--- title: 'And Men Wept' url: 'https://samisdat.in/books/and-men-wept-1954/read' markdown: 'https://samisdat.in/books/and-men-wept-1954/read.md' lang: eng date: '1954-10-03' description: 'AND MEN WEPT by with a foreword by DOROTHY T FALES 1954 OUR PUBLICATIONS P. O. BOX 111 Gracie Station 211 E. 87th Street New York 28, N. Y. Opyright, 1955, by Catherine P. Baldwin COLONEL WILLIAM PALFREY Gentleman, Soldier, Patriot Paymaster General with at Valley Forge and Cambridge New Republic D…' --- # AND MEN WEPT by with a foreword by DOROTHY T FALES 1954 OUR PUBLICATIONS P. O. BOX 111 Gracie Station 211 E. 87th Street New York 28, N. Y. Opyright, 1955, by Catherine P. Baldwin # COLONEL WILLIAM PALFREY Gentleman, Soldier, Patriot Paymaster General with at Valley Forge and Cambridge New Republic Do I dedicate this book May my courage and patriotism always be as his. That I shall never falter in duty to my native land. # **FOREWORD** # "FOR ONLY THOSE ARE FIT TO LIVE WHO ARE NOT AFRAID TO DIE" I want to quote for you Ralph Waldo Emerson: - "But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it." Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike for another, causes those whom they actuate to see danger only for one side and serve to veil and even second the acts of influence on the other." "Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their influence." # **PREFACE** AND MEN WEPT:- This was the outstanding remark after the Republican Convention, Chicago, 1952. Why did they weep? Did they suddenly realize that unwittingly perhaps, unknowingly, they had been part of the betrayal of their country? Never was there a more flagrant flouting of the will of the American people and the Constitution of the United States of America. The man the American people wanted as their leader was lost to them, it was the zero hour, hearts were heavy, gloom was everywhere. General Douglas Mac Arthur, it was planned, was to be nominated on the second ballot, but the powers that be saw to it that there was no second ballot. We are facing WORLD WAR III, it is just around the corner, will you listen and will you act before we are a completely lost nation? For this reason alone is this book presented for your reading, for:- WITH KNOWLEDGE COMES RESPONSI-BILITY. | Declaration of Independence | 1 | |---|---| | Nicholas M. Butler | 8 | | Star Spangled Banner | 16 | | British Israel | 24 | | British Israel in Canada | 40 | | British Israel in United States | 46 | | Churchill | 77 | | Four Horsemen | 91 | | Propaganda | 94 | | Drifting Together | 101 | | Carnegie Boys & Their Propaganda | 109 | | Education & American Youth | 126 | | League To Enforce Peace | 147 | | League of Nations | 154 | | United Nations | 158 | | World Government | 164 | | Along The Way | 187 | | Conclusion | 197 | | Finis | 202 | | Bibliography | 203 | | Index | 204 | We were not taught hate, as our enemies would have us believe, we were taught the meaning of our freedom, the price we paid to attain it. We knew about the Boston Tea Party, why the tea was dumped in the harbor rather than pay the heavy taxes levied on it. We were taught the meaning of the Stamp Act and when the Fourth of July came it was given particular attention as the day of our Independence. For weeks men worked to build two large bonfires, one on Castle Hill, the other on Gallows Hill, tar barrels were piled high, old sleepers from the railroad tracks were covered with tar and placed on the pile, at the top for days flew the Stars and Stripes. At midnight, July 3rd, after an evening of music and fireworks, some man climbed the ladder at the side, the Stars and Stripes were brought down, the barrels were lighted. It was a bonfire that could be seen for miles around, it burned into the early hours of the morning, sometimes until six o'clock. No one thought of sleeping, old and young were awake, it was the day of our Independence, we thought, from the taxation and the tyranny of the British. Some of you will remember those days, some will never have heard of them for a strange silence of those days has come over our beloved country, a silence that bears a serious and tragic omen. What the Founders of this Republic fought and died for is fast slipping from our grasp, down through the years many attempts to wrest from us that well earned liberty have been made. England has never forgotten the wealth she lost when we gained our Independence. Contrary to the advice of our all wise Founding Fathers, this country was drawn into the vortex of the intrigue. For a while it was a question whether we would go on the side of England or Germany. The J. P. Morgan banking house was the fiscal banker for the British and the French, they used not only their own funds but called on the bankers around the country. Things were not going so well for the Allies, England had her back to the wall, more help was needed, the bankers around the country were alarmed, they had loaned—other people's money, they called J. P. Morgan for the loans, he could not meet them. It was then that Mr. Morgan took a trip to Washington, Woodrow Wilson declared war, the United States Treasury took over the Morgan loans, which meant that they were transferred to the backs of the American people, they are still our obligation. Britain has never paid them, the principle was cancelled and this government only required payment of the interest. Never will I forget the night the American Legion bestowed their That their names may forever be on the Honor Roll they are listed here: The Honorable James A. Reed, Missouri, The Honorable Henry Cabot Lodge, Massachusetts. The Honorable William E. Borah, Idaho The Honorable Thomas Watson, Indiana The Honorable Boise Penrose, Pennsylvania, The Honorable Philander Knox, Illinois. The Honorable Hiram Johnson, California The Honorable Miles Poindexter The Honorable Albert Cummings In order to do justice to the men who have given their lives in the defense of this country and to their families who have suffered with them, it is our duty to sift the wheat from the chaff, to expose those who have connived and conspired to deprive us of our sovereign rights so dearly bought. The following chapters are written to give you, the discerning reader, at least part of the evidence that you may join those who are willing to risk the taunts of their fellow men and the sneers of the Doubting Thomases. What is written in these pages is not propaganda but facts, facts that you can prove for yourself, if you will but take the time and the trouble. A short synopsis at this point may be helpful; The Government of the United States is divided into three parts, the Executive, which is the Presidency, whose duty is to carry out the laws enacted by the Congress. This does not grant to the President the power to demand legislation passed because the President or some other acting for him has made promises contrary to the Constitution. The second is the Congress, composed of the Senate and the House of Representatives, whose duty it is to make the laws; laws that should be discussed on their merit, not by what are termed 'must', nor the passing of laws which these men have not read. Third is the Judiciary, this body is composed of men, appointed for life or good beaviour by the President and sanctioned by the Senate. It was by this treaty clause that President Truman was able to put over the UNITED NATIONS. That it was not for the common good has been demonstrated by the fact that two of our Senators, Mc Carran and Connelly (the latter no longer in office) have both said they regretted that they had voted for it, others, at the time, felt that they should vote for this Charter, but were really against it. In any event they thought it would fall apart. Rather a sad commentary now that we are fighting to retain our sovereignty, in fact we might say to regain our sovereignty. (See Congressional Record, December 4, 1945, Senator William Langer, N. D.) That the whole plan was not put in the original charter is a known fact, it would not have been accepted, but by subterfuge sub-organizations with power were added. There are two hundred or more such units of which What enabled Lord Bryce to make these predictions, later we will throw some light on these questions. as a cosmopolitan and to imagine that for this reason he stands on a higher plane than the one occupied by his countrymen who stayed at home. He may make pretensions to omnipotence and undertake rash experiments. He may attitudinize for the benefit of his foreign friends and perform vivisections on the American people to show foreign nations how completely he is master here and how all able he is to serve them financially. He may talk of disarmament in public while privately scheming for war. He may pretend to promote the welfare of children while privately giving orders which will cause them to starve. He may adopt the sanctity of the American home as a slogan of respectability while presiding over the eviction of millions. He may admonish the people of the United States to give of their substance to foreign nations in which he himself has an interest while an army of young Americans may be tramping the highways in physical want and pain." Mr Taft:—"I think the Senator is correct But I say to him and to Just how can you pool the sovereignties of nations without conceding your own rights? "If this is done, the article continues, the effect will be, not to make her (Britain) increasingly subservient to America, but to give her much better opportunities to influence American policy than she now has." - M. A. Calovanni, late judge, Native Court of Appeal. Egypt 2, Rue de Lyon, Paris. - C. G. Dehn, 85 London Wall, London. Mr. Campbell Lee, 1 Brook Court, Middle Temple, London, The above quotation is from the book, "We Must Save The Republic" by the late Honorable Stephen A. Day, Congressman from Illinois. and the Nicholas Murray Butler is well known as the late President of Columbia University, to many he is better known as the Chairman of the Board of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. In this capacity he wielded great power in the affairs of this nation. An internationalist at heart and more interested in the supremacy of the British Empire than the sovereignty of the United States he lost no opportunity to advance the League of Nations, the League to Enforce Peace and the United Nations as the preludes to a world government. Much has been said about the aims of the Soviet Russian policy of world domination while little or nothing has been said about the aims of the British to establish their well laid plans for the "British Commonwealth of the World." Outstanding was his half page broadside editorial of December 18, 1934 captioned:—"CARNIEGIE MONEY AND COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA". "A NEW DEAL IN DISLOYALTY". Mr. Hearst continues:—"The organ which carries such stuff, even if it has the imprint of the Carnegie Endowment, is not one whit less blameworthy and censurable than the skulking enemy of society whose scene of operations is the dark alley and the hideout." "It has steadily condoned Europe's repudiation of its debts to the United States." "He despises their propaganda and their endowed publications which exist only to disseminate it." "By such publications the Carnegie Endowment not only affronts the American reading public, but it discredits the press itself and the freedom which the latter enjoys under the Constitution." end of quote. Mr. Hearst came to us again, March 11, 1935, with another broadside editorial, another half page. Listen to what he said this time:— "There are now 352 such clubs in American Colleges (note: this was in 1935 and it is now 1954) and 100 clubs in high schools. The laboratory where this poisonous 'literature' emanates is at the Endowment offices 342 Madison Avenue, New York City." "No paid agent of a European power was ever more brazen than this representative of the predatory big shots of Europe. When he (Butler) said that his proposition to make America a part of Europe is analogous to the welding together of the thirteen colonies into a whole." "A WORLD STATE today means either world communism or world fascism,—both of which are regressions, atavisms, completely at variance with the American spirit of personal liberty and national independence." Mr. Tinkham also told the Crongress that the vast expenditure of money and the dissemination of propaganda were now being employed by seditious groups. Warning that we would be embroiled in the quarrels of Europe, Mr. Tinkham named the Carnegie Corporation with its \\$125,000,000.00 fund, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace with its \\$10,000,000.00 fund and the Rockefeller Foundation with its \\$165,000,000.00 fund as the largest promoters of foreign policy. The two leading lights named by Mr. Tinkham were Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler and Professor James T. Shotwell, whom he termed an expatriated British subject. We will hear more of Mr. Shotwell later but for the moment let us leave him as a Carnegic Trustee. Also asking for the investigation of these funds were the late Hon. Louis T. Mc Fadden of Pennsylvania and the Hon. Martin J. Sweeney of Ohio. To these valiant men was turned a deaf ear, but with much struggling and an Alger Hiss we finally had the Cox Bill. This Bill was for the investigation of the tax exempt foundations, unfortunately Congressman Cox died. After some delay the investigation was turned over to Congressman Carrol Reece of Tennesee. Hearings have been held, but the behaviour of Congressman Hayes of Ohio has impeded progress. The foundations have not taken kindly to these investigations, they would much prefer the American people looked upon them as great philanthropists than to have it known that these monies were being used to destroy this great country in the interests of a world government. They hide under a very clever cloak for they would have you believe that this is all for peace, to stop war, but the wars go on and more and more American boys are sent to an untimely grave. American people, are being taxed to support. We, more important than all else, would not be battling to preserve our severeignty, for all these things are but the outcome of the conniving of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. When England was in the doldrums in 1921 they called on Mr. Butler for help and advice, what were they to do? Mr. Butler found an idea, he voiced it to the Pilgrim Society (this is the society comprising those who believe this country and England should be one) at their annual meeting. His idea was that he would like to see an Asiatic combine, the Pan-American Union, the Balkan Combine, and the United States of Europe as a prelude to a world government, it was easier, said Mr. Butler, to draw together three or four component parts of the world than fifty or sixty nations." Would this benefit the United States, and if so how? World Government means giving to others the control of our country, world police means sending American boys to the far corners of the world to keep the people under control, it means more and more Korea police actions, world currency means merging the dollar with the currencies of the pound. True, indeed, that the American dollar is not worth its full value today, but under world currency it might be worth very much less, it could even be put down to the value of five cents as we were warned at the time of the Bretton Woods meetings. When, however, we come to the question of the raw materials, it would mean that the United States would have to give our raw materials to the world, especially England, where there are virtually no raw materials, just a little coal and a little tin. England has to depend on her Empire for her In furtherance of his plan, Dr. Butler called a meeting October 4, 1935 at the Mc Millen Theatre. It was a gathering of the so-called Peace Societies and the formation of the National Peace Conference. Among those attending were Newton D. Baker, Robert S. Morris, University of Pennsylvania; Senator Pope, Henry L. Stimson, Thomas J. Watson, (International Business Machines and Carnegie Trustee), Miss Josephine Schain; John Nevin Sayre; William T. Stone; Walter Van Kirk; Dr. James T. Shotwell; Clark M. Eichelberger; Dr. Esther C. Brunauer; Evans Clark; Dr. Stephen Duggan; Charles G. Fenwick; Mrs. Henry L. Fradkin; Mr. Henry S. Haskell; Herbert S. Houston; Prof. Manley O. Hudson; Mrs. Hannah Clothier Hull; Prof. Philip C. Jessup; Thomas W. Lamont; Dr. William P. Merrill; Miss Henrietta Roelofs; Dr. James Brown Scott; Mrs. Estelle M. Sternberger; Norman Thomas; Prof. Quincy Wright; Gordon Watts and others. Their plans were based on the Chatham House Conference. They found that it was financed by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, that left wing and radical pamphlets were distributed, that twenty-nine organizations were participating, that John Nevin Sayre whose brother Francis B. Sayre was under secretary at the State Department, Washington, was chosen Chairman, that Dr. Butler and Dr. Harry Emerson Fosdick were chosen honorary Vice Presidents, although they were not present. Walter W. Van Kirk of the Federal Council of Churches was named a Director, Dr. James T. Shotwell and Clark M. Eichelberger of the League of Nations Society were elected to the Steering Committee." A national radio campaign for INTERNATIONALISM was planned. prominent men and women, whose names were not connected with the conference were selected for the broadcasting. Eddie Cantor and Irving Cobb were proposed for their low class appeal." (Undoubtedly an expression to mean popular appeal.) They hoped to challenge the appeals to Nationalism. A second meeting was planned to be held in Philadelphia, Pa., January 4, 1936. The "New York American," New York City in its issue of March, 1937 quotes Dr. Butler as saying:—"the isms have checked the spread of democracy in the Western World, a World Police Force and genuine World Organization are the only effective means of preventing war. The Democratic peoples must stand together." Church Peace Union was set up in 1910 by Andrew Carnegie with a two million dollar fund, it in turn set up the World Alliance for International Friendship through the churches as well as the Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America. Under this category falls the National Catholic Welfare Council, although Archbishop Noll of Fort Wayne writes that Rockefeller money rather than Carnegie money has been used in this organization. It really does not matter for according to the Carnegie Year Book, 1934 when the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations found that they were doing the same work, they joined forces. When Dr. Butler resigned the Chairmanship of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, John Foster Dulles became its chairman, in this capacity he appointed Alger Hiss to the Presidency of the organization. One must remember that Alger Hiss was defended in his first trial by John Foster Dulles, and also that he was imprisoned for perjury and not because he was a communist or a traitor. I do not regard Alger Hiss as a communist, as we think of them, but rather as one who was promoting communism as a means of destroying national government. He was a paid hireling, serving his masters. The aim of the Master being World Government, and the record will show that John Foster Dulles has been a promoter of world government for many years, that he has worked through and with the Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America. Reference to the records of the Delaware Conference under the Conference for a Just and Durable Peace will establish this fact beyond a question of doubt. The Conference was organized at Atlantic City in 1940. Much more could be said of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the un-American activities of the late Dr. Butler but there are other things which must be brought to your attention. Things you should know if we are to save our country and our sovereignty. # CHAPTER 3 "Whereas, tradition and history have always associated the melody and words of this immortal song with heroic deeds and patriotic endeavour; and "Whereas; on occasion certain musical conductors have been guilty of refusing to play it; "That the "Star Spangled Banner" be adopted and authorized as the National Anthem of the United States of America, and that recognition begiven it as such on all appropriate occasions." "Francis Scott Key went from Frederick, Maryland to Baltimore under orders from the President to secure the release of Dr. Beanes, who had been captured and held by the British. Taken aboard the ship Minden where he went to consult the British Commander, he was detained because of the attack planned for that night. Thus did he witness the bombs flying from the British ships to the fort, knowing that his friends, relatives were being bombarded, that success meant a march on Philadelphia, New York and the entire country, there, under great suspense and a soul in agony, seeing the Star Spangled Banner still waving in the breeze took pencil and paper and wrote those immortal words which brought an upsurge to our people and saved our nation." The leader of the Boston Symphony orchestra refused to play it. Farther on Mrs. Stetson speaks of the Sword of the Spirit of which we are hearing so much today. Mr. John Martin was called. Mr. Martin was Chairman of the Bureau for American Ideals, he produced an article by Mrs. Stetson with the Stars and Stripes and the Union Jack linked, the two brothers, Johnathon and John, Ephraim and Manassch shaking hands, Britain and America, the two nations that must unite to rule the world. In his reply Mr. Fairchild wrote:—"There was evident need to legalize the anthem." On August 17, 1927 Miss Cheatham addressed President Coolidge to oppose the adoption of our anthem. She did not succeed. Henry Barnhart was another who refused to play the National Anthem in Central Park But that was not all, at this gathering of the Port Society arranged by Mrs. Scarborough in co-operation with Mr. Gloster Armstrong, Consul-General to this country from Great Britain, Mrs. Scarborough made the following statement:— "America takes a back seat tonight—yes takes a back seat with great pleasure, because the foreground of this picture is occupied by Great Britain and France." (applause.) Monsieur Leibert, speaking at this meeting of the Port Society, said:— "It is indisputable that the staunch friendship, close union, I am not speaking of alliance, between the three great nations, Great Britain, the United States and France is absolutely necessary to the welfare and to the peace of the world." When the flat crive here another historie inscription been used in Unerbourg at the first July 14th of Liberation.' And also on the flag was Gen Eisenhower's autograph. in some of the bitterest fighting in Flanders and in front of the Hindenburg Line in world war I; is naturally mighty proud of his flag and Gen. Eisenhower's let- ![](https://samisdat.in/user/pages/03.books/1954%20-%20And%20Men%20Wept/read/_page_32_Picture_12.jpeg?g-16018011) ALUEB EXPEDITIONARY PORCE 'S hoped 450 Bear Str. Sources That you for your latter. I on always pleased to how from a voteron of World Way Le pureriumials, your fing periods too late to be used as the 4th of July in Bermady. It was not, become, feature, in the Septilla Sty persons in Chertaning, being displayed at the Sty Sumrial. S man approvide your good wholes to all Mild finds Charge dire Dung de Shan hom dr. John L. Branca 99)5 Third Aramo Brooklys, Nor York. STARR PHOTOS In some In to LA MINNE WORKER # ALLIED EXPEDITIONARY FORCE Office of the Supreme Commander 3 August 1944. Dear Mr. Donovan: Thank you for your letter. I am always pleased to hear from a veteran of World War I. The flag has been signed by the Mayor of Cherbourg (Mr. Raymaud), and stamped with the seal of the City. You may already have seen references made to this flag in press dispatches filed in the States by representatives of the New York Sun in the American press. Sincerely, Mr. John L. Donovan 9935 Third Avenue Brooklyn, New York ![](https://samisdat.in/user/pages/03.books/1954%20-%20And%20Men%20Wept/read/_page_34_Picture_1.jpeg?g-16018011) "Five years ago I only had to be one-half American and one-half British. Now I am one-twelfth American. I shall attempt to conduct myself in just that way." Maybe lke's over-estimatin' himself. When a person says he's only ONE-TWELFTH AMERICAN, you begin to wonder if he's even that. JONATHAN YANK. # THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER - (3) And where is the band who so vauntingly swore That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion A home and a country they'd leave us no more? Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps' pollution. No refuge could save the hire-ling and slave From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave; And the star spangled banner in triumph doth wave O'er the land of the free, and the home of the brave. - (4) O! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand Between their loved homes and the war's desolation! Blest with victory and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation. Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto—"In God is our trust": And the star spangled banner in triumph shall wave O'er the land of the free, and the home of the brave. # BRITISH ISRAEL When you are in a crowd and some one cries 'stop thief' most people will look for the thief, and while they are looking, the real thief gets away. These organizations and their affiliates publish much literature, in the Empire the official organ is called the 'National Message', in the United States the official organ is called 'Destiny'. The National Message has been in the New York Public Library for many years. Destiny came into the picture after World War I. It has been sold recently at Brentano's, Fifth Avenue, New York City. It can be ordered directly from Haverhill, Massachusetts Right here we want to divert and bring to your mind that this is the very thing that is being proposed for this country under the Reciprocal Trade agreements and the lowering of the tariffs. Labor in this country is paid about four times that of Britain, therefore, if we reduce the tariff this country will not be able to compete with the goods produced by Britain with her lower labor costs. The scale of pay in this country has enabled the working man to earn a decent living for his family. It has enabled him to have radios, refrigerators, washing machines, television and better homes. Here it is not a one way street for with the masses able to purchase, the factories have been bept busy, investments have had their dividends and this country has been acknowledged to be the richest market in the world. This is not true in the other countries, especially Europe where wages are low, and the modern ways of living have not been available. The question then is; shall we sacrifice what we have built? But let us return to the National Message:—"But why look to Karl Marx. In the past many have thought Communism desirable ethically but not possible economically, as it would not work. Now it seems that ethically it is not desirable but that economically it promises in its beginnings to be more efficient." They further state:—"that Britain finding her old system outworn turns to the Bible and finds that no system can work which does not include the Mosaic law." This all sums up to the idea being advanced today and as expressed by Professor Frazier of Swarthmore College, when he spoke at Upper Darby High School under the auspices of the United Nations, Mr. Nason, Rhodes scholar, presiding. These are important words, mark them well:—"You will have world government whether you like it or not, it will be accomplished more through the spiritual than the political." Through religion Britain is trying to put over her plan of world government, claiming that they are the Israel people and as such are ordained of God to rule the world, and under this system of Kingdom of God on Earth plan, there would be a system of production for use and not for profit. This was the plan as enunciated by Karl Marx. The Anglo-Saxon Federation of America was established at the time the Dearborn Independent was being published. William J. Cameron, Henry Ford's man Friday was the editor of the paper. The protocols had been brought to this country from England, they were taken to Mr. Cameron. Two or more people have claimed the honor of taking them to Mr. Ford or Mr. Cameron, one, Haviland Lund, who had spent several years in England. Mrs. Lund had taken the 'missing Tea Pot Dome leases' to President Harding from Secretary Fall's office where she was employed. Marcia, well known in Washington circles as the advisor to many in the field of predictions, accompanied her. The story was related to me when Mrs. Lund and I paid her a call. Those most interested in Tea Pot Dome did not want Mrs. Lund called to testify so she was sent to England. It was on her return that she brought the protocols and told me that she had taken them to Mr. Cameron. After these protocols were published Lt. Col. W. G. Mac Kendrick, of the Commonwealth Publishing Company, Toronto, Canada, with a convert Merton H. Smith went to Detroit, called on Mr. Cameron, told him he was making a mistake in publishing the Protocols and sold him the idea of British Israel World Federation. Mr. Cameron was British born (Canada) he had lived in this country for over forty years and had voted all that time without being a citizen. It was only when he wished to leave the country and get a passport to return that he was made a citizen in three days by Judge Moinet (federal). See New York American, September 12, 1935. See also New Money Pamphlet. My friend looked at the pamphlets he was given to read and decided that he did not wish to see Mr. Ford. Not so much was heard of this movement in this country until after World War I, we are advised in the National Message that this movement was founded in 1919. This is, of course, contrary to the fact. However, propaganda is to influence the mind, truth is a secondary consideration, while a half truth is more insidious. Also on the inside front cover is the following paragraph:—"As we desire that this, the latest special number should be circulated by the millions so that every man, woman and child at home and beyond the seas shall have the opportunity of learning what is happening and about to happen (emphasis mine) we have determined to ask all those who ware willing to help in keeping it in print and circulated to give donations for that purpose. It costs sixteen pounds to print and circulate every thousand. We shall be grateful for anything from five shillings to one hundred pounds." end of quote. Under this we find the words:—To the British and all Anglo-Saxon peoples" and incorporated also "The Banner of Israel and the Covenant People." At the lower right corner is a picture of the Coronation Chair and the words "The Throne of the House of David". At the left corner is the unfinished pyramid with the All Seeing Eye and the words:—"A Sign and a Witness in Egypt". We also note ships on the water. Let us revert to the unfinished pyramid on the front cover of this magazine. It was December 18, 1935 that Secretary of the Treasury Morganthau placed this emblem on our ONE dollar bill, with the words 'ANNO COEPTIS' above and 'NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM' below. We are told that this is the reverse of the Seal of the United States, yet a seal has no reverse. Its very nature precludes that, for a seal is a mark of authority, particularly as relating to Public Documents. It is obvious that having placed a seal, a mark of authority, on a document, one does not lift it and place something else thereon. There can be but one mark of authority, this is especially true in the Seal of a Sovereign Country. Reference to the card index in the main library of New York City Public Library, third floor, under Anglo-Israel you will find a sub caption—"The Reunion of Britain and America by Andrew Carnegie, 1893". That is if it has not been removed as has happened in so many cases. These British Israelites regard themselves as the true Israelites with the British as Ephraim and the people of the United States as Manasseh, though Ephraim is the younger to him was given the power of rule. This they try to prove by the fact that they possess the gates of the world. These gates, according to the National Message of November 1933 in an article captioned 'The Gates' are the chief cities of the various countries, that possession of the cities of the various countries means domination of the whole country, sooner or later. In the case of Canada it was the taking of the City of Quebec by General Wolfe in 1759 in India it was the possession of Madras, Calcutta and Bombay that enabled England to penetrate and hold the whole country. In China the possession of Hong Kong, Shanghai and Wel-hei-wel must lead to the same results." "Jamaica, the Bahamas and British Guiana are two gates to South and Central America." "The United States possess many gates on the East and West Coast of America; and Canada, Vancouver on the West." "Finally, the Sea is the most important gate of all our enemies and since Israel's 2520 years of punishment, Britain has had command of the sea, this command based on the various coaling stations in gates, circling the globe, said to be worth an army of many million men, will cause her to continue to enter into her birthright, for Abraham's seed is heir to the world" end of quote. The National Message has been in the New York Public Library for many years, since the last war it is smaller in size, inferior in paper, changed in appearance but the propaganda is still there. Based on the statement that Abraham was the starting point of a chosen generation, that this generation was to develop into a ruling race, a dominant race, highly spiritual, interpreting in its life and administration the supreme spirit of righteousness in the earth. That this ruling, righteous and dominant race should be organized into God's Kingdom of Priests in the earth and that by their activities all the families, all the nations of the earth should be blessed, that this Kingdom should be a model Kingdom. The Constitution should be the ideal preached throughout the Mosaic and Christian eras. Citing the "fall of the remaining Continental Empires and that the children of Israel should take the Kingdom on Earth and that this Kingdom should become universal in the earth; that a new covenant is to be made with the House of Israel, Britain should take the Kingdom on earth and that it become universal in the Earth, that the Middle East should come into the hands of Britain, including Egypt, Ancient Israel, and Ancient Assyria or as we know them Egypt, Palestine, Transjordania and Iraq. The Turkish Empire should be removed, the British Naval and Military base for Palestine should be established at Haifa and should be called Armageddon, that Abyssinia should be involved under its old name Ethiopia and Tripoli under its old name Libya." "Thereafter Russia and her allies should invade Palestine from the North and Ethiopia and Libya from the South, Egypt will be lost to us for a time and Jerusalem will be taken for a time." They predict all sorts of pestilence, famine, earthquakes and so on, finally:— Can you honestly believe that men can foretell the events of the world from the measurements of the Pyramid of Gizeh? . . . . If so then why have the former predictions failed? Is it not rather that the prophecies of the Old Testament have been used to fit the picture and by this hoax brought men's minds to the unthinking state that we are in today? Recent issues of the National Message print the aims of the British Israel Federation; in the February 23, 1932 issue, as follows:—"To spread the knowledge of the origin, mission and destiny of the British race. To demonstrate that the British Commonwealth of Nations represents the national basis of God's Kingdom on Earth. To show that Britain is the lineal continuation of the Israel Nation (as distinct from Jews) and that every mark of identification is possessed by the Anglo-Saxon race as a whole. To reveal the role of the British people as the inheritor of Israel's Charters, the possessor of her immunities from destruction, and the executor of her commission to develop the new order of civilization." This needs no explanation, it plainly states that Britain is to rule as the Kingdom of God on Earth. told to me by a heavy weight American financier before the crash came, that the crash was coming, that it would be permitted to run to the danger point, and that when the danger point was passed it would be reversed by measures carefully prepared in advance to meet the situation. I carefully noted what he said and left it for events to prove the value of his statement." Did you lose your money, your all in the stock market crash of 1929, did it occur to you that this was a premeditated crash, a deliberate act against the American people? The Middle East, destined they claim, to be once more the center of the Kingdom of God on earth, is, therefore, "Crown granted by the King of Kings to Israel, Britain, with whom is or shall be united, Israel-America, Israel Judah and the remnants of Israel to be found in other lands." This is the British plan, the plan for the final battle in the Middle East, World War III, this is where American boys will be sent to set up what they call the Kingdom of God on Earth—ruled over by British-Israel. While much of their interpretation is claimed from the Bible, much is based on what is called the Stone Bible, the Pyramid British Israelites have an economic system which they would have us adopt, they term it:—"The true economic law which should be ruling, based, The National Message, November 1933, summarizes these various economic schools of thought. First they cite that of the Bank of England which holds that maladjustment of prices is at the root of the trouble; Secondly, the school that believes that cheap money is the cure-all; thirdly, those who believe that both these remedies should be used at once; and the fourth, who believe that tariffs should be used to reduce wages. They cite that Britain has been forced against her will to put on tariffs as a step against the wall of tariffs raised against her, claiming that tariffs act in restraint of trade. They do admit that Great Britain cannot become prosperous unless her export trade revives Then there is another group who think bi-metallism would be the solution. At last we come to what the British Israelites hold, and call 'The True Economic Thought.' It all has a familiar sound these days, forgiveness of debts, both national and international. This school, they claim, is growing rapidly. The statement is made that Herbert Hoover, more than ten years too late, came to realize this and brought about the German Moratorium, not in a spirit of forgiveness but to try to save the United States of America who had lent millions of pounds to Germany." Here we run into a queer statement, "this spirit of forgiveness was not as Great Britain had done, forgiven her debts, only exacting what she had had to pay to America." Look back at the British Loan, 1946, when the American Congress voted, illegally, to give Britain \\$3,750,000,000.00 of the people's money. Those Senators knew that Britain had not repaid the money advanced during World War 1, it was so stated on the floor of the Senate. They knew that all but the interest had been forgiven, they knew that this \\$3,750,000,000.00 was not a loan, that it was virtually a gift, that also was admitted on the floor of the Senate, those men knew that it would never be repaid, yet they took the people's money and gave it away. Senator Ellender made the statement during the debate:—"it was pouring money down a rat hole" thus did he stir the ire of the Senator from Arkansas, Senator Fullbright, the Rhodes scholar. What did Mrs. Robert A. Taft mean when she said, "but we have to keep England solvent". This statement was made at the time the Senator was advocating an outright gift to Britain of \\$1,250,000,000.00. Mr. Taft knew there was no authority in the Constitution for such gifts, he so stated on the floor of the Senate. An outstanding pamphlet issued by the British Israelites is that called The Crisis of the Ages', a series of articles from the well known Times, Morning Post, Daily Telegraph and other prominent papers of England. These articles speak of the Great War, the Fall of Empires, Turkish, German, the whole Empire System, this system brought on the economic crisis and collapse with the resultant trade depression, for when you destroy people and the buying power you are bound to have a depression and thus follows unemployment. Threats of further wars were in the air, was there a way out, for Britain's victory was rapidly becoming a calamity. It was this state of affairs that brought forth the plan of a WORLD ORDER which they choose to call God's Plan. To put over this plan they had to tell the people that in His Great Wisdom God had prepared for the need and had appointed the British people to be the center of His Plan. This Social Order was first to be built on the individual, then on the family and on these was to be founded the State. They claim it is not Communism but the antithesis, it was not Socialism nor Capitalism, it was the Kingdom of God. If you will examine the records you will find the Moral Rearmament movement holds the same ideas. It originated in England. These activities, they say, have shown themselves in negative form, Following the same line as the Carnegie and other Foundations these articles call for the removal of trade and migration barriers. With these barriers removed the Anglo-Saxon resources would bring about a move forward such as has never been visualized. That might be true for England but how about the United States which would bear the brunt of all the increased taxes to support this Commonwealth, and now they finish with:— British Israel is the plan to set up the world government to be ruled by Great Britain, under the guise of it's being the Will of God. Here seems to be an appropriate time to put in the record the letter of the Honorable Gerald P. Nye, Senator from North Dakota to Mrs. Lohle. Lend Lease had just passed the Senate, for days patriots had gathered in Washington opposing this measure, it was the forerunner of war, the hour ot voting on the measure was at hand, the snow was deep but still we plodded to the Senate Office Building, we saw Senator Nye in his office, CANTON SEA KERNETY INC. PETAL TO SEA KERNETY INC. PETAL AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. AND TO SEA CASE. A WHE, CHROMANDS STYLES SREDECS, M. M. STYLES SREDECS, M. M. MOUNT CASUT LODGE, JR., MASS, MATLACE M. WHITE, JR., MANS, CHAM GUNNEY, S. DAM G. WAYLAND SROOKS, R.L. COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS March 25, 1941 EVERAND IL BANTH, CLERK JAHN W. R. BANTH, ABST. CLERK Dear Mrs. Lohles Of course we are all disheartened, but I find my spirit growing more hopeful every day, hopeful that the American people are going to stand ready to protest most violently if and when the more direct war challenge arises. We ought to continue organization to this end. Sincerely Now picture us with borrowed typewriters, sitting on the edge of the bed, for lack of chairs, assembling the data with the documentary proof of what was ahead for the American people. It was put in a sealed envelope, the page boy took it to the Senator, he was stopped from bringing it out on the floor, the two Senators who sat in front of him I will not name, they know, they have their consciences to live with. It was a session that will long remain in the memory of those who knew. The Bill passed. The American people were sold out, American boys were on their way to war. You may think that this is 'old stuff' that this situation does not prevail today, let me then bring you to more recent happenings. In the light of the present controversy, Army-Mc Carthy, We will take a look at the National Message, London of August 11, 1951 and the article titled "Princess Wilhemina and Christian Leadership," and quote:—"In the Senate of the United States, the Honorable Ralph E. Flanders, of Vermont, referred recently to the existence of an institution with which, he said, he had become acquainted some four or more years previously when he came to the Senate, and which he had come to value very highly. This was the Wednesday morning breakfast of Senators who professed the Christian religion and wished to apply it to their duties in the Senate. A similar breakfast was held every Tuesday morning in the House. These gatherings had been stimulated by the International Council for Christian Leadership, which had recently held its annual meeting. Princess Wilhelmina of the Netherlands had sent the following message to the meeting, which, at the request of Senator Flanders, the Senate approved should be printed in the Appendix to the Record. so how can he reconcile it with his Oath of Office? Is Senator Flanders familiar with the article in the September 27, 1951 issue of the National Message, London;—"They've taken Us for a Ride". Asking what is behind this world-wide confusion, the writer C. F. Parker, B. Z. says the Bible gives the answer which can be seen when we realize that the British Empire, the United States and kindred people of the Scandinavian countries are literal Israel." Quote "Prophetically we have arrived at the time when the world economic system is to be broken up and Israel-Britain is being forced out of it—strange to say, against her own will. How she has loved the flesh pots of Egypt? Has she not poured her millions into Continental countries, and seen them go up in smoke and blood every few years? Does she not even now exert every effort to reconstruct the old, evil system based on usury and exploitation? Does she not still desire to avail herself of the commodities, slaves and souls of men, as listed in Revelation 18? Have we not lamented the passing of our foreign investments (as war debts) from which usurious incomes made us rich?" What do they mean by economic bondage, several times they have referred to the economic system as one of production for use not for profit. # CHAPTER 5 God that we are the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel." The book is replete with the idea that the Anglo-Saxon Celtic people headed by John Bull and Brother Jonathan were God's Chosen people whom He was going to use as His battle axe and as His weapons of war, to bring about the Kingdom on Earth. Col. Mackendrick seems not to know or have forgotten that Christ said, "My Kingdom is not of this world." "It is well to remember that God's people Israel, who were to be a blessing wherever they went are not the same section of His people as the House of Judah or the Jews who were to be a curse wherever God drove them. These two sections of Hebrews were as far apart as the poles in the mind of God. Israel a blessing, Judah a curse, those who treat the two as one or Jewry as Israel render God's word of non effect. Jewry, a remnant of the House of Judah, were to be scattered and peeled among all nations, accursed wherever they went, driven among all nations, never to be a nation again. The Jews are thus the only God ordained internationalists cast out of their home for cause-the prophets foretell Jewry will never again be a nation, therefore Zionism will fail, and the Jews now in Palestine will be sacrificed in the coming Armageddon woes." end of quote. "The American fleet is being built for the simple and express purpose of abolishing the traditional British blockade in time of war." end of quote. "The Reintroduction of the Basic Principles of the Divine Economic System will provide the only solution of our Social, Economic, Industrial, National and International Problems. This alone will solve our difficulties and eliminate poverty in the midst of plenty." Then there is J. E. Eason with his publication, "The Periscope", Mr. Eason also puts out brochures, the most important being World Financial Dictatorship Crushed. In this one he told of Bonar Law and Franklin D. Roosevelt cornering the gold, they knew the chaos and trouble it would bring on the people of the two countries but that did not matter. If we refer to the Saturday Evening Post April 1, 8, and 15, 1939 we will find the articles "The Great Money Play", we will understand that these two men did corner the gold, played the market and depressed the market. Small wonder that we had the stock market crash. In addition to this Mr. Eason wrote in his October 1938 issue of the Periscope, "We are to have production for use and not for profit." Purely Karl Marx. Mr. Eason was a frequent speaker in New York, usually under the sponsorship of Dr. C. Louis Fowler, the Kingdom Message Group. Also in Canada we find the ANGLO-SAXON WORLD, 163 West Hastings St., Vancouver, B. C., the organization of the British Israel group of that city. On the cover page of this organ at the top the six pointed star of David, from which spread rays of light, on the left is the Coronation Chair, on the right the unfinished pyramid, supposed to be the reverse of the seal of the United States. Under the caption, The Anglo-Saxon World, are the two flags, the British and the United States and under these are the pictures of President Roosevelt and King George VI. This group puts out a long list of literature and reprints from many sources; one, interesting and informative, is found on page 5 of this issue "Why Great Britain and the United States of America will never be destroyed, but will live forever". There are liberties taken here for the original was captioned "Why Great Britain will never be destroyed but will live forever." Thousands of this pamphlet were distributed from England, the text varies only to include the United States. We will quote from this article. Page 29 has another article about the Seal of the United States. It seems to be a contradiction to the other statement, that it was adopted by the Congress, for here we read why the pyramid was given such prominence, the answer was: "It can only be because she (the U. S.) is that great people Manasseh was to become. When the people of the United States of America awake—as they are rapidly doing—to their destiny, and join up with the nation and company of nations which came into being at the Imperial Conference of 1926, in accordance with Jehovah's plan and will for Israel, then indeed will the leadership of the world be in the hands of the House of Joseph, Ephraim and Manasseh, Great Britain and the United States. Then as Israel, refound under Christ's Rule, may they be that blessing to all the nations of the world that is promised." - "1. A union for self-defense against aggression." - "2. A union of self interest in trade in that, all tariff and trade barriers would be removed. This would gradually grow into a realization that these Israel Nations are indeed a 'Commonwealth'." "Such a concept may shock American minds at first. It may seem inconsistent. The British Constitution is Unwritten. Much of the friction would be removed if the American Constitution were also rewritten.... The real question should be, Is such a Commonwealth desirable and is it the Will of God?" On October 8th Mr. Eastman gives us a new light on things, critizing the late Senator D. Worth Clark of Missouri and Senator Gerald P. Nye of North Dakota for their remarks about British Imperialism during the Lend Lease he (Clark) said "Britain was trying to hold onto the riches of the Empire, that Britains' wealth and power was the promise of God, quite different from Italian fascism, German Nazism or Russian Communism. That God's plan was their complete elimination from the earth so that the Empire Commonwealth scheme of the Kingdom of God can be fully established and into which the Gentile Nations can become free and equal partners subject to their allegiance to the Throne." Why should there be such an organization in the United States: Answer: this is the propaganda machine England is using to sell to the American people—Union with Britain. In chapter 5 you have read how we were dragged into the spider's web. It is well to remember that Mr Cameron was British born. Howard Rand is the General Secretary of the Anglo-Saxon Federation of America, as such he goes about the country speaking for the organization and setting up new cells. In Grand Rapids, Michigan he spoke for churches, Ladies Literary Clubs and at the Masonic Club where his address was: 'After the Depression, What.' Mr. Rand explained that the only solution he could see to the confusion and complexity of the economic system was to revert to the laws and codes in the Bible. He expressed the view that the Bible condemns the taxation system under which the world was struggling, the real and personal and inheritance taxes, he said, should be replaced by tax on the increase of goods and wealth only." We are hearing much of the Middle East today, its importance to Britain and the world, June Destiny 1937 seems to throw some light on this great anxiety in the article by the Lt. Col. Mac Kendrick of Canada who writes:—After three thousand six hundred and twenty years, Israel of the Isles (Britain) decided to make a haven of the port of Haifa. Some years have been consumed in building this great port and harbour. The port is served by the railroad from Egypt, thence north to Acre. Another line runs from Jerusalem to Haifa and east across the Jordan Valley to Damascus, north Aleppe, where the main line heads through Turkey, with another branch leading to Mogul where the sands deliver oil for the drilling." Another event, according to Destiny, July 1938, that made this date of interest was the fact "That the world became conscious that the Spanish conflict was not a local affair but that many nations were not only interested but were involved in it" It was in December 1935 that Mr. Rand said in Grand Rapids: "Another change which will have to come is in our monetary system, for God does not condone usury. Money must be used as a medium of exchange only, not as wealth on which to build more wealth. Wealth can only be derived from goods and services and cannot of itself produce wealth. That the use of money as wealth is disastrously unsound is evident in the financial situation in our country today." The Anglo-Saxon Federation has printed many tracts and books, outstanding is the one titled 'Prophecy on Parade'. It is of great interest because it deals mainly with the war period from 1936 to August 20, 1953. The book has many diagrams showing the dates of happenings to come they did not always happen on time but the book shows without question that we were being run by mathematical figures which they claimed were from the Pyramid of Gizeh. As these figures had been miscalculated before it is not reasonable to believe that these people are right now. In any event, they do predict on page 275, "The unavoidable fact is, that the Israel nations must fight the Russian Hoards. This they will do. This war will center around Palestine within the time of the final Displacement indicated above." It will be a great shock to many, says the author to find that there is to be no peace with Russia." Thus when you hear the battle cry we must fight Russia, you will know that it is all part of the plan. The author goes on to say: "Then the peaceful multitude will inherit the dominant position in world government." The author claims that July 4, 1941 seems to indicate clearly the entrance of the U. S. into a more complete UNION with the British Commonwealth for the defense of Israel." He brings out that "Independence Day was rightfully celebrated throughout the British Empire for in this union there is defense and by the agreement of July 4, 1941 he claims that the breach which was made in 1776 made possible the supplying of our vast resources for his people Israel. "Can you then truthfully say that Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack, is this the reason that we have never had a full and complete investigation of that great disaster to this nation? Do you think that the Japanese knew of these things? Even this author says "the position of Japan grows more precarious daily." Let us look at page 43, "The Economic Aspect." During the campaign Mr. Willkie said, "if Mr. Roosevelt was eleited it would lead to dictatorship, inflation, and bankruptcy." I think, said the author, he is gauging the future by the "old order". I think it is leading to concentration of power in the ultimate direction of the throne of David, to a "New Order of the Ages" with money control in the government instead of Wall Street which will ultimately make possible the release of God's bounty in equitable distribution among the nations and peoples of the world and form the basis of world economic peace. The price America will pay is not bankruptcy but the placing of her total material resources on the alter of God to receive the larger blessing in return." "Mr. Morganthau's request for the increase of the national debt limit to 60 billion or more and removal of tax exemptions from the income of future government bonds seemed to be the kick-off." It was on November 11, 1940 that Franklin Delano Roosevelt, speaking at the tomb of the unknown soldier of 1918, said to the world, "that while America reserved the right to be divided on her politics she was not divided on her foreign policy and that her foreign policy was to help England to the limit of her ability." Let us wind up this book, although there is much more that should be brought to the public notice with the quotation from page 46: "Here is the order of the reunion of the Israel nations of the world outlined in the parable of the two sticks in Ezekiel 37: 15-26. The Reunion of Ephraim (Great Britan) and Manassch (U. S. A.) to complete the tribe of Joseph, to which is then joined the other tribes (Nations) which constitute all the House of Israel, his companions; thus are rejoined the Ten Tribes of the northern kingdom as they exist today in the "Seed" nations. Concurrently, Judah and his companions who are of the House of Judah are joined together to complete the southern kingdom, after which the two kingdoms are merged into one." Thus you will have the "British Commonwealth of the World government, if, when, and where you may travel. See Living Church, March 18, 1942. Who were the supporters of this movement, as listed, they are "Woodrow Wilson, Pres. U. S. A. The King of Italy; The King of Spain, The King of Belgium, The Pres. of Columbia, The President of Peru, Maj. Gen. Sir