Conference on National Defense, representing 28 powerful patriotic organizations of national scope . . . honored me with a booking to speak at their banquet. For 48 hours preceding the banquet representatives of B'nai B'rith harassed various officers, pressuring them to cancel my lecture. The secretive blackmail gentlemen told conference officers the usual inventions—"Williams was dishonorably discharged from the army; Williams is anti-Semitic and therefore in reality a Communist'.

"But the women knew about the 'secret government of the U. S.' and the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, and fortunately they also knew the facts about my honorable discharge, and the other charges. They asked B'nai B'rith representatives to send proof of their statements. Then they would give me a chance to answer.

"I presume the B'nai B'rith did not want me to answer the charges, and the officers of the Conference just ignored the intimidating telephone calls. . . . It was my privilege to address the Conference.

"The visible anger and smear-reports of a dozen or more reporters for Jewish-owned newspapers—N. Y. Post, N. Y. Times, Washington Post—indicates that the revolutionaries who try to hide behind the Jewish religion in our country are disturbed almost to the point of hysteria."

"Everywhere I went on my trip east I was amazed at the evidence that our work, with the work of others in this fight for freedom, is bringing returns. I had grossly underestimated the extent of our influence and the awakening. Freedom of speech is again becoming popular in America. And bear in mind the awfulness of the truth in these times when the enemy is guilty of murder and murderous intent on a scale never matched in human history."

A VAST TRACEDY

Your Petitioner's fight for Americanism has been a full-time crusade not only without any compensation by salary or expense account, but with deficits liquidated from his own personal modest savings during a period of twenty years.

In our patriotic crusade my associates and I have been able to retain balance through a sense of humor in the midst of repeated confusion compounded; but we have at times been inexpressibly saddened by the tragic spectacle of a whole people, evidently misled by false leadership, follow a suicidal high road toward annihilation, since it is patently impossible for a comparatively small world minority, frenzied or not by a grandiloquent myth, or "implacable hatred for all mankind," to prevail eventually over a two-billion world majority.

The undersigned made super-human efforts to revive that Spirit of '76 which founded The Republic, by continually broadcasting the profound wisdom of our Constitution: and in enumerating tights, privileges and opportunities with which it endowed its citizens, he stressed the fact that today too much is said about rights and too little done about duties; that, in endowing rights the Constitution must require duties—or suicidally perish. He moreover pointed out that failure of a majority of Americans vigilantly to perform their patriotic duty had opened wide the portals of our Nation to the destructive Communism, Socialism and Marxism, which shook the foundations of the world's greatest Republic.

And the first duty of every citizen is to vote in every state and national election "to put none but Americans on guard."

Irrevocably holding, with the great statesman Edmund Burke, that "There is a limit at which forbearance ceases to be a virtue," no apology is made for allowing the caustic language of patriotic vigor to rise out of the depths of indignation to transcendental heights in justified righteous denunciation of the appalling menace of Gentile treason joining through tolerance an "implacable hatred" in its Illuminatti communizing conspiracy, to destroy the only Nation in the world giving generous asylum from the Nemises of incited Christian wrath and ceaselessly goaded nationalist vengeance.

Neither is any apology made for the in extenso character of this Petition because, in presenting for judicial consideration, to carry conviction it was felt that it should not only be meticulous in detail but comprehensive in breadth, with facts piled on facts buttressed by incontestable authority; for sound judgment depends on ample and accurate information on any subject.

The pages of this Petition should show any reader whose mind is not closed, that so far as International Jews per se are concerned, the within described politico-economic patriotic crusade publications consist principally of documented quotations from Jewish records, including many boastfully written confessions as to what Jews planned to do to the non-Jew world; while elsewhere data submitted is supported by court-exhibit material and authenticated historical accounts from representative sources. So that this document is not vulnerable to biased smears, "anti-Semitic" bromides, blatant bogeys and other "campaign oratory."

GREAT SACRIFICES

"I have realization of the great sacrifices you have made . . . You have performed a very important public duty, and you have done it faithfully and well."—Justice Proctor to the mis-trial jury in discharging them Dec. 7, 1944. And in his dismissal decision of the mass-case Nov. 22, 1946, Chief Justice Laws said "The court acknowledges with gratitude the services of counsel who served in behalf of defendants without compensation. Their sacrifices were extensive, and their financial losses were great."

In thus twice acknowledging from the bench the great sacrifices made by jury and counsel, by implication the court endorsed relief needs of innocent defendants impoverished by the prolonged unjustifiable prosecution by the Roosevelt Regime.

Illustrating how mass-trial dismissal was regarded in top level legal protession circles, the denunciation below from Charles Hall Davis, constitutional authority of the Virginia Bar, is typical, and also emphasizes sacrifices endured:

"With intense gratification I saw that a higher court had dismissed the mass-case. In my judgment the entire proceeding was one of the most disgraceful and humiliating distortions of justice that has ever occurred in this country—a parody on impartial judicial procedure, a persecution instead of a prosecution. It will be gratifying to defendants to have the case wound up, though the injury to their welfare and good names, can hardly be estimated."

I confidently predict that Congressmen will be subjected to tremendous pressure to suppress this appeal from general publicity. However, they will understand now that intimidation emanates not from American sources, but from enemies of The Republic and its Christian principles. As I have but one powerful foe, you will have no difficulty in identifying sources whence pressure may come on my account, and audacity, more audacity, always calculated audacity should be effective repulse.

"Fear of the Jews" has intimidatively come down from Biblical times to the present day; and because the channels of publicity are still under "the terrible power" of the advertising purse, smears, blackmail and bribery, those who dread newspaper notoriety, justified or not, will continue to be coerced. My own dread of the fate of our Republic far exceeded any "fear of the Jews," and I fought back continually with the weapon of Publicity Audacity.

In consideration of the unexampled supporting documentation herewith submitted, having performed at great hazard his full duty as a loyal American citizen, your Petitioner does not want special privilege but seeks simple justice Redress of Grievances, Succor and Relief in the tax-free sum of \$250,000.00 as partial compensation for the irreparable damages sustained, to wit:

• (1) High and unblemished honor and reputation blasted;
• (2) Opportunity destroyed to make a living in his publicity profession;
• (3) Prolonged mental anguish during a five-year framed persecution;
• (4) Advanced-age disabilities prematurely intensified thereby;
• (5) Bankruptcy by extraordinary defence costs.

THE PROSECUTION'S GROSS VIOLATIONS

Your Petitioner was prosecuted by the Roosevelt National Administration politically, economically and otherwise 1942-7 in war-time for patriotic activities in peacetime many years prior to the enactment of the June 28, 1940, law invoked, and notwithstanding his retirement from all publicity in 1940; and in violation of the ex post facto provision of the U. S. Constitution; and on publications actually in the possession of the Justice Department long prior to the trial indictment (of Jan. 3, 1944), which publications in themselves contained ample evidence of complete innocence.

President Thomas Jefferson set a restitutional precedent for this appeal when he made atonement to political victims prosecuted under the unconstitutional peacetime Sedition Law of 1798-1801.

I am informed that restitution is authorized by Section 8, Article 1, of the U. S. Constitution, as judicially interpreted in "U. S. vs. Realty Co., 163, U. S. 208, 1896," wherein it was held that 'The power to pay the debts' is broad enough to include claims of citizens ARISING FROM OBLIGATIONS OF RIGHT AND JUSTICE."

In view of the American People's 1952 ballot-repudiation of the subversive New Deal, which I exposed in a twenty-year patriotic crusade, I feel warranted in expecting simple justice from the newly elected Republican Administration—for which righteous action I could not even hope from The Truman Regime.