H. M. Bengough, K. C. B., Admiral Lord Charles Beresford G. C. B. M. P., Admiral Sir Nathaniel Bowden Smith, K. C. B., Admiral Sir K. Atkinson-Willes, K. C. B., Rear-Admiral Hon. V. A. Montagu, C. B., Henri Viard, Noels Gron, Lt. Gen. Sir R. S. S. Baden-Powell, K. C. V. O. K. C. B. LL. D. F. R. G. R., Sir John McCallum M. P., John Kier, John Bruce, James A. Coutts, Prof. Curtis D. D., H. G. Wells, Alfred Highland, M. P., Frank R. Benson, Rev. Principal Alexander Whyte, D. D., Mrs. Annie Besant, Right Rev. Bishop Welldon, Rt. Rev. Bishop Ormsby, Rev. A. J. MacNichol, B. D., Rev. W. Coats, D. D., William Maxwell, Francis J. Scott, Councillor John Thompson Jun, Rev. William Dick M. A., Rev. C. C. Milne, Miss Jessie Annie Anderson, William Strachan, etc." ing with the speed of a prairie fire," he said. "The time has passed when we can dismiss the spread of Aetheistic The principles of Christianity, he continued, encompassed democracy and under them flourished, "the doctrines of the dignity of man, the system of free enterprise, free thought, free speech." "Adding his voice to the cause of a democratic revolution, highbrow HORIZON proclaimed, "We are fighting for capitalism, for Europe, for culture, for democracy for Christianity . . . . Our Empire, the rich and the sioid" the rigia. According to the New York Journal American, October 12, 1947, Mr. Jeffers called himself a "messenger for Yahweh" he was arrested on a parole violation and returned to Atlanta Penitentiary. It would seem that A. J. Ferris followed the line of the New Statesman and Nation. We also find in the Kingdom Voice the same pro-British sentiments, as come from the fountain head 6 Buckingham Gate, London. "The restoration of the House of Israel to God in the Holy Land and of the Jew from Judah who will come under the flag of the Union of Jacob, or the Union Jack. "The Movement takes the position that Anglo-Saxon-Celtic-Scandinavian and kindred peoples and groups in many other nations are the descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel and include all of the Tribes of Benjiman and part of the Tribe of Judah, the Jews of today being the Remnant of the Tribe of Judah." This sounds very much like the Cradle to the Grave Plan, it was proposed for this country but under the Caption, "The Peoples Progress and Prosperity and Enabling Act", prepared for the Congress in 1935, some of it was passed but not in total. This Bill was written behind closed doors in Washington under the tutelage of Harry Hopkins. Outside the fact that you would be told in what community you could live, what shoemaker, what doctor, what baker, what bank and all the rest of the things which go to make up the every day living, you also found in this bill the plan; the government was to take over all wealth above and below the ground. It also was to take over all the securities you might have in any company worth over a hundred thousand dollars. As you turned over to the Treasury the certificates you would receive in return a government certificate. On the original you would have to place your photograph, your finger prints. The government certificates were to be issued on the basis of payment in five years, they were to be without interest and without tax. If you should die Now you will say this is preposterous, in the United States, well as fantastic as it is, it was true. I, personally, had the bill, copied it, sent it out to key people, talked with one of the men who had helped write it, had him tell me about the plan of REORGANIZATION of GOVERNMENT, was shown and held in my hands the letters to this man from the secretaries of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Herbert Roover and John D. Rockefeller Jr. These letters acknowledged the plan and said they were in accord. The man was Albert Sheldon, at that time living in what was known as the Rockefeller hostelry on 54th St., N. Y. City. Reporting this "find" to Mr. Trevor, then Chairman of the American Coalition, he asked me to have it photostated for him, which I did. I had seen the bill at the office of the Organization 'Order of 1776.' Mr. Gulden was not involved in the plot. He had been successful in getting hold of it. I talked to Mr. Sheldon at the Golden Rule Foundation, 60 East 42nd St., New York, (part of the Rockefeller propaganda machine). In returning the Bill we, a Mrs. Kafka who had been instrumental in telling me about it, had to take it to the old Segal-Cooper Building, Sixth Avenue. The building was unoccupied, one elevator only was running, we were taken to the sixth floor, here we found Mr. Sheldon in an empty loft with a kitchen table and three chairs. LIVING CHURCH official organ of the Protestant Episcopal Church, November 1936 carried in its letter column articles on the British Israel Theory, the original which brought forth the discussion was in the October 24th issue, written by the Rev. H. Lasselles, Winter Park, Florida, in which he states that the attitude of the young people in relation to God is not their fault but rather that of the parents. He then goes on to say that in England this situation is being met by those who believe and teach the doctrines of the Anglo-Israel theory. He further states—"that if theese things are true then they meet the questions of the man in the street. If on the other hand they are not true it should be exposed as a hoax. That many people in this country (U.S.A.) believe these things and are teaching them and it is certain that many sincere and devout people believe them." I was asked to answer the letter, which I did in the November 7th issue, replying to the editor's note. That contrary to his statement that the theory had been well refuted by the Rev. H. L. Goudge, this could hardly be correct in the light of the fact that the official organ of the British Israel World Federation, 6 Buckingham Gate plainly stated in the inside cover, "this is a movement of the Anglican Church, supported by its Bishops, Clergy, and lay people and the Free Churches. That it was one of the greatest interdenominational organizations of the day. That it had been spread in this country by the Anglo-Saxon Federation of America; that its purpose was for the supremacy of the British Empire, and to the detriment of all others. That it seeks to destroy the Catholic Church and all Catholic countries. It is without question Freemasonry." On their letter head we learn that this organization was incorporated in Washington, June 7, 1935. Its aim is to draw attention to the prophetic destiny of our great and glorious Republic and its participation in the favors of God through the Abrahamic Covenant and the blessings promised to historic racial Israel. THE TORCH OF ISRAEL editor D. Paul Ziegler, P. O. Box 1442, Washington, D. C. On the front cover of this copy was the picture of the Rev. Watkins, a retired Baptist Minister, then living at the Hotel Chelsea, West 23rd St., N. Y. City. The Reverend Mr. Watkins had been invited to a meeting of the Defenders held at the Franciscan Hall, West 31st St., N. Y. With him came Mrs. Watkins, and Mr. and Mrs. George Sykes and a Mr. Thomas. We soon learned that Mr. Sykes was in the British Secret Service, and Mr. Thomas was connected with an organization named "Supreme Government of the World", Robert Thomas, Administrator of Public Relations; Object: International Peace. Among its purposes, it aimed to promote Fraternal Communion and Social Intercourse among peoples of nations. This was signed International Peace, Mizpah, Robert Thomas. Mr. Zeigler says, "The Torch of Israel is the only exponent of a literal interpretation of the Scripture and that the Scriptures were written to none other than Literal Israel." He further states, "That the New Testament is largely a Gentile-Roman book in which Rome reversed the teachings of Moses In a letter from him he states, "After being in the ministry for more than twenty five years, while on a lecture tour in Canada in the early years of the century, giving lectures upon the subject of Israel, we had a real awakening in one of the cities of Canada. In one of the lectures we noticed a very able looking man who was paying close attention to everything that The UNITED ISRAEL 507 Fifth Avenue, New York City, with its magazine United Israel. In this office we found David Horowitz. In the World Telegram, July 6, 1937 we learn "Cataclysmic upsets in foreign governments, submersion on the whole British empire and a Palestinian influx and revival are among the events predicted to happen within the next twenty years if the prophecies of the Society of the Bible in the hands of its creators came to pass. International in its scope the society is publishing a new Bible from which the foregoing and equally startling implications are taken. The compilers and editors maintain "It is not so much a new Bible as a true Bible." They claim, "That the chief editor has discovered a secret code which interprets much of the old testament." Moses Guibory founded the society in Palestine and David Horowitz came here to start the society. Mr. Horowitz claims that we will witness the end of one civilization and the beginning of another. The stage is all set. He claims that there will be no peace until the positive and negative powers meet in conflict. The positive nations he depicts in the world are the entire Anglo-Saxon race and the Jews. They comprise the whole House of Israel. He further claims that from this will result a universal government. In the United Israel magazine of May-June 1946, we find the article on Palestine-World's Barometer. They claim that with the advent of the United Nations the interests of Russia and Britain clashed. A crisis was reached in the London Conference of 1945 when Molotov walked out. Russia accused the Americans and the British of trying to make Iran a pawn. So grave was the situation that observers feared the creation of two blocks, Western Anglo-American and Eastern Russo-European. This is where we stand today, the tragic part is that the United States is the one who will bear the brunt of a Soviet Russian conflict. This will come as World War III in the Middle East, as predicted in 1935 by the British Israel World Federation. Hebrewism. For the first time, the word Israelite meant something to me, writes Carter, in the holy line of patriarchs commencing before Noah, we find one great man named Eber. From this man's name came the anglicized word-Hebrew. One of his descendants was Jacob. Jacob was a Hebrew but if research is correct neither Eber or Jacob were Jews. And you will find that Jacob had a second name, Israel. That all his family were Hebrews and Israelites but not Jews. He had twelve sons by four mothers, one was called Judah, in Hebrew it is Jehudah. The word Jew did not come into being until the birth of Jehudah. By this thinking they try to establish that the descendants of the so called ten lost tribes were Israelites but not Jews. Of the twelve children Joseph had two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh. An event of great interest was the annual meeting of the Anglo-Saxon Federation held at the Piccadilly Hotel, 227 West 45th St., Nov. 1944. Back of the dais were flags draped, but the Union Jack of Britain was in the center, the Stars and Stripes were at the right as one faced the dais. On the program was the Convention Theme Song. Two empires by the sea, Two nations great and free, One anthem raise. One race of ancient fame, One tongue, one faith we claim. One God whose glorious name, We love and praise. Dr. Fowler was a member of the old A.P.A. movement, he started the A.B.C. Legion, and held meetings in the Astor Hotel of the Klu Klux Klan. At present he is in Florida carrying on the British Israel-Anglo Saxon policy. He distributed many tracts and books and ran a paper called 'The New Challenge.' In this paper he lists several of the followers of this cult: THE TALK OF THE TIMES, F. E. Rogers, Box 128, North Park Station, San Diego, Cal- It is claimed here, that Israel will set up a correct economic system after August 20, 1953, which the United States will be ready to commence after January 31, 1947.... "It may here be said that from the time of Queen Victoria, the Royal "Page 39, as regards the fact that Magog will be used to destroy Babylon. Britain and the other Israel Nations are too kind hearted to destroy whole populations, whilst Magog and the enslaved nations, who have suffered terrible cruelties from Babylon... will have no such qualms." BIBLE NEWS FLASHES; P. O. Box 77, Lake St. Station, Minne-apolis, Minn. October 1942 Dr. W. D. Herrstrom lists many pamphlets and books on Prophecy. All in the British Israel line. apartment on West 57th St., a neighborhood which swarms with Swamis and Faith Healers." Trash, yes, but insidious when it is being taught in our Sunday Schools to the children. REVELATION, May 1936, Donald Grey Barnhouse, All Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Market Ma 'In other words, you are an Israelite in the sight of God.' PELLEY'S WEEKLYS William Dudley Pelley, editor, January 15, 1936 issue of the official organ of the Silver Shirts, P. O. Box 1776, Asheville, North Carolina, states, "From a date representing November 11, 1918 to the date of May 28, 1928, which was the date that commodity prices throughout the world reached their peak and then started down into the beginning of these past seven years of depression, there is a distance in inches marking the intervening months in a larger compartment known to Pyramid students as the Hall of Truce, in Chaos. Then the second low passage measured in inches that represent months is ended and humanity steps out into the allegorical King's Chamber"... And it means that September 17th of this year marks the commencement of a whole new sys- This series of lectures was scheduled at the Church of the Heavenly Rest, Fifth Avenue, sponsored by the Rev. Henry Darlington. However, they were so obnoxious to some of the parishioners that the lectures were changed to the Ethical Culture Church on Central Park West, New York. It was in the January 1937 issue of the magazine New Liberation, that Mr. Pelley tells, "Why you should keep your faith in Pyramid Prophecy." In this article Mr. Pelley tells us that looking backward now, most pyramid students recognized that May 29, 1928, the great economic depression throughout the world truly started. That May 20, 1928 was the date at which post war commodity prices throughout the world reached their peak, to start down next day toward the economic chaos actualized by the stock market crash of October 24, 1929. "Let us recall to your mind the statement from the National Message—in which we were advised that, "I was told the stock market crash was coming and I sat back and waited for it to happen." those non-Israel nations that are arraigned against the Christian-Israel nations and their democracy, that this is an unwise course: "He said: "A nation which relegates Christianity, democracy, and international good faith to the background, can find no place for the Prince of Peace. This reaches the crux of the international situation today. These heathen nations of Italy, Atheistic France, modernistic Prussia, Communistic Russia, Spain, Japan are all violently opposed to a Christian Theocracy, but the Kingdom of God ruled over by the Jesus Christ will be established with the Capitol at Jerusalem, in spite of their attempts to sweep it away." "It is quite evident that the Duke of Windsor will be recalled to London and may take up the reins of government in Jerusalem. He is the only man fitted for the post." (emphasis mine) "He urges us to meet their warlike attitude of aggression with a sufficiently armed force." "Taxes are welcomed as the price of our freedom, but our worthy leader fails to point the nation to God's superior method of taxation. It seems that God has used Mr. Roosevelt as a man of DESTINY (emphasis mine) to lead up to the overthrow of the present Babylonian economic system, but we are convinced that had Governor Huey P. Long lived he would have been the right man to institute the Kingdom Administration, but the Big THREE, the Standard Oil, the Cotton and the Sugar Interests in Louisiana saw to it that he was put out of the way." But that is not all, an organization was formed called the Friends of the Duke of Windsor Association, headquarters were at the home of Mrs. Stuyvesant Chanler, 132 East 65th St., N. Y. This organization worked with the Octavia Society of England. The organization was founded on the 23rd of June 1938. It was my privilege to talk with Mrs. Chanler, just prior to this date, I was shown the By-laws of the organization, you could join for five dollars, and drawing her out in a discussion of the world government, she admitted to my questioning, that a world government would entail a head, she shrugged her shoulders, but when I said, "I understand it is to be the Duke of Windsor, she beamed, happy that I should know and admitted, "Yes, that is it." It was the New York Sun, December 1936, who published the statement that Edward was the subject of prophecy, that he would never be crowned King of England. observation: "Students and writers have demonstrated and proved to be a fact that the Anglo-Saxon Celtic races are descendents of the Northern Ten Tribes Kingdom of Israel. They are not Jew, for the Jews are the Southern Kingdom only. In 721 B.C. Israel was carried into captivity, migrating westward, in the process of time, they arrived in successive invasions and under different tribal names in the British Isles, yet all of the same stock." DEFENDER MAGAZINE, November 1934, edited by Rev. Gerald B. Winrod, pages 14, 15, 16, 17 the article captioned, "Does the Great Seal Suggest Christ's Return?" # DOM OF HEAVEN UPON THIS EARTH AFTER THEY HAVE PASSED THROUGH THE FIRES OF AFFLICTION "America is going to the help of the motherland because it is our duty to do so and our Destiny, prearranged ages ago in the council of the Almighty-by Him who promised Israel He would restore them after the Seven Times of their punishment had expired. Who appointed the year 1776 A.D. as the birthday of the New Nation and is now going to unite them again through the Lend-Lease Bill No. 1776. Students of the British Israel Truth have been expecting such a UNION FOR YEARS." (emphasis mine.) Published first in 1932, the Great Pyramids Message to America." Page 106: "Part of the yoke of bondage of which Jeremiah is speaking is the yoke of debts and bonds which our Babylonian System has laid upon the people. Both Great Britain and America are piling up a war debt that will become too staggering to bear; which will lead both nations to bankruptcy. National bankruptcy however, will prove their national salvation, for then our governments will be compelled to abandon our "bond system" and issue national credit — which is the system of the coming of the Kingdom of the Lord." Much more could be said of this source. "The Dead Sea is known for its 2,000 billion dollars of wealth (1927) in mineral salts and 1,200 billion dollars in oil deposits (1941). This is the bone of contention." "The claim is made by Flenner that the Jews, descendents of ESAU laid false claim to this land and are buying the land to outvote the Arabs demanding the State to replace the Throne of David, which alone holds sceptre rights by Divine Decree." Mr. Flenner claims that through Lend Lease we maintained the rights of the Arabs to Palestine, for had not the Arabs kept Britain supplied with oil in World War I? They cannot be brought out by ballots or terrorism and they will stand by us in defense of the Holy land." end of quote. MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE, Chicago, Illinois: An International Prophetic Conference was held November 5-12, at the Calvary Baptist Church, 123 West 57th St., New York City, and at Mecca Temple. Scheduled as the greatest assembly of Prophetic scholars of the day we find as the speakers, Rev. William Ward Ayer, New York, Rev. Donald Barnhouse, Philadelphia, Rev. Otto F. Bartholow, Mount Vernon, N. Y., Arthur I. Brown, M. D., C. M., F. R. C. S. Bible Teacher, Toronto, Canada, Rev. Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dallas, Texas, Bishop William Culbertson, N. Y. and Phila. Synod of the Reformed Protestant Episcopal Church; Rev. George Duglas, Cardiff, Wales. Schuyler English, L. L. D. Journalist, Our Hope; Rev. Arno C. Gaebelein, author and Bible Teacher; Frank E. Gaebelein, Stony Brook, N. Y. Dan Gilbert, LLD, General Secretary, World's Christian Fundamental Association; Morris Gordin, Converted Communist, Author, lecturer; Rev. Vance Haynes, Charleston, South Carolina; Rev. Will H. Houghton D. D. Moony Bible Institute, President; Rev. T. Christie Innes, M. A. F. R. A. I. M. R. A. S. Presbyterian, Toronto; H. A. Ironside, Little D. Moody Memorial Church, Chicago, Ill. Rev. Harold S. Laird, D. D. Wilmington, Delaware; Robert G. Le Tourneau, Peroria, Ill, Erling C. Olsen, New York, N. Y. Rev. P. W. Philpott, Hamilton, Ontario; Rev. Harry Rimmer, Author, Bible teacher; Rev. W. H. Rogers, First Baptist Church, N. Y. (British born) Rev. L. Sale-Harrison, author, bible teacher, Rev. Wilbur M. Smith, Moody Bible Institute; Charles G. Trumbell, Editor Sunday School Times; Rev. Ralph Gale Tumbull, Blackpool, England; Prof. William H. Wrighton, Athens. Georgia and others. "John Bright, the great Cabinet Minister of England, a forebear of Davis, Birmingham, England, 1888, his last public appearance Said:— "CECIL RHODES: On January 1, 1899, in his last will, created the famous Rhodes Scholarships to:—encourage and foster the union of the English Speaking people—Meaning one Flag." Andrew Carnegie, (one of America's greatest industrial Capitalists) stood for one flag over the United States of America and the British Empire. He designed the flag—the British Union Jack backed by the Stars and Stripes. This flag has since been flown over his home Skibo Castle in Scotland every day of the year. "The CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE: was created and Andrew Carnegie said on December 14, 1910: You can consolidate the English Speaking Race (so as to) render war impossible" This great business man knew as did Coleman duPont, that there was more wealth thru PEACE than thru war." "THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAS passed unanimously a joint resolution by the Senate and House of Representatives, in 1910:—"Constituting the combined navies of the world an international force for the preservation of universal peace..." Thus advocating ONE FLAG over all the nations of the world. "Magna Carta is the background of all that we have." "Davis: Why not a United World Peace Empire Magna Carta." WORLD FELLOWSHIP, Charles F. Weller, Founder and President Conway, New Hampshire, with his wife Eugenia are the two Genera Executives. Also and next on their letter head we find the name of Charles Davis, Founder-Trustee, World Government Foundation (operating as a special Council of World Fellowship, Inc.) Bass River, Cape Cod, Mass next we find Irving Fisher, Hon. Chairman, World Government Foundation, New Haven, Conn. Amy Woods, Director of Fellow Americans special Council of World Fellowship, Inc. Boston, Mass.; this organization was formerly the "World Fellowship of Faiths." With the original official headquarters Room 901, 155 North Clark St., Chicago, Illinois. It seeks to unite people of all countries, races, classes and creeds to promote World Government, of, for and by the people. The roster of its membership is interesting, containing as Honorary President the Hon. Herbert Hoover, as Vice Presidents, Newton D. Baker, Glenn Frank, Patrick Henry Callahan, Dr. John A. Lapp, Dr. R. A. Milliken, Gov. Frank Murphy, Hon. Gifford Pinchot, Mrs. Charles H. Rowell, Mr. Felix M. Warburg, and the ever present Mary E. Woolley. Then we find the Rev. Bishop Frank J. McConnell Methodist, as national Chairman, with Prof. E. A. Seligman and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise as Vice Chairman. Then comes a long list of adherents, chief among them was the Rev. A. D. Belden, Prelate to the King. AMERICA ISRAEL MOVEMENT had as its address, National Headquarters, Wash., D. C. Box 26, The National Director was the Rev. Henry W. Stough. It lists a business address as Box 1226, Miami, Florida. It also has an address at 528 Gay St., Knoxville, Tennessee. Under the Kingdom Gospel column one can see the association with other groups all over the country. The October 15, 1934 issue captioned Anti-Hoarding Number, NA-TIONAL EMERGENCY: America Israel Message to avert National Self Destruction and Build GOD'S NEW AMERICA. In this Mr. Stough praises President Roosevelt for the Bank Holiday. He likewise states a belief that the British and the people of the United States are the Israel people, the ten lost tribes, in this pamphlet we find the diagram tracing the line from Abraham. Proclaiming the forgiveness of debts and no interest, he takes issue with Wall St. which he terms "The Spider's Web", that to follow God's way one must give, give. In other words we are to give to Britain and forgive the debts and interest already owing. What about the American people, must they shoulder the burdens that they did not seek? In 1935 the magazine became America Israel, here he tells us that in Hebrew "Britain"—Berith (or Brith) means the Covenant people. We now find that Harold E. Stough has been sent to Palestine by the British Israel Federation of London October 1, 1936, magazine tells us, "While Britain was gathering her immense fleet from various waters of the world for demonstration purposes, operations of the WEST INDIES FLEET WERE MOMENTOUS but unnoticed. For every British craft that was sent to the Mediterrean from the West Indies, a United States ship TOOK ITS PLACE. In order that this might be possible, members of the American fleet came as far as the Pacific, thru the Panama Canal; men off duty were called to their posts in many a naval base. THIS CO-OPERATIVE ATTITUDE AMONG BLOOD BROTHERS OF EPHRAIM AND MANASSEH-ISRAEL, HAS EUROPE RE-MAPPING ITS MILITARY COURSES." They go on to tell us that this is not domination but that, "IT IS A SERVICE TO THE WORLD." Perhaps, but we know what we have when we keep our sovereignty, this plan is an experimentation, it might save the British Empire by setting up the British Commonwealth of the World. Would it benefit the United States, for remember we would have to send our boys to police the world for the British and we would have to pay the taxes for their dominion. It is an old and wise axiom: "Give not up the old friend for the new." In the July 19, 1946 issue of "Showers of Blessing," Evangelist Blessing prints one of his sermons: 'Russia the Great Red Dragon.' in which he says:—"The British Empire will be saved only by moving the throne to Canada and the Navy to the waters on this side of the Atlantic and the Army to this continent. Let us hope that many of the English people will be able to escape from the wrath to come and to reach North America before World War III begins, Ephraim (England) must unite with Manasseh (U. S. A.) in North America, the larger latter day land of Israel. After the victory is won, of course, the covenant will be renewed to Britain (Covenant Land) in the islands. I love the English. I am very much pro-British, but I must speak the truth. I dare not prophecy lies or soft things. England and America and all Israel from all over the world must unite in North America and here upon this continent the Russian army will be destroyed when they attempt an all out invasion of Anglo-American Israel. With the victory won the two houses of Israel (Great Britain and the U. S. A.) will be united. "And I will make one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel; and one King shall be King to them all; and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all . . . And David my servant shall be king to them all; and they shall have one shepherd; they shall also walk in my judgment and observe my statutes, and do them." "For 1000 years Israel (Great Britain and the U. S. A.) under King David will rule the world over which Jesus Christ the King Eternal, Immortal, INVISABLE will reign supreme." The above is evidently quoted from the Cross and the Flag, February 1946, founded by G. L. K. Smith and printed by the Reverend Blessing in his "Showers of Blessing." It all runs true to the British Israel line. Since South America is part of this hemisphere it may not be amiss to include here the article found in the Standard, Buenes Aires, November 4, 1948, page 6, the article is titled:—"The Great Pyramid Talk" by Mr. Giles. In a letter to the Methodist Youth Fellowship, Dr. Giles says: "There was no construction in the world that had been given so much attention, that it was the Bible in stone, that it prefaced the great events to be manifest # CHAPTER 7 To begin with, when we were at war with Spain, this great Churchill, "Churchill entered British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces and fired on the American forces. It was a little embarrassing when the Honorable William Langer of North Dakota made this announcement on the floor of the United States Senate. Mr. Churchill was in this country, because you know, we never hit a man behind his back, he was going to speak in Boston, a little more of the Churchillian propaganda. Learning that this statement had been made by the patriotic Senator Langer, Mr. Churchill was a little upset, he sent a telegram to the Honorable Tom Connally denying the fact. Good friend, as he was, Senator Connally rose to his feet and read the telegram to the Senate. Little did they realize that the records were available, that already these facts had been read to the Senate and were in the Congressional Record. Once again Senator Langer read the record to the Senate. In 1946, the Biographical Encyclopaedia of the World repeats: "Churchill entered British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces in Cuba." Robert's account of Winston Churchill, 1928, Robert H. Mc Bride, publishers, page 32, through Sir Henry Drummond, ambassador at Madrid, (Spain) Churchill:—He joined the Spanish forces in Cuba in 1895. Spain conferred the "Order of Military Merit, 1st class." Practical Objects:—To establish branches wherever the English language is spoken, with the view of promoting locally every movement which makes for the friendship of the English Speaking people. To extend the hand of welcome in every country to English Speaking visitors. To make the English peoples better known to each other by the interchange of visits, by correspondence, by the printed word and lectures, by an interchange of professors and preachers, by sporting contests and by any other means. To publish a magazine devoted to the cause of the English Speaking Union. To take every opportunity through the press and otherwise emphasizing the tradition and institutions possessed in common by the English Speaking peoples. The headquarters of the English Speaking Union to be in Washington, D. C. and London, England. It was at the Newspaper Conference that we first meet Churchill; from his address on this occasion we take the following excerpt:—"But this great struggle, this common cause, which enables us for the future to write our bistory together, has brought us into an association—I care not whether it is an association or alliance—into a comradeship begun in the consciousness of a common cause, pursued in faith to a high and an unchangeable ideal, and now flowing forward smoothly and swiftly in a genuine purpose of world wide welfare, which will enable the British and the American peoples to act together in the closest harmony and sympathy. The Press has played an extraordinary part in this war, at the outset rigorously excluded from even a public show of the military operations, but afterwards taking charge of the whole front. It is not possible to fight a great war like this except with a highly intelligent democracy, and it is not possible to act upon the consciousness of a highly intelligent democracy, except through the agency of a gigantic and innumerable press. We have owed to the Press of this Country a good many harsh criticisms and a good many rough turns, but in the main it has been the great vehicle which has expressed the national will, and it has been an indispensable element, I doubt not, in that marshalling of American strength which has enabled us to strike this decisive blow Perhaps the speech that caused most comment in this country was the one made at Fulton, Missouri, March 6, 1946. In this speech he called for "joint Anglo-American military and naval administration and even for COMMON CITIZENSHIP." Under what head Mr. Churchill, and would you, who loves the Empire, expect the American people to become part of that Empire? This plan of Mr. Churchill is not for the good of the United States or because Mr. Churchill has so great a love for this country. We will go into the plan of this control in a later chapter. It was all so fantastic and unbelievable that the Honorable Louis Ludlow of Indiana addressed a letter to the Prime Minister of Britain, the Honorable Clement Richard Attlee asking him if Mr. Churchill spoke for the British Government. This was on March 18, 1946, the reply came form This closed the incident so far as Mr. Ludlow was concerned but not so far as Mr. Churchill was concerned for again and again and again, he has agitated for, asked for the unity of the two countries. It is known to the British Library of Information and to the British Government and to the Crowned Heads, as we shall see in further references. Let us consider a few of the remarks of Churchill relative to the union of the two countries, his own words cannot be denied. In the report to the Polish Minister for Foreign Affairs, November 21, 1938 Count Jerzy Potocki, Polish Ambassador in Washington, in conversation with Mr. Bullitt in his office, then spoke about Britain's complete unpreparedness for war, and about the impossibility of adapting British industry to massed production, especially in regard to the manufacture of aeroplanes. He spoke with unusual enthusiasm about the French army, but confirmed my opinion that the French air force was antiquated. According to what military experts told Mr. Bullitt during the crisis in the autumn of 1938, a future war would last for at least six years and would, in their opinion, end in the total destruction of Europe and the establishment of Communism in every state. Without doubt Soviet Russia would stand to gain most when the war was over. (emphasis mine). The report on the international situation from Portugal to Warsaw tells us that Lt. Col. Chamberlain of the British Military, that he and the other younger members of the Staff agree that Germany and Italy are bluffing and that it is for us to begin the war and the soooner the better. They felt that right now they could count on the help of the United States. Meanwhile Britain was preparing for the conflict. It was Captain Gade of the American attache' who told me that "Our ideals are wholly in sympathy with those of the democracies! At the moment the United States are studying possibilities of speedy assistance for Britain and France. We have come to the conclusion that our assistance must not only, as in the Great War, begin with the active-cooperation of American troops after one year of the war has elapsed, but that 1000 aeroplanes must de dispatched within a week or ten days after war has broken out." Commander Gade is a man of great integrity and a personal friend of President Roosevelt's. Some will recall the late Honorable Senator Ernest Lundeen's words to the women who had assembled in Washington to appeal to the Congress against the Conscription Bill. He told us that," 1400 planes had already been sent to France. This was in 1940 when we were hearing again and again that our boys would not be sent to fight on foreign soil. That the Conscription Bill was merely a training bill." Training for what? At this time Soviet Russia was received and the matter discussed with M. Maisky, the Ambassador, by Lord Halifax, while the Prime Minister expressed the opinion that ideological difference did not matter in a question of this kind. What we are concerned with is our independence, and not alone our own independence but with that of all States that may be threatened by aggression. We, therefore welcome the assistance of any country, whatever may be its system of internal government, not in aggression but in resistance to aggression. Thus did Britain excuse her seeking an alliance with Soviet Russia. Sir John Simon answered the questions put to him during the debate in Parliament, on the question of a Four Power Pact against Germany with the remark, "Considering the peril in which the free countries of the world now stand we should be fools if we did not recognize where assistance might be drawn and gladly receive it." Climaxing this report the Polish Ambassador states, "Additional difficulty is created by the attitude of the Opposition and of a certain section of the Conservative Party, headed by Churchill, who are definitely planning for a war and regard Soviet Russia as a State with large reserves and potential military power. The difficulty with the Opposition may be increased by the attacks which the resolution to introduce compulsory military service has called forth, for the Government will take into account, and perhaps have to counter, arguments that an 'alliance' or some other form of connection with Russia might have prevented such a drastic decision." Now we come to the interview between our Ambassador at the Court of St. James, Mr. Joseph Kennedy with M. Jan Waselski, the Polish Commercial Counsellor, June 16, 1939. Mr. Biddle had notified Ambassador Kennedy of the arrival of the Commercial Counsellor and that he would call upon him. Mr. Kennedy discussed the fact that if the present situation continued, the Western Powers would be brought to the verge of bank- ruptcy. That even if there were no war during the current year, neither Great Britain nor the United States would discontinue or restrict their program of armaments. As a result Great Britain had already privately provided for currency restrictions, it was already impossible to invest British capital abroad, or to transfer it to other countries, without permission of that Government. Each day was bringing fresh difficulties and limitations." After a period of time, Mrs. Harrar wrote to Mrs. Wheeler on another matter, identifying herself as having sent the photostats. Following is Mrs. Wheeler's reply:— !\[\](\_page\_98\_Picture\_0.jpeg) During World War I, Richard H. Waldo told my husband of the propaganda to put this country into war because England had her back to the wall and the Morgan Loans had to be protected. In the Herald Tribune, April 29, 1939 is the news item of Mr. Waldo's speech to the New Jersey Hospital Association meeting, Hotel Ambassador, Atlantic City, N. J. Mr. Waldo said:— "Misinformation is coming from abroad through news channels to a greater extent than during and before the World War. We don't know what is really happening over there. We don't know, for example, that conscription in England is really for the purpose of internal control rather than aimed against the German Reich, where England has tremendous investments." "I am strongly in favor of a joint inquiry by the United States and Great Britain." adding—"As you probably know I am a Zionist from the beginning." Is Churchill so willing to set all peoples free, if so how can you account for his attitude toward Burma? Did he not say that the freeing of Burma would speed the decline of the British Empire? Had not Burma been shorn from the British Crown? We have held Burma, said Churchill, since 1886. I have always followed its affairs with attention, because my father had been responsible for its annexation." "Burma's occupation by the Japanese when the British and General Stilwell's Americans and Chinese were driven out was a great loss to the allies who needed its tin, manganese, silver, copper, oil and zinc, industrial materials that lie beside gold, rubies, sapphires and amber." "Since it's reconquest in which American air forces played a big role the country has operated under the British government, Governor Hubert Rouce." (Chicago Tribune, December 21, 1946) Churchill likewise said that, "for every keel laid down by Germany, Britain would lay down two." (Wooodrow Wilson, Disciple of Revolution) page 146. In the New York Times Magazine, January 4, 1953, Churchill is quoted as saying when he became leader of the Conservative Party:— "I have always served two public courses, which I think stand supreme—the maintenance of the enduring greatness of the British Empire and the historical continuity of our island life." While Eisenhower, accepting the freedom of the city in London, 1945, spoke to Churchill and an admiring throng of the 'common values, rights and hope of these SISTERS UNDER THE SKIES OF BRITAIN AND AMERICA." How different! Churchill thinking of his country and its greatness, while General Eisenhower became the "internationalist." Does he not know that we are not sister nations in any sense of the word? Churchill called on Eisenhower at Shape, December 1951, eleven months later he cabled the General congratulations on his election and expressed the desire to renew past relations for peace and freedom. This week, January 4, 1953 Eisenhower welcomes his old friend and Churchill's last visit to the United States paid off. When told over the telephone that Lend Lease had passed, it is reliably reported, his remark was: "Thanks Uncle Sucker." Yes, Mr. Churchill wants lasting peace, but is it not a peace in which the British will dominate the world? It is now 1954 and we find Mr. Churchill in quite a reverse position, trade to England today is necessary, they would like this country to put their seal of approval on Britain's trade with Soviet Russia, they would like us to recognize "Red" China for the same reason. What does the life of an American boy mean to the British? Trade is the Alpha and the Omega to the British. How can you account for the fact, as appeared in the New York News of April 19, 1944, under the caption "Communists Peril G. O. P. Parley, Mc Cormick Warns," I quote:— "Communists dominate the government, he (Col. Mc Cormick) asserted, because four hundred odd thousand of them, have held the balance of power in New York State and New York State has the largest vote in the Electoral College." "My friend, Winston Churchill suggested to the Republican conference at Mackinac, with the approval of President Conant of Harvard and apparently of President Rooosevelt, that WE REPEAL THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND RE-ENTER THE BRITISH EMPIRE AS LOWER CLASS SUBJECTS OF THE BRITISH CROWN." (emphasis authors) Still quoting from this article:—"That very acute thinker, Mr. Winston Churchill, once said that with all their failings the Anglo-Saxon race, or English Speaking people, have three marked characteristics—a love of freedom of fair play, and of some consideration for the unfortunate.".... The dictionary gives Dictator—one who has absolute power In the pamphlet "Armageddon is at the Door" by A. J. Ferris, England, of which there have been eight editions from 1933 to 1942 we find on page 32, the following:—"Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered \*together\*, and appoint themselves ONE HEAD..." I will make them one nation, they shall be no more two nations." On page 50 we find also:—"The reference here is to the Russian destruction of Germany and Italy, and the Communization of Continental Europe. God will allow the Russians, as His instrument, to destroy, "Babylon" but to go no further. (By Babylon is meant the Roman Catholic Church). This would suggest a period of peace after the present war, before the final clash in Palestine for world dominion." Again let us turn to page 16 of the pamphlet, "When Russia Bombs Germany" and note that this is the seventh edition and the date of the post-script to Chapter (2) added to the fourth edition, is October 15, 1941. Let me also remind you the the now famous code of Pearl Harbor was 'EAST WIND' and that on this one page alone those words EAST WIND appear in capital letters four times. Did Britain know of this code, why was it always suppressed in the investigations? Was it part of Churchill's prayer, dream and hope that the United States would be forced into the war on her side? # CHAPTER 8 The Four Horsemen ride again. These four men, Burton, Ball, Hill and Hatch were members of the United States Senate. Knowing that this would involve us in increased debt, which Mr. Ball acknowledged could only be paid by taxations and taxation would fall on personal incomes, Mr. Ball went even further in his ad nissions. He admitted that "this revenue could not be obtained in the higher brackets but would fall on the middle brackets, from \\$3000.00 to \\$100.000.00. Corporation taxes, he said, would probably be increased to the point where no BUSINESS IS GOING TO MAKE A PROFIT out of the defense. Some of them will be lucky if they do not wind up owing the government money." Mr. Ball thought housewives, laborers, business and professional workers will have to show real patriotism for the problems ahead. It did not According to the New York Journal-American, October 18, 1943, Senator Capper (Kansas) warned that this Burton, Ball, Hill and Hatch Bill would endanger our control. There was opposition to the internationalists who felt that the hands of the President should be unfettered by Congress, for only through this plan can the United States be taken into a league controlling all the actions of all the peoples of the world. This international group does not want the United States Senate to have any voice in whether or not this treaty or commitment made by the Executive shall go into effect. They want blanket powers for the President to commit the United States to an 'organization of United Nations.' Senator Reed:—"If ever I help to set up a force great enough to destroy my country, I hope Almighty God will strike me dead before I consummate the crime." # CHAPTER 9 # PROPAGANDA What was the purpose of this special edition of the Times, July 4, 1919? Under the Caption:—'The Insurance of Peace'. 'The greatest thing in the World. A Matter of Business? (from a correspondent) we read:— # A COMMERCIAL MATTER # NEED OF PROPAGANDA "What is needed-urgently needed—is to make a beginning. Efficiently organized propaganda should mobolize the press, the Church, the stage and the cinema, press into active service the whole educational systems of both countries, and root the spirit of good-will in the homes, the universities, public and high schools and primary schools. It should also provide for subsidizing the best men to write books and articles on special subjects, to be published in cheap editions or distributed free to classes interested. Authoritative opinion upon current controversial topics should be prepared both for the daily press and for magazines; bistories and text books upon literature should be revised. New books should be added, particularly in the primary schools. Hundreds of exchange university scholarships should be provided. Local societies should be formed in every center to foster British-American good-will, in close co-operation with an administrative committee. Important articles should be broken up into mouthfuls for popular consumption, and booklets, cadres, pamphlets distributed through organized channels to the public. Advertising space should be taken in the press, on the bill boards and in the street cars for steadily presenting terse, easily read and remembered mind compelling phrases and easily grasped cartoons, that the public may sub-consciously absorb the fundamentals of a complete mutual understanding. This work cannot be efficiently done by individuals or by small independent societies. It must be co-ordinated into one great, steady efficient effort, and the execution of it be under the direction of men in both countries who are qualified by capacity and experience to sound exactly the right note and to employ the right media to interest the section of the public to which an appeal is made." The whole expense for carrying out this enterprise in both countries should immediately be budgeted for and the necessary funds assured, to be administered by one strong administrative committee of eminent men in the United States and the United Kingdom. These two committees should be co-ordinated into one international supervisory committee. Literary matter should be secured by sub-committees of British and American journalists and publishers who know the capacity of all of those writers competent to assist in the work of interpreting one country to the other, to establish the mutuality of British-American international interest, and to impress the entire public opinion of both countries with the advantage, nay the necessity for a world wide unity peace accord. Ambassadors of good-will should be exchanged, to meet the public in our pulpits, on our lecture platforms and to preside in the lecture rooms of our colleges." # LET US BE PRACTICAL "It is up to us to ensure the LEAGUE OF NATIONS, to put vitality into a declaration of principles. Only English speaking peoples can make the League a compelling force to preserve peace and to re-establish world wide social security." end of quote. This, then is propaganda, propaganda for Britain and America to unite as a force to keep the peace,, power politics in every sense of the word. Is this not what we are hearing today, over the radio, in the press and the television as well as in the pulpit, morning, noon and night? The need of co-operation, the unity of Britain and America to keep the peace of the world. But would such a union maintain the peace unless it be by force, and peace by force is not peace. Is this the reason for the World Police of which we hear so much? Are American boys willing to spend the best years of their lives policing the world when they should be establishing themselves for normal living? From the London Times, the same issue, came these words from Nicholas Murray Butler:—"After the experiences of the last five years nothing seems to me more clear than that the world desperately needs, for its leadership, its guidance and its safety precisely those qualities of mind and character, which are known in modern history as Anglo-Saxon. It is the extraordinary persisetence of the Anglo-Saxon impulse which brought America into existence. It is this impluse which found expression in the early colonial life of America and which gives form in the Mayflower Compact of 1620, ot the Declaration of Rights of 1675, to the Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of taking up arms in 1776, to the Declaration of Independence of 1776, to the Ordinance for the Government of the North Western Territory of 1787, and finally to the Constitution of the United States itself. This Anglo-Saxon impulse persists to this day and is the underlying and controlling fact in American life. It had furnished the warp through which the shuttle of time and change has carried the threads which make American history. Despite the large Irish, German, Slavic, Italian, Scandinavian and Jewish additions to the original American population, the Anglo-Saxon impluse holds its own. In America it is repeating, on a larger scale, the history of England, and it is drawing to itself support and strength from the other and varied nationalities that are here joined to it. The English overrules the immigrant's native tongue, if anot in the first generation, certainly in the second, and the English Common Law with its statutory amendments and additions, replaces the immigrant's customs of life and trade with a rapidity that is truly astonishing. This impulse is also at work in the Dominion of Canada, in the Commonwealth of Australia, in New Zealand and now in the Union of South Africa. Despite its long and dominating history, it still retains vast resources of power for political and It was at the annual dinner in 1931 that Nicholas Murray Butler states: "I would like to see the Balkan Union, the Asiatic Combine, the Pan "The American University Union in Europe, as its title implies is more than an Anglo-American Society. It was organized in 1917 almost as soon as the United States entered the war, and has been sustained by more than one hundred and fifty of the Universities in the United States. The Founders with large vision set forth not only the care of the college men and their friends in the Army during the war, but also, to serve as a bond between the universities of America and those of European nations, especially by encouraging the attendance and advancing the welfare of American students at the representative universities of France, Great Britain and Italy. The potential league of universities was to prepare for leadership in a possible League of Nations." There can be no question of the purpose of this propaganda, but can you honestly say, that peace in the world can be effected by the domination of the English Speaking peoples, will the rest of the world submit to this? Beware, America, lest you find yourself the catspaw in this world intrigue. # CANADA'S DESTINY "British Federation would leave Britain as a member of the smaller part of her own race, and out of the main channel of progress; instead of sitting (with race imperialism accomplished) enthroned as the Mother among hundreds of millions of her own children, composing all but a fraction of English speaking men. Hence he abandoned the scheme and thereafter favored RACE FEDERATION, and left to America more scholarships than to all other lands. He saw that it was to the Republic, not to British settlements, his country had to look for the coming reunion of his race, with Britain in her rightful place as parent of all. A few figures will leave no room for dispute about this. In the last decade 1890-1900, Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand combined, added to their population 4,500,000—America 13,500,000. Canada only added 508,000. The Commonwealth of Australasia only 660,000. In the four years since 1900 America added more than the total population of either Canada or Australasia. During the present decade, 1900-1910, at the same rate of increase to date, she will add more than the present total white population of Canada, Australasia, New Zealand, and South Africa combined. So fast does the Republic grow, so slowly the Empire." "The United Kingdom itself increased last decade more than three times as much as Canada and Australia combined. It is not to her Colonies, therefore that Britain can look for much increase of population or of TRADE. The growth of Australia, small as it was in the last decade, so far as reported in this decade is even less. Canada is growing faster only in the far North West, which is separated by a thousand miles of barren land from the English speaking province of Ontario. Last decade Ontario Province (English) actually declined in British population; Quebec Province (French) slightly increased. The census of 1900 shows fewer British-born residents in all Canada than that of 1890. The wheat fields now reached by rail are being settled by Americans who cross the border, selling their "When we come to the population of the United Kingdom, we find already in England and Wales 558 to the square mile. What thoughtful man could wish further increase, even if it were possible? A denser population must cause deterioration. The density of population in England and Wales is not reached by any European country except the small state of Belgium. France has only 188, Germany 270, (or one half) Italy 293, Japan has only 296. The authorities agree that England and Wales are fully populated, Ireland proves that it is so by the small increase. Scotland has increased steadily for some decades, but little scope is left for further increase. Substantially, Ireland and Scotland have today all they can maintain in comfort." # DUVCICALLY IMPOCCIBLE "What will Britain do? The day is coming when Britain will have to decide on one of three courses. First, shall she sink — comparatively to the giant consolidations — —into a third or forth rate power — a Holland or Belgium comparatively? Here note that we do not postulate her actual decline, but the increased growth of other powers, or second, shall she consolidate with a European giant? Or, third, shall she grasp the outstretched hand of her children in America and become again as she was before, the Mother member of the English Speaking Race?" Here we have the unvarnished truth, Mr. Carnegie seems to have forgotten that in 1893 in his book, "Triumphant Democracy," he told us, "that the industry of England was sorely depressed, that reunion would free the markets of all its members to each other. The question cannot even be discussed when Imperial Conferences meet. If it be introduced it is judicially shelved. But a British-American Reunion brings free entry here of all British products as a matter of course. The richest market in the world is opened to Britain free of all duty by a stroke of the pen. No tax can be laid upon products of any part of the Union even for revenue, although under free trade such taxes might still exist. What would not trade with the Republic duty free mean to the linen, woolen, iron and steel industries of Scotland: to the tinplate manufactures of Wales; to the woolen and cotton, coal, iron, cutlery and steel industries of England? It would mean prosperity to every industry in the United Kingdom, and this in turn would mean renewed prosperity to the agricultural interests now so sorely depressed." "Few except those engaged in manufacturing realize the position of Britain as a manufacturer in regard to the American market. The ocean, which so many are still apt to consider a barrier between the two countries, is the very agency which brings them so close and will ultimately bind them together. Coal, iron, steel and all kinds of merchandise reach American ports more cheaply than American manufacturers produced within a hundred miles of these ports . . . In the event of reunion the American manufacturers would supply the interior of the country, but the great populations skirting the Atlantic seaboard and the Pacific coast would receive their manufactured articles chiefly from Britain. The heavy products are taken from Britain to the United States in many instances as ballast for nothing . . ." (Triumphant Democracy 1893) Have you followed the record, have you noted that Britons have come to our shores; King George and Queen Elizabeth came in 1938, they were interested in having the support of this country for the war they knew was coming; we are soon to have the Queen Mother, probably later the Queen herself, another war is in the offing; and we have had the Lords and the Ladies, and the Dukes and the Sirs and the Knights of the Garter, maybe there may yet be a Knight of the Suspenders who will come; what did they want, money of course, for they had the tin cup in hand; maybe it was cancelling of the debts; maybe it was another loan; some form of a league of nations, or a world government, or free trade, no tariff. Free trade is very much in the air at the moment. Let us look at the Randall Committee which has made recommendation to President Eisenhower for lower tariffs, and extending the reciprocal tariffs for three more years with power to reduce this tariff five (5) precent each year. Did you know that Mr. Randall is President of the Inland Steel but that Mr. Randall's Superior in that company is Edward Ryerson, a Carnegie Trustee? Did you know that Mr. Eisenhower was also a Carnegie Trustee, he resigned, I believe when he went into the White House? Did you know that John Foster Dulles has been a Trustee of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace for years and also a Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation, which, according to the 1934 year book of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, found it was doing the same work so they joined forces? Do not forget that Mr. Eisenhower told us January 16, 1951 that he had been 50% British and 50% American and that now he was 1/12 American. Don't you think the President of the United States should be 100% American? Under such a plan as set forth by Mr. Carnegie do you think our factories will be operating, do you think American men will be employed, do you know under the plan of world cartels that it is planned to manu- # Flying Colors !