Yet, if the high equity attitude passionately pledged at the Presidential Inauguration Jan. 20, 1953, shall not be transformed into atonement deeds by the combined impact of the consolidated confession-documentation herein, then there is only one logical deduction—"invisible government" still controls.

However, denial of simple justice seems not only inconsistent with sound policy but is inconceivable in view of the facts that current events are—

More than fulfilling Petitioner's prophetic indictments nearly two decades ago regarding the subversions today of New Deal Communism;

More than confirming authentic confession and other documentation as to New Deal treasonable activities:

More than warranting the claim for atonement by the Republican Party.

To get the "right answer" regarding the simple justice quality of this claim, apply the ages old criterion of time to the twenty-year record of selfless works and faith herein indicated, since such acid test is the true scientific measure of intrinsic value just as surely as "Timeless Acceptance" of the High Dictum "by their DEEDS" constitutes proof-guarantor of supreme quality and abstract truth.

In the present case, this is the memoir-report of a man over eighty years old, childless, perhaps speaking his "last word," awaiting summons to join "that innumerable caravan," concerned only with Justice. Rightcous debt claims must have priority on atonement, but charity would receive the residue.

Looking upon himself as a selfless instrument privileged to serve the public interest as an advocate of Truth, the author hereof desires hereby to express deep gratitude for all documentary contributions mentioned herein, collective or individual; regarding them also as essential source instruments of Truth whether from friend or foe, made voluntarily or otherwise, wittingly or unwittingly—including the literature listed in the bibliography.

P. O. Box 854

Dated Bend, Oregon,

April 1, 1953

Robert Edward Edmondon

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Unless saboraged the publications named below may be found in used book stores, public libraries, large and small, including the Congressional Library in Washington, D. C.; the New York Public Library at 42nd St. and Fifth Ave., New York City; and the California State Library at Sacramento, California. To them all, thanks for contributions to Truth!

AMERICA'S GREAT MENACE, 1933, by Jewish Author B. A. M. Shapiro, Cooper Square, N.Y. City ("Communism hatched in the Camp of Israel".)

AFTER STALIN-WHAT?, 1953 book by Eugene Lyons, Jew. (Must be read "be-

THE ANSWER, 1939, by Jewish Author Ludwig Lewisohn. ("Jewish Problem is one of self-emancipation".)

ASPECTS OF JEWISH POWER IN THE U. S., by Henry Ford. (He did not recant —his secretary did. unauthorized.)

ALIEN MENACE, 1934, by Col. A. H. Lane of England, (Jewish controls exposed).

ARE THESE THINGS SO?, 1934, by Col. E. N. Sanctuary. ("Bernard M. Baruch headed 117 Jews who accompanied President Wilson on his trip to the Versailles Peace Conference in Europe".)

ANTI-SEMITISM, 1903, by Jewish Author Bernard Lazare. ("As possessors of gold, Jews became masters of their masters." He quotes Appolonius Molo as saying "The Jews are enemies of all mankind.")

ALL THESE THINGS, 1936, by A. N. Field of New Zealand. (Worldwide survey of Jewish subversions.)

ALIEN IN OUR MIDST, 1930, by Charles Stewart Davison. (The American republic theory "denies democracy".)

BEHIND COMMUNISM, 2d edition 1952, \$1.00, by Frank L. Britton, P. O. Box 15745, Crenshaw Station, Los Angeles 8, Calif. An excellent Jewish exposure with documentation from Jewish encyclopedias, Encyclopaedia Britannica, and other high grade records from Senera Before Christ to 1953.

BACK TO THE REPUBLIC, 1918, by Harry Atwood. (Much of content reproduced verbatim in U. S. Army Training Manual of 1928.)

BOLSHEVISM IN RUSSIA, British White Paper No. 1,1919. (Bolshevism is "organized and worked by Jews".)

BEACON LIGHT HERALD. Atascadero, Calif. Editor Wm. Kullgen, jailed for preaching Patriotism.

CONCERNING THE JEWS, by Mark Twain. (A chapter in 1900 edition of his book "The Man Who Corrupted Hadleyburg." A devastating anti-Jew exposure.)

CONQUEST OF A CONTINENT, 1933, by Madison Grant. (In circular broadcast of 12-13-33 by the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of Chicago, boycott of this book was demanded because it said American development depends on the "elimination of unassimilable alien masses.")

CHRISTIAN CENTURY of Chicago, June 7, 1937. (Judaism rests upon an impossible basis.")

COMMON SENSE, Union, N. I., Current Jew-exposure news.

CENTURY MAGAZINE 9-21-21, P. 789—"The American Nation, itself the result of fusion, will not tolerate a foreign element"—a denunciation of Jewish isolationism.

CONTEMPORARY RUSSIA, "Autumn 1937," 93 Fleet St., London EC-4, England,
—"Jews were leaders in the Russian Social Democratic, Social Revolutionary and Constitutional Parties."

DISGRACE ABOUNDING, by Douglas Reed of England. ("Racial lunary has possessed the Jews for thousands of years".)

DU MARIAGE, 1939, by Jewish Premier Leon Blum of France. (Sees nothing wrong with incest.)

FRANKLIN (Benj.) WRITINGS, by Smythe. (Anti-Jewish).

FROM PHARAOH TO HITLER, 1933, by Chicago Jewish Lawyer Bernard J. Brown. A legal expose of Jewish claims. (They "muzzle the press".)

"GOTHIC RIPPLES, Current literature publication by Arnold Leese, anti-Jewish exposures, 20 Pewley Hill, Guildford, Surrey ,England. The Jewish Problem handled documentarily "without gloves."

GERMANY AND ENGLAND, 1938, by Nesta Webster, famous Jew-exposure author, ("England is under an invisible Jewish government".)

GENEVA VS. PEACE, 1937, by French Author Count de St. Aulaire. ("Jews are in communion with Marxism in its purest form.")

HOW ODD OF GOD, 1934, by Rabbi Lewis Browne. ("We must remake the Gentiles—what the Communists are doing in Russia.")

HYAM SALOMON, BROKER OF THE REVOLUTION, by Jewish Lawyer Max Kohler, reporting that Salomon's loans to the U. S. are a myth.

HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN THE U. S., by Rabbi Lee Levinger. (Two-thirds of the Jews in the U. S. are "Eastern Jews" from Russia, Poland, Germany.)

HISTORY OF THE JEWS, by Jewish Historian Graetz, Vol. 5, Page 364, "Judaism is not revealed religion but revealed LEGISLATION."

HUMAN EVENTS, 1835 K St. NW, Washington, D. C., independent political weekly. ("Republican members of Congress have taken notice, with dismay, of certain ntterances of Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver, close to President Eisenhower and Senator Taft.")

· IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA, by Dr. John Beaty, Wilkinson Publishing Co., 1717 Wood St., Dallas, Texas. A "must" Jew-exposure book.

INTERNATIONAL JEW, 1921, by Henry Ford. (Not retracted by Ford.)

ISRAEL, ITS PAST, ITS FUTURE, by de Heckelingen. ("Communism is but the triumph of Jewish values over Christian values".)

ISRAEL, 1926, by Ludwig Lewisohn, Jewish author. ("Assimilation is impossible.")

JEWISH ACTIVITIES IN THE U.S., 1921, by Henry Ford. (Not recanted by Ford)

JEWISH INFLUENCE IN THE U. S., 1921, by Henry Ford. (Not recanted by Ford.)

JEWISH EORUM, February 1919. "When the Jew gives his spirit to the cause of the workers, in Germany he becomes a Marx, in Russia a Trotsky."—U. S. Rabbi Judah L. Magnes.

JEWS & MODERN CAPITALISM, 1913, by pro-Jewish Prof. Werner Sombart of Berlin, ("The Jewish religion has the same leading ideas as capitalism.")

THE JEWS, 1922, by Hilaire Belloc, British Catholic Author. ("The continued propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction, is in the hands of Jewish agents.")

JEWS IN RUSSIA, by Victor E. Marsden, British Russian correspondent, reported 447 Jews out of 545 members of Bolshevist Government when established by revolution.

JEWISH SPECTATOR, December, 1936. ("The Khazars (of Eastern Russia) were a nation converted to Judaism A. D.")

JEWISH STATE, 1896-1936, by Theodor Herzl. Zionist Founder. ("The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers . . . Our presence produces persecution. The Jewish Question is no more a social than a religious one . . . It can only be solved by making it a political world question.") "Grade A."

JEWS MUST LIVE, 1934, by Jewish Author Samuel Roth. A terrific anti-Jewish confession.

LORD GEORGE BENTICK, 1858, by Benj. D'Israeli, Jewish Premier of England ("The people of God co-operate with Atheists; the most skilful accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; and all because they wish to destroy Christendom.")

LENIN ON THE JEWISH QUESTION: 1934 Booklet by International Publishers, 381 Fourth Ave., N. Y. City. ("The Council of People's Commissars instructs all Soviet Deputies to tear out the Anti-Semitic movement by the roots!")

LONG ROLL ON THE RHINE, British Colonel E. Alexander Powell. Review by Lord Rothmere said in London Mail 7-10-33, Leading German banks pre-Hitler were wholly under Jewish control—15 Jewish bankers held 718 directorships in mercantile enterprises; in Berlin 56% of the lawyers were Jews, 52% of doctors, 80% of the theatrical directors.

MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST, 1934, Rev. Dennis Fahey, a documentary religiouspolitical-economic exposure of Jewish subversions in Russia. Published by Brown & Nolan Ltd., Dublin, Ireland.)

MY LIFE AND WORK, 1922, by Henry Ford. (Not recanted) ("If Jews are wise they will labor to make Jews American, instead of laboring to make America Jewish.")

MODERN JEW IS THE PRODUCT OF THE TALMUD—Babylonian Talmud by Rodkinson, Page XX of Preface, N. Y. Public Library.

MODERN PALESTINE, 1933, by Jewish Authoress Jessie Sampter. ("Beyond question, nine-tenths of the Jews in America are Zionists"—Statement therein by past Zionist President N. Y. Judge Julian Mack.)

NEW DEALERS. Simon & Schuster, New York, ("Felix Frankfurter is the Legal Mastermind of the New Deal.")

OUR JEWISH ARISTOCRACY, 1936 booklet by Arnold Leese, 20 Pewley Hill, Guildford, Surrey, England. (Many Lords and Ladies of Jewish blood.)

PROOFS OF A CONSPIRACY AGAINST ALL RELIGIONS AND GOVERN-MENTS OF EUROPE," (1798) by John Robison,, Secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburg. (From personal investigations the author describes the genesis and sinister plans of a tremendous world plot conceived a hundred years before the so-called "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" made their appearance. The plot was conceived by a satanic cabal of ruthless men who grandiloquently styled themselves "THE ILLUMIN-ATTI," which have been charged with being responsible for the great wars and revolutions since then. (Rare book.)

PROPAGANDA IN THE NEXT WAR, 1939, by Jewish Author Sidney Rogerson of England. ("British propaganda will aim at attaching the support of . . . American Jews. The American people are more susceptible to mass suggestion than most peoples.")

PROTOCOLS & WORLD REVOLUTION, 1920 high grade Jew-exposure book published by Small, Mayodard & Co. of Boston now non-existent. May be found in used book stores.

RACE, NATION OR RELIGION? 1935, by Rabbi Solomon B. Freehoff ("What stands in our way everywhere is modern nationalism.")

RED NETWORK, 1935, by Elizabeth Dilling, Box 659, Chicago 90, Illinois, a directory of Communists, socialists, Red Jews, etc. Passed through the courts unscathed.

ROOSEVELT RED RECORD, 1936, by Elizabeth Dilling. A devastatingly documented exposure of New Deal Communism, Socialism and Jews.

"REAL CASE AGAINST JEWS." by Jewish Author Marcus Eli Ravage, Century Magazine of January, 1928. ("Jews are at the bottom of nearly all your (American) wars. We are subverters. We conquered you solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda . . . And we cower at your discovery.")

RIDDLE OF JEWS' SUCCESS, 1927, by Roederich-Stoltheim. A scholarly Jew-exposure publication.

RUSSIA'S AGONY, by Robert Wilton, London Times Correspondent in Russia during the Bolshevist Revolution. ("The Bolshevist Government of 389 commissars had more than 300 Jews.")

THE SEDITION CASE \$1.25. Defender Publishers Wichita Kansas

SECRET SOCIETIES by Nesta H. Webster of England, says "It is in the Cabala that the Judaic dream of world domination occurs with great persistence."

SINISTER SHADOWS, 1929, by Col. Edwin M. Hadley, is a narrative exposing communist subversions in the U. S.

THROUGH THIRTY YEARS, 1924, by British Author Wickham Steed, says "The prime movers in the Russian Bolshevist Revolution were Jacob Schiff, Warburg and other (American Jewish) financiers."

TRUTH ABOUT THE SLUMP, 1934, by A. N. Field of New Zealand. ("The enormously significant thing today is that the Jewish power of the purse and revolutionary activity are working in a common direction . . . and in unison.")

TRUTH ABOUT THE JEWS, 1922, by Walter Hurt. ("The Jew exists in a mental ghetto; Jews think reversely; they found the sceptre of power was fashioned of gold. Possession of much of this metal made them masters of their masters.")

TRAITORS WITHIN, by Herbert T. Fitch of Scotland Yard. The detective served Lenin as a waiter in disguise. Of him Fitch said: "He was a smooth-headed, oval faced, narrow-eyed typical Jew."

UPTON CLOSE service, Palm Beach, Florida, Forthright analysis of current Communist-socialist Jewish political events. (Author, Radio Broadcaster.)

WILLIAMS INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY, Santa Ana, Calif. (Semi-Monthly service exposing Jewish anti-Americanism.) "Grade A."

WORLD SIGNIFICANCE OF RUSSIAN REVOLUTION, 1920, by Pitt-Rivers of England. Preface by London Jewish Savant Oscar Levy, who said: "Jewish elements provide the driving force for both Communism and Capitalism."

WHY COMMUNISM, by M. J. Olgin, Russian-born Jewish Editor of "The Freiheit," largest Communist daily in U. S., printed in Yiddish. ("There is only one way to abolish the capitalist state—smash it by force!")

WHO'S WHO IN AMERICAN JEWRY, Roll Of HONOR includes Bernard M. Baruch, Louis D. Brandeis, and Henry Morgenthau beside Communist Leaders Trotsky and Litvinoff of Russia and Leon Blum of France.

WATERS FLOWING EASTWARD, 1933, by L. Frey. Analysis of Jewish Protocols and planning.

YOU GENTILES, by Maurice Samuel. A boastful Jewish Confession.

ZIONISM AND WORLD POLITICS, by Jewish Author Horace M. Kallen. ("The strongest authoritative voice of Internationalism is that of the Jew, Karl Marx; its most heroic practical defender the Jew Ferdinand La Salle; its unsung root, the economic doctrine of the Jew, David Lasser.)