\[\](\_page\_121\_Figure\_2.jpeg) facture in the country where labor is the cheapest? An interesting program of the plan of world cartels can be found in the book "England's Service" by Sarpedon, London 1941, here they tell us how all this will be managed from England, that because they control the insurance, the ships for carrying the trade of the world, and have been the financial center with the "know how," London is the place where all the products of the world should be cleared. Interesting, too, where they tell us that THEY WILL MANAGE FOR THE AMERICAN BUSINESS MAN WIHILE HE GOES OUT TO PLAY GOLF, how long does the American business man think he will have his business, not long he may be assured! (emphasis mine) by saying that there should be an Anglo-American alliance and even hinted at a common Citizenship. Should Britain allot everything to exports she will block the flow of free trade, that is multilateral trade. And so, they would have this country, England, work politically and economically with the United States. The answer to this lies in the hands of the American public, to the men of America let me say, American men have always been proud to see their wives and children well groomed and gowned, American men have always wanted the best in education for their children, they have wanted for them health and a full life. Do you, men of America, think you can destroy the sovereignty of this country, do you think you can place the destiny of the United States under the control of others and have the guaranteed security as it now is under our Constitution and Bill of Rights? Are you willing to sacrifice this country to salvage the British Commonwealth of the world, where alien forces can dictate what we shall do, how we shall educate our children, where we shall live? The choice lies before you. Tomorrow will be too late # CARNEGIE BOYS AND THEIR PROPAGANDA History records that the industrial situation in England was in sad straits in the year 1910-1911. Something had to be done about it, Lord Asquith foresaw a war in the offing, Winston Churchill was offered the post of First Lord of the Admiralty, which he accepted. Miss Lillian Scott Troy an American journalist was in England, clever woman, as she is, with a deep and abiding love for this country and its Constitution learned what she had never dreamed could happen. Writing an article under the Caption 'The Benedict Arnold Peace Society' she sent the article to the press in this country, one paper, the patriotic San Francisco Leader, San Francisco, California printed it. Here is the story:— "When English sneer, they hate, when they hate, they hate forever. Why this sudden change? Carnegie's money? No . . . His libraries, hero funds etc? No . . . His ambition? Yes . . ." "Ambition! Mad ambition! the ambition of Scotch pride." Since the visit of King Edward to Skibo Castle in Scotland, a new germ of ambition has been sown in the mind and soul of the Scotsman. On that memorable day, when he was honored by the King of England, a flag floated over Skibo Castle, which showed the Stars and Stripes on one side and the British flag on the other. As the King was leaving the castle, after offering Carnegie a dukedom-on terms, the baird of the castle is said to have raised his hand to the flag and exclaimed subjectively, 'Your majesty entered Skibo Castle under the American flag, and the British flag flies over your Majesty as you leave. May there be only one flag over Skibo Castle when your Majesty deigns to enter again and may that flag be the British flag. And may it also float over the United States from the Atlantic to the Pacific." "This sudden haste about arbitration was unwittingly brought about by the impending war between England and Germany. Carnegie was forced on against his will and more farsighted judgment to bring about a working 'entente' with the United States before Germany made any hostile move against England. In fact, the United States were to be held over the head of their friend Germany in the shape of a 'big stick' by England." "If the little 'feeler' passes unchallenged in America, the intended end would have been accomplished; if exception were taken as to how and for whom we Americans were willing to shed every drop of our blood—there was Sims to be the scapegoat." "The bragging, boasting and bluffing went merrily on but Great Britain immediately began to look around for crutches and a cane. She made an alliance with Japan, Germany minded her own business and sawed wood. She made an 'entente' with her old bitter enemy France, Germany continued to saw wood, and work. She made an alliance with Russia, and then triumphantly began to insult Germany. She made demands on Germany; commanded her to cease increasing her navy; Germany quietly told Great Britain that her armaments would increase in the ratio of Great Britain's hostile alliances. England tried bluffing, and got her bluff nearly called. Germany said she was ready to take her chances with the quartette of England, Japan, France and Russia; but politely added that she much preferred to work and increase the prosperity and happiness of her people; but. . . . If Great Britain wished to have a little fracas . . . . 'Barkus was willing.'" "Then the canny Scot, the clever organizer, came to the United States on mischief bent. He tickled President Taft under the ribs and cooed something into his ear . . . Several things. And out of a clear sky "our" President—all by himself (?) holds out the glad hand to England and says, 'Let us arbitrate'" "The Duchess of Marlborough was insulted before the world at the Coronation. Why? Because she was a hated Yankee." "It is quite safe to say that the only Americans who are treated by the English royalties as if they were human beings are the numerous relatives of Ambassador Reid. Not that Reids are supposed to be in any degree more eligible than any other American family, but because Mr. Reid is and may be very useful in furthering the Arbitration Treaty — and a few other things." "The English newspapers made much of Ambassador Reid's anti-American speech. Many were the gloating references made to the effect that even the American Ambassador could not stand his own people. And why, may the American people consistently ask, why should references to the United States as God's Country exasperate Mr. Whitelaw Reid to such an extent that he must select Thanksgiving Day, of all days, to criticize at a public dinner our warm hearted and truthful references to our own country? As to the American women he holds in such contempt for endeavoring to 'intrude' their republican presence on English royalty, why should they not, if they wish to and royalty wants their money to save the disintegrating nobility? Can Mr. Reid with all his close experience of royalty, begin to compare any royal house in the world with even the average American family? No. Can he compare any of the royal women with Americaan women in refinement, courtesy, genuine kindness, brains, wit or honorable pride and virtue? No doubt the United States Ambassador, knowing the distaste the English King and Queen have for Americans, would turn it to account by barring out all but his numerous family and family-in-law from the sensitive royal presence. One has only to glance casually at the picture of the group of guests at Ambassador Reid's country house in England where King Edward is seen sitting close to D. C. Mills, Mr. Reid's father-in-law, to observe the angry and disgusted expression on His Majesty's face at being roped in so neatly and being obliged to sit and have his royal face and figure taken with that d-----d old nobody, Mills." "The first seeds of hate for America are sworn in the young student's mind by a cruelly calumnious attack upon George Washington. George "Intoxicated with what appeared to them as signs of success in the great Peace, there are a few whose loquacity, whose brag of American dependence is more fluent than their silence. Hence this article." "John Hays Hammond is in favor of "Peace" too. Our President commented most kindly on the warm reception accorded Mr. Hammond at the coronation last June." "Many reputable citizens whose patriotism was unquestioned were misled into taking an active interest in public demonstrations in favor of the special brand of "buncom" called Carnegie "Peace". The chief aim and object of getting prominent names associated with Mr. Carnegie's scheme was partially successful for a short period but now the eyes of the deceived are widely opened to the full and complete campaign of treachery launched against the United States in Skibo Castle." "The following is what a few very ambitious but traitorous Americans in high positions could tell us if they would, and to which policies they have either pledged their wealth, their brains or their influence. Many of these "As far as can be ascertained the following are the guidance rules laid down for the accomplishment of this society which we can make no mistake in calling the "Benedict Arnold Peace Society." "1. Power of the President of the United States to be increased so as to gradually diminish the powers of Congress." - "7. On accomplishment of same British and American naval officers must be mutually exchanged, but care must be taken that this suggestion is made by an American." - "8. Quietly and unobtrusively American soldiers must be sent to Egypt and India; British soldiers may then be quartered in the United States." - 9". English royalty, preferably the Duke and Duchess of Connaught must be sent to Canada, from whence they must make frequent trips to New York. But great care must be taken not to enter Washington if there is a demonstration against them, or until they have practically "held court" in New York." - "10. The wives and daughters of men controlling great wealth and influence in America must be given preference at these "courts". They must be carefully selected from every State and Territory in the United States. Thus a new "society" through royal favor, must quietly and expeditiously be created." - "11. Honors must be conferred on the husbands of women thus given preference in the social circles of America and a rank or position determined by judiciously distributed decoration." at the apex of consummation." - "22. Arbration, offensive or defensive alliances, and finally "Peace", must be brought about as quickly as possible. For the latter armed expulsion may be necessary, and it is recommended that the Indian and British troops be altogether confined to the east of America, leaving the protection of the west to the Japansese troops, 80,000 of which are already scattered throughout the Sandwich Islands, Mexico, British Columbia and California. Reciprocity with Canada can be passed almost unanimously through the American Congress, and then opposed bitterly in Canada on one ground only—that of annexation by the United States. Simultaneously with the rejection of reciprocity by the Canadian people a member of the British Royal Family, preferably the Duke of Connaught, must take up his residence in Canada." "In these few words Lt. Col. Lowther has embodied two shots for the bird; Firstly, the flooding of the United States with cheap coolie labor will reduce wages, thus gradually making it more difficult for the man in ordinary circumstances to spare enough money to support his children during the time they should be in school and thereby making it necessary for childrens' education to be reduced to the level of the children of the poor in England, which would tend in a very short time to make a sharp class distinction, or "illiterate rabble". This later class is regarded as very desirable in England, as the more ignorant the "lower Classes" the more easily they are controlled." military secretary and official mouthpiece; therefore let no one discount his set idea of what our policy with the Phillipines should be; a man so strictly trained in the policy and diplomacy of his government speaks with authority FROM HIS KING AND GOVERNMENT." "Simultaneously with the publication of the British officer's book depicting Americans as a lot of wholesale murderers, devoid of the slightest honor or courage, and comparing them detrimentially to the gentlemen he had known in the Pall Mall, he was scattering broadcast in New York and Washington his hypocritical expression of admiration for the great republic and the American people". His comparison of the Canadian soldier to the United States soldier. In fact EVERY REFERENCE TO ANYTHING OR ANYBODY IN AMERICA IS TEEMING WITH CONTEMPT AND BITTERNESS. Even the clubs in the United States, which received him with open hearted hospitality, he refers to with sneering contempt, and, to be accurate, one must say that many of his statements regarding the people whose bread he broke are devoid of the merits of truth." Even A. Maurice Low, an Englishman, who has lived in the United States for twenty years, tells his countrymen the following in his book on America: extracts from a book written by an Englishman during the last term of the ex-president of the White House. While the actual literary merits of this book may be nil, the long and complicated sentences obscure and badly constructed, and its syntax amateurish, nevertheless its purpose and its veiled meaning is as clear as crystal. Every page of this book shows malice; every paragraph venom. When I first began to read this book on the recommendation of another English writer that I would find out some truths about my own country I naturally supposed the publication to be some sort of 'freak' idea; but on closer investigation of all books written by Englishmen about the United States, I found that nearly all these books contained far fetched lies and calumnies written with pens that were steeped in bitter jealousy, detestation and hatred. AMERICANS WHO FAVOR CARNEGIE PEACE WILL DO WELL TO READ 'AMERICA'S PERIL'. The 'Y' is intended to mean Yankee. This book is intensely popular in England, no less a personage than the late King Edward finding it the best book on the 'Yankee' he has ever read. The author is almost a hero. You had better make up your minds to read some things which you will find real 'Nawsty'. (Following are a few printable extracts from this book.) men of America are of the ladylike type. Men in America are effeminate looking. They are a mixture of poodle dog and girl." "The English writers of books, and those who write for the press, have attacked and calumniated for generations, but they have left the virtue of our women unassailed until of late years. Where one heard a grudging complaint paid to the virtue of our women, now we hear the most cruel and untruthful aspersions cast upon them individually and collectively. There is no use to remonstrate they will tell that several English writers who visited the States have written in their books that the American woman is simply rotten, and they ought to know. The English are more like sheep than lions; they herd close together in their opinions, which they do not generally form for themselves and when the leader of the flock says Bah, they all say Bah-Bah. If he says Boo they all say Boo-Boo together. They read "Y", Americas Peril because the King read it. They like it for the same reason he liked it because it slammed it to the yankee upstarts." He says, "THE DOLLAR IS DIRTY IN THE WEST. IT IS POS-ITIVELY FILTHY IN THE EAST, BOTH METAPHORICALLY AND ACTUALLY." "He says that he apostrophied a negro thus "Aye whiter than you Yankee, except for about a hundredth of an inch, WHITER THAN YOU." "He says that Dewey was confused as to what to do in the battle and signaled Seymour who from the British Flagship directed the American admiral how to proceed, signaling, "Fire your port broadsides," and in reference to one Spanish ship Admiral Seymour directed Admiral Dewey not to fire but to "blow her out of the water." "This book, which so pleased the King, and which was read so widely in England, did not miss its mark, the ever growing tendency of the English public to accept as final the absorption of America by Great Britain would be a matter of a few years." Land of Greasy Food. But these British plans for the peaceful or militant absorption of the United States, with the assistance of Andrew Carnegie's executive ability and money the treason of members of the "BENEDICT ARNOLD PEACE SOCIETY", and the willing cooperation of the re-writers of the History of the United States, have gone sadly amuck on account of the threatened war between England and Germany. The matter of the arbitration treaty with England has been unduly and indecently rushed, much to Mr. Carnegie's displeasure; this indelicate haste was caused by the hysterical announcement of Lord Charles Beresford, the hero of many a naval parade, that the British Navy was not what it seemed; that the Navy was without officers, without men, without the necessary units; and in the event of war with Germany the BRITISH NAVY WOULD BE A PRESENT TO THE ENEMY." Plans for the peaceful, or otherwise absorption of the United States were overwhelmed with the fear that Germany would give unto herself a Present of the British Navy, and possibly even more. While the plans of "CARNEGIAN PEACE" were not scheduled to be ripe for a test until 1915, the fear of war with GERMANY in the immediate present forced the issue with such a feverish haste that more than one cat was let out of the bag of diplomacy. England could not tax her people any heavier than she was taxing them, and even if she had the necessary funds at her command to build a Navy that could compare with Germany's, she DID NOT HAVE TIME." Germany was ready to spring, and England had little faith in the French and Russian navies combined against the German Navy; she dare not expect the Japanese navy to fight ship to ship with the Russian navy, for fear they might remember old scores and forget they were fighting for England and turn their guns upon each other." "From the Soudan to London, Theodore Roosevelt hurrahed for England; in Egypt he told a patriotic and brave people to be "loyal" to the British Government he said English rule in India was GREAT! ASK THE INDIANS ASK THE EGYPTIANS. . . . and you might also ask Mr. Morgan Shuster, HANDS OFF." Point by point - 2. Surely there was the attempt to revise the Supreme Court, we may indeed be grateful that the packing did not go through. - 4. We are seeing these things going on, in fact it has been described as "our Senators being on the tread mill getting nowhere". men call themselves Americans. Even the President wears these insignia when he attends their functions, a recent one: Greece. And now we go to a letter from Miss Troy, September 20, 1941, in which she writes: "When you look back and read these points, you will understand how, at that remote period they looked to me like a hoax; and I would not have given them a thought but for the authentic source. I do not know of another journalist in London who would have touched them at all—so wild did they appear. But, as you read them today, you will agree that most of them have come to pass, even to the sending away of our armed forces to distant lands; and the planned war against Germany. This is quite a story in itself, and unless one knows of it the points cannot be exactly clear in all their aspects . . . . " Miss Troy continues:—"When I first had them in 1909—I was so uncertain of their authenticity, in spite of their source, that I spoke of them to a friend, the late William T. Stead, my dearest friend in London, and editor of the English Review of Reviews. He implored me not to publish them, pointing out how 'absurd they were' and laughing at the one which relates "To confirm this you can ask for the London edition of Who's Who of 1919, and you will find the words "Sir John Pershing, Sir Admiral Rodman, Sir James W. Gerard and some others. Then look in the New York edition of the very same publications for 1919 and you will find the titles left out altogether. It is interesting to know that Queen Elizabeth on April 12, 1953, appointed John W. Davis an honorary Knight Grand Cross of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire. The British Embassy said this was the highest rank of the order, which was instituted in 1917, and was the highest civilian distinction the Oueen could bestow on a United States citizen. "Ancient bitterness:—This pleasantry is truer than it sounds, George the Third is more alive with us than with you. You have had several Monarchs since him, you see, but he was our latest. IT IS OUR SCHOOL HISTORIES THAT HAVE BEEN KEEPING HIS MEMORY GREEN. (emphasis mine). Don't blame them too much. Let me tell you why. We were weak and young. We had not long broken away from you. We had to make out our case. Now our case, once you go into the original document, was not over strong. The truth of it was, you had been driving us colonies with such light reins for so long that directly you tightened them we took the bit in our teeth and bolted. We meant to be our own nation and not your colonies no matter how easy with us you might be. And you were easy, very easy, until quite late in the Revolution. So our school histories had to make out a case. They played up George the Third and Lord North strong, and they suppressed Burke and Pitt and the whole liberal element in England that was in sympathy with us; thought of us as free British brothers over the water who were insisting on our British rights, they painted a distorted picture of England's political picture at that time." INFLUENCE OF SCHOOL BOOKS: Generations of American school-boys have studied this picture. To fathers and grandfathers all over our States, the names Concord, Bunker Hill, Valley Forge, mean resistance to the tyrannical enemy of liberty, England. England is still that to our schoolboys of today, though not to so many. A MOVEMENT TO CORRECT THE SCHOOL BOOKS HAS BEEN STARTED AND WILL GO ON. (emphasis mine). It will be thwarted in every possible way by certain of your enemies. These will busily remind you that you burnt our Capitol in the next war we had; that you let loose the Alabama upon us during our Civil War; they will never mention the good turns you have done us. They would spoil, if they could, the better understanding that so many of us are striving for. They would pry us apart if they could. They will fail. Our dead over whom you strewed flowers on May 30th will help us living to defeat them. . . . . " About this time Progressive education came to the front, it started in Washington, D.C. 1918. One of the 'trial' schools was at Columbia University. With this system the child did not have a regular curriculum, the child did what it wanted to do. Were United States histories rewritten? The situation became so serious, the children's minds were being so poisoned against those who had fought and bled that this nation might be free, that Mr. Charles Grant Miller brought the situation to the attention of the patriots of this country; among them the American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars; National Sons of the American Revolution; The Star Spangled Banner Association; Pan-American Student League, National Association for Advancement of the Colored People; Military Order of Foreign Wars. There were but two who appeared in opposition, two who were willing to go along with the 'Un-American' text books; Francis M. Kinnicut, member Advisory Board of the English Speaking Union, and M. Telfair Minton, The Loyal Coalition. It would seem that some of these patriots have fallen by the wayside. Be that as it may, this investigation held in New York City in 1923 did succeed in bringing about some re-vision of the text books which were such an affront to all decent Americans In making his report to Mayor John F. Hylan, Mr. David Hirschfield stated that "standard American school histories have been largely supplanted by eight texts recently revised, so far as they relate to the War of the Revolution, the War of 1812, and other Anglo-American differences." "That such patriots as Samuel Adams, John Hancock and Patrick Henry were mere disreputable characters;" "That Thomas Jefferson deserved a halter:" "That the United States Constitution and most of our free institutions were borrowed from England;" "That the War of 1812 was a 'mistake', 'disgraceful' and 'unfortunate';" "That the North saved the Union only through England's heroic support;" "That our country's history has been 'hitherto distorted through unthinking adherence to national prejudice;" tood and clothing. What care these tools of the British Empire? What care these men that Paymaster General William Palfrey, Colonel, gentleman, and patriot wrote to General Washington pleading for two hundred dollars to save this country, and these men were described as disreputable characters, that they deserved a halter. "In my attack on the Muzzey history in my home city, Portland, Oregan, I was unable to get anywhere in that jurisdiction until we got rid of a school superintendent who was too friendly with Ginn & Co. the publishers of the book, to be willing even to consider its displacement." The aim seems to be to discredit everything American, the men of the Revolution are not here to defend themselves; they are not here to tell the youth the truth; they are not here to plead for the sovereignty of this country. This, the living patriots must do, they fought to save this country that you might be free; we have had the blessings for over a hundred years of a Constitution and a Bill of Rights that did protect us. It was only when the Internationalists and the Foundations got control that we were and are in jeopardy. What are your children being taught today, not American history, but world history, that they are World citizens not that they are American citizens. Do not blame the youth of this country, the blame rests squarely with the older generations who have allowed this thing to happen. We have been lax in making our Representatives in Washington respect and live up to their Oath of Office, the time has come when you can no longer sweep the dirt under the rug, the time is here when we must roll back the rug and Then we come to that part of the report where the patriots were heard, Charles Grant Miller, who had been instrumental in bringing this situation to the front is quoted as saying in his testimony: "The history that truthfully reports our nation's annals in such a sympathetic, virile, patriotic spirit as to inculcate in our children pride in the birth and development of our republic, honor to its heroes, devotion to its principles and progress, and zest in its ideals and purposes, this is a true history. But the history that creeps along the verge of falsehood; alien in spirit, snarling in self defense that is not actually untrue, and inoculating the children with suspicion of the nations founders, doubt as to its cardinal principles and indifference to its domestic ideals, that history is false." "Elihu Root, Chairman of the Carnegie Council, illustrates at once this directness of connection, and the completeness of design of the super power." "Andrew Carnegie was another Britisher through and through, who could dream grandly and had the power to make his dreams come true. He endowed the multiform Carnegie institutions from motives which he never sought to conceal. His fondest dream was to bring about a "reunited State, The British American Union" "Attention is directed to the old charge that the study of the American Revolution in our schools tends to promote an Anti British state of mind. It is a natural reaction to demand revision of our text-books with a view to the cultivation of a Pro British state of mind; and that