BARUCH Postscript to Page 250 of "I TESTIFY"

From Page 335, of the 1952, 560-page book "Working With Roosevelt," by Jewish Author Samuel I. Rosenman, New York Judge, known as composer of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's state papers, messages to Congress and speeches, who called him "My Right Arm."

The extract below constitutes a top-level Jewish CONFESSION that supreme American politico-economic powers lie in Bernard Mannes Baruch, referred to as "King Of The Jews," Jewry's super leader, alluded to in U. S. subsidized newspapers as "America's Elder Statesman," and in Jewish periodicals as "Unofficial President."

"Baruch was always helpful when asked to suggest ideas for speeches . . . Nearly everybody in top Washington officialdom could say that Baruch was of assistance to him . . . I used to talk with him by the hour, particularly when working on a speech or message (of FDR) dealing with war production, inflation or FINANCE. Frequently I took drafts to show him.

"Baruch was shrewd and farsighted about political matters and public reaction . . . . He had great influence on thinking and actions on Capital Hill (Congress), AND HE FREQUENTLY USED IT TO HELP PASS LEGISLATION THE PRESIDENT NEEDED, OR TO KILL LEGISLATION THAT MIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE PRESIDENT'S OBJECTIVES . . . ON ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL MATTERS THE PRESIDENT CONSULTED HIM FREQUENTLY. Often he would tell me to talk to 'Old Bernie,'

"Baruch was helpful to the President in many other ways. He was exceedingly helpful as intermediary between Roosevelt and Churchill, WHO WAS A VERY OLD FRIEND OF BARUCH AND RESPECTED HIS JUDGMENT. Mrs. Roosevelt sought his advice on all kinds of matters—and still does."

On Page 393 Rosenman said that on Oct. 15, 1943, FDR established an Economic Advisory Unit HEADED BY BARUCH "to deal exclusively with post-war problems."

This appears on Page 547: "Baruch was in London (April 19, 1944) on behalf of the PRESIDENT to discuss with Churchill and the British War Cabinet matters of INDUSTRIAL, FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE. HE HAD GONE OVER IN THE PRESIDENT'S PRIVATE PLANE, THE SACRED COW."

INDEX "I Testify"

Academic Freedom, "G" Allen, Henry D, 229, 230, 231. Am. Civil Lib. Union, 26, 44, 113, 184. Americanism Fundamentals, 163. Am. Jewish Congress, 110. Am. Labor Party, 145. Am. National Labor Party, 47. Anti-Defamation League, 18, 78, 120.

nci-Semitism (AS) Unveiled. A S. political slogan, 11; A.S. "Nazi Spearhead." 11; A.S. vrolence, 43; A.S. speaker menaced, 74; A.S. vrolence, 43; A.S. speaker menaced, 74; A.S. circular flood, 76; All nations A.S., 79; A.S. Causes, 84; A.S. history book, 88; A.S. existed B.C. 58; How to combat A.S., 91; No law against A.S., 102; No. I A.S. of U.S., 113; A.S. caused by Jews, 126; "vicious A.S.," 145; A.S. a false label, 149; Rabbi Levy A.S., 157; Martir, Luther A.S., 159; "A.S. is Hitler 5th Col.," 181; A.S. chief mass-case testimony, 211; A.S. roots in Israel, 237; Organized A.S. in U.S., 227; Communists denounce A.S., 237; A.S. Questionnaire, 241-7; A.S. is patriotic, 241; Kremlin not A.S., 243; AJC refers to A.S. Russian purge, 244; A.S. is death in Soviets 245; A.S. due to anti-assimilation, 246; A.S. is Bolshevism, 247; "A.S. loose dynamite." 247; A.S. racial smokescreen, 247; Profound A.S. in America, 249; A.S. in U.S. pre-Hitler, 251-2-3; Political A.S. in Germany 10 years pre-Hitler, 252; Gen. Grant A.S. 252; A.S. originated in Russia 1882, 253; A.S. and Pharisec-Talmudism, 254; A.S. not a U.S. crime, 257; Herzl gives best A.S. definition, 260; A.S. pinching Palestine, 266; Maj. R. H. Williams branded A.S., 276.

Atomic Energy Danger, "F." Areand, Adrien, 97, 115, 166, 167,

Assimilation into Americanism barred by Rabbis, "men of the world with no religious function." 'A' means Assimilation, 'AA" Anti., and "J" Jew. etc. Js won't "melt,' 25; Js boycott A.A. book, 38; J. huddles by himself, unassimilable, 61; A.A. Jew "dangerous" to Gentiles, 80; Js can't A.", 81; Dreuser says Js will never A., 83; Js "perpetual aliens," 96; Js at war with all peoples, 107; A. impossible says Rosenman, Lewisohn, Hertz, 117; Zionists un'American admits Schiff, 119; Js a distinct nationality,—Branders, 120; Einstein A. A., 124; Js for J. Code only, 130; Js tebels in all nations, 163·4; Depore A.As, 170; A.As undermine unity, 176; J. minority refuses to A., 173; A. barred by Communists a la Js, 238; A.A. in Russin, 242; Rabbis Wise and Herzl against A., 245; The Republic requires A., 246; A.As betrayed Germany, A.A. policy an act of war, 247; Khazar Js refused to A., 254; Rabbis bar A., 254; A.A. is sedition, 257; A.A. signifies domination or destruction, 259; to Js A. means extinction, 260.

Baruch, Bernard Mannes, 19, 28, 60, 61, 174, 179

193, 200, 250, 251,
Beamish, H.H., 96, 98, 229, 271,
Belloc, H., 133, 138, 192,
Berta, L., 132, 243,
Beaty, Col. John, 253, 267, 281,
Balik, N. H., 151, 192,
Bigelow, P., 124,
B.bliography, 280-1-2-3,
Biographical Sketch of Author, 274,
Blum, Leon, 71, 180,
B'nai B'rith, 77, 78, 120, 207,
Bovcott of patriotic books, 38, 52,
Bolshevism Jewish, 10, 132,
"Braintrust" of FDR by Rabbi, 18,
Brandeis, L.D., 33, 113, 120, 134, 165,
Brown, D.A., 21-2-3-4, 118, 180, 195,
Browne, L., 38, 64, 188,
Bullitt, W.C., 194,

Canada Anti-Jewish Party, 166.
Cantor, Eddie, 37
Carnogie Institution, 197.
Chauncey, C.M., 13.
Christian Century" exposes Jews, 61-2, 86, 114
157, 170, 195.
Central Conference American Rabbis, 10, 75, 183.
Ganner, J.E., 134.
C.I.O., 267.
Chosen People Myth, 23, 51, 79, 114, 156.
Coughlin, Rev. C.E., 155.
Christea, Rumanian Patriarch, 104.
Christmas out of schools, 49
Citicism of Presidents, 202.
Close, Upton, 276

criticis may have been 1s, 200; Jemidals for FDR, 201; Demicracy only happend Js, 201; Emotion roles Js, 201; "Entire reason for massifial was in expose patrials as Nazis," 206; agencies demanding mass retrial mostly Js, 200; FDR sees "nothing wrong with Communicism," 208; J. major vice parasitism, 246; Lacki sees profound anti-Semirism, 249; Pharisterism is Talmidism, 254-5; 2/3 of Jpeople now in U.S., 257; From Palestine Is can "more the world" says Rabbi Silver, 261.

Democracy, 11, 127, 150, 164, 163, 171, 182, 186, 191, 201
Dettherage, G.E., 187, 231.
Deckinson, L.J., 50.
Dickstein, S., 28, 63.
Dilling, Elizabeth, 33, 38, 436, 147, 224, 231, 255.
Dilling, A.W., 218, 224, 226.
Dilling, A.W., 218, 224, 226.
Dilling, C., "F."
Distinguished Services to Jewry, 46, 199, 201.
Dibinsky, D., 154, 207.
Dairy of MossTrial Exposes "Jew Deal" Persequitor Tactics, a Communist Line strategy, 209-276. This daily record cits: Ex post facti violations; punishing of defence counsel by contempt fines and intimidation; impenching of pudge demanded; legal critis by passed; Supreme Court precedents ignored; irrelevant restimanty admitted; FDR ancestry exposure; lev political domination shown; on court jurisdiction established; delence counsel gn "all out" for clients; Constitution disregarded; court triings biased; witnesses diferedited; testimany suppossed: Nazi world conspiracy not proved; defence counsel openly insulted; mistrial motums repeatedly denied; prosecution witnesses chiefly aliens, entiviets, refugees; illegal sentures conduned; sudden death of Chief Justice Eicher followed by formal mistrial declaration.

Edmondson Patriotic Crusade Origins and Bulletin Testimony, "packed with dynamite," Pages 16:189.

Einstrin, A., 126. Entrapment of mass-case defendants, 204. Ewing, Oscar, 102.

FEPC Anti-Discrimination N.Y. Law, 49. Federal Reserve System, 86, 193. Feis, H., 19. Field, A.N., 87, 270. Filene, E.A., 81, 190. Fard, Henry, 150, 252. "Fortine" Favors Jew Monopoly, 54. Frankfurer, F., 19, 26, 45, 58, 129, 144. Franklin, B, 122-3-4-5-6, 251. Freedman, L.A., 24. Freedof, S.B., 64. Frey, E.B., 5, 6, 206, 210, 213, 215, 217, 218, 229, 234, 226, 228, 231, 272.

Gallagher, W.A., 214, 235, 272.
Gallop, D., 10:
Gavagan, J.A., 16.
German-American Bund, 8, 10, 15, 105, 222, 22).
Galdasharungh, T. Alan, Justice, 5.
Gractz, H., Historian, 6).
Grant, Gen. U.S., 252.
Grant, Madison, 38.
Groos, R., 51.
Gross, L.D., 117.

Hamilton, A., 182.
Havs, Arthur Gatfield, 202, 205.
Heizl, T., 52, 107, 182, 188, 261 to 268.
Hertz, J.H., 117.
High, Rev. S., 15)
Hillman, S., 144, 193, 207.
Hiller and Nazi-Germany, 7, 97, 128, 181, 203, 221.
Horowitz, S., 152.

Hochfelder, J., 135. Holmes, John Haynes, Rev., 195. How Key-Jews Rule U.S.A., names listed, 143-4-5. Hurs, W., 85. Husseini, Arab Leader, 81.

"Illuminatei" The, "H," 97, 282.

lackson, Juhn W., 218, 223.

lewish Problem in Exodus-Solution. Jewish political state renaissance plan for Jewry by non-conformist Rabbi Theodor Herzl (repudiated by Zionist Palestine Leadership). Pages 258-269;

The Jewish State by Herzl outlines Jewish exidus from all nations to "We shall take what is given in." Page 262; Herzl against Democracy, and says Universal Brotherhood is not even a dream, 262. (Jewish World Question in to the Jews.)

Jewish Religion N.Y. Group Libel Case Unlawful Prosecurium Against Author for 22 months. Jew Juiled for Preaching Patriotism, 67-8-9, 70-1-2; "Princes" of Jewry subpoened, 94; "We are trady for trial," 100-1; Court Dismissal Fullows Jewish Backdown, 110-11-12

lewish "Roll of Honor," 93. lew Star on U.S. Army Helmets, 48. lewish Incompetence Examples, 185. "Irrary (New) Cores Irwish," 34.

Jewish Majurity Grand Jury for Edmondson, 68,

Jewry First, 30, 72, 89, 116, Jewish Fifth Column, 161, "Jew Deal," 22, 27, 42, 149, Jewish "Princes" subpoened, 94 Johnson, Gon., H.S., 194,

Khazar Jrws, 253-4-5. Kaganowitsch, Lzzarus, 44, 149, 243. Kempner, M.W., 223-5-5. Kitson, Arthur, 108. Klarzkin, Rabbi, 130. Kol Nidec, 64, 246.

LaGrardía, F., 13, 89, 91, 192.
Landuran, S., 65, 73, 164, 261.
Laski, H. I., 249.
Lazare, B., 64, 88, 280.
Lazaris, Emma, 99.
LaSalle, Ferdinand, 128.
League of Nations, 52, 77, 172.
Lerser, A.S., 132, 151, 245, 271.
Lehnian, H.H., 144, 171.
Lenin, 33, 133.
Levinger, L.J., 64, 88.
Leni-Lease Act of Wai, 195, 196.
Levy, Oscar, 51, 155.
Lewisohn, L., 138, 159, 164.
Libel Law, "G," 113, 114, 115, 187.
Lihenthal, D.E., 20, 27, 190.
Lindbas, Ben., 204, 211, 212.
Lindbergh, C.A., 181.
Lippmann, W., 180.
Livingston, Sigmund, 78.
Lloyd-George, D., 165, 265.
Liwenstein, K., 186-7.
Lindwig, Emil, 190.
"Lunatic Fringe," D," "H," 79, 206, 245-6.
Lurher, Martin, 159.

Mass-Case Technical Charge, 7, 189.
Mass-Case Trul (See Diary)
McFadden, L. T., 28, 60, 190.
Macfadden, Bermarr, 172.
Magnus, J. L., 172, 182, 188.
Mack, J. W., 112, 120.
Mallon, Paul, 191, 194.
Marcantenno, V., 176, 148.
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19
Margold, N., 19

UN: TOTALITARIAN AGGRESSOR NO. 1

How Militant Patriotic Nationalism Can Peacefully Destroy International Communism. By Robert Edward Edmondson

On the eve of the time (1955) set for revision of the Charter of the United Nations, the analysis hereinafter is worthy of consideration by American citizens in view of the evidence cited that the UN has not only failed in the main objective of international peace, for which it was established in 1945; but that supra-national organization has been actually communistically developed into the greatest wholesale ANTI-NATIONAL AGGRESSOR the world has ever seen.

Witness this extract from "the text of the 1954 report of the UN Secretary-General to the ninth session of the UN General Assembly," as published in the N. Y. Times, August 9, 1954 — plus facts as hereinafter listed in this communication:

Referring to outside diplomatic conferences held by certain members at Geneva and Berlin, the Secretary-General, in words quoted verbatim from the text, warningly intimated that the UN has been ignored and by-passed: "Special interest in preventing WEAKENING of the UN may be safeguarded IF the Organization (UN) is KEPT IN THE PICTURE AND ITS APPROPRIATE ORGANS ARE OFFICIALLY INFORMED ABOUT DEVELOPMENTS."

Here we have a CONFESSION that the UN is a failure, is weak and ineffective, direct from the "horse's mouth." Do we Americans want proof of WHY?

(The current direct-action foreign policy on China, Southeast Asia, European Defence Organization, North Atlantic Treaty Readjustment, West Germany rearmament et al, are again "by passing" the UN. "What price" UN as a PEACEMAKER?)