reaction is now actually in evidence." "Other influences, according to Sir Gilbert Parker, professional British propagandist, here since the war (World War I) broke out, are a weekly "That many Americans regret the War of 1812 as most Britishers regret the acts of George III." "That it was the British Foreign Minister Canning who gave us the Monroe Doctrine and made it an accepted fact." "And that, next to Great Britain, the best friend the United States has is Japan." Ten of our school historians promptly began repeating to American school children these new theories which Sir Gilbert has frankly boasted as his official British propaganda." "Jerusalem" by Blake. The founder of this Magna Carta organization was J. W. Hamilton, 813 Fuller Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota, and the Rt. Rev. Frank A. McElwain, Evanston, Illinois, President. Mrs. Josephine Dodge Daskam Bacon of New York City, the author of, "The Processional of the Seven Nations" which she recommends should be sung in all Sunday Schools and Public Schools:— Great God of all Nations, We, sons of one speech, Pray now for the wisdom Thou only canst teach, So strengthened in union, So weakened apart, Thou gavest one tongue, Lord— Oh, give us one heart. One Charter confirmed us, One scripture we knew, One Bard is our glory, All history through. Now grant us one vision, Now show us one goal. Thou gavest one tongue, Lord— Oh, give us one Soul. Now, shoulder to shoulder Hand reaching to hand What Traitor shall part us? What foe shall withstand? What cannon shall thunder, Our voice cannot still? Thou gavest one tongue, Lord— Oh, give us one Will. The experimental progressive school was Teachers College, Columbia where the father of the system was a professor, John Dewey. Nor was there any protest from the Chairman of this great institution, Nicholas Murray Butler. It was a short step from this to the Social Science books, more generally known as "the Rugg Books." That the AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION was the sponsor of these Social Studies in the schools is astonishing. Under this organization a commission was set up, it included: Frank W. Ballou, Superintendent of Schools, Washington, D.C.; Charles A. Beard, formerly professor of Politics, Columbia University, author of many books on history and politics; Isaiah Bowman, Director, American Geological Society of New York, President of the International Geological Union; Ada Comstock, President of Radcliffe College; George S. Counts, Professor of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University; Avery O. Craven, Professor University of Chicago; Edmund E. Daly, formerly Dean of School of Business Administration, University of Michigan; now director of Social Sciences, Rockefeller Foundation; Guy Stanton Ford, professor of History, Dean of the Graduate School, University of Minnesota; Carleton J. H. Hayes, Professor of History, Columbia University; Ernest Horn, Professor of Education, University of Iowa; Henry Johnson, Professor of History, Teachers College, Columbia University; A. C. Krey, Professor of History, University of Minnesota; Leon C. Marshall Institute for the Study of Law, John Hopkins University; Charles E. Merriam, Professor of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, Director of Lincoln Experimental School; Jesse F. Steiner, Professor of Sociology, University of Washington. (From preface in the report, "The conclusions and Recommendations of the Committee report of the Commission on the Social Studies.") Teachers College and the American Geographical Society. It made generous use of the findings of scientific inquiry conducted by other scholars in both America and Europe. It has found particularly helpful the report of President Hoover's research committee on Recent Social Trends in the United States. (this can be found in the New York Times, January 2, 1933. It was financed by the Rockefeller Foundation, N. Y. Times February 26, 1933.) Clause 10. "As to the specific form which this 'collectivism', this integration and interdependence, is taking and will take in the future, the evidence at hand is by no means clear or unequivocal. IT MAY INVOLVE THE LIMITING OR SUPPLANTING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY BY PUBLIC PROPERTY OR IT MAY RETAIL THE PRESERVATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY, EXTENDED AND DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE MASSES. Most likely it will issue from a process of experimentation and will represent a composite of historic doctrines and social conceptions yet to appear. ALMOST CERTAINLY IT WILL INVOLVE A LARGER MEASURE OF COMPULSORY AS WELL AS VOLUNTARY CO-OPERATION OF CITIZENS IN THE CONDUCT OF THE COMPLEX NATIONAL ECONOMY. A CORRESPONDING ENLARGMENT OF THE FUNCTIONS OF GOVERNMENT AND IN INCREASING STATE INTERVENTION IN FUNDAMENTAL BRANCHES OF ECONOMY PREVIOUSLY LEFT TO INDIVIDUAL DISCRETION AND INITIATIVE—A STATE INTERVENTION THAT IN SOME INSTANCES MAY BE DIRECT AND MANDATORY AND IN OTHERS INDIRECT AND FACILITATIVE DATA THAT THE ACTUALLY INTEGRATING ECONOMY OF THE PRESENT DAY IS A FORERUNNER OF A CONSCIOUSLY INTEGRATED SOCIETY IN WHICH INDIVIDUAL ECONOMIC ACTIONS AND INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY Clause 12. "UNDERLYING AND ILLUSTRATIVE OF THESE TENSIONS ARE PRIVATION IN THE MIDST OF PLENTY. VIOLATION OF FIDUCIARY TRUST, GROSS INEQUITIES IN INCOME AND WEALTH, WIDESPREAD RACKETEERING AND BANDITRY, WASTEFUL USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UNBALANCED DISTRIBUTION AND ORGANIZATION OF LABOR AND LEISURE. THE HARNESSING OF SCIENCE TO INDIVIDUALISM IN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE, THE ARTIFICIALTY OF POLITICAL BOUNDARIES AND DIVISIONS, THE SUBJECTON OF PUBLIC WELFARE TO THE EGOISM OF PRIVATE INTERESTS, THE MALADJUSTMENT OF PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, PERSISTENT TENDENCIES TOWARD ECONOMIC INSTABILITY, DISPROPORTIONATE GROWTH OF DEBT AND PROPERTY CLAIMS IN RELATION TO PRODUCTION, DELIBERATE DESTRUCTION OF GOODS AND WITHDRAWAL OF EFFICIENCY FROM PRODUCTION, ACCELERATING TEMPO OF PANICS, CRISES, AND DEPRESSIONS ATTENDED BY EVER WIDER DESTRUCTION OF CAPITAL AND DEMORALIZATION OF LABOR, STRUGGLES AMONG NATIONS FOR MARKETS AND RAW MATERIALS LEADING TO INTERNATIONAL CONFLICTS AND WARS." that of the past. IT WILL BE ACCOMPANIED BY MANY UNACCUSTOMED RESTRAINTS AND LIBERTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND OPPORTUNITIES." (emphasis mine) Clause 4. "In two respects education will be challenged;" D. "General Applications." - (1) "Organized public education . . . is now compelled, if it is to fulfil its social obligations, to adjust its objectives, its curriculum, its methods of instructions and its administrative procedures to the requirements of the emerging integrated order." Clause 8. page 38 . . . "The Commission deliberately presents to education and affirms the desirability of, and economy managed in the interests of the masses as distinguished from any class or bureaucracy Clause 9. "From this point of view, a supreme purpose of education in the United States, in addition to the development of rich and many sided personalties, is the preparation of the rising generation to enter the society now coming into being through thought, ideal and knowledge rather than through coercion, regimentation and ignorance and to shape the form of that society in accordance with American ideals of popular democracy and personal liberty and dignity." preciation of the common problems of mankind and the significance of international relations." "Have you noticed how little present-day children know of American history, writes. Mr. Rudd, and the basic reasons for the liberties we enjoy? And haven't you also been shocked by some of the socialistic ideas and theories they have brought home from school? Or wondered at the astounding growth of organizations such as American Youth Congress, American Student Union, Young Communist League, Young Pioneers and others?" "Nothing about this story of degradation is clearer than that in any of these decades a fairly decent standard of living could have been had by the people of the expanding West. That it was not and is not today can be traced primarily to the theory and practice of government set up by our fathers." "According to Professor Rugg in his Teachers Guide' the United States is not a land of opportunity for all our people, for one-fifth of the people do not earn any money at all. There are great differences in the standards of living of the different classes of the people. The majority do not have any real security." "Andrew Carnegie, wrote Professor Ballinger was one of the fathers of internationalism. He was one of the first to conceive the idea of 'using' America for Europe's benefit. He gave to internationalism its present day significance—A European scheme to exploit America economically under cover of idealistic appeals to peace, friendship and brotherhood." Under the guise of building libraries, Carnegie built up the idea of the great philanthropist. If you will follow the League of Nations you will find that the advocates of this League were not far removed from the Carnegie. The astounding part is that men of accomplishment, men to whom the people have looked as great, are caught in the web of 'betrayal of their country'. Of course they have persuaded themselves that we must stand with Britain for our own preservation. These men have been advocates of cancelling the British debts to this country, of sending American boys to fight all over the world for the British Empire, their influence has been used in our legislative halls. No better example could be used than that of the debate on the British Loan. Documents were placed on the desks of the Senators advocating the passage of this Bill, the question was raised as to the propriety of this act, Carnegie control was holding sway. Just ask your Senator or Congressman about it. See the reaction and judge for yourself. Ask why it is impossible to have an investigation of these tremendous funds, maybe you will find out what is wrong in Washington, in the United States. Ask yourself, why were all the copies of Carnegie's book 'Triumphant Democracy' 1893 edition, removed from the libraries around the country, they have the revised edition with the last chapter omitted, the last chapter being the important one. 'The Reunion of Britain and America' or 'A Look Ahead'. Evidentally they thought it might not be well for their plans if the American people knew the contents of this chapter, they might not be willing to go along, to follow the leader, as it were. Our colleges are filled with professors who have been Rhodes scholars, Chairmen and Presidents are frequently to be found on the Carnegie and Rockefeller Boards. In the March 8th and 9th editions of the New York American 1932, the well known columnist John A. Kennedy wrote under the Caption:—"Drive to Force U. S. into League of Nations and World Court Revealed by Survey." "Backed by a \\$15,000,000.00 fund the propaganda machine is trying to control the public mind in America through the colleges, schools, churches, civic and professional organizations and libraries. Immediately a flood of letters and telegrams were received by the Senate in Washington." The principal recommendations of the report are (1) the lowering of American tariffs in a selective fashion in order to promote imports and thereby to promote international trade through the whole world, (2) The making of further cuts if the first tariff cuts are not enough to start world trade. (3) The paying of a dole to American workmen thrown out of work by handing their jobs to foreigners. (4) The repealing of the Johnson Act, which now forbids loans to foreign countries in default on loans, with the intimation that foreign lending should be resumed. (5) The further scaling down of war debts as a prelude to cancellation. (6) The further and closer co-operation with the League of Nations and its subsidiaries, the League Court, the Arms Convention and the International Labor Organization." "The figures submitted by Mr. Peek were ignored in the report. The report was written, not by the committee but by Dr. Alvin H. Hanson, the chief economic adivsor of Secretary Hull." Is it any wonder that our schools are contaminated with subversive and deliberately slanted text books when we understand what these foundations are sponsoring? Is it any wonder that our children do not understand what patriotism and loyalty mean? These foundations have too much influence in our schools, it is indeed a two edged sword for the children not only imbibe It was in 1934 that this organization met at the Carnegie Mansion on Fifth Avenue, New York. Professor E. A. Seligman was the Chairman for the afternoon. He introduced Mrs. Carnegie, who responded with the remark:—"I feel that the International Student's Union can do much toward developing right thinking between countries. We are fortunate in having S. K. Ratcliff, the British Journalist here today." Closing his talk Mr. Ratcliff said:—"What of the 1935 outlook in the storm cloud over Europe? The universal assumption is that England and America are stable and conservative. But in regard to the future let us not put out of our consciousness the common peril of the complete break in many of our social systems. A world can end. Not the United States, not even Great Britain can be said to be free of the danger of the overthrow of a system." # LEAGUE TO ENFORCE PEACE To understand what has been happening to this country as well as to the world one must know the steps leading to the world chaos. At this meeting was stated:—"We believe it to be desirable for the United States to join a League of Nations—binding signatories to the following:" "Mr. S. Van Houston (Holland) stated the 'Interparliamentary Union' "To secure the maintenance of peace after the close of the present war; first by the use of economic and military force." (it does not seem to have occurred to these men that peace cannot be gained by force.) - 4. Adoption by the House and Senate of a joint resolution of the same character as that we are seeking from the state legislatures." "With this we will have succeeded in enlisting the Congress." This was the issue upon which General Douglas Mac Arthur was recalled from Japan. We understand from a reliable source that the British Ambassador to Japan called upon General Mac Arthur and told him, 'My country wants you to put Japan in the sterling block, to which General Mac Arthur replied 'No, in the United States dollar block, so that she can trade with the United States.' A few days later the Ambassador returned and again spoke to the General, this time his remark was, 'I think I should tell you, General, that if you do not put Japan in the sterling block my country is going to see that you are removed from Japan." Why should the British attempt to tell an American General what he must do, is that not an insult to the people of this country? By now Colonel House had entered the picture, his father had come from England and settled in Texas, he became the advisor to President Wilson, an internationalist. House realized that to take a dominant position in the world, this country must have a large army, but rather than arouse proposals. Among those whose names appeared upon the invitation were:—Lyman A. Abbott, editor of the Outlook, Edwin A. Alderman, President University of Virginia; James B. Angel, later President of Yale; James M. Beck; Alexander Graham Bell; Jacob M. Dickinson, formerly Secretary of War; William H. P. Faunce, President of Brown University; James Cardinal Gibbons; John Hays Hammond; James Grier Hibben, President of Princeton; David Star Jordan, President Stanford University; A. Lawrence Lowell, President of Harvard; Governor James M. Mc Creery, Kentucky; Alton B. Parker; Jacob H. S. Schiff; Isaac Seligman; Robert Sharp, President of Tulane University; William H. Short, Secretary of the New York Peace Society; Oscar S. Straus, member of Hague Court; William H. Taft; Benjiman Ide Wheeler, President University of California; William Allen White; John Sharp Williams and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise." Having committed many of the foremost men of the country to his international project Marburg was wise, none of the great financial interests appeared yet they had control of the scheme that they had created. Never before in the history of the country was such control over the foreign policy of a President. When questioned in Richmond, Virginia, about Wilson's lack of leadership, Taft replied:—"Never mind, we'll smoke him out yet." Taft then made a tour of the country to explain the workings of the League. Thus did the internationalists get control, the next step was the appointment of a Secretary of State friendly to Great Britain. It is easy to understand that this League to Enforce Peace was running the country, the whole project depended on a complete understanding between Britain and America." "It is necessary to keep a certain aura of secrecy over these plans, there was a certain amount of inconsistency in combining international finance and socialism which must be kept from the conservatives. It was, then, imperative that the money interests be kept under cover, and that the whole movement be cloaked with the guise of humanism. In other words much stress must be laid on humanity, human rights, peace and democracy, for in these things there would be an agreement. Money finance and socialism were not to be discussed. In other words this scheme must be whispered only to those whose knowldge of history and international politics would enable them to grasp its practicability, those who would appear to be working only for universal peace, for were they not educating the masses to an internationalism that would entail great political sacrifices on the part of the nations? (emphasis authors) This, then, was the background of the League of Nations. This was what this country was spared by the 'Wilful Eleven', our real patriots, who fought so valiantly in the Senate to keep us out of the League of Nations. "IF EVER I HELP TO SET UP A FORCE GREAT ENOUGH TO DESTROY MY COUNTRY; I HOPE ALMIGHTY GOD WILL STRIKE ME DEAD BEFORE I CONSUMMATE THE CRIME." (Hon. James A. Reed, Missouri.) Words that should be as immortal as those of Patrick Henry, spoken at the time of the Revolution:—"Give me Liberty or give me death." "The man who is willing to give to any nation or assemblage of nations the right to mind the business of the American people ought to disclaim American citizenship and emigrate to the country he is willing to have mind America's business for her." I must say I look with perfect philosophy upon the difference in numbers." "On the other hand advocates of the league tell us it is of sufficient power to control the passions and ambitions of the world and hold in leash the armed forces of mankind." "Both of these doctrines, said Senator Reed, cannot be correct." "In the opinion of others, it involves the sacrifice of American Sovereignty, plunges our Republic into the woes of the world, and jeopar-dizes the future of mankind." "Instead of convincing the people he called those who disagreed with "If anyone declined to turn his back on Washington and Jefferson he was described as afflicted with serious aberrations of thinking." "If one refuses to surrender with the pen what Washington gained with the sword, he is described as a 'contemptuous quitter'." "If one ventures to point out that Article 10 binds us to send our soldiers to defend the frontiers of every land in every quarter of the globe, he is 'afflicted with amazing ignorance'." "If he looks with pride upon the glorious achievements of America's past and refuses to abandon the policies which have brought us to the heights of prosperity he is 'a dreamer living in the forgotten age'." Just what brought about this state of affairs and whither are we going? In the eyes of the British this was wrong, it must be stopped, and as Andrew Carnegie said, "Do it by peaceful means if possible, if not, then by war." Records in the New York Public Library. By the Grace of God, we had enough patriots in the United States to save this country and our sovereignty. Do not think for a moment that all was well between this country and England for we were meeting the same antagonisms as had beset Germany. During World War I the United States had built ships (this was imperative for we had to pull England's chestnuts out of the fire) and we did increase our commerce with other nations, and it brought the wrath of England on It was Carter Goodrich, the then Chairman of the International Labor Office, who told us at the luncheon of the Commission for the Organization for Peace at the Hotel Commodore, in 1943, that :—"The International Labor Office was set up by the League of Nations and it in turn set up the C. I. O. in every country for the 'takeover'." This explains many things that have happened, the backing given to the C. I. O., its power, the fact it received so much support by the past administrations. Mr. Goodrich is now teaching at Columbia University. # THE UNITED NATIONS The do-gooders didn't tell the people that World War III had already been planned, that the lines of battle had been drawn, that the war would be in the Middle East and over oil. Certainly not, that was too much for the people to know, we must keep them fooled, in that way their success according to the teachings of Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie who so wanted the unity of England and America, that he sewed the Union Jack and the American flag together and flew this monstrosity from Skibo Castle in Scotland. Had the American people been on their toes this would have been recognized as a penal offense and Andrew would have been dealt with accordingly. Remember Andrew said: "do this by peaceful means if possible, but if not, then by war." Arriving in Washington, we went to the Committee room, we were asked to be heard at the end of the day, we declined as most of the people had gone. We did get before the committee early the next morning. We asked to have the transcript of the hearings sent to us. Had it not happened to us personally, it would have been impossible for us to believe that our sworn testimony would be distorted, deleted, added to until one would hardly realize one's own thoughts. Insistence and another trip to Washington, a call at Mr. Pendell's office (Mr. Pendell was in charge of the stenographers) and finally a call at the Foreign Relation's Office forced the corrections. It was taking advantage of an extemporaneous speech which gave the opportunity for such action. Perhaps I should also say that I had to tell Mr. Pendell that if the corrections were not made that I would send out to the people the correct version and tell them why. He told me that would ruin him, for my part I could not see what difference it made, whether he was ruined or I. The Hearings in Washington were July 9, 1945 and on July 17th I received a letter from Mrs. Lilian T. Mowrer, Chairman of the Washington Chapter. The letter follows: — Mrs. Catherine P. Baldwin, 1245 Madison Avenue, New York City. Dear Mrs Baldwin .- Mrs. Anne O'Hare Mc Cormick instructs me to tell you that she never made any such statement nor does she hold such ideas. Yours very truly, Lilian T. Mowrer. Chairman D. C. Chapter Women's Action Committee for Victory and Lasting Peace. Now it happens that the husband of Mrs. Mowrer, Edgar Ansell Mowrer, I am reliably informed (San Francisco Leader) has been a British propagandist in this country for many years. There are many representative women on the roster of the Women's Action Committee, a few who have been active over the years are Mrs. Carrie Chapman Catt; Mrs. Norman de Whitehouse; Mrs. Arthur Brin; Mrs. Henry Goodard Leach; Mrs. William Dick Sporborg; Mrs. Paul Mellon; Vera Michelle Dean; Virginia Gildersleeve; Mrs. J. Borden Harriman; Mrs. Ogden Reid; Dorothy Thompson; Sarah Wambaugh; Miss Mary Dingman; Mrs. Robert J. Bacon; Mrs. Dana Converse Backus; Mrs. George Fielding Eliot; Mrs. Dewitt Stetten; Mildred Adams; Mrs. L. E. Fradkin; Mrs. Vera Beggs Conway; Mrs. Burnett Mahon. # CONGRESSIONAL RECORD # Corrected Testimony of Mrs. Catherine P. Baldwin on the United Nations Charter # EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF # HON. WILLIAM LANGER # OF NORTH DAKOTA # IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES Saturday, July 28 (legislative day of Monday, July 9), 1945 The CHAIRMAN. Proceed. Mrs.Baldwin. I am objecting to this charter as given to us from San Francisco because it is in contradiction to our United States Constitution, which all of you Senators, and the President of the United States, and every man who holds office from the highest to the lowest, in this country, is sworn to uphold. If you sign this charter you are signing away the sovereign rights of the people of this country which you are not authorized to do. You are given specific instructions when you are sent here to represent us. Those authorities are clearly defined. I do not concur with Senator VANDENBERG when he says we should accept this because it was agreed upon by President Roosevelt at Yalta—when we were told it The late Mr. Roosevelt is not here to speak for himself. And, furthermore, he had not the authority to promise anything in the name of the American people without the concurrence of two thirds of this body—which has not been given. This is, to my mind, a very direct attempt to sabotage the Constitution of the Inited States, to take away sovereign rights. Under this charter five men not elected, merely appointed, whom we do not know and whom we may not trust, are given the destiny of this country. It is a demagogic, oligarchic project. It is an instrument of war. making? This charter guarantees nothing. But under the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights, I am guaranteed life, liberty and the pursuit of hap- piness. Some of your colleagues—challenged—have admitted on the public platform that this is unconstitutional. If it is unconstitutional, I do not see how you can even discuss it here in the Senate. Several of you Senators have admitted it. Some of you have said we must cir- cumvent the Constitution. There are groups, who are doing very good propaganda work down here in Washington. But you are not hearing from the rank and file back home. Gentlemen, the people of this country are slow to arouse. They know they have been betrayed. They have talked, but you turned a silent ear. There comes a time in the history of every country when the people's silence is very dangerous. I am sure that you will agree with me that the honorable, honest way for the United States Senate to handle this matter is by constitutional means. No one can criticize you for that, when you go before your electorate and tell them the truth of what this document stands for and what it means Mr. CONNALLY, you yourself, said it would be done by constitutional means. The Republican platform said it would be done by constitutional means. The Democratic platform said it would be done by constitutional means. Mr. FULBRIGHT said it would be done by constitutional means; I heard Mr. FULBRIGHT at the luncheon for the Commission for the Organization for Peace, say, "We freshmen Congressmen went to Congress pledged to the world government." We are not children; we understand what is going on. We think it is just about time we got back to the founding fathers, and to the Constitution of the United States. I know that when you think of this in your serious moments you will not want to put yourself in the position of having the people back home say that you I beg of you, gentlemen, before you put your names to this document, to This is not a peace document this is a document of force, of aggression, of grabbing—grabbing the raw materials of this country; grabbing our boys, grabbing The League to Enforce Peace is dealt with in the preceding chapters, it certainly was not in the interests of the United States. # THE LINITED NATIONS CHARTER Speech of Hon. William Langer Mr. President, I say to you and to the other members of the Senate that, in my judgment, if the charter had been in effect when the American Revolution took place, France and all other countries who came to help us would not have been able to come, and today we would still be a colony under the rule of England. Having so pledged myself and having been elected to my senatorship upon such pledge, and not having been elected to create an organization to which we would give a promise, either expressed or implied, that it would have authority to send our boys all over the earth, I cannot support the charter. I believe it is fraught with danger to the American people, and to American institutions. I further believe that when a candidate for office pledges himself to specific promises, those promises should be honored, regardless of the political consequences which may follow to the candidate who made them. We are here, Mr. President, in our fine offices and upon this senatorial floor, blissfully ignorant of what those 11,000,000 veterans may be thinking. After all, they constitute the backbone of the common people of America. Certainly there is no reason for such a hurry to pass this charter that some steps could not have been taken to have referred the matter to the people of the country, including the men and women in the armed forces, before the final vote was taken upon it. As their representative here in the Senate, I cannot, I will not, God helping me, vote for a measure which I believe to be unlawful under our Constitution, a measure which, in my opinion, betrays the very people who sent us to the Senate as their representatives." end of quote. Let us turn back to the editorial pages of the New York American, a "And yet, the Versailles Treaty ushered in a veritable era of TREATY VIOLATION AND REPUDIATION." "The list of violated post-war treaties is staggering." England has been successful in the United States, we stayed out of the League of Nations, we are caught in the United Nations with all that it entails. England has her foot in the door. # WORLD GOVERNMENT With all the pressure at their command, the Internationalists pushed this country into the United Nations. Let it be recorded here that Senator Patrick Mc Carran has been forthright enough to tell the American people his regret that he voted for the United Nations, and so has ex-Senator Tom Connally. Would that there were pages enough in this book to give all of the propaganda that was used to get this country in the spider's web. Perhaps some day that will be done and those who have helped betray and destroy the sovereignty of this country will be called to answer for their perfidy. Without a question there are those who were sincere in their belief that world government would bring peace. I speak of those, who, garbed as wolves in sheep's clothing, those, who, under the 'guise' of loyalty, those, who have been part of the propaganda machine and are willing to destroy this nation under the guise of peace. As has been said many times, all persons in government employ from the President down are required by law to take an oath, to protect this Constitution of the United States from the enemy within and without. Is it not hard to understand that President Franklin D. Roosevelt would base his post war security organization on the model of a 'community of states' drafted under the auspices of the CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT for INTERNATIONAL PEACE by 200 prominent AMERICANS and CANADIANS—78 of them college presidents or professors? The section which prepared the report was under the chairmanship of Dr. R. Harold W. Dodds, president of Princeton. # PEACE PRINCIPLES - 2. Mankind is one in nature and in the sight of God. No group of men is inherently superior to any other, and none is above any other beloved of God. stamish!ktamish! \\$task:tamish!ri!