Hereinafter, proof that the UN has been COMMUNISTICALLY INFIL-

The evidence is overwhelming, irrefutable, but NOT surprising to those whose minds are not closed.

Let's begin at the beginning!

WHO founded and established this gigantic anti-national menace?

Two powerful forces—The Socialist control of the Roosevelt New Deal and the Communist Revolutionaries of the Russian Soviets, proven promoters of both cold and bot wars

Enemy of Individualism

This SUPRA-national world organization has become the most dangerous enemy of all time, of that INDIVIDUALISM which, consolidated into NATIONALISM, has been primarily responsible for Civilization itself, as we know it, and without which there CAN be NO REAL PROGRESS, since the Democracy mass advances ONLY through and when led by PERSONAL INITIATIVE, declared by Communists to be their CHIEF foe,—to be liquidated as soon as they "take over."

But "all is not yet lost!' The shores of time are littered with the wrecks of that community "democracy," which has been characterized by the world's

greatest poet Homer, by the top-level philospoher Aristotle and by eminent modern historians as "the worst of all tyrants" foredoomed to destruction by internal dissension.

And that is the reason why our giant American forefathers repudiated Democracy in no uncertain terms when founding A REPUBLIC, intentionally omitting the word "democracy" from the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and other sacred state documents—a fact broadcast by this reporter in 1939 just prior to World War Two.

Let us look at the UN record more in detail.

The sub-agencies created by the UN Charter in 1945 to make the UN effective are:

(1) "The Human Rights Convention," a majority of whose multiple "commissions" then and thereafter formed, subversively interfere with the INTERNAL AFFAIRS of membership nations, such as—

The Genocide Internal Invasion

(2) "The Genocide Convention," Art. 1 of which reads: "Genocide—in time of PEACE or war is a CRIME" which UN members "undertake to prevent and punish." Art. 2 defines Genocide as "acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or IN PART a national, ethnical, racial or religious group," viz., "causing serious bodily or MENTAL harm to members of that group." Art. 3 says "the following acts shall be punishable: conspiracy to commit Genocide; direct and public incitements to commit Genocide; complicity in Genocide. In Art. 4 "persons" are defined as "public officials AND PRIVATE INDIVID-UALS." Art. 6 provides that "Persons charged with Genocide . . . shall be tried by such INTERNATIONAL PENAL TRIBUNAL as may have jurisdiction." Art. 7—"The contracting parties PLEDGE themselves in such cases to grant EXTRADITION."

Now, suppose NATIONAL patriots find evidence of TREASON against our American Republic by members of a minority group which, refusing to assimilate into the single organism of Americanism, conspire to subversively dominate and control the politico-economic affairs of the United States.

If loyal patriots expose to fellow-citizens such enemies of The Republic, in line with duty and in consonance with the Free Speech guarantee of the U. S. Constitution, and MENTALLY ALARM members of that minority group, THEY CAN BE CHARGED WITH GENOCIDE, TRANSPORTED TO UN JURISDICTION, AND THEREIN TRIED, NOT BY AMERICAN PROTECTIVE LAWS, BUT BY A FOREIGN COURT.

Is THAT interference with and invasion of the DOMESTIC RIGHTS OF CITIZENS OF OUR NATION?

Adoption of a proper Treaty Amendment to the U. S. Constitution would prevent such an individualistic subversion, if it definitely upholds U. S. National SOVEREIGNTY and jurisdiction of The Republic over its citizens.

N. Y. Internal Enemy of U. S.

Do you know whence emanated NINETY PERCENT OF THE OPPOSI-TION to the Bricker proposition, and which defeated it in the U. S. Senate recently? That opposition originated and was organized in the metropolitan area of New York, which is no longer an AMERICAN city, but the greatest cosmopolitan Internationalist center in the world since UN headquarters were located there. A recent issue of the weekly "Human Events" of Washington, D. C., referred "with alarm" to the alien "problem of New York," in connection with that community's continual interference in National affairs, intimating that it should be remedially acted upon through patriotic organizations before New York Socialists, Communists and Internationalists destroy The Republic "FROM WITHIN"

In the 1954 "Story Of The Bricker Amendment" (first phase) by past-President Frank E. Holman of the American Bar Association (which denounced the Genocide Convention and other anti-American UN aggressions), the author says: "The General Assembly of the UN adopted the Genocide Convention in 1948;" U. S. Delegates to the UN APPROVED that agreement; U. S. delegates TWICE VOTED to call on all membership nations TO RATIFY IT. Note, furthermore, that Ernest Gross, Depty U. S. Representative to the UN, said: "The U. S. was EAGER to see the Genocide Convention ADOPTED." (Formal ratification is still dangerously pending in the U. S. Senate).

And a New York organization, with branches in large American cities, admitting that Dr. Raphael Lemkin* was chief crusader for the outlawing of Genocide by the UN, reported later to its members that "The ratification of the Genocide Convention by UN members (44 nations are said to have ratified it), was a SIGNAL VICTORY FOR US (in 1952); but we do not intend to relax our efforts UNTIL THE U. S. ADDS ITS APPROVAL (ratification). At a meeting of interested organizations a new program was outlined for a double-barreled-drive," for that objective.

(* In the UN official account of the proceedings producing the Genocide Text, Dr. Lemkin, of the International B'nai B'rith, is identified as "former advisor to the U. S. Prosecutor at the Numberg Trials" in Germany, where ex post facto and other U. S. Constitution provisions were scrapped.)

More UN Subversions

But to proceed with the list of UN agencies designed to take National Sovereignty from UN members, and establish a TOTALITARIAN DICTATOR-SHIP OVER THE WORLD—like that which has been attempted by Communist Russia, whose espionage agents swarm in New York, promoting NATIONAL SUBVERSIONS. (Next in number is—)

• (3) "UNESCO" (UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Commission), which is designed to make INTERNATIONALIST CHANGES IN DOMESTIC SYSTEMS OF MEMBERS. It made considerable progress in the U. S. but has recently been meeting exposure and opposition. Los Angeles, California, has ousted local promotions.

• (4) UN "International Labor Organization" is invading the rights and privileges of U. S. citizens, infiltrating and interfering with labor union activities, wittingly or unwittingly causing communistic strikes, unrest and increasing unemployment. UN purposes are listed as "promoting social justice, improving labor conditions, promoting economic and social stability"—ALL OF WHICH ROOT NECESSARILY IN DOMESTIC INTERNAL NATIONAL AFFAIRS.

• (5) The UN "CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS CONVENTION" seeks jurisdiction over NATIONAL rights of American citizens, invading U. S. Constitutional guarantees.

• (6) The UN "Health Convention" is nothing more or less than a Socialist invasion of American medical affairs.

• (7) UN "Freedom of Information" directly subverts the Freedom of the Press guarantee of the Bill of Rights of the U. S. Constitution.

• (8) The UN "Anti-Discrimination" Plan would establish a world FEPC like that already in effect in New York State, "put over" by the heavy vote of the un-American population majority of New York City.

The foregoing does not exhaust the list of UN intervention agencies; but it will suffice to show why the American people should, before it is too late, consider prompt and complete withdrawal from the UN whether or not Red China is allowed to enter the UN—whose admittance would perfect Soviet Communist domination.

The Eisenhower National Administration "outlaws" Communism, yet at the same time supports the UN because (says a Republican Congressman), while not in agreement with many of the UN actions, it is the only agency in the world where we can sit down and discuss international problems."

That argument falls flat because (a) the UN (in which the U.S. has but one vote), has been and is being repeatedly by-passed as a World Peacemaker by leading member nations such as England, France, United States, Russia, Canada et al; (b) whenever honorable American representatives "sit down and discuss international problems" in or out of the UN, America has been "skinned alive" politically and evonomically owing to prevailing Oriental duplicity; and (c) The UN is dominated by Communism and Jews on the UN staff as per the following 1954 list from French sources:

SECRETARIAT: Benjamin Cohen, Dr. H. S. Bloc, A. Goldet, A. R. Rosenborg, David Weintrauh, K. Luchman, H. Langier, Dr. Leon Steinig, Dr. E. Schwelb, H. A. Wieschoff, J. Benoit-Levy. Dr. Ivan Kerno, Abraham H. Feller, Marx Schreiber, G. Sandberg, David Zablodowsky, Geo. Rabinovitch, Max Abramovirch, P. C. J. Kien, M. Bergman, Paul Radzianko, Dr. A. Singer.

INFORMATION CENTER: Jerzy Shapiro, B. Leitgeber, Henri Fast, Dr. Julius Stawinski.

INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION BANK: Pierre Mendez-France, Leonard B. Rizt, E. Polak, A. M. DeJong, C. M. Bernales, M. M. Mendels, D. Abramovic, Leopold Semela.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND: Josef Goldman, Camille Gutt. Louis Raminsky, W. Kastet, Louis Altman, E. M. Bernstein, Josef Gold, Leo Levanthal.

"UNESCO" (UN Educational, Scientific & Cultural Commission): A. Somerfelt, J. Eisenhardt, M. Luffman, H. Kaplan, C. H. Eitz, Samuel Selsky, B. Abramski, B. Wermiel, Dr. A. Welsky.

AGRICULTRAL ORGANIZATION: Andre Mayer, A. P. Jacobson, E. DeFries, M. M. Libmann, Gerda Kardos, M. Ezechiel, J. P. Kagan, M. A. Huherman, J. Mayer, F. Wiesel.

U.S. DEPUTY REPRESENTATIVES TO UN: Ernest A. Gross, Isidor Lubin, B. F. Cohen.

(The foregoing list is incomplete, but it reads like that of Jews in key positions of the USSR, now headed by Lazarus M. Kaganovitch, Ilya Ehrenburg, A. Mikoyan, Soloman Abraham Reback, S. A. Losovsky, A. F. Joffe, Boris Stein—and 241 others named.)

Salvation of Nations Emerging

If the record cited does not brand UN world aggressor No. 1, what does it show?

But salvation from this colossal Socialist ANTI-NATIONAL conspiracy is at last emerging throughout the world, for NATIONALISM is now rising

everywhere—notably in Egypt, Jordan, Arabia, Syria, Iran, Korea, Viet Nam, Morocco, Tunis, Pakistan, Japan, India, South Africa, Guatemala, West Germany—as well as in the U. S.

Communism's sinister international policy itself is responsible for this world-wide NATIONALIST movement; thereby demonstrating the truth of the thesis that the seeds of self-destruction contained in Communist Democracy are beginning to sprout and forecast eventual annihilation of the Kremlin Power.

To promote Communist Doctrine the Kremlin is being forced to promise "liberation" from "imperialistic" control, and falsely appeals to the Patriotism of infiltrated peoples. But PATRIOTIC SPIRIT, passionately aroused, cannot be destroyed any more than the Spirit of FREEDOM can be permanently suppressed.

There is a resurgence of INDIVIDUALISM, Nationally and Personally. National Patriotism, which created our Republic, is now in renaissance; it has irresistible potential power to conquer totalitarian usurpation. INTELLIGENT NATIONALISM is the ONLY hope of Civilization, just as INDIVIDUALISM IS THE KEY TO REAL PROGRESS.

Real Nationalism is NOT Isolationism—which is a communist diversive slogan, to cover its subversions. PATRIOTIC NATIONALISM IS THE MOST DEADLY FOE OF CURRENT INTERNATIONALISM. Independent Capitalism and National Free Enterprise cannot SAFELY co-exist with Totalitarian State Soviet Capitalism.

"Bereft of Patriotism, the heart of a nation will be cold and cramped and sordid; the Arts will have no enduring impulse and Commerce no invigorating soul; society will degenerate and the mean and vicious triumph (as in Russia). Patriotism is not a wild and glittering passion, but a glorious reality. The virtue that gave to paganism its dazzling lustre, to barbarism its redeeming trait, to Christianity its heroic form, is not dead. It still lives, to console, to sanctify humanity. In every clime it has its altar." (From "One Hundred Choice Selections," 1912, Penn. Pub. Co., Philadelphia, by American Gen. Thomas Meagher.)

Former President Hoover on June 24, 1954, eulogized Patriotism in a Chicago radio-broadcasted speech, as follows:

Ex-President Hoover Eulogizes Patriotism

"We must realize the VITALITY of the great Spiritual Force we call NATIONALISM. The Spirit of Nationalism springs from the deepest of human emotions. It rises from the yearning of men to be FREE OF FOREIGN DOMINATION; to govern themselves. It springs from a thousand rills of race, of history, of sacrifice and pride in NATIONAL achievement. Every nation has laid its dead on the Altar of Country. They died with their National Flag before their eyes and their National hymns on their lips. NATIONALISM does NOT mean Isolationism from the common interests of nations. We ourselves have proved that. Just as we valued our own Independence, we have fought for the Independence of other peoples. And equally do these emotions flow wide and deep in all free nations. Within them and their religious faith is their Spiritual strength. It sustains their resolution against AGGRESSION AND DOMINATION. We have hope that slumbering NATIONALISM will awaken to throw off the Moscow yoke."

What procedure should be adopted to overthrow Communism-Socialism-Internationalism-UN-iversal DICTATORSHIP?

Based upon 25-years exclusive, exhaustive and intensive investigation and analytical study of Communism, its origins, tyrannies and ramifications, my considered judgment approves the following PEACEFUL corrective measures, in view of the fact that our enemy understands only FORTHRIGHT LANG-UAGE AND FORCEFUL ACTION:

• (1) Withdrawal of the U. S. from the UN—as we refused to enter the League of Nations Trap, set by the same elements which proposed the UN.
  • (2) Cease diplomatic relations with all Communist-dominated countries.
  • (3) Stop all trade between the U. S. and such nations.
• (4) End economic aid to countries refusing to join the U. S. in this Anti-Communist BOYCOTT.

Boycott the Communist World

• (5) Establish a BOYCOTT BARRIER against metropolitan New York's subversive alien elements, returning the metropolis to the status of an AMERICAN CITY.
• (6). In Brevity, BOYCOTT THE COMMUNIST WORLD, a parasitic composite which cannot "live with itself" but must survive by sucking the life-blood of NATIONALITIES.
  • (7) ENCOURAGE NATIONALITIES EVERYWHERE.
• (8) STRIKE NOW, while the UN admittedly is weakening and while FAMINE STALKS both China and Russia, which are thereby vulnerable. Witness: This newspaper editorial was recently published on the U. S. West Coast with private confirmation from secret underground agencies: "Reports from Russia indicate that that country is facing its WORST FOOD CRISIS since the Communists came to power 35 years ago. Conditions in satellite countries are no better. Red leaders are trying desperately to placate their people with hocus pocus promises. Attempts have been made to divert them by spectacular diplomatic peace moves abroad. THE STAGE IS SET FOR ECONOMIC DISASTER."

UN Communistic influences prevented the U. S. from winning the undeclared Korean "Police" War, killing thousands of American soldiers.