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here we have from the Conference of a Just and Durable Peace the same proposals as have been promoted by the Carnegie, Rockefeller, Rhodes and other foundations. To these has now been added the Ford Foundation. To establish this world government many organizations were formed, of all colors and plans but always with the same goal. If you do not like this set-up we have another for you, one not quite so pink. Perhaps the most insidious is that contained in the book "One Anglo-American Nation, the Foundation of Anglosaxony as Basis of World Federation. A British response to Streit." While to Wendell Willkie is attributed the statement on February 2, 1941: "An economic and social union of the United States and the British Empire . . . A bond of brotherhood linking the English-Speaking peoples of the world." He further states that, "nine tenths of the people of England are for it the moment Churchill gives the word, but the offer must come from America." In presenting his case for this Anglo-Saxon union Mr. Catlin states the objects; "(1) is to suggest that this (Canadian) and other frontiers should cease to exist, not almost, but entirely. (2) A further object is that not only the frontier be eliminated but that countries be fused and their people united in some Federation, and first those people who are close together, (3) to advocate that the federation be a commonwealth, or the federal union of the English Speaking peoples, to which may well be added the Scandinavian and Dutch. Our object is to constitute 'One Anglo-American Nation'... The establishment of such a nation can be concurrent with Pan-European Union to which Britain would form the bridgehead in the Pan-European Union as the United States is to the Pan American Union. "England has no one permanent foe in Europe, for none of her vital interests conflict with the vital interests of any European power. Her only foe is that power or that coalition of powers which may endeavour to dominate Europe." "She, Germany, wanted to be a world power but world power and world domination are not the same thing. England is a world power but does not dominate the world." "Whatever power is master of that region, which has been called the Middle Zone, is Master of all Europe." (19th Century and after) she wants to survive as a world power. England must now begin to stop Russia." There are two powerful forces in the world—Britain needs not only to maintain the balance of power, she needs to control the financial power which she has lost to the United States. Clever moves on her part are to spread the propaganda of Communism from Russia in the United States and thus condition the minds of the American people so that they will be willing to fight Russia. While doing this Britain does not tell the people that the British Israel World Federation of 6 Buckingham Gate had put in print in 1933 and repeated in 1937 the fact that they would use the Soviet System to establish their British Commonwealth of the world; nor does she tell of the statement on page 95 of the book 'The Three Headed Eagle' wherein is written that Communism would be the tool that they would use to overthrow the countries in Europe, that they would do this under the power of Russian Victory prestige. Thus we find one country Russia being pitted against the United States while Britain plays with both, thus does she weaken this country and Russia and regain her dominant position in power politices and her prestige as money lender of the world. ment for International Peace. He toured this country spreading hatred of Italy, Germany and Japan, the three frogs who must go. These propagandists came here by the score for Sir Charles was not alone in his mission. If you will look back to World War 1, when we got involved in the affairs of Europe, and the situation between the United States and England when we financed England and then turn to the Congressional Record of May 9th, 1946 during the debate of the British Loan and read what Senator Taft had to say, quote:—Mr. Taft speaking: "Does the Senator realize that there is \\$4,000,000,000.00 worth of notes in the United States Treasury, which were signed by the British Government and which are not being redeemed, and which no one, including the British Government, expects to be redeemed" and going further in answer to the question by Senator Mc Mahon that 'he presumed the lend-lease obligations were included in that', Mr. Taft replied:— As you will recall this debt moratorium was engineered when Mr. Hoover was in the Presidential Office, you may also recall that at that time the Prime Minister of England made a trip to this country, that man was Ramsay Mac Donald, the man who sat on the logs on the Rapidan with the then President Hoover and on leaving this country stated "I accomplished more than I had hoped." N. Y. Times, Sept. 30, 1929. That was the prelude to the moratorium, if there is any doubt in your mind you can read the facts in the speeches of the late Hon. Louis T. Mc Fadden of Pennsylvania, December 9, 11, 15, 1931. Therein you will find how and when the debts were put on the backs of the American people and at the time we were suffering from a terrible stock market crash and a resultant depression. And further:—"The plan was in accordance with the idea of Cecil Rhodes. . . . There was no focus of power until Germany provided one against the Anglo-Saxon Powers and against the League." "Nationalism, certainly not as cultural autonomy but as a sovereign statism is as dead as the Nineteenth Century and laissez-faire," says author. Many of these are familiar names, reference to the year books of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace will show how these forces that would destroy the sovereignty of this country are linked. Mr. Duff Cooper is another of those who quoted Mrs. Roosevelt as saying at luncheon at the White House, "Federal Union is one of the few creative ideas that has emerged since the war." Let us continue, for this is important to the American people, if they would retain the right to decide their own destiny. To show how we are being tied to the British Empire the author states:—"In the Bermudas the American flag already flies; since the decisive meeting between Premier MacKenzie King and President Roosevelt at Ogdensburg, a Joint Permanent Board of Defense, of the United States and Canada, has been set up under dual Canadian and American chairmanship. The American chairman being the well known Mayor of New York, Mr. La Guardia. The British and American Commonwealths have, as Mr. Churchill said in the House of Commons, become confused like the tumbled waters of the Mississippi and the Missouri, and the joint flood—'goes rolling along.' Anglo-Saxondom has been born, born as an actual, dynamic, and unprecedented power, with equivalent responsibilities." "That an application for the elimination of the Canadian-American frontier would anyhow receive highly priviledged treatment from the Senate of the United States scarcely needs discussion." states, but when all sovereignty of states—unless it were a World State—will be mitigated by mutual federal obligations." "I therefore confess that I favour the second policy of an intimate Union of the Western Powers (and perhaps the northern), loyally and vitally put behind a revised and universal League of Nations—which would also include the U. S. S. R., Germany, and certain new Federal Unions inside Europe." (Is this not NATO?) "If we look backwards, then we shall allow the Western States to remain as they are and we shall solve our problem by breaking up Germany." "It is here that area of Mittel Europe becomes a problem." Speaking of his allegiance to Britain, Mr. Catlin states that his allegiance was given to Anglo-Saxony, this he does not believe would be considered as imperialism, but rather another name for what he terms a developed patriotism, away from 'International Anarchy' and national armies toward a World State of the future. The Fourth Region, the one that involves the United States, Mr. Catlin thinks, can now be organized." And now he asks the question, "SHALL WE HAVE A THIRD WORLD WAR TO SETTLE THIS OUESTION?" And again Catlin states: "The peoples of Europe would probably prefer an Anglo-American control of Europe than a German or Russian. An Anglo-Continental bloc buckled to a Pan-American bloc through the British Commonwealth would fill the need." When it comes to the question of economic control, they all admit the necessity of control of the raw materials of the world. The proponents go further and think it might be necessary to control by public cartelization and joint industrial controls. Right here is where the Americans should stop and ponder for in this cartel planning they trankly state that 'manufacturing will be done in the country where labor is the cheapest, where labor is high that labor will have to go on the dole' (See England's Service, by Sarpedon, McMillan Ltd. England 1941.) Who will pay the dole they do not say, and unless American factories are operating there will be no dividends, so where will the money come from to pay the dole and how will the investors fare? They seem not to consider that men on dole are not able to purchase and certainly without dividends the investors will not be able to buy. That the question is political and leads to economic advantages seems to be the conclusion. Here, too, is an important phase of this whole intrigue:—"World Free Trade is possible with, but only with, a world control of the labour market, of wages, and of prices. Unemployment will only be eliminated How, then, shall the Western countries commend their system to the electorate of England, Scotland, America or Canada as better than the Russian? These Western countries are very rich, as far as the British Commonwealth is concerned such advancement must rest in their Colonial areas. Some of these can be designated as Jamaica and the British Honduras. And now comes the part that should make every American take notice: "It would be better to pay off honourably our American Debt by leasing for 999 years an area for an American Naval base in this region." (a foot note states this was written in 1938-9, that would be prior to World War II). You will recall that we have established such bases but that we have no real possession of them, they are only leased, and they have become a great asset to the British. Really another gift. transfer it, as a substantial basis of wealth and power and as a peculium, to the direct rule of Geneva or a World State which requires such sovereign possession to give it dignity." Is this not the Point 4 program of Harry Truman, only it did not originate with Harry, it was propounded by Kenneth de Courcy (Intelligence Digest promoter) at the Hotel Biltmore, New York, long before Mr. Truman told us about it. To those of us who were so 'complimented' as to receive the engraved invitation, which came from London, and with the screen pictures of Africa, it savoured of Cecil Rhodes. Just stop and think, this means a great deal to the British, if and when, they succeed in setting up their British Commonwealth of the World, for they and they alone will have control of that World Government. That is the plan. "We need, says the author, a United States of Africa under the direct control of the League at Geneva as our goal . . . In the interim, we need the development of the vast British area—on trustee principles, in the fashion already indicated, and with the increasing use in administration of negroes, including American negroes—under the Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth. This domestic undertaking, quite as much as control by international bodies of gentlemen not free from pressures by the speculative exploiter and international financier, is what is important. There is no reason why American wealth and engineering or Dominion ability should be excluded from this field, which is a steady invitation to British engineering and technical skill—and to the youthful technician, unemployed when war work stops—once the requisite public financial resources are put, by the Federation, behind it." "Free migration, subject to such restrictions as obtain domestically at present." "A common law, and a common supreme court of appeal on issues in dispute between collective members or individual citizens." "A common allegiance, such that engaging in war against any member involves treason and will be so treated in the courts." The right to taxation. "On the subject of currencies Mr. Catlin calls attention to the fact that separate currencies obtain in different parts of the Commonwealth, but the care for an international currency issued from Basle may have strong arguments in its favor, however, the currencies of the Dominions, with the exception of Canada, are within the sterling bloc and Mrs. Wendell Willkie has proposed the establishment of a stabilized dollar-sterling ratio." Let the reader here contemplate the statements of Winston Churchill on his last visit to this country and the conference with President Eisenhower. This plan has long been on the agenda, of what benefit to this country? In the matter of trade it is suggested that a commission like the United States Interstate Commerce Commission be adopted. If the policy would be that advocated by Andrew Carnegie and his followers it would be a sad day for the United States for it would seem that our part would be to supply the raw materials and let Britain manufacture the goods, or again if it were the policy to manufacture where labor is cheapest, as suggested in the book, England's Service by Sarpedon, 1941. One has only to look at the many newspaper articles and those by the economists to understand that this is not a program for the benefit of this country, it is a program for Britain. Mr. Catlin thinks that all is in the timing. In other words, he says, "With this caution, then, I will say that if I thought—to take, as instance the Federal Union of the Western peoples—that I could get representatives of the United States, the Dominions of the British Commonwealth, including Britain, and France to come together in conference, perhaps with a purely economic agenda drafted by Mr. Hull, and yet with the specific intention of developing a Federation; if this conference of the North Atlantic resolved to meet regularly, by rotation in Washington, London, Paris and a Dominion Capitol, every one or two years to discuss all regional problems without excluding issues of sovereignty from discussion; and if this conference gave its blessing to discussions of yet more intimate institutional collaboration on the one hand between Paris and London, and on the other between Ottawa and Concretely, I suggest that, states the author, by or before the beginning of the Peace Conference, we should have a Conference of the English Speaking Commonwealths established, meeting annually in the capitols of the English Speaking world by rotation. This Anglo-American Union should not necessarily exclude other countries. Of this Conference I suggest that the KING should be PRESIDENT. The President of the United States should be Chairman ex-officio. The office of Vice Chairman should be occupied by rotation or election. I visualize Mr. Eamon de Valera, General Smuts or King Haakon as possible Vice-Chairman. The office of Secretary should also be by election; and Mr. Eden's name occurs to me as that of a desirable first Secretary. His League of Nations experience would be of value and would guarantee collaboration at Geneva." Having read this, just where do you think this country will end, do you think for one moment that we would get an even break with the King (Queen) at the head? If you do, dear reader, you are in for a cruel awakening, poverty will be your lot. The third stage is economic. It is not the case that this economic collaboration, in the shape of international or regional institutions, will be an affair of the post war or reconstruction period only. Union or integration, on the basis not only of common armed defense, but of the economic collaboration necessary for common defense, already exists. Behind a North American Permanent Joint Defense Board, which is one of the gigantic historical innovations of our time, lie schemes and practices for the collaboration of American and Canadian factories—and of American and British factories. Joint economic committees, facilitating Anglo-American military supply, are at present time being established in the United States. The economic stage has been reached; and economic integration has passed already into the stage of actuality. It is, moreover, precisely these fields of war-time collaboration that are more promising for noiseless growth into the phase of post-war economic control institutions, tariff arrangements and joint commissions." (Emphasis authors) "If we do not accept such a project then the alternatives are Hitler's restored Roman Empire, keeping peace by Caesarean force; Marxist Communism which believes there will be enduring peace only on the other side of civil war with capitalists and all their dependents, including most of the middle class; and pacifism, which is a strictly individual route that invites the pilgrim soul to eschew trying to change 'the world' by the forcible ways of the world. The continuation of the old system of State divisions means the inevitable continuation of wars—means world war again in 1960 and means it quite inevitably, nations being what they are. To this we must answer 'Never again'. The Social Revolutionary 'New Order' would definitely be better—Federal Union, however, equally emphatically is naught unless it spells the abrogation of national political sovereignties and the actual abolition of frontiers, beginning with those in brute fact easiest to abolish." The author goes on to say that this last stage may be approached through regular conferences having executive powers. The point is that it has to be approached and entered upon, not evaded." The author then goes on to suggest:— "beginning with proposal No. 1. Pushing on this plan the author states that Federal Union means the abolishing of all frontiers, this must be carried on, however, with regard to the region, as say Canada, which belongs to the New World as well as the British Commonwealth. For this country it must be a policy which will be not only a New World Policy but also a loyal Commonwealth policy. That any policy that visualizes Canada as involved in a war of 1960 or in the Old World's disputes of nations of eternal war would be repudiated in the reaction to isolationism bound to follow this war. Another function of Canada is that she can act as broker between the Old World and the New. That already (and this was written in 1941) we find President Roosevelt's agricultural advisor, suggesting that the British wheat market should be left exclusively to Canada as a matter of Canadian-U.S. friendly arrangement—that, the writer states would enable Canada to buy more from us." (meaning Britain). "What Canada demands, says the author, must, within some measure, be conceded both by Great Britain and by the United States. She can command her terms, Britain cannot afford to see the disruption of the Commonwealth. The United States cannot view with equanimity any grave divergence between American and Canadian policy. Canada, in brief, can 'sit pretty' granted that Canada will but make up her mind what she wants herself and what scheme of world order she is prepared to back. Her's is a pivotal position and, that fact being granted and utilized with skill by her statesmen, she can attain an influence quite disproportionate to her position as a secondary power. To a slightly less degree the same argument applies to Australia." "In the United States the proposition must be presented in a fashion that takes well into account the isolationist undertow in the sentiment of that country which, temporarily in retreat, is quite capable of reasserting itself." "The project must be presented as, primarily and in its most outstanding feature, a North American scheme, although not exclusive of Pan-American schemes. It will make a reality of the union of North America and this voluntarily; and the 'three thousand miles of undefended frontier' will in effect cease to be a frontier. A common citizenship will supervene with reciprocal electoral rights, such as now exist between British residents in "The advantages of the scheme to the United States are so immense that they are perhaps best not elaborated too fully or emphasized too much." "The most obvious objection to the whole scheme is that it means selling out the British Commonwealth to the United States . . . . . " Certainly any criticism to the effect that the Founding of the Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth means selling out the United States to the British Commonwealth is imbecile, since clearly the United States would tend to assume-and, with the present economic drift, would more certainly tend to assume - the hegemony of the whole." Stating that the United States cannot be indifferent to a German-Russian Japanese combination, he feels it is a superb opportunity to build up a political North America and to consolidate it, and later Pan-American Union, and an English Speaking Union making a buckle with democracy abroad, without war. I would like to put up in Lafayette Square, Washington, opposite the White House, amid all the French, Polish and German worthies there, a statue of Oliver Cromwell compensating the Irish by a second statue of St. Patrick or maybe Burke or Raleigh." "It having become plain in the course of human events that war, the greatest present scourge of mankind, is only to be checked by the mergence of the sovereignty of each nation in the sovereignty of all and by the pooling of armed forces. And so we come to the conclusion:—"Wishing as patriots, that our states may be among the foremost leaders in such an enterprise for the advancement of civilization and the common happiness, and desiring to defend, against the menace of military despotism and of a monstrous tyranny over thought, at once the well-being of our communities, the economic security of our people, the liberty of our persons, the right of free speech and assemblage, the integrity of scientific experiment and the dignity of our mental freedom as moral beings with a responsibility higher than the responsibility to any prince or state power." "We declare that, by this act of federation, we constitute ourselves a new people and that of this our nation we do all equally become citizens, without discrimination or privilege of race, sex, religion, occupation or class, enjoying equal rights in all parts of this federation as federal voters, equality before the law and equality of access to public provisions for health, education and work. To each we guarantee the right to work, of decent subsistence, and to education according to capacity, the right to free and impartial justice, the right to be tried by due process of law without delay and freedom from arbitrary arrest, and the right to all freedom of worship, speech, writing, assemblage and political combination that shall be of peaceable intent and manner . . . . ." "We, therefore, further declare that the Federal executive shall be charged to take measures, if needful, by force, to prevent the setting up in any member state of any government not duly elected and regularly renewed by a majority or largest electoral portion of the voters or that denies the right of free discussion, constitutional liberty, free combination and secret ballot vote to other parties than its own . . . . We declare that henceforth our prime loyalty is to this, our federated nation, thus sovereignly constituted; and that to it all officers and soldiers of the armed forces owe allegiance; that federal law shall override domestic laws save as otherwise provided by the Constitution of this Union, which constitution may be amended by a two-thirds majority in both Houses of the Federal Legislature, and by majority in the popular legislatures of three-fourths of the States; and that suits between States and between citizens on matters within the province of the federal jurisdiction snall be decided in the federal courts hereinafter to be constituted. It shall be treasonable to use armed force to incite to the actual use of armed forces against the Federal Union." "As token of the amity in which it is our firm purpose to live, we declare the abolition of all frontiers between our States, save so far as may be required for the federal regulation of interstate trade until such time as free trade may be established, or for the detection of criminals, or for the control of migration under federal law. In further sign of which amity, and in gratitude to those, our predecessors, lovers of peace and liberty, who have made this union possible, we make this general Declaration of Federation, precedent to the establishment of a Constitutional Commission and to it set our hands and seals." End of quote and the end of our country. This plan which unfolds from the numerous writings of Marburg, was one which could not be concretely expressed, since it required a certain amount of secrecy in its execution. Apparently, too, there was a fatal inconsistency in trying to combine international finance, essentially conservative, with Socialism. Moreover, neither the Socialists nor the Russian reactionaries, were prepared for Jewish leadership in the field of international politics. It was imperative, therefore, that its financial aspects be screened, that the money interests behind it be held under cover, that the whole movement be cloaked with the guise of pure humanism. In other words, much must be said of humanity, of human rights of peace and democracy, since in these the Pacifists, the Socialists and the masses generally would find their motives; little of Socialism, money or finance. In short the scheme must be whispered only to those whose knowledge of history and international politics would enable them to grasp its practicability, who could recognize the need of appearing to be working only for universal peace while educating the world up to an international ism that would demand political sacrifices on the part of the nations." The United States has done very well in the past when it stayed out of foreign entanglements, people have come to these shores that they might make a decent living, are they ready to cast it all aside and go back to the servitude that awaits them under this world government 'scheme' for scheme it is. It is plain to see that to accomplish their purposes these internationalists deliberately deceived the people. Under the 'guise' of public welfare, humanity, peace and democracy, we have had two major wars, a so-called police action in Korea, which cost the American people the loss of many There is much more that could be written, countless examples of propaganda could be cited bearing on this issue, is it too late? # IT WAS THEN THAT MEN WEPT S. G. Clark, Social Register, Canada, Dec. 25, 1917. # ALONG THE WAY It is an old and wise axiom:—"Give up not the old friend for the new." In the Herald Tribune, New York, March 13, 1943, editorial page 6, we read:—"When a foreign government will not move in the direction we want it to move," said Mr. Bullitt, "there is only one way to make it move." That, he explains, is the old way of getting a donkey to move by holding a carrot in front of his nose and a club behind his tail". Times Herald March 2, 1947:—Editorial: "At the bicentennial conferences, Princeton University, Dr. Garrett Mattingly, a big dignitary from Cooper Union, New York City, read a paper on what he considered excessive teaching in U. S. Schools of . . . . U. S. HISTORY. He was supported by a professor from Yale and one from Wesleyan, the other seventy two did not agree with him. His claim was that if you teach young Americans too much about the history of their own country you are likely to turn them into nationalists and super-patriots, and that is a most deplorable thing. We should, he said, de-emphasize U. S. History in our schools and step up the stress on Western Hemisphere and European history." As the Times Herald so aptly states, if pride in your own country is a bad thing isn't pride in the much larger One World a worse thing?" "Particularly he attacks:-competition, property and private enterprise." "He proposes full employment, socialized health, education, and housing; cooperative agriculture; state control over the location of industries; and public enterprise along exploitative lines." Evening Bulletin: Philadelphia, Pa. September 6, 1939:—"U. S. Ships subject to British Search:—Senator Vandenburg (Michigan) speaking at the Michigan State Fair "This is not our war. It should not be." "Mackenzie King took particular pride in the fact that "Canada's war effort is a voluntary effort and that every Canadian fighting in the war volunteered to do so." Better look into this shipping strike situation, America, who is behind it and why? "The other reason is the revelation that not even so understanding and tactful a man as General 'Ike' Eisenhower can whip the resources of 15 countries into a single resistance force without some political and economic unity among them." (emphasis authors) . . . . "It is becoming obvious to all but the blind that either the North At lantic Treaty Organization has to become something more than a 14 country (fifteen with West Germany) debating society or it is going to fail to meet the monolithic challenge of the Kremlin." "In the process of becoming something more, an Anglo-American merger might well be the first step." . . . . . Where, Mr. Mowrer, would the United States benefit by merging with an insolvent country, would this not put the burden of the indebtedness on the American people? Why should the American people take on the debts of Britain? Why should we keep the British Empire together, other peoples in subjection? Surely this is not the answer to a peaceful world. Evening Bulletin. Philadelphia, April 24, 1946:—"Roberts to Push British Loan. Former Justice of the Supreme Court, Justice Owen J. Roberts announced that he had accepted the chairmanship of the Commission on International Economic Policy, for Pennsylvania, affiliated with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which is launching an intensive drive to mobilize public opinion in behalf of the proposed British loan and trade agreement." . . . . . Times Herald; Washington, D. C., December 23, 1942. Capitol Stuff by John O'Donnell:—"The gentleman who has come forward with the proposed national war service bill is a Manhattan Lawyer, Grenville Clark, Clark is important in his effectiveness because the Burke-Wadsworth Act which will put Selective Service on the law books is almost word for word as Clark drew it up." written by Major General Sir Leonard Rogers, prominent figure in government circles, to the Daily Telegraph." Sir Leonard is looked upon as a key man in the government's sub rosa maneuvers, is frequently in consultation with Prime Minister Chamberlain and First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill." Philadelphia Record, May 22, 1944:—Caption: "Pledge for Peace Stirs Lively War on Board of United Nations. Two members resign on issue involving World Supergovernment and ABROGATION of sovereign Rights (emphasis authors) Supreme Court Justice Owen J. Roberts is honorary chairman of the committee sponsoring this pledge. Justice Roberts stood solidly behind the pledge stating he would favor a constitutional amendment, if necessary, to weave into the law of the land the commitments envisioned. He particularly approved points 4 and 6 which provide that no member nation may at any time or for any reason, secede, and each member nation shall give up forever the sovereign right to commit acts of war against other nations." Congressional Record, January 23, 1936, Washington Extension of Remarks of Hon. Peter Norbeck: quoting the Gaelic American, Congressman Norbeck of South Dakota states. "Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, president of Columbia College and head of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, is opposed to Senator Borah's candidacy for the Republican nomination for the President. The dispenser of the Carnegie plumbs is hostile to the Idaho statesman because of his opposition, long standing opposition, to foreign entanglements. Regardless of what party is in office, Senator Borah has always been consistently against the adherence of the United States to the League of Nations and the Court." three years from the date of importation." It will be recalled that this same Rt. Hon. Herbert Morrison has very recently been in the United States again. New York Times, February 16, 1954, "U. S. Envoy Urges British-G. I. Journal American, February 19, 1946: "National Anthem Good Only In War. News Item:—"Musicians Union revokes wartime order compelling all groups to play Star Spangled Banner before programs. Concert orchestras and theatre bands eliminate National Anthem from regular schedules. "Your question is a little amusing. Play the Star Spangled Banner any more than we have to? Don't be ridic. We'll save it for the war days." Colonel Llewellin went so far as to favor a common citizenship between American and British subjects. If he had not changed his mind he would have said: "Why should we not recognize our common heritage of so much that is great, one bond of noble ideals, brave aims and high endeavour, by having as a further bond a common citizenship." He went on to say or would have said that no Britisher or American should be considered an alien in the other's country, that they might even hold office in each other's governments. The early edition of the Washington Post printed the "would be" speech which was suppressed in the other editions. # ROCKEFELLER URGES BACKING BRITISH EMPIRE "TO LIMIT" "I would rather die fighting the brutal, barbarous, inhuman force represented by Hitlerism than live in a world which is dominated by that force." "Dear Mr. Sulzberger: # Place Supplies at Britain's Door "The issue that is being fought out is simple and clear cut. Shall free men live under the laws of their own making and # Rockefeller Urges "The magnificent tenacity and unparalleled courage of the English nation must be reinforced by our fullest aid. Every hour is precious. We must act today. God grant that as those who come after us read the history of this fateful hour, they may have occasion to give humble thanks for the stand this day taken by all those who proudly call themselves Americans! Quoted Boston Globe, April 28, 1941. # CONCLUSION And now as we are about to go to press two important events have lifted their heads. First, the statement of the International Civil Defense in its book "Report on Standards of Conduct in the International Civil Service." The report, which has been in the making since 1952 stressed that, "in the event of a conflict between national and international loyalties, the conduct of the international civil servant must clearly reflect the obligation to the international organization." Both major parties had the same foreign policy platform, for this reason many thinking Americans felt that we needed a new party to represent the people and administer this government. We believe in the two party system of government, we believe in the checks and balances, at present and for some few years we have had one party with two heads, a double headed monster. For this reason a Committee for Organizing the Constitution Party was formed. It was set up nationally, a charter was taken out in Washington, D. C. We were making great strides, the people wanted General Douglas Mac Arthur in the presidency, they knew he could be trusted, he had already proven his loyalty to his country. We had co-operation from all over the country, we started a round robin post card appeal, it was making tremend-our headway, in some cases people sent out thousands of cards instead of the twenty we had suggested. The leaders of the Republican party were worried to the extent that a long article appeared in the New York Times, they admitted we were within our rights, but they did not know what to do about it. In one of the large cities in the Mid West a sincere and loyal citizen was threatened, the F. B. I. were to be put on her trail, articles appeared in the press. To one not used to the wiles and intrigues of the opposition it was disconcerting. Then came the infiltration, the sabotage from within, at the last moment, those supposedly working for our cause sent out word for the people to vote for the lesser of two evils, just get Truman out. There were many loyal to the end, no one regretted the long hours at the typewriter to try and save this nation, the people came to the meetings when the thermometer stood one hundred, and when the election day approached, in the wee small hours of the morning, cold and windy, these valiant souls went to the Staten Island Ferry piers to give out literature. The people were mostly with us, not all, because that would have been a miracle. We knew that we were fighting the power of the money lords, the Tories and the internationalists, those like Mr. John D. Rockefeller, Jr. who wanted to give to the limit to the British. (See the Boston Globe, April 26, 1941). Of the money sent to New York for the Constitution Party from all over the country every cent can be accounted for, of that sent elsewhere we have never been able to get an accounting. The Charter remains ours, inviolate. That a group in Texas were of the same opinion, did see the need of a new party, and did form the Constitution Party of Texas was most commendable. This country has suffered much from the interference of the British in our political affairs. In 1944 a campaign was started in England for the "President Roosevelt, we hope, will stand forth as an irreplaceable national leader who has always understood and who never feared to say that without the most strenuous national discipline the demand of war making and peace making cannot be met." Mr. Borah:—"You cannot disfranchise a people by the political parties in power joining upon a certain issue. You can monopolize almost anything in this country, but you cannot monopolize the right of the people to organize a political party. And the only possible way that the masses can effectuate their purpose is to cut through political parties and organizations." Often the question is asked, where is General Mac Arthur, why doesn't he speak, is he letting us down? To those inquiring souls we want to say, General Douglas Mac Arthur did all he could to arouse the American people to the situation. General Mac Arthur has not let the people down, better to say, the American people let him down. We had our opportunity, # FINIS Truth is hard to accept sometimes, truth is not always desired, so if it happens that this author or I or both, suddenly leave this earth, it will be understood. It happened before. # \*\*BIBLIOGRAPHY\*\* Arizona Star Destiny National Message, London New York Journal American New York Herald Tribune New York Mirror San Francisco Leader Prophecy on Parade by W. C. Nabors Woodrow Wilson, Disciple of Revolution by Jennings S. Wise Various Who's Who # \*\*INDEX\*\* | ۸, | Attlee, Hon. Clement R., 80 | |-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------| | ARC Legion 59 | August 20, 1953, 59, 64, 68, 76 | | A.P.A. movement, 59 | Australia, 97 | | Acheson Dean, 166 | Astrology, 62 | | Ackley, S. A., 59 | В, | | Adams, Gov. Sherman, | Babylon System of Government, 31, 35, | | Admonition to King George V., 27 | 64, 68 Becon Behort | | Atheistic Doctrine, 42 | Bacon, Robert | | Atheistic Infidel Revolution, 51 | Bacon, Mrs. Robert, 135 | | Aldrich, Winthrop W., 71 | Baden-Powell, Sir, 50 | | Allen, Marilyn, 75 | Baker, Newton D., 14, 73 | | Ambassador for Peace, 65 | Baldwin, Earl (Stanley), 71, 72 | | America, 4, 32, 69, 97, 101, 114, 115 | Baltour, John, 81 | | Americans, 114 | Baltour, Lord, 79 | | America the Beautiful, 16, 20 | Balance of Power | | American Bible Conference Assn. | Balkan Combine, 12, 98, 136 | | American Coalition, 4/ | Pallinger Prof. Willia I 142 | | American Fleet, 41, /4 | Dailinger, Prof. Willis J., 145 | | American Historical Assn. | Bambast Usper 20 | | America Terrel SS 73 74 | Barnhouse Donald Greek 62 | | American Indicial Settlements Assn | Barter Reverly 107 | | American Legion ii 127 | Bescon Light 63 | | American Peace Centenary, 99 | Beane. Dr. 17 | | America's Peril. 119 | Beaverbrook, Lord ii, 78 | | American Workers Party, 8 | Beck, James, 99 | | American University Union, 100 | Belden Rev. A. D., 73 | | Andrews, Prof. Matthew, 132 | Benham, Charles O., 59 | | Anglo-Israel, 62 | Beresford, Lord Charles, 122 | | Anglican Church, 27 | Besant, Sir Walter, 98 | | Anglo-American Society, 99 | Beveridge, (England) | | Anglo-American Union, 19, 65 | Bible News Flashes, 60 | | Anglo-American Alliance, 81 | Biddle, Ambassador, 82 | | Anglo-French Union | Bingham, Robert, P. | | Anglo-Israelism, 62 | Blair, J. P., 18 | | Anglo-Saxon Christian World | Blatchford, Kobert | | Movement, 43 | Blessing, Rev. William, 75 | | Anglo-Saxon rederation of America, | Doer War 11, 156 | | 24, 25, 26, 27, 56, 46, 47, 48, 54, 70, | Booth Sir Charles Donalus | | Angle Savon Federation Convention 50 | Borah Hon William F iii 02 | | Anglo-Saxon Civilization 74 | Boston Sumphony Orchestra 17 | | Anglo-Saxon Union 18 32, 42 | Boy Scouts, 50 | | Anglo-Saxon Fellowship, 132 | Brabazon, Col. Moore | | Anglo-Saxon World, 30, 36, 43, 69 | Brahany, Thomas, 143 | | Anglo-Saxony | Briand Kellogg Pact, 3, 92 | | Arabs, 53, 69 | Bricker, Hon. John, 3 | | Arbitration, 110, 111, 112, 114, 122 | Bright, John, 71 | | Arizona Star 5, 67 | British (Britain), ii, 4, 16, 17, 18, 24, | | Army-Mc Carthy, 38 | 25, 26, 27, 29, 32, 33, 35, 43, 45, | | Armstrong, Sir Gloster, 20 | 52, 53, 57, 84, 87, 91, 94, 101, 103 | | Arnold, Benedict, 129, 155 | British-American Peace Centenary, 99 | | Article, 10 | British-American Kelations | | Astor, Lord, 114 | British-American Union, 95, 96, 99. | | Asiatic Combine 12 00 154 | British Commonwealth of Marines 22 | | Assuith Lord ii 78 100 | 44 60 65 74 156 | | Association International Conciliation | British Crown 1 114 | | 10 | British Commonwealth of the World | | Atlantic Community, 5 | 35, 45, 49, 55, 75, 76, 80, 156 | | Atlantic Union, 98 | British Government, 25, 94 | C Calcutta, 30 Calhoun, Patrick, 124 Callahan, Patrick Henry, 73 Cameron, William J., 26, 46 Canada, 24, 30, 97, 101 Canadians, 12 Cancellation of Debts Cannon, Bishop James, 134 Canterbury, Archbishop of, 43, 133 Canterbury, Archbishop of, 43, 133 Cantor, Eddie, 14 Capitalism, 18, 30, 97 Capper, Senator, 92 Carlson, John Roy, 54 Cartels, 107 Carter, Boake, 57, 58 Carnegie, Andrew, iii, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 30, 32, 36, 71, 72, 77, 87, 98, 104, 105, 109, 110, 112, 114, 122, 124, 142, 143, 148, 149, 157, 158, 159, 166, 178, 192 Carnegie, Mrs. Andrew, 146 Carnegie Corporation, 11 106, 137, 144 Carnegie Toundations, 8, 11, 40, 71, 105, 132, 136, 144 Carnegie Division of Intercourse and Education, 131 Carnegie Endowment for International Conciliation (see International Conciliation) Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 71, 106, 143, 144, 145, 157, 158, 164, 171, 190 Carnegie Libraries, 131, 143, 145 Carnegie Peace Society, 12 Carnegie Pension Fund, 109, 131 Catlin, George, 166, 167, 170 | Horizon, 52 Horn, Ernest, 136, 140 | J. Jackson, Atty. Gen., 6 Japan, 9, 44, 45, 48, 52, 86, 111, 133, 149, 169 Japanese Admiral 117 Java. 162 | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Horizon, 52 Horn, Ernest, 136, 140 Hornet, 5- Horowitz, David, 57 Houghton, Mrs. Alonzo B., 193 House, Col. Edward, 149 House, Naval Affairs, Committee, 16 | J. Jackson, Atty. Gen., 6 Japan, 9, 44, 45, 48, 52, 86, 111, 133, 149, 169 Japanese Admiral 117 | | Horizon, 52 Horn, Ernest, 136, 140 | Jackson, Atty. Gen., 6 | | Tiornet, >- | J. Jackson, Aity. Gen., 6 Japan, 9, 44, 45, 48, 52, 86, 111, 133, 149, 169 | | Horowitz, David, 57 Houghton, Mrs. Alonzo B., 193 House, Col. Edward, 149 House Naval Affairs Committee, 16 | Jackson, Aity. Gen., 6 Japan, 9, 44, 45, 48, 52, 86, 111, 133, 149, 169 Japanese Admiral 117 Java, 162 Jebb, Sir Gladwyn, 98 Jeffers, Joe, 52 Jefferson, Hon. Thomas, 18, 110, 154 155, 187 Lefferson, Dr. Charles F. 134 | | House Col. Edward, 149 | Japanese Admiral 117 Java, 162 Jebb, Sir Gladwyn, 98 Jeffers, Joe, 52 Lefferson, Hon, Thomas, 18, 110, 154 | | House Naval Affairs Committee, 16 | Jebb, Sir Gladwyn, 98 | | House of Israel, 32 | Jeffers, Joe, 52 Jefferson, Hon. Thomas, 18, 110, 154 | | Houston, Herbert H., 151 Howland, William B., 150, 151 Hudson, Charles, 75 | Jetterson, Hon. Thomas, 18, 110, 134 | | Howland, William B., 150, 151 Hudson, Charles, 75 | Jefferson, Dr. Charles E., 134 | | Hull, Hon. Cordell, 144, 145, 165, 166, | Jehovah, 29 Jehovah Witnesses, 66 | | | Jefferson, Dr. Charles E., 134 Jehovah, 29 Jehovah Witnesses, 66 Jennings, Dr. Iver, 171 Jerusalem, capitol of the world, 31, 35, 40, 45, 46, 61, 64, 67 Jews, 26, 27, 41, 57, 62, 69 | | Hughan, Dr. Jennie, 72 Hughes, Hon. Charles E., 42, 80 | 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | | Hughes, Hon. Charles E., 42, 80 Human Rights, 3 | 40. 45. 46. 61. 64. 67 | | Hughes, Hon. Charles E., 42, 80 Human Rights, 3 Humphrey, Andrew B., 150 Hutchins, Robert M., 145 Hylan, Mayor John F., 127 I. Immigration Barriers, 172 Imperial Conference, 29, 44 | Jerusalem, capitol of the world, 51, 55, 40, 45, 46, 61, 64, 67 Jews, 26, 27, 41, 57, 62, 69 Jewish News, 58 Jewish Year Book, 26 Johnson, Henry, 136 Johnson, Hon. Hiram, iii, 3, 159, 161, 162 Johnson Act, 145 | | Humphrey, Andrew B., 150 Hutchins, Robert M., 145 Hylan, Mayor John F., 127 | Jewish News, 58 | | Hylan, Mayor John F., 127 | Jewish Year Book, 26 | | Hutchins, Robert M., 145 Hylan, Mayor John F., 127 I. | Jewish Year Book, 26 Johnson, Henry, 136 Johnson, Hon. Hiram, iii, 3, 159, 161, | | Immigration Barriers 172 | | | Immigration Barriers, 172 Imperial Conference, 29, 44 Independence Day, 48 India, 162 | Johnson Act, 145 Johnston, Mrs. Elise, 159 Jones, Rufus, 70, 72 Judah Tribe of 27, 35, 41, 49, 60, 89 | | Imperial Conference, 29, 44 Independence Day, 48 | Johnston, Mrs. Elise, 159 | | Independence Day, 48 India, 162 Industrial Control, 175 | Jones, Kufus, 70, 72 | | Indua, 162 Industrial Control, 175 Industrial Revolution, 176 Inter American Bar Assn. Havana, 6 | Judd. Charles H., 140 | | Industrial Control, 175 Industrial Revolution, 176 Inter American Bar Assn. Havana, 6 Interchange of Professors and Preachers. | Jones, Rufus, 70, 72 Judah, Tribe of, 27, 35, 41, 49, 60, 89 Judd, Charles H., 140 Julius, E. Haldeman, 72 Just and Durable Peace, 15, 164, 167 | | India, 162 Industrial Control, 175 Industrial Revolution, 176 Inter American Bar Assn. Havana, 6 Interchange of Professors and Preachers, 81 | Judd, Charles H., 140 Julius, E. Haldeman, 72 Just and Durable Peace, 15, 164, 167 Jefferson, Hon. Thomas, 18, 110, 154. | | 81 | 162 Johnson Act, 145 Johnston, Mrs. Elise, 159 Jones, Rufus, 70, 72 Judah, Tribe of, 27, 35, 41, 49, 60, 89 Judd. Charles H., 140 Julius, E. Haldeman, 72 Just and Durable Peace, 15, 164, 167 Jefferson, Hon. Thomas, 18, 110, 154, K. | | International Bankers, 131, 135 | Kaha Faundatian 10 | | International Chamber of Commerce, 12 | Kahn Foundation, 10 Kafka, Mrs. Alice, 54 | | International Civilization, 12 | Kafka, Mrs. Alice, 54 Kalergi, Count Coudenhoven, 171, 179 | | International Bankers, 131, 135 International Chamber of Commerce, 12 International Civilization, 12 International Conciliation, 8, 9, 131, 150 International Conference at Hague, 73 International Council Religious Educa- | Keete, Mrs. Grace, 159 | | International Conciliation, 8, 9, 131, 150 International Conference at Hague, 73 International Council Religious Education, 52 International Council for Christian Leadership, 38 International Economic Policy, 190 International Fellowship, 100 International Who's Who, 77 | Kellogg-Briand Pact, 73 Kennedy Ambassador Joseph 82 83 | | International Conference at Hague, 73 International Council Religious Education, 52 International Council for Christian Leadership, 38 International Economic Policy, 190 International Fellowship, 100 International Who's Who, 77 | 192 Anibassador Joseph, 82, 85, | | tion, 52 International Council for Christian Lea- | Kent, Tyler, 85 | | International Council for Christian Lea- dership, 38 | Kennedy, John A., 144 Kent, Tyler, 85 Key, Francis Scott, 16, 17, 19, 21 Keynes, Lord, 188 King David, 27, 60, 75 King, Prime Minister Mackenzie, 167, 171, 188 | | dership, 38 International Economic Policy, 190 | Kent, Tyler, 85 Key, Francis Scott, 16, 17, 19, 21 Keynes, Lord, 188 King David, 27, 60, 75 | | dership, 38 International Economic Policy, 190 International Fellowship, 100 | King David. 27, 60, 75 | | International Fellowship, 100 International Who's Who, 77 International Turney Union, 148 | King Drime Minister Mackennia 167 | | International Who's Who, 77 Interparliamentary Union, 148 International Figure 147, 152, 153 | 171, 188 King, Solomon, 60 | | international rinanciers, 147, 172, 173, | King, Solomon, 60 | | International Who's Who, // Interparliamentary Union, 148 International Financiers, 147, 152, 153, 177 International Labor Office, 12, 145, 157, | | | 174, 176 | Kingdom of God on Earth, 25, 27, 33, 35, 41, 59, 67, 68, 89 Kingdom Voice, 53 Kingdom Herald, 60 Kingdom Message Assn., 58 Kingdom Press, 67 | | International Magna Carta Assn., 134 | Time don't voice, 77 | | International Mind Alcoves, 10 International Mind Alcoves (children), | Kingdom Herald, 60 | | International Mind Alcoves, 10 International Mind Alcoves (children), | Kingdom Herald, 60 Kingdom Message Assn., 58 Kingdom Press. 67 | | International Money unit, 17, 167 | Kingsley, Darwin P., 150, 151 | | International New Deal, 65 | Kirchwey, George W., 150 | | International Relations Clubs, 10, 144 | Kinnicutt, Francis, 127 | | International Students Assn., 146 Interdependence Declaration of 132 | Knox. Philander. iii | | 138, 188 | Knoblock, Mr., 47 | | Iran and Iraq, 31, 46, 57, 81 | Korea, 11, 12, 162, 198 | | Insurance of Peace, 94 | Krey A C 136 127 | | Israel Nations 60 | Kullgren, William, 63 | | Iskander, Y. E., 50 | Ku Klux Klan, 59 | | Ismay, Lord, 5 | L. | ## N North American Union, 171, 182 Northcliffe Lord, 132 Norbeck, Hon. Peter, 191 North American Permanent Joint Defense Board, 180 Novus Ordo Sectorum, 29, 67 Nye, Hon. Gerald P., 36, 37, 45 ## O. P. Palestine, 31, 48, 69, 89, 90 Palfrey, Col. William, 129 Pan American Student League, 127 Pan European Union, 167 Pan American Union, 12, 15, 98, 156, 167, 183 Parker, Alton B., 150, 151 Parker, C. F., 39 Parker, Sir Gilbert, 130, 131, 132, 134, 148 Parliament, 148, 191 Passports, 181 Pasvolsky, Dr. Leo, 165 Peace proposals, 110, 167, 192 Peace Societies (meeting of), 16 Pearl Harbor, 48 Peek, George N., 145 Pegler, Westbrook Pelley, William D., 62, 63 Pelley's Weekly, 62 Pendell, Mr. 159 Penrose, Hon. Boise, iii Peoples Progress and Prosperity Act, 53, 165 Periscope Pub. Co., 4, 43 Pershing, Gen. John (Sir), 125 Pilgrim Society, 12, 94, 98, 132, 147, 156, 175 Pilgrim dinner (London) 126, 148 Pinchot, Hon. Gifford, 72, 73 Pinchot, Mrs. Gifford, 72 Pittman, Hon. Senator, 155 Points (23 to take America over), 115 Poindexter, Hon. Miles, iii Poland, 52, 84, 162 Political and economic union, 36, 108 Pope, Rev. Willard H., 56 Post War Security Organization, 12 Tabl, 65 Tabernacle News, 69 Tablet, (Brooklyn), 54 Talk of the Times, 59, 62 Taft, Charles P., 99 Taft, Hon. Robert A., 4, 6, 14, 34, 143, 161, 170, 199 Taft, Mrs. Robert A., 34 Taft, Hon. William Howard, 6, 79, 97, 114, 148, 150, 151, 152 Tariff, 106, 145, 166, 176 Tol., 142, 178 Tea Pot Dome, 26 Telegraph, (London), 35 Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, 27, 40, 41 58, 66, 73 Thompson, Dorothy, 160, 183 Thompson, Robert, 56 Thompson, Mayor William H., 129 Three Headed Eagle, 51, 169 Throne of Britain, 27, 42, 47, 67, 74 Throne of Christ, 27 Throne of David, 35, 40, 42, 49, 60 67, 69, 74, 77 Time Magazine, 52 Tinkham, Hon. George Holden, 11 Tomorrow, 62 Torch of Israel, 56 Totten, Prof. C. A. L., 29 Torah, 58 Toynbee, Prof., 68 Trade-Tariff, 14, 25, 34, 36, 39, 45, 77, 104, 105, 142 178 Treason, 123, 148, 178 Trevor, John B., 54 Triumphant Democracy (1893), 13 Troy, Lillian Scott, 109, 124, 125 Truman, Hon. Harry S., 2, 158, 177, 198 Truth, 53 Truth and Liberty, 59 Tuite, Mr. (Grand Army), 20 Turkish Empire, 31 Twelve Tribes of Israel, 61 U V. on. Arthur, 188 L B 125 | Vansittart Lord 168 | Winant John 175 | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------| | Valera, Eamon de 179 | Winrod Rev. Gerald, 66, 67, 75 | | Van Houston, Mr. S. (Holland), 148 | Wingate, Major General, 20 | | Van Kirk, Walter, 13 | Wiseman, Sir William, 26, 29 | | Vatican, 47 | Wister, Owen, 126 | | Versailles, 3, 163 | Wise, Rabbi Stephen, 73 | | Veterans of Foreign Wars, 127 | Wolfe, General, 30 | | Victoria, (Queen), 28, 59 | Woolley, Dr. Mary E., 72, 73 | | Voting Power, 154, 156, 182 | Women's Action Committee, 159, 160, | | Vrooman, Carl, 151 | 193 | | W. | Woman Voter, 65 | | Waderioeth James 100 | Wood, Gen. Robert E., 146 | | Wages 30 175 176 | the churches 14 | | Wall St 49 | World Army 72 | | Waldo, Richard, 11, 85 | World Brotherhood 51 | | Wallace, Henry, 145 | World Citizens, 49, 50, 76, 94, 129 | | War, 168 | World Civilization, 137 | | War in 1960, 174, 180, 183 | World Court, 144 | | Ward, C. H., 129 | World Currency, 12, 14 | | Ward, Prof., 131 | World Domination, 90 | | War Propaganda, 175 | World Economic Peace, 49 | | Warburg, Felix, 73 | World Economic System, 39 | | Washington, Pres. George, 18, 37, 110, | World Federalists, 158 | | 113, 120, 129, 131, 132, 133, | World Fellowship, (personnel), /2 | | Wasaleki M Ian 93 | World Civilization 127 | | Waterways Commission, 172 | World Hoax, 33 | | Watkins Rev. 56 | World Government ii 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. | | Watkins, Hon. Thomas I., iii | 11. 12. 14. 15. 25. 32. 35. 42. 48. | | Watkins, Hon. Arthur V. | 61, 65, 68, 92, 140, 142, 148, 156, | | Watson, Prof. American History, 10 | 164, 165 | | Watson, Prof. American History, 10 Webster's Biographical Dictionary, 78 | World Kingdom, 74 | | Webster, Daniel, foreword | World to wipe slate clean of debts, 31 | | Wedgewood, Sir Josiah, 167, 188 | World Order, 34, 39, 137 World Parliament of religion, 73 | | Weldon, Rt. Rev. J. E., 134 | World Parliament of religion, 73 | | Weller Charles E 72 | World Peace movement, /0, /2 | | West Willis Mason 120 130 | World Police 12 14 71 07 142 | | Westchester Country Club. 16 | World Policy 95 | | (meeting at) | World rule 35 | | West Indies Fleet, 74 | World Unity, 70 | | West Point, 21, 22, 192 | World State, 9, 10, 88, 89, 147, 149, | | Wheat, 181 | 171, 174, 177 | | What's Next, 72 | World Peace Foundation, 145 | | Wheeler, Benjiman Ide, 151 | World Who's Who, 77, 126 | | Wheeler, Fion. Burton, K., 84, 168 | World War 1, 111, 24, 27, 31, 61, 148, | | Wheeler Mrs Burron K 84 84A | 1)9 World War 11 11 61 66 05 156 | | Wheeler Gen Joseph 98 | World War 11, 11, 01, 04, 95, 150 | | When Gog Attacks, 59 | 64 21 25 22 24 152 174 176 | | Wickersham, George W., 132, 133 | Wrench Sir Evelyn | | White House, 17 | \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* | | Whitehouse, Mrs. Norman de, 160 | Υ. | | White, Thomas Raeburn, 151 | Yankee, 112, 127 | | Whitman, Walt, 188 | Young Communist League, 141 | | Williams Talson 151 | Young Pioneers, 141 | | Wilhemina Princess 20 | Young, Owen D., 186 | | Wilfull Fleven iii 3 02 | Younghusband, Francis, 75 Youth Message, 32 | | Wilson, Woodrow, ii 31 148 149 150 | Youth Message, 32 Yugoslavia, 9 | | 151 | i ugosiavia, y | | Wilson, Sir Arnold, 168 | Z. | | Wilson, George Grafton, 151 | Zabriskie, George A., 20 | | Willkie, Wendell, 49, 166, 172, 178, | Zeigler, Rev. Paul D., 56 | | 170 180 | Zionism 41, 85 | --- ## Navigation - Parent: [And Men Wept (1954) by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin](https://samisdat.in/books/and-men-wept-1954.md)