"STRIKE WHILE THE IRON IS HOT!"—and SAVE AMERICAN SOLDIERS FROM A THIRD HOT WORLD WAR!"

Bend, Oregon September 1, 1954 Communist-Unmasking 1953 Book "I TESTIFY" Gets Top-level Rating (Published by Robert Edward Edmondson, P.O. Box 854, Bend, Ore.; U.S.A.)

"Dynamite!"—Publisher.

"Your valuable book 'I Testify' is packed with dynamite." — Maj. R. H. Williams, former "Intelligence Officer," Publisher of Congress-read "Williams Intelligence Summary," Santa Ana, California.

"History-Making".—America First Officer.

"Your 'I Testify' will make history in America. It should be in the hands of millions."—G. E. Deatherage, America First Editor, Lake Worth, Florida.

"A Practical Solution"—Member British Parliament.

"I have just received 'I Testify,' with which I am truly delighted. Your analysis of the Jewish menace and practical solutions for beginning stages are excellent. I hope you will accept the enclosed autographed copy of my 'Nameless War' in return, with my profound admiration. It is splendid that you have again buckled on your harness." — Captain A. H. M. Ramsay, Member British Parliament.

"Terrific Research!"-Lawyer Legislator.

"You have done a terrific job of research in 'I Testify.' Its index is a valuable addition to the source-material you have so painstakingly compiled. Only a person of your great experience can appreciate the difficulties involved in fighting for American Principles under existing conditions," — California State Senator Jack B. Tenney, head of unAmerican Activities Committee, Author of the unique, audacious and incontrovertible 1953 book "The Zionist Network."

"A Mint of Facts!"—Noted Author.

"'I Testify,' the new book by that Authority on Jews, Robert Edward Edmondson, is a mint of documented facts. Mr. Edmondson is a grand character and 'dips his pen in blood.' He prepared so devastating a reply to a New York indictment for 'libeling' Jewry that they couldn't allow the case to come to trial."—Elizabeth Dilling, Author of the famous "Red Network," who exposed Talmudism as Phariseeism, and bared "Roosevelt's Red Record."

"A Wonderful Job!"—Author and Publisher.

"Congratulations on your excellent book 'I Testify'—a wonderful job which is bound to have a great effect on The Cause."—Frank L. Britton, Editor of The American Nationalist of Southern California, an A I fearless publication, unveiling Jewish subversions of Americanism.

"A Powerful Punch!"-British Editor.

"I Testify," a new book by Robert Edward Edmondson, formerly of New York, now at P. O. Box 854, Bend, Oregon, U.S.A., is crammed with anti-Jewish information, right up to date. Mr. Edmondson is well-known to all pre-war workers in this Cause as one of the best disseminators of useful knowledge in America. He packs a powerful punch. The author, realizing that tolerance of the Jew is treason, gives his experiences of about 25 years of patriotic endeavor to arouse American 'democracy' to the secret menace of the Jew. 'I Testify' is an education on the length the Jew is able to go in America to suppress hostile criticism."—Arnold S. Leese, Editor of "Gothic Ripples" of Guildford, Surrey, England, foremost Authority in Great Britain on the Jewish Problem.

"Democracy" Unmasked!—Noted Author

"Your masterly 'I Testify' received. Nine years ago I wrote a friend: 'Edmondson stands out like a giant. With the material at his disposal he will lick any accuser the opposition produces.' I shall have to study the book to grasp fully the diobolical conspiracy. The average layman will have to re-read your volume to understand the fraudulent propaganda use of the word 'democracy.' Your book is as different from the average book written for political enlightenment as is television from the old phonograph. For me it will serve as a reference par excellence."—Ernest F. Elmhurst, well-known Author of The World Hoax, a daring exposure.

"Will sell at no Profit!"—Editor and Publisher

"In view of your wonderful record in trying to save The Republic from Marxism, we want to help you circulate as many 'I Testify' books as possible, and will be glad to sell them at no profit." — Conde McGinley, Editor and Publisher of "Common-Sense," Union, N.J., top-level patriot.

"A Powerful Patriotic Weapon"—European Professor.

"Your wonderful 1953 book 'I Testify' has been received. It contains the largest supply of ammunition extant, for the struggle against Jewish World Power. I KNOW, for during the past thirty years I have been specializing in the study of the Jewish Problem and Communism. Never have I found such material and quotations of so great importance, revelations of modern history's background, as are contained in your admirable book. I am sure it will make Jewry wail to high heaven. 'I Testify' will be the banner bearer for all the forces in the United States of America fighting for freedom from Jewish tyranny. You have given in a Biblical age a wonderful weapon for your countrymen and the whole world. Forces are struggling everywhere against the Jewish machine in the Nations. If the American people succeed first in overcoming Jewish oppression, they will have won world leadership. The next few years will be decisive in world history, and I believe your book will contribute very materially to victory. I shall do my best to make it known in the German and Spanish press wherever I have opportunity; and I plan to find a publishing house for republication of the book in those languages."—German University Professor. Dr. Johann von Leers, formerly of Berlin-Dahlheim, Germany.

"Cuts to the Core!"-Magazine Editor

"I recommend I Testify' to friends everywhere. I know Mr. Edmondson to be a clear thinker and a Great American. As an historian, economist and a student of political science, he knows how to assay the problems now facing our country. His book cuts to the core of the conspiracy responsible for the storm which now engulfs the nations."—Dr. Gerald B. Winrod, Editor of the monthly "Defender" of Witchita, Kansas, leading anti-Communist champion in the religious field.

"A Record of Zionist-Communist Activities"—Arab Leader

"I Testify' is a clear record of Zionist and Communist activities not only in the United States but all over the world. I shall do my utmost to make it known all over the Arab and Moslem World." (Signed) Hadj Mahmoud Abdul-Samad, Jiddah, Saudi-Arabia, Dec. 25, 1953. (Later: Advices from Syria reported radio broadcasting of "I Testify" contents throughout the Middle East.)

"Monumental Work Brilliantly Accomplished" —Russian "Underground" Leader

Dear Mr. Edmondson:

I have studied your admirable book (I Testify) with immense interest; and the wealth of information I have been able to glean from its pages is invaluable.

Allow me to express my profound admiration for the monumental task you have so brilliantly accomplished, together with my sincere thanks for making your work available to our organization.

We Russians were quick to sense the danger in the grandiloquent slogans of the French Revolution. We knew the French Revolution was one of the first battles won by the Jews and Internationalists. International Communism was not born in Russia. It was an imported product.

We are deeply indebted to you for revealing to us the contributions made by your countrymen to world anti-Semitism, and for giving a summary of the Anglo-Saxon view of the problem—to which we subscribe wholeheartedly.

Yours very truly

(Signed) Eugent Arciuk (Dershavin) RONDD Leader

"Highest Honor"-Political Leader

I spent the last two days and nights reading "I Testify."

The book itself is a quarter century of history in North Americo, as far as the Jewish Question is concerned, with its profound influence on North America—New Deal, disfiguration of the U. S. Supreme Court, wor-mongering, mongrelization, proletarianization, debasement of public morality, political corruption, expansion of Jew Parasites in politics, finance and economy.

Your simple, candid, non-exaggerated memoirs of your long and grand fight, with your affirmation of the same unshakable faith for as long as you stand on this earth, will put and keep you in the category of those honored by history.

To be named and quated in "I Testify" is for me one of the highest honors which could be bestowed.

I wish the book to be a great sales success, but the boycott power of the Tribe is still immense.

With very best wishes

(Adrien Arcand, Leader of the National Unity Party of Canada, is top level authority in the world on the Jewish Question.)